Amendments from Version 1

F1000Research

2046-1402

F1000 Research Limited

London, UK

10.12688/f1000research.26378.2

Research Article

Articles

Healthcare providers’ perspective on barriers to optimal HIV index testing: an interview-based study

[version 2; peer review: 1 approved, 1 approved with reservations]

Katamba

Cibangu

Conceptualization Data Curation Formal Analysis Funding Acquisition Investigation Methodology Project Administration Resources Software Supervision Validation Visualization Writing – Original Draft Preparation Writing – Review & Editing https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8109-1669 a 1 1Lusaka Provincial Health Office, Lusaka, Zambia

a patrickkatamba@gmail.com

No competing interests were disclosed.

16 2 2023

2020

1258

6 2 2023

2023

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Background: HIV testing services (HTS) and antiretroviral therapy have seen a substantial scale-up. Poorly targeted HTS have continued to miss people living with HIV who do not know their HIV status. This requires new and targeted approaches to reach undiagnosed people with HIV, such as HIV partner services. The aim of this study was to assess the barriers to optimal index testing for improved HIV testing yield in Lusaka, Zambia.

Methods: One-to-one interviews were conducted with index testing providers to explore provider-related and client-related barriers to testing, and document other experiences arising during the process of HIV index testing. An interview guide was utilized for consistency of information collected.

Results: Provider related challenges included inadequate elicitation skills among healthcare workers; low number of volunteers trained in index testing; inadequate index testing knowledge among staff; age and sex differences; limited elicitation of index partners to only wife and husband (not eliciting all sexual partners); and limited transport for contact tracing. On the other hand, client-related challenges were mobile communities due to seasonal activities such as cross boarder trades, sex work and farming; some key populations and adolescent index clients do not have contact details for their casual relationships; provider’s age or gender difference for some clients; missing details on client locator forms or wrong details provided; stigma and discrimination; and limited space dedicated to conduct elicitation of index clients.

Discussion: The challenges identified have future implications for index partner testing. These barriers were also gender and age specific. HIV testing services need to adapt to the social context of Zambia where HIV-related stigma and discrimination is still a challenge. As Zambia makes significant progress towards achieving HIV epidemic control, more effort is needed to address specific barriers to optimal HIV index testing.

Healthcare Provider Barriers HIV Index Testing

The author(s) declared that no grants were involved in supporting this work.

Revised Amendments from Version 1

The timing of the study in Zambia was mentioned in the introduction. The report from several clinical trials shows that index partner testing can increase the uptake of HTS and identify partners with undiagnosed infection (yield ranges from 35% to 62%): without explicitly comparing it to baseline. We defined index testing and referenced all the texts accordingly. The data management and analysis section has now clarified that any disagreements were resolved through discussion with another study staff member. Table 1 was further summarized, removing information that could potentially make it easy for participants’ identity to be decoded. All healthcare workers and counsellors who were involved in index testing services are index testing providers and their roles were defined. Other healthcare workers who provide other healthcare services but not index testing are not part of index testing providers. The results, discussion, and conclusion were significantly revised to align with each other.

Introduction

Global HIV testing services (HTS) and antiretroviral therapy have seen a substantial scale up ¹. About 15 years ago, only an estimated 12% of the global population who required an HIV test were tested, and only 10% of people living with HIV (PLHIV) knew their HIV status in Africa ¹. It is now estimated that about 80% of PLHIV, and nearly 85% of PLHIV in southern and eastern Africa, know their HIV status, by the end of 2019 ¹. While this progress has been registered, poorly targeted HTS have continued to miss PLHIV who do not know their HIV status in many settings ¹. This requires new and targeted approaches to reach undiagnosed people with HIV, such as HIV partner services ¹.

