F1000Research F1000Research 2046-1402 F1000 Research Limited London, UK 10.12688/f1000research.6617.1 Research Article Articles Agriculture & Biotechnology Plant Genetics & Gene Expression Structure: RNA Structure: Transcription & Translation YeATS - a tool suite for analyzing RNA-seq derived transcriptome identifies a highly transcribed putative extensin in heartwood/sapwood transition zone in black walnut

[version 1; peer review: 1 approved with reservations]

 Chakraborty Sandeep https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0455-0723 a 1 Britton Monica 2 Wegrzyn Jill 3 Butterfield Timothy 1 Rao Basuthkar J. 4 Leslie Charles A. 1 Aradhaya Mallikarjuna 1 Neale David 1 Woeste Keith 5 Dandekar Abhaya M. 1 Plant Sciences Department, University of California, Davis, CA, 95616, USA UC Davis Genome Center Bioinformatics Core Facility, University of California, Davis, CA, 95616, USA Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, 06269, USA Department of Biological Sciences, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Homi Bhaba Road, Mumbai, 400, India USDA Forest Service Hardwood Tree Improvement and Regeneration Center, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, 47907, USA sanchak@gmail.com

The YeATS tool suite was designed by Chakraborty, Britton and Wegrzyn did the analysis of the transcriptome, Woeste isolated the RNA, Butterfield was involved in the validation. The rest of the authors were involved in various aspects of the study design. Chakraborty wrote the first draft and the rest of the authors were involved in the editing.

Competing interests: No competing interests were disclosed.

 17 6 2015 2015 4 155 11 6 2015 Copyright: © 2015 Chakraborty S et al. 2015 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

The transcriptome provides a functional footprint of the genome by enumerating the molecular components of cells and tissues. The field of transcript discovery has been revolutionized through high-throughput mRNA sequencing (RNA-seq). Here, we present a methodology that replicates and improves existing methodologies, and implements a workflow for error estimation and correction followed by genome annotation and transcript abundance estimation for RNA-seq derived transcriptome sequences (YeATS). - Yet Another Tool Suite for analyzing RNA-seq derived transcriptome). A unique feature of YeATS is the upfront determination of the errors in the sequencing or transcript assembly process by analyzing open reading frames of transcripts. YeATS identifies transcripts that have not been merged, result in broken open reading frames or contain long repeats as erroneous transcripts. We present the YeATS workflow using a representative sample of the transcriptome from the tissue at the heartwood/sapwood transition zone in black walnut. A novel feature of the transcriptome that emerged from our analysis was the identification of a highly abundant transcript that had no known homologous genes (GenBank accession: KT023102). The amino acid composition of the longest open reading frame of this gene classifies this as a putative extensin. Also, we corroborated the transcriptional abundance of proline-rich proteins, dehydrins, senescence-associated proteins, and the DNAJ family of chaperone proteins. Thus, YeATS presents a workflow for analyzing RNA-seq data with several innovative features that differentiate it from existing software.

 RNA-seq transcriptome open reading frame extensin proline-rich proteins dehydrins senescence-associated proteins Computational genomics Juglans nigra black walnut heartwood/sapwood transition zone The authors wish to acknowledge support from the California Walnut Board and UC Discovery program. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. Introduction

Analysis of the complete set of RNA molecules in a cell, the transcriptome, is critical to understanding the functional aspects of the genome of an organism. Most transcripts get translated into proteins by the ribosome 1 . Non-translated transcripts (noncoding RNAs) may be alternatively spliced and/or broken into smaller RNAs, the importance of which have only recently been recognized 2 . Transcriptional levels vary significantly based on environmental cues 3 , and/or disease 4 . Quantifying transcriptional levels constitutes an important methodology in current biological research. Traditional methods like RNA:DNA hybridization 5 and short sequence-based approaches 6 have been supplanted recently by a high-throughput DNA sequencing method - RNA-seq 7, 8 . Concomitant with the introduction of RNA-seq has been the development of a diverse set of computational methods for analyzing the resultant data 9– 21 .

In the current work, we present a methodology for analyzing RNA-seq data that has been assembled into transcripts ( YeATS - Yet Another Tool Suite for analyzing RNA-seq derived transcriptome). The process of associating genomic open reading frames (ORF) to a set of transcripts (transcriptome) is the key step in YeATS, enabling identification and correction of specific errors arising from sequencing and/or assembly, a novel feature missing in most known tools. These errors include transcripts that have not been merged, a transcript having broken ORFs and transcripts containing long repeats. Also, YeATS identifies noncoding RNAs by comparison to compiled databases 22 , transcripts with multiple coding sequences and highly transcribed genes (based on simple normalization of raw counts followed by sorting).

Here, the YeATS workflow is demonstrated using a representative sample of the transcriptome from the tissue at the heartwood/sapwood transition zone in black walnut ( Juglans nigra L.). We have identified transcripts that have sequencing and/or assembly errors (~5%). A novel feature that emerged from our analysis was the presence of a highly transcribed gene that had no known homologous counterpart in the entire BLAST database. The amino acid composition of the longest open reading frame of this gene consists of a high percentage of leucine, histidine and valine, and classifies this as a putative extensin 23 . Given the economic and ecological importance of black walnut timber, characterization of such genes will enhance our understanding of the mechanisms underlying the unique properties associated with the wood of these trees 24 . The significance of proline-rich proteins 25 , dehydrins 26 , senescence-associated proteins 27 and DNAJ 28 proteins to the formation of heartwood was established through their transcriptional abundance. Finally, based on transcripts that have no known homologs, we have identified noncoding RNAs by comparison with the noncoding RNA database for Arabidopsis 22 . Thus, in the current work, we present a workflow (YeATS) with several novel features absent in most currently available software.

 Methods <italic toggle="yes">In silico</italic> methods

The input to YeATS is a set of post assembly transcripts as a fasta file ( φ TRS ). The first step is to identify the set of genes (proteins) encoded by φ TRS . This is done by associating a proper open reading frame (ORF) to each transcript. This involves a comprehensive automated BLAST run 29 .

For each transcript in φ TRS , we generate the three longest ORFs (using the ‘getorf’ utility in the EMBOSS suite 30 ) ( Figure 1). These three ORFs are BLAST’ed to the full non-redundant protein sequences (‘nr’) database. For a given E-value cutoff (1E-12 in the current work), we create four sets

Only one ORF is less than the cutoff - the transcript is uniquely annotated.

None of the ORFs is less than the cutoff - the transcript has no known homologs.

More than one ORF is less than the cutoff.

The ORFs map to the same protein, often in distinct regions - this points to an error in the sequencing or the assembly.

The ORFs map to different proteins - these are instances of a transcript having two valid ORFs. We duplicate the transcript, associating each one to a different protein sequence.

Flowchart for YeATS.

