F1000Research F1000Research 2046-1402 F1000 Research Limited London, UK 10.12688/f1000research.175982.1 Systematic Review Articles Neuroplasticity and University Education: Impact of Pedagogical Strategies on Learning Outcomes—A Systematic Review

[version 1; peer review: 1 approved with reservations]

 Barturen Mondragón Eliana Maritza Conceptualization Investigation https://orcid.org/0009-0003-6822-2857 a 1 Cabrera Cabrera Xiomara Conceptualization Investigation Writing – Original Draft Preparation 1 Pisfil-Benites Nilthon Methodology Validation Visualization Writing – Original Draft Preparation 2 Perez Perez César Alberto Data Curation Supervision Writing – Original Draft Preparation 3 Lambayeque, Universidad Señor de Sipan, Chiclayo, Lambayeque, 051, Peru lima, Universidad Tecnologica del Peru, Lima District, Lima Region, Peru lima, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima District, Lima Region, Peru barturenm@USS.EDU.PE

No competing interests were disclosed.

 5 5 2026 2026 15 671 12 3 2026 Copyright: © 2026 Barturen Mondragón EM et al. 2026 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

This study analyzes the impact of pedagogical strategies based on neuroplasticity on academic performance and long-term knowledge retention in university students, compared to traditional teaching methods. Neuroplasticity, understood as the brain's ability to reorganize and adapt to new learning, represents an innovative approach in higher education. In this sense, it emphasizes the importance of teacher training to implement pedagogical practices that take advantage of this principle, promoting active and personalized learning. To this end, a systematic literature review (SLR) was conducted using the PICO methodology, analyzing 54 relevant scientific documents. The findings show that strategies based on neuroplasticity, such as gamification, experiential learning, and the use of advanced technology, promote greater student engagement, strengthen the consolidation of knowledge, and promote the development of soft skills. However, challenges in their implementation were identified, such as the However, challenges in their implementation were identified, such as the lack of teacher training and institutional resistance to change. It is concluded that these strategies represent an effective pedagogical alternative, with the potential to optimize the teaching-learning process in the university setting.

 neuroplasticity education university pedagogical strategies academic performance. The author(s) declared that no grants were involved in supporting this work. Summary Background

Neuroplasticity, defined as the brain’s capacity to reorganize neural networks in response to experience, has gained increasing relevance in higher education. Pedagogical strategies grounded in neuroplastic principles have been proposed as alternatives to traditional teaching methods; however, their educational impact remains methodologically heterogeneous.

 Objective

To systematically synthesize the scientific evidence on the impact of neuroplasticity-based pedagogical strategies on academic performance, long-term knowledge retention, motivation, and soft skills development in university students.

 Methods

A systematic literature review was conducted following PRISMA 2020 guidelines. The PICO framework was used to formulate the research question. An exhaustive search was performed in Scopus on November 25, 2024, using the search equation: TITLE-ABS (“neuroplasticity” AND “students” OR “neuroscience”) with filters for open-access journal articles published between 2020 and 2024 in English or Spanish. Studies outside neuroscience, arts, and multidisciplinary areas were excluded. From 838 records initially identified, 54 studies met the inclusion criteria after screening and eligibility assessment. Data were synthesized through qualitative thematic analysis.

 Results

Evidence suggests that neuroplasticity-based strategies—such as gamification, experiential learning, immersive technologies, and collaborative approaches—are associated with improved academic performance, enhanced long-term retention, increased student engagement, and strengthened soft skills. However, institutional resistance, limited teacher training, methodological variability, and restricted technological resources were identified as key implementation barriers.

 Limitations

The heterogeneity of study designs, variability in outcome measurement, and restriction to a single database may limit generalizability.

 Conclusions

Neuroplasticity-based pedagogical strategies represent a promising educational innovation in higher education. Their sustainable implementation requires institutional support, teacher training in applied neuroscience, and the development of standardized evaluation frameworks.

Registration

The review protocol was not prospectively registered.

 Introduction Foundations of neuroplasticity

The human brain develops from the embryo to preschool age, with critical stages that include the formation and tuning of neural networks, then regional maturation that allows the development of sensory, language and higher cognitive functions ( Foster & Lopez, 2022). It has an incredible ability to adapt and renew itself known as neuroplasticity that allows learning, loving, thinking, creating and experiencing emotions, as well as innovating, adapting and developing. However, there is little awareness that these capabilities can be improved and learning can be enhanced with practical methods ( Díaz Rodríguez, 2024).

Neuroplasticity is the ability of developing brains and adults to respond and adjust to different coexisting levels, the ability of the nervous system to form new neuronal connections in response to information from the digital environment, affecting learning and the development of skills and competencies. It sustains cognition and functions such as thought, memory, learning, language, perception, emotion and attention, allowing human adaptation to a changing environment ( Nájera González et al., 2021). This ability allows the brain to reorganize and modify its neuronal connections ( Dietsch et al., 2023).

 Impact on learning and cognitive development

The brain adapts to strenuous cognitive challenges. Interpreters and translators who require high cognitive control are ideal models for studying neuroplasticity ( Korenar et al., 2023). The coupling between brains, essential for social communication, shows inter-brain plasticity that persists after social interaction and facilitates social closeness. Transcranial direct current stimulation modulates cortical excitability and promotes neuroplasticity, especially in the motor cortex ( Gellner et al., 2024).

