F1000Research F1000Research 2046-1402 F1000 Research Limited London, UK 10.12688/f1000research.73401.3 Research Article Articles P2P Lending platforms in Malaysia: the awareness among Malaysian adults

[version 3; peer review: 2 approved]

 Nguyen Lan Thi Phuong Conceptualization Investigation https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5678-2705 a 1 Muthaiyah Saravanan Formal Analysis Methodology https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0684-703X 1 Sy Malick Ousmane Project Administration Resources 2 Kalabeke Wisdom Project Administration https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8416-5691 3 Faculty of Management, Multimedia University, Cybejaya, Selangor, 63100, Malaysia School of Economics, Finance and Marketing, Royla Melbourne Institute of Technology, Melbourne, Victoria, 3000, Australia Faculty of Management, Multimedia University, Cyberjaya, Selangor, 63100, Malaysia nguyen.thi.phuong.lan@mmu.edu.my

No competing interests were disclosed.

 5 9 2023 2021 10 1096 13 4 2023 Copyright: © 2023 Nguyen LTP et al. 2023 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Background - Since 2016, the Securities Commission (SC) in Malaysia has given licenses to only eleven P2P lending platforms. Such lending platforms are expected to disrupt the lending services of traditional lenders in the coming years. However, being still in their infant stages, it is essential to know the extent to which such platforms are made known to potential investors out there. This study examines the extent to which young adults are aware of Malaysia's eleven P2P lending platforms.   

Methods - A sample of 65 undergraduate students majoring in finance and accounting was used for this pilot study. An online questionnaire was designed with three main parts: demographic, financial literacy, and P2P lending awareness.  

Results - Findings show that more than half of respondents in the sample are not aware of P2P lending platforms in Malaysia.  Most of the respondents are financially literate to certain degrees. Those aware of their presence underestimated the potentially high level of their default rates and misunderstood that investor would be fully protected by such platforms when a loan default.  

Conclusions -The study's findings have shed light on the current awareness of P2P lending platforms among Malaysian young adults, potential investors of such platforms in the coming years.

 P2P lending platforms financial literacy Malaysian young adults awareness FinTech investors The author(s) declared that no grants were involved in supporting this work. Amendments from Version 2

In this version, we would like to thank the Malaysian Government for the funding that allowed us to carry out the extension of data of this paper.  "We are grateful for the funding from the Malaysian Government through the Ministry of Education, Malaysia, under the 2020-FRGS project. We are thankful for the idea and advice from Professor Malick Sy, a Corporate Constancy and Risk Management Strategist and a Corporate Trainer at Aventis Learning Group, Singapore. We also recognize the ongoing collaboration between researchers from MMU and RMIT (Australia) that brought the idea for launching this research. We also acknowledge all respondents who provided valuable views and answers to our questionnaire survey. With them, this research is possible."

 Introduction

The availability of the internet and the everyday use of mobile phones in Asia in recent years has opened doors for various types of FinTech platforms, including P2P lending, to come into a country. Starting from North America and Europe, P2P lending has grown aggressively in many Asian countries since 2014, taking up its market share even faster than in developed countries ( Stern, Makinen, & Qian, 2017). For instance, China has the most significant number of P2P lending platforms, estimated at 2000 in 2017, according to Stern et al. (2017). There are only eleven P2P lending platforms licensed by the Securities Commission (SC) in Malaysia now. Therefore, these platforms need to follow guidelines issued by SC, from which all of them must be incorporated under the Companies Act 1965 with a minimum paid-up capital of RM5 million. In addition, P2P lending platforms cannot place funds received from lenders into their accounts instead of in a third-party account. Furthermore, directors of those P2P lending platforms must prove themselves fit and proper to manage the business. All these requirements help to prevent future fraud caused by these platforms.

To apply for a loan in each P2P lending platform, a borrower needs to apply for loans via its online platform. Information such as payslip, phone number, and other social media profiles are required on such online platforms. The borrower’s risk profile will be analyzed and categorized based on such given information. Once the borrower’s application is accepted, it is open to investors to invest. Unlike the traditional banks, P2P lending platforms do not bear any credit risk of their loans; however, their investors do. Given the standardized set of information (business plan, financial performance, social network status, etc.) required from borrowers, credit scoring methodologies, loan disbursement and collection mechanisms are different from one P2P lending platform to another. Thus, many questions regarding issues such as security, creditability, and trustworthiness of P2P lending platforms need clear answers from investors, borrowers, and regulators.

