F1000ResearchF1000Research2046-1402F1000 Research LimitedLondon, UK10.12688/f1000research.19699.1Research ArticleArticlesThe effect of triple antibiotic paste as an intracanal medication with an anti-inflammatory drug on post-operative pain of asymptomatic uniradicular necrotic teeth: a double blind randomized clinical trial
[version 1; peer review: 1 approved, 1 approved with reservations, 1 not approved]
OmaiaMohamedConceptualizationData CurationFormal AnalysisFunding AcquisitionInvestigationMethodologyProject AdministrationResourcesSoftwareValidationWriting – Original Draft PreparationWriting – Review & Editinghttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-1200-2065a1NegmMagedSupervision1NashaatYousraSupervisionhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-2907-39892NabilNehalSupervision1OthmanAmalSupervision3
Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo university, Cairo, 11553, Egypt
Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, October 6 university, Giza, Egypt
Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, October 6 University, Giza, Egyptmohamed.omaia@dentistry.cu.edu.eg
Background: Flare-ups may occur after root canal treatment which consist of acute exacerbation of asymptomatic pulpal and/or periradicular pathologic condition. The causative factors of interappointment pain include mechanical, chemical or microbial irritation to the pulp or periradicular tissues. The potential role of microorganisms in interappointment pain is why the success of endodontic treatment depends on complete eradication of microorganisms capable of causing an intraradicular or extraradicular infection. This can be achieved by mechanical cleaning and shaping, in conjunction with irrigation and antibacterial agents. The aim of this study was to assess the ability of triple antibiotic paste with the anti-inflammatory drug diclofenac potassium versus calcium hydroxide used as an intra-canal medication in reducing post-operative pain.
Methods: 84 patients with asymptomatic uniradicular necrotic teeth were randomly assigned into two groups according to the intra-canal medication used: calcium hydroxide group (CH) and triple antibiotic paste with diclofenac potassium group (TAPC). In the first treatment session, intracoronal cavity preparation was performed after rubber dam isolation followed by chemo-mechanical preparation using rotary Protaper Universal files with saline irrigation followed by intra-canal medication placement then postoperative pain was assessed at 24, 48 and 72 hours postoperatively using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). In the second treatment session, intracanal medications were removed by irrigation using saline followed by obturation.
Results:Both intracanal medicaments resulted in a statistically significant decrease in mean pain value from 24 to 48 and 72 hours postoperatively. While when comparing both groups, TAPC intracanal medication showed less post-operative pain compared to that of the CH group at 24, 48 and 72 hours with a statistically significant difference at 48 hours only.
Conclusion: Both intracanal medicaments were efficient in reducing post-operative pain in asymptomatic uniradicular necrotic teeth.
TAPdiclofenac potassiumanti-inflammatorycalcium hydroxideintracanal medicationnecroticpost-operative pain.The author(s) declared that no grants were involved in supporting this work.Introduction
The severity and incidence of post-operative pain are usually associated with specific dental treatments; the highest of which is root canal therapy
1.
Post-operative pain is a common finding after endodontic treatment, its incidence ranges from 3% to 58%. It may be due to microbial, mechanical or chemical injury to the periapical tissues
2,
3. It is the main reason why patients seek endodontic treatment, therefore it must be accompanied by efficient relief of pain to be considered successful by both patients and clinicians
4.
Indeed, acute periradicular inflammation such as acute periodontitis or acute periradicular abscess secondary to intracanal procedure is one of the causes of postoperative pain
5,
6. Infected debris from the root canal system may induce an acute inflammatory response of the tissues in response to the applied irritants
7.
Microorganisms are the primary cause for pulp and periapical diseases. The failure to eliminate them and their by-products may result in persistent irritation and impaired healing
8.
Pain is a subjective experience and difficult to quantify and standardize. Pain is influenced by many factors e.g. personality, behavior, physical and psychological factors; making it a challenge to measure. Several scales and methods have been used for the assessment of pain after endodontic therapy. Among them, numerical, verbal and visual analogue scales are used in most clinical studies
9.
A visual analogue scale was used to assess postoperative pain. This is a valid and reliable method which has been widely used in endodontic literature
10,
11.
Post-endodontic pain, particularly after initial root canal treatment, should ideally be eliminated by the therapy; however, analgesics and/or anti-inflammatory drugs are frequently required to reduce post-operative pain
9.
Endodontic therapy is directed toward one specific aim: to cure or prevent periradicular periodontitis. Our challenge as endodontists is to implement methods to eliminate these microorganisms during and after root canal treatment.
It has been suggested that calcium hydroxide has pain preventive properties because of its antimicrobial and tissue altering effects
12. Furtheremore studies have shown that calcium hydroxide has the ability to dissolve necrotic tissues alone or may increase the effect of other solvents. This suggests that calcium hydroxide would be an effective agent in cleaning and disinfecting infected root canals
13.
Systemic antibiotics appear to be clinically effective as an adjunct in certain surgical and nonsurgical endodontic procedures. Their administration is not without potential risk of adverse systemic effects, such as toxicity, allergic reactions and the development of resistant strains of microbes
14. Furthermore, the systemic administration of antibiotics depends on patient’s compliance with the dosing regimens followed by absorption through the gastro-intestinal tract and distribution via the circulatory system to bring the drug to the infected site. Hence, the infected area requires a normal blood supply which is no longer the case for teeth with necrotic pulps and for teeth without pulp tissue. Therefore, local application of antibiotics within the root canal system may be a more effective mode for delivering the drug
15.
