<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.2 20190208//EN" "http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.2/JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" article-type="case-report" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="en">
    <front>
        <journal-meta>
            <journal-id journal-id-type="pmc">F1000Research</journal-id>
            <journal-title-group>
                <journal-title>F1000Research</journal-title>
            </journal-title-group>
            <issn pub-type="epub">2046-1402</issn>
            <publisher>
                <publisher-name>F1000 Research Limited</publisher-name>
                <publisher-loc>London, UK</publisher-loc>
            </publisher>
        </journal-meta>
        <article-meta>
            <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.12688/f1000research.122952.3</article-id>
            <article-categories>
                <subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
                    <subject>Case Report</subject>
                </subj-group>
                <subj-group>
                    <subject>Articles</subject>
                </subj-group>
            </article-categories>
            <title-group>
                <article-title>Case Report: Optical coherence tomography angiography findings in radiation retinopathy</article-title>
                <fn-group content-type="pub-status">
                    <fn>
                        <p>[version 3; peer review: 2 approved]</p>
                    </fn>
                </fn-group>
            </title-group>
            <contrib-group>
                <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
                    <name>
                        <surname>Ammari</surname>
                        <given-names>Wafa</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/">Conceptualization</role>
                    <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/">Data Curation</role>
                    <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/">Investigation</role>
                    <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/">Methodology</role>
                    <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/">Writing &#x2013; Original Draft Preparation</role>
                    <uri content-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7171</uri>
                    <xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c1">a</xref>
                    <xref ref-type="aff" rid="a1">1</xref>
                </contrib>
                <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
                    <name>
                        <surname>Zaghdoudi</surname>
                        <given-names>Asma</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/">Data Curation</role>
                    <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/">Investigation</role>
                    <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/">Writing &#x2013; Original Draft Preparation</role>
                    <uri content-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2075-1050</uri>
                    <xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c2">b</xref>
                    <xref ref-type="aff" rid="a1">1</xref>
                </contrib>
                <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no">
                    <name>
                        <surname>Berriche</surname>
                        <given-names>Olfa</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/">Formal Analysis</role>
                    <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/">Software</role>
                    <xref ref-type="aff" rid="a2">2</xref>
                </contrib>
                <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
                    <name>
                        <surname>Messaoud</surname>
                        <given-names>Riadh</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/">Project Administration</role>
                    <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/">Software</role>
                    <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/">Supervision</role>
                    <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/">Validation</role>
                    <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/">Writing &#x2013; Review &amp; Editing</role>
                    <xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c3">c</xref>
                    <xref ref-type="aff" rid="a1">1</xref>
                </contrib>
                <aff id="a1">
                    <label>1</label>Ophthalmology, University Hospital Taher Sfar, Mahdia, 5100, Tunisia</aff>
                <aff id="a2">
                    <label>2</label>Internal Medicine, University Hospital Taher Sfar, Mahdia, 5100, Tunisia</aff>
            </contrib-group>
            <author-notes>
                <corresp id="c1">
                    <label>a</label>
                    <email xlink:href="mailto:wafa.ammari@yahoo.fr">wafa.ammari@yahoo.fr</email>
                </corresp>
                <corresp id="c2">
                    <label>b</label>
                    <email xlink:href="mailto:zaghdoudiasma90@gmail.com">zaghdoudiasma90@gmail.com</email>
                </corresp>
                <corresp id="c3">
                    <label>c</label>
                    <email xlink:href="mailto:riadh_messaoud@yahoo.fr">riadh_messaoud@yahoo.fr</email>
                </corresp>
                <fn fn-type="conflict">
                    <p>No competing interests were disclosed.</p>
                </fn>
            </author-notes>
            <pub-date pub-type="epub">
                <day>25</day>
                <month>9</month>
                <year>2023</year>
            </pub-date>
            <pub-date pub-type="collection">
                <year>2022</year>
            </pub-date>
            <volume>11</volume>
            <elocation-id>968</elocation-id>
            <history>
                <date date-type="accepted">
                    <day>21</day>
                    <month>9</month>
                    <year>2023</year>
                </date>
            </history>
            <permissions>
                <copyright-statement>Copyright: &#x00a9; 2023 Ammari W et al.</copyright-statement>
                <copyright-year>2023</copyright-year>
                <license xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
                    <license-p>This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.</license-p>
                </license>
            </permissions>
            <self-uri content-type="pdf" xlink:href="https://f1000research.com/articles/11-968/pdf"/>
            <abstract>
                <p>We report the observation of a 31-year-old patient followed for a nasopharyngeal carcinoma since 2009, treated by locoregional radiotherapy, with a cumulative dose of 70 Gray. This case presented all ocular complications of radiotherapy; radiation retinopathy (RR), which is the most severe complication, could be diagnosed earlier and have a better prognosis if optic coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) was performed.</p>
                <p>She presented with a progressive decline in bilateral visual acuity. Ophthalmologic examination revealed bilateral posterior subcapsular cataract, radiation retinopathy, and optic neuropathy. The OCT B-scan showed more pronounced macular edema in the right eye. The OCTA revealed enlargement of the central avascular zone and loss of the deep and superficial retinal vascular network. The patient received three consecutive monthly intravitreal injections of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), without improvement in visual acuity.</p>
                <p>The aim of this case report is to present the contribution of OCT-A in the diagnosis of radiation maculopathy, and attribute these changes to ischemia at the level of the retinal vascular network.</p>
            </abstract>
            <kwd-group kwd-group-type="author">
                <kwd>Superficial retinal capillary plexus</kwd>
                <kwd>Deep retinal capillary plexus</kwd>
                <kwd>Ischemic cascade</kwd>
                <kwd>Radiation retinopathy</kwd>
                <kwd>OCT angiography</kwd>
            </kwd-group>
            <funding-group>
                <funding-statement>The author(s) declared that no grants were involved in supporting this work.</funding-statement>
            </funding-group>
        </article-meta>
        <notes>
            <sec sec-type="version-changes">
                <label>Revised</label>
                <title>Amendments from Version 2</title>
                <p>Optic coherence tomography angiography (OCT-A) is a non-invasive imaging technique that allows the retina to be 'scanned' and its vessels to be studied, providing images of retinal anatomy in 3 dimensions. Unlike conventional imaging techniques such as fluorescein angiography or indocyanine green angiography, OCT-A does not require intravenous injections of contrast agents and avoids serious allergic reactions that can occur. Compared with OCT, it shows the various chorioretinal vascular structures, in particular the areas of the superficial vascular plexus and the deep capillary plexus. We report a case of radiation retinopathy, a complication of the treatment of nasopharyngeal cancer by local radiotherapy, a rare and serious pathology that irreversibly compromises visual prognosis. The aim of this case report is to demonstrate the contribution of A-OCT in the diagnosis of radiation retinopathy and to confirm the ischemic origin of retinal vascular damage. In this new version, we have just changed the structure of the abstract to make readers more aware of the value of A-OCT in radiation retinopathy, and we have minimized the use of abbreviations to make the text easier to understand. The figures and references have not changed. The reviewers suggested these changes.</p>
            </sec>
        </notes>
    </front>
    <body>
        <sec id="sec1" sec-type="intro">
            <title>Introduction</title>
            <p>Locoregional radiotherapy is the gold standard treatment against nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC).
                <sup>
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
                </sup> The orbital proximity may lead to severe damage.
                <sup>
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">2</xref>
                </sup> However, late-onset, sight-threatening ocular complications may occur, including cataract, optic neuropathy, radiation retinopathy (RR), and ocular surface disease.
                <sup>
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">2</xref>
                </sup> The early diagnosis of these lesions allowed for better prognosis.
                <sup>
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
                </sup> The optical coherence tomography angiography (OCT-A) allowed us to investigate neovascular alteration for patients suffering from RR even before the onset of loss of vision.
                <sup>
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
                </sup>
            </p>
            <p>We reported a case of RR in a 31-year-old female with NPC, treated by locoregional radiotherapy. The patient presented all post-radiotherapy ocular complications with a late diagnosis of RR and a poor prognosis.</p>
            <p>The purpose of this case report was to analyze the findings and the usefulness of OCT-A.</p>
        </sec>
        <sec id="sec2">
            <title>Case report</title>
