F1000Research F1000Research 2046-1402 F1000 Research Limited London, UK 10.12688/f1000research.129250.1 Research Article Articles Goji berry (Lycium barbarum) inhibits the proliferation, adhesion, and migration of oral cancer cells by inhibiting the ERK, AKT, and CyclinD cell signaling pathways: an in-vitro study

[version 1; peer review: 2 approved]

 Sanghavi Amee Conceptualization Data Curation Formal Analysis Investigation Methodology Resources Validation Visualization Writing – Original Draft Preparation Writing – Review & Editing 1 Srivatsa Ananth Formal Analysis Funding Acquisition Investigation Methodology Resources Validation Visualization Writing – Original Draft Preparation Writing – Review & Editing 1 Adiga Divya Conceptualization Formal Analysis Investigation Methodology Resources Validation Visualization Writing – Original Draft Preparation Writing – Review & Editing 2 Chopra Aditi Conceptualization Data Curation Formal Analysis Investigation Methodology Project Administration Supervision Validation Visualization Writing – Original Draft Preparation Writing – Review & Editing https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4805-5943 a 1 Lobo Richard Conceptualization Formal Analysis Investigation Methodology Resources Supervision Validation Visualization Writing – Original Draft Preparation Writing – Review & Editing https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3202-1108 3 Kabekkodu Shama Prasada Conceptualization Investigation Methodology Project Administration Supervision Validation Visualization Writing – Original Draft Preparation Writing – Review & Editing https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4158-3893 2 Gadag Shivaprasada Formal Analysis Investigation Methodology Project Administration Resources Validation Visualization Writing – Original Draft Preparation Writing – Review & Editing 3 Nayak Usha Formal Analysis Investigation Methodology Resources Supervision Validation Visualization Writing – Original Draft Preparation Writing – Review & Editing https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1995-3114 3 Sivaraman Karthik Conceptualization Data Curation Formal Analysis Funding Acquisition Investigation Methodology Resources Validation Visualization Writing – Original Draft Preparation Writing – Review & Editing 1 Shah Ashmeet Data Curation Investigation Resources Validation Visualization Writing – Original Draft Preparation Writing – Review & Editing 1 Manipal College of Dental Sciences, Manipal, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, 576104, India Manipal School of Life Sciences, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, 576104, India Manipal College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, 576104, India aditi.chopra@manipal.edu

No competing interests were disclosed.

 22 12 2022 2022 11 1563 15 12 2022 Copyright: © 2022 Sanghavi A et al. 2022 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Background: Lycium barbarum (L. barbarum), popularly referred to as Goji berry, is a promising herb known for its powerful antiantioxidant, antibacterial, and anti-inflammatory properties. It is used in traditional Chinese medicine due to its powerful antiantioxidant, antibacterial, and anti-inflammatory properties. It has also shown good anti-cancer properties and has been tested against liver, colon, prostate, breast, and cervical cancers. However, no study has yet evaluated the role of goji berries against oral cancer. Hence, the present paper aims to evaluate the anticancer properties of L. barbarum against oral squamous cell carcinoma.

Method: Ethanolic extract of L. barbarum (EELB) was tested for its anticancer properties by performing the 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl-2H-tetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay, colony formation, cell proliferation, and scratch wound test. The impact of EELB on the signaling transduction pathways of Extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK1/2), protein kinase (AKT1), cyclin D1 and epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) was also assessed by western blot.

Results: The results showed that EELB can impede CAL-27 cell growth, proliferation and migration in-vitro. It even reduced the phosphorylation of ERK1/2 and AKT1 with concomitant downregulation of cyclin D1 (CCND1), cadherin 2 (CDH2), and vimentin (VIM) and upregulation of cadherin 1 (CDH1) expression suggesting its anti-proliferative and anti-EMT effects in oral cancer.

Conclusion: Goji berry has good antiproliferative and anti-invasive properties. It affects potential EMT markers and signaling transduction pathways involved in oral cancers. Hence goji berry can be tried as a potential anticancer agent to manage oral squamous cell carcinoma.

 Nutrition Food Fruit Functional food Traditional Chinese Medicine Cancer Oral Cancer Goji Berry Herbal; Lycium barbarum; Oral squamous cell carcinoma Indian Council of Medical Research STS - Indian Council of Medical Research Grant 2019 (2019-08642) The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. 1. Introduction

Oral cancer is a malignant neoplasm commonly affecting the buccal mucosa, lip, gingiva, palate, tongue, and floor of the mouth. 1 , 2 It is considered the sixth most common cancer worldwide. 1 Among all the oral cancers, oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) is the most common variant. 3 – 5 According to the World Health Organization (WHO), approximately 6,57,000 patients suffer from oral and throat cancer every year, of which more than 330,000 patients die annually. The mortality is higher among the central and south Asian countries. This is because of the high use of tobacco and arecanut/betel chewing. 3 , 4 Apart from tobacco, use of beedis andcigars, low socioeconomic status, high alcohol consumption, poor oral hygiene, poor diet, and increased incidence of Human Papilloma Virus (HPV), syphilis, and chronic candidiasis are some of the other risk factors that increase the prevalence of oral cancer in southeast Asian countries. 6 – 8

Oral cancers are managed by radiation, chemotherapy, and surgery. 9 However, these treatment options often deteriorate the quality of life and have a high risk of post-treatment morbidity. Patients on long-term chemotherapeutic agents often report chronic fatigue, hair loss, easy bruising, onset of infection, anemia, nausea, vomiting, loss of appetite, constipation, diarrhea, renal dysfunction, changes in libido, heart problems, reduced lung capacity and difficulty in breathing, bone and joint problems. 10 The relapse of cancer cells, development of resistance to chemotherapy, and toxic effects on the other healthy tissues have also been reported with extensive use of chemotherapy. Owing to these problems, researchers are constantly exploring newer alternatives to manage cancer.

