<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.2 20190208//EN" "http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.2/JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" article-type="case-report" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="en">
    <front>
        <journal-meta>
            <journal-id journal-id-type="pmc">F1000Research</journal-id>
            <journal-title-group>
                <journal-title>F1000Research</journal-title>
            </journal-title-group>
            <issn pub-type="epub">2046-1402</issn>
            <publisher>
                <publisher-name>F1000 Research Limited</publisher-name>
                <publisher-loc>London, UK</publisher-loc>
            </publisher>
        </journal-meta>
        <article-meta>
            <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.12688/f1000research.169022.1</article-id>
            <article-categories>
                <subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
                    <subject>Case Report</subject>
                </subj-group>
                <subj-group>
                    <subject>Articles</subject>
                </subj-group>
            </article-categories>
            <title-group>
                <article-title>Case Report: Endoscopy Lithotripsy-Assisted Giant Stone Removal in Common Hepatic Duct during Common Bile Duct Exploration Surgery</article-title>
                <fn-group content-type="pub-status">
                    <fn>
                        <p>[version 1; peer review: 1 not approved]</p>
                    </fn>
                </fn-group>
            </title-group>
            <contrib-group>
                <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
                    <name>
                        <surname>S</surname>
                        <given-names>Alldila Hendy P</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/">Conceptualization</role>
                    <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/">Data Curation</role>
                    <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/">Formal Analysis</role>
                    <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/">Supervision</role>
                    <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/">Writing &#x2013; Review &amp; Editing</role>
                    <uri content-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0499-1422</uri>
                    <xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c1">a</xref>
                    <xref ref-type="aff" rid="a1">1</xref>
                </contrib>
                <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no">
                    <name>
                        <surname>Aby</surname>
                        <given-names>Luthfian</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/">Formal Analysis</role>
                    <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/">Investigation</role>
                    <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/">Methodology</role>
                    <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/">Project Administration</role>
                    <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/">Visualization</role>
                    <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/">Writing &#x2013; Review &amp; Editing</role>
                    <xref ref-type="aff" rid="a2">2</xref>
                </contrib>
                <aff id="a1">
                    <label>1</label>Digestive Division of Surgery Department, University of Indonesia Hospital, Jakarta Pusat, DKI Jakarta, 10430, Indonesia</aff>
                <aff id="a2">
                    <label>2</label>Faculty of Medicine, University of Indonesia, Jakarta Pusat, DKI Jakarta, 10430, Indonesia</aff>
            </contrib-group>
            <author-notes>
                <corresp id="c1">
                    <label>a</label>
                    <email xlink:href="mailto:alldila.hendy@gmail.com">alldila.hendy@gmail.com</email>
                </corresp>
                <fn fn-type="conflict">
                    <p>No competing interests were disclosed.</p>
                </fn>
            </author-notes>
            <pub-date pub-type="epub">
                <day>10</day>
                <month>9</month>
                <year>2025</year>
            </pub-date>
            <pub-date pub-type="collection">
                <year>2025</year>
            </pub-date>
            <volume>14</volume>
            <elocation-id>901</elocation-id>
            <history>
                <date date-type="accepted">
                    <day>30</day>
                    <month>8</month>
                    <year>2025</year>
                </date>
            </history>
            <permissions>
                <copyright-statement>Copyright: &#x00a9; 2025 S AHP and Aby L</copyright-statement>
                <copyright-year>2025</copyright-year>
                <license xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
                    <license-p>This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.</license-p>
                </license>
            </permissions>