A successful endodontic treatment is therefore dependent on the initial eradication of all the bacteria, i.e. those present in the root canal as well as those already penetrated in depth
16. The achievement of microbicidal doses becomes critical in the endodontic environment, because in such harsh conditions bacteria may aggregate to form a biofilm or enter a stationary phase, thus acquiring a resistant phenotype. Accordingly, in endodontic therapy the local use of antibiotics allows the use of the necessary very high concentrations
17.
Because root canal infections are polymicrobial, consisting of both aerobic and anaerobic bacterial species, a single antibiotic may not be effective in root canal disinfection. Therefore, a combination of antibiotics, mainly consisting of ciprofloxacin, metronidazole and minocycline, referred to as triple antibiotic paste (TAP) has been suggested for root canal disinfection
18,
19.
MethodsStudy setting
The study design is a parallel double blind randomized controlled clinical trial with a 1:1 allocation ratio and a Superiority Framework. The study was conducted between March 2017 and July 2018 in the Endodontic clinic of the Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University. The protocol of this study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine, Cairo University, Egypt (approval number 16/10/28). The nature of this study, and potential risks were explained to the patients and informed consent forms were signed before treatment sessions. This trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov on 20
th September 2016 (
NCT02907489).
This article was written in concordance with the CONSORT checklist 2010 (see reporting guidelines).
Sample size
To assess TAPC versus CH regarding the postoperative pain, an independent t test was done. It was estimated that a total of 75 patients would be required for the detection of a difference between groups using a two-tailed α of 0.05 and a power of 0.80 if the absolute difference in post-operative pain is 0.35 with SD 0.65 as reported in Johns
et al., 2014
20. To compensate losses during the follow-up this number should be increased to 84 patients (10% more than the calculated). Sample size was calculated using
G* power program (3.1.9.2/ 2014) (University of Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany).
Participants
The subjects were selected from the regular attendees of endodontic clinic, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University. A written announcement was published in the endodontic clinic to inform the attendees regarding the trial, the patients who indicated their interest to participate in the study were checked for eligibility and signed an informed consent.
Patients were carefully diagnosed and checked for the eligibility criteria through careful clinical examination using a diagnostic mirror and probe, percussion with the back of a diagnostic mirror and palpation with the index finger to indicate the presence of any swelling or tenderness were done. An electric pulp tester (Denjoy DY310, Henan) that was positioned at the middle third of the labial/buccal surface of the tooth was used to check pulp vitality of the affected tooth, with the adjacent and contra-lateral teeth used as a control. All data was recorded in medical history charts, dental history charts and pain scale charts (Extended data
21).
Preoperative pain was recorded, with each patient given pain scale chart (visual analogue scale (VAS)) in order to record his/her pain level before any intervention. The pain scale (0–10 scale) consisted of a 100 mm horizontal ruler with no numbers except a 0 at the first part of the scale and a 10 in the last part of the scale. The patients were asked to mark the point that was equivalent to their pain perception. The pain levels were classified as no pain (0), mild pain (1-3), moderate pain (4-7) or severe pain (8-10) and postoperative pain was assessed at 24, 48 and 72 hours after intracanal medication placement.
The VAS is considered to be a valid and reliable scale for the measurement of pain. This method may have some limitations in terms of objectivity considering the heterogeneity of personal character
22. However, previous studies argued that this method can be considered adequately reliable
23. Therefore, VAS was used in this study to evaluate post-operative pain.
In total, 84 participants were included in the study with maxillary or mandibular asymptomatic necrotic single rooted teeth as studies have suggested that postoperative pain is more likely to occur in multirooted teeth because in multirooted tooth other variable exist which may affect our treatment outcome
24. Non-vital teeth were selected because research has found that post-operative pain in teeth with non-vital pulp are more common than teeth with vital pulp due to the presence of high level of irritants and infectious agents in pulpal and periapical region
25–
27. Asymptomatic teeth were chosen because studies have shown that the presence of preoperative pain can significantly increase the possibility of postoperative pain
27,
28.
Inclusion criteria: Subjects aged between 18–50 years. Both male and female medically free (without any systemic diseases) and healthy subjects. Mandibular and maxillary single rooted asymptomatic non vital teeth were chosen.
Exclusion criteria: Teeth with acute dentoalveolar abscess, subjects having more than one tooth that require root canal treatment. Subjects that have taken analgesic, anti-inflammatory or antibiotic drugs during the 10 days prior to the start of treatment. Pregnant females. Subjects with systemic diseases such as endocrine diseases, infectious diseases or psychological disturbance. Subjects taking chronic pain medications. Teeth with periodontal disease or pulp calcification.
Patients were randomly assigned into two groups (n=42/group) according to the intra-canal medication used, using computer generated randomization (
www.random.org). The assistant supervisor (A.O.) generated the random sequence and assigned the participants to the intervention or control groups.
Secondary outcome: Intracanal bacterial reduction of each strain of bacteria obtained from the root canals before (S1) and after instrumentation (S2) in the first treatment session. Subsequently, intra-canal medication was placed and bacterial reduction was assessed in the second session after 3 days (S3) using colony forming unit test.
Measuring device: Bacterial culture.
Measuring unit: Colony forming units per milliliter of blood agar medium.
*Secondary outcome will be published in a separate manuscript.
