Queervertising: An empowerment tool for the gay men and lesbian community

Background: Today’s society clams to be more inclusive, but there has been a lack of practical examination of this area. This study analyses how advertising and society interact and evolve in parallel, with advertising seeking to balance more traditional representations – in accordance with the Mirror Theory – with mainstreaming, which can influence social change. In this case, analysis is focused on the homosexual community. Methods: A content analysis of audiovisual advertising in Spain from the 1960s to 2021 is carried out in addition to a review of historical milestones and legislation. Results: The results evidence the transformation of advertising. The main findings show a shift from the total invisibility of the gay men and lesbian community in the 1960s to effective and respectful integration today. Conclusions: Queervertising is proposed as a new theoretical concept as the result of gender and sexual diversity being identified in advertising over time. The inclusion of gay men and lesbians in advertising is a current trend that, moreover, offers a challenge for brands. Although this turnaround in advertising creativity should be highlighted and recognized as being to some extent responsible for changes and social evolution, the commercial messages which are found today are still not always disruptive or excessively explicit, in order to avoid some rejection by audiences.


Introduction
Minorities have captured the attention of researchers from different disciplines although the societal impact from their representations in advertising remains a current question under exploration (Branchik & O'Leary, 2016;McDonald et al., 2020;Taylor & Costello, 2017;Yu, 2018;Zmuda, 2014). The dynamic interaction between society and advertising was pointed out by Pollay (1986, p. 18): "Advertising is without a doubt a formative influence in our culture", and continues to be supported by recent research, such as by Akestam et al. (2017) or McDonald et al. (2020), who assert that advertising reflects the times as well as social norms. In the same way that values change, advertising adapts and connects with the society on which it depends (Shinoda et al., 2021). In particular, the treatment of women in advertising and the representation of stereotypes and roles, as well as women's evolution and ability to contribute to their empowerment, has been extensively explored (Grau & Zotos, 2016), even introducing the concept of femvertising by Bahadur (2014). By extension, racial minorities have been addressed (Zmuda, 2014) and more recently the inclusion of gay men and lesbians in advertising imagery (Hetsroni, 2011;Holz Ivory, 2019;Iribure Rodrigues & Gallina Zanin, 2014;Madinga et al., 2020;McDonald et al., 2020;Oakenfull et al., 2008).
It is precisely the gay men and lesbian community that inspires the development of this research work. This group has also traditionally been stigmatized or made invisible in advertisements (McDonald et al., 2020;Ragusa, 2005). The purpose of this research is to delve deeper into how advertising and society interact with respect to the inclusion and positive treatment of gay men and lesbians, along with exploring the development of the group itself and the progressive recognition of their rights.
To achieve this objective, a content analysis of audiovisual advertising from 1960 to 2021 in Spain is used. Not only is representation quantified, but also, images and messages regarding sexual and amorous diversity are analyzed.
This study suggests that advertising simultaneously reflects the society of the moment while contributing to its evolution by promoting relevant social changes: tolerance, social inclusion, equality, women´s empowerment. In this case, the focus is normalization and inclusion of the LGBT community. Beyond advertising that has a cause, it is assumed that advertisers' interest in connecting with the gay men and lesbian community and the ethics of the brands themselves results in the use of a broader and more inclusive imagery. Consequently, this 'Queervertising' that takes place gives rise to a new theoretical concept, to analyse the phenomenon, and it provides a new insight into the core of advertising and social changes for researchers. This means reframing the research of advertising and including gay men and lesbians and contributing with practical ideas about the open-mindedness of brands as they seek to engage with stakeholders. There are identifiable themes of firstly, connecting with the gay and lesbian community and secondly, aligning with the increasingly gay-friendly attitude of society. Overall, Queervertising as a concept extends complexity and is complementary to the implementation of two seemingly opposing approaches by brands. On the one hand, their approach involves reaching out and empathizing with a traditionally marginalized group (LGBTIQ+s) and, on the other hand, searching for a balance because if the group portrayal in ads contradicts some consumer beliefs, the experience can be uncomfortable (Hetsroni, 2011;Ruggs et al., 2018). This theoretical proposal finds its parallel in femvertising (Bahadur, 2014) and acknowledges advertising's ability to empower, support and promote sexual and amorous diversity in a way that is respectful and consistent with the current reality. This paper is structured as follows. After this introduction, a review of the literature on gay men and lesbian imagery in advertising is conducted. The section then explains the methods of this study. The main results are presented next, followed by a discussion. The conclusions of the work then follow. Finally, the main limitations of the study, its practical implications, and future lines of research are considered.