Furthermore, the collapse of hundreds of P2P lending platforms in China since 2013 ( Bloomberg Businessweek, October 3, 2018) due to frauds may signal potential risks possessed by P2P lending platforms to investors. In Malaysia, the first P2P lending platform defaulted in August 2018. According to Funding Society Malaysia, this default is mainly because of its SMEs’ business slowdown that led to its default payments to the platform (the Edge, September 21, 2018).

Although the default rate for P2P lending platforms remains at 1% and below, as reported by the CEO of Funding Society Malaysia, we do not want to see more P2P lending platforms default in Malaysia soon. Without a doubt, the successful operation of such P2P lending platforms depends heavily on the awareness of those platforms. This study aims to examine the awareness level of the eleven P2P lending platforms among Malaysian adults. The study also explores if past investment experience and financial knowledge would influence such awareness from Malaysian adults.

The rest of the paper is organized as follows: Section 2 discusses related past studies; Section 3 describes the data sample, study period, and method of analysis used for this study; Section 4 discusses empirical findings and implications of this study; the final section presents main conclusions.

 Literature review

A peer-to-peer lending platform connects borrowers and lenders at a central marketplace for a service fee which is a fraction of the interest paid by borrowers to lenders. With the first two peer-to-peer lending platforms: Zopa and Prosper, launched in 2016, the world of finance has been expanded so that more individuals can participate in lending and borrowing activities. Such a P2P lending platform will carry out its risk classification for each borrower to determine the interest rate charged to that borrower. P2P lending provides many advantages over traditional banks’ lending ( Rubini, 2017). P2P lending allows borrowers to apply for loans online instead of going to a branch; thus, it is convenient and time-saving. Applying for a loan is simple at P2P lending platforms where borrowers only need to express their loan requests, i.e. loan maturity and amount, and provide personal information, i.e. passport/identification card, photo, bank statement. In addition, P2P lending allows more individuals with low or no collateral and lousy past credit records to be financially included. Moreover, individual lenders can allocate even a small amount of money, like RM100 in Malaysia, to individual borrowers and diversify their investments across different borrowers. In short, the P2P lending process is fast and straightforward, where a loan can be granted within a short period as one day.

Although P2P lending provides more opportunities to earn extra income for individual lenders, it exposes them to the potential risk of default. Lenders must be fully responsible for any possible loss when borrowers fail to make payments. Thus, loans provided by P2P lending platforms are categorized as unsecured ( Rubini, 2017). Lenders are advised to make loans to various borrowers instead to mitigate any potential default risk.

In order to make a sound financial decision, an individual is expected to have a certain level of financial literacy, measured by finance concept related knowledge and practical application of such knowledge ( Oanea & Dornean, 2012; Kimiyaghalam & Safari, 2015; Sudakova, 2018; Tavares, Almeida & Cunha, 2019). A person with a higher financial literacy is expected to be more aware of FinTech products, resulting in a higher chance of adopting them ( Morgan & Trinh, 2020; Jin, Seong & Khin, 2018). Thus, basic knowledge about financial concepts is necessary to make a sound lending decision at a P2P lending platform.

A decision making often involves the use of existing knowledge and prior experiences ( Chen, Jin, Zhang & Yang, 2016; Gill, Khurshid, Mahmood & Ali, 2018). Thus, it is believed that past lending experiences that are either good or bad will affect the awareness of new FinTech instruments such as P2P lending.

Undoubtedly, the growth of FinTech is accelerated by the continuous development of technologies, business and personal demands for easy access with lower cost, faster speed and efficiency to various financial transactions ( Shuttlewood, Volin, Wozniak, 2016). According to Gai, Qiu, and Sun (2018), five main issues faced by the FinTech industry, namely security and privacy, are data techniques, hardware and infrastructure, applications and management, and service models. For a layman, personal security and privacy are the two top main concerns that may prevent them from adopting a FinTech instrument like P2P lending ( The Telegraph, 2017). Ultimately, the adoption of FinTech instruments like P2P Lending and others may not be necessarily a smooth ride as it depends heavily on the awareness of individuals living in a community ( Gai, Qiu, & Sun, 2018).

To the best of our knowledge, studies on the awareness of P2P lending platform in Malaysia is somewhat limited to date. Thus, this study aims to fill in this gap.

 Methods Survey instrument

Based on the study’s objective, an online survey was carried out between January 2020 and March 2022. This online survey was approved by the Director of Technology Transfer Office (TTO) and Secretariat of the Research Ethics Committee of Multimedia University. Potential respondents for this survey were informed clearly on the questionnaire about the objective of the data collection. Respondents’ participation is entirely voluntarily.

