Technological tools for the measurement of sensory characteristics in food: A review

The use of technological tools, in the food industry, has allowed a quick and reliable identification and measurement of the sensory characteristics of food matrices is of great importance, since they emulate the functioning of the five senses (smell, taste, sight, touch, and hearing). Therefore, industry and academia have been conducting research focused on developing and using these instruments which is evidenced in various studies that have been reported in the scientific literature. In this review, several of these technological tools are documented, such as the e-nose, e-tongue, colorimeter, artificial vision systems, and instruments that allow texture measurement (texture analyzer, electromyography, others). These allow us to carry out processes of analysis, review, and evaluation of food to determine essential characteristics such as quality, composition, maturity, authenticity, and origin. The determination of these characteristics allows the standardization of food matrices, achieving the improvement of existing foods and encouraging the development of new products that satisfy the sensory experiences of the consumer, driving growth in the food sector. However, the tools discussed have some limitations such as acquisition cost, calibration and maintenance cost, and in some cases, they are designed to work with a specific food matrix.


Introduction
The world of the food industry search to ensure satisfactory multisensory experiences for consumers through the consolidation of quality standards for food products (Blissett & Fogel, 2013;Tuorila & Hartmann, 2020).The first approach to each food matrix allows the consumer to identify attributes related to size, shape, color, and brightness.A second approach allows more direct interactions related to the perception of smell, aroma, taste, temperature, and texture of the product (Fine & Riera, 2019;Isogai & Wise, 2016;Moding et al., 2020;Nederkoorn et al., 2018).Recognizing these sensory characteristics determines the acceptance or rejection of the food (Costell et al., 2009;Torres Gonzalez et al., 2015;Wadhera & Capaldi-Phillips, 2014).One of the disciplines that study the sensory characteristics of food is sensory analysis.This term became a field of study in the 17th century when Jean Anthelme Brillat-Savarin, in 1825, wrote his first book entitled Philosophy of Taste, in which he established the basis for the analysis of food and how it is perceived (Chong, 2012).The constant evolution of the concept and applicability of sensory analysis has consolidated its study using trained panelists or instrumental methods.Although the analyses carried out by these panelists constitute an essential source of information for the acceptance or rejection of a food product, this can be subjective due to biological, social, and other external factors surrounding the subject (Buratti et al., 2018;Loutfi et al., 2015;Tan & Xu, 2020).
One of the main limitations when implementing sensory tests is the number of required panelists, ranging from 7 to 100 depending on the test type (Lawless & Heymann, 2010;O'Mahony, 2017).This implies an investment of human and economic resources, raw materials, and/or time.This limitation has motivated researchers to generate technologies to identify and quantify some sensory characteristics of foods with greater precision (Akimoto et al., 2017;Kusumi et al., 2020;Pascual et al., 2018).
Such developments search to mimic the functioning of the five senses, such is the case of electronic noses (e-noses) and tongues (e-tongues), which upon contact with food, generate an electronic response from a chemical interaction, which is interpreted by a digital information processing system (Banerjee et al., 2019;Bonah et al., 2020).Similarly, image analysis through devices such as cameras seek to simulate the sense of eyesight (Ansari et al., 2021;Barbon et al., 2017;Kakani et al., 2020;Khojastehnazhand & Ramezani, 2020); concerning touch and hearing, some reports show various technological tools that measure force and sound, seeking to imitate the behavior of these senses (Akimoto et al., 2019;Kato et al., 2017;Kusumi et al., 2020).
Each of the technological tools mentioned above contributes a description of the primary sensory characteristics of the food matrix to be evaluated.Few works show the use of more than one technological tool, despite the fact that the combination of these tools allows for better management of different types of resources (scientific personnel, economic resources, time, raw materials).However, Huang et al. (2023), Chen et al. (2023), Gao et al. (2022) and Martínez-Velasco et al. (2022) made use of more than one technological tool.This article consolidates information on some technological tools reported in the literature for sensory analysis in various food matrices.

Electronic nose (e-nose)
Odor is one of the most representative attributes of food.This can be expressed as one of the qualities of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs), so unique and distinctive that they are considered fingerprints (Bonah et al., 2020;Tan & Xu, 2020).
Generally, the sensory analysis method to identify such components is performed by panelists who rate and classify on different scales the odor perceived in the sample (Barbieri et al., 2021;Giungato et al., 2018;Niu et al., 2019;Swiąder & Marczewska, 2021).On the other hand, different methods have been developed for the identification of VOCs, such as: 1) Gas Chromatography-Olfactometry (GC-O): this methodology is to assess the odor impact of volatile compounds present in a sample extract and assign a degree of significance to each individual compound.GC-olfactometry, or GC-O, encompasses a range of techniques that rely on human assessors to detect and assess the volatile compounds released during a gas chromatography separation (Delahunty et al., 2006).2) Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (GC-MS): is an analytical technique that integrates the capabilities of both gas chromatography and mass spectrometry to detect and identify various substances present in a given test sample.This technique is utilized within flavor research to identify the aroma-contributing compounds in various food products.These methodologies encompass approaches such as dilution analysis, detection frequency techniques, posterior intensity assessments, and time-intensity evaluations (Van Ruth, 2001).3) Headspace Solid Phase Microextraction (HS-SPME), is a modern and highly sensitive sample preparation technique that does not require solvents.HS-SPME has emerged as a potent sample preparation method that efficiently enables the isolation and concentration of analytes from intricate matrices.It utilizes a coated fiber to concentrate volatile and semi-volatile compounds from a sample, operating on the principles of adsorption/absorption and subsequent desorption (Lancioni et al., 2022).
These methods (GC-O, GC-MS, HS-SPME) are characterized by high accuracy and reliability, as some of the most used methods (Attchelouwa et al., 2020;Chen et al., 2021).However, these methods usually require sample conditioning, which involves investing many different types of resources (Shi et al., 2018).Considering the above, devices such as the e-nose have been developed, consisting of an array of electrochemical sensors articulated with a pattern recognition system that identifies, groups, and discriminates the VOCs (Gliszczy nska-Swigło & Chmielewski, 2017;Loutfi et al., 2015).This has become an alternative to generating fast and reliable results in the food industry (Barbosa-Pereira et al., 2019;Conti et al., 2021;Wasilewski et al., 2019).