For each transcript, the three longest open reading frames (ORF) are obtained using the ‘getorf’, and these were BLAST’ed to the full non-redundant protein sequences (‘nr’) database. Based on the number of significant matches, the transcriptome is partitioned. Unique genes have only one significant match, erroneous transcripts have multiple ORFs matching the same gene, while duplicate genes have multiple distinct matches.

To produce the uniquely annotated set of genes, we ignored entries with the keywords chromosome, hypothetical, unnamed, unknown and uncharacterized, in order to have a functional characteristic in the annotation, provided the final annotated entry has low E-value. Also, apart from comparing E-values, we also compare the BLAST score, choosing an ORF as unique if its BLAST score was more than twice any other BLAST score, even if other scores satisfied the E-value criteria.

Algorithm 1 describes the process of merging transcripts ( SI Figure 1). For a given length (which varies from 5 to 15 in this case), the 5’ and 3’ sequences and identifiers of each transcript are stored in new string databases: 3’=Begin; 5’=End. Repetitive strings (strings that have only two letters) are ignored, as it is difficult to ensure their uniqueness. For each string of n length in the Begin (3’) string database, we find whether: a) unique matches of n length (one-to-one mapping) are present in the End (5’) string database and b) that the prefixes (initial transcript identifiers) of the transcripts are the same.

MergeTRS - Merge two transcripts

Input: φ TRS ⇐ Set of transcripts

Output: φ TRSMERGED : Pairs of transcripts that can be

             merged

begin

       φ TRSMERGED ← 0;

       while NewStatesAdded do

            foreach TRS i in φ TRS do

                  φ BEGIN ← 0;

                  φ END ← 0;

                  foreach len:5..15 do

                      AddBeginingofTRS( φ BEGIN , TRS i , len);

                      AddEndofTRS( φ END , TRS i , len);

                  end

                  foreach string i in φ BEGIN do

                      /* ignore strings that have less than 3 letters, these are repetitive*/

                      IgnoreRepeats( string i );

                      if(∃ only one string j in φ END ) such that prefixof( TRS i ) == prefixof( TRS j ))[

                       φ TRSMERGED ←

                      AddtoMergeableSet( TRS i,TRS j );

                      ]

                  end

            end

       end

      return φ TRSMERGED ;

end

Algorithm 2 describes the iterative method for identifying homologous genes in the genome based on the transcriptome. First, the transcriptome is converted to a set of protein sequences by choosing the appropriate ORF (described above) as the representative protein sequence, and a BLAST database (TRSDB) is created. An input protein sequence (possibly from another organism) of a gene of interest is used to query TRSDB using BLAST 29 . This results in a set of significant transcript matches which is pruned based on a cutoff identity (40% in this case) and the criterion that the sequence length should not differ more than another parameterizable value (50 in this case). Both these transcripts are now potential genes, and the above mentioned process is repeated for each of them, until no new transcripts are added.

FindGene - Iterative method to identify homologous genes based on the transcriptome

Input: G ⇐ Amino acid sequence of gene

Input: TRSDB ⇐ BLAST database of the protein sequences from each transcript, choosing the longest ORF as the representative protein sequence

Input: identitycutoff ⇐ Ignore matches which are less than identitycutoff % identical to the sequence under consideration

Input: lengthcutoff ⇐ Ignore matches where the sequence length differs by more than lengthcutoff % from the sequence under consideration

Output: φ genes

begin

      φ genes ← G;

      φ processed ← 0;

      NewStatesAdded ← 1;

      while NewStatesAdded do

           NewStatesAdded ← 0;

           foreach G i in φ genes such that G i is not in

           φ processed do

                φ processed ← G i ;

               ϕ i BLAST = BLAST G i on TRSDB;

                foreach TRS i in ϕ i BLAST do

                     difflength ←

                     length( G i ) – length( TRS i ) ;

                    if(identity( TRS i , G i ) > identitycutoff ^

                    ( difflength < lengthcutoff)) [

                     NewStatesAdded ← 1;

                     φ genes ← TRS i ;

                    ]

                end

           end

     end

     /* This is not a TRS, but an input - remove this from the set*/

     remove G from φ genes ;

     return φ genes ;

end

The raw counts for each transcript is normalized according to Equation 1, assuming a read length of 100.

Score normal = 100 ∗ [ Score raw / ( Length ( transcript ) ) ] ;         ( 1 )

The sequence alignment was done using ClustalW 31 . The alignment images were generated using SeaView 32 .

 <italic toggle="yes">In vitro</italic> methods

Total RNA was isolated from the xylem region immediately external to the heartwood of a 16 year-old black walnut. The tree was felled in November, cross sections about 1 inch thick were taken from the base and dropped immediately into liquid nitrogen. After the sections were fully frozen they were transported to the lab on dry ice. The transition zone was then chiseled and the xylem was ground using a freezer mill. The RNA was extracted from 100g of ground wood using lithium chloride extraction buffer, and subsequently treated with DNAse (to remove genomic DNA) using an RNA/DNA Mini Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA) per the manufacturers protocol. Presence of RNA was confirmed by running an aliquot on an Experion Automated Electrophoresis System (Bio- Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA). The cDNA libraries were constructed following the Illumina mRNA-sequencing sample preparation protocol (Illumina Inc., San Diego, CA). Final elution was performed with 16 μL RNase-free water. Each library was run as an independent lane on a Genome Analyzer II (Illumina, San Diego, CA) to generate paired end sequences of 85 bp in length from each cDNA library. The reads were trimmed to remove adapter contamination and low quality sequences using Scythe and Sickle ( https://github.com/ucdavis-bioinformatics). Trimmed reads were aligned to the J. regia ‘Chandler’ transcriptome fasta assembled using Trinity (manuscript in preparation) with BWA’s short read aligner v.0.6.2 (‘bwa aln’) ( http://bio-bwa.sourceforge.net/) 33 .

 Results

The input dataset to the YeATS tool was a set of transcripts, transcript identifiers and their corresponding raw counts (see Supporting information), obtained from the tissue at the heartwood/sapwood transition zone (TZ) in black walnut ( Juglans nigra L.) ( Figure 2). These raw counts were normalized (see Methods), and transcripts with zero counts were ignored (see rawcounts.normalized.TZ in Dataset 1). There were ~24K such transcripts ( ϕ transcript TZ ) .

Heartwood/sapwood transition zone in black walnut.

A cross section of a mature black walnut ( Juglans nigra) stem showing the light-colored sapwood (Secondary xylem), darkly colored heartwood which contains no living cells. The transition zone (TZ) is immediately external to the heartwood highlighted by the yellow line in the red box. Cell death is actively occurring in this TZ tissue.