An online questionnaire was designed with four main parts: demographic, financial literacy, and P2P lending awareness. The first section is the respondents’ demographic information, including gender, marital status, age, ethnicity, employment status, and educational background. For gender, female and male respondents are coded as 1 and 2, respectively. In terms of age, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 are coded for respondents coming from six age groups, i.e. “17 – 20”, “20 – 29”, “30 – 39”, “40 – 49”, “50 – 59”, and “60 and above”, respectively. In terms of ethnicity, Malay, Chinese, Indian, and other respondents are given a code of 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively. For educational background, four levels of education, secondary education, diploma, degree and postgraduate/professional, are coded as 1, 2, 3, and 4. For employment status, a code of 1 is given to individuals who are students, while a code of 2 is given to non-student or working adult individuals.

To measure the financial knowledge of respondents, three big financial literacy questions, created by Global Financial Literacy Excellence Center (GFLEC), are asked in the second section of the questionnaire. These three questions have been used in more than 20 countries around the world to test the level of financial literacy of individuals in three essential areas of knowledge in finance: (1) the effect of compounding interest, (2) the effect of the inflation rate, and (3) the benefit of diversification. For each respondent, scores obtained from answers to the three questions will be totalled up and converted to a percentage representing his/her financial literacy score. A correct answer will be given a score of 1, while a wrong answer has a score of 0. The benchmarking scores shown in Table 1 will be used to analyze the level of financial literacy among the respondents.

Benchmarking scores and levels of financial literacy.

Total financial literacy scores Total financial literacy percentages Level
0 0 None
1 33 Weak
2 66 Medium
3 100 Strong

The third section of the questionnaire collects data on the awareness of the eleven P2P lending platforms. Questions related to the main characteristics of P2P lending given in Shi, Wu, and Hollingsworth (2019) and some unique features of P2P lending platforms in Malaysia are used to test respondents’ awareness of P2P lending platforms in Malaysia. Each respondent will be asked if he/she agrees with each of the ten statements describing basic features and characteristics of P2P lending platforms in Malaysia based on a 5-point Likert scale, ranging from strongly disagree to agree strongly. The features and characteristics of P2P lending platforms in Malaysia are (1) the requirements of collateral; (2) the higher interest rates offered as compared to banks; (3) the questionable internet security; (4) the non-standardized credit assessment; (5) the possible default risk, (6) the licensing status; (7) the possible small lending amount; (8) the potentially unrecovered loans, and (9) the presence of unqualified bank borrowers and (10) the free liability of such P2P lending platforms when a loss occurs. The total scores and benchmarking scores for respondents’ P2P lending awareness are computed ( Figure 1) and categorized based on the benchmarking scores given in Table 2.

P2P lending awareness scores.

Benchmarking scores and levels of P2P lending awareness.

Total P2P lending awareness scores Total P2P lending awareness percentages Level
10 20 Very low
20 40 Low
30 60 No idea
40 80 Good
50 100 Very good
The study sample

Any individuals who have savings and wish to invest for additional income were invited individually to participate in this study using a purposive sampling method. After filtering incomplete questionnaires, the answers of only 335 respondents will be used to analyze this study.

 Statistical analysis

Using IBM SPSS Statistics 26, frequency, descriptive, normality, Pearson coefficients and multiple regression analyses were carried out.

As suggested by Chen, Jin, Zhang and Yang (2016), Gill, Khurshid, Mahmood and Ali (2018), Morgan and Trinh (2020), Jin, Seong and Khin (2020) that prior experience and knowledge and financial literacy are expected to have a positive impact on the awareness of P2P lending. Thus, the multiple regression model will be tested for this study as follows: P2P Lending Awareness = α + β 1 Financial Literacy + β 2 Lending Experience + β 2 Knowing at least One P2P Lending Platform + ε i

Where: α is a constant; β1, β2, and β3 are coefficient correlations for variables of Financial Literacy, Lending Experience and Knowing at least One P2P Lending Platform; and εi is the residual term.

Therefore, the following three hypotheses will be tested:

H 1: Financial literacy affects the awareness of P2P lending positively.

H 2: Lending experience affects the awareness of P2P lending positively.

H 3: Knowing at least one P2P lending platform affects the awareness of P2P lending positively.

 Discussion of findings Descriptive statistics and frequency of the study sample

Table 3 and Table 4 reports the frequencies and descriptive statistics of data collected for this study. In terms of gender, 50.7% of respondents are males, and 49.3% are females. The majority of respondents, i.e. 45.4%, are young and between 20 and 29 years of age, while the second (30 – 39 years old) and the third (40 – 49 years old) largest age groups have 24.2% 14.9% of respondents, respectively. In terms of ethnicity, 33.7%, 26.3%, and 14.3% of respondents are Chinese, Malay and Indian, while the rest is specified as others. 79.7% of respondents hold a bachelor’s degree or higher education level. The majority of respondents, i.e. 61%, are single. Out of 335 respondents, 57% are not students, suggesting that they are employable people.

