Enhancement of digitized X-ray films using Contrast-Limited Adaptive Histogram Equalization (CLAHE)

Wan-Noorshahida Mohd-Isa; Joel Joseph; Noramiza Hashim; Nbhan Salih

doi:10.12688/f1000research.73236.1

Home Browse Enhancement of digitized X-ray films using Contrast-Limited Adaptive...

ALL Metrics

-

Views

-

Downloads

Get PDF

Get XML

Export

▬

✚

Research Article

Enhancement of digitized X-ray films using Contrast-Limited Adaptive Histogram Equalization (CLAHE)

[version 1; peer review: 1 approved, 1 approved with reservations]

Wan-Noorshahida Mohd-Isa ¹, Joel Joseph¹, Noramiza Hashim¹, Nbhan Salih¹

PUBLISHED 15 Oct 2021

Author details Author details

¹ Faculty of Computing and Informatics, Multimedia University, Cyberjaya, Selangor, 63100, Malaysia

Wan-Noorshahida Mohd-Isa
Roles: Conceptualization, Formal Analysis, Project Administration, Supervision, Writing – Original Draft Preparation, Writing – Review & Editing

Joel Joseph
Roles: Data Curation, Investigation, Methodology

Noramiza Hashim
Roles: Conceptualization, Project Administration

Nbhan Salih
Roles: Formal Analysis, Validation

OPEN PEER REVIEW

REVIEWER STATUS

This article is included in the Research Synergy Foundation gateway.

Abstract

Background: Rural clinics still have X-ray facilities that produce physical films, which are sent to the nearest hospital for evaluation. Purchasing digitalization facilities is costly, thus, sending digitized films to the radiologist may be a solution. This can be achieved via digital photo capture. However, there can be different output resolutions that may not be optimized for online diagnosis. This paper investigates if digitized X-ray films can be enhanced using image processing techniques of Contrast-Limited Adaptive Histogram Equalization (CLAHE), Normalized-CLAHE (N-CLAHE) and Min-Max Normalized-CLAHE (MMCLAHE).
Methods: We collected and digitized 21 X-ray films with low, medium, and high resolutions and implemented the CLAHE, N-CLAHE and MMCLAHE image enhancement. These methods introduced a limit to clip the histogram of image intensities so as to reduce any noise amplification before file compression with the Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) and Discrete Cosine Transform (DCT). Quantitative metrics of the Peak Signal-to-Noise Ratio (PSNR) and Mean-Squared Error (MSE) were used to compare the accuracies between digitized and processed X-ray films. A qualitative evaluation was performed by a medical practitioner to validate the accuracy of enhanced digitized X-ray.
Results: It had been found that both CLAHE and MMCLAHE provided good average PSNR values of 31dB - 32dB and produced low MSE values compared to N-CLAHE. The results of qualitative evaluation attained 89.9% correct diagnosis on nine randomly selected images. Generally, the evaluation indicated that the results fulfill the acceptable criteria for further evaluation and there seemed to be no pathological differences observed.
Conclusion: This paper presented a proof of concept on an implementation of the CLAHE technique and its variations on digitized X-ray films. This paper had shown potential improvements with the proposed enhancement methods that may contribute to an increase efficiency in healthcare processes at rural clinics.

Keywords

digital imaging, image enhancement, image compression, histogram equalization, telemedicine

Corresponding author: Wan-Noorshahida Mohd-Isa

Competing interests: No competing interests were disclosed.

Grant information: The author(s) declared that no grants were involved in supporting this work.

Copyright: © 2021 Mohd-Isa WN et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

How to cite: Mohd-Isa WN, Joseph J, Hashim N and Salih N. Enhancement of digitized X-ray films using Contrast-Limited Adaptive Histogram Equalization (CLAHE) [version 1; peer review: 1 approved, 1 approved with reservations]. F1000Research 2021, 10:1051 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.73236.1) First published: 15 Oct 2021, 10:1051 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.73236.1) Latest published: 15 Oct 2021, 10:1051 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.73236.1)

Introduction

The pandemic situation has accelerated digitalization to many countries. However, people living in rural areas are having an inconvenience to access medical technologies due to unavailability of specialists and also shortage of medical equipments.¹ In Malaysia rural clinics, for example, there are still X-ray facilities that produce physical X-ray films. The films are then sent using courier services to the nearest available hospital for diagnosis by radiologists, making the whole process becomes inefficient. Moreover, purchasing new digital X-ray facilities for rural clinics may not be cost beneficial since the population numbers are low.