Intervention
First visit: Preoperative intraoral periapical radiograph was taken
(Kodak intraoral periapical films speed D, Size 2, KODAK). Teeth were anaesthetized by local anesthesia with a non-disposable metallic aspirating syringe using 1.8 ml Mepivacaine HCl 2% - Levonordefrin 1:20000
(Carpule Mepecaine-L, Alexandria Company for Pharmaceuticals and Chemical Industries, Egypt, #1423). An access cavity preparation was performed using round bur size 3 and endo-Z bur for deroofing under a continuous irrigation with sterile physiologic saline
(El Nasr Pharmaceutical Chemicals CO., Abu Zaabal, Egypt). A rubber dam was placed. The patency of the canals was checked using size 15 K-files
(MANI, INC., Tochigi, Japan). Working length was determined using an electronic apex locator
(Root ZX, J.Morita USA, Irvine, CA) at the “0.5” mark then was confirmed with intraoral periapical radiograph, to be 0.5–1 mm, shorter than radiographic apex. The canals were instrumented to a size 25 K-type file
(MANI, INC., Tochigi, Japan). Preparation of teeth was performed with rotary ProTaper Universal instruments
(Dentsply Maillefer, TN, USA) in an endodontic motor and reducing hand piece
(X-Smart, Dentsply Maillefer, USA), according to the manufacturer instructions. The canals were thoroughly irrigated using 2ml of sterile physiologic saline as an irrigant between each instrument and the next. At this stage the canals were dried and filled with intra-canal medication according to the randomly selected group (TAPC group- combination of 500 mg ciprofloxacin, 500 mg metronidazole, 55 mg minocycline and 50 mg diclofenac potassium ground and then mixed with saline to obtain creamy consistency and CH group #MB-302001) (
Table 1). A cotton pellet was placed in the pulp chamber and the access cavity was sealed with a temporary filling Orafil-G
(Prevest Denpro, Digiana, India #11002). Postoperative pain was assessed with a visual analog scale at 24, 48 and 72 hours after the procedures.
Material specification, composition and manufacturer.
Material
Specification
Composition
Manufacturer
Metapex
Non setting Calcium
Hydroxide with
Iodoform
Calcium Hydroxide, Iodoform and Silicon oil.
META BIOMED Co, Chungbuk, Korea.
[270 Osongsaengmyeong1-ro, Osong-eup,
Heungdeok-gu, Cheongju-si, Chungbuk, Korea /
Tel :043-218-1981]
http://www.meta-biomed.com
Tripleantibioticpaste (TAP)
Mixture of
ciprofloxacin,
metronidazole and
minocycline.
Using commercially available tablets of
Ciprofloxacin (Ciprofloxacin 500 mg),
Metronidazole (Flagyl 500 mg) and
Minocycline (Minocin 50 mg). Following the
removal of the enteric coating of the tablets,
the contents were ground using a mortar
and pestle and mixed in an equal amounts
by weight (1:1:1) in a mixing pad (100 mg of
each) and then will be dissolved in 100 mL of
sterile water to prepare 1 mg/mL solution of
TAP
31
Flagyl 500 mg: (Sanofi Aventis, Cairo, Egypt)
3, El Massaneh St. Zietoun, Cairo, Egypt
Tel.: +202 22860000 22860060/1/2
www.sanofi.comCiprofloxacin 500 mg: (Amriya pharm, Alexandria,
Egypt) Alexandria-Cairo Desert Rd. Km 25,
Amriya, Alexandria, Egypt.
Tel.: +20 (3) 470-1001 / 470-1151 / 470-1146
http://amriyapharm.com/Minocin 50 mg: (Sedico, Giza, Egypt)
1st. industrial zone, 6th of October City, Giza, Egypt
Tel: +202-38200575/78/90
http://www.sedico.net
Catafast
50 mg NSAIDs
granules for oral
solution (Diclofenac
potassium)
Every sachet contains 50 mg diclofenac
potassium, Potassium hydrogen carbonate,
mannitol; aspartame, saccharin sodium,
glyceryl dibehenate, mint flavor, anise flavor.
NOVARTIS PHARMA S.A.E., Cairo, Egypt[El Sawah St. – EL Amiria, Cairo, Egypt]Tel: +20 2 24567200https://www.novartis.com.eg/
The recommended retention period for intracanal medication is no less than 14 days. However, recontamination of the canal may take place if the medicament is retained for 2 weeks
29,
30. That is why intracanal medicaments was placed for 72 hours in the present study.
Second visit: After 72 hours the patients returned and the intracanal medication was removed by irrigation with a sterile physiologic saline. Periapical radiograph was taken with the master gutta percha ProTaper cone
(Dentsply Maillefer, TN, USA) for master cone verification. Obturation was done by modified single cone technique using ProTaper gutta percha points, ADseal resin sealer
(META BIOMED Co, Chungbuk, Korea #DM-15-4) and auxiliaries gutta percha cones size 25
(META BIOMED Co, Chungbuk, Korea). A cotton pellet was placed in the pulp chamber and the access cavity was sealed with a temporary filling
. Postoperative intraoral periapical radiograph was taken.
Blinding
The study was double-blinded in which participants, the outcome assessor and data analyst were blinded in this trial. The operator couldn’t be blinded due to the nature of the study as the intracanal medicament must be exposed and can’t be masked.
