F1000Research F1000Research 2046-1402 F1000 Research Limited London, UK 10.12688/f1000research.20610.3 Research Article Articles Frequencies of gastrointestinal parasites among students of primary school in Al Kalakla Locality, Khartoum State, Sudan: a cross-sectional study

[version 3; peer review: 2 approved]

 Abdalazim Hassan Hala Formal Analysis Investigation Methodology 1 Abd Alla Ahmed Bakheet Formal Analysis Writing – Original Draft Preparation https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5463-9892 a 1 Elfaki Tayseer Elamin Mohamed Resources Software Visualization 1 Saad Mohammed Baha Eldin Ahmed Supervision 2 Department of Parasitology and Medical Entomology, College of Medical Laboratory Science, Sudan University of Science and Technology, Khartoum, Khartoum, 11111, Sudan Department of Parasitology and Medical Entomology, College of Medical Laboratory Science, Omdurman Ahlia University, Khartoum, Khartoum, 11111, Sudan ahmed.hassanab@gmail.com

No competing interests were disclosed.

 7 9 2020 2019 8 1719 2 9 2020 Copyright: © 2020 Abdalazim Hassan H et al. 2020 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Background: Intestinal parasite spread in tropical countries is especially common among primary school students. This study aimed to determine the frequencies of the intestinal parasite by different techniques among school students in Alkalakla locality, Khartoum state.

Methods: This study was conducted in school students in Al-kalakla locality in Khartoum state from period between 20th December 2016 to 5th May 2017. Stool samples were collected from 134 randomly selected students, of whom 67 were males and 67 were females. All samples were examined using the wet preparation technique, formal ether concentration technique and saturated sugar floatation technique.

Results: The frequency of intestinal parasites was 35.5% overall in the students examined; females were more affected than males (38.8% and 32.8%, respectively). The more affected age groups were 12–14 years followed by 9–11 and 6–8 years old (53.8%, 36.3% and 26.4% respectively). The least frequent intestinal parasite was Taenia spp. (1.5%) followed by Giardia lamblia (3.7%), Schistosoma mansoni and Ascaris lumbricoides (5.2% each), Entamoeba coli (7.5%), Hymenolepis nana (10.4%), and Entamoeba histolytica (16.4%). In total, 20.9% were infected with single parasite while 14.9% were infected with more than one parasite. The frequency of parasite by formal ether concentration method was 35.8 %, by wet preparation method was 17.9 % and by the saturated sugar flotation method was 16.4%.

Conclusion: Our data showed that intestinal parasites were common in school students; however, females were more affected than males and the 12–14-years age group was the most affected age group. The formal ether concentration method was the best method for detecting of intestinal parasite.

 Al-kalakla E. histolytica H. nana formal ether concentration technique intestinal parasite frequencies Khartoum. The author(s) declared that no grants were involved in supporting this work. Amendments from Version 2

We modified the aim and objective of the study in this version In the Material and Methods section, the first subtitle changed from (Study Background) to (Study Area and Design). In this version we have added that a negative result was obtained when we examined three slides without detecting internal parasite. In this version we have amended the parasite stages which were detected by the technique used in this study.  In the Results section we edited the spelling mistake of word (occuarance) to the right (occurrence).

 Introduction

Intestinal parasites, particularly in tropical and subtropical areas, are a significant health issue 1 . Approximately 3.5 billion individuals are estimated to be impacted in developing nations and 450 million are sick as a consequence of these diseases, the majority being children 2 . Approximately one-quarter of the world's population is infected with intestinal parasites and about 80% of all deaths in developing nations are caused annually by infectious and parasitic illnesses 3 . There is a powerful correlation between the elevated incidence of these diseases and poverty, bad environmental health and insufficient health facilities 3 . Also involved is poor personal hygiene, an unsafe water supply and an absence of health education 4 . The transmission of intestinal parasites is based on characteristics of the parasite, actions of the individual and ecological and biological factors 5 . Transmission occurs by ingestion of contaminated fecal food or water, by hands contaminated with fecal matter coming into contact with the mouth or by skin penetration by larval stage of the parasite following direct contact with contaminated fecal soil 6 . Children of school-age are especially prone to symptoms, sometimes carrying a greater burden of parasites than adults 7 . Diagnosis is routinely performed using a microscope, with fecal samples prepared for microscopy by direct wet mounting or concentration methods. Although direct wet mounting has low sensitivity 8, 9 , it is still used in low- and middle-income countries 9 . There are many methods to concentrate the stages of intestinal parasites; cysts, eggs and larvae can be analyzed as specimens using techniques such as formal ether sedimentation and flotation 10 . These techniques are better than direct wet mounting since they identify more parasites 11 .

