Comparison of WHO growth standard and national Indonesian growth reference in determining prevalence and determinants of stunting and underweight in children under five: a cross-sectional study from Musi sub-district

Background: Determination of stunting and wasting always uses the WHO growth standard in Indonesia. However, it is believed that Indonesian children are “below” the global standard, thus the WHO standard is not reliable to present the actual prevalence. This study aims to compare the prevalence and determinants of stunting and underweight using WHO growth standard and national Indonesian growth reference. Methods: This was a cross-sectional study carried out in Musi sub-district, East Nusa Tenggara province in July 2019. East Nusa Tenggara province had the highest prevalence of stunting and underweight in Indonesia. The study population were children under five, and total sampling method was used for this study. Length/height-for-age and weight-for-age were plotted using WHO standard and national Indonesian reference. Univariate and multivariate binomial logistic regression were used for statistical analysis. Results: The prevalence of stunting and underweight were higher for the WHO standard than the national reference (53.9% vs 10.7% and 29.17% vs 17.7%; all p < 0.001). After adjusted for confounding factors, when the WHO standard was used, determinants of stunting were maternal mid-upper arm circumference below 23.5cm and maternal height below 150cm; determinants of underweight were intrauterine growth restriction, young maternal age during pregnancy, and multiple parities. When the national reference was used, no determinants was found for stunting; the determinants of underweight were intrauterine growth restriction and maternal education. Conclusions: The WHO standard is not suitable for representing child growth in Musi sub-district. Future studies should be done to re-evaluate the prevalence and determinants of stunting and underweight nationwide using the national Indonesian reference.


Introduction
According to the data from 2011, the global incidence of stunting, underweight, and wasting were approximately 164.8 million (25.7%), 100.7 million (15.7%), and 51.5 million (8%) among children under five, respectively.Meanwhile, the global deaths attributed to stunting, underweight, and wasting were approximately 1.017 million (14.7%), 999,000 (14.4%), and 875,000 (12.6%) 1 .Until 2018, stunting and wasting rates remained alarming, although the prevalence was declining.Among continents, Asia has the highest prevalence of stunting (55%) and wasting (68%).Based on country income classification, 65% of all stunted and 73% of all wasted children live in lower-and middle-income countries 2 .However, in the 2018 report, there is no updated data regarding the prevalence of underweight.
The latest basic health survey in Indonesia in 2018 showed that the prevalence of stunting, underweight, and wasting was 30.8%, 17.7%, and 10.2%, respectively.Among other provinces in Indonesia, East Nusa Tenggara province has the highest prevalence of stunting and underweight, at 42.6% and 29.5%, respectively.Meanwhile, the prevalence of wasting was lower, ranked 8 th out of 35 provinces 3 .According to child growth severity classification, the severity of stunting is high and underweight is medium in Indonesia.In East Nusa Tenggara province, the severity of stunting is very high, and the severity of underweight is high 4 .
However, determination of stunting and wasting always uses the WHO growth standard in Indonesia.It is believed that Indonesian children are "below" the global standard in general, thus the WHO standard is not reliable to present the actual prevalence.Therefore, the national Indonesian growth reference was made using data from National Basic Health Survey 5 .To this date, no study has been done to scrutinize the difference between WHO growth standard and national Indonesian growth references.This study aims to compare the prevalence and determinants of stunting and underweight using WHO growth standard and Indonesian growth reference.We use the data from one of the sub-districts in East Nusa Tenggara province because this province had the highest prevalence of stunting and underweight among children under five in Indonesia.

Ethical statement
This study followed the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Department of Health Timor Tengah Utara district (approval number: DINKES.440/995/XI/2019).This study also complies with STROBE guidelines 6,7 .All parents gave their written informed consent prior to their children's inclusion in the study.Information for informed consent was given before the informed consent form was signed.Details that might disclose the identity of the study subjects were omitted from the published data file.

