Home Browse Incorporating reading strategies for EFL undergraduate learners in...
ALL Metrics
-
Views
-
Downloads
Get PDF
Get XML
Cite
Export
Track
▬
✚
Research Article
Revised

Incorporating reading strategies for EFL undergraduate learners in Saudi Arabia: A think-aloud study

[version 2; peer review: 3 approved]
Arif Ahmed Mohammed Hassan Al-Ahdal
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6747-0897
1, Yasamiyan Alolaywi1
Arif Ahmed Mohammed Hassan Al-Ahdal
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6747-0897
1, Yasamiyan Alolaywi1
PUBLISHED 08 Nov 2022
Author details Author details
OPEN PEER REVIEW
REVIEWER STATUS

Abstract

Background: In language learning, reading is a skill that enables interaction with a text in whatever field of knowledge the learner is pursuing. Readers tend to use strategies such as comprehension, interpretation and conception of decoding written language and texts to enhance their reading capacity. This research explores the reading strategies applied by Saudi English as a Foreign Language (EFL) learners and compares the reading abilities of male and female EFL students. Methods: The study interviewed three EFL students about the reading strategies they applied while reading passages and texts. Then an International English Language Testing System (IELTS) reading test was handed over to 26 randomly selected students. Results: The study found that the reading strategies used by the students interviewed involved skimming, scanning, guessing the meaning from context, identifying the mean idea, and summarizing the body of the text in question. Moreover, the study revealed that both male and female students scored low in the IELTS tests that the researchers conducted. The average mean score they reached was 7.15 out of 20. However, even in the low scoring ratio, female students (M=7.69) outperformed male students (M= 6.62) and the difference between them remained significant, P=.000. Conclusions: The study recommends that the language instructors help EFL learners in developing their reading strategies and applying them every time they read any text.

Keywords

EFL Learners, Reading Strategies, Hearing Abilities, Language Instructors

Corresponding author: Arif Ahmed Mohammed Hassan Al-Ahdal
Competing interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Grant information: The author(s) declared that no grants were involved in supporting this work.
Copyright:  © 2022 Al-Ahdal AAMH and Alolaywi Y. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
How to cite: Al-Ahdal AAMH and Alolaywi Y. Incorporating reading strategies for EFL undergraduate learners in Saudi Arabia: A think-aloud study [version 2; peer review: 3 approved]. F1000Research 2022, 11:1070 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.123094.2) First published: 20 Sep 2022, 11:1070 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.123094.1) Latest published: 08 Nov 2022, 11:1070 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.123094.2)

Revised Amendments from Version 1

The updated text involves the following changes:

  • Authors' affiliations were updated, and Zip codes were added.
  • Abbreviations in the abstract section were spelled out.
  • A reference concerning the IELTS reading test was provided.
  • More details about the process of participants'' recruitment were provided in the "participants' section".
  • Keywords are arranged alphabetically, and the term "think-aloud" was inserted.
  • More description was provided about the methods of data processing and analysis including what tools/software were used to process the data.
  • The "reading strategies" section in the literature review was subdivided into "reading comprehension studies" and "think-aloud studies".
  • Quotes taken from the students' transcripts were inserted in parentheses.
  • All reviewers' corrections were checked to ensure that the original meanings were retained.
  • Inferential statistics were added to test the second research question and to test data normality.
  • All the respected reviewers' comments were fully addressed

To read any peer review reports and author responses for this article, follow the "read" links in the Open Peer Review table.

Introduction

While talking and hearing abilities are gained from infancy or through time, reading is actually a learned skill that can be strengthened. Since reading involves intellectual functions like encoding additional knowledge, using cognitive skills, engaging a layout for current understanding; it is different from literacy. The skills used in literacy, on the other hand, invite various strategies and metacognitive and cognitive approaches that define learners' awareness of which method works best for them and then selecting them. Substantial research and triarchic theory of intelligence by Sternberg points out that students with high achievement rates seem to be more metacognitive than students with lower achievement rates (Sternberg, 1985). Although simply having that metacognitive skill is not enough; factors such as motivation, persistence, focus and self-reliance play an important role for a successful path to learning.

Language researchers have shown a keen interest in the ‘think-aloud’ (expressing the thoughts as they occur) technique as a reading strategy (Lee et al., 2019; Li & Clariana, 2019; Ozek & Civelek, 2006; Reiber et al., 2021; Wei, 2020). However, even with the many investigations performed, several issues remain foggy. A number of previous studies explored ‘think-aloud’ as a teaching method (e.g., Kucan & Beck, 1997; Oster, 2001); other studies considered ‘think-aloud’ as a cognitive process (e.g., Davey, 1983). Think-aloud was also explored with both more and less successful learners. However, no previous study as per the researchers' knowledge explored the reading strategies which may be applied alongside the think-aloud strategy, nor has any previous study performed the application of think-aloud as per genders has been performed.

Think-aloud provides ample data for further research into cognitive processes and this study used the same technique with the undergraduate EFL learners in the classrooms of Saudi Universities. Despite the studies that have been conducted previously, there are limited studies that identify the reading levels of the Saudi EFL learners and their IELTS performance levels. Also, there has been no investigation of the reading strategies used by EFL learners and how they impact them across gender divides. This paper attempts to explain how the undergraduate male and female participants approach the reading strategies. It also denotes how a ‘think-aloud’ approach can be viewed through a qualitative as well as quantitative lens where the participants are more like quasi-researchers who voice the words in their heads while trying to complete the assigned tasks.