Theoretical framework
A review of the literature shows that the most prolific time-frame with regard to the topic of gay men and lesbians and advertising has occurred in the last 10 years, coinciding with greater acceptance and the progressive disappearance of associated stigmas (Branchik & O'Leary, 2016). From 2000 onwards, the visibility of gay men and lesbians in advertising has been increasing (Branchik & O'Leary, 2016;Iribure Rodrigues & Gallina Zanin, 2014;McDonald et al., 2020). From this prism, a dual directionality and interaction of society and advertising is assumed, whereby advertising preserves traditional and majority values, as well as becoming a mainstreaming tool that favours social advances (Åkestam et al., 2017;McDonald et al., 2020;Mikkonen, 2010). In this framework, it is necessary to introduce the premises of the Mirror Theory (Abrams, 1953;Holbrook, 1987), which defends the idea that advertising reproduces the same patterns, behaviours and customs of the society in which it operates. Likewise, advertising can exercise its social function by bringing about social evolution and changes in favour of special collectives (Bahadur, 2014;Feng & Wu, 2009;Fowler & Thomas, 2015;McDonald et al., 2020;Zmuda, 2014). Regarding the focus of this research work, according to Schmidt and Stocker (2013, p. 180): "advertising and films evoke the masculine and feminine universesimultaneously they introduce changes according to the changes experienced in society". Therefore, advertising represents both the most deeply rooted social standards and those new trends or more progressive scenarios, even favouring their advancement.
Engagement with the target through the cause For brands, the positive effect of advertising is undisputed and it is often used to strengthen a connection with the target demographic. Åkestam et al. (2017) empirically demonstrate that those ad campaigns that include respectful representation of the LGBTIQ+ community increase the empathy of the recipients towards the company and the rest of society. Beyond the reputational benefit, Cunningham and Melton (2014) conclude that incorporating this theme in the creative axes results in improved business performance. Taylor and Costello (2017) indicate that in addition to improving performance, it contributes to the social responsibility of the brand. However, this effect does not occur as a generalizable maxim for all companies and for all targets, as using a cause for advertising and the consequent linked imagery must be managed with caution, because it can also create a critical environment if controversial or disruptive issues are involved (Gong, 2020;Holz Ivory, 2019).

Consumers' self-concepts and brands
The Social Identity Theory proposed by Taylor and Costello (1985) has been widely used in research works to show that the recognition of a portrayal that involves membership of a social group enhances people's self-image. Consequently, consumers can use brands to form their self-concept (Akermanidis & Venter, 2014). Several works evidence the contribution that can be made by advertising imagery to individuals' sexual identity (Chae et al., 2016;Gong, 2020;Holz Ivory, 2019;Mikkonen, 2010;Oakenfull et al., 2008). As result of this, the use of gay men and lesbians' subculture symbols in advertising, that reflect gay/lesbian identity, for instance referencing clothes, language, lifestyle etc, have meaning for the community and generate empathy with them (Oakenfull et al., 2008). By contrast, controversy can occur. On the one hand, a brand's image can be potentially harmed when a portion of the customer base is not represented or is negatively represented in ads (Gong, 2020). On the other hand, the portrayal of gay men and lesbianism in advertising imagery can annoy or inconvenience consumers, precisely because they don't see themselves as being represented, nor their beliefs, lifestyles etc (Akermanidis & Venter, 2014;Holz Ivory, 2019;Schmidt & Stocker, 2013). This dilemma for brands is often solved by mixing sexual advertisements that explicitly feature both gay men and lesbians and heterosexual models. Gong (2020, p. 916) points out that having "the portrayal of both models within the same message ensures their effectiveness due to the engagement with particular circumstances, [and the] lifestyle and feelings of each group". In the same vein, Bond and Farrell (2020) underscore that messages which are not explicit but are likely to be associated with both heterosexual or gay men and lesbians were generally still appealing for all targets.
According to this principle, each person finds a relationship between their self-concept and the environment or situations with which they identify and, by extension, sexual orientation also plays a key role in this respect. However, there is limited empirical research about how gay-themed advertising affects heterosexual consumers' perceptions (Holz Ivory, 2019;Madinga et al., 2020). These research works indicate that society has been increasingly accepting of gay men and lesbians' portrayals in advertising but there are significant peculiarities. For example, Holz Ivory (2019) in her study evidences that heterosexual men showed more negative attitudes towards gay male representation than towards heterosexual and lesbian ads. Madinga et al. (2020), for their part, add that the negative perception is higher in the case of heterosexual men than for women. In addition to sexuality, other variables inherent to viewers are analysed. Research works have highlighted that a positive or negative attitude to gay men and lesbians' portrayal in advertising can be explained due to age (there is more acceptance among young people) (Akermanidis & Venter, 2014;Schmidt & Stocker, 2013), the country of origin (developing countries are more receptive) (Akermanidis & Venter, 2014;Feng & Wu, 2009;Madinga et al., 2020), a country having strong traditional religious beliefs (Hetsroni, 2011), or the existence of gayfriendly attitudes (Madinga et al., 2020;Mikkonen, 2010;Orr et al., 2005).
Commercial and economic power of the gay men and lesbians community The last reason explaining the recent concern for depicting the LGBTIQ+ community in advertising has to do with its interest to companies. On the one hand, there is so-called gay power due to the community's purchasing power and its being an important part of the population. On the other hand, showing sympathy towards the gay movement attracts gayfriendly groups, which brands also wish to connect to.
It is estimated that 6% of the world's population is LGBTIQ+ (Jacob, 2017). Specifically, Spain has the second-highest proportion of this group in the world (6.9%), behind only Germany. In addition, Spain holds first place as a gay-friendly country when it comes to its acceptance and defence of gay rights (Poushter & Kent, 2020). Although there are no official statistics, studies such as that of Oakenfull and Greenlee (2005) show that the gay and lesbian community represents the highest per capita purchasing power of all minority groups in the United States; they even refer to this target as the "pink dollar". This is a market often idealized by specialists because of its profitability for companies (Akermanidis & Venter, 2014). Thus, the representation of gay men and lesbians in advertisements aims to connect with this public (Iribure Rodrigues, 2017;Read et al., 2019) while favouring a brand image that respects gay-friendly targets, who develop a superior feeling for firms that favour the acceptance of the movement in their creative strategy (Åkestam et al., 2017;Orr et al., 2005).
The challenge for advertisers in Spain, given the high representation of the collective, as well as the country's categorization as gay-friendly, leads us to assume that in its advertising imagery, the collective's representation may be significant, and interesting for deeper analysis.
Most studies, in addition to being recent, focus on the effect of advertising content reflecting gay men and lesbians and its consequences for brands: their acceptance/rejection (Angelini & Bradley, 2010;Branchik & O'Leary, 2016;Descubes et al., 2018;Holz Ivory, 2019;Iribure Rodrigues, 2017;Madinga et al., 2020;Ruggs et al., 2018;Um, 2014), advertising recall (Angelini & Bradley, 2010;Orr et al., 2005) or even the impact on people's purchasing intention (Akermanidis & Venter, 2014;Bond & Farrell, 2020;Holz Ivory, 2019;Orr et al., 2005;Um, 2014). In summary, most of the studies are conducted from a sociological and social perspective, but those that, like this one, focus on the power of advertising to promote a more inclusive society are scarcer (Gong, 2020;McDonald et al., 2020;Oakenfull & Greenlee, 2005;Ragusa, 2005). It is precisely this gap in the literature that underpins the research questions of this paper: RQ1. How has advertising imagery evolved with respect to gay men and lesbians since the 1960s in Spain?
RQ2. To what extent do the representations of relationship models that appear accompany the most relevant milestones and legislation in this field?
RQ3. What stance does advertising take on the diversity of love and sexuality in Spain?

