Keywords
children, rare (orphan) disorders, monogenic connective tissue disorders, clinical findings, FKBP14 gene, c.362dupC duplication
children, rare (orphan) disorders, monogenic connective tissue disorders, clinical findings, FKBP14 gene, c.362dupC duplication
Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (EDS) is commonly encountered by various medical specialists. It is mainly characterized by skin hyperelasticity, joint hypermobility, easy bruising, and hypertrophic scarring. The disorder is genetically heterogeneous: according to the 2017 classification, there are 13 clinical genetic types,1 divided into seven groups depending on the pathogenesis. The kyphoscoliotic type belongs to the B group – disorders of collagen folding and collagen cross-linking – or type VI in the 1997 classification. Patients with kyphoscoliotic type come to the attention of pediatricians, neurologists, and orthopaedists.
EDS kyphoscoliotic type is an autosomal recessive disorder with estimated prevalence of one per 100,000 newborns.2 Its main symptoms (major clinical diagnostics criteria) are severe muscle hypotonia at birth (“floppiness”), early-onset kyphoscoliosis (usually progressive), hypermobility of joints, dislocations/subluxations (especially of knee joints).1 Additional (minor) diagnostic criteria include skin hyperelasticity, easy bruising, arterial ruptures/aneurisms, osteopenia/osteoporosis, bluish sclerae, umbilical/inguinal hernia, thorax deformations, marfanoid habitus, equinovarus feet deformities, myopia.
EDS kyphoscoliotic type is currently subdivided into two subtypes. EDS kyphoscoliotic type 1 (EDSKS1) is caused by mutations in the PLOD1 gene (1p36.22), which encodes lysyl hydroxylase, a catalyst essential for the stability of the intermolecular collagen crosslinks.3,4 EDS kyphoscoliotic type 2 (EDSKS2) is caused by mutations in the FKBP14 gene (7p14.3), which encodes the FKBP22 protein. FKBP22 is a highly conservative peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase (PPIase), which catalyzes collagen folding and acts as a chaperone to collagen types III, VI, X.5 Thus, both genes are tied to collagen spatial structure formation.
These two subtypes are clinically similar, but slightly different. Mutations in the PLOD1 gene lead to moderate scarring and bruisability, microcornea, scleral and ocular ruptures, and facial abnormalities (low set ears, epicanthal folds, downslanting eyes, synophrys, high-arched palate). EDSKS2 is less explored because of its recent discovery and lower frequency. Some patients show signs of hearing loss (sensorineural, conductive or mixed) that were not present at birth, as well as follicular hyperkeratosis, muscular atrophy, and bladder diverticulum.
Because this EDS type is less frequent and not fully explored, in this study we present the clinical data of five patients with EDSKS2.
Five patients were examined using clinical and laboratory methods in the clinical genetics department of Veltischev Research and Clinical Institute for Pediatrics, Moscow, Russia. Molecular genetic analysis was carried out in the DNA diagnostics laboratory of Research Centre for Medical Genetics, Moscow, Russia.
DNA samples used for the analysis were extracted from whole blood samples using a Wizard® Genomic DNA Purification Kit (Promega, USA) according to the manufacturer's protocol.
The sequence of the FKBP14 gene ((Accession number NG_032173.1 (genomic), Accession number NM_017946.4 (mRNA)) was analyzed for possible mutations via direct automated Sanger sequencing. Primer sequences, МgCl2 concentrations and primer annealing temperatures are presented in Table 1. PCR products were sequenced using the ABI PRISM Big Dye Terminator (v 3.1) Cycle Sequencing Kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) on an ABI3130xl Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA).
Sequencing results were analyzed using BLAST (Basic Local Alignment Search Tool) (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/blast) to compare a subject nucleotide sequence with the database. In our research we worked with search database Human genomic plus transcript (Human G+T) using blastn (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Class/MLACourse/Modules/BLAST/nucleotide_blast.html) (Optimized for somewhat similar sequences).
