Keywords
rheumatoid arthritis, spondyloarthritis, leucine-rich alpha-2 glycoprotein
rheumatoid arthritis, spondyloarthritis, leucine-rich alpha-2 glycoprotein
Arthritis is an inflammatory process characterized by pain, swelling and stiffness of the joints. Chronic inflammation of the joints can lead to joint deformity and destruction of structures in proximity to the joints. Early identification of the etiologies of arthritis is pivotal to promote clinical improvement, prevent the development of structural and functional joint damage, and consequently preserve patient quality of life.1 Two of the major causes of arthritis are systemic autoimmune diseases, such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and spondyloarthritis (SpA).2,3
The prevalence of these two diseases is similar. The global prevalence of RA is 0.5–1%, while the exact prevalence of RA in Indonesia is unknown. However, based on a prevalence of 0.5–1% of the total population of Indonesia, it can be estimated that RA occurs in around 1.3 million Indonesians in 2020.4 Meanwhile, the prevalence of SpA is about 0.5–2% of the world population.5,6
The pathogenesis of RA and SpA is complex and distinct from one another. RA is an autoimmune disease characterized by the production of rheumatoid factor (RF) and anti-citrullinating protein antibody (ACPA).7,8 Patients with RA who are positive for RF, ACPA, or both, which represents approximately 75–85% of all patients with RA, are classified as seropositive RA. However, approximately 20% of patients with RA are negative for RF and/or ACPA and are consequently classified as seronegative RA.5 The absence of antibodies in SpA renders it difficult to distinguish from seronegative RA in some cases. SpA is a group of systemic rheumatic diseases characterized by chronic autoinflammation of the innate immune system and is associated with HLA-B27.6,7 SpA is further subdivided into psoriatic arthritis (PsA), ankylosing spondylitis (AS), reactive arthritis, arthritis associated with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and non-specific arthritis.9,10
In the early stages of the disease, some of the signs and symptoms of joint inflammation in RA may resemble that of SpA. This can lead to difficulty in pinpointing a diagnosis, which then affects the extent of joint damage. A cohort study by Combe et al., suggested that early diagnosis is the key to a good outcome in the management of arthritis.11 Despite this urgency, classification criteria and clinical diagnostic standards are often only useful one or two years after disease onset. Additionally, clinicians may not use them consistently and uniformly when classifying early-phase arthritis.11–13
The annual incidence of early inflammatory arthritis (EIA) ranges from 115 to 271 per 100,000 adults. The annual incidence of undifferentiated arthritis (UA) ranges from 41 to 149 per 100,000 adults. Around 13–54% of UA will progress to RA, whereas 21–87% of UA will persist. Several cohort studies report that early-phase arthritis patients who are referred to rheumatology for further assessment had to wait for 2 to 36 months to be reclassified to a more specific arthritis.14 These holdups can lead to delays in diagnosis and administration of therapy. Several studies have shown that patients with RA diagnosed in more than 12 weeks since the onset of symptoms eventually exhibited more severe joint destruction. Over a course of 10 years, 92% of patients showed decreased functional ability and about 50% required assistance in performing daily activities.15,16
Providing a correct diagnosis will positively impact the management of these patients as some medical therapies for RA may not be effective in SpA. For instance, the B cell targeting drug rituximab is considered effective in RA but has yet to be proven effective in SpA. By contrast, the administration of drugs targeting the interleukin (IL)-12/IL-23 and IL-17 pathways have proven beneficial in PsA, but not in RA.17,18
In some cases, RA and SpA may show clinical symptoms that are difficult to distinguish from one another. Therefore, an examination to assist the diagnosis of RA and SpA is warranted. One such examination is the measurement of leucine-rich alpha-2 glycoprotein (LRG) levels. LRG is a 50 kDa leucine-rich glycoprotein synthesized in hepatocytes, neutrophils, macrophages, and epithelial cells of inflamed tissues. LRG expression is mostly stimulated by IL-6 or IL-1 but could also be induced by IL-1β, IL-22, and NF-α. Increased pro-inflammatory cytokines, especially IL-6, has been shown to indirectly increase LRG.19–21
Studies assessing LRG levels in the synovial fluid of RA and SpA patients have previously been conducted, with varying results being obtained. Several studies examining LRG levels in synovial fluid, including one by Birkelund et al., reported that synovial fluid proteomics analysis from SpA and RA patients showed striking differences in the amount of innate immune system proteins, especially those from neutrophil granulocytes, including LRG. This protein was found to be more abundant in the RA patient group.22 Furthermore, there are also studies examining the utility of serum LRG levels in differentiating EIA. McArdle et al., analyzed serum protein biomarkers from RA and PsA patients using multiple reaction monitoring (MRM). LRG was recognized as one of the proteins that was able to distinguish RA from PsA, which was found to be significantly increased in RA relative to PsA. This increase in LRG is associated with a relatively higher level of IL-6 in RA compared to SpA, which in turn produced a greater increase in LRG expression.17 Nakajima et al., found that serum LRG levels were also elevated in patients with PsA compared to patients with psoriasis vulgaris.23
Currently, there are no existing studies comparing LRG values in RA and SpA patients using blood samples. Therefore, we analyzed serum LRG levels in patients with confirmed RA and SpA. The results of this study can hopefully be used as primary data to distinguish RA and SpA in cases where they are difficult to discern and aid in better understanding the role of LRG the diagnosis of RA and SpA.