The internal structure of the e-nose
The e-nose is a device that seeks, like humans, to perceive, identify and classify odors.The process carried out by an e-nose compared to the human nose can be described as follows: the odor molecules are exposed to the e-nose (which corresponds to the human nose), the chemical patterns present in the sample of the aroma are detected by sensors (which are equivalent to the olfactory receptor neurons), which transform this chemical input into an electrical signal, producing, for each aroma, a unique response pattern, designated as an olfactory fingerprint (function performed by the olfactory bulb).Finally, pattern recognition techniques are applied to this response to discriminate, classify and/or predict the type of aroma being analyzed (action developed in the brain thanks to neurons) (Moreno et al., 2009).Thus, the e-nose is characterized by the articulation of three fundamental systems: sensing, electrical conditioning, and pattern recognition; see Figure 1.
The sensing system is composed of a matrix of sensors that can be of different types such as: conductivity, polymers, Conductive Polymers (CP), Metal Oxide Semiconductors (MOS), Surface Acoustic Waves (SAW), and Quartz Crystal Microbalance (QCM), which allow the detection of VOCs through absorption, adsorption, or chemical reaction methods.Depending on the characteristics of the food matrix to be evaluated, the sensors that make up the e-nose must be carefully considered, as they will react more efficiently to certain particles (Tan & Xu, 2020;Wilson & Baietto, 2009).This detection produces an electronic signal, from which it is possible to characterize the VOCs.The electrical conditioning system is responsible for matching the signal emitted by each of the sensors.Signal matching consists of amplification and filtering to identify the analyzed food matrix sample (Shi et al., 2018).
Finally, the pattern recognition system receives the already conditioned electrical signal and is in charge of processing it.For this procedure, extraction methods are used, which aim to obtain reliable and robust information from the electrical signal, guaranteeing greater measurement efficiency.Some extraction methods are: Principal Component Analysis (PCA), Support Vector Machines (SVM), Artificial Neural Networks (ANN), Linear Discrimination Analysis (LDA), Discriminant Function Analysis (DFA), decision trees, and other machine learning classifiers (Tan & Xu, 2020;Yan et al., 2015).

E-nose applications
E-nose is used in several food matrices to identify their authenticity due to the growing number of counterfeit products that represent a significant risk to the health of consumers (Gliszczy nska-Swigło & Chmielewski, 2017).Additionally, this device also allows users to identify and group according to their specifications some food matrices such as: alcoholic    beverages, dairy products, and juices (Sanaeifar et al., 2017); the ripeness of fruits and vegetables; quality of meats; shelf life of grains, among others (Du et al., 2019;Tan & Xu, 2020;Wang et al., 2019).
For example, the e-nose of the Alpha MOS FOX family has been used to identify possible adulteration of olive oil with hazelnut and sunflower oils (Mildner-Szkudlarz & Jele n, 2008).Also, in the analysis of flaxseed oil detecting adulteration with other similar components (Wei et al., 2015).
In research conducted by Nurjuliana (2011), the volatile compounds in pork, beef, lamb, and chicken sausages were analyzed.The samples taken from each of the sausages were analyzed by mass spectrometry, gas chromatography, and zNose™ electronic nose, which allowed the identification of the type of meat from which the sausages were made.
Although the results of the tests carried out by all the instruments were highly efficient, the speed and low cost of using the zNose™ e-nose were highlighted.
Additionally, in the research by Ghasemi-Varnamkhasti et al. (2019), an e-nose was custom designed using five types of MOS sensors to classify two pieces of cheese: Roquefort and Camembert.This classification was carried out by taking into account the milk (sheep, goat, or cow) with which it was made, the degree of pasteurization, and the maturity of these cheeses.
Other reports show the use of e-noses to analyze fish.Güney and Atasoy (2015), used a low-cost e-nose developed at Karadeniz University, composed of 8 metal oxide gas sensors, to classify three fish species (Horse mackerel (Trachurus murphyi), Anchovy (Engraulidae) and Whiting (Merlangius merlangus).In addition, Zhang et al. (2012a), analyzed VOCs during the storage and freezing process of sawfish (Scomberomorus niphonius), finding a linear relationship between a volatile nitrogen base with triethylamine.A separate investigation reports the use of the commercial e-nose Alpha MOS FOX 3000, composed of 18 MOS-type sensors, to establish the sensory profile of the active aromatic compounds of cumin (Cuminum cyminum L.) (Ravi et al., 2013).
Table 1 shows some relevant studies using e-nose in the food, specifying: product, purpose of the analysis, e-nose model, type of sensor, extraction method, and main result obtained.

