F1000Research F1000Research 2046-1402 F1000 Research Limited London, UK 10.12688/f1000research.133230.2 Research Article Articles Indocyanine green based antimicrobial photodynamic therapy as an adjunct to non-surgical periodontal treatment in periodontal maintenance patients: a clinico-microbiological study

[version 2; peer review: 3 approved, 1 not approved]

 Roy Chowdhury Urbashi Conceptualization Formal Analysis Funding Acquisition Investigation Methodology Project Administration Resources Visualization Writing – Original Draft Preparation 1 Kamath Deepa Conceptualization Data Curation Formal Analysis Funding Acquisition Project Administration Supervision Validation Visualization Writing – Review & Editing https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8546-9590 a 2 Rao Pooja Investigation Methodology Writing – Review & Editing https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0717-783X 3 Shenoy M Suchitra Investigation Methodology Writing – Review & Editing https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1425-0097 4 Shenoy Ramya Methodology Software Validation Writing – Review & Editing https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3126-4415 5 Ex-Post graduate Trainee, Periodontology, Manipal College of Dental Sciences, Mangalore, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, 575001, India Professor, Periodontology, Manipal College of Dental Sciences, Mangalore, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, 575001, India Assosiate Professior, Microbiology, Kasturba Medical College, Mangalore, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, 575001, India Professor and Head, Microbiology, Kasturba Medical College, Mangalore, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, 575001, India Professor and Head, Public Health Dentistry, Manipal College of Dental Sciences, Mangalore, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, 575001, India deepa.gkamath@manipal.edu

No competing interests were disclosed.

 20 8 2024 2023 12 949 15 8 2024 Copyright: © 2024 Roy Chowdhury U et al. 2024 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Background: Antimicrobial Photodynamic therapy for the treatment of periodontitis is being increasingly gaining attention but at present, very limited data are available on the clinical and microbiological outcomes obtained following Indocyanine Green as the photosensitizer in Maintenance patients. The objective was to evaluate the efficiency of Indocyanine(ICG)-green based photodynamic therapy as an adjunct to scaling and root planing in patients enrolled in maintenance therapy.

Methodology: Using a split mouth study design, 24 participants enrolled in the maintenance therapy, having diagnosed as Periodontitis, were randomly subjected to scaling and root planing(SRP). The test group additionally received ICG-based (Aurogreen ®, Aurolabs, Madurai, India,1mg/ml) aPDT with an 810nm diode laser. Clinical assessment of Plaque index, modified Sulcus bleeding index, Probing pocket depth, Clinical loss of attachment and microbiological analysis of A. actinomycetemcomitans, P. gingivalis, T. forsythia and F.nucleatum were performed at baseline and 3 months after treatment.

Results: It was observed that although there was no significant difference between the test and control group at baseline and 3 months, there was a statistically significant reduction in the mean values in both the groups at 3 months. Microbiological analysis showed substantial reduction in detection frequency of the bacteria assessed at 3 months in both the groups.

Conclusion: Within the limits of the study, ICG-based aPDT did not show additional advantage over SRP alone at 3 months, though it could be a promising treatment modality in maintenance patients in terms of patient comfort and the treatment time taken. More randomised clinical trials should be employed to understand the exact mode of action of ICG based aPDT and its role in treatment of periodontal disease.

 Periodontal disease Chronic periodontitis Residual periodontal pockets Photodynamic therapy Laser Therapy Indocyanine Green Maintenance therapy Photosensitizers. Manipal Academy of Higher Education The study was partially funded by the Institutional Ethics Committee Manipal College of Dental Sciences, Mangaluru. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. Amendments from Version 1

Amendments from version 1 In the Treatment protocol section Treatment subheading The first sentence was modified:  At day zero, patients fulfilling the inclusion criteria were subjected to full mouth SRP. According to the randomisation the test sites were then treated with PDT which is explained as follows. Immediately after full mouth SRP, the test sites were properly dried using air syringe to receive the photosensitizer. 0.5ml of the dye was then the photosensitizer (0.5 mL) was the photosensitizer (0.5 mL) was applied in the test site using a syringe.  The Last sentence was modified:  All the patients were monitored for 3 months. They were blinded throughout the procedure and study period to maintain the integrity of the assignment. Results Section Clinical Parameters subheading The values were modified :  There was statistical significance from baseline to 3 months regarding PD with values of 5.57±0.21mm 1.73±0.42mm and 3.33±0.31mm 1.73±0.42 mm and 1.22±0.43 mm respectively for the test group and 5.57±0.24mm 1.70±0.46mm and 1.28±0.42mm2.84±0.44mm 1.70±0.46 mm and 1.28±0.42 mm respectively for the control group (P value <0.05). Similarly, for gain in CAL in the test group, there was a statistically significant difference from baseline (5.57±0.21mm1.77±0.40 mm) to 3 months (3.37±0.33mm1.27±0.41mm) and in the control group from baseline (5.57±0.24mm1.73±0.46 mm) to 3 months (3.14±0.55mm1.30±0.41 mm) (P value <0.05). Data from Table 3 has been modified. Microbiological parameters Table 4 showing detection frequency of organisms at baseline and 3 months using Mc Nemar P test has been added.