            <self-uri content-type="pdf" xlink:href="https://f1000research.com/articles/14-901/pdf"/>
            <abstract>
                <sec>
                    <title>Background</title>
                    <p>The management of giant bile duct stones, especially those impacted in the common hepatic duct, poses substantial clinical challenges. Generally, large stones are managed with methods such as Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) or direct choledochoscopy, which are limited by the size of the stones that can be effectively treated. Endoscopy lithotripsy using ureteroscopy (URS), typically used for kidney stones, shows promise for breaking down these large impacted bile duct stone.</p>
                </sec>
                <sec>
                    <title>Case Report</title>
                    <p>A 60-year-old female presented with intermittent right upper quadrant abdominal pain lasting two months, jaundice appearing three weeks before admission, dark urine, and clay-colored stools. Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) diagnosed her with obstructive jaundice due to multiple giant stones in the common hepatic duct (CHD) and common bile duct (CBD) with distal CBD stenosis. Following a cholecystectomy and CBD exploration&#x2014;which revealed dilation from the common bile duct to the right and left hepatic ducts&#x2014;a choledochotomy was performed. Multiple stones were found in the CBD and a giant, impacted stone in the CHD. Stone removal was achieved using URS lithotripsy, which fragmented the stones, allowing for evacuation. The largest stone measured approximately 4 cm. A side-to-side choledochoduodenostomy bypass was then performed from the CBD to the duodenum. The patient was discharged on post-operative day five in good condition and by day 14 post-operation, no jaundice or significant symptoms.</p>
                </sec>
                <sec>
                    <title>Conclusion</title>
                    <p>This case underscores the benefits of adapting endoscopy lithotripsy for biliary system use, particularly for challenging cases involving impacted giant stones in less accessible locations of the biliary tract.</p>
                </sec>
            </abstract>
            <kwd-group kwd-group-type="author">
                <kwd>Endoscopy lithotripsy</kwd>
                <kwd>Impacted bile duct stone</kwd>
                <kwd>Obstructive jaundice</kwd>
            </kwd-group>
            <funding-group>
                <funding-statement>The author(s) declared that no grants were involved in supporting this work.</funding-statement>
            </funding-group>
        </article-meta>
    </front>
    <body>
        <sec id="sec3">
            <title>Background</title>
            <p>Bile duct stone is a common diagnosis made by digestive surgeons in routine practice. Although usually asymptomatic, bile duct stone can obstruct the biliary tract, leading to symptoms such as jaundice, right-upper quadrant abdominal pain, and changes in urine and stool color. Most cases of biliary tract obstruction occur in the common bile duct (CBD).
                <sup>
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
                </sup> Giant bile duct stone are a rare presentation in cases of gallbladder stones and are defined as stones larger than 5 cm or 50 mm. In cases of impacted giant bile duct stone, standard non-invasive procedures like Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) are not feasible, thus management involves percutaneous approaches or open surgery.
                <sup>
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">2</xref>,
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">3</xref>
                </sup> Lithotripsy, a device that emits sound waves, is commonly used to break up kidney or ureter stones to facilitate their spontaneous expulsion. This device also holds potential for breaking up giant bile duct stone, easing the removal of these stones. This case report aims to document the successful management of an impacted giant bile duct stone using endoscopy-guided ureteroscopy lithotripsy for the visualization and fragmentation of larged impacted stones located higher in the biliary tract.</p>
        </sec>
        <sec id="sec4">
            <title>Case presentation</title>
            <p>A female in her sixties presented with intermittent right upper quadrant abdominal pain over several weeks. Initially, the patient experienced intermittent pain in the upper right abdomen for two months. Jaundiced developed several weeks before admission, symptoms included yellowing of the eyes, dark urine resembling strong tea, and pale clay-colored stools similar to putty, with no occurrence of black stools. Although these symptoms subsided on their own, abdominal pain recurred week ago, accompanied by increased jaundice. The patient reported nausea and vomiting but no fever and began to feel itchiness all over the body. No otrher relevant previous and familial history.</p>