Digital technology has seen growth that leads to telemedicine.²^–⁴ Telemedicine makes use of communication technology in healthcare and can be cost effective. However, telemedicine is not commonly practiced in Malaysia⁵ despite its potential to address healthcare shortcomings in the rural areas. In this paper, we propose a proof of concept work to digitalize physical X-ray films via digital photo capture so that their digital versions can be sent via email or cloud for evaluation by a radiologist elsewhere. This may improve efficiency in remote diagnosis as well as reducing physical storage.⁶

A study by¹ had described a simple implementation of 70 digitized chest X-ray films using a digital camera with an application of lossy compression technique. The digitized images had been shown in random order to two radiologists for diagnosis at 8 weeks after image capture. Then, lossy compression of different percentages were applied. The compressed images were again shown to the same radiologists in a random order for diagnosis at 8 weeks after the compression. The study achieved a mean percentage of 90% correct diagnosis with compression levels up to 20%. But with a compression of 40% and 50%, the correct percentages were 84% and 80%, respectively.

A similar study by⁷ used an 8-megapixel smartphone on 44 X-ray films consisting of 16 chest and 28 musculo-skeletal. The digitize X-ray films were shown in random order to two radiologists for diagnosis through a LCD cellphone. The accuracy of diagnosis was reported as high. Also it was reported that a diagnosis was difficult when involving uncommon and difficult pathology cases.

These studies purely implemented digital photo capture of X-ray films and performed diagnosis without requiring online transmission. For sending images over the network, small file size with good resolution is best. However, there can be different resolutions due to differences in digital imaging software and hardware, hence, producing different qualities of digital X-ray films.⁸ These variations open an opportunity to explore image enhancement techniques on images of digitized X-ray films.⁹^–¹⁵ In this paper, we investigate the use of CLAHE image processing techniques as a proof of concept and we validate the output via quantitative metrics and qualitative evaluation by a medical practitioner.

Methods

Figure 1 shows the flow of our proposed methodology, which includes, data collection and digitalization, image enhancement and compression, and evaluation. These would be discussed in the preceding sections.

Figure 1. The general processes involved in this research.

Ethical statement

This research project had received approval from the Multimedia University Research Ethics Committee (EA2242021).

Data collection and digitalization

We selected 21 upright chest X-ray images consisting of multiple abnormal diagnoses from multiple online databases.¹⁶ Then, we printed these online sources to obtain the physical chest X-ray films (CXR). After that, the CXR were captured using an Apple iPhone XS Max. To alter the image resolutions, the images were taken using a third-party application, DSLR Camera.¹⁷ An X-ray illuminator (Victor Steel VS148-A) was used as shown in Figure 2.

Figure 2. The camera and illuminator (view box) setup for digitalization of physical X-ray films.

The setup in Figure 2 was done in a well-lit surrounding. A view box was placed on a flat surface approximately 30 cm away from a tripod mounted with a smartphone. A CXR was clipped to the view box in a side-view position with the illuminated area placed facing the smartphone. The position of the tripod head was adjusted to ensure the CXR filled the phone display and the personal details at the corner side were not in view. The flashlight setting was turned off to avoid reflections. The ISO speed was fixed to ISO-24 with an exposure time fixed to 1/100 seconds. Images were taken at High, Medium, and Low resolutions for a total of 63 digitized CXR. These images were stored as a JPEG format and unnecessary details were cropped using Windows 10 Photos application.

Image enhancement

Histogram Equalization (HE) is the commonly used method for image enhancement. In HE the contrast of an image is enhanced by modifying the distribution of pixel intensities. By distributing pixel intensities equally to each histogram, a global equalization is achieved. Thus, HE tends to over-enhance parts of an image that adds unnecessary artifacts and may increase image noise.¹¹

Adaptive Histogram Equalization (AHE) is an improvement of HE. AHE improves local contrast by dividing an image into blocks and applying computations to every block.¹¹ Bilinear interpolation is used to combine all blocks into one image. A study conducted by¹⁰ applied AHE on 50 microfocus X-ray images. It showed that 80% of these had significant increase in contrast and detailing. However, AHE had a slow processing speed and enhanced image noise.