Study design and population
This study was an observational cross-sectional study conducted in Musi sub-district, one of the sub-districts in East Nusa Tenggara province.Participant recruitment and data collection were conducted in July 2019.Data analysis was conducted in October -December 2019.There were six villages in Musi sub-district.The study population were children aged less than five years old.Total sampling was used for this study.The children and their parents were approached face-to-face by JF during the monthly growth monitoring program in Posyandu ("Pos Pelayanan Terpadu"), a healthcare program by the Indonesian government.Inclusion criteria were children under five who attended the growth monitoring program during the study period, who were born and live with their parents in Musi sub-district, and had maternal and child health books (Buku Kesehatan Ibu dan Anak / KIA) published by the Ministry of Health Republic Indonesia.Children with incomplete KIA was excluded from the determinants analysis.

Data collection
Both primary and secondary data was used in this study.Primary data for this study consisted of data obtained through interviews with parents, child anthropometry measurements, and maternal height measurements.The interviews took place in the same location as the Posyandu and were conducted by JF using a predetermined questionnaire.The length of the interview was around five minutes.JF is a female general practitioner who worked in primary healthcare in the sub-district where the study took place.She had worked there for seven months when the study was conducted.Interviews with parents was carried out to obtain information regarding village of origin, parents' highest education, number of parities, delivery method, and sex and age of their children.Anthropometry measurements of maternal height and child length/height were done by healthcare workers from Oeolo Primary Healthcare.Secondary data from KIA was used to obtain data regarding birthweight, gestational age, maternal mid-upper arm circumference, and maternal age during pregnancy.

Categorization of variables
Underweight and stunting were categorized using WHO growth standard and national Indonesian growth reference for the same sex 5,8 .Underweight is defined as weight for age below -2 standard deviations (SD), and severe underweight is defined as weight for age below -3 SD.Stunting is defined as length/height for age below -2 SD, and severe stunting is defined as length/height for age below -3 SD.The cut-off level for maternal mid-upper arm circumference was 23.5 cm, for maternal height was 150 cm, and for children's birthweight was 2500 g.The cut-off level for maternal mid-upper arm circumference was according to the Indonesian national cut-off 9 , while for maternal height and children's birthweight, the cut-off was based on a previous study 10 .Maternal age during pregnancy was categorized

Amendments from Version 3
In this version, we have corrected the adjusted odds ratio value of mid-upper arm circumference as a determinant for stunting (old version AOR value = 1.796, new version AOR value = 1.769).We also have corrected the variables name, AOR, 95%CI, and p-value in Table 4.
Any further responses from the reviewers can be found at the end of the article to <20 years old, 20-35 years old, and >35 years old.Gestational age and intrauterine growth were categorized based on Lubchenco charts.It categorizes the gestational age to preterm (<37 weeks), term (37-42 weeks), or postterm (>42 weeks) and the intrauterine growth to small for gestational age (SGA) (<10 th percentile), appropriate for gestational age (AGA) (10 th -90 th percentile), or large for gestational age (LGA) (>90 th percentile) 11 .

Statistical analysis
Acquired data was analysed using SPSS Statistic for Windows, version 25.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, N.Y., USA).Data analysis was conducted in two phases.In the first phase, univariate logistic regression was used to identify independent variables that were associated with stunting or underweight.Variables with p < 0.1 were included in the next phase.In second phase, multivariate logistic regression using backward selection was used.Variables with p <0.05 from multivariate analysis were considered as the determinants.

Results
There was a total of 408 children under five in Musi subdistrict.Based on WHO standard, the prevalence of stunting and underweight were 53.9% and 29.17%, respectively 12,13 .Using national reference, the prevalence of stunting and underweight were 10.7% and 17.7%, respectively.There was a significant difference of stunting and underweight between the prevalence from the WHO standard and national reference (both p <0.001).However, there were only 218 children that fulfilled the criteria to be included for the determinants analysis (Table 1) (Figure 1).

Sociodemographic characteristics
The prevalence of stunting and underweight among this study population were 51.4% and 31.7% according to WHO standard and 8.3% and 19.3% according to national reference (Table 1).The number of male and female children were almost equal.More than half of the children were aged between 24 and 59 months old.Majority of the children were born term with a birthweight of more than 2500 g.The education level of both parents was mainly elementary school graduates.Almost half of the mothers had a height of less than 150 cm and more than half of the mothers had a mid-arm circumference of ≤23.5 cm during pregnancy (Table 2).