A study conducted in Zambia in 2020 revealed that index testing coupled with targeted community-led HTS are useful strategies to diagnose men living with HIV ². Many studies have shown that index partner testing has the potential to increase HTS uptake, and identify and diagnose HIV infected partners (yield ranging from 35% to 62% without reported intimate partner violence) ³. However, there are barriers to effective HIV index testing, for instance difficulties in notifying past or casual partners for both male and female index cases ⁴. Disease symptoms are a motivating factor for HIV testing for men as well as women. Studies have shown that gender determinants, such as tolerant attitudes about intimate partner violence and unequal power dynamics within relationships, have noticeable effects for men and women on deciding to get tested for HIV ⁵. Gender-specific barriers for female index clients to successful referral include the following: women face gender roles and inequalities in relationships such as lack of education, lack of resources or ability to access services; fear of abandonment, violence or other abuse associated with partner notification ^{4,
6,
7}. Therefore, they may need additional support to overcome challenges in the partner notification process. Antenatal care exposure makes women more likely to get tested for HIV. For men, especially those in sub-Saharan Africa, the following challenges to HIV testing and disclosure have been previously noted: stigma, gender and social roles prescribing that men should be healthy, strong, and dominant ^{8,
9}. Studies have shown that men, compared to women, underestimate their level of risk of HIV infection ⁷. However, once men are tested, they may be more likely to disclose their HIV status ⁷. Some men believe that their role of breadwinner for the family protects them from rejection when disclosing their HIV positive status ¹⁰.

Effective approaches to HIV testing are needed to reach undiagnosed people and link them to HIV care and treatment as part of the UNAIDS 90-90-90 goals ¹¹. As defined by UNAIDS ¹², Index testing, also referred to as partner testing/partner notification services, is an approach whereby the exposed contacts (sexual partners, biological children and anyone with whom a needle was shared) of an HIV-positive person (index client), are elicited and offered HIV testing services. Understanding barriers to index testing is crucial for planning appropriate interventions to improve HIV testing yield and to provide appropriate care for both index clients and their partners. In this context, the aim of this study was to assess the barriers to optimal index testing for improved HIV testing yield in Lusaka, an urban district of Zambia. The specific objectives are: 1) to understand the perceived facilitators and barriers to HIV partner testing from the perspective of the health-care provider; 2) to propose interventions necessary for improved HIV case finding.

Methods Study design

An explanatory qualitative study design was used. One-to-one interviews were employed to explore index testing providers’ views on barriers and other experiences arising during the process of HIV index testing. An interview guide was utilized for consistency of information collected. The aim of this study was to assess the barriers to optimal index testing for improved HIV testing yield in Lusaka urban district of Zambia.

Study setting

The study was facility based, conducted at Matero First Level Hospital, Matero Main Clinic, and George Health Centre in Matero sub-district of Lusaka, Zambia. This study was conducted between January and March 2020.

Participants were interviewed face-to-face during their free time to avoid disruption of services.

Study population

HIV index testing providers involved in patient care and management were interviewed. A total of 18 key informant interviews were conducted with two medical officers, two head of HIV testing services departments, three health systems strengthening nurses, five index community liaison officers, and six index testing counselors. A saturation of findings was used to guide the sample size.

Eighteen participants in the qualitative component of the study were selected on a convenience basis from the index testing services providers. There are more female HTS providers than their male counterparts in Matero sub-district; therefore, one third quota was given to male participants to ensure gender representability. The index providers were selected from male and female index testing services providers who have been providing index testing for more than one year.

Index providers were selected by the principal investigator (PI) who is trained in qualitative and quantitative studies for participation in a face to face interview on a convenience basis. A rough quota was given to each facility, balancing out male and female participants, and those providers who were invited to participate, agreed and consented were interviewed.

Everyone approached to participate were interviewed. No repeat interviews were carried out. Field notes were made during and after the interviews ( Underlying data ¹³). The summary was read back to the participants to ensure validation.

Data sources, variables and collection

HIV index testing providers were interviewed by the PI. It was an onsite (at the medical facilities), face-to-face interview, conducted in English, and audio-recorded using an ‘audio-recorder’ application after obtaining consent from participants. Only the participant and the PI were present during the key informant interview. An interview guide ( Extended data ¹⁴) was used to explore the challenges and make suggestions for improving index contact testing outcome for HIV. The interview guide consisted of open ended questions and probes prepared for various healthcare providers.

