F1000Research F1000Research 2046-1402 F1000 Research Limited London, UK 10.12688/f1000research.15514.1 Research Article Articles Characteristics and management of ventricular shunt infections in children, 2000-2015: a single centre retrospective chart review

[version 1; peer review: 1 not approved]

 Feijen Iris C. Data Curation Formal Analysis Investigation Methodology Resources Software Visualization Writing – Original Draft Preparation Writing – Review & Editing 1 Rodrigues Charlene M.C. Conceptualization Formal Analysis Investigation Methodology Project Administration Supervision Writing – Original Draft Preparation Writing – Review & Editing https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0942-3707 1 Cowie Christopher J.A. Conceptualization Investigation Resources Writing – Review & Editing 2 Nicholson Claire Conceptualization Investigation Resources Writing – Review & Editing 2 Raza Muhammad Conceptualization Investigation Resources Writing – Review & Editing 3 Emonts Marieke Conceptualization Formal Analysis Investigation Methodology Project Administration Supervision Writing – Original Draft Preparation Writing – Review & Editing a 1 4 Department of Paediatric Immunology and Infectious Diseases, Great North Children’s Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, Northumberland, NE1 4LP, UK Department of Neurosurgery, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, Northumberland, NE1 4LP, UK Department of Microbiology, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, Northumberland, NE1 4LP, UK Institute of Cellular Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, Northumberland, NE1 7RU, UK marieke.emonts@newcastle.ac.uk

Equal contributors

No competing interests were disclosed.

 30 7 2018 2018 7 1158 18 7 2018 Copyright: © 2018 Feijen IC et al. 2018 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Background: Infections are a common and serious complication of ventricular shunts that can lead to significant mortality and morbidity. Treatment consists of surgical and antimicrobial therapy, but there is a lack of evidence regarding optimal management. We therefore aimed to analyse the current practice and patient outcomes within a large tertiary referral centre.

Methods: We identified cases of infection in ventriculoperitoneal shunts from January 2000 until April 2015 in our institution. All patients were under 18 years at the time of infection. Clinical, microbiological and radiological data were collected with the use of a standardised proforma. Non-parametric tests were used for statistical analysis.

Results: There were 92 episodes of infection in 65 patients. The most common microorganisms were coagulase-negative staphylococci (47%), followed by Staphylococcus aureus (16%). Surgical treatment included shunt externalisation (15%) and complete removal (67%). Antibiotics were given in 97% of the patients in addition to surgery. Vancomycin, linezolid, cefotaxime, meropenem and rifampicin were used most frequently. The median duration of antibiotic treatment was 18 days (IQR 14-25 days). Two patients died from consequences of a shunt infection and seven had recurrent infection.

Conclusions: It would be beneficial to develop a guideline for recognition and treatment of shunt infections. Complete removal of the shunt and placement of an EVD seems the safest surgical treatment. Empirical antibiotic treatment should be started as soon as possible. A combination of linezolid and ceftriaxone would be appropriate first line antibiotics, with meropenem as second line. Antibiotics can be rationalised once the CSF culture results are known.

 Ventriculopertioneal shunt infection Hydrocephalus children Staphylococcus aureus Coagulase-negative staphylococci Cerebrospinal fluid shunt The author(s) declared that no grants were involved in supporting this work. Introduction

Hydrocephalus is a common and serious neurosurgical condition. The incidence is estimated between 0.4-4 cases per 1000 births worldwide 1, 2 . In some cases there is a treatable underlying cause of hydrocephalus (e.g. a posterior fossa tumour) but in most cases cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) diversion is required. CSF diversion usually requires some kind of shunt, although endoscopic third ventriculostomy is an option in certain types of obstructive hydrocephalus. Different types of shunts are available, of which ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunts are most frequently used. Other types of shunts include; ventriculoatrial (VA), ventriculopleural and lumboperitoneal (LP) 2– 5 .

Shunt insertion procedures are not without risk and infection is a frequent complication 6, 7 . Rates of infection per shunt vary widely, between 3 and 13% 3, 6, 8– 12 . Overall shunt infection rate in the UK is estimated at 5.2% 7 . Shunt infections have a mortality of 10.1% and worse Glasgow Outcome Scale scores, as well as worse school performance in the long-term 13 . From a public health perspective, shunt infections are associated with major hospital costs, with one episode costing approximately £29,000 14 . Therefore, prevention or prompt recognition and treatment of infection are imperative.