Literature review

Reading strategies have been discussed widely in previous research (Li, 2020). Reading strategies play a major role in helping students to understand texts (Suraprajit, 2019; Al-Ahdal, 2020). However, tertiary level students were found to have decisive problems in reading academic texts because of their use of ineffective reading techniques (Al-Mekhlafi, 2018). Kuhn (2000) defines metacognition as what enhances metacognitive awareness of what one thinks and how one recognizes and maintains a strategic control while applying these strategies to process new information. Some of these strategies have been used over a period of time by the students to help them in comprehension. It has been suggested that ‘think-aloud’ (expressing the thoughts as they occur) is a particularly effective strategy for readers who struggle while reading an unfamiliar text (Olshavsky, 1997).

The studies of reading strategies spread over many dimensions (Al-Mekhlafi, 2018; Bagci & Unveren, 2020; Deliany & Cahyono, 2020; Deliany & Cahyono, 2020; Suraprajit, 2019; Wahyono, 2019; Al-Ahdal & Al-Awaid, 2014). Wahyono (2019) explored the correlations between reading strategies and reading comprehension while Deliany and Cahyono (2020) investigated EFL students’ use of metacognitive reading strategies. Similarly, Suraprajit (2019) detected the use of bottom-up and top-down reading strategies in reading academic business language. Al-Mekhlafi (2018) also investigated the EFL learners' frequent use of reading strategies. Reading approaches, as according to Fandiño et al., (2019), may be divided into three categories: global schemes, dilemma (e.g., rereading), and supporting reading skills (e.g., taking notes).

Reading strategies

Reading strategies have been the focus of many previous studies (Al-Mekhlafi, 2018; Bagci & Unveren, 2020; Deliany & Cahyono, 2020; Deliany & Cahyono, 2020; Suraprajit, 2019; Wahyono, 2019; Al-Ahdal & Almarshedi, 2022). For example, Deliany and Cahyono (2020) studied EFL students’ implementation of metacognitive reading tactics and reported that most students had high metacognitive reading strategies. Also, the study found that there was no significant difference between the male learners and the female learners in the use of reading techniques. Furthermore, Suraprajit (2019) examined the use of bottom-up and top-down reading strategies in academic business language in a study that used a questionnaire to collect data from Thai students. The study reported that the top-down strategy was the most commonly used method of instruction. It focused on activities that constructed meaning by utilizing background knowledge, making predictions and searching the reading material to assert or discard the predictions that were made. In contrast, the bottom-up strategy focuses on the text which is read and analyzed from the start to finish. Students did not want to use their time reading aloud, identifying tenses or dividing the sentences into small elements. This was the least preferred method of instruction.

Moreover, Al-Mekhlafi (2018) investigated strategies commonly used by the EFL learners. The study found that students used different reading strategies extensively and there was no significant difference between the levels of students in the use of reading techniques. Similarly, Nazurty et al. (2019) studied how frequently the Indonesian student teachers use reading strategies. The study investigated the use of reading strategies at three levels: pre-reading, reading, and post-reading. The findings showed that cognitive reading strategies were used by EFL students in all the three different phases of reading. Furthermore, the study reported the tendency of female students to use cognitive strategies while male students used metacognitive strategies. Additionally, Wahyono (2019) explored students’ perceptions on reading strategies and their scores in reading comprehension in studies that indicate the correlation between reading strategies and comprehension of students. Findings of the study showed that the four cognitive pre-reading strategies including preview, prediction, prior knowledge, and purpose were used by all the students. In addition to those, many students used cognitive reading strategies such as rehearsal, developing new language, summarization, guessing meaning from context, and employing imagery for memorization. Furthermore, the study reported the correlation between reading strategies and reading comprehension with a coefficient of 0.61. Think-Aloud Protocols (TAPs) provide valuable information about how learners solve problems, what obstacles they face, how and in what contexts they use these strategies in their learning tasks (Someren et al., 1994).

Reading comprehension strategies

Much research has been undertaken in the journals on various elements of strategy usage and metacognitive strategies in reading (Dąbrowska, 2018; Li & Clariana, 2019; Zhang et al., 2019; Guo et al., 2018) by emphasizing the significance of instructional tactics in literature classrooms (Ferrara & Panlilio, 2020). Ample research concentrating on the effects of instructional techniques on students’ reading skills show that activities have a favorable impact on the EFL learners (Altiok et al., 2019; Jin et al., 2020). Biological sex and competency variations on techniques usage have also been identified in related studies (e.g., Dąbrowska, 2018; Guo et al., 2018; Li & Clariana, 2019; Jansen et al., 2019). Variability between good readers and those who have difficulty, according to Dąbrowska (2018), are influential determinants in the adoption of effective learning strategies. Furthermore, Jansen et al. (2019) performed a survey in a scenario where a lack of competence in the goal of linguistic knowledge (English) was asserted, and the investigator found that competency was indeed a determinant in adopting techniques for learning. Likewise, research conducted by Guo et al. (2018) studied how Chinese EFL students observe self-regulatory strategies in reading. Results showed that fluency was a predictor among the EFL students who incorporated several methods in their reading approach. Garner’s (1990) theory of settings proposes that strategies need to be changed according to the context. The classroom instructions do not always support the strategy used and the learners fall back on their old routine practices instead of adapting to the new methods.