            <p>Upon physical examination, the patient was fully conscious with stable hemodynamic. The sclera was icteric, and the conjunctiva was not anaemic. The abdomen was soft and tender in the upper right quadrant, with a positive Murphy&#x2019;s sign and no guarding. Laboratory tests showed a slight decrease in haemoglobin and haematocrit levels, normal leukocyte count, normal prothrombin time and activated partial thromboplastin time. There was an increase in bilirubin levels, with total bilirubin above 9.0 mg/dL and increased in total direct bilirubin above 7.0 mg/dL. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) revealed dilatation of the common bile duct (CBD) and intrahepatic bile ducts on both sides, along with multiple giant stones in the CBD and common hepatic duct (CHD) (
                <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
Figure 1</xref>). The diagnosis was obstructive jaundice due to multiple giant stones in the common hepatic duct and common bile duct with distal CBD stenosis.</p>
            <fig fig-type="figure" id="f1" orientation="portrait" position="float">
                <label>
Figure 1. </label>
                <caption>
                    <title>MRCP showing dilatation of the CBD and intrahepatic bile ducts on both sides, along with multiple giant stones in the CBD and CHD.</title>
                </caption>
                <graphic id="gr1" orientation="portrait" position="float" xlink:href="https://f1000research-files.f1000.com/manuscripts/186303/2e16ee7e-3bb2-4158-809c-71148b820f61_figure1.gif"/>
            </fig>
            <p>The surgical intervention consisted of CBD exploration and choledochotomy followed by a side-to-side choledochoduodenostomy and cholecystectomy. Intraoperatively, after cholecystectomy, CBD exploration showed dilatation extending to the right and left hepatic ducts. Choledochotomy was performed, revealing multiple stones in the CBD and a large, impacted stone in the CHD. Stone removal was facilitated using guided URS and lithotripsy, breaking the stone into fragments for evacuation (
                <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">Figure 2A</xref> and 
                <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">2B</xref>). The size of the stone was approximately 4 cm (
                <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">Figure 2C</xref>). Proximal probing showed no stones, and distal probing indicated stenosis of the CBD with a probe size of 3 Fr. Proximal bile flow was smooth. A decision was made to perform a side-to-side bypass from the CBD to the duodenum (choledochoduodenostomy). The patient recovered well and was discharged within a week. At follow-up, she remained symptom-free.</p>
            <fig fig-type="figure" id="f2" orientation="portrait" position="float">
                <label>
Figure 2. </label>
                <caption>
                    <title>A) Documentation of the operator conducting endoscopy lithotripsy; B) Endoscopy Lithotripsy using ureteroscopy revealed a giant stone impacted in the CHD; C) Fragmented giant stone.</title>
                </caption>
                <graphic id="gr2" orientation="portrait" position="float" xlink:href="https://f1000research-files.f1000.com/manuscripts/186303/2e16ee7e-3bb2-4158-809c-71148b820f61_figure2.gif"/>
            </fig>
        </sec>
        <sec id="sec5" sec-type="discussion">
            <title>Discussion</title>
            <p>This case report focuses on the use of endoscopy-lithotripsy for impacted giant common hepatic duct and common bile duct stones. The patient presented with typical symptoms of obstructive jaundice, including yellowing of the eyes, dark urine, and pale, clay-colored stools. As the disease progressed, the patient experienced abdominal pain accompanied by increased jaundice. These symptoms are common in cases of obstructive jaundice. It is important to determine whether the jaundice in this patient is prehepatic, intrahepatic, or posthepatic. To differentiate these, bilirubin levels were measured, showing increased total, conjugated, and unconjugated bilirubin levels. An increase in direct bilirubin above 1.0 mg/dL is noted as an anomaly when total bilirubin increases.
                <sup>
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">4</xref>
                </sup> Elevated conjugated bilirubin levels indicate obstructive jaundice primarily caused by cholestasis and hepatocellular dysfunction.
                <sup>
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">5</xref>
                </sup> The increase in unconjugated bilirubin in this patient might be due to the high total bilirubin already accumulated in the body, thus also raising the unconjugated bilirubin, although this increase is not as significant as that of conjugated bilirubin.</p>
            <p>MRCP for this patient revealed multiple giant stones in the CBD and CHD. The occurrence of giant bile duct stone, defined as stones larger than 5 cm, is rare and associated with higher complication rates and technical difficulties in surgical management.
                <sup>
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">2</xref>
                </sup> The main management modality for bile duct obstruction due to bile duct stone is Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). However, the ERCP technique is known to have a low success rate for stones larger than 10 mm and is therefore not feasible for giant bile duct stone cases.
                <sup>
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">3</xref>