Contrast-Limited Adaptive Histogram Equalization (CLAHE) is an extension of AHE. Similar to AHE, CLAHE uses blocks in an image. The only difference is the addition of a contrast limit to reduce the noise amplification by clipping the histograms.¹⁴ The limit is a predefined value prior to calculation of a Cumulative Distributive Function (CDF). Histograms that exceed the clipped value are redistributed evenly to other histograms instead of removal. A study by⁹ found that images produced from CLAHE had higher pixel values than that of original images and had brought out more details and structure to the images. Both⁹ and¹⁴ had agreed that CLAHE was good at maintaining image brightness level.

A study by¹⁸ proposed Normalized-CLAHE (N-CLAHE) that involved both Normalization function and CLAHE. In this method, a Logarithmic-Normalization function calculated output pixel intensity values by applying a Logarithmic function to input pixel intensity values. Normalization corrected the global intensity value before CLAHE computed the local contrast enhancement value.

The Min-Max Normalized-CLAHE (MMCLAHE) is a method that uses Min-Max values for the pixel intensity values. The pixel intensity is calculated using a ratio between new maximum (newMax) and new minimum (newMin) intensities to previous maximum (Max) and previous minimum (Min) intensity values.

Image compression

Image compression is a process to reduce large-sized images into smaller-sized images without degrading the image quality. In this work, it is required to compress the digitized CXR since these need to be sent to the specialists using a low or moderate network bandwidth. Compression works by reducing the number of bits to represent an image. It has three types, lossless, lossy and hybrid.¹⁹ A hybrid compression combines both lossless and lossy based on region of interest (ROI) and non-ROI of images.²⁰ However, in the absence of subject experts, the ROI could not be determined²¹^–²³ as in our work.

A lossless compression produces high-fidelity reproduction of images but may tend to have large file sizes. On the other hand, lossy compression produces good compression for use in telemedicine that suits rural areas with limited internet connectivity. Thus, in this research, standard lossy image compression techniques such as the Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) and Discrete Cosine Transform (DCT) are used.²⁴

Quantitative evaluation metrics

The Peak Signal-to-Noise Ratio (PSNR) and Mean-Squared Error (MSE) are our quality metrics for comparing the before and after processing of the digitized CXR. A higher PSNR value means better quality of the compressed image. A lower MSE value means less errors contain in the image.

Qualitative evaluation procedure

To validate the diagnosis of the digitized CXR, we invited a medical practitioner to perform a blind evaluation. A randomly selected processed CXR with specific diagnosis were sent to the evaluator. The evaluator was asked to confirm the diagnosis by answering a series of “yes/no” questions and the responses were recorded.

Results and discussion

Table 1 shows the average PSNR and MSE values for each image enhancement and image compression pairs. From this table the results show that CLAHE-DCT gave the lowest average MSE of 35.59 and the highest average PSNR values of 32.85dB compared to other methods. Nevertheless, CLAHE-FFT, MMCLAHE-DCT and MMCLAHE-FFT also attained comparable good values of PSNR at 32.67dB, 31.98dB, and 31.80dB, respectively. Also CLAHE-FFT produced comparable low average MSE results at 36.96. Both MMCLAHE-DCT and MMCLAHE-FFT attained MSE values of 57.16 and 58.71, respectively.

Table 1. Average MSE and PSNR values for each image enhancement and compression techniques.

Image enhancement techniques	Image compression techniques	Average MSE	Average PSNR (dB)
CLAHE	FFT	36.96	32.67
MMCLAHE		58.71	31.81
N-CLAHE		6533.91	10.01
CLAHE	DCT	35.59	32.85
MMCLAHE		57.16	31.98
N-CLAHE		6533.09	10.01

Figure 3 shows samples of processed CXR with a pneumothorax at High resolution level. They are labelled as A, B, C, D, E, F from top-left to bottom-right. Samples of processed CXR for CLAHE and MMCLAHE are in Figure 3 (A, B, C, and D).

Figure 3. Quality evaluation images by medical practitioner. From left-top to right-bottom, Image A, B, C, D, E, F.

On the contrary, both N-CLAHE FFT and N-CLAHE DCT attained the highest MSE and the lowest PSNR values at about 6533 and 10dB, respectively. It can be seen in Figure 3 (E and F) that the N-CLAHE method had produced an overexposure on the digitized CXR.