We examined five patients with EDSKS2: three boys and two girls with age ranging from two to fifteen years (Table 2). In four families, the marriage did not appear to be consanguineous. However, in family number (no.) 3 (girl, 11 years) both parents had distant relatives originating from the same small village, which could potentially mean kinship.
The study was approved by the Ethics committee of the Research and Clinical Institute of Pediatrics (approval number #2, 2021) named after Yuri Veltischev of the Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation. A written informed consent was obtained from the participants and parents of participants under the age of 18 to take part in the study. The study was done in accordance with the principles outlined in the Helsinki Declaration (1964).
All patients had moderate to severe kyphoscoliosis, early motor development delay, muscular weakness, hypotonia, and hearing impairment (Table 2). Figure 1 and Figure 2 (a, b) show main phenotypic characteristics of patients no. 3 and 5 with EDSKS2. Physical development of the children at the time of examination varied. Probands no. 1 and 4 (three and fifteen years respectively) had very low, harmonic development (all values below third percentile). Patients no. 3 and 5 (eleven and two years respectively) had disharmonic physical development (no. 3 - average body length 25–50 percentile and very high mass >97 percentile; no. 5 - above average body length 50–75 percentile and below average mass 10–25 percentile). Patient no. 2 had high, harmonic physical development: all values above 90–97 percentile.
The age of kyphoscoliosis formation varied from eight to twenty-four months. Clinical examination and X-ray showed thoracolumbar kyphoscoliosis in all five cases. Three children (aged two, three, eight years) had kyphoscoliosis of the 2nd degree, while the older patients (11 and 15 years) had kyphoscoliosis of the 3rd and 4th degree respectively. Probands no. 2 and 4 (eight and fifteen years), aside from kyphoscoliosis, had pectus excavatum of the 2nd degree. Patients no. 1, 3, 4, and 5 had pes planovalgus. X-ray showed signs of osteoporosis in patients no. 1, 3, and 5. In addition to this, patient 1 had spina bifida sacralis dorsalis S3–S5.
Joint hypermobility was evaluated as eight on the Beighton scale for four patients and as six for one patient (Patient no. 5). Four patients did not reach the maximum score of nine because of the rigid spine with restricted flexibility.
History analysis for all five probands showed early motor development delay, decrease of tendon reflexes, “floppiness”, and positive Gowers' sign. Myopathy did not progress with age. Intellectual development was normal in four children, and patient no. 3 (girl, 11 years) had a slight developmental delay – her IQ was 80 (normal values 85–115).
Apprehensive analysis of internal organs showed pathological alterations, the most notable were cardiovascular and bronchopulmonary problems. ECG detected sinus arrhythmia of varying degree in three patients (no. 1, 3, and 4). Echocardiography results revealed open ductus arteriosus in two patients (no. 1 and 2), and borderline (17mm) narrowed aorta at sinotubular junction (Patient no. 3). According to spirometry results, combined respiratory pulmonary function impairments were found in three probands. It was impossible to carry out spirometry for two patients due to their age (two and three years). Bilateral nephroptosis was detected in two children (Patient no. 1 and 2), left side nephroptosis was noted in one patient (no. 5) as well as midshaft hypospadia.
Hearing loss, another main feature of EDSKS2, was diagnosed in three patients (three, eleven, and fifteen years). Mild to moderate bilateral sensorineural hearing loss was revealed in the 11-year-old girl (Patient no. 3) and 15-year-old boy (Patient no. 4), mild bilateral mixed hearing loss was detected in a three-year-old boy (Patient no. 5). Ophthalmologic problems were diagnosed in three children, and the most severe alterations were in the 15-year-old boy (Patient no. 4). He had progressive high myopia with astigmatism and right side chorioretinitis without signs of inflammation. Patient no. 1 (three-year-old boy) had mild bilateral hypermetropia and Patient no. 5 (two-year-old boy) had mixed bilateral astigmatism.
Blood and urine tests, as well as biochemical analysis indicating basic metabolism levels, were normal in all five patients.