            <p>A 31-year-old Tunisian, unemployed female diagnosed with NPC in 2009 was treated by locoregional radiotherapy. The overall administered dose was about 75 Gray. The patient presented with adrenal insufficiency, hypothyroidism, and osteonecrosis as side effects of the treatment. She complained of progressive painless loss of vision in both eyes. On examination, her best-corrected visual acuity was 20/40 in both eyes. The ocular motility was full, and no afferent pupillary defect was noted. Symmetrical subcapsular cataract was noted. The rest of the anterior segment examination was unremarkable. No vitreous cells were noted. Fundoscopy showed microvascular changes mainly marked by vascular tortuosity and microaneurysms, optic disc pallor, and decreased foveal reflex. Fluorescein angiography was not performed because the patient was allergic to fluorescein. The optic coherence tomography (OCT) showed bilateral macular edema with a central macular thickness of 532 &#x03bc;m in the right eye and 406 &#x03bc;m in the left eye. The OCT-A disclosed enlargement of the central avascular zone, and hypoperfusion of both superficial and deep retinal capillary networks (
                <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">Figures 1</xref> and 
                <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">2</xref>). The vessel density was reduced to 38.12 % in the inferior macular area of the right eye, and to 39.34 % in the superior macular area of the left eye. A systemic workup was performed to rule out other causes of ischemic retinopathy such as diabetes mellitus, blood dyscrasias, and carotid insufficiency. Based on medical history, ocular findings, and negative systemic workup the diagnosis of RR was finally established. After informed consent, and a negative pregnancy test, the patient underwent three monthly intravitreal bevacizumab injections at 1.25 mg. The improvement of visual acuity was poor.</p>
            <fig fig-type="figure" id="f1" orientation="portrait" position="float">
                <label>Figure 1. </label>
                <caption>
                    <title>Right eye.</title>
                    <p>a. Fundoscopy showing vascular tortuosity and dilation of peripheral retinal vessels, the disappearance of foveolar reflection, and mild pallor of the optic disc.</p>
                    <p>b. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) showed macular edema.</p>
                    <p>c. OCT angiography (OCT-A) showing enlargement of the centralavascular zone, and hypoperfusion of both superficial and deep retinal capillary network.</p>
                </caption>
                <graphic id="gr1" orientation="portrait" position="float" xlink:href="https://f1000research-files.f1000.com/manuscripts/156359/8927f0bd-b62f-44e1-b187-f7bb2ee565ec_figure1.gif"/>
            </fig>
            <fig fig-type="figure" id="f2" orientation="portrait" position="float">
                <label>Figure 2. </label>
                <caption>
                    <title>Left eye.</title>
                    <p>a. Fundoscopy showing vascular tortuosity and dilation of peripheral retinal vessels, the disappearance of foveolar reflection, and mild pallor of the optic disc.</p>
                    <p>b. The optical coherence tomography (OCT) shows macular edema.</p>
                    <p>c. OCT angiography (OCT-A) showing enlargement of the central avascular zone, and hypoperfusion of both superficial and deep retinal capillary network.</p>
                </caption>
                <graphic id="gr2" orientation="portrait" position="float" xlink:href="https://f1000research-files.f1000.com/manuscripts/156359/8927f0bd-b62f-44e1-b187-f7bb2ee565ec_figure2.gif"/>
            </fig>
        </sec>
        <sec id="sec3" sec-type="discussion">
            <title>Discussion</title>
            <p>RR was first described in 1933 by Stallard,
                <sup>
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">3</xref>
                </sup> as a predictable complication of radiation exposure. It most commonly occurs between six months and three years after irradiation.
                <sup>
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">4</xref>
                </sup> In this case, the diagnosis was later, twelve years after irradiation. A higher total radiation dose is the highest risk factor, as the incidence of RR increases at doses greater than 45 Gray. Our patient received 75 Gray. Histopathological studies have illustrated a vasculopathy with the destruction of the endothelial cells followed by vascular occlusion and capillary dropout.
                <sup>
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">3</xref>
                </sup>
                <sup>,</sup>
                <sup>
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">4</xref>
                </sup> The microvascular alterations are associated with a reduction of retinal oxygenation, blood flow, and ischemia.
                <sup>
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">2</xref>
                </sup>
                <sup>&#x2013;</sup>
                <sup>
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">4</xref>
                </sup> Contrast sensitivity decrease and visual field impairment were notified in patients treated with radiotherapy.
                <sup>
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
                </sup> Our patient had gradually decreased bilateral visual acuity, as well as cataract and optic neuropathy. The clinical appearance mimics many lesions of diabetic retinopathy such as microaneurysms, macular edema, cotton-wool spots, retinal neovascularization, vitreous hemorrhage, and tractional retinal detachment.
                <sup>
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">4</xref>
                </sup> The main tests usually performed on patients are fluorescein fundus angiography and OCT. The first exam hallmarks are capillary dilatation and microaneurysms, frequently in combination with ischemia or macular edema.
                <sup>
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">5</xref>
                </sup> On OCT images, we found a disappearance of the macular depression with macular edema, and a significant thinning of the inner plexiform, inner nuclear, and outer plexiform layers.
                <sup>
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">5</xref>
                </sup> The fluorescein angiography is an invasive diagnostic technique. Intravenous dye injection may cause severe anaphylaxis, particularly in immunocompromised patients. It was not performed on our patient. Besides, OCT cannot capture vessel network status. Recently, OCT-A has been reported to be a safe and non-invasive examination that combines traditional OCT and Doppler shift. It can provide high-resolution images of each layer of the retina and quantify the retinal microvascular networks without the use of exogenous dyes. It is based on calculating the difference between signals, of moving structures, from two sequential OCT scans at the same position.
                <sup>
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">6</xref>
                </sup> OCT-A has been introduced for the detection of subtle microvascular changes in RR.
                <sup>
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref7">7</xref>
                </sup>
                <sup>,</sup>
                <sup>
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref8">8</xref>
                </sup> Vascular abnormalities are manifested by an enlargement of the central avascular zone and a reduction of vessel density in the deep vascular plexus of the foveal area. Whereas it is less reduced in superficial layers. The susceptibility of the deep layer can be explained by the direct connection of the superficial capillary plexus to the retinal arterioles with greater perfusion and oxygen supply.
                <sup>
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">3</xref>
                </sup> This change in structure can be explained by direct compression of the retinal vascular network, deep in the first place, by intra-retinal fluid cysts. Zijing 
                <italic toggle="yes">et al.</italic>
                <sup>
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
                </sup> reported that OCT-A detects early vascular alterations of the retina in patients with normal-ranged visual acuity. OCT-A provided a quantitative measurement of retinal capillary changes which may predict future development of radiation-induced retinal toxicity.
                <sup>
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">5</xref>
                </sup> Zijing 
                <italic toggle="yes">et al.</italic>
                <sup>
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
                </sup> suggested the implementation of OCT-A for the early detection and consistent monitoring of RR. In this sense, a grading system was proposed based on clinical findings in OCT-A, increased central macular thickness, evident cysts, and ophthalmoscopy findings.
                <sup>
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">5</xref>
                </sup> The disadvantage is the presence of several artifacts, especially after treatment. The treatment is inspired by diabetic retinopathy because of clinical and pathophysiological similarities.
                <sup>
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9">9</xref>
                </sup>
            </p>
            <p>Initially, treatments were based on the use of retinal laser.
                <sup>
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9">9</xref>
                </sup> Sector photocoagulation improves clinical signs, but the visual outcome is poor.
                <sup>
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9">9</xref>
                </sup> Intravitreal injection of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEG) or corticosteroids has been shown to improve visual acuity, reduce cystoid macular edema, and the risk of the development of RR.
                <sup>
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">3</xref>
                </sup>
                <sup>,</sup>
                <sup>
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9">9</xref>
                </sup> The visual acuity of our patient didn&#x2019;t change, probably because she presented with several complications of local radiotherapy, such as cataract and optic neuropathy, and ischemia affecting deep layers. Continuous treatment is necessary to maintain acuity improvement
                <sup>
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref8">8</xref>
                </sup>; this requires good patient adherence.
                <sup>
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9">9</xref>
                </sup> The optimal regimen for anti-VEGF therapy is not yet identified.
                <sup>
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref8">8</xref>
                </sup> There have been recent preventive efforts to avoid signs that radiation damage has already occurred, particularly since there is still no curative treatment.
                <sup>
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10">10</xref>
                </sup>
            </p>
        </sec>
        <sec id="sec4" sec-type="conclusions">
            <title>Conclusions</title>
            <p>The OCT-A findings of RR are an enlargement of the foveolar avascular zone and a rarefaction of the vascular network at the level of the deep and vascular networks, even in eyes without clinical evidence of RR.</p>
        </sec>
        <sec id="sec5">
            <title>Data availability</title>
            <p>All data are included as part of the article and no additional data are required.</p>
        </sec>
        <sec id="sec6">
            <title>Consent</title>
            <p>The patient has consented to the submission of the case report for submission to the journal.</p>
        </sec>
    </body>
    <back>
        <ref-list>
            <title>References</title>
            <ref id="ref1">
                <label>1</label>
                <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
                    <person-group person-group-type="author">