Characteristics of the interviewer

The PI is a qualified male medical doctor and has a Master’s degree in Public Health. He is currently a PhD candidate, conducting research for his doctorate thesis in Public Health. The purpose of the research was explained to participant prior to the interview. Participants were provided information sheet to explain the purpose and usage of the study findings.

Data management and analysis

Audio-recorded interviews were transcribed verbatim on the same day by the PI. A descriptive content analysis by manual coding was performed by two independent, trained researchers (HIV/TB mentors) to generate categories or themes. These were reviewed by the PI to avoid subjective bias and strengthen interpretive credibility. Any disagreements were resolved through discussion with another study staff member.

Ethics approval

Participants gave their written informed consent to be interviewed on the understanding that data would be reported in de-identified form to prevent the identification of all key informants.

Permission to conduct research was obtained from the Lusaka Provincial Health Office before the commencement of the study. Ethical clearance was sought and obtained from the ERES Converge Zambian Institutional Review Board (IRB; Ref. No. 2019 – Nov – 009). Authority to conduct research was also sought from the National Health Research Authority.

Reporting of the methods and results comply with the consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative studies (COREQ) checklist ¹⁵. A completed COREQ checklist is available here ¹⁶.

Results

A total of 18 index testing providers from three health facilities (Matero first level hospital, George health centre, and Matero main clinic) participated in the study. The interviewees were: two medical officers, two head of HIV testing services departments, three health systems strengthening nurses, five index community liaison officers, and six index testing counselors (See Table 1 below).

Table 1. Demographics of the 18 index providers interviewed.

#	PROVIDER’ JOB TITLE	AGE	SEX	Interview duration (minutes)
1	Community liaison officer	42	Female	15
2	Counselor	38	Female	15
3	Health Systems Strengthening Nurse	51	Female	16
4	HTS Head of department	39	Female	18
5	Counselor	28	Female	18
6	Counselor	32	Female	22
7	Community liaison officer	43	Female	20
8	Community liaison officer	26	Female	18
9	Community liaison officer	24	Male	15
10	Counselor	35	Female	21
11	Community liaison officer	36	Male	16
12	Counselor	42	Male	14
13	HTS Head of department	45	Male	24
14	Health Systems Strengthening Nurse	49	Female	14
15	Counselor	35	Female	19
16	Health Systems Strengthening Nurse	33	Female	32
17	Medical Officer	39	Male	18
18	Medical Officer	28	Male	17

HTS: HIV Testing Service

Major activities of an index testing provider in the past one year included ensuring that all newly tested HIV clients were listed, counseling was provided to them on partner notification service, elicitation of sexual contacts, contact tracing, testing of contacts and linkage of positive contacts to care.

“My major activities concerning index is if we find a positive, making sure that the client is indexed and elicitation is supposed to be done also. If the client says that I have got sexual contacts, I am supposed to book those sexual contacts and follow them either at home or at the facility if the client agrees to bring them”. (Participant 1)

Index testing workers worked together with other providers and implementing partners to provide index testing. Specifically, index testing providers from respective facilities worked hand in hand with program implementation partners to ensure activities were coordinated.

“For index testing to work, we need a multidisciplinary team. In working with other, being a nurse by profession, I need to work with counselors as I also provide testing. We need to identify people who are very skillful, who can spend more time with the client to get information on their contacts”. (Participant 16)

There were many successes or experiences reported by respondents arising from index testing. Providers were open to share their experiences and lessons learned while providing services.

“My experience or successful story it was one time when we had a session with a certain index client. That client was able to open up and give us 6 contacts of whom 5 tested positive and 1 negative. That person was polygamous”. (Participant 1)

“Through index testing, there was a certain man who had tested 7 years ago. When he came he was not feeling well. After we tested he said in the eyes of the public he only has one sexual partner (his wife). According to him he is a God fearing man. After eliciting we discovered that he had 3 extra girlfriends. Little by little after interacting with him those names were given to me. After that he said he may not be able to disclose to them because they will suspect that he may have infected them….” (Participant 12)

Barriers and facilitators to effective index testing were also identified by respondents.