Think-aloud methods as reading techniques

The think-aloud strategy for reading has been adapted by several researchers (Bai, 2018; Camilo et al., 2020; Follmer & Sperling, 2018; Huang, 2019; Lan, 2020; Li & Clariana, 2019; Reiber-Kuijpers et al., 2021; Wei, 2020). They employed think-aloud procedures in their studies for the process of recognizing metacognitive strategies. Li and Clariana (2019) conducted think-aloud research with 26 students of various levels of proficiency and they found that proficiency was beneficial in the application of several techniques. Along the same lines, Reiber-Kuijpers et al. (2021) employed think-aloud techniques to compare the strategies that both the successful readers and the less advanced readers used while reading and found that successful readers used many more tactics. Similarly, utilizing think-aloud protocols, Lee et al. (2019) determined several learning techniques in the outcomes of a study including 80 learners. The study revealed that developing literacy strategy and teaching reading skills should be tackled in a comparable research area. Tinzmann et al. (1990) ascertain that even training students to the thinking aloud habit keeps the classroom interactions robust. Ozek and Civelek (2006) consider the think-aloud strategy as an effective assessment tool to explore students’ reading strengths and weaknesses as it gives an insight to the reader’s mind which is otherwise unobservable (Block, 1986). Gunning (1996) asserts that think-aloud can be used to comprehend features such as seeking information using prior knowledge, visualizing texts, observing and solving word or comprehension related problems. The role of reflection and guidance from the teacher cannot be ruled out, if the teacher needs the reading strategy to work and for that they need to provide an environment where the student can think while they are reading (Chamot and O’Malley, 1994, p.11 cited by Lavadenz, 2003; Farr & Conner, 2004).

Research questions

Using the Think-aloud-protocol pattern, this study aims to answer the following questions:

  • • What reading strategies do Saudi EFL students employ when answering reading questions?

  • • Are there any significant differences in the level of reading ability between the Saudi male students and the female students?

Methods

Study design

A mixed-method research approach was utilized in the study as data were analyzed both quantitatively and qualitatively. A reading test was used to assess students' ability and applicability of the reading strategies. This is quantitatively assessed. Furthermore, the qualitative data were collected by interviewing four students during the reading session. The data collected through the two instruments were mixed in answering the research questions to triangulate and validate the findings. This study employed a think-aloud protocol design to gather verbal data on cognitive and metacognitive reading strategies used by undergraduate students enrolled in the EFL department in Qassim University for the academic year (1443AH). This is an explanatory design relying on the verbal protocols of the participants. Data analysis aimed to explore both cognitive and metacognitive reading strategy types that the participants used while engaged in a reading task.

Study population

The study sample consisted of 26 EFL students selected from the Department of English and Translation, College of Sciences and Arts, Methnab, Qassim University that were divided equally by gender (13 males and 13 females). All the students were native speakers of Arabic majoring in English. The ages of the participants ranged from 20 to 22 years. These students were randomly assigned to the study from a group of students who were enrolled in a Reading and Vocabulary Building Course. The selection of participants was based on the criteria of using the odd numbers from the list of students. Afterwards, three students (two males, and two females) were purposefully selected based on their proficiency levels to participate in the reading thinking-aloud task and to answer the interview questions. Table 1 below shows some demographic data about the study sample:

Table 1. Learners' demographic characteristics.

Number of Participants26
Age Range20-22
SpecializationEnglish Language & Translation
LevelJunior (Sophomores)
Gender13 Males & 13 Females

Data collection

Instruments

Reading test

A reading test was administered to the participating EFL students to measure their reading abilities and to engage them in think-aloud sessions. The reading was selected from an already valid and reliable IELTS reading test taken from (Hayes & Read, 2004). IELTS testing is an international standardized testing of English language proficiency for non-native English language speakers with an established worldwide credibility to assess language fluency. The test consists of a reading passage from a general topic and a set of twenty questions where each question is worth one point (Appendix A). The questions have different formats involving multiple-choice questions, matching, and summarizing the text.

Interviews

The four purposefully selected students underwent a semi-structured interview session in order to explore their perceptions and prior knowledge of reading strategies. The interviews were a part of the think-aloud sessions which were conducted with an effort to gain more in-depth information about the respondents' reading habits. The interview questions were adapted from Ghavamin et al. (2013) (see Appendix B). The interview focused on the learning and reading strategies that the learners used while reading a text and the steps they take to improve upon their reading abilities.

Think-aloud sessions

Procedure

Initially, twenty-six undergraduate students majoring in English were assigned to the current study (13 males and 13 females). The students were required to complete a reading comprehension test during a Reading and Vocabulary Building class in one hour. Afterwards, three participants were purposefully selected to take part in a think-aloud session to verbalize all the thoughts and processes going on in their minds while they were taking the test. As stated above, the interview questions were adapted from Ghavamin et al. (2013). This means that the questions were already valid and reliable in the original study. Furthermore, the researchers administrated them on two students who were excluded from the study. The students reported the clarity and understandability of the interview questions. The researchers recruited them based on their previous verbal consent to participate in the study.

Every week, the instructor explained to the students a new reading strategy (e.g., scanning, skimming, previewing, guessing the unknown word, etc.) Students in each think-aloud session were required to apply the studied reading strategies to the target reading texts. They were also asked to report what they had comprehended from the text aloud. This procedure continued for the whole semester and at the end of the semester, the impact of the think-aloud strategy was assessed through a reading test. Students also reported their knowledge about the strategies they mastered and applied through an interview.