Methods
In order to analyze the interaction between advertising and the advances and social reality of the gay men and lesbian collective, a qualitative approach is chosen, specifically a content analysis of audiovisual advertising spots from 1960 to 2021, in tandem with a review of the most relevant milestones and legislation of the LGBTIQ+ movement in Spain. According to Krippendorff (2004), its use is appropriate for the observation of trends; that is, with this type of analysis we will be able to highlight the changes in advertising over the last six decades.

Data collection
As mentioned, Spain has the second-highest proportion of LGBTIQ+ citizens in the world and holds first place as a gayfriendly country for its acceptance and defence of gay rights. These reasons lead us to assume that in advertising imagery, the representation of this collective may be significant and interesting for deeper analysis.
The selection of advertising spots was carried out after viewing all the spots collected in the main database of the Spanish Association of Advertisers (Asociación Española de Anunciantes, AEA); in addition, two complementary databases were added to complete the last decade, that of the El Publicista journal (El Publicista, 2021) and the Sanz'Channel (Sanz, 2016) (N=1408 spots). Finally, our sample consists of 63 spots. Only spots whose message or imagery depicted people and actions representing social relations or events that implicitly or explicitly included sexual and amorous diversity were included. The research has thus tried to identify ads with all the options or relationships beyond heterosexual "conventionality". It is, overall, a census sample, and consists entirely of commercial communication by brands that directly or indirectly targeted a topic. The sample comprises 63 advertisements because, during our review, this was the total number of relevant audiovisual ads from the total found for the period 1960-2021.
Additionally, it should be added that social campaigns launched by official organizations or associations in defence of LGBTIQ+ rights were excluded, since the object of the research was purely commercial advertising. There were a wide range of brands and kinds of product involved, utilizing content related to the targeted topic: insurance companies, agrifood and drinks businesses, technology and telecom operators, among others ( Table 2). The time period of analysis begins in 1960, coinciding with the first broadcasts of Televisión Española and the increase in the number of households with television sets. The spots are not distributed proportionally in each of the decades overall, due to the low number of relevant advertisements among the total number of ads broadcast over the targeted period. Thus, curiously, the same number of relevant advertisements (5) were identified for each of the decades between 1960-2010. On the other hand, for the period 2010-2021, 38 advertisements reflecting sexual and amorous diversity were found. Two issues should be noted: (1) the underrepresentation of gay men and lesbians in advertising is due to the dictatorial regime that existed in Spain until 1975;and (2), not all advertisements use the family and the couple in their creative strategy. A list of all ads selected can be found in Table 2.