A homozygous c.362dupC pathogenic variant in exon 3 of the FKBP14 gene was detected in all five patients (Accession number VCV000279809.13) (Figure 3).6
We present a brief highlight of a child’s clinical history (no. 4).
Z., a 15-year-old boy, was admitted to a clinic with complaints of progressive thoracolumbar kyphoscoliosis, pectus excavatum, muscular weakness, fatigue impairing his ability to engage in physical activities and to walk independently for a moderate period of time, vision and hearing impairments.
The proband was born to young healthy non-related parents (Figure 4). His mother is currently 45-years-old, and his father is 41-years-old. The proband was from the third pregnancy, second delivery. It was established that the firstborn child was also male with the same clinical picture. He underwent multiple surgical operations to correct stage 4 kyphoscoliosis, but the last operation at the age of nine years was fatal.
Roman numerals - generation number, Arabic numerals - family member number, numbers inside figures - family member's age, crossed out figures - deceased family member.
The second pregnancy was aborted medically on the mother’s request. The third pregnancy was complicated by gestosis with risk of termination in trimesters I and II, but resulted in timely physiological delivery. The newborn’s mass was 3000 g, body length 51 cm, APGAR score 6/7. Neonatologists stated the child’s limbs were in the position of adduction. Early motor development was delayed: he started holding his head around the age of six months, sitting up at 12 months, walking independently at three years. At the age of two years progressive thoracolumbar kyphoscoliosis and pectus excavatum were noted. The child was under medical observation at the place of residence, received symptomatic therapy, including sanatorial treatment. However, the disorder kept progressing, and its origin was unclear to specialists. Some form of progressive muscular dystrophy was suggested; in order to obtain a clearer diagnosis, the patient was referred to the clinical genetics department of Veltischev Research and Clinical Institute for Pediatrics, Moscow, Russia.
Upon admission, the proband’s condition was evaluated to be moderate to severe, in accordance with his main disorder. His physical development was very low, harmonic: body length - 140 cm, mass - 31 kg respectively (below third percentile). The following phenotypic features were the most notable (Figure 5): thoracolumbar kyphoscoliosis of the 4th degree, pectus excavatum of the 2nd degree, pes planovalgus, joint hypermobility (eight on the Beighton scale), fatigue, muscular weakness resulting in Gowers’ maneuvers. Tendon reflexes were absent. Intellectual development corresponded to age.
a) Proband no. 4: very low height and body mass (<3 percentile), thoracolumbar kyphoscoliosis of the 4th degree, pectus excavatum of the 2nd degree; b) Proband no. 4: thoracolumbar kyphoscoliosis of the 4th degree, long thin limbs, pes planovalgus.
Cardiac functional examination showed moderate sinus arrhythmia with periods of tachycardia, heart rate was 115–88 bpm. Echocardiography showed no heart defects: the chambers were not enlarged, the valves were intact, the contractory function of the myocardium was satisfactory, the diastolic function was normal, false chordae was detected in the left ventricle.
External ventilation function analysis showed profound combined respiratory pulmonary function impairment. Ultrasound examination of abdominal organs and kidneys did not reveal any pathology.
X-ray examination of the thoracolumbar spine region (dorsal-plantar and lateral) confirmed the presence of S-shaped stage 4 thoracolumbar scoliosis.
The electroneuromyography data indicated the muscular type of lesion: a slight decrease in the amplitudes of M-waves, a decrease in the amplitudes and duration of the motor unit action potentials (MUAPs), accelerated recruitment of the MUAPs; interference pattern analysis (IPA) indicators were below the standard limits.
Pure tone threshold audiometry showed mild to moderate bilateral sensorineural hearing loss. An ophtalmologist’s examination showed progressive high myopia with astigmatism, as well as OD chorioretinitis without signs of inflammation.
Blood and urine tests, as well as biochemical analysis indicating basic metabolism levels, were normal. Creatine kinase level was 167 upl, reference values 15–190 upl.