Electronic tongue (e-tongue)
The human tongue can identify five basic tastes: sour, salty, sweet, bitter, and umami (Beauchamp, 2019).Usually, the evaluation and classification of the basic flavors of a product are done through trained panelists and sometimes consumers (Jiang et al., 2018).However, these measurements can be subjective, which can be reduced by using technological tools such as the e-tongue, thus ensuring repeatability and reproducibility of the results (Schlossareck & Ross, 2019).Ross (2021) showed that combining different electrodes makes it possible to identify different flavors, such as fatty, metallic, and others.Different investigations have shown that by using the e-tongue, it is possible to determine the quality, adulteration, classification, or origin of food (de Morais et al., 2019;Elamine et al., 2019;Jiang et al., 2018;Sobrino-Gregorio et al., 2018).The previously mentioned characteristics have allowed the e-tongue to become a fast, economical and impartial detection alternative (Titova & Nachev, 2018); this is because it allows the characterization of the flavor of the food matrix (di Rosa et al., 2017).Additionally, the e-tongue has a matrix of electrodes that, according to their combination and characteristics, produce potentiometric, voltametric, and impedimetric signals (Jiang et al., 2018).

The internal structure of the e-tongue
The process carried out by an e-tongue compared to the human tongue can be described as follows: the liquid or food comes into contact with the sensor system (which corresponds to the taste cells spread on the tongue), the chemical patterns present in the sample are detected by the sensors (which is equivalent to the stimulation of taste cells), which transform this chemical input into an electrical signal, producing to which a pattern analysis algorithm is applied to discriminate, classify and/or predict the type of flavor being analyzed (action developed by the neurons in the brain where the flavor is recognized) (Tan & Xu, 2020;Arrieta et al., 2010).Thus, e-tongue is characterized by articulating three fundamental systems: sensing, electrical conditioning, and pattern recognition (di Rosa et al., 2017) (see Figure 2).E-tongue sensing system is composed of two or more electrodes, each electrode has a membrane that upon contact with the analyte generates a chemical interaction causing a reversible change in the electronic properties, which allows the characterization of the food matrix (Tan & Xu, 2020).
Potentiometric-type electrodes measure the voltage differences between the working and the reference electrodes (Wasilewski et al., 2019).The voltage change in the measurement given by the working electrode will have a proportional relationship to the concentration of the analyte (Jiang et al., 2018;W. Wang & Liu, 2019).Some of the membranes used in potentiometric electrodes can be multi-channel lipid with a reference electrode made of a silver/silver carbon alloy (Ag/AgC), chalcogenide glass with a polyvinyl chloride (PVC) film, liquid or polymeric, which allow the detection of the voltage generated when in contact with the food matrix (Tan & Xu, 2020).
Regarding voltametric electrodes, these are used in conjunction with a minimum electrode configuration in which one must have a working, a reference, and an auxiliary electrode (Jiang et al., 2018;Wasilewski et al., 2019).Generally, these working electrodes are constituted by a bare or modified metal, which contemplates any of the following compounds: copper (Cu), nickel (Ni), palladium (Pd), silver (Ag), tin (Sn), titanium (Ti), zirconium (Zr), gold (Au), platinum (Pt) and radium (Ra) (Jiang et al., 2018).Its operation encourages the transfer of electrons through the food matrix, measuring the resulting polarization current, which has a direct relationship with the concentration of certain components present in the food (Wei et al., 2018).
Another group of electrodes is those of impedimetric type, characterized by being coated with different polymeric materials, which, upon receiving an alternating signal of variable frequency and constant amplitude, produce an alteration in the impedance value (Garcia-Hernandez et al., 2018).This impedance change allows for characterizing, detecting, and discriminating different components such as: sucrose (C 12 H 22 O 11 ), sodium chloride (NaCl), potassium chloride (KCl), and hydrochloric acid (HCl) (Podrazka et al., 2017).According to the literature, the most used electrodes on the market are potentiometric and voltametric electrodes due to advanced development (Wang & Liu, 2019).
Tan and Xu (2020) indicated that electrodes in the development phase incorporate biomaterials such as enzymes, whole cells, tissues, receptors, or antibodies, whose chemical interaction with the food generates a transfer of electrons, ions, or molecules.This transfer modifies the characteristics of the electronic signal, like those produced by potentiometric and voltametric electrodes.It is expected that these biosensors will be a technology that will contribute to improving results in the future.
The electrical conditioning and pattern recognition systems of the e-tongue present particularities closely like those of the e-nose.The only substantial difference between these two technological tools is presented in the sensing system in terms of the characteristics specific to the internal and structural design of the sensors (Tan & Xu, 2020;Wasilewski et al., 2019).