Neuroplasticity is maximum during development and decreases in adulthood, most notably in the sensory cortices, while the motor and prefrontal cortices maintain plasticity for life ( Sarı & Lunghi, 2023). This plasticity can be beneficial as detrimental and improved therapeutically ( Chen et al., 2023). Evidence of sleep-dependent changes in microstructural neuroplasticity is scarce, although it is related to the reorganization of functional networks by learning.

 Applications in higher education

Neuroscience, neuroplasticity and higher nerve functions contribute to pedagogical practices and promote more meaningful learning for students ( Costa, 2023). Habits influence learning and memorization, and to optimize them, performance must be improved, reviewing factors such as diet, sleep and sustained attention ( Rodrigues and Carvalho, 2023). Neurodevelopment is based on plasticity of the nervous system, a biological and dynamic capacity of the CNS to adapt structurally and functionally. The brain, through plasticity, responds to stimuli by adapting, but this capacity decreases with age; however, an increase in prefrontal activation has been observed, suggesting an adaptive brain that uses compensatory scaffolding to face deterioration ( Hill et al., 2023).

Among the contributions of neuroscience we have: neurophysiological effects of robotic verticalization training in patients with a state of minimal consciousness, comparing a group with traditional treatment and another with the robotic device Erigo ( Hanson et al., 2023). Studies of the implications of neuroplasticity in educational neuroscience highlight the responsibility of the student when it comes to connecting socially, so that they are aware to improve their executive functions, and the role of the social environment for their self-regulation ( Choudhury and Wannyn, 2022)

 Methods

A systematic literature review (SRL) was developed, applying the PICO methodology (Population, Intervention, Comparison, Results) to formulate the research question in a structured and precise manner. Table 1

Elements of the PICO methodology.
PICO element Description
Population (P) University students involved in pedagogical strategies based on neuroplasticity.
Intervention (I) Application of pedagogical strategies based on neuroplasticity.
Comparison (C) Traditional teaching methods used in university students.
Results (O) Impact on academic performance and long-term knowledge retention.

Source: Methodology developed by the authors.

As a result of applying the PICO methodology, the following research question was proposed: How do pedagogical strategies based on neuroplasticity impact academic performance and long-term knowledge retention of university students, compared to traditional teaching methods? Other research questions were: What are the main challenges in implementing pedagogical strategies based on neuroplasticity in university environments? In what way do strategies based on neuroplasticity influence student motivation and commitment compared to traditional methods? What impact do strategies based on neuroplasticity have on the development of soft skills of university students?

Procedure

On November 25, 2024, an exhaustive search was conducted in the indexed database Scopus ( https://www.scopus.com), due to its wide multidisciplinary coverage in areas such as neuroscience, education and pedagogy. The search strategy was based on key terms: neuroplasticity, students and neuroscience. The following search equation was used: TITLE-ABS (“neuroplasticity” AND “students” OR “neuroscience”) AND PUBYEAR > 2019 AND PUBYEAR < 2025 AND (LIMIT-TO (OA, “all”)) AND (LIMIT-TO (SUBJAREA, “NEUR”) OR LIMIT-TO (SUBJAREA, “ARTS”) OR LIMIT-TO (SUBJAREA, “MULT”)) AND (LIMIT-TO (LANGUAGE, “English”) OR LIMIT-TO (LANGUAGE, ") Spanish”). Table 2.

Inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Inclusion criteria Exclusion criteria
Empirical research on pedagogical strategies based on neuroplasticity. Records excluded due to lack of full access (open access).
Studies on neuroscience, arts and multidisciplinary areas. Publications outside the publication period (2020-2024).
Studies in languages other than English or Spanish.

Source: Criteria defined by the authors.

In the initial selection process, 838 records were identified. Of these, 557 were excluded because they did not meet the periodicity criterion (2020-2024), leaving a total of 281 eligible records. Subsequently, 20 additional records were eliminated because they were not in the selected languages (English or Spanish), leaving 261 records for evaluation. Finally, the remaining records were reviewed to verify access and 207 records were eliminated due to lack of free access to the full text, which left 54 studies that met the inclusion criteria and were considered for qualitative and quantitative analysis.

Source: PRISMA flow prepared by the authors. Results

Table 3 shows that research in neuroscience has shown that neuroplasticity is key in the acquisition and consolidation of knowledge. Pedagogical strategies based on neuroplasticity emerge as innovative alternatives to traditional methods, optimizing academic performance and favoring long-term knowledge retention ( Bigio et al., 2023; Kozlowska et al., 2022; Le Franc et al., 2022).