Participants: Participants did not know which group they were treated with; Numbered papers indicating the intra-canal medicament to be used were packed in opaque closed envelopes by M.N., where the patient picked up an envelope. After mechanical preparation, operator M.O. opened the envelope and used the intra-canal medicament assigned to that patient according to the number present inside the envelope.
Outcome Assessor: The assistant supervisor (Y.N.) who collected the VAS, did not know which group the participants were assigned to.
Data Analyst: The assistant supervisor (N.N.) performed the statistical analysis.
Harms
If any harm was seen in the participants either in intervention or control groups they were recorded and reported at the end of the trial. The treatment according to the harm:
- Pain: administration of Anti-inflammatory analgesics. (Brufen 600 mg, 1 tablet when needed).
- Swelling: hot fomentation, mouth rinse with salty warm water, antibiotic administration in-case of presence of fever or lymphadenopathy (Augmentin 1 gm, capsule every 12 hour for 5 days).
Statistical analysis
Data were presented as means and standard deviations (SD) when appropriate. Data explored for normality was performed using D’Agostino-Pearson test. Independent t-test was used to compare between tested groups in age and mean pain (VAS). Chi square test was used to compare between tested groups for gender, teeth position and distribution and VAS scores. The significance level was set at P ≤ 0.05 (α=0.05). Intention to treat was used to adjust analysis for loss of patients during follow up period.
Statistical analysis was performed with IBM®
SPSS® (IBM Corp. Released 2015. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 23.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.)
ResultsI-Demographic data
93 patients were assessed for eligibility, 9 patients were excluded (5 were not meeting inclusion criteria while 4 declined to participate); in total 84 patients were randomly assigned, received intended treatment, and were analysed for the primary outcome (see underlying data
21). 3 participants were lost during follow up period after the first treatment session (2 from CH group and 1 from TAPC group) as they refused to continue and their treated tooth was extracted, implants to replace the extracted tooth were offered but none of the participants elected to have one. A CONSORT flow diagram is available as part of the reporting guidelines. Demographic data; age and gender had no significant difference between the two groups (P=0.966 and 0.141 respectively;
Table 2 and
Table 3).
Means and standard deviations (SD) of age for different tested groups.
Groups
p-value
Group 1
(CH)
1
Group 2
(TAPC)
2
Mean
SD
Mean
SD
Age
32.23
9.75
32.32
9.65
0.966 NS
NS=non-significant, *= Significant
*: Significant at P ≤ 0.05
1. CH: Calcium hydroxide group.
2. TAPC: Triple antibiotic paste+catafast group
Frequency (N) and percentage (%) of gender for different tested groups.
Groups
p-value
Group 1
(CH)
1
Group 2
(TAPC)
2
N
%
N
%
Gender
Female
14
35.0%
21
51.2%
0.141 NS
Male
26
65.0%
20
48.8%
NS=non-significant, *= Significant
*: Significant at P ≤ 0.05
1. CH: Calcium hydroxide group.
2. TAPC: Triple antibiotic paste+catafast group.
II-Postoperative pain
The overall highest incidence of pain values in both groups was at 24 hours postoperatively. Whereas the lowest incidence of pain values was at 72 hours postoperatively with a statistically significant difference between them (P≤0.001). The TAPC group showed statistically significant lower postoperative pain values at 48 hours only compared with the CH group (P=0.041), while at 24 and 72 hours there was no statistical significance (P=0.083 and 0.063, respectively) (
Figure 1 and
Table 4).
Bar chart showing mean visual analogue scale (VAS) for tested groups.
Means and standard deviations (SD) of visual analogue scale (VAS) for different tested groups.
Groups
p-value
Group 1
(CH)
1
Group 2
(TAPC)
2
Mean
SD
Mean
SD
VAS
24 hrs
3.18
a
2.37
2.27
a
2.28
0.083 NS
48 hrs
2.20
b
2.00
1.39
b
1.46
0.041
*
72 hrs
1.30
c
1.36
0.78
c
1.11
0.063 NS
p-value
≤0.001
*
≤0.001
*
Different letters within each column indicates significant difference.
NS=non-significant, *= Significant,
*: Significant at P ≤ 0.05.
1. CH: Calcium hydroxide group.
2. TAPC: Triple antibiotic paste+catafast group.
Discussion
Post-endodontic pain is one of the major problems for both patients and dentists
32. Development of post-operative pain after root canal treatment frequently occurs. Several risk factors such as gender, age, type of intracanal medication used, presence of pre-operative pain, pulpal and periradicular diagnosis and apical extrusion of debris have been correlated with the occurrence of flare-ups
33,
34. Preoperative pain was recorded for each patient before starting treatment as it was considered a risk factor that can affect the postoperative pain
35,
36.
In this study, both groups were substantially homogeneous at diagnosis and had similar preoperative clinical conditions. Onay
et al. (2015)34 found that age, gender and tooth type did not influence the incidence of flare-ups. However, Arias
et al. (2013)37 and Sadaf
et al. (2014)35 reported that age, gender, tooth type and pre-operative pain are factors that influence post-operative pain. In the present study, the results showed a non-significant correlation between mean post-operative pain with gender and age of the patients in both groups except for CH group (after 24 and 48 hours).
In this study, factors affecting post-operative pain were excluded such as patients taking drugs that alter pain perception’ such as analgesics and antibiotics; patients with systemic diseases that could affect treatment; or patients suffering from psychological disturbances.