This study has received approval from the Research Ethics Committee of Faculty of Medicine Universitas Indonesia and Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo National Central Public Hospital (KET-197/UN2.F1/ETIK/PPM.00.02/2022) on 28 February 2022. Written informed consent for their participation in the study and publication of the patients’ details was obtained from each of the patients. The patients were anonymized and identified through the medical record number.
This research was a cross-sectional study conducted at the Rheumatology Polyclinic of Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo National Central Public Hospital (RSCM) (Jakarta, Indonesia) from March to May of 2022. This study is reported in line with the STROBE guidelines.24 The research subjects were recruited by consecutive sampling. The inclusion criteria included: patients aged over 18 years old; confirmed seropositive active RA patients in accordance with the disease activity score-28 for RA (DAS28); active SpA patients in accordance with the classification criteria of each disease, namely AS disease activity score (ASDAS) for AS and peripheral SpA and disease activity index for PsA (DAPSA) for PsA; and (4) patients able to fill out the consent form and are willing to participate in the study. Patients with other systemic autoimmune diseases, acute infectious diseases, liver disorders, and malignancies were excluded from the study.
This study also divided the subjects to several subgroups. C-reactive protein (CRP) levels were measured and patients with elevated CRP, defined as greater than 5 mg/dL, were analyzed separately. The LRG levels of both RA and SpA patients were also analyzed separately based on their disease activity and disease onset. Naïve patients, defined as patients with no prior exposure to conventional or disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARD), were categorized as “new onset”. Meanwhile patients who have received DMARD were categorized as “old onset”. Appropriate criteria cut-off points were used according to the corresponding disease in determining disease activity. Determination of sample size can be found as Underlying data.24
Blood samples collected from patients were analyzed for LRG and CRP levels in an ISO-certified laboratory at Universitas Indonesia. To extract the serum, 6 mL of whole blood was drawn and centrifuged (Heraeus Labofuge 200, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham (MA), USA) at 3,000 rpm for 15 minutes and 2,000 rpm for 5 minutes for LRG and CRP, respectively. LRG measurement was performed with Human LRG ELISA Assay Kit (Immuno-Biological Laboratories Co., Ltd., Fujioka, Gunma, Japan) and read with spectrophotometry at 450 nm. Meanwhile, CRP measurement was performed with immunoturbidimetry using cobas c 311 analyzer (Roche Holding AG, Basel, Switzerland).
Statistical analyses of the collected data were processed using IBM SPSS Statistics (RRID:SCR_016479) 24.0 for Mac program (IBM Corp., Armonk (NY), USA). Comparison of LRG levels were analyzed using the parametric independent samples t-test or Mann-Whitney non-parametric test depending on the distribution of the data, which was determined via the Shapiro-Wilk test.