README

FASTADIR.tgz : 24k transcripts

ORFS.tgz : open reading frames from 24k transcripts computed from the ‘getorf’ tool from the Emboss suite.

list.merged.txt : transcripts that have been merged based on overlapping ends

High.TZ.genome.annotated.csv : transcripts having only one ORF with a high significance match

Lower.TZ.genome.annotated.csv : transcripts having only one ORF with a lower significance match

TZ.genome.annotated.none.csv : transcripts with no match

TZ.genome.errors : transcripts which have two ORFs matching with high significance to the same gene

TZ.genome.annotated.morethanone.csv : transcripts having more than one ORFs which match to different genes with high significance

rawcounts.TZ: Raw counts

rawcounts.normalized.TZ: Normalized counts

In order to associate a transcript to a specific open reading frame (ORF), the ORFs of ϕ transcript TZ is obtained using ‘getorf’ from the Emboss suite 30 (see ORFS.tgz in Supporting information) ( Figure 1). The three longest ORFs for each transcript is BLAST’ed to the full non-redundant protein sequences (‘nr’) database, and the results were used to characterize the genes.

There were ~1200 transcripts that had possible sequencing or assembly errors, ~22K transcripts that had significant matches (E-value<E-12) in the ‘nr’ database, 113 transcripts that had lower matches (E-12<E-value<E-08) in the ‘nr’ database, ~700 transcripts that had no matches in the ‘nr’ database and about 200 transcripts that could be merged based on overlapping amino acid sequences. We describe these in detail below.

Possible sequencing error or mis-assembly of transcripts

We observed transcripts that had multiple ORFs that matched to the same gene with high significance (E-value<E-10). The possibility that such an occurrence is not an experimental artifact is low. Transcript C15259_G1_I1 is one such example, having two ORFs - ORF_36 (length = 144) and ORF_9 (length = 122), both of which match to the mitochondrial ATP-dependent Clp protease proteolytic subunit 2 34 (GenBank: CAN64666.1) from Vitis vinifera with E-values of 6E-92 and 7E-45, respectively. Figure 3 shows the alignment of these two ORFs to the Vitis vinifera protein indicated the possible site of the sequencing error or transcript misassembly. This aspect of the YeATS methodology can be used to estimate the sequencing and transcript assembly error rate. For example, in the current transcriptome of the walnut TZ, we found a 5% (1200 out of 24,000) error rate.

Error detection in sequencing or transcript assembly by YeATS.

Transcript C15259_G1_I1 has two ORFs - 9 and 36 - both of which match to the mitochondrial ATP-dependent Clp protease proteolytic subunit 2, mitochondrial (GenBank: CAN64666.1) from Vitis vinifera with E-values of 6E-92 and 7E-45, respectively. It is likely that the error occurred near the amino acid sequence ‘SAG’ marked in the figure. The current transcriptome of the walnut TZ had a 5% (1200 out of 24,000) error rate for this class of error.

 Long repeat within the same transcript

A small number of transcripts had long repeats (on the reverse strand), as identified by transcripts that had multiple identical ORFs. For example, transcript C50369_G5_I2 has two ORFs (length = 143) that matched to an uncharacterized protein (Uniprot id: XP_009362671, E-value= 4e-13). These ORFs were located on the reverse strand, and were exactly the same ( Figure 4). There were only 8 such cases.

Erroneous transcripts with an exact long repeat (on the reverse strand).

Transcript C50369_G5_I2 had an ORF (length = 143, Uniprot id: XP_009362671, uncharacterized protein), with an exact match on the reverse strand. There were only eight such cases, and they could be manually corrected.

 Merging transcripts

About ~200 transcripts have been merged using conservative metrics by YeATS (see Methods, list.merge in Supporting information). For example, transcripts C55368_G1_I3 and C55368_G2_I1 were merged based on a stretch of 12 amino acids (NFDENRGALNSH) ( Figure 5). The indicated single nucleotide difference might be the reason for the failure of the assembly program to merge these two transcripts. Transcript C55368_G1_I3 had two exact repeats of this stretch, which is a likely assembly error.

Transcripts that could be merged.

( a) Transcripts C55368_G1_I3 and C55368_G2_I1 could be merged based on a stretch of 12 amino acids (NFDENRGALNSH) obtained from their ORFs. ( b) The partial nucleotide sequences of these transcripts shows the repeat with only a single nucleotide difference. The indicated single nucleotide difference may explain the failure of the assembly program to merge these two transcripts. Interestingly, the transcript C55368_G1_I3 had two exact repeats of this stretch at the end which may have contributed to the failure of the assembly program to merge these transcripts.

 Identification of transcripts encoding multiple genes.

These ORFS belong to the same transcript, and have significant matches to different proteins. ( a) Genes on the reverse strand, having no overlap - clathrin light chain (value=3E-126) and a leucine repeat rich receptor-like serine/threonine protein kinase (E-value=0). ( b) Genes on the same strand, having no overlap - RING/U-box superfamily protein (E-value=7E-149) and a homeodomain-like superfamily protein isoform (E-value=0).

 Single transcripts with two ORFs

Some transcripts were associated with multiple ORFs with distinct significant matches in the ‘nr’ database. We demonstrate this for the transcript C8909_G1_I1, which had two ORFs - ORF_104 (length = 331) and ORF_45 (length = 390) which matched to a clathrin light chain 35 (Uniprot id:XP_006481016.1, E-value=3E-126) and a leucine repeat rich receptor-like serine/threonine protein kinase 36 (Uniprot id: XP_007026739.1, E-value=0), respectively. These ORFs were on opposite strands, and did not overlap. It was not possible to ascertain which was the correct gene product, and it is a distinct possibility that both strands were transcribed 37 . A slightly different situation arose when both the ORFs were on the same strand 38 , as in the case of the transcript C54995_G6_I2. For example, in transcript C54995_G6_I2, there were two ORFs - ORF_157 (length = 464) and ORF_231 (length = 543) that matched to a RING/U-box superfamily protein 39 (Uniprot id: XP_007042454.1, E-value=7E-149) and a homeodomain-like superfamily protein isoform 40 (Uniprot id: XP_007030696.1, E-value=0), respectively. Both of these proteins were on the same (reverse) strand of the transcript. These transcripts are candidates for chimeric 41 or fusion 42 genes, since the ribosome is known to bypass small nucleotide stretches separating two ORFs 43 .

 Highly transcribed genes

Table 1 shows the transcripts with the highest counts. Interestingly, the most abundant transcript had no homologous counterpart in the full BLAST ‘nr’ or ‘nt’ database (GenBank accession: KT023102). A proline-rich protein (PRP), a part of the protein superfamily of cell wall proteins consisting of extensins and nodulins, was found to have the second most abundant transcript 23, 44 . Proline comprises 19% of the amino acids in the ORF of this transcript. PRPs are found as structural proteins in wood, and it was hypothesized that these proteins occur in the xylem cell walls during ligniflication, and influence the properties of wood 45 . PRPs were associated with carrot storage root formation 46 , were wound and auxin inducible 46 and implicated in cell elongation 47 . PRPs are also an integral component of saliva responsible for the precipitation of antinutritive and toxic polyphenols by forming complexes 48 . Two DNAJ/HSP40 chaperone proteins, which are involved in proper protein folding, transport and stress response, showed high transcriptional levels 28 . Two DNAJ/HSP40 chaperone homologs (GenBank accession id: BI677935 and BI642398) were shown to be differentially expressed during summer at the sapwood/heartwood TZ of black locust 49 . The transcription levels of dehydrin-related proteins were shown to be seasonally regulated in the wood of deciduous trees 26, 50 . However, this dehydrin protein is homologous to a 24kDa dehydrin (Uniprot id: AGC51777) from Jatropha manihot, a drought resistant plant 51 , unlike the ~100kDa proteins investigated in 26 . Senescence-associated proteins, and the related tetraspanins, were also highly transcribed 27 . One highly expressed transcript was homologous to a protein that is yet to be characterized.