Frequencies.

Frequency Valid percent Cumulative percent
Lending experience Yes 136 40.6 40.6
No 199 59.4 100.0
Total 335 100.0
Knowing at least 1 P2P lending platform Yes 42 12.5 12.5
No 293 87.5 100.0
Total 335 100.0
Financial literacy scores 100 137 40.9 40.9
67 85 25.4 66.3
33 72 21.5 87.8
0 41 12.2 100.0
Total 335 100.0
Gender Male 170 50.7 50.7
Female 165 49.3 100.0
Total 335 100.0
Age Above 60 8 2.4 2.4
50-59 25 7.5 9.9
40-49 50 14.9 24.8
30-39 81 24.2 49.0
20-29 152 45.4 94.3
17-20 19 5.7 100.0
Total 335 100.0
Ethnicity Others 86 25.7 25.7
Indian 48 14.3 40.0
Chinese 113 33.7 73.7
Malay 88 26.3 100.0
Total 335 100.0
Education Postgraduate 84 25.1 25.1
Degree 183 54.6 79.7
Diploma 40 11.9 91.6
Secondary 28 8.4 100.0
Total 335 100.0
Maritial status Married 129 38.5 38.5
Single 206 61.5 100.0
Total 335 100.0
Student/Non-students Non-student 191 57.0 57.0
Student 144 43.0 100.0
Total 335 100.0

Descriptive statistics.

Lending experience Knowing at least 1 P2P lending platform P2P lending awareness Financial literacy Gender Age Ethnicity Education Marital Student/Non-students
N 335 335 335 335 335 335 335 335 335 335
Mean 0.41 0.13 67.27 64.99 1.51 2.80 2.39 2.96 1.39 1.57
Median 0.00 0.00 66.00 67.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00
Std. Deviation 0.49 0.33 10.71 35.25 0.50 1.14 1.13 0.84 0.49 0.50
Minimum 0 0 20 0 1 1 1 1 1 1
Maximum 1 1 100 100 2 6 4 4 2 2

When asked if they ever lent money in the past to either friend, family members, businesses, or financial and non-financial institutions, 59.4% said “No,” and 40.6% said “Yes”, suggesting that many respondents have no past lending experience at all. When asked if they could name at least one P2P lending platform in Malaysia, most respondents (87.5%) could not name any.

In terms of financial literacy, 66.3% of respondents have medium (67%) and high (100%) financial literacy, while the rest have weak (33%) or zero (0%) financial literacy. Out of 335 respondents, 137 have a perfect score of 100% for financial literacy in this study, suggesting that these respondents have perfect knowledge in all three areas of finance: compounding rate, inflation and diversification.

Based on the P2P lending awareness scores computed for 335 respondents in the study sample, only 14.33% have a score of 80 and above, suggesting that the majority of respondents in the sample are not aware of the features and characteristics of P2P lending platforms in general. Respondents who could answer correctly for all the 10 questions are classified as having good and very good awareness level accounts for only 14.33% of the study sample.

 Correlation analysis

In terms of Pearson correlation (see Table 5), the P2P lending awareness scores obtained for 335 respondents is significantly and positively correlated with their past lending experience (0.16), ability to name at least one P2P lending platform in Malaysia (0.14), education (0.12), marital status (0.16), and student/non-student status (0.11). This finding may suggest that a person who has one of the following criteria appears to be aware of more features and characteristics of P2P lending:

previously lent his/her money to others,

knows at least the presence of one P2P lending platform in Malaysia,

possess higher education,

being married, and

being a working adult

Pearson correlations between variables.