Plant-derived phytochemicals and derivatives have gained tremendous popularity in managing various cancerous lesions, including oral cancer. 11 Several compounds derived from plants are being used for managing various types of cancer. The herbal medicine or phytomedicine market is likely to reach $550 billion by the end of 2030. 11 – 17 Natural products have been tried as adjuncts to conventional chemotherapeutic agents and have been “documented to decrease the lethal effect of using high doses of chemotherapeutic agents, and this in turn improves the quality of life of cancer and overall survival rate of patients”. 16 A study reported that around half (50%) of anticancer drugs that were approved from the year 1940 to 2014 were natural products or were directly procured from plants. 14 Another study also reported that more than 60% of patients suffering from cancer used plant-based products instead of the conventional chemotherapeutic agent. 6 Talib et al. (2020) stated that “products derived from natural sources, such as plant-derived products; are more accessible, less expensive and toxic compared to those produced synthetically”. Moreover, natural products have multiple compounds that act by varied mechanisms to inhibit the growth of cancer cells and may also prevent the onset of drug resistance. 17 Many recent studies have found that when natural compounds are used along with conventional chemotherapic agents and radiation therapy, they can sensitize the tumors and have a synergistic effect. 11 – 18 A combination therapy may enhance the therapeutic efficacy and reduces the required effective doses of chemotherapuetic agent. 18 – 20 Many plant-derived products like allicin, curcumin, cinnamon, saffron, reservatol, shagol, etc. have been tested for managing oral cancer. 21 Recently, L. barbarum, commonly known as goji berry; Chinese wolfberry; Himalayan goji, and Tibetan goji has emerged as a promising herb with anticancer, anti-inflammatory, and antioxidant properties. 22 – 25 However, its effect in managing oral cancer has not been reported previously.

L. barbarum belongs to the family ‘Solanaceae’. The plant is native to southeast European and Asian countries. It is commonly used as a dry fruit in the Himalayan, China, and Tibetan regions. It is also used as a traditional Chinese medicine. 22 , 24 L. barbarum fruit contains abundant polysaccharides ( L. barbarum polysaccharides or (LBPs), scopoletin, vitamin C analog (glucopyranosyl, L, ascorbic acid analogs), βeta-carotene, zeaxanthin, and flavonoids that have promising antioxidant, immuno-modulating and anticancer properties. 24 – 26 Clinical and preclinical studies have confirmed the medicinal and therapeutic effects of L. barbarum for managing chronic fatigue, aging, stroke, ulcerative colitis, glaucoma, diabetes mellitus, and Alzheimer's disease. L. barbarum extract has shown promising results against cancers of the breast, liver, leukemia, colon, rectum, prostate, and cervix. 21 – 31 Mao et al. (2011) observed that around 200 to 1,000 mg/l of polysaccharide in goji berry, known as lycium barbarum polysacchride (LBP) can inhibit the proliferation of the cancer of the colon by inducing G0/G1 arrest. 29 Shen and Du (2012) also confirmed that LBP has antiproliferative effects against breast cancer cells and can arrest the cell cycle at S-phase. 30 Although the antiproliferative and anticancer properties of L. barbarum are gaining popularity; to the best of our knowledge, studies evaluating the anticancer efficacy of L. barbarum against oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) have not been reported. Hence, this paper aims to evaluate the anticancer effect of L. barbarum on the human OSCC cell line (CAL-27).

 2. Methods

The study is an in-vitro analysis of anticancer properties using the CAL-27 cell lines (RRID:CVCL-1107, ATCC, USA). The study was conducted from 9 th July 2019 to 8 th July 2020. The study was done after obtaining the institutional ethics committee approval (IEC no: 460/2019). Goji berry ( Lycium barbarum L) was obtained from China's official distributor (Kenny delights Pvt. limited). Berry authentication was done by Gopal Krishna Bhat, a retired taxonomist of ‘Poornaprajna College’ at Udupi, Karnataka, India. The sample was authenticated and the berries were deposited at the ‘Manipal College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Department of Pharmacognosy with voucher ref no: PP626.

2.1 Preparation of <italic toggle="yes">L. barbarum</italic> extract

The fruits (berries) of L. barbarum were first thoroughly cleaned with distilled water and then dried using a hot air oven (at 45 oC). The berries were then grounded and powdered using a crusher to obtain a dried powder. Around 250 minced powder of the berries was subsequently macerated with 1000 mL of ethanol solution for three days and they were occasionally shaken to allow the ethanol to mix with the powder. The macerated solution was then strained, and the prepared solvent was evaporated via a rota evaporator. The extract prepared was brown in color, sticky and semisolid in consistency, and had a fruity fragrance. The extract was collected and stored in a desiccator 30 ( Figure 1).