For qualitative evaluation, samples of Figure 3 were presented to the medical practitioner. Generally, the practitioner was extremely satisfied with the quality of the digitized and processed CXR. Images C and D (using MMCLAHE) were said to be better than Images A and B (using CLAHE). Images E and F (using N-CLAHE) were the worst among all due to overexposure.

Table 2 shows the results of blind qualitative evaluation where nine images were randomly selected for diagnosis. All diagnosis of the presented digitized CXR had managed to be identified without any difficulties except for Image 7. The true diagnosis for Image 7 was Normal. However, the diagnosis reported that there might be some abnormalities present even though Image 7 was a High resolution MMCLAHE-FFT enhanced image. Thus, a simple accuracy attained by the qualitative evaluation is 89.9%, which is comparable to the work of Refs. 1 and 7.

Table 2. Diagnoses results by medical practitioner.

Test image	Description	Expected outcome	Pass/fail	Comment
Image 1	Verify if atelectasis can be detected	Atelectasis can be detected	PASS	-
Image 2	Verify if cardiomegaly can be seen	Cardiomegaly can be seen	PASS	Cardiomegaly can be detected easily without difficulty
Image 3	Verify if covid-19 can be detected	Covid-19 can be detected	PASS	-
Image 4	Verify if emphysema can be detected	Emphysema can be detected	PASS	-
Image 5	Verify if fibrosis can be detected	Fibrosis can be detected	PASS	-
Image 6	Verify if infiltration can be detected	Infiltration can be detected	PASS	Infiltration can be detected but further testing is needed to confirm it
Image 7	Find any abnormalities in the image	No abnormalities should be seen	FAIL	Some abnormalities were seen
Image 8	Verify if pneumonia can be detected	Pneumonia can be detected	PASS	Pneumonia can be seen without any difficulty
Image 9	Verify if tuberculosis can be seen	Tuberculosis can be seen	PASS	-

Also, for Image 6, which was a Medium resolution CLAHE-FFT, it was highlighted that further testing would be required to confirm the diagnosis of Infiltration. Nonetheless it was generally concluded that no pathological differences were observed between all processed CXR and all digitalized CXR.

Conclusions

In this paper, we presented the results of image processing techniques using CLAHE and its variations to enhance digitized X-ray films. Twenty-one physical X-ray films had been digitized via mobile phone capture at Low, Medium, and High resolutions. Three different image enhancement methods with two different image compression techniques had been compared. Results of quantitative evaluation indicated that N-CLAHE may not be a suitable method due to producing an overexposure. Also, the performance of DCT or FFT did not affect the quality of output.

Results of qualitative evaluation further validated the accuracy of the digitized X-ray with a medical practitioner. It had been found that the accuracy of correct diagnosis is close to the work by others in literatures. The overall presentation of the digitized X-ray had been found to be acceptable though some images might require further testing to confirm a diagnosis. Nevertheless, this paper had shown potential improvements with the proposed methods of enhancement that in turn may contribute to an increase efficiency in healthcare processes at rural clinics.

Author contributions

Mohd-Isa W: Conceptualization, Formal Analysis, Project Administration, Supervision, Writing – Original Draft Preparation, Writing – Review & Editing; Joseph J: Data Curation, Investigation, Methodology, Investigation; Hashim N: Conceptualization, Project Administration; Salih N: Formal Analysis, Validation.

Data availability

Figshare: CLAHE-Enhanced X-ray Images DOI: https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.5490822.²⁵

This project contains the following data:

- A collection of processed chest X-ray digitized images with CLAHE, MMCLAHE, N-CLAHE techniques and FFT and DCT compression.

Data are available under the terms of the Creative Commons Zero “No rights reserved” data waiver (CC BY 4.0 Public domain dedication).

Figshare. CLAHE-Enhanced X-ray Images

This project contains the following data:

- Processed images after digitization of physical X-ray films using CLAHE, MMCLAHE, N-CLAHE, and DCT and FFT compression.

Data are available under the terms of the Creative Commons Zero “No rights reserved” data waiver (CC BY 4.0 Public domain dedication).

Acknowledgements

We thank the medical practitioner involved for assisting with evaluation of the results.