                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>Zijing</surname>
                            <given-names>L</given-names>
                        </name>

                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>Zongyi</surname>
                            <given-names>Z</given-names>
                        </name>

                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>Jianhui</surname>
                            <given-names>X</given-names>
                        </name>

                        <etal/>
</person-group>:
                    <article-title>Radiation-Induced Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography Retinal Alterations in Patients with Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma.</article-title>
                    <source>

                        <italic toggle="yes">Front Med (Lausanne).</italic>
</source>
                    <year>2020</year>;<volume>7</volume>:<fpage>630880</fpage>.</mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref2">
                <label>2</label>
                <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
                    <person-group person-group-type="author">

                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>Akagunduz</surname>
                            <given-names>OO</given-names>
                        </name>

                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>Yilmaz</surname>
                            <given-names>SG</given-names>
                        </name>

                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>Tavlayan</surname>
                            <given-names>E</given-names>
                        </name>

                        <etal/>
</person-group>:
                    <article-title>Radiation-Induced Ocular Surface Disorders and Retinopathy: Ocular Structures and Radiation Dose-Volume Effect.</article-title>
                    <source>

                        <italic toggle="yes">Cancer Res Treat.</italic>
</source>
                    <year>2021</year>;<volume>54</volume>:<fpage>417</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>423</lpage>.
                    <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4143/crt.2021.575</pub-id>
                </mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref3">
                <label>3</label>
                <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
                    <person-group person-group-type="author">

                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>Rose</surname>
                            <given-names>K</given-names>
                        </name>

                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>Krema</surname>
                            <given-names>H</given-names>
                        </name>

                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>Durairaj</surname>
                            <given-names>P</given-names>
                        </name>

                        <etal/>
</person-group>:
                    <article-title>Retinal perfusion changes in radiation retinopathy.</article-title>
                    <source>

                        <italic toggle="yes">Acta Ophthalmol.</italic>
</source>
                    <year>2018</year>;<volume>96</volume>(<issue>6</issue>):<fpage>e727</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>e731</lpage>.
                    <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29998553</pub-id>
                    <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/aos.13797</pub-id>
                </mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref4">
                <label>4</label>
                <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
                    <person-group person-group-type="author">

