Keywords
good death, palliative care, acute disease, infectious disease, health systems
good death, palliative care, acute disease, infectious disease, health systems
The revised version include responses to reviewer comments with several major differences to the previous version as follow;
1. Clarification on the framework that is used i.e., the Arksey and O’ Malley Framework.
2. The reasons for the use of scoping review, which we highlighted in the protocol section.
3. The elaboration of study designs included in the scoping review, and
4. Several updates on the keywords that are used in the scoping review.
To read any peer review reports and author responses for this article, follow the "read" links in the Open Peer Review table.
Palliative care is provided for a person with an active, progressive and advanced disease who is in serious or life-threatening health conditions.1,2 Palliative care aims to optimize the quality of life and addresses the physical suffering of the patient. Furthermore, the palliative care also aims to improve psychological, social and spiritual conditions for patients and their family members.1–3 Palliative care involves a multidisciplinary team beyond healthcare professionals, including spiritual, psychology, and/or social worker team member.4–6 Palliative care is designed as a person-centered and family-centered care, addressing each patient’s and family members specific conditions and needs.7,8 There are two types of palliative care, namely terminal palliative care which focuses on the treatment of immediate disease symptoms, and early palliative care that provides patients and family members support for coping with the diagnosis and helps balance decision-making between values and preferences of the patient and realistic expectations of the outcome of treatment.9 In low to middle income countries, dissimilarity of access to palliative care shows great disparities in global health care.2,10 The concept of palliative care is more commonly discussed and studied in chronic diseases, however, there is still lacking evidence on palliative care on acute diseases.
Acute diseases, such as infections, injuries, acute exacerbations of chronic illnesses, are sudden, rapid and severe diseases that last for a brief time period.11,12 High mortality rate might be found on acute emergency admission, especially amongst the elderly with multiple co-morbid conditions.13 Therefore, palliative care should be an important component in acute disease management, particularly for severe cases.
The concept of palliative care is also closely related to perceived good death. Good death or successful dying is defined as the person’s preferences for the dying process. These preferences might include how, where, when, pain-free status of dying process.14,15 The concept of good death also include who accompanied the person during the dying process, and the manner of facing death (i.e. awareness and readiness of the dying process, natural or sudden death).14–16 Ironically, studies have shown that patients with contagious disease have been isolated from their family members due to hospital policies and many of them have a deep fear of dying alone.15,17 Majority of people want to be with their loved ones when their life comes to an end.15,18
Up until now, there have been limited summaries on the experience of palliative care and concept of good death in acute diseases. Further, there is a lack of information on the ideal concept of palliative care and good death in acute disease from the perspective of patients, family or caregivers, as well as healthcare providers. This scoping review aims to explore the concept of palliative care and good death for acute diseases from the perspective of patients, families, and providers, hence, depicting the existing palliative care and good death concepts, and providing recommendation on the ideal concept of palliative care and good death in acute diseases.
This study focuses on exploring existing literature on the concept of palliative care and good death in acute illness among patients with critical or severe acute diseases and the family and healthcare providers. As for the context of this scoping review, all health facilities which provide palliative care for acute disease will be included. The literatures will be beyond specific types of studies, we think that the broader concept in scoping review will be more appropriate.19 To conduct this scoping review, the framework by Arksey and O’Malley will be used.20 The framework consist of six steps: 1) identification of research questions; 2) identification of relevant studies; 3) selection of relevant studies; 4) data extraction and charting, 5) summary, analyses, and reporting; and 6) consultation with relevant stakeholders.20 The search process, database creation and data extraction will be conducted from September to October 2021. The analysis and reporting will be carried out in December 2021 - April 2022.
Considering the study aims, the research questions can be further elaborated as follows:
1. What is the experience of patients, family of patients, and healthcare providers regarding palliative care for acute diseases?
2. What is the experience of patients, family of patients, and healthcare providers regarding good death due to acute illness?”
3. What is the perception of family of patients, and healthcare providers regarding an ideal palliative care for patients with acute diseases?
4. What is the perception of family of patients, and healthcare providers regarding what is considered as good deaths among patients with acute diseases?
To obtain perception of good death in acute diseases, studies which include perception of family and healthcare providers of patients who died due to acute diseases will be reviewed (Table 1).