Measurements, instruments and analysis
The research opted for was a qualitative study using a content analysis combined with a historical analysis to explore the possible relationship between the evolution of advertising with respect to the phenomenon of liberalization and inclusion of the LGBTIQ+ community, and the consequent sociocultural and legislative progress.
Basic information about the product offered, company and sector was extracted for each advertisement. General aspects were analyzed (target, slogan, etc.) and finally, details about the treatment of gay and lesbian couples in the ads. Table 1 shows the analysis sheet used for classification. Except for some variables about the identification and classification of images or discourse linked to gay men and lesbians, the variables are in relation with those commonly included in works on the treatment of advertising. Typically, this type of research includes information concerning product, sector, claim, target. The work of Molina Rodríguez-Navas et al. (2014) stands out because it laid the foundations of the method of analysis of audiovisual fiction and advertising as sources of knowledge of the past and present. Moreover, they underline the necessity to adapt content analysis to the particular focus of adverts under consideration. For its part, the identification of stereotypes in our approach is mainly supported by variables drawn from the work of Fowler and Thomas (2015) and Olivares et al. (2020), specifically variables 7 to 12 and 15 to 17. In any event, our research work involved some adaptation because previous literature focusing on the gay men and lesbian community is really scarce. Consequently, some original variables have been introduced, with the inclusion of variables 13, 14 and 18 in our analysis. The field of study cannot be analyzed without exploring some information about types of couple, and the traditionality of family and love models. The final analysis sheet was the result of a thorough review of literature and a discussion by three researchers in the first stage. After this, the fourth researcher did an analysis test with 5 ads, randomly chosen. The overall process allowed us to refine the analysis sheet for the goals of this research work. The detailed information for each variable used has been included in the calculation sheet shown in Table 1. Results for each advert under examination were recorded using Microsoft Excel spreadsheets in order to proceed to content analysis using the software Keycoder and Cloudwords, and to enable the calculation of some details such as percentages. Table 2 shows the list of advertisements analyzed in this research, including the name of the advertised brand, the decade of broadcast and the link to view the spot. Two researchers independently viewed the advertising directories and collections of advertisements described above to create the selection of 63 ads, and avoid bias. In cases where they did not agree on the choice of an advertisement, a third researcher made the decision on its suitability. However, this situation happened for two ads only.

Results
In order to give a clearer structure to the results section, evidence extracted from the content analysis associated with each decade is presented. Firstly, Table 3 shows the most relevant historical and legislative facts.
The variables included in the content analysis lead us to present the evolution of advertising and the treatment of gay men and lesbians within it.
Analysis associated with each decade 1960-1969: Franco's dictatorship Gay men and lesbians are made invisible, being a taboo subject. In none of the advertisements viewed is there any allusion to the diversity of sexual orientations. The family model shown is univocal and traditional, with the exclusive representation of heterosexual couples. To a greater extent, young couples are shown, and depending on the product advertised, they are shown with or without children. Gender roles are usually shown in a differentiated way, which is congruent if we take into account the historical and cultural context: Francoism.
All the advertisements that were broadcast went through Franco's censorship, and no prejudices or stereotypes were broadcast through advertising. Therefore, in this decade there is a relationship between advertising treatment and the legislative and social treatment of gay men and lesbians, making them completely invisible.

1970-1979: End of the dictatorship and early years of democracy in Spain
Advertisements continue to perpetuate a great difference between the gender roles of men and women, either through their content or by the way in which their storyline is delivered. For example, the mother continues to be assigned the  1960-1969 2. 1970-1979 3. 1980-1989 4. 1990-1999 5. 2000-2009 6. 2010-2021  responsibility of childcare, and the father the ownership of objects such as cars (as seen in the Nesquik ad, No. 6). In addition, it is emphasized that products such as alcohol are consumed exclusively by men (as in the case of González Byass's Soberano Cognac, with the slogan "It's a man's thing", ads Nos. 9 and 10). Particularly striking is the second González Byass ad (No. 10), which even shows a scene normalizing gender violence.
In this context, an univocal and traditional family and couple model is shown. Even in advertisements that claim to be inclusive, such as Coca Cola's (No. 8), the diversity of sexual orientations is ignored. Therefore, there is still a relationship between advertising treatment and the legislative and social treatment of gay men and lesbians.