 Methods Study area and design

This study is a cross-sectional study conducted in the locality of Al-Kalakla in the state of West Khartoum. This study was carried out between December 2016 and May 2017.

 Study population

The study population was children at a primary school (Saeed primery boys school, Ebaid Khatiem primery boys school, the martyr Abdulsalam primary girls school and Ebaid Khatiem primery girls school), between the ages of 6 and 14. The purpose of the study was explained to the guardians, students and head of school and a total of 134 participants agreed to participate in this study, they were selected randomly. The children were split into three age groups (6–8, 9–11, 12–14 years) and the same number of male and female participants was selected (n=67 of each). A labeled, large-mouth stool container was given to each selected student for collection of fecal samples. Samples were collected during the school day, all samples were subjected to examine by direct smear examination, formal ether concentration technique and Saturated sugar flotation technique.

 Direct smear examination

Wet preparation was achieved by blending a small part of the stool sample taken with a wooden applicator with a drop of normal saline on a slide. The sample was enclosed with a cover slip and systematically examined under a microscope using a 10X lens and elevated magnification 40X lens for further detail observation, after searching for three slides without detecting intestinal parasite, it was considered a negative result.

 Formal ether concentration technique

Approximately 1 g of feces from separate areas of the specimen was gathered and emulsified in glass beaker in 5 ml of formal saline. A further 5 ml were added and mixed from the same solution. The resulting suspension was strained through a strainer. The filtered sample was poured back into a centrifuge tube and an equal quantity of ether was added. The tube was shaken by hand for 1 min and then centrifuged at 2000 rpm for 5 minutes. The upper three layers were removed and the sediment was transported to a slide covered with a cover slip and examined at 10X and 40X magnification under a light microscope.

 Saturated sugar flotation technique

Approximately 100 ml of saturated sugar solution (dextrose) was put into a glass measuring cup and approximately 1 g of stool sample was added. The fecal sample was blended with the saturated sugar solution for flotation. The fecal debris was filtered into another cup and the remaining fluid was drawn out. The preparation that was filtered was poured into a glass test tube. To the top of the tube was added fecal flotation solution. A cover slip was placed on the top of the tube. The pipe remained unchanged for 15 to 30 minutes and the covering glass was closely put on a slide and microscopically examined 12 .

 Identification of parasites

E. histolytica, G. lamblia and Entamoeba coli were identified by presence of a cyst or trophozoite in the stool. Taenia spp., Schistosoma mansoni, Ascaris lumbricoides, and Hymenolepis nana were identified by presence of eggs of each helminth in the stool.

 Data analysis

Data were analyzed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (version 16). Using Chi square test, the significant obtained when P < 0.05. Data were presented in tables.

The sensitivity and specificity of each technique was calculated using the two formulae below:

Sensitivity = positive cases of tested technique positive cases of reference technique × 100

Specifity = negative cases of tested technique negative cases of reference technique × 100

Ethical consideration

Ethical clearance for this study was obtained from Committee of medical laboratory science, Sudan University of Science and Technology, ethical approval number (MLS – IEC – 08 – 16). Written informed consent for participation and publication of the data was obtained from the guardians of all participants included in this study.

 Results Overall occurence of intestinal parasites

Analysis showed that 48 of the 134 stool samples collected from participants were positive for gastrointestinal parasites in Al-kalakla locality, Khartoum state. This was an overall prevalence rate of 35.8%. Infection statuses of all participants, alongside the methods used to identify infection, are available as Underlying data 13 .