There are recognised factors known to increase the risk of shunt infection. In general, younger and premature children have a higher risk due to immaturity of their immune system and differences in skin flora compared to older children 15 . Premature infants who have had shunt surgery before 40 weeks gestational age have the greatest risk of all ages (Hazard radio (HR): 4.72, 95% CI 1.71-13.06) 9, 10, 14, 16 . Children who have multiple shunt revision procedures, either because of shunt blockage, malfunction, fracture or infection are also at greater risk as with each revision, the cumulative risk rises 11 . There are technical aspects of shunt surgery that increase risk, including handling of the shunt system with sterile surgical gloves contaminated early in the procedure (HR 1.07, 95% CI 1.02-1.12, p=0.01). The risk is higher still if there is a post-operative CSF leak through the wound, allowing skin flora to access the shunt system (HR 19.16, 95% CI 6.96-52.91, P<0.0001) 4, 16 .

Recognition of shunt infections in children can be difficult as they present with a wide variety of non-specific symptoms such as fever, vomiting, drowsiness, headaches, irritability, seizures and abdominal pain 3, 10, 17 . Up to 90% of shunt infections occur within the first three to nine months after shunt insertion. During this period there should be a low threshold for investigating patients who display any of these symptoms 3, 4, 7, 12 .

The organisms most frequently identified are skin flora, with staphylococcal species accounting for up to 80% of shunt infections 9, 14, 18 . Staphylococcus epidermidis is the most frequent coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) 7, 12 . Other common organisms are Staphylococcus aureus (5-26%) and other CoNS (36.1-53%) 9– 11, 17, 19 . Gram-negative organisms are also frequent findings, accounting for up to 54% of infections in some series 20 . Gram-negative rods were identified in approximately 7–9% of infections 11, 17 .

Treatment of shunt infection requires complete removal of the device in combination with temporary drainage, unless infection is confined to the abdomen in which case there is a period of shunt externalisation before replacement 18, 20 . Early surgical intervention is especially important since staphylococci commonly form a biofilm after colonising an implant, making it more difficult for antibiotics to penetrate and eradicate infection 21 . Additionally, early and prolonged intravenous and/or intrathecal antibiotic therapy are needed to sterilise the CSF. It is recommended to wait until the cultures have been sterile for at least 72 hours before implanting a new shunt 5 . There is some evidence that in case of low-grade inflammation the patient can sometimes be treated with antibiotics alone, but success rates are reported to be low 3, 4, 13, 14 .

Optimal duration and choice of antibiotic treatment are unclear in the current literature. There is no correlation between recurrence of infection and the duration of antibiotic therapy given, suggesting that a shorter treatment course could be as effective as a longer one 22 . Due to the increasing concern of multidrug-resistant bacteria, the use of penicillin has largely been replaced by vancomycin 18 . Linezolid is a good alternative, effective against most Gram-positive microorganisms, including multidrug-resistant strains 23 . There are currently no randomized studies, large case series, recent prospective studies or guidelines regarding the treatment of ventricular shunt infections in children 14 .

 Study objectives

Given the severity of this condition and the lack of evidence-based management strategies, there is a need for evaluation of current practice to establish a standard of care. Therefore, this study aimed to retrospectively analyse the management of ventricular shunt infections in children in the regional referral centre for the North East of England, the Great North Children’s Hospital in Newcastle upon Tyne, UK. We aimed to describe the clinical presentation, diagnostic efficacy, as well as surgical and medical treatment regimens including antibiotic use. In addition, we hope to identify areas for improvement in clinical practice to reduce mortality, re-infection rates or neurological sequelae in these children.

 Methods Patient population

All children (≤18 years) diagnosed with shunt infections presenting to the Great North Children’s Hospital, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK over the last 15 years were included in this study. Only children with a permanent shunt device were included. This could either be a VP shunt, a VA shunt, a ventriculopleural shunt or a LP shunt. Patients who had the infection before the year 2000 were excluded from the study, as were patients who were over 18 years old at the time of infection. A shunt infection was defined as any patient coded as ‘shunt infection’ at discharge or any patient who received treatment for suspected shunt infection, with or without microbiological confirmation.