                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>Wang</surname>
                            <given-names>D</given-names>
                        </name>

                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>Au</surname>
                            <given-names>A</given-names>
                        </name>

                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>Duker</surname>
                            <given-names>JS</given-names>
                        </name>

                        <etal/>
</person-group>:
                    <article-title>PAMM and the ischemic cascade associated with radiation retinopathy.</article-title>
                    <source>

                        <italic toggle="yes">Am J Ophthalmol Case Report.</italic>
</source>
                    <year>2020</year>;<volume>20</volume>:<fpage>100918</fpage>.
                    <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32984654</pub-id>
                    <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ajoc.2020.100918</pub-id>
                </mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref5">
                <label>5</label>
                <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
                    <person-group person-group-type="author">

                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>Skalet</surname>
                            <given-names>AH</given-names>
                        </name>

                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>Liu</surname>
                            <given-names>L</given-names>
                        </name>

                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>Binder</surname>
                            <given-names>C</given-names>
                        </name>

                        <etal/>
</person-group>:
                    <article-title>Longitudinal Detection of Radiation-Induced Peripapillary and Macular Retinal Capillary Ischemia Using OCT Angiography.</article-title>
                    <source>

                        <italic toggle="yes">Retina.</italic>
</source>
                    <year>2020</year>;<volume>4</volume>(<issue>3</issue>):<fpage>320</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>326</lpage>.
                    <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31757690</pub-id>
                    <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.oret.2019.10.001</pub-id>
                </mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref6">
                <label>6</label>
                <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
                    <person-group person-group-type="author">

                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>Lains</surname>
                            <given-names>I</given-names>
                        </name>

                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>Wang</surname>
                            <given-names>JC</given-names>
                        </name>

                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>Cui</surname>
                            <given-names>Y</given-names>
                        </name>

                        <etal/>
</person-group>:
                    <article-title>Retinal applications od swept source optical coherence tomography (OCT) and optical coherence tompgraphy angiography (OCT-A).</article-title>
                    <source>

                        <italic toggle="yes">Prog Retinin Eye Res.</italic>
</source>
                    <year>2021 Sep</year>;<volume>84</volume>: 100951.
                    <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33516833</pub-id>
                    <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.preteyeres.2021.100951</pub-id>
                </mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref7">
                <label>7</label>
                <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
                    <person-group person-group-type="author">

                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>Seibel</surname>
                            <given-names>I</given-names>
                        </name>

                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>Vollhardt</surname>
                            <given-names>D</given-names>
                        </name>

                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>Riechardt</surname>
                            <given-names>AI</given-names>
                        </name>

                        <etal/>
</person-group>:
                    <article-title>Influence of Ranibizumab versus laser photocoagulation on radiation retinopathy (RadiRet) - a prospective randomized controlled trial.</article-title>
                    <source>

                        <italic toggle="yes">Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol.</italic>
</source>
                    <year>2020</year>;<volume>258</volume>(<issue>4</issue>):<fpage>869</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>878</lpage>.
                    <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32112140</pub-id>
                    <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00417-020-04618-7</pub-id>
                </mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref8">
                <label>8</label>
                <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
                    <person-group person-group-type="author">

                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>Fallico</surname>
                            <given-names>M</given-names>
                        </name>

                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>Chronopoulos</surname>
                            <given-names>A</given-names>
                        </name>

                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>Schutz</surname>
                            <given-names>JS</given-names>
                        </name>

                        <etal/>
</person-group>:
                    <article-title>Treatment of radiation maculopathy and radiation-induced macular edema: A systemic review.</article-title>
                    <source>

                        <italic toggle="yes">Surv Ophthalmol.</italic>
</source>
                    <year>2021</year>;<volume>66</volume>(<issue>3</issue>):<fpage>441</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>460</lpage>.
                    <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32918934</pub-id>
                    <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.survophthal.2020.08.007</pub-id>
                </mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref9">
                <label>9</label>
                <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
                    <person-group person-group-type="author">

                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>Say</surname>
                            <given-names>T</given-names>
                        </name>

                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>Ferenczy</surname>
                            <given-names>S</given-names>
                        </name>

                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>Magrath</surname>
                            <given-names>GN</given-names>
                        </name>

                        <etal/>
</person-group>:
                    <article-title>Image Quality and Artifacts on Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography: Comparison of Pathologic and Paired Fellow Eyes in 65 Patients with Unilateral Choroidal Melanoma Treated with Plaque Radiotherapy.</article-title>
                    <source>

                        <italic toggle="yes">Retina.</italic>
</source>
                    <year>2017</year>;<volume>37</volume>(<issue>9</issue>):<fpage>1660</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1673</lpage>.
                    <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1097/IAE.0000000000001414</pub-id>
                </mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref10">
                <label>10</label>
                <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
                    <person-group person-group-type="author">

                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>Reichstein</surname>
                            <given-names>D</given-names>
                        </name>
</person-group>:
                    <article-title>Current treatments and preventive strategies for radiation retinopathy.</article-title>
                    <source>