Determinants of stunting according to WHO standard and national reference
Based on WHO standard, univariate logistic regression analysis indicated that children with maternal height below 150 cm (COR = 2.844; 95% CI = 1.632 -4.956) were more likely to be stunted (Table 3).In the multivariate logistic regression analysis,      other variables with p-value between 0.05 and 0.1 from the univariate analysis (child's birthweight, child's intrauterine growth status, maternal mid-upper arm circumference, and number of parities) were included.Multivariate analysis indicated that children with maternal height below 150 cm (AOR = 2.936; 95% CI = 1.672 -5.154) or maternal midupper arm circumference below 23.5 cm (AOR = 1.769; 95% CI = 1.008 -3.105) were more likely to be stunted (Table 4).
In multivariate logistic regression analysis, other variables with p-value between 0.05 and 0.1 from the univariate analysis (child's intrauterine growth status and maternal height) were included.No determinant was found in the multivariate analysis (Table 4).

Determinants of underweight according to WHO standard and national reference
Based on WHO standard, univariate logistic regression analysis indicated that children with a birthweight below 2500 g (COR = 3.159; 95% CI = 1.507 -6.622) or intrauterine growth restriction (COR = 3.715; 95% CI = 1.798 -7.677) were more likely to be underweight.Children with maternal height below 150 cm (COR = 2.098; 95% CI = 1.176 -3.745) or maternal age under 20 years old during pregnancy (COR = 5.312; 95% CI = 1.989 -14.186) were also more likely to be underweight (Table 5).In multivariate logistic regression analysis, other variables with p-value between 0.05 and 0.1 from the univariate analysis (paternal education and number of parities) were included.Multivariate analysis indicated that children with intrauterine growth restriction (AOR = 3.182; 95% CI = 1.450 -6.980) were more likely to be underweight.Children with maternal age under 20 years old during pregnancy (AOR = 6.252; 95% CI = 1.911 -20.457) or with mother that had more than four parities (AOR = 4.319; 95% CI = 1.189 -15.689) were also more likely to be underweight (Table 6).
In multivariate logistic regression analysis, other variables with p-value between 0.05 and 0.1 from the univariate analysis (paternal education and number of parities) were included.Multivariate analysis indicated that children with intrauterine growth restriction (AOR = 4.191; 95% CI = 1.820 -9.649) were more likely to be underweight.Children with mother without formal education (AOR = 27.341;95% CI =1.281 -583,318) were also more likely to be underweight (Table 6).

Discussion
In our study, the prevalence of both stunting and underweight were significantly lower when measured using national Indonesian reference compared to when using WHO standard.It has been suggested that overdiagnoses of stunting or underweight are more likely to occur in developing countries 14 .There are many countries that already proposed their own national growth reference, which are: Korea 15 , Thailand 16 , Argentina 17 , China 18 , India 14 , and 18 European countries 19 .It is argued that the national growth reference of each country is more suitable to reflect the condition in its own population 16 .However, there were only few published studies that compare the difference between national growth reference and WHO growth standard.A comparison study among Thai children in the first two years of life showed that the prevalence of stunting was higher when using WHO standard in both sexes, but at 24 months the only significant difference was in girls.The prevalence of underweight showed a monotonic increment when using WHO standard, but the Thailand national reference showed a fluctuation 16 .In Argentina, the prevalence of underweight using WHO standard was 2 times higher than when using their national reference.Meanwhile for stunting, the prevalence when using WHO standard was 1.5 times higher 17 .In contrary, a comparison study from China showed that the prevalence of stunting and underweight was significantly higher when measured using their national reference 18 .
The marked difference in measurements using national Indonesian reference and WHO standard probably stems from the difference in methodology during the development of both growth references.The WHO standard was developed using data from six study sites: Brazil, Ghana, India, Norway, Oman, and the USA.The children included in the study were healthy children with suitable sociodemographic conditions for growth.Moreover, all participants agreed to follow the feeding recommendation by WHO 20 .In contrary, the development of national Indonesian reference did not have any inclusion and exclusion criteria for study participants.It also did not mention the sociodemographic background of the participants or their feeding habits.The study, however, collected data from all 33 provinces of Indonesia to better reflect the growth of Indonesian children.The rationale to develop national Indonesian growth reference was because there is a size difference between Indonesian and US Americans 5 .
Review article by Beal et al. concluded that the determinants of stunting in Indonesia are maternal height and education, child's sex, premature birth and birth length, exclusive breastfeeding for six months, living area, and household socio-economic status 21 .In our study, the determinants of stunting according to WHO standard were maternal height less than 150 cm and maternal upper mid-arm circumference <23.5 cm.In contrast, no determinant was found when Indonesian reference was used.It is because the prevalence of stunting according to Indonesian reference was low.The significant difference in stunting prevalence calculated using national Indonesian reference and WHO standard might be because the WHO standard does not represent local growth appropriately due to population differences in height 19 , and Indonesian people are generally shorter than the rest of the world.
Regarding underweight, the determinants were also different according to the two different references.However, there was one common determinant: intrauterine growth restriction.The difference of underweight prevalence between WHO standard and national Indonesian reference was not as marked as the difference in stunting prevalence; this may explain that there was still one overlapping determinant.The increased odds of stunting, underweight, and wasting in SGA infants are more relevant in low-and middle-income countries 22 .It is suggested that SGA children are born with lower intrinsic potential for growth due to the persistent effect of growth restriction in utero 23,24 .
There were several limitations of this study.Data regarding socioeconomic status could not be obtained due to parents' unstable monthly income.Data on exclusive breastfeeding cannot be obtained because some of our samples have not yet completed the exclusive breastfeeding period.Data regarding the frequency of diarrhea could not be obtained because this was not well documented in primary healthcare medical records.
The sample size of this study was small, particularly the number of stunting children using national Indonesian growth reference was only 18 children.Therefore, it was not adequate to analyze the determinants.These above-mentioned factors should be accounted for in the ensuing studies.Nevertheless, despite all of the limitations, this is the first study that compare the prevalence and determinants of stunting and underweight among Indonesian children under five using WHO growth standard and national Indonesian growth reference.