References

1. Khodaie M, Askari A, Bahaadinbeigy K: Evaluation of a very low-cost and simple teleradiology technique. J. Digit. Imaging. 2015; 28(3): 295–301. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text
2. Thati J, Sravanthi SB, Narayana YV: Optimized compression techniques for telemedicine therapeutic images. Proceedings of 2016 International Conference on Advanced Communication Control and Computing Technologies, ICACCCT 2016. 2016; 978: 7–11. Publisher Full Text
3. Nasifoglu H: Medical Image Compression for Telemedicine Applications. Archives in Biomedical Eng. & Biotechn. 2019; 2(1): 2–4. Publisher Full Text
4. Conway S: Article - Teleradiology and telemedicine: They are not equal.2016. Reference Source
5. Su-Lyn B: Allow Telemedicine, Malaysia Urged, After Study Finds Higher Covid-19 Risk For Cancer Patients|CodeBlue.2020. Reference Source
6. Sackey AH: A Low-Cost High-Quality Mobile X-ray Film Digitiser with Storage Facilities. SN Comprehensive Clin. Med. 2019; 1(1): 1–3. Publisher Full Text
7. Licurse MY, Kim SH, Kim W, et al.: Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of plain film radiographs between original film and smartphone capture: a pilot study. J. Digit. Imaging. Dec 2015; 28(6): 646–653. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text
8. Westberg M, Vasko T, Owen LS, et al.: Personal smartphones for neonatal diagnostic imaging: A prospective crossover study. J. Paediatr. Child Health. 2017; 53(4): 343–347. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
9. Saenpaen J, Arwatchananukul S, Aunsri N: A comparison of image enhancement methods for lumbar spine X-ray image. ECTI-CON 2018-15^th International Conference on Electrical Engineering/Electronics, Computer, Telecommunications and Information Technology. 2019; 798–801. Publisher Full Text
10. Staroverov NE, Gryaznov AY, Kholopova ED: Digital X-ray image processing with using the adaptive histogram equalization and adaptive background correction. 13th Russian-German Conference on Biomedical Engineering, XIII RGC, 23-25 May 2018, Aachen, Germany. Publisher Full Text
11. Kaur A, Singh C: Contrast enhancement for cephalometric images using wavelet-based modified adaptive histogram equalization. Appl. Soft Comput. 2017; 51: 180–191. Publisher Full Text
12. Magudeeswaran V, Singh JF: Contrast limited fuzzy adaptive histogram equalization for enhancement of brain images. Int. J. Imaging Syst. Technol. 2017; 27(1): 98–103. Publisher Full Text
13. Qiu J, Harold Li H, Zhang T, et al.: Automatic x-ray image contrast enhancement based on parameter auto-optimization. J. Appl. Clin. Med. Phys. 2017; 18(6): 218–223. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text
14. Singh RP, Dixit M: Histogram equalization: a strong technique for image enhancement. Int. J. Sig. Process. Image Process. Pattern Recogn. 2015; 8(8): 345–352. Publisher Full Text
15. Al Wadud MA, Kabir MH, Dewan MAA, et al.: A dynamic histogram equalization for image contrast enhancement. IEEE Trans. Consum. Electron. 2017; 53(2): 593–600. Publisher Full Text
16. Wang X, Peng Y, Lu L, et al.: ChestX-Ray8: Hospital-Scale Chest X-Ray Database and Benchmarks on Weakly-Supervised Classification and Localization of Common Thorax Diseases. 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR). 2017; 3462–3471. Publisher Full Text
17. Scichilone F: DSLR Camera App.2014.Reference Source
18. Koonsanit K, Thongvigitmanee S, Pongnapang N, et al.: Image enhancement on digital X-ray images using N-CLAHE. 10th Biomedical Engineering International Conference 2017. January 2017; 1–4. Publisher Full Text
19. Satone K, Deshmukh A, Ulhe P: A review of image compression techniques. Proceedings of the International Conference on Electronics, Communication and Aerospace Technology, ICECA 2017. Jan 2017; 97–101. Publisher Full Text
20. Ali AH: Medical Image Data Compression using Hybrid Methods. ARPN J. Eng. App. Sci. 2018; 13(5): 1877–1886.Reference Source
21. Aziz SA, Sam SM, Mohamed N, et al.: A review on region of interest-based hybrid medical image compression algorithms. Telkomnika Telecommunication Computing Electronics and Control. 2020; 18(3): 1650–1657. Publisher Full Text
22. Kamargaonkar C, Sharma M: Hybrid medical image compression method using SPIHT algorithm and Haar wavelet transform. International Conference on Electrical, Electronics, and Optimization Techniques, ICEEOT 2016. 2016; 897–900.Publisher Full Text
23. Kaur M, Wasson V: ROI Based Medical Image Compression for Telemedicine Application. Procedia Computer Science. 2015; 70: 579–585. Publisher Full Text
24. Hussain AJ, Al-Fayadh A, Radi N: Image compression techniques: A survey in lossless and lossy algorithms. Neurocomputing. 2018; 300: 44–69. Publisher Full Text
25. Mohd-Isa: CLAHE-Enhanced X-ray Images. figshare. Collection. 2021. Publisher Full Text