The think-aloud protocols were then recorded using a mobile phone and their responses transcribed by the researchers later. The interview was held in the English Department with four students. It took 15 minutes for each student to answer the five interview questions. As stated earlier, the interview was held in English language, and when there was a language barrier, Arabic was used. Furthermore, the answers were transcribed, cleaned and themed. They appear in the results section along with the students' number, i.e. (student 1-4). Then, the data were decoded and classified into categories based on the reading strategies adopted by these sampled students. The types of reading strategies adopted by the EFL learners while performing the reading task were identified and examined. The researchers also analyzed the extent to which gender differences played a role in learners' comprehension and utilization of the reading strategies learned over a course of time.

Ethics statement

Ethical approval was obtained from the Scientific and Ethical Committee of Qassim University on (29/3/2022). Informed verbal consent was obtained from participants for the use and publication of their data.

Data analysis

Data for this research were gathered during the second semester of the academic year 2021-2022. Data were analyzed both quantitatively and qualitatively. The raw scores obtained from the reading tests were coded and calculated using statistical tool SPSS or Statistical Package for the Social Sciences, (Version 26) used for complex statistical data analysis. Descriptive statistics were reported involving minimum and maximum scores, frequencies, mean scores along with the standard deviation. Moreover, inferential analysis was performed to answer the second research question which compared if there is a difference between the male and female application to reading strategies. Therefore, the One-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test was obtained to check the normality of distribution. Furthermore, Mann-Whitney U test was also performed to calculate the difference in the male and female reading comprehension abilities. Data gathered from the semi-structured interviews during the think-aloud sessions were analyzed qualitatively. This was done manually by applying the following steps. The students' answers were anonymously presented by using the word ‘Student’ to maintain the privacy of those participants. As soon as the data were transcribed, they were cleaned; a close examination of the students’ transcripts was required to identify appropriate themes and classifications. Each student's responses were divided into five parts to answer the five interview questions. In this study, the analysis was conducted at sentence level. This means that every student's interview was semi-opened so, they were transcribed into short sentences focusing on the reading strategies they pertained (see the quotations of students 1 to 4). Wherever appropriate, quotes from the students’ responses were also used to back up and support the themes identified in the tests.

Results

Research Question 1. What reading strategies do Saudi ESL students employ when answering reading questions? This question is answered through analyzing the students' responses at the interview stage of the study. Students used various reading strategies depending on the types of reading questions they answered. They reported to use the following reading strategies: reading for overall understanding, scanning & guessing the meaning, identifying the part of speech of certain vocabulary, and summarizing. Their answers were: “In the beginning, I read mainly to get the gist of the text. For further reading, I scan the text and try to guess the meaning from the body of the text. It helps me identify the part of speech being used in the text and I'm able to guess the meaning from the context of the passage. Using this information, I summarize the main idea that emerged from the text,” (Student 1 reported). Similar strategies were also reported by the previous student: “I use all three types of strategies: skimming, scanning and guessing the meaning of the text from the context of the passage,” (Student 2). Furthermore, the same focus was mentioned by another student: “I use guessing contextual meaning from the text drawing inferences, identifying part of speech and comprehending what the writer intends to say,” (Student 3). Still, Student 4 added, “I gist the meaning of the passage, make inferences and summarize the main ideas of the passage”.

RQ2. Are there any significant differences in the level of reading ability among Saudi male and female students? The second research question will be answered using the students' responses to the IELTS test. Before comparing whether there is a difference between male and female students affecting the reading ability, a test for checking the normality of distribution was performed. Table 2 shows that the students' scores were not normally distributed. The Asymp test showed that the score is (Sig.=.003) which indicates that there is a significant difference in the distribution of students' scores.

Table 2. One-Sample Komogorov-Smimov test.

Score
N26
Normal ParametersaMean7.1538
Std. Deviation3.19615
Most Extreme DifferencesAbsolute.218
Positive.218
Negative-.123
Test Statistic.218
Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed).003b

a Test distribution is Normal.

b Lilliefors Significance Correction.

According to Table 3, the average mean score of the students was 7.15 and the standard deviation was 3.173. Male students’ mean score in the reading test was (M=6.62) with a standard deviation of (Std=2.663) whereas the mean score of female students was (M=7.69) and standard deviation of (Std=3.683) in the reading test. Female students outperformed male students in the reading competence and the difference in their scores was significant. The Sig-value is .534 which is greater than .05. We found there was no significant difference in reading ability between the male and female students in the study. However, female students used reading strategies slightly better than their male counterparts during the reading tasks. They applied reading strategies, i.e., skimming, scanning, guessing the meaning of unfamiliar words using the context, etc. more frequently and effectively.

Table 3. Mann-Whitney U-test of male and female students' results in the reading test.

Asymp
SexMeanStd. DeviationTdfSig.(2-tailed)
Male6.622.6637.53112.534
Female7.693.6838.958
Average7.153.173

Discussion

The present research intends to investigate the reading strategies used by EFL students in order to get insight into their cognitive abilities. The study reported that students used various reading strategies depending on the reading questions. Some of the strategies were: reading to get an understanding of the main point of the text, skimming, scanning, guessing the meaning from the context, identifying the central idea and summarizing it. Students' use of such reading strategies enabled them to comprehend various types of texts which developed their cognitive abilities used for language learning and acquisition. Many studies found that EFL learners used reading strategies to comprehend the academic reading texts as well. The study proved that the students employed cognitive and meta cognitive reading techniques while reading and that they preferred a top-down approach to a bottom-up approach. Michael Yeldham (2004) cites Vandergrift in his study of top-down and bottom-up approach who agrees that strategy instruction needs to be predominantly top-down, because then the learners become more aware using the information they already have to fill gaps in their understanding (Vandergrift, 2004).