                </sup> The standard management for these bile duct stone is open surgery with CBD exploration, although there are some case reports of laparoscopic procedures for giant bile duct stone.
                <sup>
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">6</xref>,
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref7">7</xref>
                </sup> In this case, the patient was decided to undergo open surgery with common bile duct exploration, choledocostomy, and cholecystectomy due to the presence of multiple bile duct stone involving many bile ducts. Additionally, open surgery was chosen due to the location of the impacted giant bile duct stone being higher than the bile duct which was in the CHD.</p>
            <p>A highlight in this case report is the use of lithotripsy, which can break down giant bile duct stone with the aid of endoscopy ureteroscopy in patients undergoing open surgery. Lithotripsy is a fragmentation technique using sound waves typically used to break up kidney and ureter stones. The use of lithotripsy for breaking bile duct stone has been reported by this case report and other previous reports. Wang, et al. reported the use of Fluoroscopy-guided percutaneous lithotripsy using a FREDDY laser in patients with giant bile duct stone and reported a 100% success rate for bile duct stone clearance with a residual stone rate of 18.8% of cases.
                <sup>
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref8">8</xref>
                </sup> Endoscopic lithotripsy has also been reported by Khalil, et al. in patients undergoing percutaneous cholecystectomy. In this case report, Khalil, et al. used a pediatric video gastroscope for direct visualization of the gallbladder before applying electrohydraulic lithotripsy. The management was deemed successful in breaking the bile duct stone into small fragments that were drained using a catheter.
                <sup>
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9">9</xref>
                </sup> In this case report, lithotripsy was performed using ureteroscopy. There are previous case reports that also used a ureteroscope to break giant bile duct stone with lithotripsy. Loffeld, et al. used ureteroscopy lithotripsy to visualize and break bile duct stone using a percutaneous approach.
                <sup>
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10">10</xref>
                </sup>
            </p>
            <p>Based on literature review, previous case reports tended to use a percutaneous approach in performing lithotripsy because in those cases, the giant bile duct stone occurred at only one location. This case report is the first to apply ureteroscopy lithotripsy in patients undergoing open CBD exploration surgery where open surgery was chosen because the impacted bile duct occurred above the biliary tract. In normal cases, a higher incision is required to reach the location of the impacted giant bile duct stone, but in this case, by using endoscopic ureteroscopy visualization and lithotripsy to break the bile duct stone, the incision made in the patient could be reduced to only the CBD. The patient in this case report underwent overall stone removal management with good follow-up results and no complaints up to 14 days after surgery.</p>
        </sec>
        <sec id="sec6" sec-type="conclusion">
            <title>Conclusion</title>
            <p>This case underscores the benefits of adapting endoscopy lithotripsy for biliary system use, particularly for challenging cases involving impacted giant stones in less accessible locations of the biliary tract. This technique reduced the necessity for large surgical incisions to reach the giant impacted bile duct stone in the common hepatic duct by fragmenting the stone. This case provides a new direction for future cases involving impacted bile duct stone in less accessible place.</p>
        </sec>
        <sec id="sec7">
            <title>Consent to publish</title>
            <p>Written informed consent for publication of clinical details and images was obtained from the patient. The patient has reviewed the manuscript and agreed to the publication of anonymized information.</p>
        </sec>
    </body>
    <back>
        <sec id="sec10" sec-type="data-availability">
            <title>Data availability</title>
            <p>The CARE checklist supporting this case report is available in Zenodo at DOI: 
                <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16913005">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16913005</ext-link>.
                <sup>
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">11</xref>
                </sup> All other clinical data supporting the findings of this case report are included in the article and have been anonymized to protect patient privacy.</p>
            <p>Data are available under the terms of the 
                <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.en">Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license</ext-link> (CC-BY 4.0).</p>
        </sec>
        <ref-list>
            <title>References</title>
            <ref id="ref1">
                <label>1</label>
                <mixed-citation publication-type="other">
                    <person-group person-group-type="author">