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 1

VERSION 1 PUBLISHED 15 Oct 2021

Author details Author details

¹ Faculty of Computing and Informatics, Multimedia University, Cyberjaya, Selangor, 63100, Malaysia

Wan-Noorshahida Mohd-Isa
Roles: Conceptualization, Formal Analysis, Project Administration, Supervision, Writing – Original Draft Preparation, Writing – Review & Editing

Joel Joseph
Roles: Data Curation, Investigation, Methodology

Noramiza Hashim
Roles: Conceptualization, Project Administration

Nbhan Salih
Roles: Formal Analysis, Validation

Competing interests

No competing interests were disclosed.

Grant information

The author(s) declared that no grants were involved in supporting this work.

Article Versions (1)

version 1

Published: 15 Oct 2021, 10:1051

https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.73236.1

Copyright

© 2021 Mohd-Isa WN et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Download

Export To

metrics

	Views	Downloads
F1000Research	-	-
PubMed Central Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.	-	-

Citations

0

SEE MORE DETAILS

CITE

how to cite this article

Mohd-Isa WN, Joseph J, Hashim N and Salih N. Enhancement of digitized X-ray films using Contrast-Limited Adaptive Histogram Equalization (CLAHE) [version 1; peer review: 1 approved, 1 approved with reservations]. F1000Research 2021, 10:1051 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.73236.1)

NOTE: If applicable, it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.

track

receive updates on this article

Track an article to receive email alerts on any updates to this article.

Open Peer Review

Version 1

VERSION 1

PUBLISHED 15 Oct 2021

Views

8

Reviewer Report 20 Sep 2022

Himanshu Singh, Discipline of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Indian Institute of Information Technology, Design and Manufacturing, Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh, India

Approved

https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.76876.r150520

Results of qualitative evaluation further validated the accuracy of the digitized X-ray with a medical practitioner. It had been found that the accuracy of correct diagnosis is close to the work by others in the literature. The overall presentation of ... Continue reading

Results of qualitative evaluation further validated the accuracy of the digitized X-ray with a medical practitioner. It had been found that the accuracy of correct diagnosis is close to the work by others in the literature. The overall presentation of the digitized X-ray had been found to be acceptable though some images might require further testing to confirm a diagnosis. Nevertheless, this paper had shown potential improvements with the proposed methods of enhancement that in turn may contribute to an efficiency increase in healthcare processes at rural clinics.
This manuscript can be accepted.

Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?

Yes
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?

Yes
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?

Yes
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?

Partly
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?

Partly
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?

Yes

Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.

Reviewer Expertise: signal and image processing, machine learning

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard.

CITE

Report a concern

Respond or Comment

Views

11

Reviewer Report 15 Nov 2021

Rubita Sudirman, Division of Electronic and Computer Engineering, School of Electrical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Johor Bahru, Malaysia

Approved with Reservations

https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.76876.r97129

1. The methods provides some overview on how the digital x-ray images are processed, however, this section is missing the important equations to the algorithm employed to perform the processing.

2. Statistical analysis and its interpretation are ... Continue reading

1. The methods provides some overview on how the digital x-ray images are processed, however, this section is missing the important equations to the algorithm employed to perform the processing.

2. Statistical analysis and its interpretation are not cited, to show the performance of CLACHE designed.

3. In the conclusion, some brief numerical results should also be included to strengthen the finding from the study.

4. There is no comparison made to past research, whether in the results or discussion section or in the conclusion. Adding some comparisons would enhance the quality of the paper.

Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?

Yes
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?

Yes
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?

Partly
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?

Partly
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?

Yes
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?

Partly

Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.

Reviewer Expertise: signal processing, image processing, rehabilitation

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard, however I have significant reservations, as outlined above.