E-tongue applications
The use of the e-tongue in the food industry encompasses a wide range of applications, including discrimination by type and place of origin, verification of authenticity, adulteration or counterfeiting, and quantification of food matrix components (Titova & Nachev, 2018;Wasilewski et al., 2019).
A  44 samples of six different varieties of vinegar.The measurement results of the equipment were subjected to the PCA and LDA extraction methods, which allowed the discriminating and categorizing of the total of the analyzed samples with 100% accuracy.This research allowed it to generate records of the electrochemical fingerprints of the vinegar.
Furthermore, a voltametric-type e-tongue was custom-developed to identify adulteration in roasted ground coffee (de Morais et al., 2019).This research analyzed 90 cups of coffee (60 unadulterated and 30 adulterated).LDA, SPA, and PLS-DA identification methods were applied to the measurements obtained; as a result, the adulterated beverages were identified and the purity percentage in each sample was quantified.
Another example is the investigation of the evolution process of taste compounds in the chicken stew at different cooking times, which focused on detecting nucleotides and free amino acids using a commercial e-tongue (TS-5000Z, Insent).As a result, the proportion of the components detected in each cooking stage and the identification of inosine monophosphate (IMP), glutamic acid (Glu), lysine (Lys), and sodium chloride (NaCl) as the main compounds highlighted the final flavor attributes of the chicken were evidenced (Liu et al., 2017).Table 2 shows some relevant studies in which e-tongues in different food matrices.

Colorimeter and Artificial Vision System 4.1 Colorimeter
A colorimeter is a sensor device used to measure color in different surfaces and liquids (Anzalone et al., 2013).According to Millikan (1993), a colorimeter can detect different shades of colors by analyzing the reflection of light in different objects.The principle by which the colorimeter works is the emission of light over the material that must be analyzed and the corresponding reading of the reflection of color.The device then emits a code, representing the exact shade measured.Anzalone ( 2013), mentions that colorimeters are widely used in food industry, medical procedures, and demographic measurement of protozoa.
An essential aspect of working with digital images revolves around information processing.This is because cameras capture RGB (Red, Green, and Blue) values that must be converted into the CIELAB color space.
Table 3 shows some relevant studies using colorimeter in the food, specifying: product, device, and results.

Artificial Vision System
Computer Vision System (CVS) also known as Artificial Vision System (AVS), is an image analysis tool used to obtain information about objects through them (Bhargava & Bansal, 2018;Wu & Sun, 2013).This is due to its ability to characterize: shape, size, color, and other particularities of the object, which can be static or moving (Zhu et al., 2021).Therefore, the CVS can be used in both continuous and static production lines, achieving a real-time analysis, as it allows fast, accurate, and non-invasive captures, with reliable and reproducible results (Barbon et al., 2017;Patrício & Rieder, 2018).Due to its flexibility and technological development, a CVS can store information about an object to perform further analysis using new images (Taheri-Garavand et al., 2019;Wu & Sun, 2013).Thus, the CVS becomes an alternative to avoid the possible errors of quality inspection of the objects which the human eye can incur (Patrício & Rieder, 2018).

CVS internal structure
A CVS is composed of three fundamental stages: illumination, image detection, and pattern recognition (Kakani et al., 2020), see Figure 3.The first stage plays an important role in image acquisition, since light has a direct impact on the clarity and color of the images and its improper use can generate shadows and unwanted reflections, cataloged as noise in the images (Vithu & Moses, 2016).Therefore, depending on the application of the system, an appropriate selection of the light-generating elements must be made, considering characteristics such as wavelength, intensity, and direction.These light-generating elements can be light bulbs (incandescent, fluorescent, halogen), lasers, light emitting diodes (LEDs), X-ray tubes, and infrared lamps (Naik & Patel, 2017;Sun et al., 2019;Zhu et al., 2021).These ensure clarity, repeatability, and reliability of the image (Barbon et al., 2017).This process is like that carried out by the human visual system, where light stimuli reach the cornea (the curved front layer of the eye that assists in focusing), which then focuses the light onto the pupil to enter the eye.However, the iris controls the amount of light that enters the pupil (Frisby & Stone, 2010).
Two of the most used technologies in the second stage are cameras or scanners, which are responsible for taking an image of the object to be analyzed.Cameras capture a two-dimensional image instantaneously, while scanners take a line of  pixels in an instant of time, so it requires a mechanism that performs a displacement of the scanner or the object to capture a succession of data and thus obtain the two-dimensional image (Patrício & Rieder, 2018).Internally, these devices have specialized sensors that can capture color, monochromatic, thermal, or ultraviolet images depending on their characteristics (Patrício & Rieder, 2018;Sun, 2016;Vithu & Moses, 2016;Zhang et al., 2014).Other technologies used in this stage are: Hyperspectral, Magnetic Resonance, and X-Ray (Sun, 2016;Zhang et al., 2014).Drawing an analogy with the behavior of the sense of sight, this stage corresponds to when the lens collects the incoming light beam in the eye.The lens allows for focusing on objects and, along with the cornea, correctly focuses the light on the retina.This beam of light travels through the vitreous cavity (a hollow space filled with a transparent gel-like fluid that serves as the medium through which light travels from the lens to the retina).In the retina (which functions as a projection screen), thanks to the presence of photoreceptors (rods, responsible for peripheral and nighttime vision, and cones, sensitive to the color of light), the light information is converted into a nerve impulse that is sent to the cerebral cortex through the optic nerve (Frisby & Stone, 2010).