Conclusion
The WHO standard is not suitable for representing child growth in Musi sub-district.Future studies should be done to re-evaluate the prevalence and determinants of stunting and underweight nationwide using the national Indonesian reference.An national Indonesian reference for weight-for-height should also be made to re-evaluate the prevalence and determinants of wasting in Indonesia.1.
The statistic was used for data explanation should be more clear such as OR mean Cluded OR, COR, by bivariate whereas Adjusted OR, AOR, used for multivariate analysis.
The conclusion should consider one more limitation is that the small sample size of the data particularly on child stunning number on national WHO standard in comparing.As a result, the next research should be more explored.

Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature? Yes
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?Yes

If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate? Yes
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?Yes

Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results? Partly
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.

Reviewer Expertise: Maternal and Child Health
I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard, however I have significant reservations, as outlined above.
children of the Musi sub-district as they describe how these children grow.They do not describe how these children might grow under different conditions.
The authors use the terms "stunting", "wasting", and "underweight".These terms refer to body size, they do not describe the nutritional situation.Underweight is defined as: weight for age < -2 standard deviations (SD) of the WHO Child Growth Standards median.Stunting is defined as height for age < -2 SD of the WHO Child Growth Standards median.Wasting is defined as weight for height < -2 SD of the WHO Child Growth Standards median 1 ).The three terms relate to an internationally used "standard", suggesting that this standard is also applicable to the Indonesian population.But this has been questioned.Healthy Indonesians are shorter and lighter than healthy white US citizens (who grow similar to what the WHO considers their growth standard).The difference in size between Indonesian and US Americans was the rational to develop national Indonesian growth references (Pulungan et al.  2018).
In addition, the authors use the term "undernutrition".Undernutrition refers to food: Undernutrition can be defined as "lack of proper nutrition, caused by not having enough food or not eating enough food containing substances necessary for growth and health" ( https://www.lexico.com/en/definition/undernutrition).Chronic undernutrition has an impact on body size as it results in poor growth, but being short (stunting) is not a synonym of mal-or undernutrition (Scheffler C et al.Stunting is not a synonym of malnutrition.Eur J Clin Nutr.2019 May 29 2 ).Short people may be short for other than nutritional reasons.
It is not clear whether the authors wanted to study size (length and weight), or the nutritional situation of the children of Musi.They start the manuscript with the words: "Undernutrition among children under five …".Later it is written: "There are three indicators to measure nutritional imbalance that lead to undernutrition …" suggesting that the manuscript is on nutrition.But where is the data on food?The authors need to provide information on food, or at least on energy deposits in terms of skinfold thickness, arm circumferences etc., or in the case of mal-or undernutrition, show clinical signs of protein or calorie malnutrition, or signs of micronutrient deficiencies.This is not the case.
It is known to the reviewer that there is international confusion about the terms stunting and malnutrition.Calculating the portion of stunted children refers to the question of how many children are below height for age < -2 SD of the WHO Child Growth Standards median.This does not necessarily mean that this portion of children is also undernourished.
The manuscript needs major rethinking and re-evaluating of the measurements of height and weight.It is necessary to describe growth of the children of Musi, and to publish these data.The children of Musi are shorter and lighter than suggested by the WHO standard.But this does NOT mean that these children suffer from food shortage.It rather appears that the WHO standard is not applicable for these children, and thus does NOT indicate malnutrition of this child population.This needs to be stressed.The authors should carefully read some of the recent papers discussing the misinterpretation of stunting as a sign of undernutrition (Hermanussen et al.The impact of social identity and social dominance on the regulation of human growth.A viewpoint.Acta Paediatr.2019 Aug 16 3 ).
The tables show odds ratios.It is much more informative when data are presented as true values.
The reader is not so much interested in what proportion of children ranges above or below a certain cut-off, but what are the mean values of height, weight, etc. in this child population.
Minor comments: Correct the term "national standard".What you mean is: "national reference".Correct the term "gender".What you mean is probably "sex".Table 4 needs to be shortened, there is no need to show empty boxes.The same applies for table 6 Discussion: The authors write: "SGA is a result of poor maternal nutrition during pregnancy".This is not quite true.Ample evidence obtained from European countries during periods of war and post-war starvation illustrates that even when pregnant women are severely undernourished, the newborn infants only suffer from minor decreases in body weight (Keys A, Brozek J, Henschel A, Mickelsen O, Longstreet Taylor H.The biology of human starvation.The University of Minnesota Press.Minneapolis.1950.).
See various comments in the text.
The benefits of publishing with F1000Research: Your article is published within days, with no editorial bias • You can publish traditional articles, null/negative results, case reports, data notes and more • The peer review process is transparent and collaborative • Your article is indexed in PubMed after passing peer review • Dedicated customer support at every stage • For pre-submission enquiries, contact research@f1000.com

#p-
value between underweight (and severely underweight) and normal.p <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Figure 1 .
Figure 1.Flow chart of the study population selection for determinants analysis.
Full Text | Free Full Text 24.Sania A, Spiegelman D, Rich-Edwards J, et al.: The contribution of preterm birth and intrauterine growth restriction to childhood undernutrition in Tanzania.Matern Child Nutr.2015; 11(4): 618-30.PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text Michael Hermanussen University of Kiel, Kiel, Germany There are just two minor comments: It is not clear according to what criteria the authors rejected 190 children reducing the total number analyzed from formerly 408 to 218 children.The authors may add this information.

Table 2 . Sociodemographic characteristics among children aged 0-59 months in Musi Sub-district.
SGA, small for gestational age; AGA, appropriate for gestational age; LGA, large for gestational age; MUAC, mid-upper arm circumference.

Table 3 . Univariate analysis of determinants for stunting among children aged 0-59 months in Musi Sub-district.
SGA, small for gestational age; AGA, appropriate for gestational age; LGA, large for gestational age; MUAC, mid-upper arm circumference; COR, crude odds ratio.

Table 4 . Multivariate analysis of determinants for stunting among children aged 0-59 months in Musi Sub-district.
AOR, adjusted odds ratio; MUAC, mid-upper arm circumference.

Table 5 . Univariate analysis of determinants for underweight among children aged 0-59 months in Musi Sub-district.
SGA, small for gestational age; AGA, appropriate for gestational age; LGA, large for gestational age; MUAC, mid-upper arm circumference; COR, crude odds ratio.

Table 6 . Multivariate analysis of determinants for underweight among children aged 0-59 months in Musi Sub-district.
, small for gestational age; AGA, appropriate for gestational age; LGA, large for gestational age; AOR, adjusted odds ratio. SGA