Comparison between pedagogical strategies based on neuroplasticity and traditional methods.
Author Description
( Bigio et al., 2023; Kozlowska et al., 2022; Le Franc et al., 2022; Armstrong et al., 2024; Fekonja et al., 2024; Ho & King, 2021) Academic performance and knowledge retention are optimized, promoting a more inclusive and personalized learning environment.
( Barnett et al., 2020; McEwen & Akil, 2020; Trenado et al., 2023; Artru & Rabeyron, 2021; Egger et al., 2024) Approaches such as active learning and gamification favor the formation of new neural connections, improving long-term retention.
( Hishikawa et al., 2023; Karim et al., 2021; Yin et al., 2020) Pedagogical approaches that incorporate neuroplasticity can overcome the limitations of passive learning, promoting effective teaching.
( Li et al., 2020; Shang & Bieszczad, 2022; Sumner et al., 2021; Tsay & Winstein, 2021; Pan & Monje, 2020; Singewald et al., 2023) It allows personalizing teaching according to the needs of the student, ensuring meaningful and lasting learning.
( Mattson et al., 2020; Price & Duman, 2020; Scher, 2024) They favor cognitive flexibility and emotional regulation, impacting knowledge retention and academic performance.

Source: Analysis prepared by the authors.

Neuroplastic learning is based on the ability of the brain to reorganize itself in response to new experiences. Strategies such as active learning, gamification and problem solving strengthen neural networks and improve information retrieval ( Barnett et al., 2020; McEwen & Akil, 2020; Trenado et al., 2023). Unlike traditional approaches, these methodologies encourage interaction with the content, promoting solid synaptic connections and facilitating the application of knowledge ( Armstrong et al., 2024; Fekonja et al., 2024; Ho & King, 2021).

Experiential learning and social interaction are essential to consolidate knowledge, since they promote cognitive flexibility and emotional regulation, key elements in academic performance and intellectual autonomy ( Egger et al., 2024; Pan & Monje, 2020; Singewald et al. al., 2023). Strategies that integrate these principles can improve academic performance and strengthen the ability of students to face intellectual challenges ( Mattson et al., 2020; Price & Duman, 2020; Scher, 2024).

Table 4 describes the institutional resistance to change by teachers and administrators, who prefer traditional models, hindering curricular and pedagogical transformation ( Artru & Rabeyron, 2021; Hamrick & Stranahan, 2020; Wang et al., 2022). This reluctance is aggravated by the lack of specific training in neuroscience and innovative pedagogy, which limits its correct implementation ( Bennett et al., 2020; Eldaief et al., 2022; Lee et al., 2023; Sokołowska, 2024).

Challenges when implementing pedagogical strategies based on neuroplasticity.
Author Description
( Berns et al., 2020; McEwen & Akil, 2020; Shang & Bieszczad, 2022; Artru & Rabeyron, 2021; Hamrick & Stranahan, 2020; Wang et al., 2022) Institutional resistance to change and the tradition of conventional methods hinder the adoption of innovative approaches.
( Barnett et al., 2020; Ho & King, 2021; Lehmann et al., 2021; Arida & Teixeira-Machado, 2021; Fair & Yeo, 2020; Yin et al., 2020) The lack of teacher training in neuroscience and innovative pedagogy represents a barrier to the effective implementation of these strategies.
( Araújo et al., 2020; Artru & Rabeyron, 2021; Bennett et al., 2020; Lee et al., 2023; Mattson et al., 2020) The scarcity of financial and technological resources limits investment in tools such as virtual reality and interactive platforms necessary for these methodologies.
( Lee et al., 2023; Pan & Monje, 2020; Sokołowska, 2024) Inadequate infrastructure and lack of access to advanced technologies hinder the integration of pedagogical strategies based on neuroplasticity.
( Duffau, 2021; Le Franc et al., 2022; Marfia et al., 2022; Artru & Rabeyron, 2021; Goldberg, 2022; Lee et al., 2023; Sokołowska, 2024) The diversity of learning styles and the variability in brain plasticity of students complicate the standardization of these methodologies.

Source: Analysis prepared by the authors.

Another relevant challenge is the scarcity of financial and technological resources. The implementation of these strategies requires advanced technologies, such as virtual reality and interactive platforms, which implies significant investments in infrastructure and training ( McEwen & Akil, 2020; Shang & Bieszczad, 2022; Nishio et al., 2024). The diversity in learning styles makes standardization difficult, since brain plasticity varies between individuals, which requires flexible and personalized approaches ( Duffau, 2021; Le Franc et al., 2022; Marfia et al., 2022).

From a methodological approach, evaluating the effectiveness of these strategies remains a challenge, since traditional methods of measuring academic performance do not accurately capture their benefits ( Armstrong et al., 2024; Ekman et al., 2022; Gomutbutra et al., 2022). Longitudinal studies and innovative evaluation approaches are required to validate their impact on the consolidation of knowledge and the development of cognitive and socioemotional skills ( Scher, 2024; Soliman et al., 2021).

Table 5 shows that pedagogical strategies based on neuroplasticity strengthen student motivation and commitment compared to traditional methods, which are usually more passive and focused on memorization ( Artru & Rabeyron, 2021; Bennett et al., 2020; Sokołowska, 2024). These methodologies generate dynamic and interactive environments, promoting a greater connection of the student with the academic content ( Araújo et al., 2020; Eldaief et al., 2022; Lee et al., 2023).