Schematic representation of the study design (Created in Biorender). 2.2. Test for anticancer properties of extract of <italic toggle="yes">L. barbarum</italic> (EELB)

2.2.1 Cell culture

The OSCC cell line (CAL-27, RRID: CVCL-1107, ATCC, USA) was used for all the experiments. The cells were cultured in Dulbecco's Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM) with 10% of fetal bovine serum (Himedia, India) at a temperature of 37°C in 5% CO 2. The adherent cell monolayers were grown to 70%—80% confluency and then the cells were harvested using trypsin solution (0.25%, Himedia, India) before the experimentation. The EELB extract dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) was used in all the experiments. The cells treated with DMSO (0.1%) were considered as vehicle control and the cell cultured in a complete medium without EELB extract served as control.

2.2.2 Cell viability assay

3-(4,5-Dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-Diphenyltetrazolium Bromide (MTT) assay was performed to determine the effect of ELLB on the growth and division of cancer cells. 32 The CAL-27 cells were first seeded at a concentration of around 5000 cells per well and were allowed to attach overnight. The cells were then treated with the extract at varying concentrations (1 μg, 10 μg, 100 μg per mL) for 48 hours. Cells treated with DMSO (0.1%) were considered as vehicle control. At the end of 48 hours, the cells were exposed for 4 hours to MTT (5mg/mL in phosphate buffer saline (PBS), Sigma Aldrich, USA). Following incubation with MTT, the media was aspirated, the formazan crystals were dissolved in DMSO solution, and the absorbance was measured at 570nm using a microplate reader (Varioskan, ThermoFischer Scientific, USA). The percentage of cell viability was calculated using the optical density and the background-corrected absorbance as follows: Percentage of cell viability = 100 X (Optical density of test group/Optical density of the control group). The data were represented as the mean±SD of the percentage of cell viability.

2.2.3 Anchorage-dependent colony formation assay

The colony formation assay helps to check the viability of the cell based on the ability of a single cell to form colonies. 1 The colony-forming test is considered a gold standard assay to check the survival rate of cells upon the use of an anti-cancer agent. The experiment was performed using CAL-27 cells. 31 In brief, 100 cells were seeded in a 60mm cell culture petri dish and were exposed to 100 μg/mL of EELB. The media was replaced once in three days with a complete medium containing 100 μg/mL of EELB. The experiment was terminated at the end of 14 days. The cells which were treated with DMSO (0.1%) were used as vehicle control. At the end of 14 days, the media was discarded, and the cells were washed with PBS and stained for five minutes with 0.5% crystal violet dissolved in methanol. The excess stain was removed and cells were rinsed again with PBS. Following this, the cells were photographed using a gel documentation system. The experiment was performed in duplicates and repeated thrice.

2.2.4 Cell migration assay

Cell migration assay is used to measure the capability of a cancer cell to migrate, which is indirectly linked to its potency to invade the connective tissue and metastasize. The effect of EELB on cell migration of CAL-27 was evaluated by performing the wound healing assay. 33 , 34 CAL-27 cells were first seeded in a 6-well plate (1x10 5 cells per well) and the cells were left to form a monolayer. A sterile microtip was used to make scratches in the cell monolayer. After making scratches, a fresh medium with EELB extract (100 μg/mL) was added to the test wells. The area of the wound remaining and the rate of migration of cells into the scratched area was examined for 72 hours. The scratched area was imaged at given time points with the help of a Rolera emc2 camera attached to an Olympus CK41 microscope (Olympus, Japan). The percentage cell migration rate and the percentage of wound remaining were calculated using the formulas; percentage migration rate = [(Area of the wound at 0 hour – Area of the wound at time T1)/Area of the wound at 0 hour] X 100, and the percentage of wound remaining = (Area of the wound at time T1/Area of the wound at 0 hour) X 100.