Ultimately, 26 patients with RA and 26 patients with SpA were included as research subjects, totaling at 52 patients. A flow diagram of subject inclusion can be found as Underlying data.24 Characteristics of the research subjects are shown in Table 1.24
Characteristics | RA (n = 26) | SpA (n = 26) |
---|---|---|
Sex (n [%]) | ||
2 (7.7%) | 8 (30.8%) | |
24 (92.3%) | 18 (69.2%) | |
Age (years) (mean ± SD) | 49 ± 12 | 41 ± 10 |
Diagnosis (n [%]) | ||
- | 1 (3.8%) | |
- | 13 (50%) | |
- | 12 (46.2%) | |
DAS28 (n [%]) | ||
22 (88.5%) | - | |
4 (11.5%) | - | |
DAPSA (n [%]) | ||
- | 7 (58.3%) | |
- | 5 (41.7%) | |
ASDAS (n [%]) | ||
- | 12 (85.7%) | |
- | 2 (14.3%) | |
Rheumatoid factor positive (n [%]) | 26 (100%) | - |
LRG (n [%]) | ||
6 (23.1%) | 4 (15.4%) | |
20 (76.9%) | 22 (84.6%) | |
LRG level (μg/dL) (median [range]) | 77.03 (27.16–107.73) | 68.9 ± 21.5* |
CRP level (mg/dL) (median [range]) | 13.9 (1.2–45.5) | 9.45 (0.6–54.2) |
Treatment (n [%]) | ||
5 (19.2%) | 2 (7.7%) | |
12 (46.2%) | 18 (69.2%) | |
7 (26.9%) | 5 (19.2%) | |
2 (7.7%) | 1 (3.9%) | |
Glucocorticoid use (n [%]) | ||
6 (23.1%) | 6 (23.1%) | |
11 (42.3%) | 3 (11.5%) | |
9 (34.6%) | - | |
- | 17 (65.4%) | |
Disease onset (n [%]) | ||
5 (19.2%) | 1 (3.85%) | |
21 (80.8%) | 25 (96.15%) | |
Comorbidities (n [%]) | ||
6 (23%) | 10 (38.5%) | |
10 (38.5%) | 11 (42.3%) | |
10 (38.5%) | 5 (19.2%) |
* Mean was used as the data was normally distributed; RA: rheumatoid arthritis; SpA: spondyloarthritis; DAS28: disease activity score-28 for rheumatoid arthritis; DAPSA: disease activity index for psoriatic arthritis; ASDAS: ankylosing spondylitis disease activity score; LRG: leucine-rich alpha-2 glycoprotein; CRP: C-reactive protein; DMARD: disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs; NSAID: non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs
LRG levels of the SpA and RA patients were analyzed with the Mann-Whitney test because the subjects obtained were not normally distributed. The test showed no statistical difference between the LRG levels of patients in the RA group (mean rank = 28.12) and those in the SpA group (mean rank = 24.88); Mann-Whitney U = 296, p = .442 two-tailed.
In this study, patient LRG levels were further grouped based on disease activity, onset, comorbidity, and treatment (Table 2). Meanwhile, Table 3 shows the serum LRG levels of RA and SpA patients based on disease onset. Additional analyses were also conducted to determine the difference in LRG levels between the RA group and the SpA group based on CRP levels and disease activity.
LRG levels (n [%]) | New onset | Old Onset | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
RA | SpA | RA | SpA | |
Normal (21–50 μg/dL) | - | - | 6 (28.6%) | 4 (16%) |
Increased (> 50 μg/dL) | 5 (100%) | 1 (100%) | 15 (71.4%) | 21 (84%) |
Patients with elevated CRP were analyzed separately as means to control the potential subjectivity in the assessment of disease activity. Elevated CRP was observed in 21 RA patients and 20 SpA patients. As the data were not normally distributed, the Mann-Whitney test was used. The test showed no statistical difference between the LRG levels of patients with RA (mean rank = 23.24) and those with SpA (mean rank = 18.65); Mann-Whitney U = 163, p = .220 two-tailed.
Comparison of LRG levels between RA subjects with moderate disease activity (n = 22) and SpA with high-very high disease activity (n = 19) was also conducted. This additional analysis was performed to further clarify the difference in LRG levels between the two largest groups, which was composed mostly of the RA and SpA group. As the data were not normally distributed, the Mann-Whitney test was used. The test showed no statistical difference between the LRG levels of patients with RA of moderate activity (mean rank = 21.82) and those with SpA of high-very high activity (mean rank = 20.05); Mann-Whitney U = 191, n1 = 22 n2 = 19, p = .144 two-tailed.
