This research attempts to understand the communication climate of Facebook surrounding the COVID-19 vaccine issue, the nature of dominant content and users’ engagement patterns with them.

Facebook is the most popular social media platform in Bangladesh (94.46%), compared to YouTube (3.31%) and Twitter (0.3%), so we selected it as the source of data for this study. We collected the data from Facebook pages using CrowdTangle, a public insights tool owned and operated by Facebook. It can access public pages and groups to collect various types of data. However, we excluded group data in this research because Facebook groups and pages are different in terms of users’ interaction patterns, participation rates, and security issues. To collect the data from relevant Facebook posts, we conducted a keyword search. A large share of the users in Bangladesh use Facebook in the Bangla language. For that reason, we determined the following Bangla keywords in the Bangla alphabet: “corona vaccine,” “coronar vaccine,” “corona tika,” “coronar tika,” “corona oshudh,” “coronar oshudh,” “corona protishedhok,” and “coronar protishedhok.” All search terms can be translated as corona vaccine or vaccine of the corona.

We set the timeline from 8 March to 2 December 2020. The first case of coronavirus in Bangladesh was identified on 8 March 2020. As Facebook is an interactive platform, so we collected the data on 17 December 2020 (15 days after the end date of the data collection period) after stabilizing the threads. The search result produced 37,460 Facebook posts relevant to the topic. Of them, we selected the top 10,000 posts for the final analysis based on their total interactions, which was 26.70% of the total search results: These posts were from 1,087 different Facebook pages, on average 9.20 posts from each page. We categorized the content into six types: link, live video, native video, photo, status, and YouTube video. In Facebook, each of the mentioned content can usually have the following definitions and modes: a link and a photo can be shared with or without any text; live video can be completed or scheduled; native video is video that is uploaded directly to Facebook; a status is mainly text-based, often contains other elements, such as tags; YouTube videos are often embedded/shared on Facebook. We measured the users’ engagement based on nine interaction parameters, including six Facebook reactions: comments (mean [M]=32.90, standard deviation [SD]=140.06), shares (M=145.17, SD=1345.86), like (M=1377.04, SD=4792.64), love (M=74.98, SD=788.35), wow (M=6.50, SD=40.33), haha (M=52.79, SD=408.28), sad (M=16, SD=372.76), angry (M=3.67, SD=55.05), and care (M=5.40, SD=51.67). In this study, we followed a bivariate statistical analysis and a simple time-series analysis with one-day intervals. The numbers and percentages are presented in tables, time-series data are presented in graphs.

In February 2016, Facebook introduced five basic reactions: love, sad, wow, haha, and angry, alongside like or thumbs-up. These reactions were influenced by the six universal reactions: fear, anger, joy, sadness, disgust, and surprise ( Gu et al., 2019), proposed by Ekman (1992) based on human facial expressions ( Keltner et al., 2019). However, studies found that disgust and anger, and fear and surprise share similar characteristics, meaning the four following emotions should be considered as the actual basic emotions: anger, joy, sadness, and surprise ( Jack et al., 2014). Unlike basic emotions, Facebook reactions represent more varied and often contradictory expressions: like or thumbs-up usually expresses likeness, agreement, happiness, approval, and acceptance; love expresses positivity, affection, empathy, support, kindness, and liking something with feeling; sad expresses empathy, grief, tragedy, and support; haha expresses laughter, fun, mockery, and often rejection; wow expresses muted disdain, surprise, immediate shock, and skepticism; and angry expresses denial, aggressiveness, strong and overt disdain, and dislike ( Al-Rawi, 2020).

In contrast to the idea of basic emotions, the circumplex model of affect proposes that human emotion is more complex and diverse than the basic emotion theory explains ( Russell, 1980). At least 28 interconnected emotional states of humans can be defined with two variables: emotional valence or sentiment and emotional arousal or intensity ( Citron et al., 2014; Freeman et al., 2020; Yang & Chen, 2012). This two-dimensional model of human emotions defines emotional valence as positive and negative and emotional arousal as high and low ( Preoţiuc-Pietro et al., 2016). In this study, we tried to position Facebook reactions within this paradigm but with little modification. For valence, we defined like, love, wow, and care as positive, and angry, sad, and haha reactions as negative valence ( Giuntini et al., 2019). As the number of Facebook emotions is limited, unlike the circumplex model that has 28 distinct but relative emotions, we defined the seven reactions as follows: love, care, angry, and wow as high arousal, and like and sad as low arousal. That means positive high includes love, care, and haha; positive low includes like; negative high includes angry and wow; negative low includes sad. Although like, according to its defined meanings, belong to the lower arousal dimension, its degree is moderate, which is closer to the high arousal dimension (see Russell, 1980). Again, Al-Rawi (2020) defined wow as positive, we defined it as negative based on the findings of Jack et al. (2014) (i.e., fear and surprise are the same, and wow expresses surprise or shock, which is negative). It is important to note that expressions through these reactions vary widely, and a reaction may express contradictory emotions: haha both expresses joy and refutation. It makes this reaction’s position in the paradigm uncertain: it can be positive high and negative high. For such ambiguous nature, previous studies excluded haha from their interpretations (e.g., Al-Rawi, 2020).

Of the six content types, link ( n=8,614; 86.14%) was dominant, followed by photos ( n=491; 4.91%) and native videos ( n=466; 4.66%); YouTube video ( n=52; 0.52%) was on the bottom of the list ( Table 1). During the time span, links were shared the most in July ( n=1,696; 19.69%), followed by August ( n=1,331; 15.45%); photos were shared the most in July ( n=147; 29.94%) as well, followed by October ( n=72; 14.66%). July (20.73%) had the highest percentage of content, followed by August (15.28%) and April (14.33%). Figure 1 shows that the percentage of the links content type was dropping gradually with a few fluctuations. On the other hand, the percentages of live video and status were slowly increasing with a few drops. However, except for the line of links, other lines do not show any significant changes.