Patient lists were obtained from clinical coding department of the hospital. Using broad search terms ‘shunt infection’, ‘CSF infection’ and patients aged ≤18 years old, 708 possible patients were identified. After screening for eligibility with a digital archive for discharge and referral letters, using the criteria listed above, 65 patients were included in the study ( Figure 1).

Flowchart of patient inclusion and exclusion criteria for the study. Data collection

A proforma ( Supplementary File 1) was compiled including all relevant clinical, microbiological and radiological information. It was completed by medical staff using clinical records, laboratory (biochemistry and microbiology) results, radiology scans and reports, discharge and referral letters. Data was analysed using Microsoft Excel 2010. Statistical methods used were non-parametric.

 Current practice

Prior to this study, there was no standard protocol at this institution for the management of CSF shunt infections. It was common practice to give a single dose of cefuroxime at induction in theatre as prophylaxis prior to surgery for shunt insertion. Additionally, gentamicin was used occasionally to flush through the shunt system prior to implantation, depending upon surgeon preference. Antibiotics were not routinely given post-operatively for a first time shunt insertion without suspected infection. Shunt infections were managed on a case-by-case basis. Usually the shunt was removed completely and a new shunt inserted as soon as possible after CSF sterilisation. For the purposes of this study, CSF sterilisation was defined as the first negative CSF culture that remained negative in repeated cultures.

 Ethics and confidentiality

Ethical approval was not required as this was a quality improvement study. The Caldicott principles, a framework of good practice in the use of patient information, were adhered to throughout the study in agreement with local hospital policies. The Clinical Governance Department of the Trust provided Caldicott approval under ID no. 4251. All data were collected and stored securely on password protected hospital computers and all data were anonymised.

 Results Characteristics and risk factors of patient population

A total of 65 patients were included in this study, 55.4% were male (n=36, p=0.19), 46.1% were preterm, 33.8% were born at term and 20.0% unknown due to lack of clinical information. Three different types of shunt were used, VP shunts (n=61, 95.3%) were the most frequently used, two patients had LP shunts and one a VA shunt. Only one shunt was known to be antibiotic impregnated. The majority (n=49, 83.0%) had their first shunt before the age of one year. The median age at which patients received their first shunt was two months (IQR 1-6 months) ( Table 1).

Overview of patient and shunt characteristics.
Characteristics No. of patients (%) Characteristics No. of patients (%)
Sex Hydrocephalus secondary to
      male 36 (55)       intraventricular haemorrhage 19 (30)
Gestation       spina bifida 10 (16)
      <37 weeks 30 (46)       tumour 6 (9)
      >37 weeks 22 (34)       aqueductal stenosis 5 (8)
      unknown 13 (20)       meningitis 5 (8)
Age first shunt (years)       congenital hydrocephalus 3 (5)
      0 – 1 49 (83)       cyst 2 (3)
      1 – 2 1 (2)       Dandy Walker syndrome 2 (3)
      2 – 3 1 (2)       neonatal infection 2 (3)
      3 – 4 2 (3)       abscess 1 (2)
      4 – 5 1 (2)       benign intracranial hypertension 1 (2)
      > 5 5 (8)       megalocephaly 1 (2)
Type of shunt       subdural empyema 1 (2)
      ventriculoperitoneal 61(95)       subdural haematoma 1 (2)
      lumboperitoneal 2 (3)       trauma 1 (2)
      ventriculoatrial 1 (2)       unspecified hydrocephalus 4 (6)
      ventriculopleural 0 (0)
Diagnosis of infection

Of the 92 episodes, diagnosis relied on a positive CSF culture in 61 (66%) cases, a positive shunt culture in 8 (9%) cases and a positive wound culture in 3 (3%) cases. A further 8 (9%) episodes had negative cultures, but were diagnosed by white blood cell count in the CSF >5/mm 3. In the rest of the episodes (n=12, 13%) diagnosis was made solely on clinical data.

The median number of leukocytes in CSF was 46/mm 3. A blood culture was obtained in 75% (n=68) of episodes, of which only 3% (n=2) had a positive result. In 43% (n=39) of episodes a CT scan was performed to exclude shunt blockage. In only 5% (n=2) of these episodes the scan was suggestive of infection. Ventriculitis may be seen as irregular enhancement of the ependymal lining of the ventricles. For three of the scans no final report was available.