The students used reading techniques extensively and their level of learning didn’t factor highly into using these strategies. While the study of the Indonesian student teacher reading programs showed that the EFL learners used different learning strategies during pre-reading and post-reading periods, their reading abilities improved with the wide variety of learning strategies used over a period of time. The study by Nguyen and Terry (2017) of Vietnamese EFL learners and staff found that the English learning success was attributed to multiple elements and not any single factor therefore the use of strategies and teachers’ flexibility in adapting the strategy to the needs of their students go hand in hand.

The students did not fare so well in the IELTS reading test with a mean score of 7.15 out of 20. Male students scored (6.62) lower than female students (7.69) and the difference between them is significant. In this, the finding differed from Deliany and Cahyono (2020), who reported that there was no difference between male and female EFL students using metacognitive reading strategies. This finding may co-relate the findings of Nazurty et al. (2019) who reported that while the female students used more cognitive strategies, the male students used metacognitive strategies. In a study to train the students’ metacognitive skills based on gender differences, Nunaki et al. (2019) developed a 4-D research model to test both male and female students of a senior high school in Indonesia. The study supports the findings that there are no differences in the metacognitive skills used by the male or female students in inquiry-based learning.

Conclusions

The global scheme, rereading and supporting reading skills methods serve a variety of functions, but they all stem from complicated cognitive processes. In this research, scanning techniques, questionnaire/interviewing and testing of the participants were used. These studies used think-aloud protocols to assess EFL's students’ metacognition and usage of worldwide reading skills while taking into account regularly used approaches in developing language studies. The study also suggests that students need to be trained to develop their metacognitive skills and that strategies alone do not result in successful outcomes. With the combined efforts of language instructors, curriculum design experts and motivated students, a successful implementation of strategies and effective learning can take place. As a result, the impact of instructional strategies could be demonstrated in aiding the reading abilities of the students. The study seeks to assess how EFL students approach and utilize think-aloud protocols in light of the relevant research and earlier investigations. Think-aloud is both a method of inquiry and a flexible mode of goal-oriented instruction. The success of its implementation depends on how well it can be used in classroom teaching. Some well-rehearsed exchanges between the teacher and the students are required to judge the competence levels of their EFL learners. Thus, incorporated into instructional approaches in schools in Saudi Arabia, think-aloud can lead to a constructive and engaging classroom environment that facilitates textual comprehension as well as social interaction.

Recommendations for further studies on reading strategies in the Saudi context:

  • • EFL instructors need to give a combination of prompts that are relatable and culturally familiar.

  • • Instructors need to refrain from giving any feedback during the reading process even if students mispronounce or misread certain words. Only when the student has read their piece should the researchers interfere.

  • • The instructors can introduce simple warm-up exercises before they begin using the think aloud technique to make the task easier for the learners.

  • • Switching back and forth from the native language to the foreign language might complicate the learning process and confuse the EFL learners so the instructor needs to ensure that only the target language is used in the process.

  • • Non-verbal cues such as body language and gestures and paralinguistic features such as tone of the voice and rhythm of the speech along with verbal expressions play an important role in learning a foreign language and instructors need to take note of that and include it in their data collection.

  • • Pairing up students can be an interesting feature of further studies where one student reads and the other one listens and takes notes and vice versa.

  • • Instructors are advised to extend the activities to other features of language learning such as short story building, storytelling and poetry reading activities in groups.

  • • Instructors need to provide a follow-up to their study so that the students recognize their efforts and work on their limitations.

  • • Instructors’ consistent use of learning strategies for academic purposes will motivate language learners to follow suit.

  • • Instructors can model the activity by ‘role-playing’ or practicing the strategy with the learners before they incorporate it into their lesson plans.

  • • Further research exploring the gender differences based on age, grade-level and competency level can provide new insight on the success of cognitive-led studies.

Limitations

  • • The study did not investigate the metacognitive reading techniques that can be further used in similar studies.

  • • If prompts are too complicated and require interpretation, they can be counter-productive to the learning intended for the participant.

  • • While the participant is trying to read by thinking aloud, questions should not be asked during the process as it may break their rhythm of thought process.

  • • Time restrictions may shorten the scope of the activity planned.

  • • Verbalization alone may not be an effective approach.

  • • Breaking into native language patterns might impede the progress made during the learning activity.

Data availability

Underlying data

Figshare: Incorporating reading strategies for EFL undergraduate learners in Saudi Arabia: A think-aloud study. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.20280405.v1.

This project contains the following underlying data:

  • • Raw Scores

  • • 8th July 2022.xlsx Transcriptions of The Students Responses

  • • 8th July 2022.docx

Extended data

This project contains the following extended data:

  • - Interview Questions.docx

  • - Reading Test.docx

Data are available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (CC-BY 4.0).