Lighting Computer vision system (CVS)
Finally, the third stage aims to extract quantitative and qualitative information from the image using an analysis algorithm usually run on a processor (Zhu et al., 2021).Depending on the application and the complexity of the system, image processing is divided into three different levels: low, medium, and high.At the first level, operations such as cleaning of noise caused by shadows or external elements, quality enhancement, or correction of image illumination errors are performed (Patrício & Rieder, 2018).Then, at the medium level, segmentation, description, classification of shapes, and image dimensions are performed (Sun et al., 2019;Taheri-Garavand et al., 2019).Finally, at the third level, more complex operations are performed, including classification, comparison, and discrimination of the characteristics of the object in the image.These operations can be applied to the area or regions of interest using analysis methods such as statistical tools or computational models such as neural networks, which are some of the most used extraction methods (Kakani et al., 2020;Patrício & Rieder, 2018).When relating this phase to the sense of sight, the nerve signal that reaches the cerebral cortex is interpreted through a psychochemical process and transformed into an image (Frisby & Stone, 2010).
Given the versatility and advantages presented by a CVS, the food industry has been implementing these systems to identify properties such as: morphology, color, texture, freshness, and quality (Bhargava & Bansal, 2018;Patrício & Rieder, 2018;Taheri-Garavand et al., 2019;Vithu & Moses, 2016).In general, the information collected is fed into databases to train learning algorithms and establish patterns to build a knowledge base, with which a system for autonomous decision-making can be implemented to provide an agile and flexible solution (Zareiforoush et al., 2015).

CVS applications
The applications that recurrently use CVS are focused on the classification and prediction of the characteristics of a food matrix, whether it is an individual analysis, a production batch, or harvesting (Arsalane et al., 2020;Kakani et al., 2020;Velesaca et al., 2021).Research such as the one carried out by Arselane et al. (2020) in which they were able to successfully evaluate and determine the freshness of beef based on color and texture obtained by a portable customdesigned CVS.The system comprises fluorescent lighting, a GigEPRO camera, and an EVM6678 processing system in which PCA, SVN, PNN, and LDA algorithms were evaluated using Matlab ® .In a similar investigation carried out by Barbin (2016) to find the relationship between color and quality of chicken meat, a CVS was used with a Doc L-Pix camera.
Researchers such as Ghyar and Birajdar (2017), implemented a CVS, with which the state of pests in the rice plants was identified, to determine and discriminate anomalies or disease traits using leaf texture and color as reference parameters.
The system developed consists of a Sony F470 camera, LED illumination, and computer analysis where ANN and SVM algorithms were run.Similarly, Koklu and Ozkan (2020) carried out the classification of seven different bean varieties to ensure the uniformity and quality of the seeds, identifying the characteristics of each bean species such as: area, perimeter, length of major and minor axes, aspect ratio, roundness, equivalent diameter, among others.The CVS was equipped with a Prosilica GT2000C camera, LED lighting, and a processor where an ANN algorithm was implemented in Matlab ® .
The research performed by Shrestha et al. (2016) reported a morphological analysis of wheat kernels to segment and classify them into three groups: healthy, damaged, and very damaged, as a consequence of premature germination.The result obtained was the segmentation and classification of the three groups of grains with an accuracy of 95% and 72.8%, respectively.The custom-designed system has two RL04C-OC cameras (Ximea GmbH, Germany), LED lighting system, and ANN implemented in Matlab ® .
Other applications of CVS systems are in fruits and vegetables, such as the one carried out by Santos Pereira (2018), where he classified the ripeness level of harvested papayas through the identification of color, length, diameter, and The results obtained with the CVS was a prediction accuracy of 92.5% for pork color and 75.0% for pork marbling score (Sun et al., 2018) weight with an accuracy of 94.3% compared to manual classification.The CVS developed in-house, incorporates a Sony camera (Japan) located in an environment illuminated with white LED light.The pictures of each fruit were analyzed in Matlab ® using a decision tree algorithm.Table 4 shows some relevant investigation where CVS has been used.

Texture analyzer
The texture of a food is perceived through the response to the contact between the body part and the food.It is a determining characteristic in the acceptance of the product by the consumer (Civille, 2011;Liu et al., 2019;Muthukumarappan & Karunanithy, 2021).Texture is a quality attribute used in the food industry (Torres Gonzalez et al., 2015), allowing the parameterization and standardization of food products (Liu et al., 2019).For example, freshness, a determining characteristic in selecting a vegetable or fruit, can be described by its hardness (Liu & Zhang, 2021).The latter is one of the primary properties of texture, as well as cohesiveness, viscosity, elasticity, and adhesiveness (Foegeding et al., 2011).
To determine some of the main textural characteristics mentioned, Friedman in 1963 established a method called Texture Profile Testing (TPA) (Nishinari et al., 2019).This method generates characteristic curves from the force measurement performed by the jaw to realize a change in the geometrical property of the product, generating deformation or fracture (Kohyama, 2020;Peleg, 2019).The study of these curves allows for establishing and quantifying texture characteristics such as: brittleness, hardness, adhesiveness, cohesiveness, elasticity, gumminess, and chewiness (Nishinari et al., 2019).
For the measurement of texture characteristics, different methodologies and instruments have been developed, the most widely used technology is centered on texture analyzers or texturometers (Torres Gonzalez et al., 2015), which are based on the TPA principle, this device simulates the bite of the jaw in two cycles (compression and decompression), through a controlled mechanism that vertically displaces a uniaxial compression cell (Peleg, 2019).When the cell comes into contact with the product, it generates an electrical signal conditioned by a transducer and sent to a computer to be read by operating software (Taniwaki & Kohyama, 2012).The displacement is carried out until it reaches either a distance threshold or a force level defined by the operator.When this limit is exceeded, the cell moves back and repeats the cycle (Liu et al., 2019), simulating the chewing process.Chewing is the first step in the digestion process, and this seeks to prepare food for swallowing.During this process, saliva moistens the chewed food, generating a bolus, which is reduced in size so it can be swallowed.Additionally, saliva helps release flavors and perceive the texture of the food.To achieve this, the intervention of teeth, tongue, saliva, cheeks, and palate is required (Pereira et al., 2007).