 Prevention of shunt infections

Of the 65 patients, 42 (64.6%) received prophylactic antibiotics prior to first shunt insertion. The other 23 patients either did not receive antibiotics or had incomplete or missing documentation. Of the patients who received a single dose of antibiotics (n=35), the majority received prophylactic cefuroxime (n=23, 65.7%). Other antibiotics included; vancomycin (n=4. 11.4%), flucloxacillin (n=4, 11.4%), cefotaxime (n=2, 5.7and benzylpenicillin (n=2, 5.7%).

 Presentation to hospital

The median age at the first infection was 36 months (IQR 4-100 months) and 40.6% (n=26) had their first infection in the first year of life. Patients presented with a variety of non-specific symptoms. Of all the episodes of infection for which information was available (n=91), 61 (67.0%) presented with fever. Other common symptoms were irritability (n=27, 29.7%), vomiting (n=26, 28.6%), cutaneous manifestations, for example rashes or erythema over the shunt tract, (n=21, 23.1%) and abdominal pain (n=17, 18.7%). Infections with S. aureus presented more often with cutaneous manifestations (n=5, 14%), headache (n=3, 9%) and diarrhoea, (n=3, 9%), while CoNS infections presented more often with irritability (n=13, 18%) ( Figure 2).

Distribution of symptoms documented at presentation of patients who were later diagnosed with shunt infections. Medical and surgical management

Information regarding treatment regimens was available for 91 episodes. A total of 97 microorganisms could be identified in 73 (80.2%) of the episodes, with 31 different microorganisms causing shunt infection ( Figure 3). The two largest groups were human skin flora, CoNS (n=46, 47.4%) and S. aureus (n=16, 16.5%). In 19.8% (n=18) of episodes no microorganisms were identified. Eighty-eight patients (96.7%) received antibiotic treatment. Complete information about the treatment course could be collected from 62 episodes from 45 patients. The median number of days these patients received antibiotics per episode was 18 days (IQR 14-25 days). The shortest period was one day and the longest 52 days. Most patients received more than one type of antibiotic during their treatment course. Only 4.8% (n=3) of episodes were treated with one antibiotic. The median number of different antibiotics received per episode was three, with the maximum of nine in one patient ( Table 2).

Microorganisms identified from culture of CSF, shunt or wound and treated as the causative agent for ventriculoperitoneal shunt infection. Antibiotic management for 62 episodes of infection.
Median IQR Min Max
Duration of antibiotics (days) 18 14-25 1 52
Antibiotics used per infection (n) 3 3-5 1 9
Time from diagnosis to CSF sterilisation (days) 4 2-10 1 28
Time from sterilisation to shunt reinsertion (days) 11 5-17 1 56

In total 25 different types of antibiotics were used to treat 88 episodes. Vancomycin was used most frequently, in 58.0% (n=51) of episodes. Furthermore, linezolid was used in 48.9% (n=43), cefotaxime in 43.2% (n=38), meropenem in 38.6% (n=34) and rifampicin in 33.0% (n=29). Other antibiotics were used in less than 20% of the episodes ( Figure 4). A schematic representation of the antibiotic treatment per patient was generated, which showed no overall trends in antibiotic use. Table 3 and Table 4 show the different combinations of antibiotics used for five days or more in S. aureus and CoNS infections respectively to give a clearer view of overall use. Empirical use of antibiotics at the start of treatment is highlighted for comparison. We have limited this information to CoNS and S. aureus infections due to a wide variation in other pathogens (n= 1-2 maximum).

Antibiotics used in the treatment of shunt infections, shown as the frequency of a given antibiotic used at any point in the treatment course, either as monotherapy or as part of combined therapy. Combinations of antibiotics used ≥5 days in 10 <italic toggle="yes">Staphylococcus aureus</italic> infections.
Vanc Line Rifa Fluc Mero Cotr Cefo Cefu Metr Teic Ceft
1 x x
2 x x x x
3 x x x
4 x x x x x
5 x x x
6 x x x
7 x x
8 x x
9 x x x
10 x

X are antibiotics used for ≥ 5 days overall, highlighted are antibiotics were started empirically at diagnosis.