Influence of strategies based on neuroplasticity on motivation and commitment.
Author Description
( Gomutbutra et al., 2022; Shang & Bieszczad, 2022; Trenado et al., 2023; Criscuolo et al., 2022; Sokołowska, 2024; Wang et al., 2022) Gamification, virtual tasks and training in simulated environments enhance motivation and commitment by allowing students to visualize their progress and receive immediate feedback.
( Bigio et al., 2023; Karim et al., 2021; Nishio et al., 2024; Tsay & Winstein, 2021; Artru & Rabeyron, 2021; Goldberg, 2022; Lee et al., 2023; Mattson et al., 2020; Singewald et al., 2023; Wang et al., 2022) They stimulate curiosity, creativity and experimentation, which strengthens intrinsic motivation and the involvement of students in the learning process.
( Ekman et al., 2022; Lehmann et al., 2021; Yin et al., 2020; Bennett et al., 2020; Goldberg, 2022; Hamrick & Stranahan, 2020; Mattson et al., 2020; Pan & Monje, 2020) Immediate feedback and multisensory learning facilitate student adaptation, favoring knowledge retention and academic engagement.
( Barnett et al., 2020; Duffau, 2021; Fair & Yeo, 2020; Pal, 2021) It strengthens self-efficacy and emotional connection with the content, increasing student confidence and autonomy.
( Kozlowska et al., 2022; Le Franc et al., 2022; Tortella et al., 2021; Araújo et al., 2020; Bennett et al., 2020; Eldaief et al., 2022; Lee et al., 2023; Sokołowska, 2024) The personalization of learning through neuroplasticity allows content to be adapted to the individual styles of students, favoring their motivation and improving their academic performance.

Source: Analysis prepared by the authors.

The use of active strategies such as gamification, experiential learning and immersion in virtual environments stimulates curiosity and creativity, key to sustaining intrinsic motivation ( Gomutbutra et al., 2022; Shang & Bieszczad, 2022; Trenado et al., 2023). In addition, by providing immediate feedback, students can adjust their learning in real time, strengthening their self-efficacy and confidence ( Ekman et al., 2022; Lehmann et al., 2021; Yin et al., 2020).

Finally, these strategies promote collaborative and multisensory learning environments, strengthening student belonging and involvement in their training ( Bennett et al., 2020; Hamrick & Stranahan, 2020; Mattson et al., 2020). Evidence indicates that neuroplasticity enhances motivation and commitment, overcoming limitations of traditional approaches.

Table 6 shows that pedagogical strategies based on neuroplasticity favor the development of soft skills in university students. Unlike traditional methods focused on memorization, these strategies promote active learning, experimentation and social interaction, facilitating the acquisition of key interpersonal skills for the academic and professional field ( Araújo et al., 2020; Artru & Rabeyron, 2021; Wang et al., 2022).

Impact of strategies based on neuroplasticity in the development of soft skills.
Author Description
( Gomutbutra et al., 2022; Shang & Bieszczad, 2022; Trenado et al., 2023; Criscuolo et al., 2022; Eldaief et al., 2022; Hong et al., 2023; Sokołowska, 2024) They stimulate creativity and improve student confidence, facilitating the application of knowledge in various contexts and strengthening the capacity for experiential learning.
( Arida & Teixeira-Machado, 2021; Berns et al., 2020; Marfia et al., 2022; Sumner et al., 2021; Araújo et al., 2020; Artru & Rabeyron, 2021; Bennett et al., 2020; Lee et al., 2023; Mattson et al., 2020; Pan & Monje, 2020; Singewald et al., 2023; Sinha et al., 2021; Wang et al., 2022) They positively impact effective communication, teamwork, problem solving and empathy, preparing students for the professional field.
( Ekman et al., 2022; Lehmann et al., 2021; Yin et al., 2020; Barnett et al., 2020; Duffau, 2021; Fair & Yeo, 2020; Pal, 2021) They contribute to the development of empathy, adaptability and emotional intelligence, improving social interaction and leadership capacity in professional environments.
( Armstrong et al., 2024; Fekonja et al., 2024; Ho & King, 2021; McEwen & Akil, 2020; Kozlowska et al., 2022; Le Franc et al., 2022; Tortella et al., 2021) They generate a dynamic learning environment that enhances collaboration, resilience and critical thinking, promoting self-efficacy and stress management.

Source: Analysis prepared by the authors.

A central benefit of these methodologies is the stimulation of creativity and confidence, essential for problem solving and critical thinking ( Gomutbutra et al., 2022; Shang & Bieszczad, 2022; Trenado et al., 2023). They also strengthen resilience and self-awareness, allowing better adaptation to dynamic environments ( Bigio et al., 2023; Karim et al., 2021; Nishio et al., 2024; Tsay & Winstein, 2021).

The impact of neuroplasticity on generating socioemotional skills, such as empathy and adaptability, promoting greater emotional intelligence and self-efficacy ( Barnett et al., 2020; Duffau, 2021; Pal, 2021). These skills optimize communication and teamwork, favoring labor insertion ( Artru & Rabeyron, 2021; Goldberg, 2022; Mattson et al., 2020).

In addition, the use of virtual environments and gamification enhances student confidence and self-assessment, facilitating stress management and reflection on their learning ( Criscuolo et al., 2022; Price & Duman, 2020; Scher, 2024). However, further empirical validation is required to consolidate its long-term effectiveness ( Duffau, 2021; Egger et al., 2024; Janušonis et al., 2023; Peng et al., 2022).

