[version 2; peer review: 2 approved, 1 not approved]
AF and ZF: study design, data collection, data processing and statistical analysis, manuscript preparation; IK: study design, data collection; LM: data processing and statistical analysis; EN: data processing and statistical analysis, manuscript preparation.
In a cohort of patients hospitalized with acute heart failure (AHF) the prevalence of anemia and the existence of a correlation between anemia and the severity of the clinical picture were assessed.
Statistical analysis was reconsidered and more emphasis was placed on correlations with renal function. The main message of the article remained the same.
Anemia is relatively frequent in patients with heart failure (HF). In a population of patients with newly diagnosed HF the prevalence of anemia was 17%
The aim of this study was to assess a cohort of patients hospitalized with AHF for (1) the prevalence of anemia and (2) the existence of correlations parameters reflecting the severity of heart failure and the grade of anemia, with special accent on decreased renal function.
We collected data from 50 consecutive patients (34 men, 16 women, mean age 67.5 years) hospitalized with AHF (acute decompensated heart failure in 36 cases). At admission, all the patients signed the general consent form used at our institution, agreeing with anonymous data collection and usage for scientific purposes. Approval of the hospital ethical committee (permit number: 3865/01.03.2016) was obtained for data processing and publication. Exclusion criteria were: recent (<1 month) acute coronary syndrome, and advanced renal disease on hemodialysis. At admission and during hospital stay routine (part of usual care) clinical and paraclinical data were recorded in a dedicated database: demographic data, clinical diagnosis, triggering factors of decompensation, signs and symptoms at admission, ECG data, echocardiographic data, laboratory parameters at admission, and in-hospital treatment data. Anemia was defined as Hb<12 g/dL for women and Hb <13 g/dL for men. eGFR was estimated by the CKD-EPI equation.
Statistical analysis was performed with STATISTICA 5.0, using Fisher’s exact test for the comparison of discrete data, the Mann-Whitney U test for continuous parameters and the Spearman rank correlation for comparison analysis and multiple linear regression, to determine parameters influencing eGFR (α=0.05).
Please see legend.csv for a description of the data
21 patients (14 men, 7 women, mean age 69.6 years), representing 42% of the cohort, had anemia at admission. The most common form was renal anemia (10 patients), while 8 patients suffered of iron deficiency anemia. We did not find significant differences between the two groups of patients, with and without anemia, with regards to gender (p=1) and age (p=0.57). Also, there were no significant differences regarding the presence of atrial fibrillation (p=0.75), diabetes (p=1), ischemic heart disease (p=1), hypotension (systolic blood pressure <90 mmHg) at admission (p=0.34), tachycardia>100 b/min at admission (p=0.75), severe aortic stenosis (0.12), pulmonary hypertension (0.13), the level of eGFR (p=0.33), left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) (p=0.95) and need of high dose (>80 mg/day) loop diuretic (p=0.23) (
| Anemia | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Parameter | No (n=29) | Yes (n=21) | P |
| Age (years) | 66,06 ± 2,07 | 69,62 ± 2,48 | 0,45 |
| Gender (male/female) | 20/9 | 14/7 | 1 |
| Hemoglobin (g/L) | 14,06 ± 0,19 | 10,76 ± 0,25 | <0,001 |
| eGFR (mL/min) | 66,36 ± 4,55 | 60,21 ± 6,12 | 0,33 |
| LV ejection fraction (%) | 40 ± 3,10 | 40,71 ± 3,81 | 0,95 |
| Ischemic heart disease | 15 (51,7%) | 11 (52,4%) | 1 |
| Diabetes | 19 (65,5%) | 13 (61,9%) | 1 |
| Atrial fibrillation | 15 (52,3%) | 11 (51,7%) | 1 |
| Systolic blood pressure
|
6 (20,7%) | 7 (33,3%) | 0,34 |
| Tachycardia (>100 b/min) | 9 (31%) | 5 (23,8%) | 0,75 |
| Severe aorta stenosis | 6 (20,7%) | 9 (42,8%) | 0,12 |
| Pulmonary hypertension | 7 (26,9%) | 11 (52,4%) | 0,13 |
| Antiaggregant treatment | 2 (6,9%) | 0 (0%) | 0,5 |
| Anticoagulant treatment | 27 (93%) | 19 (90,4%) | 1 |
| Daily ≥ 80 mg furosemid | 21 (72,4%) | 11 (52,4%) | 0,23 |
We observed a significant positive correlation between eGFR and the ejection fraction (r=0,65, p=0,001) in patients with anemia, but not in those with normal hemoglobin levels (r=-0,13, p=0,48). In a multiple regression model, determining the eGFR quartiles, we found a significant effect of EF on eGFR (p=0,004).