All posts generated 17,144,403 interactions during the time span. The numbers of interactions were higher in the first half of the period, roughly from April to July 2020 ( Figure 2). The interactions reached to the highest on 17 April 2020 ( n=201,834), with a few more surges on 27 April ( n=135,941), 9 May ( n=176,936), 22 June ( n=131,564), and 2 July ( n=169,524). The average interactions dropped in the following months, and again increased slightly in the mid-October 2020 and late-November 2020. However, except 17 October ( n=116,743) and 21 November ( n=100,619), the interactions were dropping gradually after July 2020 till December 2020.

Of all content types, links (71.22%) received the highest interactions, followed by native videos (16.52%), while YouTube videos (0.54%) received the lowest interactions. In all content types, like as a reaction had the highest percentages: in all except status, the second-highest was love; in status (11.16%), the second-highest was haha ( Table 2). A comparison of interaction percentages among the content types shows that YouTube video (4.16% and 1.35%) received relatively higher percentages of comments and care in its interaction types, followed by native videos (4.05%); native videos (19%) were shared more often, followed by live video (8.33%). Of the six reactions, links received relatively higher percentages of likes (84.14%); photos received higher percentages of love (16.80%); statuses received higher percentages of wow (0.65%), haha (11.16%), and sad (5.58%).

Of the total interactions during the period, 1.92% ( n=328,976) were comments and 8.47% ( n=1,451,726) were shares ( Table 3). Of the six reactions, likes were the highest (80.32%), followed by love (4.37%) and haha (3.08%); angry (0.21%) had the lowest share. Within all interaction types, link had the highest percentages: 70.92% comments, 56.21% shares, 74.61% like, 47.85% love, 70.77% wow, 66.12% haha, 46.40% sad, 85.59% angry, and 51.60% care ( Table 3). Within comments (11.23%) and love (25.04%), photo had the second-highest percentages; within haha (13.80%) and sad (22.78%), status had the second-highest percentages; within shares (37.07%), likes (15.01%), wow (13.88%), angry (6.41%), and care (20.84%), native video had the second-highest percentages.

This study for the first time attempts to explore the nature of content and public engagement in the COVID-19 vaccine issue on Facebook. To provide some novel insights, the top 10,000 most interactive and relevant Facebook posts have been analyzed following a combination of three communication research techniques: time series analysis, network analysis, and sentiment analysis.

This exploratory research has a few main findings. Vaccine-related links were the highest in percentage (86.14%) of all Facebook content during the period and the highest shared content (56.21%) as well, which counters the result of Baresch et al. (2011) that showed Facebook users’ infrequently (49%) share news through links. Links shared in social media platforms are mostly news items primarily from different online news portals ( Baresch et al., 2011), which infers that Bangladeshi Facebook users mostly consume news items related to the COVID-19 vaccine. However, the decline of links suggests that users are increasingly becoming less interested in vaccine-related news. Kleis Nielsen et al. (2020) also found a similar tendency that using Facebook for COVID-19 news and information is declining: from 10 April to 24 June 2020, the percentage declined from 24 to 12. Unlike the present study, however, the previous study considered all COVID-19 issues instead of only the vaccine issue and produced a similar result.

The interactions were higher during the first half of the period but decreased with time. Interactions surge mainly due to vaccine-related news irrespective of its valence (i.e. positive and negative). However, it seems positive news helps interactions to grow more than negative news. For example, two crucial vaccine-related positive news items from mainstream media influenced the interaction to reach its highest on 17 April: “The University of Oxford declared that the vaccine for COVID-19 would come in September,” and “The trial of COVID-19 vaccine would begin from the next week” (e.g. Daily Jugantor). The interaction reached its second-highest on 27 April due to a few more positive news events: “Corona vaccine production will start from May this year,” and “India’s Serum Institute will start producing COVID-19 vaccine soon” (e.g. Bangla Tribune, DW). Nevertheless, no significant positive follow-ups occurred in the consecutive months, so the interaction lines remained steady most of the time. Another surge on 17 October was for positive news articles: “Russia produced the first COVID-19 vaccine in the world,” and “Bangladesh’s Globe Biotech claimed the invention of COVID-19 vaccine” (e.g. BBC News, Prothom Alo).

Like and love are the two leading reactions, meaning the valence of users’ reaction to vaccine-related content is positive and, to some extent, highly intense. On the other hand, the lowest instances of the angry reaction indicate users’ minimal negative emotion toward the issue. Both tendencies indicate a positive valence with from moderate to high arousal, suggesting Facebook users’ optimistic attitude toward the COVID-19 vaccine. But note that users’ sentiments can be different for different content types: link has more positive valence, whereas status has comparatively more negative valence. However, news links often produce discontent among users, perhaps due to presenting unsatisfactory and undesired information, such as the cancellation and failure of vaccine, and demystified fake news. In practice, the COVID-19 vaccine produced uncertainties among the public around the world, often allowing many to produce vaccine-related misinformation and fake prescriptions ( Limaye et al., 2020). Also, during the pandemic period, COVID-19 misinformation is highly prevalent in social media platforms like Facebook ( Al-Zaman et al., 2020; Islam et al., 2020).

Another finding shows that links about the vaccine generate more interactions than others. More specifically, links are shared more and generate more comments compared to the other content types. Previous studies revealed that the primary reason for Facebook users’ news link-sharing behavior is to share important news with others that might be helpful ( Baek et al., 2011). It allows easier dissemination of news and sociality, the attachment to other users. In this regard, the present study expands on the previous knowledge, adding that users not only share links containing important information but also links allow more users to engage in discussion.