A sample of highly transcribed genes with high normalized counts (NC).

There are several highly transcribed genes in the representative sample of the transcriptome from the tissue at the heartwood/sapwood transition zone (TZ) in black walnut that did not have any significant homologs (NSL) in the complete ‘nr’ or ‘nt’ database. For the ‘nr’ database, we use the three longest ORFs as query. The significance of dehydrins, senescence-associated and DNAJ proteins can be observed through their transcription abundance.

ID NC Description E-value
C52369_G2_I1 43040 NSL (putative extensin based on amino acid composition) -
C51134_G2_I2 15200 ref|XP_008224364.1|PREDICTED: extensin-like [ Prunus mume] 1e-08
C40830_G1_I1 14169 ref|XP_006365673.1|dnaJ protein homolog isoform X2 [ Solanum tuberosum] 0
C46581_G1_I1 10651 PREDICTED: Probable zinc transporter protein [ Phoenix dactylifera] 8e-09
C51134_G2_I3 10631 emb|CAN59948.1|hypothetical protein VITISV_043422 [ Vitis vinifera] 6e-09
C44353_G2_I1 7769 gb|AGC51777.1|dehydrin protein [ Manihot esculenta] 6e-09
C44353_G1_I1 6652 gb|AAF01465.2|AF190474_1 bdn1 [ Paraboea crassifolia] 2e-19
C43130_G3_I1 6601 gb|KEH16988.1 |j senescence-associated protein, putative [ Medicago truncatula] 2e-129
C44922_G1_I1 5584 ref|XP_008363477.1|tetraspanin-3-like [ Malus domestica] 2e-169
C40830_G1_I2 5113 ref|XP_007010484.1|DNAJ [ Theobroma cacao] 0
Finding genes

We demonstrated the (iterative) gene finding methodology in YeATS on a transcription factor that has an AP2 DNA binding motif (RAP2.6L in Aradidopsis, At5g13330) 52 . This protein showed differential tissue specific expression, and is likely to be involved in plant developmental processes and stress response 53 . Recently, the sequence of a homolog of RAP2.6L was deduced (Uniprot id: C1KH72, JnRap2) from an EST sequence isolated from tissue at the heartwood/sapwood TZ in black walnut ( Juglans nigra L.), and its role in the integration of ethylene and jasmonate signals in the xylem and other tissues was established 54, 55 . Using the sequence of JnRap2, we probed for other RAP2 genes in the TZ of walnut. We found three possible genes (C38523_G2_I1, C53728_G7_I1 and C53728_G7_I2) ( Figure 7). It was observed that C53728_G7_I2 was closest to the JnRap2 gene (97.4% identity, 98.2% similar), and is probably the same gene. C53728_G2_I1 was also significantly homologous to the JnRap2 gene (84.4% identity, 92.4% similar), and it appears to be an allelic or splice variant, a conflict that can be resolved after the publication of the complete walnut genome. Raw counts (see Supporting information) demonstrated that the transcript C38523_G2_I1 had negligible expression levels in TZ, corroborating the previous detection of only one RAP2 protein in 54.

Finding genes from a template sequence.

Multiple sequence alignment of possible genes for a transcription factor that had a AP2 DNA binding motif compared to JnRap2, which was deduced from an EST sequence obtained from tissue at the heartwood/sapwood transition zone in black walnut.

 Transcripts with no significant matches in the ‘nr’ database - possible long non-coding RNA genes?

The top three ORFs of ~600 transcripts had no match in the BLAST ‘nr’ database. Although these may be unique genes, another possibility that must be considered is that these are non-coding RNA genes 2 . The nucleotide sequences of these 600 transcripts were BLAST’ed to the database of noncoding RNAs in Arabidopsis 22 . Three matches were identified: C52424_G5_I11, C52424_G5_I4 and C53565_G3_I1. Both C52424_G5_I11 and C52424_G5_I4 are homologous to CR20, a cytokinin-repressed gene in excised cotyledons of cucumber, hypothesized to be non-coding RNA 56 . Analogous to the current work, the CR20 gene had alternate splicing 56 . C53565_G3_I1 had a 100% match to the Aradidopsis locus ATMG01380, a mitochondrial 5S ribosomal RNA, which is a component of the 50S large subunit of mitochondrial ribosome 57 .

 Discussion

High-throughput mRNA sequencing (RNA-Seq) has revolutionized the field of transcript discovery, providing several advantages over traditional methods 7, 8 . Following isolation and fragmentation of RNA and subsequent generation of cDNA libraries, a high-throughput sequencing platform is selected to generate short reads 58 . Reconstruction of transcripts from these short reads (assembly) may be performed using a reference genome or de novo algorithms 15– 18, 21, 59 . Sequencing biases, variable coverage, sequencing errors, alternate splicing and repeat sequences are some of the challenges faced by these assemblers 14, 60 .

Several post assembly computational tools provide further curation of transcripts resulting from the assemblers. The curation step involves identifying redundancies 19, 20 , finding coding regions 61 , annotating the transcripts ( https://transdecoder.github.io/) and detecting inaccuracies by aligning the transcripts to the genome 62 . In the current work, we present an integrated workflow for RNA-seq analysis (YeATS). YeATS includes most features of the tools mentioned above. Additionally, YeATS delivers several capabilities absent in these tools. A comprehensive BLAST analysis of the top three open reading frames of each transcript enables the identification of erroneous transcripts arising out of sequencing or assembly errors. These erroneous transcripts can be classified as: a) transcripts that have not been merged, b) transcripts that result in broken ORFs and c) transcripts that have long improbable repeats. Finally, YeATS provides annotation of the genes, enumerates homologous genes based on a template sequence and specified similarity threshold and identifies transcripts with multiple ORFs. The ribosome is known to bypass small nucleotide stretches separating two ORFs 43 . These are rare events, however, and thus unlikely to apply to the ~1200 transcripts that have broken ORFs pointing to the same gene 63 . Transcripts having multiple ORFs on the same strand are good candidates for chimeric 41 or fusion 42 genes dependent on ribosome bypassing.