The purpose of this randomized clinical trial was to compare post-operative pain intensity after local medication with triple antibiotic paste together with an anti-inflammatory drug with that of calcium hydroxide. The incidence and intensity of postoperative pain was recorded at 24, 48 and 72 hours after placement of intra-canal medication.
An observable drop in pain levels in different follow up periods of both groups were recorded. This was in accordance to Pak
et al. (2011)38 who reported that post-treatment pain decreased substantially after 1–2 days of treatment and continued to drop to minimal levels after 7 days.
Although the TAPC group showed lower mean pain score levels at 24 and 72 hours than CH group, there was no statistically significant difference in the pain levels between both groups. While after 48 hours the mean pain score was significantly lower in TAPC group than CH with a statistically significant difference. Diclofenac has shown a substantial reduction of postendodontic pain when administered preoperatively in a single oral dose
39. Sharma
et al. (1994) evaluated pain-relief post extraction in patients receiving oral ibuprofen. Pain-relief was attributed to the rapid absorption of granule formulation and/or a local action of ibuprofen in solution in the mouth
40. Therefore, potential advantages that may be acquired by the use of NSAIDs as intracanal medicament are: anti-inflammatory action and local analgesia.
Although calcium hydroxide is considered the gold standard for disinfecting root canals and has been widely used as an intra-canal medicament since 1920’s
41, its role in eliminating bacteria associated with apical infections is controversial. Microorganism have the ability to invade the dentinal tubules and buffer the high pH produced by calcium hydroxide compromising its antimicrobial activity
42. Calcium hydroxide release hydroxyl ions which increase alkalinity leading to death of bacteria and microorganisms inside the root canal
42.
Additionally, some studies showed that calcium hydroxide is insufficient for the elimination of some symptoms, and thus, antibiotic pastes are used as an alternative
43,
44 due to their good antimicrobial and biocompatible properties
45,
46. This could be attributed to the combined spectrum of antimicrobial activity and synergetic or additive actions of antibiotics “ciprofloxacin, metronidazole, and minocycline” found in TAP. Individually, ciprofloxacin has a broad spectrum activity and acts against both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria by inactivating enzymes and inhibiting cell division
47. Metronidazole is effective against obligate anaerobes, which are common in the deep dentin of infected root canals and acts by disrupting bacterial DNA
47. Minocycline is a broad-spectrum tetracycline antibiotic and acts by inhibiting protein synthesis and inhibiting matrix metalloproteinase enzyme
47. Combination of these three antibiotics overcomes bacterial resistance and achieves higher antimicrobial action
18. Previous studies have shown favorable results when antibiotic mixture of ciprofloxacin, metronidazole, and minocycline has been used as topical root canal agents
18,
19,
48. The absence of inter-appointment flare-up with TAP can also be attributed to the anti-inflammatory property of minocycline
49. Although antibiotic pastes have been successfully used in endodontic procedures, they should be completely removed before final root canal obturation to avoid their negative effects, such as tooth discoloration, cytotoxicity, and prevention of sealer or cement penetration into root dentin
50,
51. However, it is impossible to completely remove antibiotic pastes from the root canal using conventional irrigation protocol
51–
53.
This study is a randomized clinical trial conducted on a relatively large sample size male and female patients with age ranging between 18-50, in real clinical settings and was conducted efficiently so it may be reasonable to generalize the results. It proposes an alternative way for decreasing post-operative pain of asymptomatic uniradicular necrotic teeth.
Within the limitations of this study, it is recommended to use the TAPC intracanal medicaments in necrotic cases, which could lead to efficient pain relief post-operatively. It could also be recommended to modify the eligibility criteria to include teeth with irreversible pulpitis to evaluate the effect of the presence of inflamed vital pulpal tissues on the post-operative pain.
Further
in vivo and immunological studies are needed to identify the exact mechanism by which the TAPC resulted in decreasing postoperative pain and to determine the cytotoxic effect of TAPC.
Conclusion
The use of triple antibiotic paste with diclofenac potassium anti-inflammatory drug as well as calcium hydroxide as intracanal medications proved to be efficient in reducing post-operative pain in asymptomatic uniradicular necrotic teeth.
Data availabilityUnderlying data
Figshare: The effect of triple antibiotic paste as an intracanal medication with an anti-inflammatory drug on post-operative pain of asymptomatic uniradicular necrotic teeth: a double blind randomized clinical trial.
https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.827698121
This project contains the following underlying data:
Results.xlsx (Demographic and pain data for participants)
Extended data
Figshare: The effect of triple antibiotic paste as an intracanal medication with an anti-inflammatory drug on post-operative pain of asymptomatic uniradicular necrotic teeth: a double blind randomized clinical trial.
https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.827698121
This project contains the following extended data:
DIAGNOSTIC CHART.docx (Form used to collect patient data)
Pain scale chart english version.docx (Visual analogue pain scale, English)
Figshare: CONSORT checklist and flowchart for article ‘The effect of triple antibiotic paste as an intracanal medication with an anti-inflammatory drug on post-operative pain of asymptomatic uniradicular necrotic teeth: a double blind randomized clinical trial.’
https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.827698121
KayaogluGGurelMSaricamE:
Predictive Model of Intraoperative Pain during Endodontic Treatment: Prospective Observational Clinical Study.J Endod.2016;42(1):36–41.
2657787210.1016/j.joen.2015.09.021SathornCParashosPMesserH:
The prevalence of postoperative pain and flare-up in single- and multiple-visit endodontic treatment: a systematic review.Int Endod J.2008;41(2):91–9.