This study recruited 26 RA patients and 26 SpA patients who visited the RSCM Rheumatology Polyclinic from March to of May 2022 and met the inclusion and exclusion criteria of the study. The sex of the RA subjects was predominantly female, aligning with the theory that women have a 2–3 times higher risk of developing RA than men. However, it was reported that no meaningful difference exists in RA incidence between men and women men over 70 years old.5 There is strong evidence that autoimmunity is influenced by genetics and sexual chromosomes. For instance, estrogen has been shown to increase the secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines and exert anti-apoptotic activity and its receptors are found on various immune cells. Hence, estrogen is associated with the development of RA.25
The majority of SpA subjects in this study were female. This predilection was also observed in the SpA subgroups, namely AS and PsA. Previous study by Baumberger et al., had shown that the majority of AS patients are male, with a ratio of 57:1 in 1980 and 1.03:1 in 2016.26 This is also supported by a study conducted by Tsui et al., which had shown that the presence of the tissue non-specific alkaline phosphatase (TNAP) haplotype, which interacts with the progressive ankylosis protein homolog (ANKH) gene (a gene that is involved in osteogenesis and ankylosis in AS), is associated with AS in men.27 Although AS is more dominant in men than women. Another subtype of SpA, namely PsA, affects men and women equally.28–30 Sex distribution is related to disease presentation because men tend to have axial involvement, whereas peripheral joint involvement is more commonly seen in women. Kennedy et al., reported that the ratio of male to female sex in PsA subjects is 2.1–4.8:1. However, it should be noted that the study took many samples with axial involvement, which is more commonly seen in men.31 Meanwhile, Nishina et al., reported a different male-dominated result in peripheral SpA patients with a ratio of 2.3:1.6.32
The mean age of RA subjects in this study was 49 years old. Other studies show that the highest incidence of RA cases is in the 50–54 year age group.33 The incidence of RA tends to increase with age. The SpA subjects had a mean age of 41 years, which was consistent with the mean age of the SpA subjects reported by Kennedy et al., i.e., under 50 years old.31 The mean age of the AS subjects in this study was 38 years old. In one study, 92% of patients with AS were less than 45 years old at disease onset.34 The mean age of the PsA subjects in this study was 41 years old. Research by Deike et al., showed that most cases of PsA began at 50–59 years old. The incidence of PsA increases with age, peaks before the age of 60 and declines aftewards.35 The age of the sole female peripheral SpA patient in this study was 48 years old, consistent with the findings of de Winter et al., which stated that the median age of patients with peripheral SpA was 48 (36–55) years old.36
Increased LRG levels were observed in the majority of both RA and SpA subjects. The highest median LRG levels were found in the RA group and the median CRP level was also higher in patients with RA. However, normal LRG results were found in six RA subjects (23.1%) and four SpA subjects (15.4%). The elevated LRG levels is consistent with findings by Birkelund et al., wherein joint fluid analysis in RA and SpA subjects showed striking differences in the number of proteins from the innate immune system, especially those from neutrophil granulocytes, including LRG. This protein was found in higher concentration in the RA patient group.22 Moreover, Nakajima et al., reported that LRG is able to differentiate RA from PsA, as shown by the significant increase in LRG levels in patients with RA compared to those with PsA. The increase in LRG concentration may be associated with higher levels of IL-6 in RA, thus increasing the activity of LRG expression.23
LRG is a protein secreted during the inflammatory process, which like CRP, is also an acute phase protein. In patients with RA, serum LRG levels were correlated with DAS28-ESR score and CRP level.19 From the six RA subjects who had normal LRG levels in this study, two had normal CRP levels. In addition, all RA patients with normal LRG levels were old onset patients who have previously received DMARD. Methotrexate is a DMARD that lowers IL-6, an important cytokine in the formation of LRG.32 The same is true for SpA subjects; from the four subjects with normal LRG levels, there was one subject with normal CRP levels. All subjects classified as old onset had received DMARD therapy in the form of methotrexate and sulfasalazine. Hence, the observed normal CRP levels and the effect of DMARD treatment may explain the presence of subjects with normal LRG levels in this study.