 Occurence of intestinal parasite by variables

The research disclosed that in females the occurrence of gastrointestinal parasites was 38.8% while in males it was 32.8%. The difference in gender rates was found to be statistically insignificant (P=0.471; Table 1). Findings showed that age groups 6–8, 9–11 and 12–14 years had parasite prevalence rates of 26.4%, 36.3% and 53.8%, respectively. These variations in rates at P = 0.057 ( Table 2) were statistically insignificant. The prevalence of different parasites was found as follows: E. histolytica (16.4%), H. nana (10.4%), E. coli (7.5%), A. lumbricoides (5.2%), S. mansoni (5.2%), G. lamblia (3.7%) and Taenia spp. (1.5%) ( Table 3). The results showed that 28 (20.9%) were infected with single parasite and that there were 20 infected with more than one parasite (14.9%) ( Table 4).

Prevalence of intestinal parasites among gender.
Gender Number examined Number positive Prevalence (%)
Males 67 22 32.8
Females 67 26 38.8
Total 134 48 35.8

P = 0.471

 Prevalence of intestinal parasite according to age group.
Age group (years) Number examined Number positive Prevalence (%)
6–8 53 14 26.4
9–11 55 20 36.3
12–14 26 14 53.8

P = 0.057

 Prevalence of intestinal parasite according to species.
Parasite Number examined Number positive Prevalence (%)
E. histolytica 134 22 16.4
H. nana 134 14 10.4
E. coli 134 10 7.5
A. lumbricoides 134 7 5.2
S. mansonia 134 7 5.2
G. lamblia 134 5 3.7
Taenia spp. 134 2 1.5
Prevalence of intestinal parasite according to type of infection.
Type of infection Number examined Number positive Prevalence (%)
Single 134 28 20.9
Mixed 134 20 14.9
Correlation between parasitological techniques

The frequency of gastrointestinal parasites by various parasitological methods was as follows: 35.8% by formal concentration method, 17.9% by the wet preparation method and 16.4% by the saturated sugar flotation method. A comparison between the detection rate of each method found that detection rates were significantly different (P = 0.000; Table 5).

Correlation between parasitological techniques.
Parasitological technique Number examined Number positive Prevalence
Wet preparation technique 134 24 17.9%
Formal ether concentration technique 134 48 35.8%
Saturated sugar flotation 134 22 16.4%

P = 0.000

 Sensitivity and specificity of techniques compared with formal ether

Assuming that the formal ether concentration technique was the gold standard, the sensitivity and specificity of the wet preparation technique was 50% and 100% respectively, and the sensitivity and specificity of the saturated sugar flotation technique was 45% and 100%, respectively ( Table 6).

Sensitivity and specificity of techniques compared with formal ether.
Technique Formal ether concentration technique Total Sensitivity specificity
+ve -ve 50% 100%
Wet preparation technique +ve 24 0 24
-ve 24 86 110
Total 48 86 134
Saturated sugar floatation technique +ve 22 0 22 45% 100%
-ve 26 86 112
Total 48 86 134
Discussion

It was evident from the results that the overall prevalence of gastrointestinal parasites among children's schools (Saeed primery boys school, Ebaid Khatiem primery boys school, the martyr Abdulsalam primary girls school and Ebaid Khatiem primery girls school), in Al-kalakla was high (35.8%) and was found to be higher than the rate reported by Muhajir et al. (2017) in Alkalakal (30%) 14 . Nevertheless, our rate was found to be lower than that reported by Gabbad and Elawad (2014) in Elengaz, Sudan (64.4%) 15 . The study found that females had a slightly higher occurrence of gastrointestinal parasites (38.8%) than males (32.8%). This finding was not aligned with Muhajir et al. (2017) in Al-kalakla, which found higher rates of infection in males (16.5%) compared to females (13.5%) 14 .

The highest prevalence rate (53.8%) among the 12–14 age group was reported in this study. This rate did not agree with that of Magambo et al. in Southern Sudan, who reported the most affected age group was those 6–10 years 16 . The higher occurrence of gastrointestinal parasite may be due to student’s hygiene and lack of adequate water cycle in these schools.