1795656110.1111/j.1365-2591.2007.01316.xSiqueiraJFBarnettF:
Interappointment pain: mechanisms, diagnosis and treatment.Endod Top.2004;7(1):93–109.
10.1111/j.1601-1546.2004.00062.xO’KeefeEM:
Pain in endodontic therapy: preliminary study.J Endod.1976;2(10):315–319.
106820810.1016/S0099-2399(76)80047-7NgYLGlennonJPSetchellDJ:
Prevalence of and factors affecting post-obturation pain in patients undergoing root canal treatment.Int Endod J.2004;37(6):381–91.
1518624510.1111/j.1365-2591.2004.00820.xWaltonRFouadA:
Endodontic interappointment flare-ups: a prospective study of incidence and related factors.J Endod.1992;18(4):172–7.
140257110.1016/S0099-2399(06)81413-5Chávez de Paz VillanuevaLE:
Fusobacterium nucleatum in endodontic flare-ups.Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod.2002;93(2):179–83.
1186220810.1067/moe.2002.120803GoldmanMRankinCMehlmanR:
The immunologic implications and clinical management of the endodontic flare-up.Compendium.1988;9(2):126–30.
3278807ElzakiWMAbubakrNHZiadaHM:
Double-blind Randomized Placebo-controlled Clinical Trial of Efficiency of Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs in the Control of Post-endodontic Pain.J Endod.2016;42(6):835–42.
2708011510.1016/j.joen.2016.02.014HargreavesKMKeiserK:
Local anesthetic failure in endodontics: mechanisms and management.Endod Topics.2002;1(1):26–39.
10.1034/j.1601-1546.2002.10103.xPolycarpouNNgYLCanavanD:
Prevalence of persistent pain after endodontic treatment and factors affecting its occurrence in cases with complete radiographic healing.Int Endod J.2005;38(3):169–78.
1574342010.1111/j.1365-2591.2004.00923.xWaltonREHoltonIFJrMichelichR:
Calcium hydroxide as an intracanal medication: effect on posttreatment pain.J Endod.2003;29(10):627–9.
1460678210.1097/00004770-200310000-00003SafaviKEDowdenWEIntrocasoJH:
A comparison of antimicrobial effects of calcium hydroxide and iodine-potassium iodide.J Endod.1985;11(10):454–6.
386599210.1016/S0099-2399(85)80086-8JagdaleSBhargavaKBhosaleS:
Comparative evaluation of coronal discoloration induced by two triple antibiotic revascularization protocols when used at varying depths of temporary sealing material at the end of varying time periods.J Conserv Dent.2018;21(4):388–93.
301228196080185GiladJZTelesRGoodsonM:
Development of a clindamycin-impregnated fiber as an intracanal medication in endodontic therapy.J Endod.1999;25(11):722–7.
1072653710.1016/S0099-2399(99)80117-4RahimiSJananiMLotfiM:
A review of antibacterial agents in endodontic treatment.Iran Endod J.2014;9(3):161–8.
250315874099945KhademiAAMohammadiZHavaeeA:
Evaluation of the antibacterial substantivity of several intra-canal agents.Aust Endod J.2006;32(3):112–5.
1720175210.1111/j.1747-4477.2006.00033.xHoshinoEKurihara-AndoNSatoI:
In-vitro antibacterial susceptibility of bacteria taken from infected root dentine to a mixture of ciprofloxacin, metronidazole and minocycline.Int Endod J.1996;29(2):125–30.
920643610.1111/j.1365-2591.1996.tb01173.xWindleyW3rdTeixeiraFLevinL:
Disinfection of immature teeth with a triple antibiotic paste.J Endod.2005;31(6):439–43.
1591768310.1097/01.don.0000148143.80283.eaJohnsDAVarugheseJMThomasK:
Clinical and radiographical evaluation of the healing of large periapical lesions using triple antibiotic paste, photo activated disinfection and calcium hydroxide when used as root canal disinfectant.J Clin Exp Dent.2014;6(3):230–6.
2513642210.4317/jced.513244134850omaiamnegmmnashaaty:
The effect of triple antibiotic paste as an intracanal medication with an anti-inflammatory drug on post-operative pain of asymptomatic uniradicular necrotic teeth: a double blind randomized clinical trial.figshare.Dataset.2019.
http://www.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.8276981.v8SoltanoffW:
A comparative study of the single-visit and the multiple-visit endodontic procedure.J Endod.1978;4(9):278–81.
28319310.1016/S0099-2399(78)80144-7GenetJMHartAAWesselinkPR:
Preoperative and operative factors associated with pain after the first endodontic visit.Int Endod J.1987;20(2):53–64.
347172610.1111/j.1365-2591.1987.tb00590.xClemWH:
Posttreatment endodontic pain.J Am Dent Assoc.1970;81(5):1166–70.
527298210.14219/jada.archive.1970.0364AlbashairehZSAlnegrishAS:
Postobturation pain after single- and multiple-visit endodontic therapy. A prospective study.J Dent.1998;26(3):227–32.
959447410.1016/S0300-5712(97)00006-7TorabinejadMKetteringJDMcGrawJC:
Factors associated with endodontic interappointment emergencies of teeth with necrotic pulps.J Endod.1988;14(5):261–6.
325198210.1016/S0099-2399(88)80181-XLundILundebergTSandbergL:
Lack of interchangeability between visual analogue and verbal rating pain scales: a cross sectional description of pain etiology groups.BMC Med Res Methodol.2005;5:31.