1980-1989: Movements and social changes
Advertising in the 1980s experienced a process of modernization, in line with the rest of Spanish society.
As far as gender roles are concerned, there are ads in which a clear differentiation is evident (No. 11,by Monky;and No. 15,by Johnson), along with others in which they appear practically undifferentiated (No. 13, by Riera-Marsá; and No. 14, by Princesa). In the latter, a greater co-responsibility of men in domestic tasks can be observed compared to previous decades (No. 13). However, it is true that sometimes these men are still presented with a humorous and ridiculing tone, as if they are facing impossible tasks to perform (this is the case with No. 12, Scotch Brite).
In addition to all of the above, there is a greater normalization of sexuality and eroticism. For this purpose, puns and double meanings are used (advertisement No. 14, from Galletas Princesa). However, for the time being, the family model seems to remain unique and the couples represented are heterosexual and young.
We should remember that, in the 1980s, the process of protesting to demand rights and equality between heterosexuals and gay men and lesbians continued. The World Health Organization still considered gay men and lesbians "sick"; therefore, there was still no effective integration into society. In other words, there was still a relationship between the legal and sociocultural context and the reality reflected in advertisements.

1990-1999: Social openness and the evolution of equality
It should be noted that, as far as sexuality is concerned, the path of openness started in the previous decade continues. Usually, double meanings are still used when referring to this type of topic (No. 16,from Starlux;and No. 19, from Rumba Total), and advertisers manage to connect these ambiguities with the promotion of the product (for example, a woman with her partner saying "this one does it the way I like it", to promote the Starlux granulated broth).
During this decade, equality between gender roles began to be reflected more effectively. Men appear more frequently as jointly responsible for household chores and childcare (advertisements Nos. 16 and 18).
In addition, announcements begin to be made that little by little highlight the uniqueness and independence of being women. Ad No. 20, from Woman magazine, is a good example. Although this modernization was rather lax, it opened the door for women to want to feel beautiful in themselves, not for their husbands (the attitude changes regarding submission, from advertisements such as No. 1) and, the most interesting thing in our field study, opened the door to women who do not like men. Is the ad congruent with the evolution of advertising and that of the homosexual movement?
1. It is congruent 2. It is not congruent; it is detached from its sociocultural context Source: Own elaboration 1 Variables 10-12 have three categories. The difference between the first and the last option is that the first one will occur mainly in advertisements from the first decades, where homosexuality was a taboo subject. In the latter, homosexuality is presented naturally, without stereotyping. In the same way, it is worth noting the clear contrast in children's social relations between the advertisements of the 1960s/1970s and those made in the 1990s: in the former, boys and girls are shown playing separately, in different groups and with different toys (spots No. 2 and No.7), while in the latter they are shown playing together and cooperating (adverts Nos. 3 and 17).
The evolution in the concept of family and love follows the same lines as the evolution in gender roles: a lax openness. A representative case is No. 18, in which the Renault Laguna automobile is promoted and a father appears as the sole caregiver for his son, without a partner; therefore, it could favour selective perception by the viewer to consider him as a gay man, heterosexual or bisexual. However, given the social context in which it is inserted, the advertiser's intention was probably simply to awaken the patriarchal protective instinct.
Finally, the ad for the compilation album Rumba Total deserves a special mention. Although advertising about the transsexual collective is not the subject of this research, ad No. 19 is probably one of the first to allude to the LGBTIQ+ community in a clear way. In it, Cristina "La Veneno", a popular transgender woman of the 1990s, is presented as the protagonist, and a play on words is made between the pack of songs offered and her genitalia, recreating the famous legcrossing scene from the movie Basic Instinct.
Taking into account the above and that during this decade the depathologization of gay men and lesbianism took place, we can conclude that during the decade there was also a relationship between social advances and advertising treatment.  • (1936)(1937)(1938)(1939)(1940)(1941)(1942)(1943)(1944)(1945)(1946)(1947)(1948)(1949)(1950)(1951)(1952)(1953)(1954) Article 431 of the Penal Code (referring to public scandal, and using "good manners" as a reference) applied, so there was a subjective interpretation of the law: there was or was not an offence depending on how scandalous the observer considered it to be. However, its treatment did not vary much from how it had been treated since the end of the 19th century. • 1936: Official Francoist condemnation of the poet and playwright Federico García Lorca. • (1954Lorca. • ( -1970 In 1954, Francoism approved a reform of the 1933 Law of Vagrants and Miscreants and began to explicitly criminalize homosexuality. A change was made to article 2.2, making it possible to declare "homosexuals, ruffians and pimps" to be "in a dangerous state" and to be subjected "to the security measures" of the law (BOE of 17 July 1954). This consideration of homosexuals as dangerous subjects led to an increase in the number of arrests, almost all of them men. • On 28 June 1969, following the police raid on the Stonewall Inn LGBT pub in New York and the revolt of some customers refusing to be arrested, the Pride movement was born (Snodgrass, 2019). From that moment on, Gay Pride Day has been celebrated internationally on that day in commemoration of this event. In Spain, due to the regime, the movement did not begin until later, but this historic milestone had an international influence on the fight for LGBT rights worldwide.