Lending experience Knowing at least 1 P2P lending platform P2P lending awareness Financial literacy Gender Age Ethnicity Education Marital Student/Non-Student
Lending experience 1 .128 * .155 ** -0.012 0.097 0.057 0.088 0.057 0.045 0.018
Knowing at least 1 P2P lending platform .128 * 1 .135 * .172 ** -0.006 -0.022 -0.044 .124 * 0.071 0.019
P2P lending awareness .155 ** .135 * 1 0.066 0.011 0.087 -0.013 .116 * .157 ** .112 *
Financial literacy -0.012 .172 ** 0.066 1 -0.025 .170 ** -.166 ** .201 ** .166 ** .210 **
Gender 0.097 -0.006 0.011 -0.025 1 0.018 .148 ** -.113 * -0.042 0.001
Age 0.057 -0.022 0.087 .170 ** 0.018 1 -.254 ** .211 ** .609 ** .642 **
Ethnicity 0.088 -0.044 -0.013 -.166 ** .148 ** -.254 ** 1 0.034 -.303 ** -.263 **
Education 0.057 .124 * .116 * .201 ** -.113 * .211 ** 0.034 1 .173 ** .215 **
Marital 0.045 0.071 .157 ** .166 ** -0.042 .609 ** -.303 ** .173 ** 1 .563 **
Student/Non-student 0.018 0.019 .112 * .210 ** 0.001 .642 ** -.263 ** .215 ** .563 ** 1

Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).

Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).

Past lending experience is also positively correlated to the ability to know at least one P2P lending platform in Malaysia at the 5% significance level. This result implies that individuals who were active in lending money in the past will always look for more lending opportunities and thus know about Malaysia’s current P2P lending platform(s).

In addition, the significant Pearson correlations of 0.13 and 0.17 between “knowing at least 1 P2P Lending platform” and each of the “Financial Literacy” and “Education” variables at the 1% and 5% levels, respectively, suggest that individuals with higher education and financial literacy scores also are better at naming at least one P2P platform in Malaysia.

Moreover, the significant and positive correlations between financial literacy and each of the following variables: age (0.17), education (0.2), marital status (0.17), and student/non-student status (0.21) at the 1% level suggest that individuals with older ages or higher levels of education, or being married, or being working adult appear to possess higher financial literacy scores. However, the negative and significant correlation between financial literacy and ethnicity (-0.17) at the 1% level suggests that the highest financial literacy scores were found for Malay respondents, followed by Chinese, Indian and others.

As ethnicity has a significant and negative correlation with each of the following: age (-0.25), marital status (-0.3), and student/non-student status (-0.26) at the 1% level, implying that most Malay respondents are a young student and single, while Chinese and Indian respondents are much older, being married and working. The significant and positive correlation (0.15) between ethnicity and gender at the 1% level hinders that most Malay respondents are female, while more Chinese and Indian respondents are male.

 Multiple regression analysis

The following Table 6 shows the results of multiple regression where the P2P Lending Awareness dependent variable is regressed against three independent variables: Lending Experience, Knowing at Least One P2P Lending Platform, and Financial Literacy. The results show that only past lending experience (0.14) and the knowledge of at least one P2P lending platform (0.1) has a significant and positive impact on the P2P lending awareness at the 1% level. At the same time, there is no significant impact of financial literacy on the awareness of P2P lending. Thus, H1 and H2 cannot be rejected, while H3 is rejected. The findings confirm that an individual with a past lending experience and knowledge of at least one P2P lending platform seems to take the trouble of knowing more about P2P lending characteristics. Thus, past lending experiences and the knowledge of at least one P2P lending platform in Malaysia positively affect the awareness of P2P lending among Malaysian adults. These findings are consistent with what was found in Chen, Jin, Zhang and Yang (2016) and Gill, Khurshid, Mahmood and Ali (2018).

Multiple regression result.

Standardized coefficients t- Statistics Significance Collinearity statistics
Beta Tolerance VIF
Dependent variable: P2P lending awareness (Constant) 49.512 0.000 **
Lending experience 0.142 2.613 0.009 ** 0.983 1.018
Knowing at least 1 P2P lending platform 0.109 1.972 0.049 * 0.954 1.049
Financial Literacy 0.049 0.901 0.368 0.969 1.032
Model fit results:
R-square: 0.04
p-value for F-statistics: 0.004 **
Mahalanobis distance Minimum 0.766
Maximum 13.969
Cook's distance Minimum 0.000
Maximum 0.093

Significant at the 0.05 level.

Significant at the 0.01 level.

The insignicant impact of financial literacy on the awareness of P2P lending platform implies that a person with a high financial literacy score may not necessarily be more aware of P2P lending characteristics. In other words, a financially knowledgeable person may not be interested in anything new innovative investment instrument apart from the traditional one, which is contradicting with the findings in Chen, Jin, Zhang and Yang (2016), Gill, Khurshid, Mahmood and Ali (2018), Morgan and Trinh (2020), Jin, Seong and Khin (2020).