References

  •  Al-Ahdal AAMH: EBook interaction logs as a tool in predicting learner performance in reading. Asiatic: IIUM. J. Engl. Lang. Lit. 2020; 14(1): 174–188.Reference Source
  •  Al-Ahdal A, Alolaywi Y: Incorporating reading strategies for EFL undergraduate learners in Saudi Arabia: A think-aloud study. figshare. [Dataset]. Journal Contribution. 2022. Publisher Full Text
  •  Al-Ahdal AAMH, Almarshedi RM: Metalinguistic awareness and academic achievement: Finding correlations among high-achieving EFL learners. J. Lang. Linguist. Stud. 2022; 18(Special Issue 1): 472–483.
  •  Al-Ahdal AAMH, Al-Awaid SAA: Reflective teaching and language teacher education programmes: A milestone in Yemen and Saudi Arabia. J. Lang. Teach. Res. 2014; 5(4): 759–768. Publisher Full Text
  •  Al-Mekhlafi AM: EFL Learners’ Metacognitive Awareness of Reading Strategies. Int. J. Instr. 2018; 11(2): 297–308. Publisher Full Text
  •  Altıok S, Başer Z, Yükseltürk E: Enhancing metacognitive awareness of undergraduates through using an e-educational video environment. Comput. Educ. 2019; 139: 129–145. Publisher Full Text
  •  Bagci H, Unveren D: Investigation of the Relationship between Metacognitive Awareness of Reading Strategies and Self-Efficacy Perception in Reading Comprehension in Mother-Tongue: Sample of 8th Graders. International Journal of Educational Methodology. 2020; 6(1): 83–98.
  •  Bai B: Understanding primary school students’ use of self-regulated writing strategies through think-aloud protocols. System. 2018; 78: 15–26. Publisher Full Text
  •  Block E: The comprehension strategies of second language readers. TESOL Q. 1986; 20: 463–494. Publisher Full Text
  •  Boulware-Gooden R, Carreker S, Thornhill A, Joshi RM:2007.
  •  Brown JD, Rogers TS:Introspection research: verbal protocols. Doing second language research. New York:Oxford University Press;2004; (pp. 53–78).
  •  Camilo C, Garrido MV, Calheiros MM: The social information processing model in child physical abuse and neglect: A meta-analytic review. Child Abuse Negl. 2020; 108: 104666. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
  •  Chamot AU, O'malley JM: The CALLA handbook: Implementing the cognitive academic language learning approach. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company;1994.
  •  Dąbrowska E: Experience, aptitude and individual differences in native language ultimate attainment. Cognition. 2018; 178: 222–235. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
  •  Davey B: Think aloud: Modeling the cognitive processes of reading comprehension. J. Read. 1983; 27(1): 44–47.
  •  Deliany Z, Cahyono BY: Metacognitive reading strategies awareness and metacognitive reading strategies use of EFL university students across gender. Stud. Engl. Lang. Educ. 2020; 7(2): 421–437. Publisher Full Text
  •  Ericsson KA, Simon HA: Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data. (Rev. ed.).Cambridge, MA:MIT Press;1993.
  •  Fandiño FGE, Muñoz LD, Velandia AJS: Motivation and E-Learning English as a foreign language: A qualitative study. Heliyon. 2019; 5(9): e02394. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
  •  Farr R, Conner J: Using think-alouds to improve reading comprehension. Repéré à : http://www.readingrockets.org/article/102.2004.
  •  Ferrara AM, Panlilio CC: The role of metacognition in explaining the relationship between early adversity and reading comprehension. Child Youth Serv. Rev. 2020; 112: 104884. Publisher Full Text
  •  Follmer DJ, Sperling RA: Interactions between reader and text: Contributions of cognitive processes, strategy use, and text cohesion to comprehension of expository science text. Learn. Individ. Differ. 2018; 67: 177–187. Publisher Full Text
  •  Garner R: When children and adults do not use learning strategies: Toward a theory of settings. Rev. Educ. Res. 1990; 60(4): 517–529. Publisher Full Text
  •  Ghavamin M, Ketabi S, Tavakoli M: L2 reading strategies used by Iranian EFL learners: A think-aloud study. Read. Psychol. 2013; 34(4): 355–378. Publisher Full Text
  •  Gunning TG: Creating reading instruction for all children.Allyn and Bacon, Order Processing, PO Box 11071, Des Moines, IA 50336-1071;1996.
  •  Guo Y, Xu J, Liu X: English language learners’ use of self-regulatory strategies for foreign language anxiety in China. System. 2018; 76: 49–61. Publisher Full Text
  •  Hayes B, Read J:IELTS Test Preparation in New Zealand: Preparing Students for the IELTS Academic Module.Cheng L, Watanabe Y, editors. Washback in Language Testing. Resource Contexts and Methods. New Jersey:Lawrence Erlbaum;2004; (pp 97–111).