“The index client may give you the correct contact information. But the contact might have lied to the index client. …hard to reach clients that are out of town (Lusaka) or out of the country. …the contact, when followed, two of them have really brought up their religious believes strongly: “you are not going to test me, I cannot do an HIV test, I don’t believe in HIV”. (Participant 7)

“Like earlier mentioned, index testing is a concept that is new. It is a concept that was not long ego embedded in our understanding as healthcare providers. One of the barriers in delivering this service has been its acceptance among healthcare workers or among facility based workers as well as community based workers. Because we have had to ask on sexual contacts from clients that come out positive. And looking at our culture, it is one thing that we don’t easily talk about to bring out sexual relations to clients. Many staff tend to bring out they traditions, they cultural believes, they religious believes when it comes to them getting sexual partners. It has limited the number of sexual partners that we are getting from the client…” (Participant 16)

Specific challenges related to index clients’ identification and elicitation of index contacts. Some clients did not open up easily (as this was the first time to meet a counselor) or immediately and others were not providing full contact information. This was usually resolved within two weeks of follow-up, as clients become more comfortable interacting with ART providers.

“One of the challenges of finding positives when doing index is most clients do not open up easily. Being the first time of meeting you as a counselor they can’t open up just there and then. And then the other thing when it comes to elicitation, we elicit the client, you will find that when calling the sexual contacts, you are asked questions like where did you get my contact from? It is not everyone who will agree right there and then. It is not a one-day thing if I may say”.

“… elicitation on the other hand is a skill. So one big challenge is they are very few staff who are skillful when it comes to elicitation. So you will find out that if you have a client in front of you, but if you don’t have the skill and if you do not perfect this skill, the client will be in front of you but you will not be able to get out this information from them”. (Participant 16)

Specific challenges related to testing of index contacts. Various logistic challenges were noted with regards to tracing and testing of contacts.

“Number 1, transport must be readily available at all times. Number 2, … in short I can say logistics must be available at all times. If one says right now I have left my wife at home. If at all you are ready let’s go together so that you can test her. You will find that we don’t have transport at the facility at that particular time. The time you will be calling the client maybe he will say this time she is not around, maybe she is busy with something else. We know these clients; they’ve got a lot of things to do beside accessing services from the hospital”. (Participant 1)

Perceived factors causing/contributing to sub-optimal index testing were reported as gender, age, stigma, social status, health system, facility structure, staff, and skill level.

“…when it comes to age, this is another challenge because elicitation is also age sensitive. By this I mean you cannot get a youth to elicit from a senior citizen for example who is maybe above 65. They will perceive the youth as a young boy or a young girl who has no concept of living, and they would close up on giving information….” (Participant 16)

Overall, the barriers to accessing HTS were divided into provider- and client-related challenges. Provider-related challenges: Inadequate elicitation skills among the newly trained community healthcare workers, treatment supporters and counsellors; trained providers such as healthcare workers not fully involved; age and sex differences (provider Vs client); low number of volunteers trained in index testing; inadequate index testing knowledge among staff; limiting elicitation of index partners to only wife and husband (not eliciting all sexual partners); and limited transport for contact tracing (long distances to reach contacts). Client-related challenges: Mobile communities due to seasonal activities such as cross boarder trades (e.g. truck drivers), sex work and farming; some index clients do not live in the same district/town as the index clients; key populations and adolescents index clients do not have contact details for some of their contacts; provider’s age or gender difference for some clients; missing details on client locator forms or wrong details provided; and limited space dedicated to conduct elicitation of index clients (lack of privacy).

Barriers to partner notification services also included concerns around privacy/confidentiality, stigma and discrimination, and intimate partner violence. Lack of awareness of risk for HIV infection/misconceptions; structural, psychological, financial, were barriers to being tested.