The findings of this study indicated that the common gastrointestinal parasites in children's schools were E. histolytica (16.4%), H. nana (10.4%), E. coli (7.5%), A. lumbricoids (5.2%), S. mansoni (5.2%), G. Lamblia (3.7%) and Taenia spp. (1.5%), while Muhajir et al. reported E. histolytica the most common gastrointestinal parasites in Al-kalakla (15.5%), G. lamblia (12.5%), H. nana (1.5%) and S. mansoni (0.5%) 14 . However, Gabbad and Elawad in Elengaz, Sudan, revealed that G. lamblia was the predominant gastrointestinal parasite (33.4%), followed by H. nana (26.4%), T. saginata (8.6%), Enterobius vermicularis (6.2%), S. mansoni (4.4%) and E. histolytics (3.6 %) 15 .

As far as the detection levels for the three methods used were concerned, it was evident that the best detection rate (35.8%) was recorded for the formal ether concentration method and the lowest rate (16.4%) was recorded for the saturated sugar flotation method, while the wet preparation method showed a detection rate of 17.9%. Our results on formal ether were not in agreement with Eisa in Keryab Village, Sudan, who reported a 90% detection rate 17 . However, the detection rate reported in our study was lower than the detection rate reported by Eman (44%) 18 .

The study found that the detection rate for wet preparation (17.9%) was lower than the detection rate reported by Eman (41.4%) in Southern Sudan 18 . Furthermore, detection rate for saturated sugar flotation technique (16.4%) was lower than the detection rate for Duria in Khartoum, Sudan, reported (58.6%) 18 .

Surprisingly, the findings showed a sensitivity of 50% and a high specificity (100%) of the wet preparation method and a sensitivity of 45% and a high specificity (100%) of the saturated sugar flotation method. This could probably be attributed to severe intestinal parasite infections among subjects studied in this study.

 Conclusion

From the outcomes, it can be concluded that gastrointestinal parasites are common among children's schools in Al-kalakla, Khartoum state. Furthermore, prevalence rate was significantly greater among females, the highest rates of infection were recorded in the 12–14-years age group and, lastly, the formal ether concentration method showed the highest sensitivity level for the identification of distinct gastrointestinal parasites.

 Data availability Underlying data

Figshare: Hala and Ahmed file.sav. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.9804869.v1 13 .

This project contains the following underlying data:

Hala and Ahmed file.sav (parasites detected in stool samples for each child, with method used to detect them)

Data dictionary (2).docx

Data are available under the terms of the Creative Commons Zero “No rights reserved” data waiver (CC0 1.0 Public domain dedication).

 Acknowledgements

We would like to express our immense gratitude and appreciation to the department of parasitology and medical entomology staff of Sudan University of Science and Technology, also to the school manager and the all participant in this study.