Texture Analyzer Internal Structure
The texture analyzer usually has three fundamental parts: a moving beam, a load cell, and a control panel (Schmidt, 2018).
The first part has a mechanical system that performs the precise vertical displacement of the beam where the load cell is supported; these mechanisms work with a spindle-type system, which has a motor coupled to it that transmits the controlled circular motion (Sussex, 2013).The load cells are electrical elements that generate a voltage signal when they come into contact with a surface (Liu et al., 2019).The cells used are in a range of operation from 100 g to 500 kg (Schmidt, 2018;Sussex, 2013), which will depend on the design of each manufacturer's analyzer.
With the basic structure of the texture analyzer already mentioned, a variety of probes can be incorporated, which, coupled with the load cell, make it possible to measure a large part of the common texture parameters in foodstuffs (Liu et al., 2019).Among which are the cylindrical probe, which was used to determine the firming kinetics of breadcrumbs (Jekle et al., 2018).The conical probe that allowed me to measure the texture for deep-fried and air-fried French fries (Gouyo et al., 2020), The Spherical probe with which they analyzed the texture of the surface of cured ham (Fulladosa et al., 2021).Also, there are gel and cut probe, each with properties to perform certain texture tests.

Texture analyzer applications
Some applications in which the texture analyzer is used are evidenced in investigations such as the one conducted by Aguirre et al. (2018), where texture attributes were validated in the "woody breast" and "cooking methods on the marination" (marinated breast), for which a texture analyzer (TA.XT plus, Texture Technologies, Hamilton, MA) was used.The results were compared with a descriptive test, finding a significant difference in 9 of the 11 texture attributes.
Another application is shown in the research conducted by Jiménez et al. (2017), where two lionfish surimi patties were studied to validate the efficiency of high-power ultrasound on textural properties.The measurement was performed with a texture analyzer (TA.XT plus, Texture Technologies, Hamilton, MA) correlated with trained panelists.
Other relevant studies, such as those mentioned above, where the aim is to characterize products and correlate them with sensory tests using a texture analyzer, are shown in Table 5.

Electromyographic analysis
Although TPA is a method that simulates the chewing process, its shear rate is low compared to that of the human bite (Nishinari & Fang, 2018).Therefore, some researchers have focused on finding other mechanisms that allow an understanding of the bite processes of people in a real environment.One of the alternatives is the study of Electromyographic (EMG) signals, which are produced by the nervous system so that the muscles involved during the chewing process react in a certain way producing electrical signals that can be measured (Besomi et al., 2020;Pereira de Caxias et al., 2021).These signals are captured with an electromyograph, which integrates an instrumentation amplifier that captures and amplifies the EMG signal with the help of three reference electrodes (Fang et al., 2020), measuring the activity of the jaw muscles and the coordination between them, as well as the movement of the jaw.This signal is sent through a data acquisition board (DAQ), to a processing system where it is processed and sent to a data acquisition system (DAS) (Gohel & Mehendale, 2020) to a processing system where it is subjected to extraction methods that perform the analysis of the signal (Ahsan et al., 2009;Zabala et al., 2019).Sodhi et al. (2019) correlated bite EMG signals with texture variables (instrumental and sensory) of seven Indian sweets, identifying EMG parameters that distinguish the different textured foods.In addition, the PCA determined the significant correlation between hardness (instrumental and sensory) and sensory stickiness.Similarly, Shimada et al. (2012) established intraoral force recordings to analyze the mechanics of human chewing by measuring the force (using strain gauges located on the molars) and the EMG signals (using electrodes located on the masseter muscle) during the biting process of five different products (rice, bread, almonds, banana, and apple).Other relevant studies where the effectiveness of the analysis of EMG signals to determine the texture of a food matrix is sought to be validated are shown in Table 6.