Discussion

These findings are in keeping with evidence from other studies ^{2–
5}, that showed that non-disclosure of HIV status (due to fear of marital discord), non-disclosure and under-disclosure of the number of sexual partners by the index clients, fear of negative consequences, difficulties notifying past or casual partners, geography/remote partners, and risk perception were major barriers for using testing services. Key populations and people with casual partners were less able or willing to identify partners.

Following the interviews with key informants, the following were proposed as solutions to address identified challenges:

(1)

Peer pairing approach using experienced counselors and hand holding mentorship; Pairing treatment supporters to newly tested HIV positives clients for index testing and treatment support;

(2)

Training facility-based volunteers and healthcare workers (Nurses, Clinical officers, Medical officers etc.) in index testing;

(3)

Setting up network of counselors to reach contacts not in the same catchment as the index clients;

(4)

Provide transport to follow up clients (index contacts): additional vehicles needed or support transport refunds;

(5)

Identify and allocate dedicated space for elicitation using experience counsellors;

(6)

Improve appointment system: after hours, weekends and men’s clinics;

(7)

Ensure correct, complete and consistent documentation in all registers.

These innovativive corrective actions need urgent implementation to help address identified challenges in this context. In 2020, USAID proposed a few more interventions following analysis of data from HIV counseling and testing services in Burkinafaso ¹⁷, including:

(1)

Setting up a mechanism to motivate the actors, including mediators, and establishing a logistics system capable of reaching a maximum number of contact cases and transporting them to testing sites

(2)

Building staff skills in index testing and motivational interviewing

(3)

Involving the community structures that partner with public sites to locate case contacts

Strengths and limitations of the research

Some studies have tackled the issues of barriers to successfully referring partners for testing ^{4,
9}, but were not specific to gender or age. Alternative strategies to target and provide acceptable and accessible HIV testing services to gender and age-specific populations are addressed in this study. This study also addresses the gap of limited literature on HIV index testing in developing settings.

We used convenience sampling to explore barriers and facilitators of index testing. One other limitation was that the key informants in this research were only healthcare providers. The perspective of HIV positive clients themselves was not explored in this study to balance the information bias.

Conclusion

The challenges identified have future implications for index partner testing. These barriers were also gender and age specific. HIV testing services need to adapt to the social context of Zambia where HIV-related stigma and discrimination is still a challenge. HIV programs need to explore and address barriers to HIV partner testing services to maximize HIV case identification. As Zambia makes significant progress towards achieving HIV epidemic control, more effort is needed to reach specific high risk, but hard to reach populations in HIV programs, such as men, adolescent girls and young women.

Data availability Underlying data

The underlying data for this study is the audio recordings of the participants. Since participants may be identified from their voices, the data cannot be shared in order to protect participant identity. De-identified field notes are instead provided, along with quotes in the article, as intermediary data. If readers would like to access the underlying data, they can contact the corresponding author who will facilitate access to the data. Conditions for access: submission of a proposal for how researchers will use the data.

Harvard Dataverse: Replication Data for: HEALTHCARE PROVIDERS’ PERSPECTIVE ON BARRIERS TO OPTIMAL HIV INDEX TESTING, https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/FHNY2V ¹³.

This project contains the following underlying data:

Field Notes

Extended data

Harvard Dataverse: Replication Data for: HEALTHCARE PROVIDERS’ PERSPECTIVE ON BARRIERS TO OPTIMAL HIV INDEX TESTING, https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/BUXS2X ¹⁴.

This project contains the following extended data:

Interview guide.

Reporting guidelines

Harvard Dataverse: COREQ checklist for ‘Healthcare providers’ perspective on barriers to optimal HIV index testing: an interview-based study’, https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/CFZX0N ¹⁶.

Data are available under the terms of the Creative Commons Zero “No rights reserved” data waiver (CC0 1.0 Public domain dedication).

Acknowledgments

The author would like to thank the Lusaka Provincial Health Office (LPHO), the Lusaka District Health Office leadership, the Matero Health Management teams, and PEPFAR through the LPHO/CDC CoAg for their leadership and support during this study. Special thanks to my colleagues (medical mentors) for their support during the creation of themes. I also thank the study participants who consented and participated in this investigation. I am also grateful to Dr. Monde Muyoyeta for her supervision, guidance and support.