Clinical data suggested kyphoscoliotic type Ehlers-Danlos syndrome; it was also necessary to exclude congenital muscular dystrophy. The latter was suggested based on the congenital nature of the disorder, motor development delay, absence of tendon reflexes, muscular strength decrease, Gowers’ maneuvers, and electroneuromyography results. However, the slow muscular pathology progression with fast kyphoscoliosis progression (stage 4), normal CK levels, severe hypermobility syndrome (eight on the Beighton scale), and mild to moderate hearing loss called the diagnosis of primary muscular pathology into question. Molecular genetic analysis results showed a c.362dupC mutation in a homozygous state in exon 3 of the FKBP14 gene. The boy’s parents had this mutation in a heterozygous state. These acquired results allowed us to confirm the EDSKS2 diagnosis.
The proband’s family was given medical genetic counselling, according to which the risk of an affected child was 25%. The couple was inclined towards preimplantation diagnostics.
In 2012, Baumann et al.5 used genetic mapping to describe the FKBP14 gene as a cause of Ehlers-Danlos syndrome kyphoscoliotic type. Since that moment, less than 30 such patients have been described in the medical literature.5,7–10 To date, according to The Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD), eight pathogenic variants are described in the FKBP14 gene. The most common variant is the c.362dupC duplication, detected in 11 out of 17 patients by Giunta et al. (2018).9 The majority of patients with this variant are Caucasian from various countries: UK, Austria, Croatia, Poland, etc. One Columbian patient has been reported.10 The c.362dupC duplication was detected in a homozygous state in all five of our non-related patients from different regions of Russia. Baumann et al. (2012)5 suggested the presence of a founder effect. However, a recurrent mutation caused by replication slippage in the polycytidine tract cannot be excluded.
The FKBP14 gene encodes the FKBP22 protein, which is endoplasmic reticulum (ER) resident and controls post-translational modification of polypeptide chains containing hydroxyproline. FKBP22, a peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase, is a collagen folding catalyst and interacts with collagen types III, VI, and X.5,11 FKBP14-deficient skin fibroblast examination showed normal proportion and electrophoretic mobility of type I, III, and V collagen α-chains. Immunofluorescence revealed disorganisation of extracellular matrix proteins – collagen types I, III, VI, fibronectin, tenascins. Electronic microphotography of skin fibroblasts showed ER cisternae enlargement, fragmentation of elastic fibers. Symptoms of EDSKS1 and EDSKS2 are very similar: progressive kyphoscoliosis, severe congenital muscular hypotonia, hypermobility syndrome, skin hyperelasticity, medium arterial ruptures, osteopenia/osteoporosis. Diagnostic differentiation criteria: PLOD1-associated kyphoscoliotic type 1 - marfanoid phenotype, profound skin bruisability, scleral and ocular ruptures; FKBP14-associated kyphoscoliotic type 2 - hearing loss, follicular hyperkeratosis, muscular atrophy, bladder diverticulum. In addition, lysyl pyridinoline (LP) and hydroxylysyl pyridinoline (HP) excretion analysis may be useful - LP/HP ratio is increased in the case of kyphoscoliotic type 1.
Clinical findings in our patients corresponded to those described in the literature.2,5 The main symptom was progressive kyphoscoliosis in varying stages depending on the age. Three out of five patients had hearing loss, which is described in 73% of kyphoscoliotic type 2 cases.4 The exact pathogenesis of this impairment is unclear. Three patients had osteoporosis; according to the literature, it is one of the minor diagnostic criteria, leading to fractures in 13% of cases.4,9 Three children had congenital malformations affecting three systems: cardiovascular (open ductus arteriosus, borderline narrowed aorta), skeleto-muscular (spina bifida sacralis dorsalis S3-S5), and genital (midshaft hypospadia). Karyotype analysis and chromosomal microarray analysis did not show any abnormalities.