1970-1979. End of the Dictatorship and first years of Democracy in Spain
• 1970-1975-Final stage of Francoism. Díaz (2019 The regulation of homosexuality evolved in the opposite direction to other transgressions: while it is considered that the Francoism of the 1970s began to become more flexible, in this area political control intensified, being one of the most condemned practices that did not enjoy a regulatory relaxation. Furthermore, and although the law does not explicitly allude to it, practice showed that it was not the sexual act itself that was punished, but men who broke gender roles and did not comply with the sacrament of marriage. In 1970 there was the new Social Danger and Sexual Rehabilitation Act, which was more paternalistic in nature: homosexuals were no longer punished, but those who "carry out homosexual practices", and the law was not intended to be punitive but re-educational (Mora-Gaspar, 2019).

2000-2009: Normalization and acceptance at the social and legislative levels
With the arrival of the new millennium, the normalization of gender and sexual diversity in advertising is consolidated. For example, sexuality and nudity began to be shown more explicitly, without the need to use ambiguities as in previous decades. The approval of same-sex marriage coincided with a greater normalization, in advertising terms, of the imagery related to the collective.
As far as gender roles are concerned, the co-responsibility of household chores is fully achieved as far as their representation in advertising is concerned, going beyond the "aesthetic chores on camera" (cooking and taking care of the children, basically): one example, among others, is Bosch ad No. 22, which shows a man doing the ironing. In addition, equality is starting to move more in the direction of femvertising. Nevertheless, ads such as Heineken's (No. 24) continue to depict differences by gender: girls are interested in clothes and boys interested in beer.
These are turbulent times for reflecting family diversity in advertising. In a very clear way, there coexists an advertising that reflects the most traditional society and another "more transgressive" one that represents the social evolution regarding the gay men and lesbian collective. Thus, we find advertisements that, even though they are clearly endeavouring to reflect the variety of couples in love, as they see it, do not show gay and lesbian couples (advertisement No. 23, IKEA). Others directly sexualize relationships between women and objectify them (ad No. 21, Musicón del Verano). In the most extreme case, we find companies such as the communication group Intereconomia (No. 25) that punish the demands of the rights of the collective, using an advertising style that tries to instill "fear" (Figure 1). That is to say, some advertisements are responsible for reflecting the discontent generated in part of the population by the approval of same-sex marriage.
However, the majority do support an inclusive and diverse society. Therefore, in this instance, according to the spots in our sample there is not a complete relationship between advertising's treatment of the gay men and lesbian community and the legislative framework.