Vanc = vancomycin, Line = linezolid, Rifa = rifampicin, Fluc = flucloxacillin, Mero = meropenem, Cotr = co-trimoxazole, Cefo = cefotaxime, Cefu = cefuroxime, Metr =metronidazole, Teic = teicoplanin, Ceft =ceftriaxone

 Combinations of antibiotics used ≥5 days in 26 coagulase-negative staphylococcal infections.
Vanc Line Rifa Fluc Mero Cotr Cefo Cefu Cipr Metr Teic Ceft Cefa Cefta Gent
1 x x
2 x x
3 x x
4 x x x x
5 x x x
6 x x x x
7 x x x
8 x x x
9 x x x
10 x x x x
11 x x
12 x x
13 x x
14 x x
15 x x
16 x x x
17 x x
18 x x
19 x x
20 x x
21 x x x
22 x x
23 x x x
24 x x x
25 x
26 x

X are antibiotics used for ≥5 days overall, highlighted are antibiotics were started empirically at diagnosis.

Vanc = vancomycin, Line = linezolid, Rifa = rifampicin, Fluc = flucloxacillin, Mero = meropenem, Cotr = co-trimoxazole, Cefo = cefotaxime, Cefu = cefuroxime, Cipr = ciprofloxacin, Metr = metronidazole, Teic = teicoplanin, Ceft = ceftriaxone, Cefa = cefalexin, Cefta = ceftazidime, Gent = gentamicin

Regarding surgical management, 67.0% (n=61) had shunt removal, 15.4% (n=14) had shunt externalisation and 26.4% (n=24) were treated without any surgical intervention. Date of sterilisation of the CSF was available for 57 episodes. The time between infection of the shunt and sterilisation of the CSF varied and was between 1 and 28 days. The median was 4 days (IQR 2-10 days). The median number of days between sterilisation of the CSF and insertion of a new shunt was 11 days (IQR 5-17 days).

Recurrent infections occurred in 18/64 patients (28.1%). In seven of these episodes the reinfection was with the same microorganism within 90 days of the previous infection. All seven patients were treated with appropriate antibiotics for the first infection and six of them had sterilised CSF after treatment. Three of the patients had no surgery, one had a shunt externalisation and three had shunt removal for this episode of infection.

Among these 92 infections in 65 patients, a total of 146 new shunts were implanted and a total of 178 shunts were revised, of which 120 revisions were not due to infection, but predominantly due to shunt blockage. Most of the infections took place shortly after insertion or revision of the shunt. 58.8% (n=47) took place within 100 days after insertion of a shunt and 70.4% (n=57) within 100 days of last contact with the shunt (either placement or revision) ( Figure 5). 67.5% (n=54) of infections took place within nine months after placement of a new shunt and 58.8% (n=47) within three months. 74.1% (n=60) of the infections took place within nine months of last contact with the shunt and 70.4% (n=57) within three months. There was a significant positive correlation between the number of infections and shunts, Spearman rho 0.247 (p=0.05) and a non-significant correlation between the number of infections and revisions, Spearman rho 0.153 (p=0.23).

Frequency of shunt infections occurring by week after either placement of shunt or last surgical contact in the first 100 days. Outcome of shunt infection

From January 2000 until May 2015 all-cause mortality was 10.8% (n=7) and shunt infection related mortality was 3.1% (n=2).

 Discussion

Infants and children born prematurely are known to have a higher risk of shunt infection 9, 10, 14, 16 . In our population 46% of the patients were born prematurely and 41% had the first infection before the age of one year. This reaffirms that in these groups the suspicion of a shunt infection should be promptly investigated and treated. Gender does not seem to be a risk factor for developing a shunt infection 11, 13, 16 and there was no difference between the number of males and females infected (55% male, p=0.19) in our study. In our population 68% of infections occurred within nine months of shunt insertion and 59% within three months. This suggests that the shorter the period after shunt insertion, the higher the suspicion of an infection. Our percentages are lower than those reported in the literature; 90% within three to nine months 4, 7, 12 , which may suggest fewer episodes might be attributed to microbial colonisation during surgery in our cohort. It has been shown that the cumulative risk of infection increases with every revision 11 . Our data also show a significant correlation between number of shunts and number of infections. However, we found no correlation between the number of revisions and the number of infections. This could be because the definition of ‘revision’ is complex and used for a large range of surgical procedures in our records.