Based on disease onset, five RA subjects were classified as new onset patients, while 21 subjects were classified as old onset patients. LRG levels showed higher results in RA subjects classified as new onset patients. As for the SpA subjects, one subject was categorized as new onset and 25 other subjects were categorized as old onset. Aside from being untreated, the higher level of LRG observed in subjects with new onset disease may be related to IL-6 expression in the early stages of the disease. As suggested by animal studies, synovial tissue samples of animals with antigen-induced arthritis (AIA) and adjuvant-induced arthritis (AA), revealed that the expression of IL-6 peaked in the early stages of the disease and decreased in the later stages of the disease.37 Another study also found that IL-6 is expressed in the sacroiliac joints AS subjects of new disease onset.38
In this study, 17 RA subjects had comorbidities, among them were type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), osteoarthritis (OA), fibromyalgia, controlled hypertension, and pregnancy of eight weeks. The highest concentrations of LRG were found in RA patients who also had OA and fibromyalgia. Of all the subjects with SpA, 14 had comorbidities, including controlled hypertension, IBD, dyslipidemia, T2DM, osteoporosis, OA, and hyper-IgE syndrome. The highest LRG levels were obtained in subjects without comorbidities as they happen to be new onset patients.
Several studies support the prevalence of DM in patients with RA. TNF-α and IL-6 are associated with the pathogenesis of DM, insulin resistance and RA. Long-term exposure to elevated levels of IL-6 triggers insulin resistance, which may play a role in the incidence of DM in patients with RA.39 Plasma LRG levels can predict the progression of kidney disease and the incidence of albuminuria in patients with DM. LRG levels in subjects with albuminuria were significantly higher than subjects with stable albuminuria or those in regression. LRG levels in DM subjects with chronic kidney disease (CKD) progression were also much higher than subjects with normal kidney function.40 In another study, LRG levels were twice as high in subjects with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) who had been treated with hemodialysis than in patients with stage 2/3 CKD.41 Prospective study in Southeast Asia in subjects with T2DM stated that high plasma LRG levels were associated with an increased risk of heart failure events.42 LRG is a novel factor in the pathogenesis of heart failure in patients with T2DM. Elevated serum LRG is also associated with peripheral arterial disease and several risk factors for cardiovascular diseases, such as arterial stiffness and endothelial dysfunction.43 Furthermore, LRG levels were found to be elevated in subjects with IBD, as shown by the elevated levels of IL-6 in the colonic mucosal tissue of patients with IBD.44
LRG levels are also elevated in other inflammatory diseases such as OA. In a murine model of OA, increased LRG expression was found in the subchondral bone and articular cartilage.45 The increase in LRG is also associated with IL-6 as it is one of the pro-inflammatory cytokines that is elevated in OA synovial fluid samples.46 In addition, LRG is also a biomarker of fibromyalgia.23,47,48 As serum IL-6 levels are elevated in subjects with fibromyalgia, it is suggested that fibromyalgia may affect the assessment of inflammatory activity in patients with RA.49 This is in line with the results of this study, which showed that RA subjects with OA and fibromyalgia had the highest concentration of serum LRG.
The highest levels of LRG in RA subjects were found in subjects who had not received DMARD therapy, aligning with previous studies that showed that DMARD therapy reduced IL-6 concentration in patients with RA.50 As for AS subjects, the highest LRG levels were found in subjects with a combination of DMARD and steroid treatment, while the lowest was in the combination of DMARD and paracetamol. In PsA subjects, the highest LRG levels were found in the DMARD monotherapy group and the lowest in the DMARD and steroid combination group. It can be inferred that DMARDs and steroids play a role in regulating IL-6 and blocking NF-κB as promoters of LRG synthesis.32,50,51
LRG levels were found to be increased in 76.9% of subjects with RA, with the highest median LRG level observed in subjects with RA (77.03 vs. 68.67 μg/mL). These results align with the studies of Fujimoto et al., Naka et al., and Serada et al., which reported the elevation of serum LRG in various autoimmune diseases, including RA.19,52,53 Ha et al., also showed that LRG can differentiate RA patients from normal controls as serum LRG concentrations were significantly increased in patients from the RA group compared with patients in the control group.54 LRG stimulation is influenced by pro-inflammatory cytokines, one of which is IL-6, an inflammatory cytokine that is critically involved in the pathogenesis of RA and significantly correlated with serum LRG levels.55 Serum and synovial IL-6 levels are elevated in RA patients and are associated with disease activity.56 Previous study conducted by Madhok et al., showed that RA patients had higher levels of IL-6 (55 (28–139) IU/mL) compared with the control group (10 (7–12) IU/mL).57
Increased LRG levels were seen in 84.6% of subjects with SpA, with a median of 68.67 (33.15–115.18) μg/ml. Nakajima et al., previously reported that LRG levels were increased in patients with PsA (51.1 ± 32.9 μg/mL) and psoriasis vulgaris (37.8 ± 25.1 μg/mL) compared with controls (25.5 ± 11.5 μg/mL).23 A multicenter retrospective observational study showed that serum levels of IL-6 are elevated in AS and PsA subjects.38 A previous study also reported that the mean IL-6 level was significantly higher in AS subjects compared with controls.38 The highest median LRG levels in SpA subjects were found in the PsA subset in the present study.