                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>Coucke</surname>
                            <given-names>EM</given-names>
                        </name>

                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>Akbar</surname>
                            <given-names>H</given-names>
                        </name>

                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>Kahloon</surname>
                            <given-names>A</given-names>
                        </name>

                        <etal/>
</person-group>:
                    <source>

                        <italic toggle="yes">Biliary Obstruction.</italic>
</source>
                    <publisher-loc>Treasure Island (FL)</publisher-loc>:<year>2024</year>.</mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref2">
                <label>2</label>
                <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
                    <person-group person-group-type="author">

                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>Al Zoubi</surname>
                            <given-names>M</given-names>
                        </name>

                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>El Ansari</surname>
                            <given-names>W</given-names>
                        </name>

                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>Al Moudaris</surname>
                            <given-names>AA</given-names>
                        </name>

                        <etal/>
</person-group>:
                    <article-title>Largest case series of giant gallstones ever reported, and review of the literature.</article-title>
                    <source>

                        <italic toggle="yes">Int. J. Surg. Case Rep.</italic>
</source>
                    <year>2020</year>;<volume>72</volume>:<fpage>454</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>459</lpage>.
                    <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32698264</pub-id>
                    <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ijscr.2020.06.001</pub-id>
                    <pub-id pub-id-type="pmcid">PMC7322177</pub-id>
                </mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref3">
                <label>3</label>
                <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
                    <person-group person-group-type="author">

                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>Bektas</surname>
                            <given-names>H</given-names>
                        </name>

                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>Duzkoylu</surname>
                            <given-names>Y</given-names>
                        </name>

                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>Cakar</surname>
                            <given-names>E</given-names>
                        </name>

                        <etal/>
</person-group>:
                    <article-title>Giant choledochal calculosis: surgical treatment.</article-title>
                    <source>

                        <italic toggle="yes">N. Am. J. Med. Sci.</italic>
</source>
                    <year>2014</year>;<volume>6</volume>:<fpage>536</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>539</lpage>.
                    <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25489567</pub-id>
                    <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4103/1947-2714.143286</pub-id>
                    <pub-id pub-id-type="pmcid">PMC4215492</pub-id>
                </mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref4">
                <label>4</label>
                <mixed-citation publication-type="other">
                    <person-group person-group-type="author">

                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>Nishant Tripathi</surname>
                            <given-names>IJ</given-names>
                        </name>
</person-group>:
                    <chapter-title>Conjugated Hyperbilirubinemia.</chapter-title>
                    <source>

                        <italic toggle="yes">StatPearls.</italic>
</source>
                    <year>2022</year>.</mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref5">
                <label>5</label>
                <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
                    <person-group person-group-type="author">

                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>Harb</surname>
                            <given-names>R</given-names>
                        </name>

                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>Thomas</surname>
                            <given-names>DW</given-names>
                        </name>
</person-group>:
                    <article-title>Conjugated hyperbilirubinemia: screening and treatment in older infants and children.</article-title>
                    <source>

                        <italic toggle="yes">Pediatr. Rev.</italic>
</source>
                    <year>2007 Mar</year>;<volume>28</volume>(<issue>3</issue>):<fpage>83</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>91</lpage>.
                    <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1542/pir.28.3.83</pub-id>
                </mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref6">
                <label>6</label>
                <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
                    <person-group person-group-type="author">

                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>Dalal</surname>
                            <given-names>S</given-names>
                        </name>

                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>Pankaj</surname>
                        </name>

                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>Bhoriwal</surname>
                            <given-names>S</given-names>
                        </name>

                        <etal/>
</person-group>:
                    <article-title>Giant Gallstone: A Rare Indication of Open Cholecystectomy.</article-title>
                    <source>

                        <italic toggle="yes">JCR.</italic>
</source>
                    <year>2014</year>;<volume>4</volume>:<fpage>17</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>19</lpage>.
                    <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.17659/01.2014.0005</pub-id>
                </mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref7">
                <label>7</label>
                <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
                    <person-group person-group-type="author">

                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>Igwe</surname>
                            <given-names>PO</given-names>
                        </name>

                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>Diri</surname>
                            <given-names>ON</given-names>
                        </name>
</person-group>:
                    <article-title>Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for giant gall stone: Report of two cases.</article-title>
                    <source>

                        <italic toggle="yes">Int. J. Surg. Case Rep.</italic>
</source>
                    <year>2020</year>;<volume>67</volume>:<fpage>207</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>210</lpage>. Netherlands.</mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref8">
                <label>8</label>
                <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
                    <person-group person-group-type="author">