 Introduction

Periodontitis is a result of an exaggerated reaction of the host tissue in response to the microbial challenge which ultimately leads to loss of hard and soft tissues of the periodontium. 1 With this sort of a continuous microbial challenge, the periodontal tissues are subjected to toxic bacterial (virulence) factors that have the potential to alter various host cell operations. Periodontal therapy is primarily aimed at removal of these hard tissue and soft tissue deposits from the root surface to prevent progression of the disease. This is achieved by means of scaling and root planing (SRP) by hand and/or power driven instruments. 2 However, in spite of being the standard of care for treatment of periodontal disease, SRP may not be sufficient to completely remove all periodontal pathogens. 3 The varied clinical presentations such as deep pockets, presence of furcations or intrabony defects may render mechanical debridement inadequate for disruption of the tenacious biofilm which is the primary niche of putative periodontal pathogens.

LASER technology have been around for quite some time now and is currently in the 4 th decade in the dental field. It holds a promising non-invasive mode of treatment when it comes to periodontal therapy. 4 As discussed previously, periodontal disease causing bacteria not only accumulates on the hard tissue but also can invade the soft tissues of the periodontium. In this regard, Diode lasers have proven to be a boon because they are nothing but soft tissue lasers which have an affinity for pigment containing cells for example black pigmented bacteria (spirochetes). 5 LASER also exerts an antibacterial effect which may be further improved by the addition of a photosensitizing dye. This phenomenon is known as photodynamic therapy (PDT). 6 Indocyanine green is one such photosensitizer which absorbs wavelength at a range of 750-950 nm with a maximum value of 810 nm and exerts its main action by photo-thermal effect which induces cell damage by increasing intracellular temperature. 7 PDT includes a photochemical reaction mediated by oxygen which gets activated on application of light in the presence of a photosensitizing compound that leads to generation of highly reactive nascent oxygen species that are toxic to the microorganisms. The Major advantages of antimicrobial PDT (aPDT) are that they explicitly target cells, causing no collateral damage to non-pigmented host tissue cells and is only initiated when laser light is irradiated. It also lacks the development of resistant bacterial species, which is common with injudicious use of antibiotics. 6

Residual pockets may contain periodontal pathogens persistently and may even re-harbour these microorganisms which are incompatible with periodontal health. 8 Therefore, such sites need special professional attention. Re-instrumentation repeatedly in these sites may cumulatively cause damage to the hard tissues, thereby calling for maintenance protocols for residual pockets which are efficient even after repeated application. 9

Recent body of evidence have shown that adjunctive use of PDT with SRP for treatment of residual periodontal pocket may provide additional improvement and better outcomes. However, there is no available literature which have evaluated the efficacy of the treatment protocol using indocyanine green as a photosensitizer in photodynamic therapy in maintenance patients. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to assess the changes in clinical and microbiological parameters following multiple applications of PDT using indocyanine green and diode laser along with SRP in treating patients enrolled in periodontal maintenance programme.

 Methods Patient population and study design

The present split-mouth, double-blinded, randomized controlled clinical trial comprised of 25 patients suiting the inclusion criteria. They were recruited from Department of Periodontology, Manipal College of Dental Sciences, Mangalore, India from December 2021 to January 2023.

 Ethical approval

The study protocol was reviewed and approved by Institutional Research Ethics Committee and was conducted in accordance with Helsinki Declaration 1975, as revised in 2013(registered at Clinical Trial Registry India as CTRI/2023/01/61447).

 Informed consent

Informed consent was taken from all participants intimating them the nature, potential risks, and benefits of their participation in the study. They were free to withdraw from the study at their will. The information sheet and consent form can be found as Extended data.

 Sample size calculation

Reference of the present study was taken from Grzech lesniak et al. 10 An effect size of 0.2 was considered with a 95% confidence interval and 80% power. Thus, a sample size of 25 was calculated for this split mouth design.

 Inclusion criteria

Aged above 18 years

Chronic periodontitis with residual pockets of ≥4 mm in two different quadrants of the mouth, after completion of active periodontal treatment and currently under maintenance

FMPS ≤ 25% (Full-mouth plaque score)

FMBS ≤ 25% (Full-mouth bleeding score)

Exclusion criteria

Systemic illness that would compromise periodontal status

patient on immune-depressant, anti-epileptic, calcium antagonist, blood thinners.

Smokers (5 cigarette or more per day)

Use of systemic antibiotics in the last twelve months

Pregnancy

Allocation of the study groups and Blinding

The subjects were arbitrarily allocated to either of the interventions: A) (SRP) with antimicrobial photodynamic therapy (aPDT) on right side; SRP on left side or B) SRP right side and aPDT on left side. Selected sites were randomly assigned to one of the two treatment modalities by a computer generated block randomization (allocation ratio of 1:1) before each intervention procedure. A third staff member (RS) who wasn’t directly involved in the study carried out the randomization. Opaque sealed envelopes were used to conceal the allocation sequence. The primary investigator, outcome assessor, biostatistician as well as the patients were unaware of the details of the series of the study. As and when a patient came and fit the criteria for the study, the envelope was opened and treatment protocol was followed as described below.

