Archaeal viruses represent one of the least studied parts of the virosphere. Furthermore, the vast morphological and genetic diversity observed in the known archaeal viruses ( Krupovic et al. 2018) suggests that novel viruses await discovery. Hypersaline environments around the world have served as rich sources for isolating archaeal viruses ( Atanasova et al. 2012, 2015; Mizuno et al. 2019). So far, the majority of isolated halophilic archaeal viruses display tailed virus particles, while other virus morphotypes, such as pleomorphic, are currently represented by less isolates ( Atanasova et al. 2016; Demina and Oksanen 2020). Although originally found in hypersaline environments, pleomorphic archaeal viruses seem to be more widespread than first thought ( Medvedeva et al. 2023; Baquero et al. 2024). Currently (as of April 2026), three families within the realm Pleomoviria comprise pleomorphic archaeal viruses: Pleolipoviridae ( Liu et al. 2022) , Thalassapleoviridae ( Baquero et al. 2024; Varsani et al. 2025), and Nanopleoviridae ( Zhou et al. 2025), which include viruses associated with archaea within the classes Halobacteria and Archaeoglobi as well as the phylum Nanohaloarchaeota, respectively.

The family Pleolipoviridae includes three genera: Alpha-, Beta-, and Gammapleolipoviridae ( Liu et al. 2022). In addition, the Delta- and Epsilon- genera were proposed ( Alarcón-Schumacher et al. 2023). The currently ratified members of the family Pleolipoviridae demonstrate narrow host ranges within the class Halobacteria ( Liu et al. 2022), where they establish persistent, non-lytic infections and are thought to exit host cells via budding ( Pietilä et al. 2012; Svirskaitė et al. 2016; Alarcón-Schumacher et al. 2022), while some pleolipoviruses are temperate ( Liu et al. 2015; Wang et al. 2018; Atanasova et al. 2018; Dyall-Smith et al. 2021; Alarcón-Schumacher et al. 2023). Proviral regions and plasmids related to pleolipoviruses are widely found in archaea, suggesting their long-standing evolutionary relationships as well as the global abundance of these viruses and related mobile genetic elements ( Sencilo et al. 2012; Liu et al. 2015; Atanasova et al. 2018; Alarcón-Schumacher et al. 2023).

Pleolipoviral particles are pleomorphic membrane vesicles (typically 40–70 nm in diameter) which consist of two major proteins: a spike protein and an internal membrane protein, each of which can occur in one or two types ( Pietilä et al. 2012; El Omari et al. 2019). Interestingly, the relatively short genomes (7–17 nt or bp) vary in structure across the known isolates, and may be circular single-stranded (ss) DNA, circular double-stranded (ds) DNA (also with ss interruptions), or linear ds DNA molecules ( Pietilä et al. 2009; Roine et al. 2010; Sencilo et al. 2012). Overall nucleotide similarity between the genomes of pleolipoviruses is relatively low, but a cluster of typically five open reading frames (ORFs) are more conserved, including the gene encoding the spike protein (the VP4-like fusogen), which serves as the hallmark gene of this viral group ( Pietilä et al. 2012; Sencilo et al. 2012; El Omari et al. 2019; Alarcón-Schumacher et al. 2023).

Halorubrum pleomorphic virus 8 (HRPV-8) was isolated from an environmental sample collected at a solar saltern in Samut Sakhon, Thailand ( Atanasova et al. 2015). HRPV-8 produced turbid plaques on two Halorubrum strains originating from the same location. Although HRPV-8 was not sensitive to chloroform, transmission electron microscopy and the protein profile of the purified virions indicated that it is a pleomorphic virus ( Atanasova et al. 2015). Here, we present the complete genome sequence of HRPV-8 and suggest its classification within the genus Alphapleolipovirus of the family Pleolipoviridae.

Raw data included 6,754,300 read pairs, which were trimmed to 6,183,469 read pairs. From trimmed reads, 461 contigs were assembled (min = 56 bp, max = 486,959 bp, N50 = 123,392 bp). From these contigs, only two were identified as viral by geNomad: one unclassified provirus (37,872 bp) and one virus assigned to the family Pleolipoviridae (10,879 bp). The latter one displayed terminal 55-bp-long repeats, which reflected the assembly artifact from a circular template, since the used k-mer was 55. The artificial nature of the repeat was confirmed by rerunning SPAdes with the k-mer size of 77 which produced the 10,901-bp-long pleolipoviral contig with different terminal repeats of 77 bp. Thus, one of the repeats was removed, resulting in a 10,824-bp-long circular sequence, which represents the complete genome sequence of HRPV-8. Its GC content is 63.2%.

Whole-genome searches against the NCBI core_nt database retrieved the best two hits to the Halorubrum pleomorphic viruses 2 and 6 (HRPV-2: 97% coverage, 95% nt identity; HRPV-6: 78% coverage, 96% nt identity) as well as multiple hits to the sequences of halophilic archaea and other pleolipoviruses, albeit with significantly lower coverage (≤37%) ( Table 1). The ANI values between HRPV-8 versus HRPV-2 and HRPV-8 versus HRPV-6 were 95.6% and 91.5%, respectively. For comparison, the ANI between HRPV-2 and HRPV-6 is 94.7%. Searching against the IMG/VR v. 4 database with the HRPV-8 whole genome as a query retrieved hits only to HRPV-2 and HRPV-6. The VIRIDIC analysis of intergenomic similarities between HRPV-8, HRPV-2, HRPV-6 and other current members of the Alphapleolipovirus genus suggested that HRPV-8 is a separate species ( Figure 1).

HRPV-8 genome annotation with Phold resulted in 12 predicted ORFs, most of which encoded gene products of unknown functions ( Table 2). Consistent with the observed ANI values, seven proteins were (almost) identical (99–100% amino acid identity) in HRPV-8 and HRPV-2 ( Table 2, Figure 1). Three of these were also 99–100% identical to their counterparts in HRVP-6. Based on the Phold prediction, Conserved Domain search, as well as similarities to other pleolipoviruses, gp1 was annotated as a putative DNA replication initiation protein in HRPV-8. gp2 was predicted as a single-stranded DNA binding protein by Phold. gp3 was predicted to be an internal membrane protein, as it was similar to such proteins in other pleolipoviruses. HHPred searches and observed similarities to counterparts in HRPV-2 and HRPV-6 suggested that gp4 was a spike protein (VP4-like). gp5 was annotated as an ATPase based on the Phold prediction, HHPred and Conserved Domain searches, as well as similarities to other pleolipoviruses. gp12 had multiple hits to antitoxin and DNA-binding proteins in HHPred searches, while Conserved Domain search against the COG database recruited a hit to DNA gyrase/topoisomerase IV, subunit A (Replication, recombination and repair, COG0188).

HRPV-8 genome sequence is highly similar to those of the viruses HRPV-2 and HRPV-6, which are currently classified within the Alphapleolipovirus genus of the Pleolipoviridae family as the species of Alphapleolipovirus thailandense and Alphapleolipovirus samutsakhonense, respectively. While a few proteins were (almost) identical in HRPV-8, HRPV-2, and HRPV-6, the VP4-like spike proteins (a hallmark of pleomorphic archaeal viruses) share only 55–63% amino acid identities in these three viruses. The VIRIDIC-based comparisons of alphapleolipoviruses suggest that HRPV-8 is a separate species. Based on the observed similarities, we propose to classify HRPV-8 as a new member of the Alphapleolipovirus genus. The HRPV-8 sequence presented here contributes to resolving the genetic diversity of pleomorphic archaeal viruses, highlighting the mosaicisms of their genomes.