Acoustic analysis
Food products have the characteristic that when consumed they generate sounds that allow identifying or relating some textural properties such as hardness, crispness, and crunchiness to it (Dias-Faceto et al., 2020).These sensory properties are related to the freshness of the food.When food is ingested, sound waves are generated that can be perceived through the ears by air conduction or through the jaw by bone conduction.Crispy foods, having a more fragile structure, generate high-frequency sounds; while crunchy foods produce low frequency sounds (Tunick et al., 2013).Some of the equipment to perform these measurements use devices such as microphones connected to computers o texture analyzers integrated with microphones (Dias-Faceto & Conti-Silva, 2022), and alternative designs with oscillating tips and piezoelectric sensors (Taniwaki et al., 2006).All these devices allow capturing the acoustic waves produced by the deformation of the product.These sound waves are captured by microphones which are made up of a diaphragm, a grille, and a transducer.The transducer is responsible for converting the movement generated in the membrane (by detecting a sound wave) into electrical signals.Additionally, it has electronic circuits that help manipulate and improve the electrical signal, among these elements are Light Emitting Diodes (LEDs) whose function is to indicate an on/off state, buttons to manipulate the volume amplitude, filters, among others.This electrical signal is sent to a computer where software analyzes and graphs it (Dias-Faceto et al., 2020).In humans, sound wave reaches the outer ear, where the sound is collected and transmitted to the middle ear through the ear canal.Between the outer ear and the middle ear is the tympanic membrane or eardrum, which vibrates when it detects sound (behavior imitated by the microphone diaphragm).The middle ear, made up of the tympanic cavity, houses the auditory ossicles (malleus, incus, and stapes), which transform high-amplitude, low-intensity sound waves into low-amplitude, high-intensity vibrations (behavior similar to that of amplifiers).In this way, the ossicles are the intermediaries in the transmission of vibrations from the eardrum to the inner ear.The inner ear detects and transmits auditory impulses to the brain (function carried out by the software housed in the computer) through the vestibulocochlear nerve (function carried out by a transmission medium such as cables) (Duizer, 2001).It is known that soft tissues have a damping effect (a function performed by attenuating circuits) on the sound produced when chewing food.To match what is heard during the consumption of a product, bone-borne noise must be attenuated at a frequency of 160 Hz, while air-borne sound must be attenuated at 160 Hz and amplified at 3.5 kHz (Dacremont Colas & Sauvageot, 1991).Due to these differences in sound contribution, the two sounds must be combined and equalized to fully quantify the acoustic sensations perceived during the consumption of crunchy or crispy products (Vickers & Bourne, 1976).
Researchers such as Bło nska et al. (2014), showed that adding inulin with reduced fat content significantly affected the acoustic parameters of Short-Dough Biscuits.Eight Short-Dough Biscuits with different percentages of inulin addition were compared, determining the impact on the acoustic properties and the decrease in the breaking workforce.For example, the biscuit with 74.1% fat and 18.5% inulin, showed a low acoustic energy level of 1.134 a. u. this compared to a biscuit with 55.6% fat and 9.3% inulin, in which a high acoustic energy level of 17.373 a. u. was found, the former being less brittle and hard compared to the latter.This was achieved using a Zwick 1445 measuring system (Zwick GmbH & Co. KG, Ulm, Germany).Separately, Jakubczyk et al. (2017) studied the acoustic signals generated during puncture tests on some coextruded cereal products with different fillings (toffee, milk, fruit jelly, coconut, and chocolate creams), to perform the analysis of hardness, crunchiness, and texture sound attributes for each product.The results showed that the snacks with jelly filling were perceived as less crunchy and soft, compared to the snack with milk cream filling, which showed high acoustic and mechanical values that link it to crunchiness.The variables were measured with a BC45 cooking extruder (Clextral, Firminy, France).Other relevant investigation, such as those mentioned above, where acoustic analysis was performed to determine some textural properties of certain foods, can be seen in Table 7.

Other considerations
Other considerations to take into account when acquiring a technological tool for the study of food matrices are: • Costs: The acquisition of technological tools, such as those presented in this article, can be expensive.For example, the cost of e-nose ranges from USD 100 to USD 1000; the texturometer at an approximate value of USD 23900; a colorimeter at an approximate value of USD 12000 and an electromyograph (for medical use) at an approximate value of USD 10560.Regarding accessories and/or additional components, these can vary between USD 10 and USD 2300.This aspect must be considered when purchasing any of these technological tools to keep them operational.
• Maintenance and calibration: After a period of use, these technological tools, like any equipment, will require periodic maintenance and regular calibration to ensure their accuracy and reliability.These costs can range from 3% to 20% of the initial value of the equipment per year.
Finally, it must be considered that the study of various food matrices is characterized by the variability of the samples, this being biological material.Thus, some e-tongues and e-noses are designed to identify specific compounds with high precision, thus limiting the analysis of food matrices for which they were not designed.Regarding the use of the colorimeter, lighting conditions and texture of the food matrix can affect the results.All of the above shows the economic and technical limitations that these technological tools may have.

General conclusions
As evidenced in this review, some technological tools have been developed to emulate the functioning of the five senses (smell, taste, sight, touch, and hearing), seeking to quantify and characterize some sensory properties of different food matrices, to compare, parameterize and standardize a product.These investigations show that the use of technological tools guarantees the repeatability and reproducibility of the process, compared to the results obtained when working with trained panelists.Therefore, the use of this type of device reduces the number of samples required to perform the analysis, in addition to dispensing with the need for a team of trained panelists, which generates a reduction in costs.
In addition, another advantage of these tools is the wider measurement capacity compared to that of human beings.However, most of the tools analyzed only have the property of measuring a single characteristic in a food matrix, this becomes an inconvenience when it comes to characterizing an entire product, for which many tools must be available, samples required and therefore an increase in the time of the analysis and availability of personnel to carry out the process.This is why both the scientific community and the industry, increasing the development of research that seeks to create new technological tools that allow the measurement of two or more sensory characteristics in a food matrix.All the above, seeking to develop new food products and improve existing ones to satisfy the sensory experiences of the consumer, driving growth in the food sector.