                        <italic toggle="yes">Curr Opin Ophthalmol.</italic>
</source>
                    <year>2015</year>;<volume>26</volume>(<issue>3</issue>):<fpage>157</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>166</lpage>.
                    <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25730680</pub-id>
                    <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1097/ICU.0000000000000141</pub-id>
                </mixed-citation>
            </ref>
        </ref-list>
    </back>
    <sub-article article-type="reviewer-report" id="report209186">
        <front-stub>
            <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5256/f1000research.156359.r209186</article-id>
            <title-group>
                <article-title>Reviewer response for version 3</article-title>
            </title-group>
            <contrib-group>
                <contrib contrib-type="author">
                    <name>
                        <surname>Sol&#x00e1;-Del Valle</surname>
                        <given-names>David</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <xref ref-type="aff" rid="r209186a1">1</xref>
                    <role>Referee</role>
                    <uri content-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5636-6720</uri>
                </contrib>
                <aff id="r209186a1">
                    <label>1</label>Department of Ophthalmology, Glaucoma Service, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Boston, MA, USA</aff>
            </contrib-group>
            <author-notes>
                <fn fn-type="conflict">
                    <p>
                        <bold>Competing interests: </bold>No competing interests were disclosed.</p>
                </fn>
            </author-notes>
            <pub-date pub-type="epub">
                <day>26</day>
                <month>9</month>
                <year>2023</year>
            </pub-date>
            <permissions>
                <copyright-statement>Copyright: &#x00a9; 2023 Sol&#x00e1;-Del Valle D</copyright-statement>
                <copyright-year>2023</copyright-year>
                <license xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
                    <license-p>This is an open access peer review report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.</license-p>
                </license>
            </permissions>
            <related-article ext-link-type="doi" id="relatedArticleReport209186" related-article-type="peer-reviewed-article" xlink:href="10.12688/f1000research.122952.3"/>
            <custom-meta-group>
                <custom-meta>
                    <meta-name>recommendation</meta-name>
                    <meta-value>approve</meta-value>
                </custom-meta>
            </custom-meta-group>
        </front-stub>
        <body>
            <p>They improved the report to my satisfaction.</p>
            <p>Are enough details provided of any physical examination and diagnostic tests, treatment given and outcomes?</p>
            <p>Yes</p>
            <p>Is the case presented with sufficient detail to be useful for other practitioners?</p>
            <p>Yes</p>
            <p>Is sufficient discussion included of the importance of the findings and their relevance to future understanding of disease processes, diagnosis or treatment?</p>
            <p>Yes</p>
            <p>Is the background of the case&#x2019;s history and progression described in sufficient detail?</p>
            <p>Yes</p>
            <p>Reviewer Expertise:</p>
            <p>Ophthalmology and glaucoma</p>
            <p>I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard.</p>
        </body>
    </sub-article>
    <sub-article article-type="reviewer-report" id="report209187">
        <front-stub>
            <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5256/f1000research.156359.r209187</article-id>
            <title-group>
                <article-title>Reviewer response for version 3</article-title>
            </title-group>
            <contrib-group>
                <contrib contrib-type="author">
                    <name>
                        <surname>Ben Saad</surname>
                        <given-names>Helmi</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <xref ref-type="aff" rid="r209187a1">1</xref>
                    <role>Referee</role>
                    <uri content-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7477-2965</uri>
                </contrib>
                <aff id="r209187a1">
                    <label>1</label>Faculty of Medicine of Sousse, Laboratory of Physiology, University of Sousse, Sousse, Tunisia</aff>
            </contrib-group>
            <author-notes>
                <fn fn-type="conflict">
                    <p>
                        <bold>Competing interests: </bold>No competing interests were disclosed.</p>
                </fn>
            </author-notes>
            <pub-date pub-type="epub">
                <day>26</day>
                <month>9</month>
                <year>2023</year>
            </pub-date>
            <permissions>
                <copyright-statement>Copyright: &#x00a9; 2023 Ben Saad H</copyright-statement>
                <copyright-year>2023</copyright-year>
                <license xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
                    <license-p>This is an open access peer review report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.</license-p>
                </license>
            </permissions>
            <related-article ext-link-type="doi" id="relatedArticleReport209187" related-article-type="peer-reviewed-article" xlink:href="10.12688/f1000research.122952.3"/>
            <custom-meta-group>
                <custom-meta>
                    <meta-name>recommendation</meta-name>
                    <meta-value>approve</meta-value>
                </custom-meta>
            </custom-meta-group>
        </front-stub>
        <body>
            <p>The authors have improved the quality of their paper. The paper can be published in its actual form.</p>
            <p>Are enough details provided of any physical examination and diagnostic tests, treatment given and outcomes?</p>
            <p>Yes</p>
            <p>Is the case presented with sufficient detail to be useful for other practitioners?</p>
            <p>Yes</p>
            <p>Is sufficient discussion included of the importance of the findings and their relevance to future understanding of disease processes, diagnosis or treatment?</p>
            <p>Yes</p>
            <p>Is the background of the case&#x2019;s history and progression described in sufficient detail?</p>
            <p>Yes</p>
            <p>Reviewer Expertise:</p>
            <p>Medical writing skills; physiology</p>
            <p>I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard.</p>
        </body>
    </sub-article>
    <sub-article article-type="reviewer-report" id="report188589">
        <front-stub>
            <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5256/f1000research.142080.r188589</article-id>
            <title-group>
                <article-title>Reviewer response for version 2</article-title>
            </title-group>
            <contrib-group>
                <contrib contrib-type="author">
                    <name>
                        <surname>Ben Saad</surname>
                        <given-names>Helmi</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <xref ref-type="aff" rid="r188589a1">1</xref>
                    <role>Referee</role>
                    <uri content-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7477-2965</uri>
                </contrib>
                <aff id="r188589a1">
                    <label>1</label>Faculty of Medicine of Sousse, Laboratory of Physiology, University of Sousse, Sousse, Tunisia</aff>
            </contrib-group>
            <author-notes>
                <fn fn-type="conflict">
                    <p>
                        <bold>Competing interests: </bold>No competing interests were disclosed.</p>
                </fn>
            </author-notes>
            <pub-date pub-type="epub">
                <day>26</day>
                <month>7</month>
                <year>2023</year>
            </pub-date>
            <permissions>
                <copyright-statement>Copyright: &#x00a9; 2023 Ben Saad H</copyright-statement>
                <copyright-year>2023</copyright-year>
                <license xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
                    <license-p>This is an open access peer review report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.</license-p>
                </license>