The current work reveals and corroborates several aspects of the biology of hardwood trees. Probably, the most interesting is the detection of a highly transcribed gene (C52369_G2_I1) with no known homologs in the complete protein and nucleotide BLAST database, or significant matches in a database of long non-coding RNA genes 22 . If indeed the longest ORF of this transcript encodes a protein, it is 143 amino acids long, and is leucine (18%), histidine (13%) and valine (10%) rich ( Figure 8). Although it is likely that this is a protein with leucine rich repeats, these proteins are typically larger proteins 64 . The regulatory stimuli of extensins are different for monocots (which also have different amino acid composition) and dicots 23 . A significant presence of extensin-like proteins in the cell wall of both developing and mature xylem (wood) have been reported for pine 45, 65 . The publication of the walnut genome will aid the characterization of these genes by elucidating its promoter sequences.

Percentage amino acid composition of the two most highly transcribed genes.

C52369_G2_I1 has a high percentage of leucine, histidine and valine, and is a putative extensin. C51134_G2_I2 is proline and lysine rich, and is homologous to an extensin and nodulin.

Well characterized proteins like proline-rich proteins 25, 45 , dehydrins 26 , senescence-associated proteins 27 and DNAJ/HSP40 chaperone 49 proteins were also abundant in the transcriptome. While Arabidopsis supports secondary growth, it fails to accumulate wood; it is therefore interesting to identify highly transcribed genes that are missing in the Arabidopsis proteome ( Table 2). The DNAJ/HSP40 chaperone, dehydrins and tetraspanin proteins are found in the Arabidopsis proteome (TAIR10_pep_20101214 66 ), while the putative extensin, the proline-rich protein, a probable zinc transporter protein, an uncharacterized protein and senescence-associated protein appear to be unique to the walnut proteome.

Identifying highly transcribed genes that are not present in the <italic toggle="yes">Arabidopsis</italic> proteome.

The wood quality of walnut and Arabidopsis are quite different. It is informative to identify genes (proteins) that are absent in Aradidopsis, since they are likely to be responsible for the differences. The DNAJ/HSP40 chaperone, dehydrins and tetraspanin proteins are found in the Arabidopsis proteome, while the putative extensin, the proline-rich protein, a probable zinc transporter protein, an uncharacterized protein and senescence-associated protein appear to be unique to the walnut proteome.

TRS Arabidopsis Id Description E-value Significant?
C52369_G2_I1 AT5G04990.1 SUN1, ATSUN1 | SAD1/UNC-84 domain protein 0.75
C51134_G2_I2 AT3G18440.1 AtALMT9, ALMT9 | aluminum-activated malat 0.046
C40830_G1_I1 AT5G22060.1 ATJ2, J2 | DNAJ homologue 2 | chr5:730379 0 Y
C46581_G1_I1 AT5G51930.1 Glucose-methanol-choline (GMC) oxidore 8.1
C51134_G2_I3 AT1G79090.2 FUNCTIONS IN: molecular function unkno 1.3
C44353_G2_I1 AT1G76180.2 ERD14 Dehydrin family protein | chr1:28 1e-05 Y
C44353_G1_I1 AT1G20450.2 LTI29, LTI45, ERD10 | Dehydrin family pro 1e-07 Y
C43130_G3_I1 AT1G72110.1 O-acyltransferase (WSD1-like) family p 1.7
C44922_G1_I1 AT3G45600.1 TET3 | tetraspanin3 | chr3:16733973–16735 8e-156 Y
C40830_G1_I2 AT3G44110.1 ATJ3, ATJ | DNAJ homologue 3 | chr3:15869 1e-179 Y

Also, we corroborated the presence of a transcription factor that has a AP2 DNA binding motif 52, 54 , and identify additional splice/allelic variants with similar transcriptional levels. Once again, the knowledge of the walnut genome would enable a more profound understanding of such genes.

 Conclusions

In summary, the current work elucidates an integrated workflow for RNA-seq analysis with several innovative features for identifying and correcting erroneously assembled transcripts. We demonstrated this workflow by characterizing the transcriptome of the tissue at the heartwood /sapwood TZ in black walnut.

 Data availability

The data referenced by this article are under copyright with the following copyright statement: Copyright: � 2015 Chakraborty S et al.

Data associated with the article are available under the terms of the Creative Commons Zero "No rights reserved" data waiver (CC0 1.0 Public domain dedication).

F1000Research: Dataset 1. YeATS Dataset, 10.5256/f1000research.6617.d49730 67

Software availability Latest source code

https://github.com/sanchak/YEATSCODE

Archived source code as at the time of publication

http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18382

Software license

GNU General Public License version 3.0 (GPLv3)

 Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Mary Lou Mendum for her inputs in preparing the manuscript.

 Supplementary figure Pictoral depiction of ‘Begin’ and ‘End’ database.

The contents of the ‘Begin’ and ‘End’ databases are represented along with the shared amino acid residues at the 3’ and 5’ ends, respectively. The ‘merge5’ command identified the String1 pair in the ‘Begin’ and ‘End’ databases due to the shared sequence ‘abcde’. The ‘merge5’ command failed to identify the String2 pair since six residues are shared. The ‘merge6’ command, however, will recognize String2 in the ‘Begin’ and ‘End’ databases, but would fail to recognize pairs that shared seven or more residues at the 3’ and 5’ ‘End’.