Treatment protocol

Periodontal measurements

All 25 Patients underwent full mouth clinical periodontal assessment around all teeth by a single calibrated examiner (DK) following the CONSORT guidelines ( Figure 1: consort flow chart). 11 The measurements were taken at four sites per tooth (distal, mesial, facial/buccal, lingual/palatal) using a University of North Carolina No.15 periodontal probe (Hu-friedy™, Chicago IL) and Customized acrylic stents were prepared to guide the probe placement in the same plane. Clinical variables included the measurements of plaque index (PI), modified sulcular bleeding index (mSBI), probing pocket depth (PD) and clinical attachment level (CAL). PD was measured as the distance between the gingival margin and the base of the pocket and CAL was calculated as the distance from the CEJ and the bottom of the sulcus or of the periodontal pocket. The primary outcome being probing depth and clinical attachment level based on the number of sites and secondary outcome being plaque index and bleeding index.

Consort flow diagram reporting the enrolled, treated and evaluated patients.

Preparation of indocyanine green

Under aseptic circumstances a fresh 5 mg/mL solution with the photosensitizer dye Indocyanine green (Aurogreen ®, Aurolabs, Madurai, India) was prepared. In 5ml of sterile water, ICG is dissolved to prepare an initial 5 mg/mL ICG stock solution. This solution is further diluted in saline solution at the ratio of 1:5 to achieve the final ICG concentration of 5 mg/mL. 12 The aqueous solution becomes unstable on coming in contact with the environment and hence should be utilised on the same day within 10 hours.

Laser parameters

The laser system used in the study is Diode laser (Picasso AMD) with wavelength of 810 nm. It was applied in a continuous mode, circumferentially around the tooth, with a power of 2 W for 60 s. Total energy produced is 6 J/cm 2.

Microbiological assessment

Microbiological samples were collected through plaque from the deepest periodontal pockets at baseline and three months after therapy using sterile curettes ( Figure 2). They were then transferred to Eppendorf tubes containing 500 μL of sterile phosphate buffer saline (PBS). Microbiological analysis consisted of a molecular test for the detection of four periodontal pathogens. The test was performed with Multiplex PCR (polymerase chain reaction) method. Bacterial DNA was extracted using DNA thermal cycler (ProFlex™ 3× 32-well PCR System, Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) following the instructions of the manufacturer ( Table 1).

Sample collection with curette. Primers used in PCR analysis.
Bacteria Primer sequence Basepairs Thermal conditions
Aa 5′-TACTAATTAAGTGGGAAA-3′ 5′-ATCTCTCAGTGTTAATAG-3′ 637 basepair 95°C for 15 minutes for Initial denaturation 40 cycles - 95°C for 30 seconds, 60°C for 1 minute, 72°C for 1 minute. 72°C for 10 minutes for final extension
Pg 5′-GGAGAACCTACTGGAAAG-3′ 5′-GGAGTTTATCTGGACTTGA-3′ 637 basepair 95°C for 15 minutes for Initial denaturation 40 cycles - 95°C for 30 seconds, 60°C for 1 minute, 72°C for 1 minute. 72°C for 10 minutes for final extension
Tf 5′-GTTAAGGTAACATTAGGT-3′ 5′-TTTATCGTAGATCAGAAT-3′ 600 basepair 95°C for 15 minutes for Initial denaturation 40 cycles - 95°C for 30 seconds, 60°C for 1 minute, 72°C for 1 minute. 72°C for 10 minutes for final extension
Fn 5′-CAACACCTAGTAATCATC-3′ 5′-CGAATGCTAATACCTATA-3′ 653 basepair 95°C for 15 minutes for Initial denaturation 40 cycles - 95°C for 30 seconds, 60°C for 1 minute, 72°C for 1 minute. 72°C for 10 minutes for final extension

Aa - Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans, Pg - Porphyromonas gingivalis, Tf - Fusobacterium nucleatum, Fn - Tannerella forsythia

The following periodontal pathogenic species were analysed:

Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans

Porphyromonas gingivalis

Fusobacterium nucleatum

Tannerella forsythia

Treatment

At day zero, patients fulfilling the inclusion criteria were subjected to full mouth SRP. According to the randomisation the test sites were then treated with PDT which is explained as follows. Immediately after full mouth SRP, the test sites were properly dried using air syringe to receive the photosensitizer. 0.5 ml of the dye was then applied in the test site using a syringe. To avoid ‘carry-across’ effect, a conscious effort was made to not spill the photosensitizer in other parts of the oral cavity. Anyhow, the dye is not known to get activated without laser light. Distilled water was used after 2 minutes to wash out the free photosensitizer. The 810 nm diode soft tissue laser was brought in contact with the gingival tissues below the gingival margin and light was applied for 60 seconds in a circumferential manner around the tooth. The laser fibre tip was kept in contact with the soft tissue wall constantly ( Figure 3). The strokes addressed small sections and were systematically overlapping. The fibre tip was continually inspected to remove any accumulated debris with water moistened gauze. aPDT was repeated after 14 days.

Application of LASER in the test group.

The contralateral site received sham LASER which imitated the irradiation without it being turned on. All the patients were monitored for 3 months. They were blinded throughout the procedure and study period to maintain the integrity of the assignment.

 Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was done for all the clinical parameters and microbiological parameters. Mean and standard deviation was calculated at baseline and at 3 months’ follow-up. Data was analysed using paired ‘t’ test for plaque index, gingival index, clinical attachment level and probing depth at baseline and at 3 months’ follow-up. Mc Nemar P test and Fischer exact P test were used for microbiological parameters. Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS), version 17 (SPSS Inc, Chicago IL) was the used software. A P value of <0.05 was considered significant.

 Results General data

This split mouth, single centre, randomised controlled trial was done for a period of 3 months. There were no unwanted events reported by any patient throughout the study. Out of 25 subjects initially recruited, one was lost to drop out and subsequently 24 patients were carried forward for analysis. 10 participants were females and 14 were males, aged between 30 and 78 years. The age and sex distribution of both groups were uniform (P>0.05) ( Table 2). A total of 130 teeth were examined, 66 in test group and 64 in control group, with 171 intervention sites: 86 in test group and 85 in control group.

Demographic features of study population.
Variable All N=25
Age (mean ± SD) 48.1 ± 11.5.
Gender N %
Male 14 58%
Female 10 42%

SD - Standard Deviation.

 Clinical parameters

The participants in the study showed decreased full mouth plaque score (FMPS) and full mouth bleeding score (FMBS) that is <25%. This signifies that all of them had maintained an optimum standard of oral hygiene throughout the study period. The results also showed a substantial reduction of PI, mSBI throughout the study period in both groups with P value of <0.000 ( Table 3).

Comparison of changes in clinical parameters (in mm) of both groups at different time intervals.
Clinical parameters Groups Baseline 3 months Baseline vs 3 months, P value
PI Test group 1.7±0.25 1.14±0.23 0.000 *
Control group 1.65±0.32 1.16±0.18 0.000 *
P value 0.5 † 0.6 †
SBI Test group 1.82±0.24 1.05±0.26 0.000 *
Control group 1.69±0.42 1.01± 0.15 0.000 *
P value 0.2 † 0.6 †
PPD Test group 5.57±0.21 3.33±0.31 0.000 *
Control group 5.57±0.24 2.84±0.44 0.000 *
P value 0.2 † 0.6 †
CAL Test group 5.57±0.21 3.37±0.33 0.000 *
Control group 5.57±0.24 3.14±0.55 0.000 *
P value 0.8 † 0.6 †

Statistically significant at P<0.05.

Not statistically significant at P>0.05.

There was statistical significance from baseline to 3 months regarding PD with values of 5.57±0.21 mm and 3.33±0.31 mm respectively for the test group and 5.57±0.24 mm and 2.84±0.44 mm respectively for the control group (P value <0.05). Similarly, for gain in CAL in the test group, there was a statistically significant difference from baseline (5.57±0.21 mm) to 3 months (3.37±0.33 mm) and in the control group from baseline (5.57±0.24 mm) to 3 months (3.14±0.55 mm) (P value <0.05). However, intergroup comparison of PD and CAL did not show any statistical significance at any given period (P>0.05) ( Table 3).

 Microbiological parameters

All groups exhibited a substantial decrease in the detection frequency of A.a, P.g, T.f, F.n from baseline till the termination of the study ( Figure 4: test) and ( Figure 5: control). Both the groups showed equally greater reduction in detection frequency of P.g and T.f at 3 months ( Table 4).

Detection frequency (%) of A.a, P.g, F.n, T.f in Test group at baseline and at 3 months. Detection frequency (%) of A.a, P.g, F.n, T.f in control group at baseline and at 3 months. Detection frequency of organisms at baseline and 3 months.
Pathogen Time interval Test group Control group
Frequency of organisms present (%) Frequency (%)
Aggregatibacter Actinomycetemcomitans * baseline 20 (83.3) 19 (79.2)
3 months 5 (20.8) 3 (12.5)
Porphyromonas gingivalis * baseline 22 (91.7) 22 (91.7)
3 months 5 (20.8) 3 (12.5)
Fusobacter nucleatum ** baseline 7 (29.2) 6 (25)
3 months 0 0
Tannerella forsythia * baseline 19 (79.2) 19 (79.2)
3 months 2 2 (8.3)

Using Mc Nemar P test, Detection of frequency of organisms between test and control group was found to be not statistically significant.(p>0.05).

p value could not be calculated as expected frequency was ‘0’ at 3 months for both the groups.