            </permissions>
            <related-article ext-link-type="doi" id="relatedArticleReport188589" related-article-type="peer-reviewed-article" xlink:href="10.12688/f1000research.122952.2"/>
            <custom-meta-group>
                <custom-meta>
                    <meta-name>recommendation</meta-name>
                    <meta-value>approve-with-reservations</meta-value>
                </custom-meta>
            </custom-meta-group>
        </front-stub>
        <body>
            <p>I read the revised version of the case report entitled &#x201c;Case Report: Optical coherence tomography angiography findings in radiation retinopathy&#x201d;.</p>
            <p> </p>
            <p> First, again the case report is interesting. However, I am really surprised by the fact that the authors have not to corrected their paper according to my previous remarks, which were sent almost 1 year ago (50% of my previous remarks were neglected). I have no explication to this situation.</p>
            <p> </p>
            <p> If an author refuses to apply the recommendations made by a reviewer, the author should provide a detailed and well-reasoned response explaining their rationale. The response should address each point raised by the reviewer and explain why the author believes their current approach is valid. It is essential for the author to be respectful and professional in their response, as well as to back their arguments with relevant evidence or references when applicable. In some cases, there may be legitimate reasons for an author to disagree with certain recommendations, such as limitations of the study, available resources, or differences in interpretation. However, it is important to note that the review process aims to improve the quality of the paper, and authors should carefully consider reviewer feedback before making their final decision.</p>
            <p> </p>
            <p> Below if my review, (almost the one I sent 1 year ago).</p>
            <p> </p>
            <p> 
                <bold>A.</bold> I recommend that authors apply the CARE (Consensus-based Clinical Case Reporting) guidelines (
                <bold>see reference 1 below</bold>).</p>
            <p> The CARE guidelines are designed to improve the quality and transparency of clinical case reports. The benefits of using the CARE guidelines, are outlined in the article.&#x00a0;</p>
            <p> </p>
            <p> Overall, the CARE guidelines offer a comprehensive and standardized approach to reporting clinical case reports, which can lead to improved transparency, quality, and educational value, benefiting both researchers and healthcare professionals.</p>
            <p> </p>
            <p> 
                <bold>B. </bold>The authors are also asked to full in (and submit) the CARE checklist (see reference 2 below)</p>
            <p> </p>
            <p> 
                <bold>C. ABSTRACT</bold>
            </p>
            <p> </p>
            <p> I recommend that authors apply the IOC: Introduction, observation, Conclusion</p>
            <p> </p>
            <p> L5: we found radiation retinopathy (RR), and l11 we should find RR not radiation retinopathy</p>
            <p> Sometimes OCTA (line 8) and line 18, we note OCT-A (is it OCTA or OCT-A?)? Use one expression and avoid elegant variation of terms</p>
            <p> </p>
            <p> L9: Change She presented by The patient presented</p>
            <p> </p>
            <p> L16: delete (VEGF) used one time in the abstract</p>
            <p> </p>
            <p> 
                <bold>D.</bold> All abbreviations should be explained the first time they are used - unless it is a standard unit of measurement - and thereafter the use of abbreviations should be consistent throughout the paper. Avoid excessive use of abbreviations.</p>
            <p> For examples,</p>
            <p> </p>
            <p> 
                <bold>E. </bold>The paper should be proofread (this is a MAJOR remark).</p>
            <p> </p>
            <p> 
                <bold>F</bold>. 
                <bold>MANUSCRIPT</bold>
            </p>
            <p> </p>
            <p> *In the beginning of the section Case Report, the authors are asked to write the following sentence:</p>
            <p> This case report followed the CARE guideline (add the reference)</p>
            <p> </p>
            <p> *The patient received 70 Gy (see the abstract) or 75 Gy (see the observation and the discussion)? More rigor is needed.</p>
            <p> </p>
            <p> *Change the sentence &#x201c;fluorescein fundus angiography (FFA) and optical coherence tomography (OCT).&#x201d; by &#x201c;fluorescein fundus angiography (FFA) and OCT.&#x201d;</p>
            <p> </p>
            <p> *Inside the text we find Zihing 1 (but in reference 1, we note Zijing): so is it Zihing or Zijing.</p>
            <p> </p>
            <p> *VEGF was not defined in the text (the abstract and the text are 2 different documents)</p>
            <p> </p>
            <p> Please add a subsection called: Limitations</p>
            <p> </p>
            <p> 
                <bold>References</bold> 
                <list list-type="order">
                    <list-item>
                        <p>Gagnier JJ, et al The CARE Guidelines: Consensus-based Clinical Case Reporting Guideline Development. Glob Adv Health Med. 2013 Sep;2(5):38-43. doi: 10.7453/gahmj.2013.008. PMID: 24416692. 
                            <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.7453/gahmj.2013.008">https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.7453/gahmj.2013.008</ext-link>
                        </p>
                    </list-item>
                    <list-item>
                        <p>CARE Checklist of information to include when writing a case report: 
                            <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5db7b349364ff063a6c58ab8/t/5db7bf175f869e5812fd4293/1572323098501/CARE-checklist-English-2013.pdf">https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5db7b349364ff063a6c58ab8/t/5db7bf175f869e5812fd4293/1572323098501/CARE-checklist-English-2013.pdf</ext-link>
                        </p>
                    </list-item>
                </list>
            </p>
            <p>Are enough details provided of any physical examination and diagnostic tests, treatment given and outcomes?</p>
            <p>Yes</p>
            <p>Is the case presented with sufficient detail to be useful for other practitioners?</p>
            <p>Yes</p>
            <p>Is sufficient discussion included of the importance of the findings and their relevance to future understanding of disease processes, diagnosis or treatment?</p>
            <p>Yes</p>
            <p>Is the background of the case&#x2019;s history and progression described in sufficient detail?</p>
            <p>Yes</p>
            <p>Reviewer Expertise:</p>
            <p>Medical writing skills; physiology</p>
            <p>I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard, however I have significant reservations, as outlined above.</p>
        </body>
        <back>
            <ref-list>
                <title>References</title>
                <ref id="rep-ref-188589-1">
                    <label>1</label>
                    <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
                        <person-group person-group-type="author"/>:
                        <article-title>The CARE Guidelines: Consensus-based Clinical Case Reporting Guideline Development.</article-title>
                        <source>
                            <italic>Glob Adv Health Med</italic>
                        </source>.<year>2013</year>;<volume>2</volume>(<issue>5</issue>) :
                        <elocation-id>10.7453/gahmj.2013.008</elocation-id>
                        <fpage>38</fpage>-<lpage>43</lpage>
                        <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24416692</pub-id>
                        <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7453/gahmj.2013.008</pub-id>
                    </mixed-citation>
                </ref>
                <ref id="rep-ref-188589-2">
                    <label>2</label>
                    <mixed-citation>
                        <person-group person-group-type="author"/>:
                        <article-title>Checklist of information to include when writing a case report</article-title>.
                        <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5db7b349364ff063a6c58ab8/t/5db7bf175f869e5812fd4293/1572323098501/CARE-checklist-English-2013.pdf">Reference source</ext-link>
                    </mixed-citation>
                </ref>
            </ref-list>
        </back>
    </sub-article>