 Discussion

Pedagogical strategies based on neuroplasticity impact academic performance, motivation and the development of soft skills in university students. In contrast to traditional methods, these strategies optimize the consolidation of knowledge, personalize learning and adapt to individual differences ( Bigio et al., 2023; Kozlowska et al., 2022; Lee et al., 2023). This is due to the ability of the brain to reorganize itself to specific stimuli, which favors the acquisition of cognitive and socioemotional skills ( Shang & Bieszczad, 2022; Sumner et al., 2021; Tsay & Winstein, 2021).

One of the most relevant effects is its influence on student motivation and commitment. Neuroplastic learning, supported by active interaction and technological tools such as virtual reality and gamification, fosters curiosity and creativity, promoting a deeper connection with academic content ( Gomutbutra et al., 2022; Marfia et al., 2022; Tsay & Winstein, 2021). This approach contrasts with traditional methods, whose rigidity can generate demotivation and reduce student participation ( McEwen & Akil, 2020; Lehmann et al., 2021).

Likewise, its impact on the development of soft skills, essential for labor insertion, is highlighted. Strategies such as collaborative learning and problem-solving strengthen communication, resilience and leadership, improving the professional preparation of students ( Berns et al., 2020; Fair & Yeo, 2020; Wang et al., 2022). However, its implementation faces challenges: institutional resistance, lack of teacher training in applied neuroscience and insufficient technological infrastructure ( Bennett et al., 2020; Goldberg, 2022; Lee et al., 2023).

To guarantee its sustainability, it is necessary to adopt academic policies that promote pedagogical innovation, investment in technology and continuous training of teaching staff ( Duffau, 2021; Egger et al., 2024). These strategies represent an innovative alternative to optimize learning in higher education, increasing retention of knowledge, motivation and student commitment, as well as promoting the development of key skills for the professional world.

Limitations and future lines of research

The methodological variability of the studies analyzed makes it difficult to generalize the results. Although there is evidence on the positive effects of these strategies, the heterogeneity in approaches and evaluation criteria limits the possibility of establishing definitive conclusions about their effectiveness in different educational contexts.

The challenge of measuring its impact. Traditional instruments do not always accurately capture the benefits of learning based on neuroplasticity, which suggests the need to develop accurate assessment methodologies to measure knowledge consolidation and long-term retention.

In addition, infrastructure and access to advanced technology represent significant barriers. Strategies such as virtual reality and gamification require investments in equipment and teacher training, which limits their application in institutions with restricted resources.

From a theoretical perspective, it is still necessary to identify the specific neural mechanisms that underlie the improvement of learning through these strategies. While neuroplasticity has been widely studied in clinical and experimental contexts, its application in education requires further exploration of how the reorganization of neural networks impacts academic performance and the development of socioemotional skills.

Future research should focus on longitudinal studies that evaluate the sustainability of these strategies over time, as well as the comparison of neuroplastic approaches to identify which generate greater benefits according to the student profile and the educational environment. The development of measurement tools based on cognitive neuroscience is recommended, incorporating techniques such as neuroimaging or biometric data analysis to evaluate changes in brain plasticity associated with learning.

 Ethics and consent

The research process involved reviewing the literature based on a population that was defined as shown in the PRISMA diagram ( Figure 1). The documents analysed were extracted from the SCOPUS database. The study was conducted in accordance with the ethical principles of the Declaration of Helsinki.

The study was conducted in accordance with the research guidelines established by Señor de Sipán University, as well as the ethical principles set forth in the Declaration of Helsinki and current national regulations.

 Data availability statement

No data associated with this article

Reporting guidelines

PRISMA: Zenodo. Neuroplasticity and University Education: Impact of Pedagogical Strategies on Learning Outcomes—A Systematic Review. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18760294 ( Barturen Mondragón et al., 2026).

The data is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence (CC-BY 4.0).