CITE

Report a concern

Respond or Comment

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 1

VERSION 1 PUBLISHED 15 Oct 2021

Open Peer Review

Reviewer Status

Reviewer Reports

	Invited Reviewers
	1	2
Version 1 15 Oct 21	read	read

Rubita Sudirman, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Johor Bahru, Malaysia
Himanshu Singh, Indian Institute of Information Technology, Design and Manufacturing, Jabalpur, India

Comments on this article

All Comments(0)

Add a comment

Sign up for content alerts

Browse by related subjects

Back to all reports

Reviewer Report

8 Views

20 Sep 2022 | for Version 1

Himanshu Singh, Discipline of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Indian Institute of Information Technology, Design and Manufacturing, Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh, India

8 Views Cite this report Responses(0)

Approved

Results of qualitative evaluation further validated the accuracy of the digitized X-ray with a medical practitioner. It had been found that the accuracy of correct diagnosis is close to the work by others in the literature. The overall presentation of the digitized X-ray had been found to be acceptable though some images might require further testing to confirm a diagnosis. Nevertheless, this paper had shown potential improvements with the proposed methods of enhancement that in turn may contribute to an efficiency increase in healthcare processes at rural clinics.
This manuscript can be accepted.

Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?

Yes
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?

Yes
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?

Yes
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?

Partly
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?

Partly
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?

Yes

Competing Interests

No competing interests were disclosed.

Reviewer Expertise

signal and image processing, machine learning

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard.

Respond to this report

Responses (0)

Back to all reports

Reviewer Report

11 Views

15 Nov 2021 | for Version 1

Rubita Sudirman, Division of Electronic and Computer Engineering, School of Electrical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Johor Bahru, Malaysia

11 Views Cite this report Responses(0)

Approved With Reservations

1. The methods provides some overview on how the digital x-ray images are processed, however, this section is missing the important equations to the algorithm employed to perform the processing.

2. Statistical analysis and its interpretation are not cited, to show the performance of CLACHE designed.

3. In the conclusion, some brief numerical results should also be included to strengthen the finding from the study.

4. There is no comparison made to past research, whether in the results or discussion section or in the conclusion. Adding some comparisons would enhance the quality of the paper.

Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?

Yes
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?

Yes
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?

Partly
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?

Partly
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?

Yes
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?

Partly

Competing Interests

No competing interests were disclosed.

Reviewer Expertise

signal processing, image processing, rehabilitation

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard, however I have significant reservations, as outlined above.

Respond to this report

Responses (0)

[1] 1. Khodaie M, Askari A, Bahaadinbeigy K: Evaluation of a very low-cost and simple teleradiology technique. J. Digit. Imaging. 2015; 28(3): 295–301. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text

[2] 2. Thati J, Sravanthi SB, Narayana YV: Optimized compression techniques for telemedicine therapeutic images. Proceedings of 2016 International Conference on Advanced Communication Control and Computing Technologies, ICACCCT 2016. 2016; 978: 7–11. Publisher Full Text

[3] 3. Nasifoglu H: Medical Image Compression for Telemedicine Applications. Archives in Biomedical Eng. & Biotechn. 2019; 2(1): 2–4. Publisher Full Text

[4] 4. Conway S: Article - Teleradiology and telemedicine: They are not equal.2016. Reference Source

[5] 5. Su-Lyn B: Allow Telemedicine, Malaysia Urged, After Study Finds Higher Covid-19 Risk For Cancer Patients|CodeBlue.2020. Reference Source

[6] 6. Sackey AH: A Low-Cost High-Quality Mobile X-ray Film Digitiser with Storage Facilities. SN Comprehensive Clin. Med. 2019; 1(1): 1–3. Publisher Full Text

[7] 7. Licurse MY, Kim SH, Kim W, et al.: Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of plain film radiographs between original film and smartphone capture: a pilot study. J. Digit. Imaging. Dec 2015; 28(6): 646–653. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text

[8] 8. Westberg M, Vasko T, Owen LS, et al.: Personal smartphones for neonatal diagnostic imaging: A prospective crossover study. J. Paediatr. Child Health. 2017; 53(4): 343–347. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[9] 9. Saenpaen J, Arwatchananukul S, Aunsri N: A comparison of image enhancement methods for lumbar spine X-ray image. ECTI-CON 2018-15^th International Conference on Electrical Engineering/Electronics, Computer, Telecommunications and Information Technology. 2019; 798–801. Publisher Full Text