    <sub-article article-type="reviewer-report" id="report165708">
        <front-stub>
            <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5256/f1000research.135008.r165708</article-id>
            <title-group>
                <article-title>Reviewer response for version 1</article-title>
            </title-group>
            <contrib-group>
                <contrib contrib-type="author">
                    <name>
                        <surname>Sol&#x00e1;-Del Valle</surname>
                        <given-names>David</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <xref ref-type="aff" rid="r165708a1">1</xref>
                    <role>Referee</role>
                    <uri content-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5636-6720</uri>
                </contrib>
                <aff id="r165708a1">
                    <label>1</label>Department of Ophthalmology, Glaucoma Service, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Boston, MA, USA</aff>
            </contrib-group>
            <author-notes>
                <fn fn-type="conflict">
                    <p>
                        <bold>Competing interests: </bold>No competing interests were disclosed.</p>
                </fn>
            </author-notes>
            <pub-date pub-type="epub">
                <day>11</day>
                <month>4</month>
                <year>2023</year>
            </pub-date>
            <permissions>
                <copyright-statement>Copyright: &#x00a9; 2023 Sol&#x00e1;-Del Valle D</copyright-statement>
                <copyright-year>2023</copyright-year>
                <license xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
                    <license-p>This is an open access peer review report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.</license-p>
                </license>
            </permissions>
            <related-article ext-link-type="doi" id="relatedArticleReport165708" related-article-type="peer-reviewed-article" xlink:href="10.12688/f1000research.122952.1"/>
            <custom-meta-group>
                <custom-meta>
                    <meta-name>recommendation</meta-name>
                    <meta-value>approve-with-reservations</meta-value>
                </custom-meta>
            </custom-meta-group>
        </front-stub>
        <body>
            <p>Overall, it's a well written report. One small discrepancy between the dose of Gray received (70 or 75?) in abstract and body of paper. I wish the introduction had a paragraph on OCTA (how does it work? and how is it different from regular OCT) for the general practitioner. I would encourage the writers to proof read the report one more time for typographical errors and syntax (ensure reading flows well, especially the abstract). It would also be important to better summarize data on OCTA in the discussion, especially data from trials or large studies that could be relevant to this patient.</p>
            <p>Are enough details provided of any physical examination and diagnostic tests, treatment given and outcomes?</p>
            <p>Yes</p>
            <p>Is the case presented with sufficient detail to be useful for other practitioners?</p>
            <p>Yes</p>
            <p>Is sufficient discussion included of the importance of the findings and their relevance to future understanding of disease processes, diagnosis or treatment?</p>
            <p>Yes</p>
            <p>Is the background of the case&#x2019;s history and progression described in sufficient detail?</p>
            <p>Yes</p>
            <p>Reviewer Expertise:</p>
            <p>Glaucoma/Ophthalmology</p>
            <p>I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard, however I have significant reservations, as outlined above.</p>
        </body>
        <sub-article article-type="response" id="comment9688-165708">
            <front-stub>
                <contrib-group>
                    <contrib contrib-type="author">
                        <name>
                            <surname>AMMARI</surname>
                            <given-names>WAFA</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <aff>University of Medecine Monastir, Tunisia</aff>
                    </contrib>
                </contrib-group>
                <author-notes>
                    <fn fn-type="conflict">
                        <p>
                            <bold>Competing interests: </bold>No competing interests were disclosed.</p>
                    </fn>
                </author-notes>
                <pub-date pub-type="epub">
                    <day>21</day>
                    <month>5</month>
                    <year>2023</year>
                </pub-date>
            </front-stub>
            <body>
                <p>Thank you for your interest to this article and for your precious remarks.</p>
                <p> The total dose was 75 Gray. We had introduced a paragraph about the difference between regular OCT and OCTA in introduction.&#x00a0; We had reported the necessary correction for the typographical errors and syntax and we had mad changes for abstract. There are not yet large studies in this topic (The OCT angiography findings in radiation retinopathy).</p>
            </body>
        </sub-article>
    </sub-article>
    <sub-article article-type="reviewer-report" id="report148253">
        <front-stub>
            <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5256/f1000research.135008.r148253</article-id>
            <title-group>
                <article-title>Reviewer response for version 1</article-title>
            </title-group>
            <contrib-group>
                <contrib contrib-type="author">
                    <name>
                        <surname>Ben Saad</surname>
                        <given-names>Helmi</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <xref ref-type="aff" rid="r148253a1">1</xref>
                    <role>Referee</role>
                    <uri content-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7477-2965</uri>
                </contrib>
                <aff id="r148253a1">
                    <label>1</label>Faculty of Medicine of Sousse, Laboratory of Physiology, University of Sousse, Sousse, Tunisia</aff>
            </contrib-group>
            <author-notes>
                <fn fn-type="conflict">
                    <p>
                        <bold>Competing interests: </bold>No competing interests were disclosed.</p>
                </fn>
            </author-notes>
            <pub-date pub-type="epub">
                <day>31</day>
                <month>8</month>
                <year>2022</year>
            </pub-date>
            <permissions>
                <copyright-statement>Copyright: &#x00a9; 2022 Ben Saad H</copyright-statement>
                <copyright-year>2022</copyright-year>
                <license xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
                    <license-p>This is an open access peer review report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.</license-p>
                </license>
            </permissions>
            <related-article ext-link-type="doi" id="relatedArticleReport148253" related-article-type="peer-reviewed-article" xlink:href="10.12688/f1000research.122952.1"/>
            <custom-meta-group>
                <custom-meta>
                    <meta-name>recommendation</meta-name>
                    <meta-value>approve-with-reservations</meta-value>
                </custom-meta>
            </custom-meta-group>
        </front-stub>
        <body>
            <p>I read with great interest the case-report entitled &#x201c;Case Report: Optical coherence tomography angiography findings in radiation retinopathy&#x201d;. The rationale of the study is interesting. However, a revision is needed.</p>
            <p> </p>
            <p> Here are my remarks:</p>
            <p> </p>
            <p> 
                <bold>GENERAL REMARKS</bold> 
                <list list-type="order">
                    <list-item>
                        <p>I recommend that authors apply the CARE guidelines
                            <sup>
                                <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="rep-ref-148253-1">1</xref>
                            </sup>.</p>
                    </list-item>
                    <list-item>
                        <p>For the abstract, I recommend that authors apply the IOC plan in the abstract: Introduction, observation, conclusion.</p>
                    </list-item>
                    <list-item>
                        <p>All abbreviations should be explained the first time they are used - unless it is a standard unit of measurement - and thereafter the use of abbreviations should be consistent throughout the paper. Avoid excessive use of abbreviations.</p>