 Discussion

The corner-stone of cause-related therapy is considered to be non-surgical periodontal therapy (NSPT) which encompasses the removal of supragingival and subgingival biofilm and calculus. 13 Yet, a number of ‘residual pockets’ often remain after non-surgical periodontal therapy. 14 Residual pockets, particularly >4 mm, have shown to be a positive predictor of clinical loss of attachment over the years and hence represents a clinical scenario which is more difficult to treat than a patient of untreated periodontitis 15 . 16 Photodynamic therapy has been used in periodontal treatment for over a quarter of a century now. They are being increasingly used as adjunctive treatment with NSPT and eliminates disadvantage such as bacterial resistance seen with systemic or local antibiotics. 17

This study focussed on evaluating the clinical and microbiological effects of antimicrobial photodynamic therapy using indocyanine green in patients enrolled in maintenance therapy, having residual pockets. The use of a split mouth design in the present study provided an advantage over parallel design study where the same subject served as control, hence comparison of all treatment methods could be done under similar and optimally standard healing periods. A statistically significant improvement was seen at 3 months for plaque scores and bleeding scores in both the intervention groups without any intergroup differences at any given point. There was a significant reduction in the probing pocket depth and considerable gain in clinical attachment level at the end of 3 months in both groups ( Figure 6). However, the difference between the two groups were not statistically significant. There are studies which are in agreement with the present study 6 , 18 . 19 A systematic review by Azarpazhooh et al. (2010) demonstrated that PDT as a treatment modality whether stand-alone or as adjunct, was not superior to SRP therapy alone. 20

A,Pre-operative probing depth of test site - 5 mm; B, Pre-operative Probing pocket depth of control site – 5 mm; C,3 months post-operative probing pocket depth of test site – 3 mm; D, 3 months post-operative probing pocket depth of control site - 3 mm.

However, a systematic review of four RCTs by Xue et al(2017) stated that additional clinical improvement were observed in SRP+PDT group compared to SRP alone for residual pockets for supportive periodontal therapy. 21 As none of the studies used Indocyanine green as the photosensitizer, no clear-cut conclusion can be drawn. With that, coming to the next aspect- the photosensitizer, majority of available literature on PDT demonstrate the use of conventional photosensitizers that are methylene blue or toluidine blue. The present randomised controlled trial is the first to determine the outcome of PDT using Indocyanine Green as the photosensitizing agent in treatment of residual pockets in maintenance therapy patients. However, the outcomes in the current study, though favourable at 3 months, did not prove added benefits of ICG compared to SRP alone. This is not commensurate with previous studies utilising ICG as photosensitizing agent. A systematic review conducted by Bashir et al (2021) concluded that ICG mediated PDT in treatment of periodontitis significantly improved the clinical outcomes compared to SRP alone. 22 This disparity may be due to the fact that there is no standardised protocol for use of soft tissue diode LASER and the frequency of antimicrobial PDT application for treatment of periodontal disease. Lack of standardisation eliminates many studies for analysis in systematic reviews. Also, the utilisation of ICG in the field of periodontitis is relatively new hence it should be acknowledged that there may have been studies which are yet in the process of trial, or have gone through publication.

Regarding microbiological analysis, the detection frequencies of the 4 major putative periodontal pathogens were analysed. The detection frequencies of P.g, A.a, T.f, F.n were significantly lower at 3 months ( Figure 7). Even though the detection frequency lowered at the end of the study for all the pathogens, there was no statistical significance in any of the groups from baseline to 3 months. This may be due to the fact that the sample size for the present study was limited and for analysis of non-parametric variable such as the absence or presence of micro-organisms, a bigger sample size is necessary to demonstrate the effectiveness of the treatment modality.

PCR Gel documentation; A, Pre-operative detection frequency of <italic toggle="yes">A.a, T.f, F.n and P.g;</italic> B,Post-operative identification of organisms at 3 months.

No intergroup association was observed with respect to the presence of bacteria. Similar results were reported by Chondros et al. (2009), 18 Polansky et al. (2009), 23 De Micheli et al. (2011) 24 and Giannopoulou et al. (2012). 25 Polansky and group tested for P. gingivalis, T. forsythia and T. denticola at baseline and at 3 months. The levels of prevotella species (P.g) had significantly come down in both the groups. No significant reductions of T. forsythia and T. denticola were observed in either groups. Moreover, DeMicheli and group (2011) did not observe any additional reduction in the bacterial species in the test group (diode laser with SRP). Similar to the present study where the detection frequency of each organism tested, reduced significantly at 3 months, a systematic review of 17 randomised controlled clinical trials, by Akram et al. (2016) 26 concluded that adjunctive PDT application led to a reduction of the following species A.a, P.g, T. f, and T.d equal to the control group (SRP alone). This was in line with another study by Cappuyns et al. (2011) 19 who demonstrated that detection frequency of P.g, T.f and T.d significantly reduced 2 and 6 months following intervention in all the groups that is SRP, DSL and PDT and that one procedure was not superior to the other.

The present study employed two sittings of PDT application similar to an earlier study by Segarra (2017) that have shown at least two applications of PDT is necessary to achieve the expected outcome. 27 On the contrary a study by Müller Campanile et al. (2015) demonstrated that the number of applications is not proportional to better outcomes of PDT. 28 Although there are not many systematic reviews to authenticate the statement, most of the available literature regarding the number of sittings of PDT emphasize of multiple sittings of atleast 2 or more than 2 to attain the desired effect 29 . 30 Maybe future trials can implement more than 2 sittings for treating residual pockets.

It is noteworthy to consider other limitations of the present study. Firstly, a bigger sample size is necessary to validate the use of indocyanine based PDT in maintenance patients. The time period taken as 3 months for the duration of the study provided a short term overview about the effect of different treatment modalities. A longer study period can be implied in future studies. There could be chances that the periodontopathogens could translocate from one niche to another within the oral cavity- which is known as intraoral translocation. This may explain the variable results obtained within the same patients from different treatment modalities.