 Crick F : Central dogma of molecular biology. Nature. 1970;227(5258):561–563. 4913914 10.1038/227561a0 Mattick JS Makunin IV : Non-coding RNA. Hum Mol Genet. 2006;15(Spec No 1):R17–R29. 16651366 10.1093/hmg/ddl046 Kakumanu A Ambavaram MM Klumas C : Effects of drought on gene expression in maize reproductive and leaf meristem tissue revealed by RNA-seq. Plant Physiol. 2012;160(2):846–867. 22837360 10.1104/pp.112.200444 3461560 Costa V Aprile M Esposito R : RNA-Seq and human complex diseases: recent accomplishments and future perspectives. Eur J Hum Genet. 2013;21(2):134–142. 22739340 10.1038/ejhg.2012.129 3548270 Clark TA Sugnet CW Ares M Jr : Genomewide analysis of mRNA processing in yeast using splicing-specific microarrays. Science. 2002;296(5569):907–910. 11988574 10.1126/science.1069415 Kodzius R Kojima M Nishiyori H : CAGE: cap analysis of gene expression. Nat Methods. 2006;3(3):211–222. 16489339 10.1038/nmeth0306-211 Wang Z Gerstein M Snyder M : RNA-seq: a revolutionary tool for transcriptomics. Nat Rev Genet. 2009;10(1):57–63. 19015660 10.1038/nrg2484 2949280 Flintoft L : Transcriptomics: digging deep with RNA-seq. Nature Reviews Genetics. 2008;9(8):568. 10.1038/nrg2423 Trapnell C Pachter L Salzberg SL : TopHat: discovering splice junctions with RNA-seq. Bioinformatics. 25(9):1105–1111. 19289445 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp120 2672628 Trapnell C Roberts A Goff L : Differential gene and transcript expression analysis of RNA-seq experiments with TopHat and Cufflinks. Nat Protoc. 2012;7(3):562–578. 22383036 10.1038/nprot.2012.016 3334321 Wang L Feng Z Wang X : DEGseq: an R package for identifying differentially expressed genes from RNA-seq data. Bioinformatics. 2010;26(1):136–138. 19855105 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp612 Lohse M Bolger AM Nagel A : Robi NA: a user-friendly, integrated software solution for RNA-seq-based transcriptomics. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40(Web Server issue):W622-7. 22684630 10.1093/nar/gks540 3394330 Chang Z Li G Liu J : Bridger: a new framework for de novo transcriptome assembly using RNA-seq data. Genome Biol. 2015;16(1):30. 25723335 10.1186/s13059-015-0596-2 4342890 Grabherr MG Haas BJ Yassour M : Full-length transcriptome assembly from RNA-Seq data without a reference genome. Nat Biotechnol. 2011;29(7):644–652. 21572440 10.1038/nbt.1883 3571712 Chu HT Hsiao WW Chen JC : EBARDenovo: highly accurate de novo assembly of RNA-seq with efficient chimera-detection. Bioinformatics. 2013;29(8):1004–1010. 23457040 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt092 Schulz MH Zerbino DR Vingron M : Oases: robust de novo RNA-seq assembly across the dynamic range of expression levels. Bioinformatics. 2012;28(8):1086–1092. 22368243 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts094 3324515 Chang Z Li G Liu J : Bridger: a new framework for de novo transcriptome assembly using RNA-seq data. Genome Biol. 2015;16(1):30. 25723335 10.1186/s13059-015-0596-2 4342890 Simpson JT Wong K Jackman JD : ABySS: a parallel assembler for short read sequence data. Genome Res. 2009;19(6):1117–1123. 19251739 10.1101/gr.089532.108 2694472 Fu L Niu B Zhu Z : CD-HIT: accelerated for clustering the next-generation sequencing data. Bioinformatics. 2012;28(23):3150–3152. 23060610 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts565 3516142 Mbandi SK Hesse U van Heusden P : Inferring bona fide transfrags in RNA-seq derived-transcriptome assemblies of non-model organisms. BMC Bioinformatics. 2015;16(1):58. 25880035 10.1186/s12859-015-0492-5 4344733 Zerbino DR Birney E : Velvet: algorithms for de novo short read assembly using de bruijn graphs. Genome Res. 2008;18(5):821–829. 18349386 10.1101/gr.074492.107 2336801 Xie C Yuan J Li H : NONCODEv4: exploring the world of long non-coding RNA genes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014;42(Database issue):D98–D103. 24285305 10.1093/nar/gkt1222 3965073 Showalter AM : Structure and function of plant cell wall proteins. Plant Cell. 1993;5(1):9–23. 8439747 10.1105/tpc.5.1.9 160246 Plomion C Leprovost G Stokes A : Wood formation in trees. Plant Physiol. 2001;127(4):1513–1523. 11743096 10.1104/pp.010816 1540185 Williamson MP : The structure and function of proline-rich regions in proteins. Biochem J. 1994;297(Pt 2):249–60. 8297327 1137821 Sauter JJ Westphal S Wisniewski M : Immunological identification of dehydrin-related proteins in the wood of five species of Populus and in Salix caprea L. J Plant Physiol. 1999;154(5-6):781–788. 10.1016/S0176-1617(99)80258-2 Olmos E Reiss B Dekker K : The ekeko mutant demonstrates a role for tetraspanin-like protein in plant development. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2003;310(4):1054–1061. 14559222 10.1016/j.bbrc.2003.09.122 Bekh-Ochir D Shimada S Yamagami A : A novel mitochondrial DnaJ/Hsp40 family protein BIL2 promotes plant growth and resistance against environmental stress in brassinosteroid signaling. Planta. 2013;237(6):1509–1525. 23494613 10.1007/s00425-013-1859-3 3664749 Camacho C Madden T Ma N : BLAST Command Line Applications User Manual.2013. Reference Source Rice P Longden I Bleasby A : EMBOSS: the European Molecular Biology Open Software Suite. Trends Genet. 2000;16(6):276–277. 10827456 10.1016/S0168-9525(00)02024-2 Larkin MA Blackshields G Brown NP : Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0. Bioinformatics. 2007;23(21):2947–2948. 17846036 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm404 Gouy M Guindon S Gascuel O : SeaView version 4: A multiplatform graphical user interface for sequence alignment and phylogenetic tree building. Mol Biol Evol. 2010;27(2):221–224. 19854763 10.1093/molbev/msp259 Li H Durbin R : Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics. 2009;25(14):1754–1760. 19451168 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp324 2705234 Halperin T Zheng B Itzhaki H : Plant mitochondria contain proteolytic and regulatory subunits of the ATP-dependent Clp protease. Plant Mol Biol. 2001;45(4):461–468. 11352464 10.1023/A:1010677220323 Konopka CA Backues SK Bednarek SY : Dynamics of Arabidopsis dynamin-related protein 1C and a clathrin light chain at the plasma membrane. Plant Cell. 2008;20(5):1363–1380. 18502847 10.1105/tpc.108.059428 2438457 Afzal AJ Wood AJ Lightfoot DA : Plant receptor-like serine threonine kinases: roles in signaling and plant defense. Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2008;21(5):507–517. 18393610 10.1094/MPMI-21-5-0507 Geiduschek EP : An introduction to transcription and gene regulation. J Biol Chem. 2010;285(34):25885–25892. 20511220 10.1074/jbc.X110.143867 2923976 Borthakur D Basche M Buikema WJ : Expression, nucleotide sequence and mutational analysis of two open reading frames in the nif gene region of Anabaena sp. strain PCC7120. Mol Gen Genet. 1990;221(2):227–234. 2115111 10.1007/BF00261725 Deshaies RJ Joazeiro CA : RING domain E3 ubiquitin ligases. Annu Rev Biochem. 2009;78:399–434. 19489725 10.1146/annurev.biochem.78.101807.093809 Dubos C Stracke R Grotewold E : MYB transcription factors in Arabidopsis. Trends Plant Sci. 2010;15(10):573–581. 20674465 10.1016/j.tplants.2010.06.005 Fromm ME Morrish F Armstrong C : Inheritance and expression of chimeric genes in the progeny of transgenic maize plants. Biotechnology (N Y). 1990;8(9):833–839. 1366794 10.1038/nbt0990-833 Mitelman F Johansson B Mertens F : The impact of translocations and gene fusions on cancer causation. Nat Rev Cancer. 2007;7(4):233–245. 17361217 10.1038/nrc2091 Gallant J Bonthuis P Lindsley D : Evidence that the bypassing ribosome travels through the coding gap. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100(23):13430–13435. 14576279 10.1073/pnas.2233745100 263831 Kieliszewski MJ Lamport DT : Extensin: repetitive motifs, functional sites, post-translational codes, and phylogeny. Plant J. 1994;5(2):157–172. 8148875 10.1046/j.1365-313X.1994.05020157.x Bao W O’Malley DM Sederoff RR : Wood contains a cell-wall structural protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992;89(14):6604–6608. 11607306 49550 Ebener W Fowler TJ Suzuki H : Expression of DcPRP1 is linked to carrot storage root formation and is induced by wounding and auxin treatment. Plant Physiol. 1993;101(1):259–265. 8278498 10.1104/pp.101.1.259 158672 Dvoráková L Srba M Opatrny Z : Hybrid proline-rich proteins: novel players in plant cell elongation? Ann Bot. 2012;109(2):453–462. 22028464 10.1093/aob/mcr278 3268530 Baxter NJ Lilley TH Haslam E : Multiple interactions between polyphenols and a salivary proline-rich protein repeat result in complexation and precipitation. Biochemistry. 1997;36(18):5566–5577. 9154941 10.1021/bi9700328 Yang J Kamdem DP Keathley DE : Seasonal changes in gene expression at the sapwood-heartwood transition zone of black locust ( Robinia pseudoacacia) revealed by cDNA microarray analysis. Tree Physiol. 2004;24(4):461–474. 14757585 10.1093/treephys/24.4.461 Bassett CL Wisniewski ME Artlip TS : Comparative expression and transcript initiation of three peach dehydrin genes. Planta. 2009;230(1):107–118. 19360436 10.1007/s00425-009-0927-1 Maes WH Achtena WMJ Reubens B : Plant–water relationships and growth strategies of Jatropha curcas L. seedlings under different levels of drought stress. Journal of Arid Environments. 2009;73(10):877–884. 10.1016/j.jaridenv.2009.04.013 Okamuro JK Caster B Villarroel R : The AP2 domain of APETALA2 defines a large new family of DNA binding proteins in Arabidopsis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997;94(13):7076–7081. 9192694 10.1073/pnas.94.13.7076 21287 Krishnaswamy S Verma S Rahman MH : Functional characterization of four APETALA2-family genes ( RAP2.6, RAP2.6L, DREB19 and DREB26) in Arabidopsis. Plant Mol Biol. 2011;75(1–2):107–127. 21069430 10.1007/s11103-010-9711-7 Huang Z Zhao P Medina J : Roles of JnRAP2.6-like from the transition zone of black walnut in hormone signaling. PLoS One. 2013;8(11):e75857. 24265672 10.1371/journal.pone.0075857 3827044 Huang Z Tsai CJ Harding SA : A cross-species transcriptional profile analysis of heartwood formation in black walnut. Plant Mol Biol Report. 2010;28(2):222–230. 10.1007/s11105-009-0144-x Teramoto H Toyama T Takeba G : Noncoding RNA for CR20, a cytokinin-repressed gene of cucumber. Plant Mol Biol. 1996;32(5):797–808. 8980532 10.1007/BF00020478 Barciszewska MZ Szymanski M Erdmann VA : Structure and functions of 5s rRNA. Acta Biochim Pol. 2001;48(1):191–198. 11440169 Mardis ER : The impact of next-generation sequencing technology on genetics. Trends Genet. 2008;24(3):133–141. 18262675 10.1016/j.tig.2007.12.007 Haas BJ Papanicolaou A Yassour M : De novo transcript sequence reconstruction from RNA-seq using the Trinity platform for reference generation and analysis. Nat Protoc. 2013;8(8):1494–1512. 23845962 10.1038/nprot.2013.084 3875132 Roberts A Trapnell C Donaghey J : Improving RNA-seq expression estimates by correcting for fragment bias. Genome Biol. 2011;12(3):R22. 21410973 10.1186/gb-2011-12-3-r22 3129672 Arrial RT Togawa RC Brigido Mde M : Screening non-coding RNAs in transcriptomes from neglected species using PORTRAIT: case study of the pathogenic fungus paracoccidioides brasiliensis. BMC Bioinformatics. 2009;10:239. 19653905 10.1186/1471-2105-10-239 2731755 Zhao QY Wang Y Kong YM : Optimizing de novo transcriptome assembly from short-read RNA-seq data: a comparative study. BMC Bioinformatics. 2011;12(Suppl 14):S2. 22373417 10.1186/1471-2105-12-S14-S2 3287467 Herr AJ Gesteland RF Atkins JF : One protein from two open reading frames: mechanism of a 50 nt translational bypass. EMBO J. 2000;19(11):2671–2680. 10835364 10.1093/emboj/19.11.2671 212773 Jones DA Jones JDG : The role of leucine-rich repeat proteins in plant defences. Advances in botanical research. 1997;24:89–167. 10.1016/S0065-2296(08)60072-5 Allona I Quinn M Shoop E : Analysis of xylem formation in pine by cDNA sequencing. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998;95(16):9693–9698. 9689143 10.1073/pnas.95.16.9693 21401 Lamesch P Berardini TZ Li D : The Arabidopsis Information Resource (TAIR): improved gene annotation and new tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40(Database issue):D1202–D1210. 22140109 10.1093/nar/gkr1090 3245047 Chakraborty S Dandekar A Rao BJ : Dataset 1 in: YeATS - a tool suite for analyzing RNA-seq derived transcriptome identifies a highly transcribed putative extensin in heartwood/sapwood transition zone in black walnut. F1000Research. 2015. Data Source 10.5256/f1000research.7105.r10335 Reviewer response for version 1 Charoensawan Varodom 1 Referee Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand

Competing interests: No competing interests were disclosed.

 5 10 2015 Copyright: © 2015 Charoensawan V 2015 This is an open access peer review report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. recommendation approve-with-reservations

Chakraborty and coworkers proposed a new platform for analysing transcriptomic data from RNA-seq (YeATS -Yet Another Tool Suite for analyzing RNA-seq derived transcriptome). The key feature of the tool highlighted by the authors is error estimation and correction of assembled transcripts, which is performed by analysing ORFs predicted in each transcript and merging of transcripts. This error-filtering step is supposedly missing in most other existing tools to date. In addition, YeATS is able to perform other common RNA-seq analytic tasks, such as transcript abundance estimation.

From the point of view of a frequent user of NGS tools, rather than a developer, I can see that such a tool can be useful for improving transcript assembly and estimation, especially in organisms with no or poorly annotated genomes. However, there are a number of points that, to me, would improve the tool and the article, and it would be great if the authors could address/clarify. I would be happy to discuss this further if any of my comments are not clear.

It would be nice to include a performance evaluation of this new platform against existing tools, or with vs’ without the transcript error correction step by YeATS. One way to do this might be to take an existing RNA-seq dataset from a well-annotated organism such as Arabidopsis as a gold standard, and perform transcript assembly-estimation with and without correction by YeATS, and compare this to the transcript estimation using genomic information (e.g. by mapping reads to annotated transcriptomes/genomes). Does YeATS indeed improve the coverage and specificity of transcript estimation, for instance?

Along the same lines as the comment above, it would be useful if the authors could comment on the time and/or computing resources required to perform the correction step. Also, are the accuracy and computing resources dependent on the read lengths and/or sequencing platforms? (Or is it intended for Illumina reads as used in the example?).