2.2.5 Western blot analysis

The results of the MTT assay, colony formation, and wound healing assay suggested the negative effect of EELB on CAL-27 cell proliferation, growth, and migratory ability. To evaluate the molecular alterations behind the observed effects, we further analysed the expression levels of the extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK1/2), Akt serine/threonine kinase1 (AKT1), cyclin D1 (CCND1), cadherin-1 (CDH1), cadherin-2 (CDH2) and vimentin (VIM). ERK1/2, AKT1 and CCND1 are well-known inducers of proliferation and survival in cancer cells. Loss of CDH1 and overexpression of CDH2 and VIM, which are linked to the epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), are the frequent events during metastatic spread. The effect of EELB on these proteins would hint at the anticancer properties of L. barbarum against OSCC. The cells treated with DMSO (0.1%) were used as vehicle control and the cell cultured in complete medium without EELB extract served as a control. The western blot analysis was performed based on the previously described as follows. In brief, the proteins were extracted using RIPA buffer supplemented with protease inhibitor cocktail (Sigma Aldrich, USA), and the concentration of proteins was assessed using the Bradford assay kit (Sigma Aldrich, USA). Around 30 μg of the total protein was separated using 10% SDS PAGE, and transferred onto a Nitran membrane (BioRad, USA). The blots were blocked using 5% bovine serum albumin (BSA) (Himedia, India) for 1 hour and then probed separately with the primary antibodies [p-ERK1/2 (RRID:AB_2315112), ERK1/2 (RRID: AB_390779), p-AKT1 (RRID: AB_329825), AKT1 (RRID:AB_329827), CDH1 (RRID: AB_2291471), CCND1 (RRID: AB_2259616), CDH2 (RRID: AB_2687616), VIM (RRID: AB_10695459) and β-Actin (RRID: AB_330288); 1:5000, Cell Signalling Technology, USA)] overnight at 4°C. The phosphorylation site of AKT1 and ERK1/2 was Ser473 and Thr204/Tyr202, respectively. Following incubation with horseradish peroxidase (HRP) tagged secondary antibodies (1:5000; RRID: AB_2099233, Cell Signaling Technology, USA), blots were washed thrice (10mins each) with tris buffer saline containing 0.01% tween 20 (TBST) and visualized using enhanced chemiluminescence reagent (BioRad, USA). The images were taken using the ImageQuant LAS 4000 (GE Healthcare, USA). The antibody against β-Actin was used as a loading control. The band densities were quantified using ImageJ tool (RRID:SCR_003070, https://imagej.nih.gov/ij/). 35

2.2.6 Statistical analysis

All of the assays were conducted in duplicates and were repeated three times for reliability. The data in the bar graphs represent mean±SD. A p-value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

 3. Results 3.1 EELB negatively regulates the colony-forming ability of CAL-27 and cell viability

The effect of EELB on the cell viability and colony-forming ability of cancerous cells was analyzed by MTT assay and anchorage-dependent colony formation assay, respectively. At 100 μg, EELB inhibited cell proliferation with 65.5% cell viability compared to 91.7% viability seen with the vehicle control group ( Figure 2A). EELB at 100 μg/mL significantly inhibited colony growth in CAL-27 cells ( Figure 1B, 1C). The number of colonies reduced significantly for the treated group compared to the vehicle control group. L. barbarum effectively inhibited colony formation in CAL-27 cancer cells. A reduction in the cancer cells’ vitality was observed when the CAL-27 cells were exposed to EELB.

Effect of <italic toggle="yes">L. barbarum</italic> on Cell viability and growth: (A) Cells treated with <italic toggle="yes">L. barbarum</italic> at different concentrations (1 μg, 10 μg, and 100 μg) for 24 hours. After incubation with MTT, absorbance was measured at 570nm and viability was calculated. Results are expressed as a percentage of viable cells. Data are expressed as mean ± SD values of three independent experiments, with P<0.05. A concentration- dependent decrease in the cell viability was observed when the CAL-27 cells were treated with different concentrations of <italic toggle="yes">L. barbarum</italic> for 24 hours. A concentration of 100 μg of <italic toggle="yes">L. barbarum</italic> extract inhibited cell proliferation with 65.5 % cell viability compared to the DMSO control (97.5%). (B) The effect of <italic toggle="yes">L. barbarum</italic> on the colony formation ability of CAL-27 cells was performed using clonogenic survival assays. Cells were pre-treated with different concentrations of <italic toggle="yes">L. barbarum</italic> (100 μg) for 24 hours. Cells treated with DMSO were kept as vehicle MIT control and untreated cell with Dulbecco's Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM) media without DMSO were kept as control. <italic toggle="yes">L. barbarum</italic> effectively inhibited colony formation in CAL-27 cells. The colony number was significantly reduced upon treatment with the 100 μg of the extract. (C) Bar graph showing the reduced number of colonies after <italic toggle="yes">L. barbarum</italic> extract treatment. The experiment was performed in triplicate, with P-value <0.05 considered statistically significant. 3.2 EELB inhibits migration of oral cancer cells

The results of the cell migration assay proved that L. barbarum extract inhibited cell migration by decreasing the migration rate in CAL-27 cells. The distance between the edges of the wound was narrow at 24 hours, and it closed completely at 72 hours period in the control group ( Figure 3A). Treatment with L. barbarum lowered the migration of CAL-27 cells. At 72 hours, the percentage of the wound remaining for the control and the DMSO group was 11.5% and 14.3%, respectively ( Figure 3B). Nevertheless, at the end of 72 hours, L. barbarum extract was successful in inhibiting cell migration of CAL-27 cells. Approximately 42.8% of the wound remained at 72 hours in the treated group. Further, there was a significant reduction in the migration rate upon L. barbarum extract treatment (57.19%) as opposed to control cells (88.47%) ( Figure 3C). These results indicate the anti-migratory potential of L. barbarum against CAL-27 cells.