 References Araújo JRC Coelho CB Campos AR : Animal galectins and plant lectins as tools for studies in neurosciences. Curr. Neuropharmacol. 2020;18(3):202–215. 31622208 10.2174/1570159X17666191016092221 PMC7327950 Arida RM Teixeira-Machado L : The contribution of physical exercise to brain resilience. Front. Behav. Neurosci. 2021;14:626769. 33584215 10.3389/fnbeh.2020.626769 PMC7874196 Armstrong M Castellanos J Christie D : Chronic pain as an emergent property of a complex system and the potential roles of psychedelic therapies. Frontiers in Pain Research. 2024;5:1346053. 38706873 10.3389/fpain.2024.1346053 PMC11066302 Artru E Rabeyron T : Psychedelics, psychotherapy and symbolization: a literature review focusing on major depressive disorders. Evol. Psychiatr. 2021;86(3):591–616. 10.1016/j.evopsy.2021.03.013 Barnett AI Pickersgill M Dilkes-Frayne E : Neural imaginaries at work: exploring Australian addiction treatment providers’ selective representations of the brain in clinical practice. Soc. Sci. Med. 2020;255:112977. 32371268 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112977 PMC7613167 Barturen Mondragón EM Cabrera Cabrera X Pisfil Benites NI : Lista de verificación PRISMA. Zenodo. 2026. 10.5281/zenodo.18760294 Bennett CR Bauer CM Bailin ES : Neuroplasticity in cerebral visual impairment (CVI): Assessing functional vision and the neurophysiological correlates of dorsal stream dysfunction. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2020;108:171–181. 31655075 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.10.011 PMC6949360 Berns C Brüchle W Scho S : Intensity dependent effect of cognitive training on motor cortical plasticity and cognitive performance in humans. Exp. Brain Res. 2020;238(12):2805–2818. 33025030 10.1007/s00221-020-05933-5 PMC7644474 Bigio B Sagi Y Barnhill O : Epigenetic embedding of childhood adversity: Mitochondrial metabolism and neurobiology of stress-related CNS diseases. Front. Mol. Neurosci. 2023;16:1183184. 37564785 10.3389/fnmol.2023.1183184 PMC10411541 Costa RLS : Neurociência e aprendizagem (Neuroscience and learning). Revista Brasileira de Educacao. 2023;28:e280010. 10.1590/S1413-24782023280010 Chen M Chen Z Xiao X : Corticospinal circuit neuroplasticity may involve silent synapses: Implications for functional recovery facilitated by neuromodulation after spinal cord injury. IBRO Neuroscience Reports. 2023;14:185–194. 36824667 10.1016/j.ibneur.2022.08.005 PMC9941655 Choudhury S Wannyn W : Politics of plasticity: implications of the new science of the “teen brain” for education. Cult. Med. Psychiatry. 2022;46:31–58. 34216345 10.1007/s11013-021-09731-8 Criscuolo A Pando-Naude V Bonetti L : An ALE meta-analytic review of musical expertise. Sci. Rep. 2022;12(1):11726. 35821035 10.1038/s41598-022-14959-4 PMC9276732 Díaz Rodríguez FD : Neuroplasticity, education, and mental health. Opuntia Brava. 2024;16(1):239–248. Reference Source Dietsch A Westemeyer R Schultz D : Brain activity associated with taste stimulation: A mechanism for neuroplastic change?. Brain Behav. 2023;13:e2928. 36860129 10.1002/brb3.2928 PMC10097078 Duffau H : The death of localizationism: The concepts of functional connectome and neuroplasticity deciphered by awake mapping, and their implications for best care of brain-damaged patients. Rev. Neurol. 2021;177(9):1093–1103. 34563375 10.1016/j.neurol.2021.07.016 Egger K Aicher HD Cumming P : Neurobiological research on N,N-dimethyltryptamine (DMT) and its potentiation by monoamine oxidase (MAO) inhibition: From ayahuasca to synthetic combinations of DMT and MAO inhibitors. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2024;81(1):395. 39254764 10.1007/s00018-024-05353-6 PMC11387584 Ekman R Fletcher A Giota J : A flourishing brain in the 21st century: a scoping review of the impact of developing good habits for mind, brain, well-being, and learning. Mind Brain Educ. 2022;16(1):13–23. 10.1111/mbe.12305 Eldaief MC Dickerson BC Camprodon JA : Transcranial magnetic stimulation for the neurological patient: scientific principles and applications. Semin. Neurol. 2022;42(2):149–157. 35213900 10.1055/s-0041-1742265 PMC9838190 Fair DA Yeo BTT : Precision neuroimaging opens a new chapter of neuroplasticity experimentation. Neuron. 2020;107(3):401–403. 32758445 10.1016/j.neuron.2020.07.017 PMC8033443 Fekonja LS Schenk R Schröder E : The digital twin in neuroscience: from theory to tailored therapy. Front. Neurosci. 2024;18. 39376542 10.3389/fnins.2024.1454856 PMC11457707 Foster J Lopez I : Human neurodevelopment: A continuous change process of an open and context-sensitive system. Rev. Med. Clin. Condes. 2022;33(4):338–346. 10.1016/j.rmclc.2022.06.001 Gellner A Reis J Fiebich B : Cx3cr1 deficiency interferes with learning- and direct current stimulation-mediated neuroplasticity of the motor cortex. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2024;59:177–191. 38049944 10.1111/ejn.16206 Goldberg H : Growing brains, nurturing minds—neuroscience as an educational tool to support students’ development as life-long learners. Brain Sci. 2022;12(12). 36552082 10.3390/brainsci12121622 PMC9775149 Gomutbutra P Srikamjak T Sapinun L : Effect of intensive weekend mindfulness-based intervention on BDNF, mitochondria function, and anxiety. A randomized, crossover clinical trial. Comprehensive Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2022;11:100137. 35757176 10.1016/j.cpnec.2022.100137 PMC9216335 Hamrick MW Stranahan AM : Metabolic regulation of aging and age-related disease. Ageing Res. Rev. 2020;64:101175. 32971259 10.1016/j.arr.2020.101175 PMC8765571 Hanson R Shapiro S Hutton-Thamm E : Learning to learn from positive experiences. J. Posit. Psychol. 2023;18:142–153. 10.1080/17439760.2021.2006759 Hill G Johnson F Uy J : Moderate intensity aerobic exercise may enhance neuroplasticity of the contralesional hemisphere after stroke: a randomised controlled study. Sci. Rep. 2023;13(1):14440. 37660093 10.1038/s41598-023-40902-2 PMC10475034 Hishikawa K Yoshinaga K Togo H : Changes in functional brain activity patterns associated with computer programming learning in novices. Brain Struct. Funct. 2023;228(7):1691–1701. 37474776 10.1007/s00429-023-02674-3 Ho TC King LS : Mechanisms of neuroplasticity linking early adversity to depression: Developmental considerations. Transl. Psychiatry. 2021;11(1):517. 34628465 10.1038/s41398-021-01639-6 PMC8501358 Hong T-Y Yang C-J Shih C-H : Enhanced intrinsic functional connectivity in the visual system of visual artist: Implications for creativity. Front. Neurosci. 2023;17:1114771. 36908805 10.3389/fnins.2023.1114771 PMC9992720 Janušonis S Haiman JH Metzler R : Predicting the distribution of serotonergic axons: A supercomputing simulation of reflected fractional Brownian motion in a 3D-mouse brain model. Front. Comput. Neurosci. 