2010-2021: Current decade
The period 2010-2021 sees a notable increase in the number of appearances of gay men and lesbian couples and individuals in audiovisual advertising. However, although the growth is considerable compared to previous decades, the percentage with respect to the total number of advertisements (of a commercial nature) is still not very significant.
Based on the content analysis, Table 4 shows the congruence between historical contexts and advertising related to the gay men and lesbian community. LGBT community and part of the population that accepts the normalization of this minority is rejoicing and celebrating at the same time that there are massive demonstrations called by conservative organisations against these social and legislative achievements for the gay and lesbian community. First, it is worth noting the wide variety of products that include depictions of the gay men and lesbian collective. We find everything from dating apps to soft drinks and cleaning products; naturally, this diversity is reflected in the wide range of sectors present in the sample (Figure 2). The sector that includes the most depictions of the gay men and lesbian community is beauty and hygiene (23.7%), followed by food and entertainment (18.42% each).
The research on slogans shows that reference is made to the gay men and lesbian collective depending on the tone of the advertisement. That is to say, if it has an educational or vindicatory function (as in the case of Burger King's ad No. 50 and La Sexta TV channel's ad No. 43), words that aim to empower the collective, such as "pride", are usually included. The use of this type of slogan tends to have a seasonal character, being especially frequent during the LGBTIQ+ Pride celebration (end of June). However, there is another group of ads that simply integrate and normalize gay men and lesbian protagonists within the story told in the ad (for example, No. 28), so the slogan is usually related to the product (Figure 3).
Regarding the relationship between the representations of the gay men and lesbian community in the advertising spots and the fact that both were the target audience of the brands, we observed that gay men and lesbian couples and individuals are reflected in advertising regardless of whether or not they are the target. Specifically, only in 2 of the 38 cases that show situations or environments related to the collective, is sexuality a relevant segmentation criterion (spots Nos. 49 and 53). The rest are products aimed at the general public, of which gay men and lesbians are only a part.
On the other hand, the variable "explicitness of the message", that is, the way in which the reference to the gay men and lesbian community is produced (whether directly or through ambiguities and double meanings) indicates that 71% of the ads in the sample do so explicitly. The words and expressions exchanged by the partners (dialogues showing mutual affection, use of romantic appellatives such as "sweetheart", etc.) as well as the images (the way they look at each other, hug and kiss, for example) are the instrument for this. The remaining 29% of ads show the relationship between the protagonists in an ambiguous way. The main motivation to provoke this ambiguity is probably to favour a more selective perception, i.e. that the viewer is the one who assigns the label of "friends" or "couple" according to his or her reality. This issue leads us to evidence that the relationship between the characters is often ambiguous (No. 27,No. 48 and No. 54).
As for stereotypes, it is worth remembering that the three ways of expression are the storyline way (reproducing clichés about gay men and lesbians, such as promiscuity), the visual way (reproducing clichés about their clothing, appearance, gestures, etc) and the sound way (stereotypes about the way they speak and express themselves). The results show that we have gone from an almost total invisibilization in previous decades, to an inclusion of the collective made from respect,  and with the absence of these clichés. Thus, the ads from this decade reflect a diverse family model. However, there is a discriminatory advertisement (spot No. 61), but it is an isolated and specific case (Figure 4), therefore, the gay men and lesbian community as a sexual and amorous option ends up becoming visible and normalized.
Regarding the types of couples represented, it is worth mentioning that we find a great diversity of ways of showing them: while in some spots only one typology is shown (for example, a gay couple), in others the range is wider and more diversity is shown (for example, gay men and lesbians and heterosexuals being co-protagonists). Specifically, in 47.37% of the ads, gay men and lesbian couples share space with heterosexual couples ( Figure 5).
In the same line, the distribution of percentages of the representation of traditional family models in the decades studied gives a concrete view on the evolution of openness to amorous diversity in the last targeted period (2010)(2011)(2012)(2013)(2014)(2015)(2016)(2017)(2018)(2019)(2020)(2021). The traditional family and couple model is represented in 68% of ads while the diverse family and couple models appear only in 16% of ads in the years from 1960 to 2009. It should be emphasized that 16% of advertisements without a clear model are included. By contrast, the most contemporary era (2010-2021) evokes diverse family and couple models in 100% of cases.  Another noteworthy variable where there are contrasting data between decades is gender roles. First, the roles are well differentiated (totally or sufficiently) in earlier ads while in recent years, advertisers opt for portraying no differences in most of the cases (Table 5).
It can be determined that in the last decade analyzed, advertising is mostly related to social and legal changes in Spain in terms of affectionate relationships. Thus, a respectful inclusion of the gay men and lesbians collective is made, trying to reflect an increasingly common social reality, so that brands can address any type of consumer regardless of their sexual orientation.

Discussion
This research work provides new insights about how advertising and society interplay and feed each other. Although this assertion was already established by Pollay (1986) as well as in more recent works such as those by Schmidt and Stocker (2013) and McDonald et al. (2020), the focus on sexual and amorous diversity evidences how companies continuously seek a balance in their advertising between the reflection of what society is, with its stereotypes and strongest beliefs, and the changes/advances that are inevitably generated within it.  The analysis of advertising content and the historical review leads us to evidence the close relationship of society, legislation and advertising. This struggle in the creative strategy responds to the need to connect with the target audience, being cautious with the possible reticence and rejection of a part of it but being consistent with representation in its imagery of minorities, who interestingly commercially crave to be reflected. In this regard, the findings coincide to some extent with the research works of Akermanidis and Venter (2014) (2017) advertising that includes through images or messages the targeted topics is designed to express awareness and the corporate social responsibility of companies.
The analysis of advertising in Spain over six decades, since the beginning of television in Spain, shows a progressive increase in the representation of the gay and lesbian collective, as do other investigations where a historical review of the presence of this group in advertising is undertaken (Branchik & O'Leary, 2016;Descubes et al., 2018;Iribure Rodrigues & Gallina Zanin, 2014;McDonald et al., 2020;Ragusa, 2005). Nevertheless, the percentage of ads in which the gay men and lesbian imagery is explicitly or implicitly present remains proportionally low over the total volume of television spots analyzed.
The research evidence shows how it is common to use double meanings or the use of messages and/or images that can be interpreted openly to connect with one or another audience, as pointed out by the Social Identity Theory proposed by Taylor and Costello (1985). This common behaviour by the brands analyzed in recent decades coincides with Read et al.  (2020), who emphasize the existence of what they call "mixed sexual ads", i.e., spots in which the representation of gay men and lesbian and heterosexual themes is ambiguous, undertaken to address some without risking the arousal of sensitivities if there is a section of the viewers reluctant to accept the former.
Attention has been drawn to an issue worthy of more detailed reflection in future research. Coinciding with previous research, such as that of Ragusa (2005), there is greater coverage of gay men than of lesbians in the advertising imagery. This is a fact that contrasts with the findings of studies that conclude that the heterosexual population shows greater acceptance/less criticism of images depicting relationships between two people of the same gender if they are women than if they are men (Descubes et al., 2018;Madinga et al., 2020).
Based on the above, the research questions can be answered by showing that there has been a positive change, consistent with the times, in the advertising imagery and its treatment of gay men and lesbians since the 1960s in Spain (RQ1). On the other hand, the representations seem to have a significant relationship with the major milestones and legislation in this field (RQ2), although it can be seen that this evolution is taking place cautiously and coexisting with more classical representations. Finally, love and sexual diversity is more openly expressed, but with a great deal of recourse to interpretable messages or images in order to connect with one or another target according to their identity. Thus, the stance adopted in advertising continues to balance between the disruptive and the classic (RQ3).
The research goes a step further by showing that advertising and the times are moving forward hand in hand, favouring a cautious change that ends up adapting to the most disruptive demands of a part of society. To this end, stigmas, stereotypes or clichés associated with gay men and lesbians are being blurred and inclusive advertising is being projected.
In the most recent years of the analysis, discriminatory messages are hardly detected, curiously in a lower proportion for Spain than in the work of McDonald et al. (2020), focused on American advertising. The research considers the visualization itself in adverts as a step forward that once again emphasizes the social function of advertising. Consequently, the contribution of this work lies not only in its impact on the analysis of advertising imagery, since it also introduces a theoretical contribution that finds its parallel in the term femvertising used by Bahadur (2014): Queervertising. This concept underlines the adaptation of brands to the social, political and economic changes of the LGBTIQ+ community, as well as their contribution to its empowerment, visualization and inclusive recognition in society.