Inhibitory effect of <italic toggle="yes">L. barbarum</italic> extract on cell migration: (A) Treatment with <italic toggle="yes">L. barbarum</italic> significantly inhibited the migration of CAL-27 cells. At a concentration of 100 μg, a reduction in cell migration and an increase in the percentage of wound remaining were observed. At the end of 72 hours, the percentage of wounds remaining was 42.8% in the treated group whereas, in the untreated group, it was 11.5%. (B) and (C) Representative Bar graphs depicting the percentage of wounds remaining and percentage migration rate at the given time points. 3.3 EELB controls the ERK1/2, AKT1-phosphorylation, and levels of EMT markers

The cell treated with L. barbarum caused a reduction in the AKT1 and ERK1/2 phosphorylation. The reduction in AKT and ERK levels upon EELB treatment indicates its role in controlling cell proliferation and cell survival. Further, higher CDH1 protein expression along with reduced levels of CDH2, VIM, and CCND1 was noted in the group treated with EELB compared to the control group ( Figure 4A, 4B). Increased CDH1 and reduced CDH2 and VIM levels support the beneficial effect of ELLB in inhibiting cell migration and EMT in oral cancer cells.

Effects of <italic toggle="yes">L. barbarum</italic> on ERK1/2, AKT1 phosphorylation, and EMT marker expression: (A) Representative western blot images showing reduced phosphorylation of ERK1/2 and AKT1 upon <italic toggle="yes">L. barbarum</italic> extract treatment. Higher CDH1 protein expression along with reduced levels of CDH2, VIM and CCND1 were observed when compared to the control in CAL-27 cells. (B) Bar graph showing normalized protein expression in treated and untreated groups. Densitometric analysis was performed using ImageJ software ( <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/">http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/</ext-link>) using β-actin as an internal control (VC). The intensities of each bands were normalized with the corresponding β-actin band intensities. The normalized protein expression for ERK1/2 and AKT1 was represented as the ratio of phospho-protein to total protein. 4. Discussion

The present study assessed for the first time the anticancer potential of goji berry against OSCC. The results showed that goji berries extract can be tried for the treatment of oral cancer. The reduction in cell viability and effective inhibition of colony formation of cancer cells indicate that goji berry extract has antiproliferative properties. Additionally, EELB was found to reduce the migration of cancer cells, which in turn reflects its role in controlling the adhesion of cancer cells to the epithelial surface. EELB also affected the expression of ERK1/2, AKT1, CDH1, CDH2, VIM, and CCND1 proteins. This indicates its role in controlling the growth and migration of oral cell cancers. The anticancer properties of L. barbarum berry can be attributed to the constituents in the berry. L. barbarum berry contains abundant polysaccharides (LBPs), scopoletin, flavonoids, vitamin C analogs, carotenoids (β-carotene and zeaxanthin), β-sitosterol, cerebroside, betaine, amino acids, minerals, and vitamins (in particular, riboflavin and thiamin). Among all these constituents, the major active anticancer compounds in L. barbarum include scopoletin, LBPs, and 2-O-bD-glucopyranosyl-L-ascorbic acid. 20 – 22 These compounds are known for their anticancer, antioxidant, and immunomodulatory properties against important mediators for cell cycles such as ERK, Cyclin D, and AKT. 20 , 27 , 29

ERKs and AKT are some of the most crucial proteins that modulate cancer cell survival and proliferation. AKT helps in metastasis and is associated with the aggressiveness of the tumor. 36 AKT activation even inhibits the expression of proapoptotic proteins, such as BAD and BAX, and allows the cancer cells to survive. 37 , 38 AKT can also inactivate the caspase enzymes, which are directly involved in cell apoptosis and forkhead box protein O1 (FOXO-1) expression. This also increases the risk of cell proliferation. AKT can also upregulate cyclin D1, another critical mediator regulating cells to pass the G1 phase of the cell cycle and enter the S phase of the cell cycle. Our results found a reduction in ERK1/2, CCND1, and AKT1 expression, and these findings are important as they indicate a positive effect of EELB in controlling the proliferation and survival of cancer cells. 35 – 38 High expression of CDH1 could also be related to its role in tumor differentiation and inhibition of metastases. High CDH1 levels could increase cellular adhesion in epithelial tissues and reduce the risk of invasion from the epithelium to the connective tissue. A significant decrease in CDH2 and VIM in the group treated with EELB compared to the untreated and vehicle control group also supports the anti-EMT properties of EELB and its role in inhibiting the migration of CAL-27 cells. The regulation of cyclins and cadherins indicates that EELB could prevent the transition from the G1 to the S phase of the cell cycle and EMT.

These results are similar to previous studies where L. barbarum was found to modulate the levels of cyclins and CDKs such as CDK2, cyclin E, and CCND. 25 Activation of EMT signaling helps in cell invasion and migration. Besides, studies have reported that EMT activation can promote the migration of cells. Besides, several studies have reported that EMT inhibition could inhibit cell migration and proliferation. 34 – 38 Previous studies have shown that L. barbarum can inhibit the cell cycle by regulating the expression of p53, p21, and BAX. 23 Zhang et al. and Luo et al. found that L. barbarum can break the strands of DNA and induce apoptosis with reduced BCL-2/BAX expression. 35 , 36 , 38 , 39 According to Cao et al. (1994), L. barbarum can even activate the macrophages and reduce lipid peroxidation, resulting in the death of cancer cells. 36 Additionally, LBPs can affect the natural-killer cells (NKs), which in turn enhance the expression of Interferon-gamma and activate the receptor NKP30 on its surface. This increases the secretion of perforin and may induce the lysis of cancer cells. 40 – 44 Based on our results and the existing evidence supporting the anticancer properties of Lycium barbarum, these results must be validated and confirmed by future clinical and patient-based studies.