The less-than-5 VIF scores for the three independent variables in the model suggest no multicollinearity issue among them. In addition, Mahalanobis Distance with a value (13.96) for a model of three independent variables suggests no significant outlier in the sample. A less than 0.01 p-value for F-statistics suggests that the hypothesis of b1 = b2 = b3 = 0 should be rejected, implying the model fit. A 4% R-square statistic suggests that only 4% of P2P lending awareness of respondents in the sample can be explained by three independent variables, suggesting that many other variables may explain more about the awareness of P2P lending among Malaysian adults.

 Conclusion

Although eleven P2P lending platforms have been licensed by the Securities Commission (SC) in Malaysia since 2016, the awareness level of these platforms is still unknown among Malaysian adults. This study aims to examine the awareness level of P2P lending platforms among Malaysians. With a purposive sampling method, data were obtained from a sample of 335 Malaysian adults between January 2020 and March 2022. Together with descriptive analysis, tested hypotheses of possible impacts on the respondents’ awareness of P2P lending from three factors: (1) financial literacy, (2) lending experience and (3) knowledge of the existence of at least one Malaysian P2P lending platform, were tested. Overall results show that most respondents in the sample are between 20 and 39 years of age (70%) and had at least a bachelor degree (80%). Although almost 60% of respondents were in the workforce, two out of three respondents did not have past lending experience, and four out of five could not name any P2P lending platforms present in Malaysia. Although seven out of ten respondents have good knowledge in three areas of finance: compounding rate, inflation and diversification, only 14.33% had a good and excellent awareness level of P2P lending. Thus, one would expect lesser awareness about P2P lending among Malaysian adults whose financial literacy is poor or zero. Test results from multiple regression analysis suggest that past lending experiences positively affect the awareness of P2P lending in Malaysia, but not the financial literacy. Thus, one may conclude that the awareness about P2P lending among Malaysian adults is too low, despite their high level of education and financial literacy. No investing experience and not knowing any existing P2P lending in the country may be the reason for this low awareness. Therefore, for P2P lending to thrive in Malaysia, the eleven P2P lending platforms need to be promoted aggressively in various social media outlets. The low lending experiences that Malaysians have may hinder the less or absence of lending opportunities given by the traditional banking system. Thus, the growth of FinTech platforms such as P2P lending will allow more individual Malaysians to invest for additional income.

This study mainly focuses on the awareness level of P2P lending among Malaysian adults and its relation to their prior investment experience, knowledge of at least one P2P lending in Malaysia and financial literacy. Therefore, extended research in future can test for other potentially influencing factors such as individual trust, privacy, risk-averse, etc.

 Author contributions

Literature review, research framework, questionnaire design, hypothesis testing and data analysis have been discussed and carried out by all authors of this paper.

 Data availability

Figshare. Data source_P2P Lending Platforms in Malaysia - The Awareness Among Young Adults.xlsx. DOI: https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.14877381.v1 ( Nguyen, 2021).

This project contains the following data:

Since 2016, the Securities Commission (SC) in Malaysia has given licenses to only 11 P2P lending platforms. Such lending platforms are expected to disrupt lending services of traditional lenders in the coming years. However, being still in their infant stages, it is important to know the extent to which such platforms are made known to potential investors out there. This study aims to examine the awareness level of the eleven P2P lending platforms among Malaysian adults. The study also explores if past investment experience and financial knowledge would influence such awareness from Malaysian adults. Using a purposive sampling method, a pilot study was carried out with a sample of 355 Malaysian adults. An online questionnaire was designed with three main parts: demographic, financial literacy, and P2P lending awareness.

 Acknowledgement

The Malaysian government supported this study under the 2020 FRGS project. We are grateful for the idea and advice are given by Malick Sy, a Corporate Constancy and Risk Management Strategist and a Corporate Trainer at Aventis Learning Group, Singapore. We also recognise the ongoing collaboration between researchers from MMU and RMIT (Australia) that brought the idea for launching this research. We also acknowledge all respondents who provided valuable views and answers to our questionnaire survey. Without them, this research would not be possible.

