Traditional forms of participation, such as popular consultations, public hearings, and municipal councils, have proven to be unviable in actively involving citizens in both local and national politics ( Berlanga et al., 2023). This is specifically evident in Lambayeque, where geographical, socioeconomic, and technological barriers hinder access to these spaces for social engagement ( Díaz, 2022). The existing methods of citizen participation are not adapted to the realities of the population, leading to a disaffection from politics, where citizens negatively assess their authorities and distance themselves from political matters ( Duárez, 2022). In this regard, it is necessary to create a renewed model that leverages new forms of participation and high-tech tools to increase society’s interaction with authorities ( Jara et al., 2021).

On the other hand, the inequalities between urban and rural areas still create a deep gap in accessing the political participation process. Rural communities, with their strong ties to the land and agriculture, often find themselves disconnected from political decision-making spaces, sinking into a sense of anti-political alienation ( Canaza, 2024). This phenomenon not only limits effective representation but also hinders the design of state policies that adequately respond to the specific needs of these communities. Therefore, in designing a new model of conventional participation through a more open and equitable system, social integration must be fulfilled ( Martínez et al., 2022).

In this context, a fundamental point in remodeling the participation model is the fusion of digital technologies, which offer a unique opportunity to overcome the physical and social barriers inherent in conventional participation. However, bringing technological tools to rural areas poses significant challenges, such as limited internet access and digital literacy ( Jara et al., 2021).

To some extent, the proposal to reinvent the participation model involves not only introducing new technologies but also broadening the approach to civic education ( Rodríguez, 2024). In this sense, the politics of disaffection is closely related to the lack of knowledge about how participation operates and exercising citizens’ rights. Therefore, it is essential to implement programs that strengthen not only political culture but also citizens’ civic sense ( Moyano & Solís, 2021). These programs should lead citizens not only to understand the importance of participation but also to provide them with concrete tools to interact effectively in both politics and society ( Megías & Moreno, 2022).

Civic education should be part of the participatory process as a prior and ongoing step, thus ensuring informed and committed participation. Furthermore, equal opportunities must be guaranteed for all social classes, regardless of geographical location, educational level, or virtual access ( Freire, 2023).

Methodologically, this study takes a quantitative approach with a non-experimental and descriptive proposal, allowing for the examination of various factors that increase the level of political disaffection among citizens.

Political disaffection in Lambayeque requires a comprehensive response that includes not only changes in traditional participation mechanisms but also accessible technological tools and civic education programs that encourage citizens to engage with subnational politics. The reconstruction of the conventional participation model needs not only to be digitized but also to foster an inclusive mindset regarding participation, thus instilling greater credibility in political institutions ( González & Salvatierra, 2021).

The study aimed to propose a model of conventional participation to mitigate political disaffection in Lambayeque, Peru. The specific objective was to determine the factors that lead to political disengagement in Lambayeque, Peru.

Finally, the following hypothesis was proposed: The implementation of an innovative citizen participation model in Lambayeque, Peru, will contribute to mitigating political disengagement.

Regarding international background, the study by Neves (2024) was cited, which analyzed the democratic discontent of youth and how this behavior can lead to democratic deconsolidation in various European contexts. The results revealed that the discontent of young people has become institutionalized non-democratic patterns, which has diminished their commitment to democracy. The study by Megías and Moreno (2022) aimed to verify the impact of social participation on reducing political disaffection in urban municipalities or districts in Germany, France, and Spain, with results indicating that as the level of social participation increases, a defined segment of politics can benefit. Similarly, Cárdenas (2022) identified the different characteristics or peculiarities of the political culture of voters regarding municipal candidates in a city like Bogotá, resulting in the finding that limited political knowledge allowed unsuitable political representatives to be elected, generating a proven disaffection characterized by distrust and distancing from institutions.

On the other hand, Alaminos et al. (2024) in their study propose characterizing political disaffection in a Latin American context, with results indicating that there are alternatives under which it is possible to define a historical-social subject, creating new patterns in democracy.