  •  Huang TC: Do different learning styles make a difference when it comes to creativity? An empirical study. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2019; 100: 252–257. Publisher Full Text
  •  Jansen RS, Van Leeuwen A, Janssen J, et al.: Self-regulated learning partially mediates the effect of self-regulated learning interventions on achievement in higher education: A meta-analysis. Educ. Res. Rev. 2019; 28: 100292. Publisher Full Text
  •  Jin T, Liu X, Lei J: Developing an effective three-stage teaching method for collaborative academic reading: evidence from Chinese first-year college students. J. Engl. Acad. Purp. 2020; 45: 100853. Publisher Full Text
  •  Kucan L, Beck IL: Thinking aloud and reading comprehension research: Inquiry, instruction, and social interaction. Rev. Educ. Res. 1997; 67(3): 271–299. Publisher Full Text
  •  Kuhn D: Theory of mind, metacognition and reasoning: A lifespan perspective.2000.
  •  Lan YJ: Immersion into virtual reality for language learning. Psychol. Learn. Motiv. 2020; 72: 1–26. Publisher Full Text
  •  Lavadenz M: Think aloud protocols: Teaching reading processes to young bilingual students.Eric. Digest.2003; 3(14). https://digitalcommons.lmu.edu/education_fac
  •  Lavi R, Tal M, Dori YJ: Perceptions of STEM alumni and students on developing 21st century skills through methods of teaching and learning. Stud. Educ. Eval. 2021; 70: 101002. Publisher Full Text
  •  Lee J, Knowles Z, Whitehead AE: Exploring the use of think aloud within Women’s artistic gymnastics judging education. Psychol. Sport Exerc. 2019; 40: 135–142. Publisher Full Text
  •  Li J: Development and validation of second language online reading strategies inventory. Comput. Educ. 2020; 145: 103733. Publisher Full Text
  •  Li P, Clariana RB: Reading comprehension in L1 and L2: An integrative approach. J. Neurolinguistics. 2019; 50: 94–105. Publisher Full Text
  •  Nazurty R, Priyanto N, AnggiaPratiwi S, et al.: Learning Strategies in Reading: The Case of Indonesian Language Education Student Teachers. Univ. J. Educ. Res. 2019; 7(11): 2536–2543. Publisher Full Text
  •  Nguyen H, Terry RD: English Learning Strategies among EFL Learners: A Narrative Approach.2017.
  •  Nunaki J, Damopolli I, Kandowangko N, et al.: The effectiveness of inquiry-based learning to train the students' metacognitive skills based on gender differences.2019. http://repository.unipa.ac.id:8080/xmlui/bitstream/handle/123456789/346/artikel.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
  •  Olshavsky JE: Reading as a problem-solving: An investigation of strategies. Read. Res. Q. 1997; 12: 654–674. Publisher Full Text
  •  Oster L: Using the think-aloud for reading instruction. Read. Teach. 2001; 55(1): 64–69.
  •  Ozek Y, Civelek M: A Study on the use of cognitive reading strategies by ELT students. Asian EFL J. 2006 August; 14.Reference Source
  •  Pressley M, Wharton-McDonald R, Mistretta-Hampston J, et al.: Literacy Instruction in 10 Fourth-Grade Classrooms in Upstate New York. Sci. Stud. Read. 1998; 2(2): 159–194. Publisher Full Text
  •  Reiber-Kuijpers M, Kral M, Meijer P: Digital reading in a second or foreign language: A systematic literature review. Comput. Educ. 2021; 163: 104115. Publisher Full Text
  •  Tinzmann MB, Jones BF, Fennimore TF, et al.: New learning and thinking curricula require collaboration. In What is the collaborative classroom ? NCREL;1990.
  •  Van Someren M, Barnard YF, Sandberg J: The think aloud method: a practical approach to modelling cognitive .London:Academic Press;1994.
  •  Sternberg RJ: Implicit theories of intelligence, creativity and wisdom. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 1985; 49(3): 607–627. Publisher Full Text
  •  Suraprajit P: Bottom-up vs top-down model: The perception of reading strategies among Thai university students. J. Lang. Teach. Res. 2019; 10(3): 454–460. Publisher Full Text
  •  Vandergrift L: 1. Listening to learn or learning to listen? Annu. Rev. Appl. Linguist. 2004; 24: 3–25. Publisher Full Text
  •  Wahyono E: Correlation between Students’ Cognitive Reading Strategies and Reading Comprehension. JurnalStudi Guru Dan Pembelajaran. 2019; 2(3): 256–263. Publisher Full Text
  •  Wei X: Assessing the metacognitive awareness relevant to L1-to-L2 rhetorical transfer in L2 writing: The cases of Chinese EFL writers across proficiency levels. Assess. Writ. 2020; 44: 100452. Publisher Full Text
  •  Yilmaz FGK, Yilmaz R: Impact of pedagogic agent-mediated metacognitive support towards increasing task and group awareness in CSCL. Comput. Educ. 2019; 134: 1–14. Publisher Full Text
  •  Zhang LJ, Thomas N, Qin TL: Language learning strategy research in System: Looking back and looking forward. System. 2019; 84: 87–92. Publisher Full Text