Conclusions
Advertising reflects society, as well as supports new movements or relevant changes that are forged within it. In this sense, the contribution of the concepts of gender and sexual diversity in advertising represents a new prism through which to advance in studies on the social function of advertising, and on being inclusive for historically invisible and stigmatized minority groups. Advertising thus becomes a mainstreaming and empowerment tool for this minority. Sexual and amorous diversity is progressively normalized in advertising creative axes, although the volume of these representations is not so significant in the total number of minutes of television advertising achieved.
Likewise, the effort of companies to include messages that connect with gay men and lesbians in their advertising, but without being excessively explicit or transgressive in order to avoid possible rejection by part of the audience reluctant to accept gay men and lesbian imagery, is underlined. The interaction between society, through the review of key milestones and Spanish legislation for this collective, and advertising seems to show a significant relationship. Based on the above, it can be affirmed that advertising favours changes and social evolution through its commercial messages, both as a means of connecting with the LGBTIQ+ community and to develop its corporate social responsibility and position itself as a gay-friendly communicative tool.

Limitations and future research lines
There is no doubt that in future years, Queervertising will be a fertile area in terms of research. The main limitation of this work is the difficulty in establishing a determinant cause-effect relationship between legislation, movements and social milestones linked to gay men and lesbians and their projection in advertising imagery. However, the proposed methodology has evidenced solid relationships between these dimensions and clarifies the evolution over time of the inclusion of gay men and lesbians in advertising, as well as significant changes in the treatment of this group.
This work has had to focus on gay men and lesbians without it being possible to consider other groups such as transsexuals or bisexuals due to the lack of written or audio text, symbolism or images of them in the advertising under analysis. Therefore, it is presented as a future line of research of interest to complete the vision of the phenomenon studied.
Likewise, it would be useful to make an international comparison incorporating other European countries or even contrasting the results with countries with less legislative progress and recognition of the rights of the LGBTIQ+ community.
Despite the usefulness of content analysis, a final future line of research would be to triangulate the data to include the perception and motivations of three main groups. Firstly, by approaching companies directly through a focus group or in-depth interviews. Likewise, it would be interesting to know how advertising copywriters take on this challenge of inclusive society in advertisements. Finally, by involving gay men and lesbians and heterosexual audiences in the fieldwork with the aim of delving into and comparing their perceptions and feelings regarding ads.

Practical implications
Corporate advertising changes and evolves along with society. The most relevant practical implication would be to make brand owners aware of the suitability of exercising their social function in a more disruptive and less cautious way, becoming agents promoting changes and innovative perspectives in society and positively relating their brands as gayfriendly. Urging advertisers and researchers to work for a fairer and more inclusive society through their messages is a complex and ambitious, but unavoidable and necessary challenge.

Data availability
As detailed, secondary data for analysis were obtained from the Spanish Association of Advertisers (Asociación Española de Anunciantes, AEA); and from complementary databases provided by the El Publicista journal (El Publicista, 2021) and the Sanz Channel (Sanz, 2016).
We have provided the data produced by our content analysis of advertisements, using the analysis sheet in Table 1

Open Peer Review
Yes