ALL Metrics
-
Views
-
Downloads
Get PDF
Get XML
Cite
Export
Track
Retraction

RETRACTED: A low-cost in-house HIV integrase strand transfer inhibitor drug resistance test for resource-limited settings

[version 1; peer review: not peer reviewed]
PUBLISHED 20 Apr 2021
Author details Author details
OPEN PEER REVIEW
NOT PEER REVIEWED

At the request of the authors, the article titled 'A low-cost in-house HIV integrase strand transfer inhibitor drug resistance test for resource-limited settings' ([version 1; peer review: awaiting peer review]. F1000Research 2021, 10:260, https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.28404.1) has been retracted from F1000Research.

Since publication, it has come to the attention of the authors that the primers described in Table 1 were incorrect. As this article contains information which should not be publicly available the content of the article has been removed.  The authors apologise for this honest error, and intend to republish the article with the correct primer information. Unfortunately, Dr Graeme B. Jacobs has passed away since publication of version 1 of this article.

Keywords

HIV, HIV Drug Resistance, Drug Resistance Testing (DRT), Integrase Strand Transfer Inhibitors (INSTIs), Assay Validation, Accuracy, Precision, Reproducibility, Amplification

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 1
VERSION 1 PUBLISHED 20 Apr 2021
Comment
Author details Author details
Competing interests
Grant information
Copyright
Download
 
Export To
metrics
Views Downloads
F1000Research - -
PubMed Central
Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.
- -
Citations
CITE
how to cite this article
Onwong'a VM, Gachogo RW, Masika MM et al. RETRACTED: A low-cost in-house HIV integrase strand transfer inhibitor drug resistance test for resource-limited settings [version 1; peer review: not peer reviewed]. F1000Research 2021, 10:306 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.52954.1)
NOTE: If applicable, it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
track
receive updates on this article
Track an article to receive email alerts on any updates to this article.

Current Reviewer Status:
NOT PEER REVIEWED
NOT PEER REVIEWED

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 1
VERSION 1 PUBLISHED 20 Apr 2021
Comment
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Approved - the paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations - A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approved - fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions
Sign In
If you've forgotten your password, please enter your email address below and we'll send you instructions on how to reset your password.

The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.

Email address not valid, please try again

You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.

You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.

Code not correct, please try again
Email us for further assistance.
Server error, please try again.