1620214910.1186/1471-2288-5-311274324BaltoK:
Single- or multiple-visit endodontics: which technique results in fewest postoperative problems?Evid Based Dent.2009;10(1):16.
1932222310.1038/sj.ebd.6400630AbbottPV:
Medicaments: aids to success in endodontics. Part 2. Clinical recommendations.Aust Dent J.1990;35(6):491–6.
209008010.1111/j.1834-7819.1990.tb04678.xGomesBPSatoEFerrazCC:
Evaluation of time required for recontamination of coronally sealed canals medicated with calcium hydroxide and chlorhexidine.Int Endod J.2003;36(9):604–9.
1295057410.1046/j.1365-2591.2003.00694.xTakushigeTCruzEVAsgor MoralA:
Endodontic treatment of primary teeth using a combination of antibacterial drugs.Int Endod J.2004;37(2):132–8.
1487118010.1111/j.0143-2885.2004.00771.xMokhtariFYazdiKMahabadiAM:
Effect of Premedication with Indomethacin and Ibuprofen on Postoperative Endodontic Pain: A Clinical Trial.Iran Endod J.2016;11(1):57–62.
2684387910.7508/iej.2016.01.0114731535PambooJHansMKKumaraswamyBN:
Incidence and factors associated with flare-ups in a post graduate programme in the indian population.J Clin Exp Dent.2014;6(5):e514–9.
2567431810.4317/jced.515784312678OnayEOUngorMYaziciAC:
The evaluation of endodontic flare-ups and their relationship to various risk factors.BMC Oral Health.2015;15(1):142.
2657709510.1186/s12903-015-0135-24647657SadafDAhmadMZ:
Factors associated with postoperative pain in endodontic therapy.Int J Biomed Sci.2014;10(4):243–7.
255987544289697AlRahabiMK:
Predictors, prevention, and management of postoperative pain associated with nonsurgical root canal treatment: A systematic review.J Taibah Univ Med Sci.2017;12(5):376–84.
10.1016/j.jtumed.2017.03.004AriasAde la MacorraJCHidalgoJJ:
Predictive models of pain following root canal treatment: a prospective clinical study.Int Endod J.2013;46(8):784–93.
2340227310.1111/iej.12059PakJGWhiteSN:
Pain prevalence and severity before, during, and after root canal treatment: a systematic review.J Endod.2011;37(4):429–38.
2141928510.1016/j.joen.2010.12.016MetriMHegdeSBhandiS:
Effect of pretreatment diclofenac sodium on postendodontic pain: A randomised controlled trial.J Conserv Dent.2016;19(1):7–10.
2695778510.4103/0972-0707.1731834760019SharmaNKKindelanJDHutchinsonD:
A study to compare ibuprofen effervescent granules with ibuprofen tablets in the treatment of acute dental pain.Prim Dent Care.1994;1(1):5–8.
8941780SiqueiraJFJrLopesHP:
Mechanisms of antimicrobial activity of calcium hydroxide: a critical review.Int Endod J.1999;32(5):361–9.
1055110910.1046/j.1365-2591.1999.00275.xHaapasaloHKSirénEKWaltimoTM:
Inactivation of local root canal medicaments by dentine: an
in vitro study.Int Endod J.2000;33(2):126–131.
1130745310.1046/j.1365-2591.2000.00291.xErKKuştarciAOzanU:
Nonsurgical endodontic treatment of dens invaginatus in a mandibular premolar with large periradicular lesion: a case report.J Endod.2007;33(3):322–4.
1732072510.1016/j.joen.2006.09.001TanejaSKumariM:
Use of triple antibiotic paste in the treatment of large periradicular lesions.J Investig Clin Dent.2012;3(1):72–6.
2229852510.1111/j.2041-1626.2011.00082.xGomes-FilhoJEDuartePCde OliveiraCB:
Tissue reaction to a triantibiotic paste used for endodontic tissue self-regeneration of nonvital immature permanent teeth.J Endod.2012;38(1):91–4.
2215262810.1016/j.joen.2011.09.020ThibodeauBTeixeiraFYamauchiM:
Pulp revascularization of immature dog teeth with apical periodontitis.J Endod.2007;33(6):680–9.
1750940610.1016/j.joen.2007.03.001BruntonLLLazoJSParkerKL:
Goodman and Gilman's the pharmacological basis of therapeutics. 11th ed. New York: McGraw Hill companies; 2006; 1111–26. (1049–72). 1182–7.
Reference SourceAlamTNakazawaFNakajoK:
Susceptibility of
Enterococcus faecalis to a combination of antibacterial drugs (3 mix)
in vitro.J Oral Biosci.2005;47(4):315–20.
10.1016/S1349-0079(05)80014-3DunstonCRGriffithsHRLambertPA:
Proteomic analysis of the anti-inflammatory action of minocycline.Proteomics.2011;11(1):42–51.
2118219310.1002/pmic.2010002733430857AkcayMArslanHTopcuogluHS:
Effect of calcium hydroxide and double and triple antibiotic pastes on the bond strength of epoxy resin-based sealer to root canal dentin.J Endod.2014;40(10):1663–7.
2526074110.1016/j.joen.2014.05.006AkcayMArslanHYasaB:
Spectrophotometric analysis of crown discoloration induced by various antibiotic pastes used in revascularization.J Endod.2014;40(6):845–8.