 5. Conclusion

L. barbarum has shown good anticancer properties in in-vitro settings. However, one should further explore its efficacy via clinical trials for treating oral cancer. Further studies can aim to evaluate and compare the role of L. barbarum compared to other anti-cancer agents. Additionally, future research at molecular and genomic levels can be undertaken to evaluate the other molecular mechanisms, signaling pathways, and genes by administrating L. barbarum in patients with OSCC . This evidence could help to develop novel therapeutic strategies for the management of one of the major public health and economic burdens, oral cancer.

Ethical considerations

The study was conducted after receiving ethical approval from Kasturba Medical College and Kasturba Hospital Ethic committee with IEC no (460/2019).

 Data Availability

Figshare: [Raw data for effect of goji berry on CAL-27 cell lines (oral squamous cell carcinoma cell line]. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.21716309. 45

The data is also available upon request via email to Dr. Aditi Chopra (email id: aditi.chopra@manipal.edu).

Data are available under the terms of the Creative Commons Zero “No rights reserved” data waiver (CC0 1.0 Public domain dedication)

 Acknowledgements

We acknowledge Dr. TMA Pai Structured Ph.D. fellowship program of MAHE, and senior research fellowship from ICMR (Reference ID2019/4115/CMB/BMS), Government of India, for financial assistance to Divya Adiga. All the authors thank Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal for infrastructure support.