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 2
VERSION 2 PUBLISHED 20 Sep 2022
Comment
Author details Author details
Competing interests
Grant information
Article Versions (2)
Copyright
Download
 
Export To
metrics
Views Downloads
F1000Research - -
PubMed Central
Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.
 - -
Citations
SEE MORE DETAILS
CITE
how to cite this article
Al-Ahdal AAMH and Alolaywi Y. Incorporating reading strategies for EFL undergraduate learners in Saudi Arabia: A think-aloud study [version 2; peer review: 3 approved]. F1000Research 2022, 11:1070 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.123094.2)
NOTE: If applicable, it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
track
receive updates on this article
Track an article to receive email alerts on any updates to this article.

Open Peer Review

Current Reviewer Status: ?
Key to Reviewer Statuses VIEW
ApprovedThe paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approvedFundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions
Version 2
VERSION 2
PUBLISHED 08 Nov 2022
Revised
Views
17
Cite
Reviewer Report 10 Nov 2022
Asmara Shafqat, Department of English, Humanities, NED University of Engineering and Technology, Karachi, Pakistan 
Approved
VIEWS 17
https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.139269.r155233
The authors have addressed all the issues and revised the article as ... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
Shafqat A. Reviewer Report For: Incorporating reading strategies for EFL undergraduate learners in Saudi Arabia: A think-aloud study [version 2; peer review: 3 approved]. F1000Research 2022, 11:1070 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.139269.r155233)
The direct URL for this report is:
https://f1000research.com/articles/11-1070/v2#referee-response-155233
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
Report a concern
Views
13
Cite
Reviewer Report 09 Nov 2022
Ahdi Hassan, Global Institute for Research Education & Scholarship, Amsterdam, The Netherlands 
Approved
VIEWS 13
https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.139269.r155234
I have gone through the revised version of the article and I find it in a perfect shape. In its current form, it would be of great significance to the teachers and learners of English in an EFL setting. I ... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
Hassan A. Reviewer Report For: Incorporating reading strategies for EFL undergraduate learners in Saudi Arabia: A think-aloud study [version 2; peer review: 3 approved]. F1000Research 2022, 11:1070 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.139269.r155234)
The direct URL for this report is:
https://f1000research.com/articles/11-1070/v2#referee-response-155234
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
Report a concern
Views
11
Cite
Reviewer Report 09 Nov 2022
Gilbert C. Magulod jr, College of Teacher Education, Cagayan State University, Tuguegarao, Philippines 
Approved
VIEWS 11
https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.139269.r155232
The revised paper has an acceptable quality to be indexed and read by ... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
Magulod jr GC. Reviewer Report For: Incorporating reading strategies for EFL undergraduate learners in Saudi Arabia: A think-aloud study [version 2; peer review: 3 approved]. F1000Research 2022, 11:1070 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.139269.r155232)
The direct URL for this report is:
https://f1000research.com/articles/11-1070/v2#referee-response-155232
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
Report a concern
Version 1
VERSION 1
PUBLISHED 20 Sep 2022
Views
16
Cite
Reviewer Report 27 Sep 2022
Gilbert C. Magulod jr, College of Teacher Education, Cagayan State University, Tuguegarao, Philippines 
Approved with Reservations
VIEWS 16
https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.135163.r150896
The paper can contribute to the EFL undergraduate learners in Saudi Arabia. The study is a mixed methods research which is commendable. However, the following should be considered to revise the paper: 
  1. In the introduction, there
... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
Magulod jr GC. Reviewer Report For: Incorporating reading strategies for EFL undergraduate learners in Saudi Arabia: A think-aloud study [version 2; peer review: 3 approved]. F1000Research 2022, 11:1070 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.135163.r150896)
The direct URL for this report is:
https://f1000research.com/articles/11-1070/v1#referee-response-150896
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
Report a concern
Views
19
Cite
Reviewer Report 27 Sep 2022
Ahdi Hassan, Global Institute for Research Education & Scholarship, Amsterdam, The Netherlands 
Approved with Reservations
VIEWS 19
https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.135163.r150898
Incorporating reading strategies for EFL undergraduate learners in Saudi Arabia: A think-aloud study: Review Report
  1. The paper is well written and organized. It lays down the reading strategies as applied by Saudi EFL students along with
... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
Hassan A. Reviewer Report For: Incorporating reading strategies for EFL undergraduate learners in Saudi Arabia: A think-aloud study [version 2; peer review: 3 approved]. F1000Research 2022, 11:1070 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.135163.r150898)
The direct URL for this report is:
https://f1000research.com/articles/11-1070/v1#referee-response-150898
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
Report a concern
Views
26
Cite
Reviewer Report 26 Sep 2022
Asmara Shafqat, Department of English, Humanities, NED University of Engineering and Technology, Karachi, Pakistan 
Approved with Reservations
VIEWS 26
https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.135163.r150900
The manuscript,  " Incorporating reading strategies for EFL undergraduate learners in Saudi Arabia: A think-aloud study" is a wonderful work in Saudi Arabia context. The researcher tried to put all the convincing ideas in a systematic organization of the research pattern, ... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
Shafqat A. Reviewer Report For: Incorporating reading strategies for EFL undergraduate learners in Saudi Arabia: A think-aloud study [version 2; peer review: 3 approved]. F1000Research 2022, 11:1070 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.135163.r150900)
The direct URL for this report is:
https://f1000research.com/articles/11-1070/v1#referee-response-150900
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
Report a concern

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 2
VERSION 2 PUBLISHED 20 Sep 2022
Comment

Open Peer Review

Reviewer Status

Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:

Approved
The paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations
A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approved
Fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions

Reviewer Reports

Invited Reviewers
1 2 3
Version 2
(revision)
 08 Nov 22 		read read read
Version 1
20 Sep 22 		read read read
  1. Asmara Shafqat, NED University of Engineering and Technology, Karachi, Pakistan
  2. Ahdi Hassan, Global Institute for Research Education & Scholarship, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  3. Gilbert C. Magulod jr, Cagayan State University, Tuguegarao, Philippines

Comments on this article

All Comments(0)

Add a comment
Sign up for content alerts

Browse by related subjects

    keyboard_arrow_left Back to all reports
    keyboard_arrow_left Back to all reports
    keyboard_arrow_left Back to all reports
    keyboard_arrow_left Back to all reports
    keyboard_arrow_left Back to all reports
    keyboard_arrow_left Back to all reports
    Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
    Approved - the paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
    Approved with reservations - A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
    Not approved - fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions
    Sign In
    If you've forgotten your password, please enter your email address below and we'll send you instructions on how to reset your password.

    The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.
    Email address not valid, please try again

    You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.

    To sign in, please click here.

    If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.

    You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.

    To sign in, please click here.

    If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.

    Code not correct, please try again
    Email us for further assistance.
    Server error, please try again.