World Health Organization: Consolidated guidelines on HIV testing services for a changing epidemic.2019. Reference Source

Mwango

Stafford

Blanco

: Index and targeted community-based testing to optimize HIV case finding and ART linkage among men in Zambia. J Int AIDS Soc. 2020;23 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):e25520. 32589360

10.1002/jia2.25520

7319128

Partner and Family based Index case testing. A Standard Operating Procedure (SOP). Reference Source

Plotkin

Kahabuka

Christensen

: Outcomes and Experiences of Men and Women with Partner Notification for HIV Testing in Tanzania: Results from a Mixed Method Study. AIDS Behav. 2018;22(1):102–116. 29090397

10.1007/s10461-017-1936-x

5758678

Gari

Malungo

JRS

Martin-Hilber

: HIV testing and tolerance to gender based violence: a cross-sectional study in Zambia. PLoS One. 2013;8(8):e71922. 23991005

10.1371/journal.pone.0071922

3749220

World Health Organization: HIV status disclosure to sexual partners: rates, barriers, and outcomes for women. Geneva;2003. Reference Source

Obermeyer

Osborn

: The utilization of testing and counseling for HIV: a review of the social and behavioral evidence. Am J Public Health. 2007;97(10):1762–1774. 17761565

10.2105/AJPH.2006.096263

1994175

Selvaraj

Kumar

AMV

Chawla

: Are partners of HIV-infected people being tested for HIV? A mixed-methods research from Gujarat, India. Public Health Action. 2017;7(1):46–54. 28775943

10.5588/pha.16.0094

5526482

Skovdal

Campbell

Madanhire

: Masculinity as a barrier to men's use of HIV services in Zimbabwe. Global Health. 2011;7:13. 21575149

10.1186/1744-8603-7-13

3107786

Obermeyer

Sankara

Bastien

: Gender and HIV testing in Burkina Faso: an exploratory study. Soc Sci Med. 2009;69(6):877–884. 19631435

10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.07.003

4260152

UNAIDS: 90– 90– 90 - An ambitious treatment target to help end the AIDS epidemic. Reference Source

UNAIDS: Indicator registry: (HTS_Index) Number of individuals who were identified and tested using Index testing services and received their results. Reference Source

Cibangu

: Replication Data for: HEALTHCARE PROVIDERS’ PERSPECTIVE ON BARRIERS TO OPTIMAL HIV INDEX TESTING. Harvard Dataverse, V1,2020. http://www.doi.org/10.7910/DVN/FHNY2V

Cibangu

: Replication Data for: HEALTHCARE PROVIDERS’ PERSPECTIVE ON BARRIERS TO OPTIMAL HIV INDEX TESTING. Harvard Dataverse, V1,2020. http://www.doi.org/10.7910/DVN/BUXS2X

Tong

Sainsbury

Craig

: Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Heatlh Care. 2007;19(6):349–57. 17872937

10.1093/intqhc/mzm042

Cibangu

: Replication Data for: Healthcare providers’ perspective on barriers to optimal HIV index testing: an interview-based study. Harvard Dataverse, V1,2020. http://www.doi.org/10.7910/DVN/CFZX0N

USAID, Burkina Faso Data use: Challenge: implementing index testing.2020. Reference Source

10.5256/f1000research.144018.r355826

Reviewer response for version 2

Kasaro

Margaret P.

1 2 Referee https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7285-998X Matenga

Tulani

2 Co-referee 1Division of Global Women's Health, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA 2UNC Global Projects Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia

Competing interests: No competing interests were disclosed.

20 1 2025

2025

This is an open access peer review report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

recommendation

approve-with-reservations

Thanks for your work on this important topic with regards to HIV control. Please look at my comments for consideration as you work on your paper.

(Are there other members of the study to be included on this work?)

On the abstract here are a few comments:

Background

Linkage of sentence 1 and 2 can be improved to emphasise the problem,

Please edit the aim sentence to cover the exploring of interventions to improve HTS

Results:

Provider related challenges:

Confirm if low numbers of volunteers trained in index testing was part of what participants reported

Expand to clarify the age and sex differences point

Is low elicitation same as inadequate knowledge?