                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>Wang</surname>
                            <given-names>W</given-names>
                        </name>

                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>Wang</surname>
                            <given-names>W</given-names>
                        </name>

                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>Liu</surname>
                            <given-names>B</given-names>
                        </name>

                        <etal/>
</person-group>:
                    <article-title>Fluoroscopy-guided percutaneous lithotripsy using FREDDY laser for giant gallstones: Preliminary experience.</article-title>
                    <source>

                        <italic toggle="yes">Lasers Surg. Med.</italic>
</source>
                    <year>2022</year>;<volume>54</volume>:<fpage>392</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>398</lpage>.
                    <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">34463963</pub-id>
                    <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/lsm.23477</pub-id>
                </mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref9">
                <label>9</label>
                <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
                    <person-group person-group-type="author">

                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>Aloreidi</surname>
                            <given-names>K</given-names>
                        </name>

                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>Atiq</surname>
                            <given-names>M</given-names>
                        </name>

                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>Yeager</surname>
                            <given-names>T</given-names>
                        </name>

                        <etal/>
</person-group>:
                    <article-title>Lithotripsy and Extraction of Gallbladder Stones Through Cholecystostomy Using Direct Visualization Technique - a Novel Procedure for Patients Who Are Not a Surgical Candidate: 1302.</article-title>
                    <source>

                        <italic toggle="yes">Off. J. Am. Coll. Gastroenterol.|ACG.</italic>
</source>
                    <year>2016</year>;<volume>111</volume>:<fpage>S581</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>S583</lpage>.
                    <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.14309/00000434-201610001-01302</pub-id>
                    <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://journals.lww.com/ajg/fulltext/2016/10001/lithotripsy_and_extraction_of_gallbladder_stones.1302.aspx">Reference Source</ext-link>
                </mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref10">
                <label>10</label>
                <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
                    <person-group person-group-type="author">

                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>Loffeld</surname>
                            <given-names>RJLF</given-names>
                        </name>

                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>Paulus</surname>
                            <given-names>J</given-names>
                        </name>

                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>Langbein</surname>
                            <given-names>S</given-names>
                        </name>

                        <etal/>
</person-group>:
                    <article-title>Removal of Common Bile Ducts Stones via Percutaneous Access with a Flexible Ureteroscope and Laser Assistance.</article-title>
                    <source>

                        <italic toggle="yes">Case Rep. Gastrointest. Med.</italic>
</source>
                    <year>2019</year>;<volume>2019</volume>:<fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>3</lpage>.
                    <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1155/2019/4684631</pub-id>
                </mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref11">
                <label>11</label>
                <mixed-citation publication-type="other">
                    <person-group person-group-type="author">

                        <name name-style="western">
                            <surname>Hendy</surname>
                            <given-names>A</given-names>
                        </name>
</person-group>:
                    <article-title>CARE CHECKLIST Endoscopy lithotripsy for CBD stone.</article-title>
                    <source>