 Conclusion

To date, successful application of antimicrobial photodynamic therapy remains conflicting and insufficient. This is because of the variation in methodology, poorly defined treatment parameters and the lack of a standard protocol in form of dosimetry or appropriate illumination devices. The present study does not show additional benefits of PDT over SRP; however, it does not negate the role of PDT with indocyanine green. Improvement was seen in the test and control group alike at the termination of the study period, though not statistically significant. Hence, future investigations should aim at standardising the treatment protocols of LASER, utilising indocyanine green in treatment of residual pockets, in a larger population. Furthermore, a quantitative analysis of the micro-organisms should be intended which would give us an enhanced understanding and prove the efficacy of ICG based antimicrobial photodynamic therapy.

 Data availability Underlying data

Figshare: Underlying data for “Indocyanine green based antimicrobial photodynamic therapy as an adjunct to non-surgical periodontal treatment in periodontal maintenance patients: a clinico-microbiological study”. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.23573952. 31

The project contains the following underlying data:

Data file 1: Master chart containing raw data of both test group and control group at baseline and at 3 months (Table containing the raw data of the study)

Extended data

Figshare: Extended data for “Indocyanine green based antimicrobial photodynamic therapy as an adjunct to non-surgical periodontal treatment in periodontal maintenance patients: a clinico-microbiological study”. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.23574150. 32

The project contains the following underlying data:

Case Performa

Informed consent form in English

Ethical Committee Approval letter

Reporting guidelines

Figshare: CONSORT check list and flow chart for “Indocyanine green based antimicrobial photodynamic therapy as an adjunct to non-surgical periodontal treatment in periodontal maintenance patients: a clinico-microbiological study”, https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.23574162. 33

Data are available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (CC-BY 4.0).