Limited transport can be summarised as logistics

Client related challenges - Is sex work also considered seasonal? age and sex point could be edited to clarify, is space limitation a client challenge?

Is discussion = conclusions? Please consider edit of the conclusions to speak to the findings

Main body

Introduction:

Paragraph 1 - suggested edit for this sentence - By end of 2019 it was estimated that about 80% of PLHIV, and nearly 85% of PLHIV in southern and eastern Africa, knew their HIV status.

In this sentence - While this progress has been registered, poorly targeted HTS have continued to miss PLHIV who do not know their HIV status in many settings - is poorly targeted HTS to blame for the low testing?

Paragraph 2 - suggestion to rearrange the points identified as factors affecting HTS so that issues are addressed in sequence and the case is built for why we need this study

Paragraph 3 - link between line 1 and 2 can be strengthened

Methods:

Information in this section is repeated

Study population

Paragraph 2 is unclear. Please review.

Paragraph 3 may benefit from edit of how the PI is described and his role in selecting participants

Did the PI do all the data collection?

Characteristics of the interviewer - suggest to leave out or integrate in the earlier description of the PI

Results

Table 1 - It might be possible to identify the participants eg the 42 year old CLO at Matero

A summary of the emerging themes before detailed results will facilitate better reading and flow

Discussion

The discussion should be structured to first give the overarching findings of the study then address each finding in relation to what is in literature. This will flow easier and facility understanding of the paper.

It seems that results on possible interventions to increase HTS are presented in the discussion section, those should have been left in the results if this was part of the data collected. Otherwise these could have been crafted as recommendations as per what has been show to work

Limitations and strengths

Please state the strengths and limitations more clearly

Conclusions

Please ensure that the conclusions are made in sync with the findings

For the next section I worked with a PhD candidate on reviewing this paper and the following are his comments

This paper addresses a crucial and timely topic, and I found it engaging. Below are some specific suggestions to improve the paper;

Introduction

The statement "However, once men are tested, they may be more likely to disclose their HIV status" requires further explanation. What factors might contribute to this increased likelihood?

The current UNAIDS targets have been revised. Please update the reference accordingly.

Methods

Please specify how the interview guide was developed. Was it based on existing literature, adapted from previous studies, or developed specifically for this research?

Please clarify whether the interview guide was pilot tested and if any changes were made based on the feedback received.

The statement "Eighteen participants in the qualitative component of the study were selected on a convenience basis from the index testing services providers" suggests this study may be part of a larger research project. Please clarify this and provide relevant background information if applicable.

Study Settings

For readers unfamiliar with these facilities, provide more contextual information about Matero First Level Hospital, Matero Main Clinic, and George Health Centre in the Matero sub-district of Lusaka, Zambia.

Please explain the specific reasons for selecting these particular sites.

Study Population

Please clarify the inclusion and exclusion criteria for participants more explicitly, aligning them with the study's objectives.

Data Sources, Variables and Collection

Briefly outline the main themes or areas of inquiry covered by the open-ended interview questions.

The term "variable" is more commonly used in quantitative research. Consider removing it from this section.

Please indicate the average or typical duration of each interview.

Characteristics of the Interviewer

If the interviewer was a service provider who may have interacted with the interviewed healthcare providers, please acknowledge potential power dynamics and discuss how these might have influenced the study.

Data Management and Analysis

Describe the specific steps involved in the data analysis process.

If thematic analysis was used, please describe how themes, subthemes, etc., were identified and presented. Consider using a table to outline the identified themes for improved readability and clarity. Content analysis primarily focuses on the presence and frequency of certain concepts, themes, or patterns within the data.

Results

To improve the flow and readability of the results section, consider incorporating subheadings that reflect the key findings or themes.

While maintaining confidentiality, consider including limited identifying information for participants (e.g., "Participant 2, Medical Officer") to enhance the reader's understanding of the diversity of perspectives.