 References Wong T Wiesenfeld D : Oral Cancer. Aust. Dent. J. 2018;63:S91–S99. 10.1111/adj.12594 Montero PH Patel SG : Cancer of the oral cavity. Surg. Oncol. Clin. N. Am. 2015;24(3):491–508. 25979396 10.1016/J.SOC.2015.03.006 PMC5018209 Sharma S Satyanarayana L Asthana S : Oral cancer statistics in India on the basis of the first report of 29 population-based cancer registries. J. Oral. Maxillofac. Pathol. 2018;22(1):18–26. 29731552 10.4103/jomfp.JOMFP_113_17 Borse V Konwar AN Buragohain P : Oral cancer diagnosis and perspectives in India. Sens. Int. 2020;1:100046. 34766046 10.1016/j.sintl.2020.100046 PMC7515567 Bagan J Sarrion G Jimenez Y : Oral cancer: Clinical features. Oral Oncol. 2010;46(6):414–417. 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2010.03.009 Ram H Sarkar J Kumar H : Oral Cancer: Risk Factors and Molecular Pathogenesis. J. Maxillofac. Oral. Surg. 2011;10(2):132–137. 22654364 10.1007/s12663-011-0195-z PMC3177522 Su SC Chang LC Lin CW : Mutational signatures and mutagenic impacts associated with betel quid chewing in oral squamous cell carcinoma. Hum. Genet. 2019;138(11-12):1379–1389. 31679052 10.1007/s00439-019-02083-9 Thiruppathy M Kishore Kumar S Amaladas J : Tobacco: An overview. Drug Invention Today. 2019;12(3):532–536. Kalavrezos N Bhandari R : Current trends and future perspectives in the surgical management of oral cancer. Oral Oncol. 2010;46(6):429–432. 20381408 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2010.03.007 Nurgali K Jagoe RT Abalo R : Editorial: Adverse Effects of Cancer Chemotherapy: Anything New to Improve Tolerance and Reduce Sequelae? Front. Pharmacol. 2018;9:245. 29623040 10.3389/fphar.2018.00245 PMC5874321 Wang H Khor TO Shu L : Plants vs. cancer: a review on natural phytochemicals in preventing and treating cancers and their druggability. Anti Cancer Agents Med. Chem. 2012;12(10):1281–1305. 22583408 10.2174/187152012803833026 PMC4017674 WHO: Who global report on traditional and complementary medicine 2019. 2019. (accessed on 19 December 2021). Reference Source Schoonees A Visser J Musekiwa A : Pycnogenol® (extract of French maritime pine bark) for the treatment of chronic disorders. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2012;18(4):CD008294. 10.1002/14651858.CD008294.pub4 Newman DJ Cragg GM : Natural Products as Sources of New Drugs from 1981 to 2014. J. Nat. Prod. 2016;79(3):629–661. 26852623 10.1021/acs.jnatprod.5b01055 Seca AML Pinto DCGA : Plant Secondary Metabolites as Anticancer Agents: Successes in Clinical Trials and Therapeutic Application. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018 16;19(1):263. 29337925 10.3390/ijms19010263 PMC5796209 Lichota A Gwozdzinski K : Anticancer Activity of Natural Compounds from Plant and Marine Environment. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018 9;19(11):3533. 30423952 10.3390/ijms19113533 PMC6275022 Talib WH Alsayed AR Barakat M : Targeting Drug Chemo-Resistance in Cancer Using Natural Products. Biomedicines. 2021;9(10). 34680470 10.3390/biomedicines9101353 PMC8533186 Nisar S Masoodi T Prabhu KS : Natural products as chemo-radiation therapy sensitizers in cancers. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2022;154:113610. 36030591 10.1016/j.biopha.2022.113610 King N Balneaves LG Levin GT : Surveys of Cancer Patients and Cancer Health Care Providers Regarding Complementary Therapy Use, Communication, and Information Needs. Integr. Cancer Ther. 2015;14(6):515–524. 26069277 10.1177/1534735415589984 Zhang Q Wang F Jia K : Natural Product Interventions for Chemotherapy and Radiotherapy-Induced Side Effects. Front. Pharmacol. 2018;9:1253. 30459615 10.3389/fphar.2018.01253 PMC6232953 Choudhari AS Mandave PC Deshpande M : Phytochemicals in Cancer Treatment: From Preclinical Studies to Clinical Practice. Front. Pharmacol. 2020;10. 32116665 10.3389/fphar.2019.01614 PMC7025531 Potterat O : Goji ( L. barbarum and L. chinense): Phytochemistry, pharmacology, and safety in the perspective of traditional uses and recent popularity. Planta Med. 2010;76(1):7–19. 19844860 10.1055/s-0029-1186218 Amagase H Farnsworth NR : A review of botanical characteristics, phytochemistry, clinical relevance in efficacy and safety of L. barbarum fruit (Goji). Food Res. Int. 2011;44(7):1702–1717. 10.1016/j.foodres.2011.03.027 Jin M Huang Q Zhao K : Biological activities and potential health benefit effects of polysaccharides isolated from L. barbarum L. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2013;54(1):16–23. 23200976 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2012.11.023 Wang Z Liu Y Sun Y : Structural characterization of LbGp1 from the fruits of L. barbarum L. Food Chem. 2014;159:137–142. 24767036 10.1016/j.foodchem.2014.02.171 Yang RF Zhao C Chen X : Different methods extract the chemical properties and bioactivities of Goji (Lycium barbarum) polysaccharides. J. Functional Foods. 2015;17:903–909. 10.1016/j.jff.2015.06.045 Luo Q Li Z Yan J : L. barbarum polysaccharides induce apoptosis in human prostate cancer cells and inhibits prostate cancer growth in a xenograft mouse model of human prostate cancer. J. Med. Food. 2009;12(4):695–703. 19735167 10.1089/jmf.2008.1232 Miao Y Xiao B Jiang Z : Growth inhibition and cell-cycle arrest of human gastric cancer cells by L. barbarum polysaccharide. Med. Oncol. 2010;27(3):785–790. 10.1007/s12032-009-9286-9 Mao F Xiao B Jiang Z : Anticancer effect of L. barbarum polysaccharides on colon cancer cells involves G0/G1 phase arrest. Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England). 2011;28(1):121–126. 10.1007/s12032-009-9415-5 Shen L Du G : L. barbarum polysaccharide stimulates proliferation of MCF-7 cells by the ERK pathway. Life Sci. 2012;91(9–10):353–357. 22921303 10.1016/j.lfs.2012.08.012 Cheng J Zhou ZW Sheng HP : An evidence-based update on the pharmacological activities and possible molecular targets of L. barbarum polysaccharides. Drug Des. Devel. Ther. 2014;17(9):33–78. 10.2147/DDDT.S72892 Kwok SS Bu Y Lo AC : A Systematic Review of Potential Therapeutic Use of L. barbarum Polysaccharides in Disease. Biomed. Res. Int. 2019;2019(12):1–18. 10.1155/2019/4615745 Tian X Liang T Liu Y : Extraction, Structural Characterization, and Biological Functions of L. barbarum Polysaccharides: A Review. Biomolecules. 2019; 21;9(9):389. 31438522 10.3390/biom9090389 PMC6770593 Kaufmann B Christen P : Recent extraction techniques for natural products: microwave-assisted extraction and pressurised solvent extraction. Phytochem. Anal. 2002;13(2):105–113. 12018022 10.1002/pca.631 Meerloo J van Kaspers GJ Cloos J : Cell sensitivity assays: the MTT assay. Methods Mol. Biol. 2011;731:237–245. 10.1007/978-1-61779-080-5_20 Liang CC Park AY Guan JL : In vitro scratch assay: a convenient and inexpensive method for analysis of cell migration in vitro. Nat. Protoc. 2007;2(2):329–333. 17406593 10.1038/nprot.2007.30 Franken NA Rodermond HM Stap J : Clonogenic assay of cells in vitro. Nat. Protoc. 2006;1(5):2315–2319. 10.1038/nprot.2006.339 Bhat S Adiga D Shukla V : Metastatic suppression by DOC2B is mediated by inhibition of epithelial-mesenchymal transition and induction of senescence. Cell Biol. Toxicol. 2021 Mar 24;38:237–258. 33758996 10.1007/s10565-021-09598-w PMC8986756 Hong KO Kim JH Hong JS : Inhibition of Akt activity induces the mesenchymal-to-epithelial reverting transition with restoring E-cadherin expression in KB and KOSCC-25B oral squamous cell carcinoma cells. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 2009 26;28(1):28. 19243631 10.1186/1756-9966-28-28 PMC2651854 Zhang M Chen H Huang J : Effect of L. barbarum polysaccharide on human hepatoma QGY7703 cells: inhibition of proliferation and induction of apoptosis. Life Sci. 2005;18;76(18):2115–2124. 15826878 10.1016/j.lfs.2004.11.009 Cao GW Yang WG Du P : Observation of the effects of LAK/IL-2 therapy combining with L. barbarum polysaccharides in the treatment of 75 cancer patients. Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 1994;16(6):428–431. Harsha C Banik K Ang HL : Targeting AKT/mTOR in Oral Cancer: Mechanisms and Advances in Clinical Trials. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020;21(9):3285. 32384682 10.3390/ijms21093285 PMC7246494 Lim J Kim JH Paeng JY : Prognostic value of activated Akt expression in oral squamous cell carcinoma. J. Clin. Pathol. 2005;58(11):1199–1205. 16254112 10.1136/jcp.2004.024786 PMC1770780 Huyan T Li Q Yang H : Protective effect of polysaccharides on simulated microgravity-induced functional inhibition of human NK cells. Carbohydr. Polym. 2014;101:819–827. 24299844 10.1016/j.carbpol.2013.10.021 Chopra A : Raw data for effect of goji berry on CAL-27 cell lines (oral squamous cell carcinoma cell line). figshare. Figure. 2022. 10.6084/m9.figshare.21716309.v1 10.5256/f1000research.141919.r159541 Reviewer response for version 1 Rajendran Poornima 1 Referee https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7450-707X Department of Periodontology, Sri Ramakrishna Dental College and Hospital, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India