2023;17:1189853. 37265780 10.3389/fncom.2023.1189853 PMC10231035 Karim AKMR Proulx MJ Sousa AA de : Neuroplasticity and crossmodal connectivity in the normal, healthy brain. Psychol. Neurosci. 2021;14(3):298–334. 36937077 10.1037/pne0000258 PMC10019101 Korenar M Treffers-Daller J Pliatsikas C : Brain structure adapts dynamically to highly demanding bilingual experiences: Insights from interpreters and translators. Ampersand. 2023;11:100148. 10.1016/j.amper.2023.100148 Kozlowska U Nichols C Wiatr K : From psychiatry to neurology: Psychedelics as prospective therapeutics for neurodegenerative disorders. J. Neurochem. 2022;162(1):89–108. 34519052 10.1111/jnc.15509 Le Franc S Herrera Altamira G Guillen M : Toward an adapted neurofeedback for post-stroke motor rehabilitation: state of the art and perspectives. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 2022;16:917909. 35911589 10.3389/fnhum.2022.917909 PMC9332194 Lee S-M Koo B Carré C : Exploring the brain epitranscriptome: Perspectives from the NSAS summit. Front. Neurosci. 2023;17:1291446. 37928731 10.3389/fnins.2023.1291446 PMC10625424 Lehmann N Aye N Kaufmann J : Longitudinal reproducibility of neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging (noddi) derived metrics in the white matter. Neuroscience. 2021;457:165–185. 33465411 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2021.01.005 Li HB Liang WB Zhou L : The experimental research on neuroplasticity in rats’ hippocampus subjected to chronic cerebral hypoperfusion and interfered by Modified Dioscorea Pills. Heliyon. 2020;6(1):e02897. 31909235 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02897 PMC6938820 Marfia G Navone SE Guarnaccia L : Space flight and central nervous system: Friends or enemies? Challenges and opportunities for neuroscience and neuro-oncology. J. Neurosci. Res. 2022;100(9):1649–1663. 35678198 10.1002/jnr.25066 PMC9544848 Mattson MP Moehl K Ghena N : Publisher Correction: Intermittent metabolic switching, neuroplasticity and brain health (Nature Reviews Neuroscience, (2018), 19, 2, (81-94), 10.1038/nrn.2017.156). Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2020;21(8):445. 10.1038/s41583-020-0342-y McEwen BS Akil H : Revisiting the stress concept: Implications for affective disorders. J. Neurosci. 2020;40(1):12–21. 31896560 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0733-19.2019 PMC6939488 Nájera González E Bran Solórzano A Canel Pinto I : Influence of digitalization in the 21st century on neuroplasticity. CUNZAC Acad. J. 2021;4(1):81–86. 10.46780/cunzac.v4i1.36 Nishio Y Lindsley CW Bender AM : Classics in Chemical Neuroscience: Tianeptine. ACS Chem. Neurosci. 2024;15(21):3863–3873. 10.1021/acschemneuro.4c00519 Pal MM : Glutamate: The master neurotransmitter and its implications in chronic stress and mood disorders. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 2021;15:722323. 34776901 10.3389/fnhum.2021.722323 PMC8586693 Pan Y Monje M : Activity shapes neural circuit form and function: a historical perspective. J. Neurosci. 2020;40(5):944–954. 31996470 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0740-19.2019 PMC6988998 Peng Z Xu L Wang H : The lateralization of spatial cognition in table tennis players: neuroplasticity in the dominant hemisphere. Brain Sci. 2022;12(12). 10.3390/brainsci12121607 Price RB Duman R : Neuroplasticity in cognitive and psychological mechanisms of depression: An integrative model. Mol. Psychiatry. 2020;25(3):530–543. 31801966 10.1038/s41380-019-0615-x PMC7047599 Rodrigues F Carvalho L : Developing an agile brain: how habits influence learning, memorization, and how to perform better. International Journal of Professional Business. 2023;8(4):e01930. 10.26668/businessreview/2023.v8i4.1930 Sarı I Lunghi C : Different Forms of Plasticity Interact in Adult Humans. eNeuro. 2023;10(7). Reference Source Scher MS : Interdisciplinary fetal-neonatal neurology training improves brain health across the lifespan. Front. Neurol. 2024;15:1411987. 39026582 10.3389/fneur.2024.1411987 PMC11254674 Shang A Bieszczad KM : Epigenetic mechanisms regulate cue memory underlying discriminative behavior. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2022;141:104811. 35961385 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2022.104811 PMC10353403 Singewald N Sartori SB Reif A : Alleviating anxiety and taming trauma: novel pharmacotherapeutics for anxiety disorders and posttraumatic stress disorder. Neuropharmacology. 2023;226:109418. 36623804 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2023.109418 PMC10372846 Sinha N Berg CN Yassa MA : Increased dynamic flexibility in the medial temporal lobe network following an exercise intervention mediates generalization of prior learning. Neurobiol. Learn. Mem. 2021;177:107340. 33186745 10.1016/j.nlm.2020.107340 PMC7861122 Sokołowska B : Being in virtual reality and its influence on brain health—an overview of benefits, limitations and prospects. Brain Sci. 2024;14(1):72. 38248287 10.3390/brainsci14010072 PMC10813118 Soliman RK Tax CMW Abo-Elfetoh N : Effects of TDCS on language recovery in post-stroke aphasia: A pilot study investigating clinical parameters and white matter change with diffusion imaging. Brain Sci. 2021;11(10). 34679342 10.3390/brainsci11101277 PMC8534035 Sumner RL Spriggs MJ Shaw AD : Modelling thalamocortical circuitry shows that visually induced LTP changes laminar connectivity in human visual cortex. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2021;17(1):e1008414. 33476341 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008414 PMC7853500 Tortella GR Seabra AB Padrão J : Mindfulness and other simple neuroscience-based proposals to promote the learning performance and mental health of students during the covid-19 pandemic. Brain Sci. 2021;11(5):552. 33925627 10.3390/brainsci11050552 PMC8145019 Trenado C Pedroarena-Leal N Ruge D : The prospect of focal ultrasound in the treatment of mental disorders. Psychiatry International. 2023;4(3):297–306. 10.3390/psychiatryint4030029 Tsay JS Winstein CJ : Five features to look for in early-phase clinical intervention studies. Neurorehabil. Neural Repair. 2021;35(1):3–9. 33243083 10.1177/1545968320975439 PMC9873309 Wang J Holt LM Huang HH : Astrocytes in cocaine addiction and beyond. Mol. Psychiatry. 2022;27(1):652–668. 33837268 10.1038/s41380-021-01080-7 PMC8501151 Yin T Ma P Tian Z : Machine learning in neuroimaging: a new approach to understand acupuncture for neuroplasticity. Neural Plast. 2020;2020(1):8871712. 32908491 10.1155/2020/8871712 PMC7463415 10.5256/f1000research.194008.r482296 Reviewer response for version 1 Azzahra Waliyyatu 1 Referee https://orcid.org/0009-0004-9976-0460 Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung, Indonesia