There is general agreement that anemia is a good predictor of prognosis in patients with acute and chronic HF. Anemia is associated with increased mortality, however there are conflicted data whether this is an independent predictor or reflects the progression of HF and/or is related to the presence of more frequent comorbidities
In our cohort of patients the presence of anemia was not correlated with other factors related to AHF severity and prognosis. This fact suggests its independent role in influencing the clinical picture and prognosis. On the other hand, almost half of anemia patients suffered of chronic kidney disease, and this subgroup showed a significant association of low EF with low eGFR. Moreover, ejection fraction proved to have a significant effect on estimated glomerular filtration rate in a multiple regression model, suggesting that low EF in heart failure might cause the decrease of GFR, aggravating the chronic kidney disease and, consequently contributing to the development of renal anemia.
The data referenced by this article are under copyright with the following copyright statement: Copyright: � 2017 Frigy A et al.
Data associated with the article are available under the terms of the Creative Commons Zero "No rights reserved" data waiver (CC0 1.0 Public domain dedication).
Written informed consent for publication of their clinical details was obtained from the patients.
Reviewer Expertise:
NA
I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard.
As described by the authors, they have reconsidered their statistical analysis but the main message of the article remained the same. These changes do not address my concerns expressed regarding the first version of the article.
"The authors have raised an interesting question. However, they need to define a more specific study hypothesis and calculate the sample size needed for analyzing that hypothesis. The current study design and sample size does not allow for drawing any reliable conclusions."
Therefore, I am sorry to renew my concerns. I consider this study as valuable hypothesis-generating work. However, there are several reasons that should keep the authors from drawing the conclusions stated in the article:
The current work was not hypothesis-driven research Consequently, no sample size / power calculation was made Making multiple statistical analyses based on 21 patients with anemia will result in some positive findings/correlations (maybe just by chance) and many negative findings (maybe just because the sample size is dramatically inadequate).
At its current state, I cannot recommend to publish the revised version of the article. I could support publication if the findings were presented as hypothesis-generating but with the clear statement that the study lacks power for drawing valid conclusions.
Reviewer Expertise:
NA
I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to state that I do not consider it to be of an acceptable scientific standard, for reasons outlined above.
The authors for the revised paper from "A Frigy
They have now included the required data from the patients included in the cohort for the study. I suggest the acceptance of the paper.
Reviewer Expertise:
cardiovascular pharmacology, cardiac electrophysiology
I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard.
More or less acceptable. I would suggest adding some details about the general life quality of the patients.
Please give details about the general conditions of the patients including: i) data about other diseases (cardiac and not cardiac as well); ii) status when they arrived at the hospital and how was their status when leaving the hospital; was there post hospitalization care or not, and if yes what were the results.
Insufficiently short. Please supplement with information and comments about some comparative details of other studies in this field.
Reviewer Expertise:
NA
I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard, however I have significant reservations, as outlined above.
The authors have assessed the prevalence of anemia in a cohort of 50 patients hospitalized with acute heart failure (AHF), and also assessed the existence of a correlation between anemia and the severity of the clinical picture. They found anemia in 21/50 patients but no correlation of anemia with other factors related to severity and prognosis of AHF. They conclude that this finding is suggestive of an independent role of anemia in influencing the clinical picture and prognosis of AHF.
The study by Frigy
The authors need to define the study question more specifically: what is (are) the outcome(s) they are looking for in the population of patients with acute heart failure? Based on a specific study question and hypothesis, the authors need to perform a sample size calculation. It will be interesting to read the results of that adequately sized study.
The authors have raised an interesting question. However, they need to define a more specific study hypothesis and calculate the sample size needed for analyzing that hypothesis. The current study design and sample size does not allow for drawing any reliable conclusions.
Reviewer Expertise:
NA
I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to state that I do not consider it to be of an acceptable scientific standard, for reasons outlined above.
This article addresses the prevalence of anemia amongst patients hospitalized with acute heart failure (AHF) and the existence of a correlation between anemia and the severity of the clinical picture. The manuscript is well written, but I have some concerns on certain points. Below are more specific comments by section:
Introduction: More information about the purpose of the topic addressed would provide welcome context, i.e. the relevance of the study conducted. A bit more detail about anemia and acute heart failure would also be helpful in order to understand better the relevance of the potential correlation addressed; Methods: They may be some reservations concerning the data size: a small sample of data was used in order to conduct this study. On the other hand, more information regarding the methods used and how the study was specifically conducted would also be insightful; Discussion and conclusions: A poor discussion and conclusions are presented. Thereby, the results should be discussed in more detail, i.e. the results presented in Table 1. For instance, a more specific discussion could be done regarding the most relevant parameters presented in Table 1, i.e. parameters in patients with and without anemia.
Overall, I consider this study interesting but more information regarding certain topics seems undoubtedly needed in order to complete and clarify some crucial points addressed throughout this paper.
Reviewer Expertise:
NA
I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard, however I have significant reservations, as outlined above.