Mustapha Muhammad Nasiru
Department of Food Science and Technology, Federal University Dutsin-Ma, Dutsin-Ma, Katsina, Nigeria This review explores various technological tools, including e-nose, e-tongue, artificial vision systems, and texture analysis instruments used to analyse and assess food properties like quality, composition, maturity, authenticity, and origin.By standardising these characteristics, they enhance existing food products and create new ones that cater to consumers' sensory preferences.This advancement supports growth in the food sector by delivering satisfying sensory experiences to consumers.
The paper exhibits a well-organised structure, with coherent headings and subheadings that contribute to the overall clarity of the manuscript.The write-up is satisfactory and presented in good English.The figures and tables provided are clear and comprehensible, aiding in understanding the findings.
However, there are some suggestions as follows: The abstract should be rewritten to include the findings of the study.

○
Colour measurement devices were not discussed sufficiently, so more discussion is needed.The manuscript described several technologies applied in the field of food sensory.The flow of the manuscript is good and well-structured.The information provided is useful.However, some of these technologies are extensively reviewed like e-nose and e-tongue.
The following would improve the manuscript: GC and GC/O were mentioned in the introduction but were not discussed.1.
Highlighting the advances in these technologies.2.
The colorimeter was not discussed.

3.
Discuss the correlation between human sensory evaluation and these technologies.Reviewer Expertise: Food sensory, food analysis, gas chromatography, E-nose I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard, however I have significant reservations, as outlined above.
The paper provides a comprehensive overview of various technological tools used in sensory analysis in the food industry.It covers a wide range of devices and techniques, including e-nose, etongue, artificial vision systems, texture analyzers, electromyographic analysis, and acoustic analysis.This comprehensive coverage is valuable for readers interested in understanding the diversity of tools available for sensory analysis.This manuscript is well-structured, with each section dedicated to a specific technological tool.This organization makes it easy for readers to navigate and find information on each tool separately.Additionally, the internal structure and applications of each tool are described in detail, providing a clear understanding of their operation and potential uses.
The authors emphasize the practical applications of these technological tools in the food industry.It highlights how these tools can be used to assess various sensory characteristics such as flavor, texture, and appearance.The practical examples and applications mentioned in the paper demonstrate the real-world utility of these tools for quality control and product development.
However, the authors should provide a wealth of information on the various tools, it lacks critical evaluation and discussion of their limitations and challenges.A review should not only highlight the strengths but also address potential weaknesses and constraints associated with the use of these tools.For instance, the paper does not discuss the cost, maintenance requirements, and calibration challenges that may arise when implementing these tools in food production settings.The manuscript does not discuss recent advancements and developments in the field of sensory analysis technology.Given the rapid pace of technological innovation, it would be beneficial to include information on any emerging tools or techniques that have been developed since the paper's publication.
Finally, the authors briefly mention some data analysis methods used in conjunction with these tools, such as Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and machine learning classifiers.However, it would be helpful to provide more in-depth discussions on data analysis techniques and how they are applied to interpret the results obtained from these tools.
Answer.We appreciate the suggestion made; however, this review is focused on presenting some of the technological tools used for the analysis of sensory characteristics in food matrices.Therefore, data analysis methods used in conjunction with these tools, such as Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and machine learning classifiers, were not discussed in this review.However, we are working with a master's student on a review article which includes the compilation of research studies related to existing data analysis methods that have been used in the study of food matrices.
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
The benefits of publishing with F1000Research: Your article is published within days, with no editorial bias • You can publish traditional articles, null/negative results, case reports, data notes and more • The peer review process is transparent and collaborative • Your article is indexed in PubMed after passing peer review • Dedicated customer support at every stage • For pre-submission enquiries, contact research@f1000.com

Figure 1 .
Figure 1.Fundamental stages of operation of an electronic nose.

Figure 2 .
Figure 2. Fundamental stages of operation of an electronic tongue.

Figure 3 .
Figure 3. Fundamental stages of operation of a machine vision system.

○
Is the topic of the review discussed comprehensively in the context of the current literature?Yes Are all factual statements correct and adequately supported by citations?Yes Is the review written in accessible language?Yes Are the conclusions drawn appropriate in the context of the current research literature?© 2023 Al-Attabi Z.This is an open access peer review report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.Zahir Al-Attabi Department of Food Science and Nutrition, College of Agricultural and Marine Sciences, Sultan Qaboos University, Al-Khodh, Muscat Governorate, Oman are amended in the manuscript PDF file linked.Is the topic of the review discussed comprehensively in the context of the current literature?Partly Are all factual statements correct and adequately supported by citations?Yes Is the review written in accessible language?Yes Are the conclusions drawn appropriate in the context of the current research literature?Partly Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.

Table 1 .
. Results of relevant studies using electronic noses in the food industry.Continued

Table 2 .
Results of relevant studies using electronic tongues in the characterization and identification in the food matrices.

Table 3 .
Results of relevant studies using colorimeter in the characterization and identification in the food matrices.

Table 4 .
Results of relevant studies with CVS in the characterization and identification of food matrices.

Table 5 .
Results of relevant studies using TPA in in the food industry.

Table 6 .
Results of relevant studies on the relationship between EMG and food texture.

Table 7 .
Results of relevant studies on the relationship between acoustic analysis and texture of food.

have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard. Version 1
Food Research International.2021; 147: 110477.PubMed Abstract|Publisher Full TextAltmann BA, Gertheiss J, Tomasevic I, et al.: Human perception of color differences using computer vision system measurements of raw pork loin.Meat Science.2022; 188: 108766.This is an open access peer review report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.