 Damen JG Luka J Biwan EI : Prevalence of Intestinal Parasites among Pupils in Rural North Eastern, Nigeria. Niger Med J. 2011;52(1):4–6. 21969128 3180756 Wegayehu T Tsalla T Seifu B : Prevalence of intestinal parasitic infections among highland and lowland dwellers in Gamo area, South Ethiopia. BMC Public Health. 2013;13(1):151. 23419037 10.1186/1471-2458-13-151 3584849 Al-Braiken FA : Is intestinal parasitic infection still a public health concern among Saudi children? Saudi Med J. 2008;29(11):1630–1635. 18998015 Barkhori Mahni M Rezaeian M Kia EB : Prevalence of Intestinal Parasitic Infections in Jiroft, Kerman Province, Iran. Iran J Parasitol. 2016;11(2):232–238. 28096858 5236101 Harhay MO Horton J Olliaro PL : Epidemiology and control of human gastrointestinal parasites in children. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2010;8(2):219–234. 20109051 10.1586/eri.09.119 2851163 Abdulkadir A Ahmed M Abubakar BM : Prevalence of urinary schistosomiasis in Nigeria, 1994–2015: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Afr J Urol. 2017;23(4):228–239. 10.1016/j.afju.2016.11.004 Cook DM Swanson RC Eggett DL : A retrospective analysis of prevalence of gastrointestinal parasites among school children in the Palajunoj Valley of Guatemala. J Health Popul Nutr. 2009;27(1):31–40. 19248646 10.3329/jhpn.v27i1.3321 2761809 Hailu T Abera B : Performance evaluation of direct saline stool microscopy, Formol ether concentration and Kato Katz diagnostic methods for intestinal parasitosis in the absence of gold standard methods. Trop Doct. 2015;45(3):178–182. 25883063 10.1177/0049475515581127 Bayoumi M Nykwac O Kardaman M : Intestinal Parasitic Infections in School Students in Malakal City, Upper Nile State, South Sudan. SOJ Microbiol Inf Dis. 2016;4(1):1–5. 10.15226/sojmid/4/1/00142 Mohamed MM Ahmed AI Salah ET : Frequency of intestinal parasitic infections among displaced children in Kassala Town. Khartoum Medical Journal. 2012;2(1):175–177. Reference Source Van Gool T Weijts R Lommerse E : Triple Faeces Test: an effective tool for detection of intestinal parasites in routine clinical practice. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2003;22(5):284–290. 12736794 10.1007/s10096-003-0919-1 Scullion FT Scullion MG : Gastrointestinal protozoal diseases in reptiles. J Exot Pet Med. 2009;18(4):266–278. 10.1053/j.jepm.2009.09.004 Alla AA Hassan HA : Hala and Ahmed file.sav. figshare. Dataset.2019. http://www.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.9804869.v1 Muhajir AEM Hajissa K Mohamed Z : Prevalence of Intestinal Parasitic Infection among Children in Al-kalakla, Khartoum, Sudan. World Appl Sci J. 2017;35(2):219–22. Reference Source Gabbad AA Elawad MA : Prevalence of intestinal parasite infection in primary school children in Elengaz area, Khartoum, Sudan. Academic Research International. 2014;5(2):86. Reference Source Magambo JK Zeyhle E Wachira TM : Prevalence of intestinal parasites among children in southern Sudan. East Afr Med J. 1998;75(5):288–290. 9747000 Eisa IM : The efficiency of different technique in the detection of intestinal parasites in school children in Keryab village, Khartoum state. M.Sc. thesis, AlzaimAlazhari University.2005. Ahmed HAH : Prevalence rate of intestinal parasites among schools children in Al-kalakla locality-Khartoum state (Doctoral dissertation, Sudan University of Science & Technology).2017. Reference Source 10.5256/f1000research.23392.r66823 Reviewer response for version 2 Oyegue-Liabagui Sandrine Lydie 1 2 Referee Ecole Doctorale d’Afrique Centrale en Infectiologie Tropicale de Franceville (ECODRAC), Université des Sciences et Techniques de Masuku, Franceville, Gabon Unité d’Evolution, Epidémiologie et Résistances Parasitaires (UNEEREP), Centre International de Recherches Médicales de Franceville CIRMF), Franceville, Gabon

Competing interests: No competing interests were disclosed.

 28 8 2020 Copyright: © 2020 Oyegue-Liabagui SL 2020 This is an open access peer review report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. recommendation approve

Background

The study evaluates the frequencies of the intestinal parasite among primary school students.

The authors do not clearly present the objective of their work. Rather, they have the best techniques for identifying more parasites. The question then arises whether the aim of this work is the evaluation of parasite identification techniques or the determination of the prevalence of intestinal parasites among children of school age.

Therefore that the authors clearly indicate the objective of the study.

Materials and Methods

Study background: This paragraph describes the type, location, and period of study. It might be more suitable to name it “Study area and Design”.

Direct smear examination: in this paragraph, please indicate when the sample is considered negative.

Identification of parasites: This paragraph "Identification of parasites" should be included in the description of the methods used. e.g.: this method is used to detect eggs, cysts, vegetative forms, etc.

  

Results:

Overall occurrence of intestinal parasites: replace “occurrance” by occurrence.

It would be more interesting to correctly describe the prevalence of each intestinal parasite. Which parasite is most prevalent in the general population?

Occurrence of intestinal parasite by variables: By age group what types of parasites are found? As far as the analysis of prevalence by age group is concerned, it would also have been interesting to make a pair-wise comparison, analysing the groups two by two using the Mann-Whitney test.