2486271410.1016/j.joen.2013.09.019ArslanHCaparIDSaygiliG:
Efficacy of various irrigation protocols on the removal of triple antibiotic paste.Int Endod J.2014;47(6):594–9.
2413838710.1111/iej.12194BerkhoffJAChenPBTeixeiraFB:
Evaluation of triple antibiotic paste removal by different irrigation procedures.J Endod.2014;40(8):1172–7.
2506992710.1016/j.joen.2013.12.02710.5256/f1000research.21605.r66350Reviewer response for version 1SekarMahalaxmi1Refereehttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-7159-8180SelvakumarKritika2Co-referee
Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, SRM Dental College, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
SRM Dental College, Ramapuram, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
Competing interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
This paper is aimed to comparatively evaluate the effectiveness of triple antibiotic paste with the anti-inflammatory drug diclofenac potassium and calcium hydroxide when used as an intra-canal medication in reducing post-operative pain.
Introduction:
Should set the basis of the need for the study, with enough references to mitigate the study.
Please state the lacunae in the current literature as to necessitate your study.
Mention the drawbacks of CH and the rationale of adding Catafast to TAPC.
Mention the aim and objectives in the main text of the manuscript.
Further, the justification for choosing diclofenac over other anti-inflammatory drugs has not been highlighted.
Methodology:
The article describes a novel double-blind randomized clinical trial and the author has clearly explained the process of selection of the subjects. Though the methodology has been elaborately explained, literature evidence reveals the use of TAP in the concentration of 1:1:1 as intracanal medicament, whereas in this study the concentration used is 500mg ciprofloxacin, 500mg metronidazole, 55mg minocycline, and 50mg diclofenac potassium. The low concentration ofdiclofenac used might not justify the role of an anti-inflammatory agent since it may negatively influence the results of the study. In addition, the authors have used commercial calcium hydroxide (metapex) comprising of iodoform which is an antiseptic agent that could also contribute to reducing post-operative pain.
Results:
The pain was recorded at 24, 48, and 72 hours using VAS scale. During this period any participants suffering from pain or swelling both in the intervention and control groups were noted by the author as mentioned in the manuscript. However, the number of participants experiencing these symptoms and who received pharmacological therapy is not mentioned in the article, which might
play a key role in influencing the overall results of the study. The author has analysed the age and gender comparison between the groups, however, the author could have subcategorised the wide age range of 18-50 years and denoted the number of participants falling under each category in the 2 groups, as it would be a major contributory factor.
Discussion:
The intracanal medicaments are usually placed for about a week, the author could have discussed the reasons for choosing a short time interval of 24,48 and 72 hours. The author has substantiated with literature evidence on the use of ibuprofen for pain relief but has chosen diclofenac potassium. The author could have emphasized the use of diclofenac potassium with literature evidence, described the mechanism of action of the drug in improving the efficacy of TAP which would have added more value to the article. The author should have explained the purpose of using a lesser concentration of diclofenac potassium. The reasons for drawing the conclusions are also not clearly dealt with in the manuscript.
Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?
Partly
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?
I cannot comment. A qualified statistician is required.
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?
No
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?
No
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?
Partly
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?
We confirm that we have read this submission and believe that we have an appropriate level of expertise to state that we do not consider it to be of an acceptable scientific standard, for reasons outlined above.
OmaiaMohamedOctober 6 university, Egypt
Competing interests: No competing interset
1862021
Drawbacks of CH and the rationale of adding Catafast to TAPC. had been mentioned in the discussion.
While the mechanism of action of diclofenac potassium had been added to the new version of manuscript.
10.5256/f1000research.21605.r64970Reviewer response for version 1MandavaJyothi1RefereeRaviRavichandra1Co-refereehttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-4099-3938
Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Gandhi Institute of Technology and Management (GITAM) Dental College and Hospital, Visakhapatnam, India
Competing interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
This article is an acceptable scientific standard with some corrections:
The introduction part is not structured well and the flow of the written matter is missing.
The objectives and hypotheses of the study were not discussed.
In the discussion, it was reported that CH group has shown significant correlation between post-operative pain with gender and age of the patients but the statistical analysis was not provided.
Preferable to place definitive conclusions from the outcome of the study.
Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?
Partly
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?
Yes
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?
Partly
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?
Yes
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?
Partly
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?
Yes
Reviewer Expertise:
Remineralization procedures in early carious lesions and in Regenarative procedures
We confirm that we have read this submission and believe that we have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard.
10.5256/f1000research.21605.r55604Reviewer response for version 1KhallafMaram E.1Refereehttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-0743-6387
Restorative and Dental Materials Department, National Research Centre (NRC), Giza, Egypt
Competing interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Article addresses an important point during endodontic treatment which is post operative pain. A sound and clear clinical trial is done representing the true clinical situation.
The use of triple antibiotic paste with the addition of an anti-inflammatory drug showed same results regarding the postoperative pain as calcium hydroxide.
Results of the intracanal bacterial reduction are not clearly shown in the text or discussed. Article needs more recent citations.
Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?
Partly
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?
Yes
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?
Yes
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?
Yes
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?
Yes
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?
Yes
Reviewer Expertise:
Endodontics
I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard, however I have significant reservations, as outlined above.
OmaiaMohamedOctober 6 university, Egypt
Competing interests: No competing interests
172020
Results of intracanal bacterial reduction as secondary outcome will be published in separate article.