This scoping review includes the relevant studies based on the inclusion and selection criteria shown on Table 1. The format followed the Arksey and O’ Malley Framework.20
The search strategy using keywords and queries can be found in Table 2. The literature search will be conducted in three databases (Pubmed, Scopus, and Science Direct) for articles published between January 2000 to October 2021, hence, providing a review of literature for the past 20 years.
The search strategy will use Medical Subject Heading (MesH) terms: “Acute Disease”, “Palliative Care”, and “Good Death” on the Pubmed database. An initial search with synonyms of those keywords will be used in the Scopus and ScienceDirect database. Next, analysis of the words contained in the title and abstract will be done. Clinical guidelines database and gray literature will be included and listed in Figure 1.
Two authors will screen the titles and abstracts of studies according to the selection criteria. In the scoping review, we will include all studies that evaluate the acute disease palliative care and good death. We will exclude studies focusing on chronic disease. Quantitative, qualitative, as well as mixed methods studies will be included. We will also include guidelines on palliative care and good death found in the literature, to provide comprehensive view. Two authors will review the full text of selected studies independently. We will resolve disagreements on study selection and data extraction by discussion with one more reviewer if needed. The details of the study selection are depicted in Figure 2.
The two reviewers will independently chart the data, discuss the results and continuously update the data-charting form in an iterative process. Data extraction will be carried out following the form that has been prepared in Table 3.
To summarize the findings, a table will be developed mapping all the studies included in the scoping review. Studies will be categorized by different characteristics, including type of sources, study location, study design, as well as types of integration. EndNote 20 software will be used to store and managed the data obtained from the literature.
After data extraction, a table will be developed to summarize and map the findings. Studies will be categorized based on several distinct characteristics. For example: study sample (patients, family or caregiver of patients, and healthcare providers), experience and perception of ideal concept for palliative care and good deaths, and level of healthcare service where the palliative care is provided, or death occurred. Qualitative analyses by using thematic coding will be conducted to present a robust summary of the literature on experience and perception regarding palliative care and good death in acute diseases.
The results will be consulted to the experts and relevant stakeholders, which include patients, families, and caregivers. As this scoping review will be the basis for recommendation on palliative care and good death for people with acute diseases in Indonesia, relevant stakeholders will be identified from Indonesia. This step is important to ensure that the finding is validated, receive feedback and obtain additional insights into the findings. In the discussion, findings from the scoping review will be presented with feedback by relevant stakeholders provided.
We have obtained ethical permits for this review. The results of this review can be used as a reference for preparing a pilot study on integrated management of acute disease palliative care and good death management as well as policy briefs, presentations in conferences, peer-reviewed journals, and information on related websites.
This study is now at early stage of the step two of the scoping review process: identification of relevant studies. We are still searching for literature for relevant studies and abstracting data from the search engines. We estimated the scoping review to be completed by mid-2022.
Views | Downloads | |
---|---|---|
F1000Research | - | - |
PubMed Central
Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.
|
- | - |
Is the rationale for, and objectives of, the study clearly described?
Partly
Is the study design appropriate for the research question?
No
Are sufficient details of the methods provided to allow replication by others?
No
Are the datasets clearly presented in a useable and accessible format?
Partly
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Reviewer Expertise: Palliative care
Is the rationale for, and objectives of, the study clearly described?
Yes
Is the study design appropriate for the research question?
Partly
Are sufficient details of the methods provided to allow replication by others?
No
Are the datasets clearly presented in a useable and accessible format?
Not applicable
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Reviewer Expertise: Health services research and palliative care
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Invited Reviewers | ||
---|---|---|
1 | 2 | |
Version 2 (revision) 13 Apr 22 |
read | |
Version 1 12 Nov 21 |
read |
Provide sufficient details of any financial or non-financial competing interests to enable users to assess whether your comments might lead a reasonable person to question your impartiality. Consider the following examples, but note that this is not an exhaustive list:
Sign up for content alerts and receive a weekly or monthly email with all newly published articles
Already registered? Sign in
The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.
You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.
You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.
If your email address is registered with us, we will email you instructions to reset your password.
If you think you should have received this email but it has not arrived, please check your spam filters and/or contact for further assistance.
Comments on this article Comments (0)