Competing interests: No competing interests were disclosed.

 30 1 2023 Copyright: © 2023 Rajendran P 2023 This is an open access peer review report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. recommendation approve

Many anti-oxidants have been tried and tested in the filed of dental medicine. The authors have used Goji berry in the present article. Though the methodology is quite similar to many other materials used so far, the authors have explained why goji berry can be employed to treat oral diseases. Especially their adequate discussion for their test results convinces the reader regarding the potential of the aforementioned agent. 

Pros of the study:

Well explained methodology.

Discussion adequately justifies the results.

Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?

Yes

If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?

Yes

Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?

Yes

Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?

Yes

Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?

Yes

Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?

Yes

Reviewer Expertise:

Periodontology and Implantology

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard.

Chopra Aditi Periodontology, Manipal College of Dental Sciences, Manipal, Manipal, India

Competing interests: No competing interests were disclosed.

 31 1 2023

Firstly we would like to thank the reviewers for spending their valuable time reading our work and understanding the importance of natural alternatives to treat oral disease, especially cancer, especially in current times where many medicine and therapy are becoming less effective or have many side effects. We have revised the manuscript according to the reviewers' comments and corrected the typo errors.

Thank you.

 10.5256/f1000research.141919.r159537 Reviewer response for version 1 Ray Swagat 1 Referee https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8034-7706 University of Lincoln, Lincoln, UK

Competing interests: No competing interests were disclosed.

 30 1 2023 Copyright: © 2023 Ray S 2023 This is an open access peer review report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. recommendation approve

The article discusses a study that aimed to evaluate the anticancer properties of the herb Lycium barbarum (commonly known as Goji berry) against oral squamous cell carcinoma. The study used an ethanolic extract of L. barbarum (EELB) and tested its effects on cancer cell growth, proliferation, and migration in vitro. The study found that EELB impeded the growth, proliferation and migration of oral cancer cells and reduced the phosphorylation of certain signaling proteins associated with cancer cell growth. The study also showed that EELB affected the expression of certain proteins involved in the process of epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), a process that allows cancer cells to become more invasive.

The results of the study suggest that Goji berry has good antiproliferative and anti-invasive properties against oral cancer cells. The study suggests that Goji berry could be tried as a potential anticancer agent to manage oral squamous cell carcinoma. However, it should be noted that this study was conducted in-vitro and further research is needed to confirm these findings in-vivo.

Thorough proofreading is also recommended to avoid typos (e.g., 'MTT assay' is written as 'MMT assay' in Figure 1; Figure 4B legends - it should be 'vehicle control' instead of 'vector control').

Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?

Yes

If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?

Yes

Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?

Yes

Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?

Yes

Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?

Yes

Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?

Yes

Reviewer Expertise:

Cell and molecular biology; proteomics; genomics; genome stability.

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard.

Chopra Aditi Periodontology, Manipal College of Dental Sciences, Manipal, Manipal, India

Competing interests: No competing interests were disclosed.

 31 1 2023

Firstly we would like to thank all the reviewers and the editors for taking the time out to review the paper. We are grateful for your valuable suggestions and comments.

Responses to the comments are as follows: 

1. comment 1: limitation of the study

Response: We have added the limitation of the present work at the end of the discussion and stated that the current work is done in-vitro settings and future studies should be done to explore the effect of goji berry in clinical settings.

2. comment 2: Thorough proofreading is also recommended to avoid typos (e.g., 'MTT assay' is written as 'MMT assay' in Figure 1; Figure 4B legends - it should be 'vehicle control' instead of 'vector control').

Response: We apologize for the errors from our end. We have rectified the typo errors in the revised manuscript and in the figure section.

Thank You.