The authors only indicate that there were 20 people infected with more than one parasite. However, they do not make any mention of the different polyinfections observed in the infected study participants. Therefore, a more detailed analysis of the observed polyinfections would be necessary.

  

Discussion:

There is not much discussion about the distribution of parasites by age group and why the 12-14 year old age group is the most infected as opposed to the youngest, who seem to be the least attentive to hygiene measures .

Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?

Yes

If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?

Yes

Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?

Yes

Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?

Yes

Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?

Yes

Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?

Yes

Reviewer Expertise:

NA

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard.

 10.5256/f1000research.23392.r57060 Reviewer response for version 2 Nepal Hari Prasad 2 Referee https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6275-0825 Paudel Rama 1 Co-referee Trinity Medical Sciences University, Kingstown, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines Department of Microbiology, School of Medicine, Trinity School of Medicine, Kingstown, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines

Competing interests: No competing interests were disclosed.

 2 12 2019 Copyright: © 2019 Paudel R and Nepal HP 2019 This is an open access peer review report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. recommendation approve

The previous comments have been addressed in the second version of the manuscript.

Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?

Partly

If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?

Partly

Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?

Partly

Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?

Partly

Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?

Partly

Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?

Partly

Reviewer Expertise:

Infectious diseases (including parasitic diseases), antimicrobial resistance, and medical education

We confirm that we have read this submission and believe that we have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard.

 10.5256/f1000research.22663.r55524 Reviewer response for version 1 Nepal Hari Prasad 2 Referee https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6275-0825 Paudel Rama 1 Co-referee Trinity Medical Sciences University, Kingstown, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines Department of Microbiology, School of Medicine, Trinity School of Medicine, Kingstown, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines

Competing interests: No competing interests were disclosed.

 23 10 2019 Copyright: © 2019 Paudel R and Nepal HP 2019 This is an open access peer review report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. recommendation approve-with-reservations

The study provides basic information about the frequencies of gastrointestinal parasites among children of a school in Sudan. The findings of this study may be useful to people of public health interest in the local region but can not be generalised. The following observations were noted while reviewing this manuscript:

Title:

Since the study:

a. detects only the intestinal parasites,

b. does not reveal anything about the clinical symptoms of parasitic infections and

c. involves children of only one school, the title should be changed to 'Frequencies of gastrointestinal parasites among students of a primary school in Al Kalakla Locality, Khartoum State, Sudan: a cross-sectional study'.

Methods:

Study population: The authors should clearly mention how the sampling was determined and how each of the participants was selected (e.g, random sampling).

Identification of parasites: The information  (whole paragraph) about identification of parasites should be mentioned/moved after the last concentration method (i.e just before data analysis).

Saturated sugar flotation technique: The first and second sentences can be joined with removal of full stop after first sentence and use of 'and' 3rd line: 'sample of fecal' should be 'fecal sample'.

Data analysis: specificity should be determined by multiplication of the fraction by 100 (not by 10).

The authors should clearly mention (under 'Methods') whether all the samples were subject to examination by all the three methods in the study. 

 Results

The term 'occurrence' would be better than 'prevalence' (which has its specific epidemiological meaning) in the title/contents of first two paragraphs.

3rd line of 2nd paragraph: 'years' should be added after the age groups mentioned (i.e, 6–8, 9–11 and 12–14  years). 

Discussion

First sentence: The study done at one school can not be generalised.  This sentence can be restructured as 'It was evident from the results that the overall occurrence of gastrointestinal parasites among children of a school (school name can be mentioned) in Al-kalakla was high........ 

The study needs to discuss the reasons for higher occurrence: 

a. of the parasites in this study compared to that of other studies,

b.of the parasites in females compared in males

c. of the parasites in 12–14 years of age group compared in other age groups. 

 Conclusion:

The study done at one school can not be generalised. The authors can note the first comment made under 'discussion' and conclude accordingly.

Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?

Partly

If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?

Partly

Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?

Partly

Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?

Partly

Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?

Partly

Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?

Partly

Reviewer Expertise:

Infectious diseases (including parasitic diseases), antimicrobial resistance, and medical education

We confirm that we have read this submission and believe that we have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard, however we have significant reservations, as outlined above.