Competing interests: No competing interests were disclosed.

 16 6 2026 Copyright: © 2026 Azzahra W 2026 This is an open access peer review report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. recommendation approve-with-reservations

ABSTRACT

1. Explicitly state the research gap.

2. Correct the duplicated sentence fragment (The verb promote appears twice)

such as the However, challenges in their implementation were identified..."

This repetition suggests insufficient proofreading.

3. Temper conclusions to align with the evidence presented.

4. Indicate the strength or consistency of findings

INTRODUCTION

1. Clear research gap: explain what is missing in the literature.

2. Discuss: active learning, gamification, experiential learning, technology-enhanced learning

3. Explain how neuroplasticity influences learning outcomes.

4. Explain why a systematic review is necessary, and end with a clear aim and research question.

METHODS

The title suggests: "Impact of Pedagogical Strategies on Learning Outcomes"

However, the methods investigate: 1. Academic performance, 2. Retention, 3. Motivation, 4. Engagement, 5. Soft skills, 6. Implementation barriers.

These represent multiple review objectives.

Concern: the review becomes overly broad.

Suggestion: Organize research questions into primary and secondary outcomes.

Add

- PRISMA 2020 compliance statement

Revise

- The manuscript states: "applying the PICO methodology". PICO is not a methodology.

PICO is a framework used to formulate research questions, search terms, eligibility criteria.

- PICO definition 

(The manuscript defines: Results, instead of: Outcomes)

To strengthen scientific rigor and reproducibility, the authors should substantially revise the methodology by incorporating transparent screening procedures, study quality appraisal, detailed eligibility criteria, and a more comprehensive literature search strategy. 

RESULTS

This thematic structure is appropriate for a systematic review. However, the section suffers from a fundamental methodological problem: it reads more like a narrative literature review or discussion than a results section of a systematic review.

The article does not contain conclusion.

Are the rationale for, and objectives of, the Systematic Review clearly stated?

Partly

Is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?

Partly

If this is a Living Systematic Review, is the ‘living’ method appropriate and is the search schedule clearly defined and justified? (‘Living Systematic Review’ or a variation of this term should be included in the title.)

Partly

Are sufficient details of the methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?

Partly

Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results presented in the review?

Partly

Reviewer Expertise:

science education, brain-based learning, systematic literature review

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard, however I have significant reservations, as outlined above.