                        <italic toggle="yes">Zenodo.</italic>
</source>
                    <year>2025</year>.
                    <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5281/zenodo.16913005</pub-id>
                </mixed-citation>
            </ref>
        </ref-list>
    </back>
    <sub-article article-type="reviewer-report" id="report431718">
        <front-stub>
            <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5256/f1000research.186303.r431718</article-id>
            <title-group>
                <article-title>Reviewer response for version 1</article-title>
            </title-group>
            <contrib-group>
                <contrib contrib-type="author">
                    <name>
                        <surname>Ge</surname>
                        <given-names>Tianjia Jessie</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <xref ref-type="aff" rid="r431718a1">1</xref>
                    <role>Referee</role>
                    <uri content-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3618-3051</uri>
                </contrib>
                <aff id="r431718a1">
                    <label>1</label>Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA</aff>
            </contrib-group>
            <author-notes>
                <fn fn-type="conflict">
                    <p>
                        <bold>Competing interests: </bold>No competing interests were disclosed.</p>
                </fn>
            </author-notes>
            <pub-date pub-type="epub">
                <day>25</day>
                <month>11</month>
                <year>2025</year>
            </pub-date>
            <permissions>
                <copyright-statement>Copyright: &#x00a9; 2025 Ge TJ</copyright-statement>
                <copyright-year>2025</copyright-year>
                <license xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
                    <license-p>This is an open access peer review report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.</license-p>
                </license>
            </permissions>
            <related-article ext-link-type="doi" id="relatedArticleReport431718" related-article-type="peer-reviewed-article" xlink:href="10.12688/f1000research.169022.1"/>
            <custom-meta-group>
                <custom-meta>
                    <meta-name>recommendation</meta-name>
                    <meta-value>reject</meta-value>
                </custom-meta>
            </custom-meta-group>
        </front-stub>
        <body>
            <p>The authors present a case report of a giant (4 cm) gallstone in the common hepatic duct treated with a combination of open surgery and endoscopic lithotripsy. The report provides a broad overview of the patient&#x2019;s presentation and clinical course; however, additional procedural and contextual details are needed to fully understand the benefit of the selected management.&#x00a0;</p>
            <p> </p>
            <p> 
                <bold>Case history and progression, and diagnostic tests/treatment:</bold>
            </p>
            <p> Important aspects of the operative technique are insufficiently described. In particular: 
                <list list-type="order">
                    <list-item>
                        <p>
                            <bold>Ureteroscopy and lithotripsy technique</bold>: The case does not specify whether a semirigid or flexible ureteroscope was used. Figure 2 appears to depict a semirigid scope, but it is unclear whether the choledochotomy afforded adequate access to the common hepatic duct or whether a flexible scope would have been required to reach the stone. The lithotripter model, energy settings, probe type, and total fragmentation time are also absent. While the text suggests ultrasonic lithotripsy, laser lithotripsy has been described in the biliary tract and should be acknowledged for context.</p>
                    </list-item>
                    <list-item>
                        <p>
                            <bold>Stone extraction details</bold>: It is unclear whether stone fragments were removed with baskets, graspers, or flushed out, and how fragment clearance was verified (cholangiography or other post-operative imaging).</p>
                    </list-item>
                    <list-item>
                        <p>
                            <bold>Operative steps and incision approach</bold>: Although the authors suggest that ureteroscopy reduced the need for a large incision, the procedure still appeared to involve open exploration. The manuscript should clearly describe the operative approach and how it deviated from a standard open common hepatic duct exploration to substantiate this claim.</p>
                    </list-item>
                    <list-item>
                        <p>
                            <bold>Stone composition</bold>: The composition of the gallstone was not reported. The density and composition of the stone in urologic cases (e.g. calcium oxalate versus uric acid) affects the efficiency of lithotripsy, and a brief review of how gallstone composition (cholesterol vs pigment-based) may affect lithotripsy efficacy would be important for readers.</p>
                    </list-item>
                    <list-item>
                        <p>
                            <bold>Stone size</bold>: The size of the stone was estimated to be 4 cm based on the collected fragments in Figure 2, however three-dimensional measurement on MRCP of the stone and degree of ductal dilation would be helpful, especially as the authors refer to this as a giant bile duct stone but also state that the definition of such is &gt; 5 cm in diameter.</p>
                    </list-item>
                </list> These omissions limit the utility of the report for clinicians who may consider employing similar techniques.</p>
            <p> </p>
            <p> 
                <bold>Discussion of findings:</bold>
            </p>
            <p> The discussion highlights the potential utility of ureteroscopy and lithotripsy in managing biliary stones, but several important conceptual issues are not addressed: 