Preventative strategies during surgery may influence the incidence of shunt infections. One of the most important actions shown to reduce shunt infections is perioperative prophylactic antibiotics, with the literature supporting their use in all patients undergoing a shunt insertion 2, 24 . A systematic review and meta-analysis by Ratilal et al. demonstrated that antibiotic prophylaxis can significantly decrease the rate of shunt infection (OR 0.51, 95% CI 0.36-0.73) 25 . Only 65% of the patients in our populations had documented evidence of receiving antibiotics before their first shunt insertion. However, due to incomplete availability of records and a lack of documentation this number is very likely underestimated. Clearer documentation will be necessary in the future to be able to accurately determine this modifiable factor. In the Great North Children’s Hospital it is standard practice to use cefuroxime as prophylaxis before surgery. Cefuroxime covers for infections with S. aureus, but does not cover for infections with CoNS, which was the most frequently found organism causing shunt infection. It may therefore be beneficial to consider using teicoplanin as prophylaxis which is effective against both based on local resistance patterns.

Many different, non-specific symptoms can occur as a consequence of shunt infection 3, 10, 17 . In this study, fever was the most common symptom (67% of the episodes), with cutaneous manifestations more frequent with S. aureus infections and irritability associated with CoNS infections. In children with a shunt who complain of fever, irritability, vomiting, cutaneous manifestations or abdominal pain the suspicion of an infection should be high.

S. epidermidis, S. aureus and other CoNS were the most frequently observed and together accounted for 54% of the organisms found. This correlated with findings from other groups from the United Kingdom, the United States of America, Taiwan, Korea, Spain and Germany 7, 9– 12, 14, 17– 20 . Another relatively frequent organism in the literature was Propionibacterium acnes 19, 26, 27 which was not identified in our cohort possibly due to the fact this organism is mainly found in patients over the age of 14–15 years old, whereas 88% (n=80) of the episodes in this study occurred before 14 years.

In this cohort, 67% underwent shunt removal and 15% underwent shunt externalisation (n=14, of which 9 went on to have shunt removal). In CSF infections, it is best practice to remove the infected device completely and insert an EVD until the CSF is sterilised 18 , 20 . However, in infections very soon after insertion of a shunt, treatment with antibiotic alone could be justified, as the microorganisms have not had the time yet to form a biofilm, but there is a paucity of evidence for this at present and currently the safest option is to remove the infected device completely. There are no specific guidelines, but it is considered safe to insert a new shunt when the CSF has been sterile for 48–72 hours 5 . Since antibiotic treatment should be started as soon as possible, it may be beneficial to develop protocols for the use of empirical antibiotic therapy after CSF sampling at presentation. The agent chosen should cover for at least CoNS and S. aureus, since they were the most common findings. If there is abdominal pain, it may be advisable to choose an agent that also covers for Gram-negative bacteria. This agent should also be able to penetrate the CSF. A combination of linezolid and ceftriaxone would fulfil these requirements, with meropenem as a second line agent. However, specific local resistance patterns should be taken into account. Antibiotics can be rationalised once the CSF culture results are known. The optimal duration of treatment is still unclear ,but should be at least seven to twelve days after the last positive culture, and depending on the microorganisms identified, according to expert opinion. It is best to start treatment IV, as this will allow CSF delivery of antibiotic. Once a patient with confirmed ventriculitis has an EVD, antibiotics should be switched to intrathecal administration when possible, since this seems to be the optimal method of antibiotic delivery to CSF 28, 29 .

Limitations of this study included, the incomplete availability of clinical records and incomplete documentation, resulting in information that was not possible to acquire retrospectively, in particular antibiotic prophylaxis, treatment courses and surgical notes. We were unable to obtain the total number of CSF shunts inserted during this period and were therefore unable to calculate the incidence of shunt infections in our region.

 Data availability

The data referenced by this article are under copyright with the following copyright statement: Copyright: � 2018 Feijen IC et al.

Data associated with the article are available under the terms of the Creative Commons Zero "No rights reserved" data waiver (CC0 1.0 Public domain dedication).

Dataset 1: Data outlining the demographics and treatment course for each anonymised patient. 10.5256/f1000research.15514.d211612 30

The results presented here have previously been presented as a part of an abstract for the 2016 34 th Annual European Society for Paediatric Infectious Diseases meeting and can be found here.

 Acknowledgments

Special thanks to the clinical records department of the Royal Victoria Infirmary for their help in obtaining clinical records.

 Supplementary material

Supplementary File 1: Proforma

Click here to access the data.