 References Bloomberg News: How China’s Peer-to-Peer Lending Crash Is Destroying Lives. 2018. Reference Source Chen X Chong Z Giudici P : Networking with Peers: Evidence from a P2P Lending Platform. Asian Development Bank Institute;2020. Working Paper No.1080, February 2020. Chen XH Jin FJ Zhang Q : Are investors rational or perceptual in P2P lending? Inf. Syst. e-Bus. Manag. 2016;14(4):921–944. Gai K Qiu M Sun X : A survey on FinTech. J. Netw. Comput. App. 2018;103:262–273. 10.1016/j.jnca.2017.10.011 Gibilara L Mattarocci G : Peer-to-Peer Lending and Real Estate Mortgages: Evidence from the United Kingdom. J. Euro. Real Estate Res. 2018;11(3):319–334. 10.1108/JERER-12-2016-0048. Gill S Khurshid M Mahmood S : Factors Affecting Investment Decision Making Behavior: The Mediating Role of Information Searches. Eur. Online J. Nat. Soc. Sci. 2018;7(4):758–767. Gonsalez L : Blockchain, herding and trust in peer-to-peer lending. Manag. Financ. 2019;46:815–831. 10.1108/MF-09-2018-0423 He Q Li X : The Failure of Chinese Peer-to-Peer Lending Platforms: Finance and Politics. J. Corp. Finan. 2021;66:101852. 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2020.101852 Hidajat T : Unethical practices peer-to-peer lending in Indonesia. J. Financial Crime. 2020;27(1):274–282. 10.1108/JFC-02-2019-0028 Jin CC Seong LC Khin AA : Factors Affecting the Consumer Acceptance towards Fintech Products and Services in Malaysia. Int. J. Asian Soc. Sci. 2018;9(1):59–65. 10.18488/journal.1.2019.91.59.65 Kim D : Bounded rationality in a P2P lending market. Rev. Behav.Finan. 2020;13:184–201. 10.1108/RBF-10-2019-0141 Kimiyaghalam F Safari M : Review papers on definition of financial literacy and its measurement. SEGi Rev. 2015;8:81–94. Li Q : The Mechanism and Effectiveness of Credit Scoring of P2P Lending Platform: Evidence from Renrendai.com. China Finance Review International. 2018;8(3):256–274. 10.1108/CFRI-06-2017-0156 Lusardi A Mitchell OS : Planning and Financial Literacy: How Do Women Fare?. Am. Econ. Rev. 2008;98:413–417. 10.1257/aer.98.2.413 Morgan PJ Trinh QL : Financial literacy, financial inclusion, and savings behavior in Laos. J. Asian Econ. 2020;68:101197. 10.1016/j.asieco.2020.101197 Nemoto N Storey D Huang B : Optimal Regulation of P2P Lending for Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises. Asian Development Bank Institute;2019. Working Paper No. 912. Nguyen TPL : Data source_P2P Lending Platforms in Malaysia The Awareness Among Young Adults.xlsx. figshare. Dataset. 2021. 10.6084/m9.figshare.14877381.v1 Oanea D-C Dornean A : Defining and Measuring Financial Literacy.New Evidence from Romanian’ Students of the Master in Finance. Annals of the Alexandru Ioan Cuza University - Economics. 2012:59(2),113-129. Rosavina M Rahadi RA Kitri ML : P2P Lending Adoption by SMEs in Indonesia. Qual. Res. Financ. Mark. 2019;11(2):260–279. 10.1108/QRFM-09-2018-0103 Rubini A : Fintech in a Flash; Financial technology made easy. London, United Kingdom: Simtac Ltd.;2017. San-Jose L Retolaza JL : Crowdlending as a Socially Innovative Corporate Financial Instrument. International Perspectives on Crowdfunding. 2017;129–149. Shi X Wu J Hollingsworth J : How does P2P Lending Platform Reputation Affect Lenders ‘Decision in China?. Int. J. Bank Mark. 2019;37(7):1566–1589. 10.1108/IJBM-11-2018-0309 Shuttlewood P Volin M Wozniak L : Global fintech investment growth continues in 2016 driven by Europe and Asia, accenture study finds. 2016. Stern C Makinen M Qian Z : FinTechs in China – With a Special Focus on Peer-to-Peer Lending. J. Chinese Economic Foreign Trade Studies. 2017;10(3):215–228. 10.1108/JCEFTS-06-2017-0015 Sudakova A : Financial Literacy: From Theory to Practice. Conference paper .2018. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/328729119_FINANCIAL_LITERACY_FROM_THEORY_TO_PRACTICE Tavares FO Almeida LG Cunha MN : Financial Literacy: Study of a University Students Sample. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Edu. 2019;14(9):499–510. The Telegraph: Consumer Survey 2017.The Telegraph (U.K.).2017. The World Bank Group: the Little Data Book on Financial Inclusion. The Global Findex database. Reference Source Trönnberg CC Hemlin S : Lending Decision Making in Banks: A Critical Incident Study of Loan Officers. Eur. Manag. J. 2014;32(2):362–372. 10.1016/j.emj.2013.03.003 10.5256/f1000research.133920.r139454 Reviewer response for version 2 Thaker Hassanudin Mohd Thas 1 Referee Department of Economics and Finance, Sunway University, Selangor, Malaysia

Competing interests: No competing interests were disclosed.