                <list list-type="order">
                    <list-item>
                        <p>Alternative management strategies: The authors should discuss in further detail how a common hepatic duct stone of this size would traditionally be managed, and what advantages ureteroscopic lithotripsy offers in this context, especially given that an open operation was performed regardless. The manuscript would also benefit from a short discussion of the specific limitations of ERCP for larger stones (e.g. efficacy of fragmentation, difficulties with fragment extraction, lengthy procedure duration).</p>
                    </list-item>
                    <list-item>
                        <p>Risks specific to applying ureteroscopic equipment in the biliary system: Potential injuries to the bile duct or surrounding tissue should be discussed, as well as thermal or mechanical risks from the lithotripter.</p>
                    </list-item>
                    <list-item>
                        <p>Novelty and comparison with existing literature: The report would benefit from citing prior cases of endoscopic or ureteroscopic management of bile duct stones&#x2014;such as Dou et al. (2002, PMID: 11868015), Othman et al. (2010, PMID: 20177943), and Dobrucali et al. (2000, PMID: 11164136)&#x2014;and clarifying what differentiates the current case (e.g., stone size, location in the common hepatic duct rather than the common bile duct, intraoperative approach).</p>
                    </list-item>
                </list> Expanding these areas would significantly improve the educational value of the manuscript.</p>
            <p> </p>
            <p> Overall this is an interesting report of a giant gallstone in the common hepatic duct and the use of ureteroscopic lithotripsy to assist in its management. For the case to be more instructive to practitioners, the authors should include more detailed technical parameters of the procedure and a description of how this purportedly reduced operative morbidity given that an open exploration was still performed, and finally consideration of safety concerns and potential complications inherent in adapting a urologic device to a hepatobiliary context. Minor grammatical edits and clarification of several sentences would also help improve clarity. (e.g. endoscopic lithotripsy instead of endoscopy lithotripsy; incomplete sentence and typo in &#x201c;No other relevant previous and familial history.&#x201d;)</p>
            <p>Are enough details provided of any physical examination and diagnostic tests, treatment given and outcomes?</p>
            <p>Partly</p>
            <p>Is the case presented with sufficient detail to be useful for other practitioners?</p>
            <p>No</p>
            <p>Is sufficient discussion included of the importance of the findings and their relevance to future understanding of disease processes, diagnosis or treatment?</p>
            <p>No</p>
            <p>Is the background of the case&#x2019;s history and progression described in sufficient detail?</p>
            <p>Yes</p>
            <p>Reviewer Expertise:</p>
            <p>Urolithiasis, surgical management of urolithiasis including ureteroscopy and methods of fragment retrieval</p>
            <p>I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to state that I do not consider it to be of an acceptable scientific standard, for reasons outlined above.</p>
        </body>
        <back>
            <ref-list>
                <title>References</title>
                <ref id="rep-ref-431718-1">
                    <label>1</label>
                    <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
                        <person-group person-group-type="author"/>:
                        <article-title>Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration using a rigid nephroscope</article-title>.
                        <source>
                            <italic>British Journal of Surgery</italic>
                        </source>.<year>2009</year>;<volume>96</volume>(<issue>4</issue>) :
                        <elocation-id>10.1002/bjs.6579</elocation-id>
                        <fpage>412</fpage>-<lpage>416</lpage>
                        <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/bjs.6579</pub-id>
                    </mixed-citation>
                </ref>
                <ref id="rep-ref-431718-2">
                    <label>2</label>
                    <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
                        <person-group person-group-type="author"/>:
                        <article-title>Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration and holmium laser lithotripsy: a novel approach to the management of common bile duct stones</article-title>.
                        <source>
                            <italic>Surgical Endoscopy</italic>
                        </source>.<year>2010</year>;<volume>24</volume>(<issue>7</issue>) :
                        <elocation-id>10.1007/s00464-009-0837-0</elocation-id>
                        <fpage>1759</fpage>-<lpage>1764</lpage>
                        <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00464-009-0837-0</pub-id>
                    </mixed-citation>
                </ref>
                <ref id="rep-ref-431718-3">
                    <label>3</label>
                    <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
                        <person-group person-group-type="author"/>:
                        <article-title>Contemporary &#x201c;urologic&#x201d; intervention in the pancreaticobiliary tree</article-title>.
                        <source>
                            <italic>Urology</italic>
                        </source>.<year>2001</year>;<volume>57</volume>(<issue>1</issue>) :
                        <elocation-id>10.1016/S0090-4295(00)00888-8</elocation-id>
                        <fpage>21</fpage>-<lpage>25</lpage>
                        <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0090-4295(00)00888-8</pub-id>
                    </mixed-citation>
                </ref>
            </ref-list>
        </back>
    </sub-article>
</article>