As shown in the literature, there are various types of Ehlers-Danlos syndrome with vascular complications (vascular, classic, classic-like, musculocontractural), which should be considered in differential diagnostics.1,7,12 These complications in kyphoscoliotic type 2 patients could be caused by a pathogenetic link of the FKBP14 gene with type III collagen, which is a significant component of vascular structure.13
Kyphoscoliotic type 2 with symptoms of severe muscular atrophy has to be differentiated from Ullrich and Bethlem myopathy, which is caused by type VI collagen defects. The latter does not cause skin hyperelasticity, ecchymoses, hearing loss, but does cause striae, atrophic scars, respiratory abnormalities, and major joint contractures, uncharacteristic of EDSKS2.
Without any doubt, with such similarities in clinical pictures of EDSKS2 and the above-mentioned disorders, the final diagnosis has to be verified by molecular genetic analysis.
Literature analysis and examination of five EDSKS2 patients demonstrated the involvement of major organs and systems, such as joints, spine, muscles, cardiovascular system, respiratory system, hearing, and vision, into the pathological process. Kidney mobility increases and nephroptosis seems to be secondary, caused by muscular weakness. During molecular genetic analysis, to verify EDSKS2 it is recommended to initially search for the c.362dupC duplication, which appears to be common in European countries, including Russia.
Many questions regarding the disorder's clinical polymorphism and progressive course remain unanswered. Some of them might be solved by a more detailed analysis of the FKBP14 gene functions. The obtained information would improve our understanding of the disorder's pathogenetic mechanisms and aid in target therapy development.
ClinVar: NM_017946.4(FKBP14):c.362dup (p.Glu122fs). Accession number VCV000279809.13; variation ID 279809; https://identifiers.org/clinvar:279809.
NCBI Nucleotide: Homo sapiens FKBP prolyl isomerase 14 (FKBP14), RefSeqGene (LRG_454) on chromosome 7. Accession number NG_032173.1; https://identifiers.org/ncbiprotein:NG_032173.1.
NCBI Nucleotide: Homo sapiens FKBP prolyl isomerase 14 (FKBP14), transcript variant 1, mRNA. Accession number NM_017946.4; https://identifiers.org/ncbiprotein:NM_017946.4.
4TU.ResearchData: Underlying data for: Ehlers-Danlos syndrome kyphoscoliotic type 2 caused by mutations in the FKBP14 gene: an analysis of five cases. https://doi.org/10.4121/14705859.v1.6
This project contains the following underlying data:
• Picture file 1. Gel of PCR fragments from patient no. 3. FKBP14 gene, exons 1–4.
• Picture file 2. Electropherogram of the exon 3 of the FKBP14 gene. A homozygous c.362dupC pathogenic variant in exon 3 of the FKBP14 gene.
• Data file 1. Readme.pdf.
Data are available under the terms of the Creative Commons Zero “No rights reserved” data waiver (CC0 1.0 Public domain dedication).
Views | Downloads | |
---|---|---|
F1000Research | - | - |
PubMed Central
Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.
|
- | - |
Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?
Yes
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?
Yes
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?
Yes
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?
Not applicable
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?
Yes
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?
Yes
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Reviewer Expertise: Clinical genetics
Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?
Yes
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?
Yes
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?
Yes
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?
Not applicable
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?
Yes
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?
Yes
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Reviewer Expertise: Neuromuscular disorders, Ehlers-Danlos-Syndrome
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Invited Reviewers | ||
---|---|---|
1 | 2 | |
Version 1 25 Jun 21 |
read | read |
Provide sufficient details of any financial or non-financial competing interests to enable users to assess whether your comments might lead a reasonable person to question your impartiality. Consider the following examples, but note that this is not an exhaustive list:
Sign up for content alerts and receive a weekly or monthly email with all newly published articles
Already registered? Sign in
The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.
You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.
You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.
If your email address is registered with us, we will email you instructions to reset your password.
If you think you should have received this email but it has not arrived, please check your spam filters and/or contact for further assistance.
Comments on this article Comments (0)