In the Peruvian context, Núñez Lira et al. (2020) examine the functioning of the structural problems facing politics in Peru, with a special emphasis on how citizens confront representative democracy. The results showed that the level of distrust in political institutions is increasingly higher, leading to a phenomenon of political disaffection over the past few years. Finally, Murakami and Pozsgai (2024) examined the factors that have contributed to the growing crisis of trust and political discouragement in various regions of Peru, concluding that fewer people participate in politics in general, as a consequence of unmet electoral promises.

Regarding the study variables, we have:

The results obtained in this research reflect a clear political disaffection among the population of the Lambayeque district. The majority of respondents show a medium level of political detachment, indicating a disconnection of citizens from the current political situation. However, a significant group also exhibits a high level of disaffection, reflecting a marked disinterest in political processes. This trend aligns with previous studies, such as Neves (2024), which observed high levels of democratic discontent in Europe, especially among young people, which could have parallels in the Peruvian context, albeit with unique characteristics in provincial regions.

The analysis of distrust in institutions reveals that the perception of corruption is one of the factors that most undermines citizens’ trust, affecting 23.3% of respondents. This perception coincides with the findings of Cárdenas (2022), who indicated that both misinformation and distrust in political representatives contribute to political disaffection. Moreover, the judicial system and the presidential administration are viewed with skepticism, with a 44.9% distrust towards the judicial system. These data corroborate the widespread perception that political institutions do not meet citizens’ expectations, something that Alaminos et al. (2024) refer to as key in the disconnection between politics and citizens.

Regarding electoral participation, the results show a low voting rate, indicating that many citizens feel demotivated or skeptical about the real impact of their vote on political decisions. This finding aligns with studies by Murakami and Pozsgai (2024), which detected a similar phenomenon in various regions of Peru, where indifference towards politics seems to have grown, despite interest in political issues. It can be inferred that, in addition to a lack of interest or knowledge, disaffection is also profoundly influenced by the perception of corruption and the ineffectiveness of political and judicial institutions. Studies by Cazorla et al. (2022) on disaffection in Latin America highlight how media can influence the exacerbation or moderation of these feelings of disconnection.

It is important to note that, although political interest remains high, the effectiveness of that interest in actual participation is limited. While citizens are informed about politics, many do not feel that their participation has a tangible impact, a phenomenon also observed in other contexts, as evidenced in Jiménez’s (2022) study on the relationship between social participation and political disaffection. This study indicated that increasing participation does not always reduce the gap between citizens and politics.

In conclusion, the results reveal that a large part of the population in Lambayeque has disconnected from politics in daily life, recording a general discomfort that may be reflected in upcoming elections, as that interest that does not translate into action is meaningless. The general distrust in institutions, especially the feeling of corruption, has fostered this detachment. Moreover, the results indicate a rejection of the political system; however, although many are knowledgeable about politics, the feeling of participation is one of impotence.

In the research process, 506 individuals selected from the population participated. It all began with sending an email to each participant, requesting their informed consent, which we received in writing through the same channel. Additionally, each participant was provided with a detailed explanation of the study, its objectives, and the methodologies we would use. For data collection, we used various digital tools, such as live meetings via Zoom and surveys through Google Forms, ensuring the privacy of the responses at all times.

All participants in this study provided their informed consent before their participation. A written informed consent form was provided, detailing the study objectives, the procedures to be followed, the benefits and potential risks, as well as the confidentiality conditions. Participants signed the document before completing the questionnaire. The study was conducted in accordance with the Institutional Research Ethics Committee of César Vallejo University, under approval number RCU No. 0659-2024-UCV, ensuring compliance with the ethical principles established in the Declaration of Helsinki and the applicable national regulations.

No exemption from consent was granted by the ethics committee, as the study’s methodology involved data collection through a questionnaire. It was considered essential to ensure that each participant explicitly and formally provided their consent.

Additionally, participants were guaranteed the right to withdraw at any time without repercussions, and the confidentiality of the provided information was ensured by using coded responses to prevent any possibility of personal identification.