Both the source code of YeATS and the data set used to illustrate its usage have been deposited and described at the end of the article. However, to this reviewer’s understanding, there is a set of Perl scripts deposited to Github, but it is still not clear to me how the tool/workflow should be implemented. The README does not seem to describe this. Could the author point out if there is already a guideline or documentation on how to use or integrate YeATS into an existing NGS workflow, if that already exists?

To my understanding, the input of YeATS is a set of assembled transcripts performed by other tools (e.g. Trinity). However, this step was not clearly described in the “ in vitro methods” section on Page 5. Instead, it seems the trimmed reads were directly aligned to J. regia transcriptome, which is somewhat confusing. Could you please clarify these?

The authors described the genes as highly “transcribed” in walnut (according to RNA-seq from this study?) that are not present in Arabiodopsis “proteome”. I found these to be slightly disconnected.          

  

Minor comments:

Figure 1: Is the “no” label between the boxes “Choose longest ORF” to “Gene annotation” necessary?

Page 3, 2 nd column, line 12: modify the text to “often in distinct regions of the transcript..” for clarity?

Page 5, 1 st column: There were ~24K “of” such transcripts

Figure 6’s legend: These ORF”s”

Reviewer Expertise:

NA

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard, however I have significant reservations, as outlined above.

Chakraborty Sandeep Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, India

Competing interests: No competing interests were disclosed.

 13 10 2015

We would like to thank you for taking the time to review this paper. Please find our responses below.

Chakraborty and coworkers proposed a new platform for analysing  transcriptomic data from RNA-seq (YeATS -Yet Another Tool Suite for analyzing RNA-seq derived transcriptome). The key feature of the tool highlighted by the authors is error estimation and correction of assembled transcripts, which is performed by analysing ORFs predicted in each transcript and merging of transcripts. This error-filtering step is supposedly missing in most other existing tools to date. In addition, YeATS is able to perform other common RNA-seq analytic tasks, such as transcript abundance estimation. From the point of view of a frequent user of NGS tools, rather than a developer, I can see that such a tool can be useful for improving transcript assembly and estimation, especially in organisms with no or poorly annotated genomes.

We appreciate your positive comments, and the possibility of value addition by the suggested methodology for existing NGS flows. We believe that this is the first attempt to associate the key information encoded by transcripts within ORFs to assess the accuracy of the assembly.

However, there are a number of points that, to me, would improve the tool and the article, and it would be great if the authors could address/clarify. I would be happy to discuss this further if any of my comments are not clear. It would be nice to include a performance evaluation of this new platform against existing tools, or with vs without the transcript error correction step by YeATS. One way to do this might be to take an existing RNA-seq dataset from a well-annotated organism such as Arabidopsis as a gold standard, and perform transcript assembly-estimation with and without correction by YeATS, and compare this to the transcript estimation using genomic information (e.g. by mapping reads to annotated transcriptomes/genomes). Does YeATS indeed improve the coverage and specificity of transcript estimation, for instance?

YeATS evaluates the accuracy of a transcriptome, but it is dependent on downstream tools (like MAKER) to use this for proper annotation of the genes. Thus, there are no existing tools that we could compare it with directly. A highly curated database like the Arabidopsis would not be a fair comparison, since it might have been annotated looking at several data points. However, we have extensively used the YeATS pipeline in processing the newly sequenced walnut genome (manuscript in review), and established erroneous assembly for several genes of interest. The transcriptome from several other tissues were included in the genome study. Interestingly, the 5% error estimate remained the same.

Along the same lines as the comment above, it would be useful if the authors could comment on the time and/or computing resources required to perform the correction step. Also, are the accuracy and computing resources dependent on the read lengths and/or sequencing platforms? (Or is it intended for Illumina reads as used in the example?).

The run times for most of the processing required in YeATS is a few hours on a 16 GB, 16-core machine, barring the search for homologies in the BLAST ’nr’ database, which can be time-intensive for a comprehensive search. This search can be significantly accelerated when the organism under investigation has well-annotated protein databases (as in the current case), much in lines of the newly introduced SMARTBLAST (http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/smartblast/), to run times under a day. Run times are dependent on the number of transcripts only, since the input to YeATS is an assembled transcriptome from a tool like Trinity. We have included this information in the manuscript.

Both the source code of YeATS and the data set used to illustrate its usage have been deposited and described at the end of the article. However, to this reviewers understanding, there is a set of Perl scripts deposited to Github, but it is still not clear to me how the tool/workflow should be implemented. The README does not seem to describe this. Could the author point out if there is already a guideline or documentation on how to use or integrate YeATS into an existing NGS workflow, if that already exists?

We have provided a README that describes the step in the YeATS workflow. However, this is not a push-button methodology, and goes through several steps, each of which is dependent on the previous step. Also, we have used custom schedulers, and thus several steps need to be adjusted depending on available resources. For example, the number of parallel jobs and the time-step between each submission is controlled through a custom-script. Thus, we have provided the key algorithms in detail in the paper for any developer to easily replicate our results. Furthermore, we are enhancing several of the programs based on more sophisticated algorithms (like using kmers, compression of data, etc). A proper release of this software will require some more time, but this manuscript was not meant to be a software article.

To my understanding, the input of YeATS is a set of assembled transcripts performed by other tools (e.g. Trinity). However, this step was not clearly described in the in vitro methods section on Page 5. Instead, it seems the trimmed reads were directly aligned to J. regia transcriptome, which is somewhat confusing. Could you please clarify these?

The input of YeATS is indeed a set of assembled transcripts performed by other tools like Trinity. We have modified the methods section to clarify this.

The authors described the genes as highly transcribed in walnut (according to RNA-seq from this study?) that are not present in Arabiodopsis proteome. I found these to be slightly disconnected.

We agree that these results are slightly disconnected to the general narrative of this paper, which focuses on post-assembly methodologies to assess the accuracy of assembled transcripts. However, these are interesting results that emerge during the analysis of the transcriptome of the transition zone of walnut, which has been obtained for the first time. And thus, though this may be of interest to researchers in the field, there is too little data to spin-off another paper to publish these findings.

Minor comments:

Figure 1: Is the no label between the boxes Choose longest ORF to Gene annotation necessary?

We have changed the label ’no’ to ’unannotated’. Long ORFs that do not have have significant matches are probably uncharacterized genes, and the genome could be annotated accordingly (although the annotation of novel genes is another problem not addressed in the current paper).

Page 3, 2nd column, line 12: modify the text to often in distinct regions of the transcript.. for clarity?

We have clarified this: ‘The ORFs map to different fragments of the same protein. This points to an error in the sequencing or the assembly, which breaks down the contiguous ORF into two fragments.’

Page 5, 1st column: There were 24K of such transcripts Figure 6s legend: These ORFs

We have made these modifications. Once again, we are thankful for your insightful comments, and hope to have addressed your concerns.