Instead of summarizing provider- and client-related challenges at the end of the section, present them as a dedicated sub-section with supporting quotes.

Discussion

Strengthen the discussion section by more thoroughly integrating the findings with existing literature.

Clarify "In Keeping with Evidence": Please rephrase the statement "These findings are in keeping with evidence from other studies" to provide more specific and meaningful context.

If key population/privacy/confidentiality concerns were not explicitly addressed in the results, ensure they are appropriately discussed in the discussion section.

If proposed solutions to identified challenges were not presented in the results section, integrate them into the discussion section with proper justification.

Ensure consistency between the results, discussion, and conclusion sections.

Ensure all findings mentioned in the discussion section are adequately supported by the data presented in the results

Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?

Yes

If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?

Partly

Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?

Yes

Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?

Yes

Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?

Partly

Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?

Yes

Reviewer Expertise:

Obstetrics and Gynaecology, public health with particular interest in HIV prevention in. women

We confirm that we have read this submission and believe that we have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard, however we have significant reservations, as outlined above.

10.5256/f1000research.144018.r163684

Reviewer response for version 2

Dziva Chikwari

Chido

1 2 Referee https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1617-3603 1Biomedical Research and Training Institute, Harare, Zimbabwe 2Clinical Research Department, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK

Competing interests: No competing interests were disclosed.

2 3 2023

2023

recommendation

approve

Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?

Yes

If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?

Yes

Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?

Yes

Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?

Yes

Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?

Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?

Yes

Reviewer Expertise:

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard.

10.5256/f1000research.29120.r75516

Reviewer response for version 1

Dziva Chikwari

Chido

Competing interests: No competing interests were disclosed.

16 12 2020

2020

recommendation

approve-with-reservations

This is a useful paper that reflects some of the barriers and facilitators of index linked HIV testing which is a strategy that has potential to increase the yield of undiagnosed HIV. There are however, some comments for the Author below.

Abstract

Discussion section includes new findings not mentioned in the results such as variation by gender and age. May be best to move to the results section.

The conclusions mentioned in the abstract are not in line with the results presented in the abstract. There is a need for the two to be aligned. See comment above. Additionally, stigma and discrimination not mentioned as a barrier in the results.

Manuscript

Introduction

Please including timing of the study in Zambia - year.

There is no comparator for increasing yield of index partner testing that is reported in the introduction “Many studies have shown that index partner testing has the potential to increase HTS uptake, and identify and diagnose HIV infected partners (yield ranging from 35% to 62% without reported intimate partner violence)”. Is the increase in yield from 35%-65%?

Reference the UNAIDS 90-90-90 goals?

May be useful to define index testing as this term is not very common.

Methods

In the data management and analysis section the author notes that any disagreements were resolved through discussion; who was this discussion with? The interviewees? Another study staff member?

Results

Would it be possible to summarise the demographic data provided in Table 1? Given the low number of participants from only two facilities, presenting the data in such a format could make it easy for the participants identity to be decoded.

Were all the providers who were interviewed “index testing workers”? Are index testing workers different from Index testing providers? It may be beneficial to describe the different roles of the health workers.

Discussion

It appears the discussion is providing results in the first two paragraphs when instead it should be providing a summary. The split between provider and client related challenges should be introduced in the results rather than the discussion where findings should be summarised.

First two paragraphs of the discussion are listing findings. These should be discussed rather than listed. The presentation here reads more like a results section.

Your results do not present anything about key populations; however, you mention these in the discussion as part of your findings?

These barriers are listed in the discussion but not presented in the results. “Barriers to partner notification services also included concerns around privacy/confidentiality and intimate partner violence. Lack of awareness of risk for HIV infection/ misconceptions; structural, psychological, financial, were barriers to being tested.”

The gender and age variations that are discussed in the conclusion are not presented on the results?

Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?

Yes

If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?

Yes

Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?

Yes

Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?

Yes

Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?

Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?

Yes

Reviewer Expertise:

Epidemiology: HIV and Sexual and Reproductive Health.

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard, however I have significant reservations, as outlined above.