 24 8 2022 Copyright: © 2022 Thaker HMT 2022 This is an open access peer review report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. recommendation approve

I think the responses are acceptable and reasonable with proper justifications.

Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?

Yes

If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?

Partly

Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?

Yes

Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?

Partly

Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?

Yes

Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?

Partly

Reviewer Expertise:

NA

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard.

 10.5256/f1000research.133920.r139455 Reviewer response for version 2 Rahadi Raden Aswin 1 Referee https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8936-2339 School of Business and Management, Institut Teknologi Bandung, Bandung, Indonesia

Competing interests: No competing interests were disclosed.

 28 6 2022 Copyright: © 2022 Rahadi RA 2022 This is an open access peer review report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. recommendation approve

In overall the study results have been improved, especially by raising the number of respondents significantly to 355. I am satisfied with the results and analysis and conclude that the study can be indexed in its current form.

Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?

Yes

If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?

Partly

Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?

Partly

Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?

Yes

Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?

Partly

Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?

Partly

Reviewer Expertise:

Financial Technology; P2P Lending

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard.

 10.5256/f1000research.77049.r124173 Reviewer response for version 1 Rahadi Raden Aswin 1 Referee https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8936-2339 School of Business and Management, Institut Teknologi Bandung, Bandung, Indonesia

Competing interests: No competing interests were disclosed.

 8 4 2022 Copyright: © 2022 Rahadi RA 2022 This is an open access peer review report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. recommendation approve-with-reservations

As the data involved in this study is quite limited, the results and analysis from the work is also limited and prone to judgment error. I would suggest to enrich the data to reach 100 at least, following the guidelines of Israel (1992) for minimum number of respondents. 1 If the authors can get more data, then the result would be much better

Results - Findings show that more than half of respondents in the sample are not aware of P2P lending platforms in Malaysia. Most of the respondents are financially literate to certain degrees. Those aware of their presence underestimated the potentially high level of their default rates and misunderstood that investor would be fully protected by such platforms when a loan default. This can happen because of the limited data.

Only descriptive analysis is presented in this work. A heavy revamping of the paper has to be done, to present the analysis result in a more scientific way.

Conclusions should be written as follows: RQ answers, implications (theoretical, practical, managerial), implementation plan, recommendations, limitations and future research.

Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?

Yes

If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?

Partly

Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?

Partly

Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?

Yes

Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?

Partly

Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?

Partly

Reviewer Expertise:

Financial Technology; P2P Lending

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard, however I have significant reservations, as outlined above.

References : Determining Sample Size. Florida Cooperative ExtensionService, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciencesl .1922; Reference source Nguyen Thi Phuong Lan MMU, Malaysia

Competing interests: We have no competing interest.

 11 5 2022

The authors' response to the reviewer can be found here:

https://f1000researchdata.s3.amazonaws.com/linked/421364.Resposes_to_Reviewer%231.docx

10.5256/f1000research.77049.r98215 Reviewer response for version 1 Thaker Hassanudin Mohd Thas 1 Referee Department of Economics and Finance, Sunway University, Selangor, Malaysia

Competing interests: No competing interests were disclosed.

 10 11 2021 Copyright: © 2021 Thaker HMT 2021 This is an open access peer review report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. recommendation approve-with-reservations

This is an interesting study on P2P lending platforms which explores the topic in an area in which the literature is limited by focusing on Malaysia. However, there are some major issues that need to be resolved.

Issues:

It is unclear what drives the research motivation: what was the goal of the article, what is the state of debate pertaining to this research?

Literature review: not included. Why is a literature review reported in the paper?

Methods: how did the authors determine the sample of 65 students? How are they representative of Malaysia’s youngsters? Please provide a justification for why these ones were chosen in particular.

Furthermore, the authors report information, but I would suggest the authors include analysis. What is your hypothesis about platform awareness? What are the factors that drive awareness of these platforms? Where are your research gaps? What are the current debates pertaining to your topic in the literature?

Conclusion: at present, it appears to just be a summary of your results. What do the authors think their managerial/theoretical implications are, and what should we take away from those results?

Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?

Yes

If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?

Partly

Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?

Yes

Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?

Partly

Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?

Yes

Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?

Partly

Reviewer Expertise:

I did research on crowdfunding and p2p lending as well.

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard, however I have significant reservations, as outlined above.

Nguyen Thi Phuong Lan MMU, Malaysia

Competing interests: We have no competing interest.

 11 5 2022

The authors' response to the reviewer can be found here:

https://f1000researchdata.s3.amazonaws.com/linked/421363.Resposes_to_Reviewer%232.docx