 References Haffajee AD Socransky SS : Microbiology of periodontal diseases: introduction. Periodontol. 2005;38(1):9–12. 10.1111/j.1600-0757.2005.00112.x Cobb CM : Clinical significance of non-surgical periodontal therapy: an evidence-based perspective of scaling and root planing. J. Clin. Periodontol. 2002;29:22–32. 10.1034/j.1600-051X.29.s2.4.x Slots J Rosling BG : Suppression of the periodontopathic microflora in localized juvenile periodontitis by systemic tetracycline. J. Clin. Periodontol. 1983;10(5):465–486. 10.1111/j.1600-051X.1983.tb02179.x Cobb CM : Lasers and the treatment of periodontitis: the essence and the noise. Periodontol. 2017;75(1):205–295. 28758295 10.1111/prd.12137 Konopka K Goslinski T : Photodynamic Therapy in Dentistry. J. Dent. Res. 2007;86(8):694–707. 10.1177/154405910708600803 Chondros P Nikolidakis D Christodoulides N : Photodynamic therapy as adjunct to non-surgical periodontal treatment in patients on periodontal maintenance: A randomized controlled clinical trial. Lasers Med. Sci. 2009;24(5):681–688. 18465191 10.1007/s10103-008-0565-z Houthoofd S Vuylsteke M Mordon S : Photodynamic therapy for atherosclerosis. The potential of indocyanine green. Photodiagn. Photodyn. Ther. 2020;29:101568. 31627015 10.1016/j.pdpdt.2019.10.003 Mombelli A Schmid B Rutar A : Persistence Patterns of Porphyromonas gingivalis, Prevotella intermedia/nigrescens, and Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans After Mechanical Therapy of Periodontal Disease. J. Periodontol. 2000;71(1):14–21. 10695934 10.1902/jop.2000.71.1.14 Lang NP : Group B. Reactor report. Non-surgical periodontal therapy: mechanical debridement, antimicrobial agents and other modalities. J. Int. Acad. Periodontol. 2015;17(1 Suppl):31–33. 25764588 Grzech-Leśniak K Gaspirc B Sculean A : Clinical and microbiological effects of multiple applications of antibacterial photodynamic therapy in periodontal maintenance patients. A randomized controlled clinical study. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther. 2019;27:44–50. 31125767 10.1016/j.pdpdt.2019.05.028 Pandis N Chung B Scherer RW : CONSORT 2010 statement: extension checklist for reporting within person randomised trials. BMJ. June 30, 2017;357:j2835. 28667088 10.1136/bmj.j2835 PMC5492474 Sethi K Raut C : Antimicrobial photodynamic therapy using indocyanine green as a photosensitizer in treatment of chronic periodontitis: A clinico-microbial study. Indian J. Dent. Res. 2019. 10.4103/ijdr. IJDR_14_17 Graziani F Karapetsa D Alonso B : Nonsurgical and surgical treatment of periodontitis: how many options for one disease? Periodontol. 2017;75(1):152–188. 28758300 10.1111/prd.12201 Adriaens PA Adriaens LM : Effects of nonsurgical periodontal therapy on hard and soft tissues. Periodontol. 2004;36(1):121–145. 10.1111/j.1600-0757.2004.03676.x Claffey N Nylund K Kiger R : Diagnostic predictability of scores of plaque, bleeding, suppuration and probing depth for probing attachment loss. 31/2-years of observation following initial periodontal therapy. J. Clin. Periodontol. 1990;17(2):108–114. 2406292 10.1111/j.1600-051X.1990.tb01071.x Chapple ILC Mealey BL Van Dyke TE : Periodontal health and gingival diseases and conditions on an intact and a reduced periodontium: Consensus report of workgroup 1 of the 2017 World Workshop on the Classification of Periodontal and Peri-Implant Diseases and Conditions. J. Periodontol. 2018;89:S74–S84. 29926944 10.1002/JPER.17-0719 Ardila CM Granada MI Guzmán IC : Antibiotic resistance of subgingival species in chronic periodontitis patients. J. Periodontal Res. June 10, 2010;45:557–563. 20546113 10.1111/j.1600-0765.2010.01274.x Chondros P Nikolidakis D Christodoulides N : Photodynamic therapy as adjunct to non-surgical periodontal treatment in patients on periodontal maintenance: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Lasers Med. Sci. 2009;24(5):681–688. 18465191 10.1007/s10103-008-0565-z Cappuyns I Cionca N Wick P : Treatment of residual pockets with photodynamic therapy, diode laser, or deep scaling. A randomized, split-mouth controlled clinical trial. Lasers Med. Sci. 2012;27(5):979–986. 22105837 10.1007/s10103-011-1027-6 Azarpazhooh A Shah PS Tenenbaum HC : The Effect of Photodynamic Therapy for Periodontitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J. Periodontol. 2010;81(1):4–14. 10.1902/jop.2009.090285 Xue D Zhao Y : Clinical effectiveness of adjunctive antimicrobial photodynamic therapy for residual pockets during supportive periodontal therapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Photodiagn. Photodyn. Ther. 2017;17:127–133. 27888165 10.1016/j.pdpdt.2016.11.011 Bashir NZ Singh H-A Virdee SS : Indocyanine green–mediated antimicrobial photodynamic therapy as an adjunct to periodontal therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin. Oral Investig. 2021;25(10):5699–5710. 33710461 10.1007/s00784-021-03871-2 PMC8443506 Polansky R Haas M Heschl A : Clinical effectiveness of photodynamic therapy in the treatment of periodontitis. J. Clin. Periodontol. 2009;36(7):575–580. 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2009.01412.x De Micheli G Andrade AKP de Alves VTE : Efficacy of high intensity diode laser as an adjunct to non-surgical periodontal treatment: a randomized controlled trial. Lasers Med. Sci. 2011;26(1):43–48. 20131073 10.1007/s10103-009-0753-5 Giannopoulou C Cappuyns I Cancela J : Effect of Photodynamic Therapy, Diode Laser, and Deep Scaling on Cytokine and Acute-Phase Protein Levels in Gingival Crevicular Fluid of Residual Periodontal Pockets. J. Periodontol. 2012;83(8):1018–1027. 22181685 10.1902/jop.2011.110281 Akram Z Al-Shareef SAA Daood U : Bactericidal Efficacy of Photodynamic Therapy Against Periodontal Pathogens in Periodontal Disease: A Systematic Review. Photomed. Laser Surg. 2016;34(4):137–149. 26982216 10.1089/pho.2015.4076 Segarra-Vidal M Guerra-Ojeda S Vallés LS : Effects of photodynamic therapy in periodontal treatment: A randomized, controlled clinical trial. J. Clin. Periodontol. 2017;44(9):915–925. 10.1111/jcpe.12768 Müller Campanile VS Giannopoulou C Campanile G : Single or repeated antimicrobial photodynamic therapy as adjunct to ultrasonic debridement in residual periodontal pockets: clinical, microbiological, and local biological effects. Lasers Med. Sci. 2015;30(1):27–34. 23660738 10.1007/s10103-013-1337-y PMC4289155 Muzaheed AS Hakami AR : Effectiveness of single versus multiple sessions of photodynamic therapy as adjunct to scaling and root planing on periodontopathogenic bacteria in patients with periodontitis. Photodiagn. Photodyn. Ther. 2020;32:102035. 33011399 10.1016/j.pdpdt.2020.102035 Ivanaga CA Miessi DMJ Nuernberg MAA : Antimicrobial photodynamic therapy (aPDT) with curcumin and LED, as an enhancement to scaling and root planing in the treatment of residual pockets in diabetic patients: A randomized and controlled split-mouth clinical trial. Photodiagn. Photodyn. Ther. 2019;27:388–395. 31301434 10.1016/j.pdpdt.2019.07.005 Roy Chowdhury U Kamath DG Rao P : Master chart containing raw data of both test group and control group at baseline and at 3 months.Dataset. figshare. 2022. 10.6084/m9.figshare.23573952 Roy Chowdhury U Kamath DG Rao P : Extended data.Dataset. figshare. 2022. 10.6084/m9.figshare.23574150 Roy Chowdhury U Kamath DG Rao P : Repository data.Dataset. figshare. 2022. 10.6084/m9.figshare.23574162 10.5256/f1000research.170408.r322362 Reviewer response for version 2 Thomas Biju 1 Referee https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8908-1019 A.B. Shetty Memorial Institute of Dental Science , Nitte University, Mangaluru, India

Competing interests: No competing interests were disclosed.