                    </list-item>
                    <list-item>
                        <p>The paper should be checked by a person fluent in English.</p>
                    </list-item>
                    <list-item>
                        <p>Sometimes Gy sometime Gray: please use one term</p>
                    </list-item>
                    <list-item>
                        <p>The patient received 70 Gy (see the abstract) or 75 Gy (see the observation and the discussion)?</p>
                    </list-item>
                </list> 
                <bold>SPECIFIC REMARKS</bold>
            </p>
            <p> </p>
            <p> 
                <bold>1. Abstract:</bold>
            </p>
            <p> </p>
            <p> Some
                <bold> </bold>corrections are needed.&#x00a0;For example write &#x2018;A 31 year-old female&#x201d;, delete (RR) and (VEGF), write &#x201c;The patient presented with&#x2026;&#x201d;. Please use OCTA or OCT-A not both.</p>
            <p> </p>
            <p> 
                <bold>2. Manuscript:</bold> 
                <list list-type="bullet">
                    <list-item>
                        <p>Avoid abbreviating LE and RE, instead using full text: left-eye, right-eye.</p>
                    </list-item>
                    <list-item>
                        <p>Misuse of abbreviations: for examples, write &#x201c;*We report a case of RR in a 31-year-old&#x201d;, &#x201c;history of NPC was&#x201d;, &#x201c;treated by LRT&#x201d;, OCT-A disclosed enlargement&#x2019;, &#x201c;diagnosis of RR was finally&#x201d;, &#x201c;RR was first described in 1933&#x201d;, &#x201c;angiography (FFA) and OCT&#x201d;, &#x201c;microvascular changes in RR&#x201d;, &#x201c;the treatment of RR8&#x201d;, &#x201c;of RR. 3,8 The visual&#x201d;, &#x201c;complications of LRT&#x201d;, &#x201c;RR manifests itself&#x201d;, &#x201c;clinical evidence of RR&#x201d;.</p>
                    </list-item>
                    <list-item>
                        <p>More precision is needed: for example, L3 of the Case report, write &#x2018;The patient complained from &#x201c; rather than &#x201c;She complained from progressive&#x2019;. In this sentence (L11page 5/6) &#x201c;retinopathy, it inspired&#x201d;: it refers to what?</p>
                    </list-item>
                    <list-item>
                        <p>In the beginning of the case report, please mention the following sentence &#x201c;This observation was reported according to the CARE guidelines (ref)&#x201d;.</p>
                    </list-item>
                    <list-item>
                        <p>Some mistakes related to references: for examples you wrote &#x201c;by Stallard,3&#x201d;, but reference 3 is the one of Rose K 
                            <italic>et al.</italic>&#x00a0;You also wrote &#x201c;Li 
                            <italic>et al</italic>
                            <sup>1</sup> found&#x201d;, however the reference number 1 is of Zijing 
                            <italic>et al</italic>?</p>
                    </list-item>
                    <list-item>
                        <p>Some sentences are lacking references: for example, add a reference for these sentences: &#x201c;A higher total radiation dose is the highest risk factor, as the incidence of RR increases at doses greater than 45 Gy&#x201d;, &#x201c;However, FFA is an invasive diagnostic technique.&#x201d;, &#x201c;Intravenous dye injection used may cause severe anaphylaxis, particularly in immunocompromised patients&#x201d;.</p>
                    </list-item>
                </list> 
                <bold>3.&#x00a0;References:</bold>
            </p>
            <p> </p>
            <p> Please verify all your references, especially references number 1 and 3.</p>
            <p> </p>
            <p> 
                <bold>4.&#x00a0;Figures:&#x00a0;</bold>
            </p>
            <p> </p>
            <p> Figure 1 Title: c. OCT angiography showing&#x2026;.</p>
            <p> Figure 2 Title: c. OCT angiography showing&#x2026;.</p>
            <p>Are enough details provided of any physical examination and diagnostic tests, treatment given and outcomes?</p>
            <p>Yes</p>
            <p>Is the case presented with sufficient detail to be useful for other practitioners?</p>
            <p>Yes</p>
            <p>Is sufficient discussion included of the importance of the findings and their relevance to future understanding of disease processes, diagnosis or treatment?</p>
            <p>Yes</p>
            <p>Is the background of the case&#x2019;s history and progression described in sufficient detail?</p>
            <p>Yes</p>
            <p>Reviewer Expertise:</p>
            <p>Medical writing skills; physiology</p>
            <p>I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard, however I have significant reservations, as outlined above.</p>
        </body>
        <back>
            <ref-list>
                <title>References</title>
                <ref id="rep-ref-148253-1">
                    <label>1</label>
                    <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
                        <person-group person-group-type="author"/>:
                        <article-title>The CARE Guidelines: Consensus-based Clinical Case Reporting Guideline Development.</article-title>
                        <source>
                            <italic>Glob Adv Health Med</italic>
                        </source>.<year>2013</year>;<volume>2</volume>(<issue>5</issue>) :
                        <elocation-id>10.7453/gahmj.2013.008</elocation-id>
                        <fpage>38</fpage>-<lpage>43</lpage>
                        <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24416692</pub-id>
                        <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7453/gahmj.2013.008</pub-id>
                    </mixed-citation>
                </ref>
            </ref-list>
        </back>
        <sub-article article-type="response" id="comment8722-148253">
            <front-stub>
                <contrib-group>
                    <contrib contrib-type="author">
                        <name>
                            <surname>AMMARI</surname>
                            <given-names>WAFA</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <aff>University of Medecine Monastir, Tunisia</aff>
                    </contrib>
                </contrib-group>
                <author-notes>
                    <fn fn-type="conflict">
                        <p>
                            <bold>Competing interests: </bold>I didn't have any competing interests.</p>
                    </fn>
                </author-notes>
                <pub-date pub-type="epub">
                    <day>2</day>
                    <month>9</month>
                    <year>2022</year>
                </pub-date>
            </front-stub>
            <body>
                <p>
                    <bold>Thank you for the remarks and the attention paid to this original article. </bold>
                </p>
                <p> 
                    <bold>General remarks</bold>
                </p>
                <p> 1 and 2 we followed the journal recommendations.</p>
                <p> 3. All abbreviations were explained first time they are used. In ophthalmology, we always used abbreviations.</p>
                <p> 4. The paper was checked by newspaper experts who appreciated the English used.</p>
                <p> 5.Gy and Gray are both used, but we rectified this.</p>
                <p> 6.The patient received 75 Gy. It was a keyboard typo for the abstract.</p>
                <p> 
                    <bold>Specific remarks:</bold>
                </p>
                <p> 
                    <bold>1.Abstract:</bold>
                </p>
                <p> 
                    <bold>2.Manuscript:</bold>
                </p>
                <p> Stallard is the first person to describe this entities and this is mention in the article of Rose K et al.</p>
                <p> The Author&#x2019;s name is Zijing Li</p>
                <p> 
                    <bold>3.References:</bold>
                </p>
                <p> All references were verified</p>
                <p> 
                    <bold>4. Figures:</bold>
                </p>
                <p> The figures showing multimodal imaging. The OCT-A is the c only.</p>
                <p> 
                    <bold>For the other remarks, they have been &#x00a0;corrected on the article.</bold>
                </p>
            </body>
        </sub-article>
    </sub-article>
</article>