[10] 10. Staroverov NE, Gryaznov AY, Kholopova ED: Digital X-ray image processing with using the adaptive histogram equalization and adaptive background correction. 13th Russian-German Conference on Biomedical Engineering, XIII RGC, 23-25 May 2018, Aachen, Germany. Publisher Full Text

[11] 11. Kaur A, Singh C: Contrast enhancement for cephalometric images using wavelet-based modified adaptive histogram equalization. Appl. Soft Comput. 2017; 51: 180–191. Publisher Full Text

[12] 12. Magudeeswaran V, Singh JF: Contrast limited fuzzy adaptive histogram equalization for enhancement of brain images. Int. J. Imaging Syst. Technol. 2017; 27(1): 98–103. Publisher Full Text

[13] 13. Qiu J, Harold Li H, Zhang T, et al.: Automatic x-ray image contrast enhancement based on parameter auto-optimization. J. Appl. Clin. Med. Phys. 2017; 18(6): 218–223. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text

[14] 14. Singh RP, Dixit M: Histogram equalization: a strong technique for image enhancement. Int. J. Sig. Process. Image Process. Pattern Recogn. 2015; 8(8): 345–352. Publisher Full Text

[15] 15. Al Wadud MA, Kabir MH, Dewan MAA, et al.: A dynamic histogram equalization for image contrast enhancement. IEEE Trans. Consum. Electron. 2017; 53(2): 593–600. Publisher Full Text

[16] 16. Wang X, Peng Y, Lu L, et al.: ChestX-Ray8: Hospital-Scale Chest X-Ray Database and Benchmarks on Weakly-Supervised Classification and Localization of Common Thorax Diseases. 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR). 2017; 3462–3471. Publisher Full Text

[17] 17. Scichilone F: DSLR Camera App.2014.Reference Source

[18] 18. Koonsanit K, Thongvigitmanee S, Pongnapang N, et al.: Image enhancement on digital X-ray images using N-CLAHE. 10th Biomedical Engineering International Conference 2017. January 2017; 1–4. Publisher Full Text

[19] 19. Satone K, Deshmukh A, Ulhe P: A review of image compression techniques. Proceedings of the International Conference on Electronics, Communication and Aerospace Technology, ICECA 2017. Jan 2017; 97–101. Publisher Full Text

[20] 20. Ali AH: Medical Image Data Compression using Hybrid Methods. ARPN J. Eng. App. Sci. 2018; 13(5): 1877–1886.Reference Source

[21] 21. Aziz SA, Sam SM, Mohamed N, et al.: A review on region of interest-based hybrid medical image compression algorithms. Telkomnika Telecommunication Computing Electronics and Control. 2020; 18(3): 1650–1657. Publisher Full Text

[22] 22. Kamargaonkar C, Sharma M: Hybrid medical image compression method using SPIHT algorithm and Haar wavelet transform. International Conference on Electrical, Electronics, and Optimization Techniques, ICEEOT 2016. 2016; 897–900.Publisher Full Text

[23] 23. Kaur M, Wasson V: ROI Based Medical Image Compression for Telemedicine Application. Procedia Computer Science. 2015; 70: 579–585. Publisher Full Text

[24] 24. Hussain AJ, Al-Fayadh A, Radi N: Image compression techniques: A survey in lossless and lossy algorithms. Neurocomputing. 2018; 300: 44–69. Publisher Full Text

[25] 25. Mohd-Isa: CLAHE-Enhanced X-ray Images. figshare. Collection. 2021. Publisher Full Text

Enhancement of digitized X-ray films using Contrast-Limited Adaptive Histogram Equalization (CLAHE)

Abstract

Keywords

Introduction

Methods

Figure 1. The general processes involved in this research.

Ethical statement

Data collection and digitalization

Figure 2. The camera and illuminator (view box) setup for digitalization of physical X-ray films.

Image enhancement

Image compression

Quantitative evaluation metrics

Qualitative evaluation procedure

Results and discussion

Table 1. Average MSE and PSNR values for each image enhancement and compression techniques.

Figure 3. Quality evaluation images by medical practitioner. From left-top to right-bottom, Image A, B, C, D, E, F.

Table 2. Diagnoses results by medical practitioner.

Conclusions

Author contributions

Data availability

Acknowledgements

References

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Open Peer Review

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Open Peer Review

Reviewer Status

Reviewer Reports

Comments on this article

Browse by related subjects

Competing Interests Policy

Stay Updated