 Scadding JW Losseff N : Clinical neurology.4th ed. London: Hodder Arnold,2012. Reference Source Kaye AH : Essential neurosurgery.3rd ed. Malden, Mass.: Blackwell,2005. Reference Source Pople IK : Hydrocephalus and shunts: what the neurologist should know. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2002;73 Suppl 1:i17–22. 12185257 1765598 Forsyth R Newton RW : Paediatric neurology.Second edition. ed. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press,2012. Reference Source Ellenbogen RG Abdulrauf SI Sekhar LG : Principles of neurological surgery.Philadelphia, PA: Saunders/Elsevier,2012. Reference Source Wong JM Ziewacz JE Ho AL : Patterns in neurosurgical adverse events: cerebrospinal fluid shunt surgery. Neurosurg Focus. 2012;33(5):E13. 23116093 10.3171/2012.7.FOCUS12179 Richards HK Seeley HM Pickard JD : Efficacy of antibiotic-impregnated shunt catheters in reducing shunt infection: data from the United Kingdom Shunt Registry. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2009;4(4):389–93. 19795972 10.3171/2009.4.PEDS09210 Simon TD Hall M Riva-Cambrin J : Infection rates following initial cerebrospinal fluid shunt placement across pediatric hospitals in the United States. Clinical article. J Neurosurg Pediat. 2009;4(2):156–65. 19645551 10.3171/2009.3.PEDS08215 2896258 Wang KW Chang WN Shih TY : Infection of cerebrospinal fluid shunts: causative pathogens, clinical features, and outcomes. Jpn J Infect Dis. 2004;57(2):44–8. 15118207 Lee JK Seok JY Lee JH : Incidence and risk factors of ventriculoperitoneal shunt infections in children: a study of 333 consecutive shunts in 6 years. J Korean Med Sci. 2012;27(12):1563–8. 23255859 10.3346/jkms.2012.27.12.1563 3524439 McGirt MJ Zaas A Fuchs HE : Risk factors for pediatric ventriculoperitoneal shunt infection and predictors of infectious pathogens. Clin Infect Dis. 2003;36(7):858–62. 12652386 10.1086/368191 Samandouras G : Shunts and endoscopic third ventriculostomy.The Neurosurgeon's Handbook: Oxford University Press (OUP),2010;696–702. Vinchon M Dhellemmes P : Cerebrospinal fluid shunt infection: risk factors and long-term follow-up. Childs Nerv Syst. 2006;22(7):692–7. 16534646 10.1007/s00381-005-0037-8 Gutiérrez-González R Boto GR Pérez-Zamarrón Á : Cerebrospinal fluid diversion devices and infection. A comprehensive review. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2012;31(6):889–97. 21960033 10.1007/s10096-011-1420-x Pople IK Bayston R Hayward RD : Infection of cerebrospinal fluid shunts in infants: a study of etiological factors. J Neurosurg. 1992;77(1):29–36. 1607969 10.3171/jns.1992.77.1.0029 Kulkarni AV Drake JM Lamberti-Pasculli M : Cerebrospinal fluid shunt infection: a prospective study of risk factors. J Neurosurg. 2001;94(2):195–201. 11213954 10.3171/jns.2001.94.2.0195 von der Brelie C Simon A Gröner A : Evaluation of an institutional guideline for the treatment of cerebrospinal fluid shunt-associated infections. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2012;154(9):1691–7. 22454037 10.1007/s00701-012-1329-x Adams DJ Rajnik M : Microbiology and Treatment of Cerebrospinal Fluid Shunt Infections in Children. Curr Infect Dis Rep. 2014;16(10):427. 25129115 10.1007/s11908-014-0427-8 Fulkerson DH Sivaganesan A Hill JD : Progression of cerebrospinal fluid cell count and differential over a treatment course of shunt infection. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2011;8(6):613–9. 22132920 10.3171/2011.8.PEDS11236 Drew RJ Cole TS Lee MK : Antimicrobial treatment options for neurosurgical ventricular shunt infections in children from 1993 to 2012: a systematic review. Childs Nerv Syst. 2014;30(5):841–50. 24322604 10.1007/s00381-013-2333-z Fey PD : Modality of bacterial growth presents unique targets: how do we treat biofilm-mediated infections? Curr Opin Microbiol. 2010;13(5):610–5. 20884280 10.1016/j.mib.2010.09.007 2966470 Kestle JR Garton HJ Whitehead WE : Management of shunt infections: a multicenter pilot study. J Neurosurg. 2006;105(3 Suppl):177–81. 16970229 10.3171/ped.2006.105.3.177 Yılmaz A Dalgic N Müslüman M : Linezolid treatment of shunt-related cerebrospinal fluid infections in children. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2010;5(5):443–8. 20433254 10.3171/2009.12.PEDS09421 Klimo P Jr Van Poppel M Thompson CJ : Pediatric hydrocephalus: systematic literature review and evidence-based guidelines. Part 6: Preoperative antibiotics for shunt surgery in children with hydrocephalus: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2014;14 Suppl 1:44–52. 25988782 10.3171/2014.7.PEDS14326 Ratilal B Costa J Sampaio C : Antibiotic prophylaxis for surgical introduction of intracranial ventricular shunts: a systematic review. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2008;1(1):48–56. 18352803 10.3171/PED-08/01/048 Arnell K Cesarini K Lagerqvist-Widh A : Cerebrospinal fluid shunt infections in children over a 13-year period: anaerobic cultures and comparison of clinical signs of infection with Propionibacterium acnes and with other bacteria. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2008;1(5):366–72. 18447670 10.3171/PED/2008/1/5/366 Conen A Walti Laura N Merlo A : Characteristics and treatment outcome of cerebrospinal fluid shunt-associated infections in adults: a retrospective analysis over an 11-year period. Clin Infect Dis. 2008;47(1):73–82. 18484878 10.1086/588298 Ragel B Browd S Schmidt R : Surgical shunt infection: significant reduction when using intraventricular and systemic antibiotic agents. J Neurosurg. 2006;105(2):242–7. 17219829 10.3171/jns.2006.105.2.242 Moussa WM Mohamed MA : Efficacy of postoperative antibiotic injection in and around ventriculoperitoneal shunt in reduction of shunt infection: A randomized controlled trial. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2016;143:144–9. 26945767 10.1016/j.clineuro.2016.02.034 Feijen IC Rodrigues CMC Cowie CJA : Dataset 1 in: Characteristics and management of ventricular shunt infections in children, 2000–2015: a single centre retrospective chart review. F1000Research. 2018. http://www.doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.15514.d211612 10.5256/f1000research.16916.r39134 Reviewer response for version 1 Trampuz Andrej 1 Referee https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5219-2521 Berlin Institute of Health, Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery (CMSC), Charité –Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany

Competing interests: No competing interests were disclosed.

 15 10 2018 Copyright: © 2018 Trampuz A 2018 This is an open access peer review report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. recommendation reject

The authors analyzed 92 episodes of ventriculoperitoneal shunts in patients aged under 18 years at the time of infection. The article is well written, however, I have some concerns regarding the content and conclusions.

Patient data were collected with the use of a standardised proforma, however, no definition criteria were presented. Simply citing that “A shunt infection was defined as any patient coded as ‘shunt infection’ at discharge or any patient who received treatment for suspected shunt infection, with or without microbiological confirmation” is not sufficient. There are different established definition criteria and at least one of them should be used and the frequency of each defining criteria should be presented.

The second main concern is that conclusions do not follow the results. As this was a retrospective observational study, no recommendations can be given regarding the antibiotic or surgical treatment. It is just a description of the treatment children received in this institution. In particular, I strongly disagree with recommending a combination of linezolid and ceftriaxone as first-line treatment. For the evaluation of the outcome, only one sentence was provided, which insufficient – how was the outcome evaluation performed, what was the definition of failure, what was the follow-up time etc.

Another point is that the author recommend complete removal of the shunt and placement of an EVD seems the safest surgical treatment. The question is, however, when the shunt can be retained an eradication of biofilm-associated infection with biofilm-active antibiotics can be achieved. Rifampin was used in about half of patients, but detailed data are lacking.

That it would be beneficial to develop a guideline for recognition and treatment of shunt infections and that empirical antibiotic treatment should be started as soon as possible is not a conclusion of this study and was already known from previous studies, so it should be deleted from the conclusion section.

Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?

Partly

If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?

Partly

Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?

Yes

Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?

Partly

Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?

No

Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?

No

Reviewer Expertise:

Biofilm infections associated with implants and devices

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to state that I do not consider it to be of an acceptable scientific standard, for reasons outlined above.