 13 9 2024 Copyright: © 2024 Thomas B 2024 This is an open access peer review report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. recommendation approve

Indocyanine green based antimicrobial photodynamic therapy as an adjunct to non-surgical periodontal treatment in periodontal maintenance patients: a clinico-microbiological study. This split mouth study with 24 participants is well designed to evaluate the efficacy of photodynamic therapy as an adjunct in periodontal disease management. The study is novel in the use of  indocyanine green as the photosensitizer . The methodology and treatment protocol are clear. Results are clearly documented. The limitations of the study like possible intra oral translocation is highlighted. This is a novel study on a topic that has shown conflicting results.

Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?

Yes

If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?

Yes

Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?

Yes

Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?

Yes

Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?

Yes

Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?

Yes

Reviewer Expertise:

stem cells applications in periodontal therapy, periodontal diseases management etc

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard.

 10.5256/f1000research.170408.r318749 Reviewer response for version 2 Rao Anupama 1 Referee Yenepoya Dental college, Mangalore, India

Competing interests: No competing interests were disclosed.

 12 9 2024 Copyright: © 2024 Rao A 2024 This is an open access peer review report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. recommendation approve

Authors have meticulously worked on study design methodology. Results are appropriately explained with proper literature support. Recent Systematic review finding has been included in the discussion part. Results are not manipulated. this articles gives future direction and also speaks about limitations of the present lack of standardization of diode laser protocol.

Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?

Yes

If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?

Yes

Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?

Yes

Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?

Yes

Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?

Yes

Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?

Yes

Reviewer Expertise:

Microbiology, periodontal disease diagnosis and treatment

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard.

 10.5256/f1000research.146209.r222649 Reviewer response for version 1 Satpathy Anurag 1 Referee https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5648-4281 Department of Periodontics and Oral Implantology, Siksha 'O' Anusandhan University, Bhubaneswar, India

Competing interests: No competing interests were disclosed.

 1 7 2024 Copyright: © 2024 Satpathy A 2024 This is an open access peer review report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. recommendation reject

Authors have carried out the study "Indocyanine green based antimicrobial photodynamic therapy as an adjunct to non-surgical periodontal treatment in periodontal maintenance patients"

While PDT is an accepted treatment modality and research continues to unravel the inconsistencies in the evidence, there are several areas in the present study where there is deficiency and lack of clarity.

1. The timeline of treatment and its interval needs to be clarified. What was the time gap between the SRP and sample collection?

2. Authors state that the inclusion criteria is greater than 4 mm probing depth. However, the PD in both groups at baseline is less than 3 mm.

3. The McNemars test results are not presented

4. Split mouth design with microbial assessment comparison between treatment and control has the chances of relocation of microbes

5. PDT protocol is unclear.

Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?

Partly

If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?

Partly

Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?

Partly

Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?

No

Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?

No

Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?

No

Reviewer Expertise:

Periodontal Regeneration, Periodontal Microbiology, Autologus platelet concentrate, Periodontal Medicine

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to state that I do not consider it to be of an acceptable scientific standard, for reasons outlined above.

KAMATH DEEPA Manipal University, India

Competing interests: No competing interests were disclosed

 14 8 2024

1. The timeline of treatment and its interval needs to be clarified. What was the time gap between the SRP and sample collection?

Response : Changes done. PDT application was done at baseline and again after 14 days. However, the clinical and microbiological assessment was done at baseline and after 3 months only

2. Authors state that the inclusion criteria is greater than 4 mm probing depth. However, the  PD in both groups at baseline is less than 3 mm.

Response: The results were calculated as follows-

Sum of pocket depth of test/control sites of an individual divided by total number of sites of the selected teeth.

However, the calculations are re-checked and changes in the values are made.

3.The McNemars test results are not presented

Response: Changes done. Table 4 has been added showing the results of Mc Nemar P Test. The same had been depicted graphically in the old version.

4. Split mouth design with microbial assessment comparison between treatment and control has the chances of relocation of microbes

Response : This has been mentioned as one of the drawbacks of the study. Besides, there are no statistical tests to detect carry-across effect. However, split mouth designs do provide with better standardisation in terms of reduced variability.

5. PDT protocol is unclear.

Response: Changes done. a-PDT was carried out at baseline after completion of full mouth SRP of the selected individuals and repeated after 14 days. The preparation of dye was according to the instructions provided in the product manual. 

10.5256/f1000research.146209.r266858 Reviewer response for version 1 Setty Swati 1 Referee SDM College of Dental Sciences and Hospital, Dharwad, Karnataka, India

Competing interests: No competing interests were disclosed.

 1 7 2024 Copyright: © 2024 Setty S 2024 This is an open access peer review report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. recommendation approve

This manuscript has adopted a proper study design with the support of current literature. The need for research on photodynamic therapy has been described. The methodology of the study is adequate. The interpretation of the results is appropriate. Discussion includes the related literature of the study. Limitations have been explained correlating with the current evidence. The requirement for further research has been stated clearly.

Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?

Yes

If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?

Yes

Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?

Yes

Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?

Yes

Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?

Yes

Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?

Yes

Reviewer Expertise:

NA

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard.