Rajan M and Chacko T. Improving educational environment in medical colleges through transactional analysis practice of teachers [version 1; peer review: 2 approved]. F1000Research 2012, 1:24 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.1-24.v1)
NOTE: If applicable, it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
1Malankara Orthodox Syrian Church Medical College, Kolenchery, Kerala Pin, 682311, India 2Faimer Regional Institute, PSG Medical College, Coimbatore, 641004, India
OPEN PEER REVIEW
REVIEWER STATUS
Abstract
Context: A FAIMER (Foundation for Advancement in International Medical Education and Research) fellow organized a comprehensive faculty development program to improve faculty awareness resulting in changed teaching practices and better teacher student relationships using Transactional Analysis (TA). Practicing TA tools help development of ‘awareness’ about intrapersonal and interpersonal processes. Objectives:
To improve self-awareness among medical educators.
To bring about self-directed change in practices among medical educators.
To assess usefulness of TA tools for the same.
Methods: An experienced trainer conducted a basic course (12 hours) in TA for faculty members. The PAC model of personality structure, functional fluency model of personal functioning, stroke theory on motivation, passivity and script theories of adult functional styles were taught experientially with examples from the Medical Education Scenario. Self-reported improvement in awareness and changes in practices were assessed immediately after, at three months, and one year after training. Findings: The mean improvement in self-'awareness' is 13.3% (95% C.I 9.3-17.2) among nineteen participants. This persists one year after training. Changes in practices within a year include, collecting feedback, new teaching styles and better relationship with students. Discussion and Conclusions: These findings demonstrate sustainable and measurable improvement in self-awareness by practice of TA tools. Improvement in self-'awareness' of faculty resulted in self-directed changes in teaching practices. Medical faculty has judged the TA tools effective for improving self-awareness leading to self-directed changes.
Corresponding author:
Marina Rajan
Competing interests:
The author is a practicing and training Transactional Analyst and believes it is a useful technique for personal development. She has conducted the training. This may or may not have a bearing on the outcomes of the training and interpretations.
Grant information:
The author(s) declared that no grants were involved in supporting this work.
There is an increasing awareness about the importance of educational environment in bringing about effective learning. "The learning environment created in the training group is crucial in helping trainees take risks while feeling supported"1. Student’s perception of learning, their teachers, the learning atmosphere, and their academic and social self-perceptions are major components of the DREEM (Dundee Ready Education Environment) questionnaire developed for studying the environment of medical education2. Many medical colleges in India are now taking initiatives to find out remedial measures to be taken to improve the learning environment3.
Developing trusting relationships is one of the components of a model for self-directed learning1. The need for a comprehensive faculty development initiative in institutions is emphasized among the various strategies that are directed to improve teaching practices in medical schools. Faculty development projects are hence included for Curriculum Innovation Projects in FAIMER Fellowship programs. A "Comprehensive faculty development, which is more important today than ever before, empowers faculty members to excel as educators and to create vibrant academic communities that value teaching and learning"4.
Comprehensive faculty development could be done by using the Transactional Analysis (TA) theory of personality development (see What is TA). It can be the basis for bringing about faculty development by facilitating their understanding of their own teaching styles by practice of the TA tools. Transactional Analysis belongs to the humanistic school of psychology1. The International Transactional Analysis Association explains "Educational transactional analysis is used by practitioners working in training centers, preschools, elementary and high schools, universities, and institutions that prepare teachers and trainers as well as in support of learners of all ages to thrive within their families, organizations, and communities." (see About TA Transactional Analysis), TA describes a theory of the structure of personality – Ego state (P-A-C-) model (see Key Ideas in TA) and how people communicate with each other based on this structure. Since education is an area of intensive interpersonal processes, practicing self-awareness using this model is known to help develop self-awareness (herein after referred to as ‘awareness’)5. The dynamics of how self-awareness leads to self-directed improvement in teaching is illustrated in figure 1.
Figure 1. Dynamics of self-awareness and self-directed behavior change.
A survey conducted among students in our institution to find out their perceptions about the existing system of medical education and suggestions for improvement revealed many lacunae in the teacher-student relationships that form a barrier to learning and thus contribute to a poor learning environment (Marina Rajan Joseph, Student Perceptions about Learning Environment in a New Medical College in Kerala, Unpublished document). In this context, it was felt that an educational intervention study among the faculty to initiate interest among them about the need for an improvement in the learning environment within the institution is necessary. The author chose this as a Curriculum Innovation Project for her FAIMER fellowship.
Objectives
1. To increase personal ‘awareness’ about the interpersonal processes that takes place during teaching-learning among medical educators.
2. To bring about a self-directed changes in the behavior of the teachers that makes them more student-centered and thereby contributing to a healthy educational environment.
3. To assess the usefulness of the TA tools for the above purposes.
It was assumed that an improved self-awareness about the teaching learning processes and teacher student interactions among teachers would bring about a better understanding of lacunae in teacher student relationships and motivate teachers for self-directed corrective measures thereby resulting in an improved learning environment for the students.
Methods
Ethical clearance
The project was presented to the institutional ethics committee and ratification obtained. Verbal informed consent was obtained from the participants.
Study design
An interventional study without a control group has been used. The author, a trained Transactional Analysis (Edu) trainer with five years of experience in training, conducted a course in TA with focus on intrapersonal and interpersonal processes, for medical faculty members in our college.
Sample size
Since it was an explorative study all faculty members who volunteered were included in the study.
Program content
The content of the program was designed based on the framework of 101 (Basic) courses in Transactional Analysis7. This included the Okay-Okay philosophy of TA, Structure of personality (the ego states or Parent – Adult – Child model), the Functional Fluency model, a new model in TA developed from the ego state model specifically for educators and trainers8, stroke theory on motivation- a theory which states that ‘Stroking’ or ‘stimulation’ is essential for health and that wherever positive stroking is lacking, there persons may seek negative strokes to affirm their existence-5, passivity theory which teaches about passive behavior which are said to be the barriers to effective problem solving and script theory which teaches about how early childhood decisions affect our style of function as adults.
Session delivery
Two colleagues trained in TA helped the author with the sessions, data collection and also provided structured and concurrent feedback to the trainer. Their feedbacks on the trainer and participants helped in maintaining objectivity during the training program. The program extended over 12 hours (2 days). The course was conducted ‘contractually’ (negotiating between the expectations of participants and what the trainer got to offer) and using ‘open honest transactions’ (objectively stating what is expected, and appropriate, descriptive rather than prescriptive feed backs) the two principles of TA practice.
The program was experiential with exercises and practice sessions for developing personal ‘awareness’ through practice of the Ego state tool9, stroking practice and role plays on types of interpersonal transactions. There were many one to one, small groups and large group discussions with opportunity for reflections. All theoretical aspects were illustrated using examples and case studies from everyday processes in Medical education. There participants introspected, shared insights and planned for future action based on insights developed.
Students’ perceptions
Student’s perceptions about the present system of teaching and suggestions for improvement (students wanted teachers to be friendlier and teach more interactively and from practical experience) were also communicated to the teachers.
Evaluation
Self-assessment of the participant’s ‘awareness’ before training, immediately after, at three months and one year after the training program were collected using an adapted version of a retro pre-behavior assessment tool available free on the Business Balls website. This included awareness’ in eighteen different areas of interpersonal relations.
Analysis
The improvement in awareness was assessed quantitatively using Epi Info. Mean improvement in awareness of the group at three different times after training and mean improvement in awareness about specific areas of behavior were calculated and compared. Program feedback and evaluation on the usefulness of the tool was also collected using a post test questionnaire. Consensus on the usefulness of the TA theory and its tools for improving self-awareness was calculated using the Consensus index10. Self-reported changes in practices have also been quantified.
Qualitative analyses of the group discussions and recommendations from action plans have also been included in the discussion.
Results
Nineteen faculty members of different age and experience participated in the training (Table 1). After 3 months only 12 members and after 1 year only 11 members were available for follow up. Table 2 to Table 5 show the findings in mean improvement in awareness, areas in interpersonal processes where improvement has occurred, consensus on the usefulness of the TA tools and self-directed changes in practices resulting from awareness.
Table 1. Showing the demographic profile of the participants.
Educational qualifications
Gender distribution
Departments/Subjects taught
Age pattern
Teaching experience
MBBS – MD/MS – Dip NB
6 12 1
Male – Female –
10 9
Physiology – Forensic – Com. Medicine – Internal Medicine – Surgery – Orthopedics – Obs. Gyne – Pediatrics – Dermatology –
2 3 3 2 1 3 2 2 1
<30 Years 31–40 years 41–50 years – 51–60 year – >60 years –
3 7 3 4 2
<1 year – 2–5 years 6–10 year >15 years
4 6 7 2
Total –
19
19
19
19
19
Table 2. Showing the self-perception of improvement in mean awareness by participants at different times after training.
Time of assessment
% score before exposure to TA training
% score after exposure to TA training
Difference in score between before and after
95% confidence limits*
P value
Immediately after training n-(19)
54.91
68.27
13.36
9.3 – 17.2
> 0.001 for 18 d.f.
3 months later n-12
53.28
65.55
12.26
8.94 – 15.58
> 0.001 for 11 d.f.
1 year later n-11
46.31
60.4
14.09
9.87 – 18.31
> 0.001 for 10 d.f.
* As can be seen from the 95% confidence limits of each value there is no statistically significant difference between the mean improvements recorded immediately after training, three months later or one year later.
Table 3. Showing the areas of Personal Awareness showing greatest improvement in at different stages of assessment. (Q. no. of the assessment sheet).
Areas of awareness
% improvement in score immediately after training
% improvement persisting three months after training
% improvement persisting 1 year after training
(Q.no.1) Being aware of my own behavior with others
16.85%
15.8%
22.72%
Q.no.3 Being aware of reactions of others to my behavior
15.26%
19.1%
21.8%
Q.no.4 ‘Being aware of my reaction to the behavior of others’
21.6%,
15%
13.6%
Q.no.14 ‘Being aware of what behavior modification I need to do’
19.5%,
16.7%
16.36%
Q.no.15 ‘Knowing how to modify my behavior’
19.5%.
14.1%
14.54%
Q. no.18 The general level of my interpersonal skills with others
16.3%
12.5%
20%
Table 4. Showing consensus of participants on the usefulness of different TA tools.
Types of tools
Consensus %
PAC Model for practicing self-awareness
88.7%
Functional fluency model for flexibility in functioning
84.8%
Usefulness of TA tools for better Teacher student relationships
81.2%
Usefulness of the TA tools for medical teacher’s training
62.4%* *73.73% one year after training
Table 5. Showing the changes in practices of faculty one year after training.
Changes in practices
No of persons n-11
%
Conscious change in responses while communicating
11
100
Changes in teaching styles
9
81.8
Collecting feedback from students
6
54.5
Improved relationship with students
8
72.7
Collecting feedback from peers
0
0
Discussion
The mean improvement in self-awareness immediately after training persists at three months and one year after training (Table 2). It reflects the lasting quality of the awareness generated which is behavioral, a Kirkpatrick level three benefit (see Kirkpatrick Philosophy). Though other researchers5 have reported improvement in self-awareness after learning TA, there are not many reports on measuring and grading this awareness. In this study the greatest improvement in awareness was reported in three areas namely ‘being aware of my reaction to the behavior of others’, ‘being aware of what behavior modification I need to do’, and ‘knowing how to modify my behavior’ (Table 3). This is a very positive outcome of the training because in improving teacher student relationships, it is these three awareness competencies that help the teacher modulate behavior in the here and now of the teacher student interaction. It is also interesting that as time elapse after training, practice of awareness over a year has consistently improved the faculty’s self-perception about their ‘general interpersonal skills’. Research among student teachers has demonstrated that becoming aware of their own attitudes, beliefs and cognition helped them to achieve specific aims in professional practice5. It has been demonstrated among Russian university students that use of Transactional Analysis by them helped them to gain a high level of knowledge about effective relationships and ability to use this knowledge in their professional and personal lives11. The group’s consensus on usefulness of TA for medical teacher’s training has increased one year after training (Table 4). It probably reflects their personal experience of practicing the tools and perceived benefits thereof. The high degree of consensus among participants who are all doctors, on the usefulness of TA tools for Medical Teachers training, and on the usefulness of the PAC and ‘Functional Fluency’ models prompts future studies on these tools.
During discussions the participants connected needs expressed by the students to the stroke theory on motivation. TA research work with College students has shown that greatest growth was reported in the area of stroking12. They identified lack of positive stroking in the medical education scenario as a probable reason for the lack of motivation they observed among many students, particularly considering the fact that in India students come to the medical college straight from schools. Positive stroking and Open Honest Transactions were identified by the participants as the most practical TA tools for improving teacher student relationships.
Education and psychology has a shared history and "It has been the humanistic psychologists who have grappled mostly with the problems of learning"1. She quotes Malcom Knowles who formulated the theory of adult learning and ‘andragogy’, as saying that "Some of the most important contributions to learning theory have come from psychotherapy". Carl Rogers famous for his innovative ‘Client-centered therapy’ applied the same to education and said that education is "facilitation of learning" and educator is "facilitator of learning" thus bringing in a ‘student centered’ approach to education.13. The transition from use of the term ‘Pedagogy’ to ‘Andragogy’ also reflects a transition from teacher-centered education to student-centered education14. The four desirable factors in teachers namely, ‘warmth, enthusiasm, use of discovery-learning methods, and high level of cognitive organization’15 are also qualities of educators who are student centered. Many faculty members in this study have adopted changes in similar practices within one year of attending the Transactional Analysis training (Table 5). It shows that comprehensive faculty development such as using the TA approach fosters development of many of the qualities of student centered among medical educators.
The participants developed an action plan at the end of the training. They requested more organized and formal training in pedagogical methods along with more inputs on interpersonal skills. They volunteered to organize an effectively functioning Medical Education unit that not only sharpens pedagogical skills but also leads to a better understanding of students, their learning processes and create a favorable educational environment in the institution.
Conclusion
These results suggest that practice of the ego state awareness using the PAC model helps to improve self-awareness and sustains it even up to a year after training. This awareness in turn is helping teachers to become aware of their own and student’s behavior in different situations and makes appropriate modifications. This in turn helps them to practice new teaching styles and improve teacher student relationships. Participants reported increasing confidence in the TA tools for medical teacher’s training. It suggests that continued and consistent inputs using the same may remarkably improve personal ‘awareness’ among teachers and thus the teacher-student relationship, leading to an improvement in the educational environment vital for promoting student learning.
Author contributions
Marina Rajan Joseph conceived this project, carried it out and wrote it up. Thomas V. Chacko MD refined and reviewed the article.
Competing interests
The author is a practicing and training Transactional Analyst and believes it is a useful technique for personal development. She has conducted the training. This may or may not have a bearing on the outcomes of the training and interpretations.
Grant information
The author(s) declared that no grants were involved in supporting this work.
Acknowledgement
The authors wish to acknowledge the support in design and conduct by the FAIMER community and financial support of the institutional administration for carrying out the project. We also acknowledge the physical and intellectual assistance rendered by TA practitioners Smt. Mary Koshy Computer Engineer and Smt Anjaly Vijayan Social work tutor in the conduct of the project, data collection and analysis. We are thankful to Drs. Amol Dongre and Ravi Shankar P for the constructive feedbacks on the writing.
Faculty Opinions recommended
References
1.
Grant J:
How the Philosophical Assumptions of Transactional Analysis Complement the theory of Adult Education.
Transactional Analysis Journal.
2004; 272–276.
2.
Whittle S, Whelan B, Murdoch-Eaton DG:
DREEM and beyond; studies of the educational environment as a means for its enhancement.
Educ Health (Abingdon).
2007; 20
(1): 7. [Online] April 17, 2007. [Cited: August 30th 2010.]. PubMed Abstract
4.
Wilkerson L, Irby DM:
Strategies for improving teaching practices: a comprehensive approach to faculty development.
Acad Med.
1998; 73
(4): 387–96. PubMed Abstract
5.
Marja KL, Susannah T:
Student Teacher's Professional/Personal Through Academic study of Transactional Analysis.
Transactional Analysis Journal.
2004; 253–271.
6.
International Transactional Analysis Association:
T&CC Training and Examinations Handbook Section 4. The TA 101. Reference Source
7.
Temple S:
Update on the Functional Fluency Model in Education.
Transactional Analysis Journal.
2004; 34: 197–204. Reference Source
8.
Steiner C, Campos L, Pearl D, et al.:
A Compilation of Core Concepts.
Transactional Analysis Journal.
2003; 187. Reference Source
9.
Donald AL, Rick H, Martin KM, et al.:
The Ego state Questionnaire – Revised.
Transactional Analysis Journal.
2004; 90–95.
10.
William JT, Jack R, Mark JW:
A New Measure to Analyze Student Performance Using the Likert Scale.
Information Systems Education Journal.
2008; 6(35): 3–9. Reference Source
11.
Smischenko O:
The use of Transactional Analysis Theory in Teaching University Students the Psychology of Relationships.
Transactional Analysis Journal.
2004; 249–252.
12.
Samuel G, Cynthia M, Brown EL:
Transactional Analysis in the College Class Room.
Transactional Analysis Journal.
2004; 243–248.
1
Malankara Orthodox Syrian Church Medical College, Kolenchery, Kerala Pin, 682311, India 2
Faimer Regional Institute, PSG Medical College, Coimbatore, 641004, India
The author is a practicing and training Transactional Analyst and believes it is a useful technique for personal development. She has conducted the training. This may or may not have a bearing on the outcomes of the training and interpretations.
Rajan M and Chacko T. Improving educational environment in medical colleges through transactional analysis practice of teachers [version 1; peer review: 2 approved]. F1000Research 2012, 1:24 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.1-24.v1)
NOTE: If applicable, it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
track
receive updates on this article
Track an article to receive email alerts on any updates to this article.
Share
Open Peer Review
Current Reviewer Status:
?
Key to Reviewer Statuses
VIEWHIDE
ApprovedThe paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations
A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approvedFundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions
Forrest K. Reviewer Report For: Improving educational environment in medical colleges through transactional analysis practice of teachers [version 1; peer review: 2 approved]. F1000Research 2012, 1:24 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.151.r309)
This article describes a practical intervention for faculty development. Faculty development is currently the poor relation within medical
... Continue reading
This article describes a practical intervention for faculty development. Faculty development is currently the poor relation within medical education, and this study provides evidence of how to improve student learning by improving educator insight.
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard.
Forrest K. Reviewer Report For: Improving educational environment in medical colleges through transactional analysis practice of teachers [version 1; peer review: 2 approved]. F1000Research 2012, 1:24 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.151.r309)
McKimm J. Reviewer Report For: Improving educational environment in medical colleges through transactional analysis practice of teachers [version 1; peer review: 2 approved]. F1000Research 2012, 1:24 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.151.r308)
This paper provides an interesting write up of a research project looking at how to introduce Transactional Analysis (TA) into faculty development activities to improve the learning environment.
The methods are sound and relevant to the topic being researched and the
... Continue reading
This paper provides an interesting write up of a research project looking at how to introduce Transactional Analysis (TA) into faculty development activities to improve the learning environment.
The methods are sound and relevant to the topic being researched and the findings consistent with other similar studies, giving evidence-based recommendations about using TA to improve practice.
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard.
McKimm J. Reviewer Report For: Improving educational environment in medical colleges through transactional analysis practice of teachers [version 1; peer review: 2 approved]. F1000Research 2012, 1:24 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.151.r308)
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Approved - the paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations -
A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approved - fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions
Adjust parameters to alter display
View on desktop for interactive features
Includes Interactive Elements
View on desktop for interactive features
Competing Interests Policy
Provide sufficient details of any financial or non-financial competing interests to enable users to assess whether your comments might lead a reasonable person to question your impartiality. Consider the following examples, but note that this is not an exhaustive list:
Examples of 'Non-Financial Competing Interests'
Within the past 4 years, you have held joint grants, published or collaborated with any of the authors of the selected paper.
You have a close personal relationship (e.g. parent, spouse, sibling, or domestic partner) with any of the authors.
You are a close professional associate of any of the authors (e.g. scientific mentor, recent student).
You work at the same institute as any of the authors.
You hope/expect to benefit (e.g. favour or employment) as a result of your submission.
You are an Editor for the journal in which the article is published.
Examples of 'Financial Competing Interests'
You expect to receive, or in the past 4 years have received, any of the following from any commercial organisation that may gain financially from your submission: a salary, fees, funding, reimbursements.
You expect to receive, or in the past 4 years have received, shared grant support or other funding with any of the authors.
You hold, or are currently applying for, any patents or significant stocks/shares relating to the subject matter of the paper you are commenting on.
Stay Updated
Sign up for content alerts and receive a weekly or monthly email with all newly published articles
Comments on this article Comments (0)