This study found no significant difference between LRG levels in subjects with RA and SpA. This result is different from a previous study by Lee et al., LRG was also previously identified as a protein that can differentiate RA from PsA as shown by the significantly increased LRG levels in MRM analysis of patients with RA.58 In another study of 32 synovial fluid samples from RA patients and 24 synovial fluid controls, it was found that LRG in RA synovial fluid and SpA correlated significantly with synovial fluid circulating free DNA (cfDNA), and it was known that LRG was closely related to plasma CRP.59
The insignificant difference in this study may be due to other factors affecting LRG levels, including disease onset and treatment received. However, the effects of DMARD treatment on LRG levels in RA and SpA subjects have not yet been studied. Old onset subjects predominated this study. Disease onset is related to IL-6 concentration. IL-6, a known precursor of LRG, increases in both mild and severe inflammatory conditions. Higher LRG levels in subjects with new-onset may be related to IL-6 expression in the early stages of the disease, as suggested in a study by Ferraccioli et al., which showed that IL-6 is a pro-inflammatory cytokine that is expressed in the early stages of the disease and plays a role in pathogenesis.37 Expression of IL-6 in sacroiliac joint biopsies of AS patients is also associated with new disease onset.38 Besides IL-6 activity, disease onset is also related to the patient's initiation of the treatment regimen. Old onset patients in the present study were defined as patients who had been diagnosed before the time of sampling and had received DMARD. Studies have shown that RA subjects receiving DMARD therapy have decreased serum concentrations of IL-6, a known precursor for LRG formation.60 Most of the research subjects also received DMARD treatment in the form of sulfasalazine; from the results of previous studies, it was known that sulfasalazine caused a decrease in LRG levels in four female albino rats suffering from ulcerative colitis.51 The effect on subjects with SpA and RA is still unknown.
Because this study initially did not consider the level of disease activity, there was a possibility for the patients’ disease activity to be distributed unevenly. The results of this study found differences in the predominant disease activity between the two groups, wherein the RA group was predominated by moderate disease activity, while the SpA group was predominated by high to very high disease activity. The insignificant difference in LRG levels between the two groups in this study may be due to this distribution of disease activity. The difference in LRG levels between RA and SpA subjects may be more apparent if the disease activity between these two groups were controlled. A previous study conducted by Ha et al., only compared LRG levels between active and inactive RA patients, where serum LRG concentrations were found to be significantly higher in patients with active RA compared with patients with RA in remission.54 No previous study has compared LRG levels in moderate and high disease activity; the said study did not distinguish between disease activity groups. Meanwhile, we found different levels of LRG in the moderate and high to very high activity groups.
Median LRG levels based on increased CRP levels showed higher results in RA subjects than in SpA. The Mann-Whitney test results showed no significant difference in LRG levels in RA and SpA subjects with increased CRP levels. Previous studies have stated that LRG is correlated with CRP levels, as such a positive correlation between the two variables were expected.55 Future research should confirm this finding.
To the knowledge of the researchers, this is the first study to compare LRG levels of patients with RA and generalized SpA. The limitation of this study was the different predominant disease activity in the two groups. Future studies with a larger subject population along with control of DMARD status and disease activity is warranted.
The median LRG levels of the RA and SpA subjects were 77.03 (27.16–107.73) μg/dL and 68.67 (33.15–115.18) μg/dL, respectively. There was no significant difference in LRG levels between RA and SpA subjects. The role of LRG in the diagnosis of RA and SpA remains to be determined in future studies.
Mendeley Data: Underlying data for ‘Serum Leucine-Rich Alpha-2 Glycoprotein Levels in Rheumatoid Arthritis and Spondyloarthritis: A Promising Biomarker’. https://www.doi.org/10.17632/xp52nbs8r3.1. 24
The project contains the following underlying data:
- Data file 1: Dataset of the study subjects.xlsx
- Supplementary 1: Flow diagram of subject inclusion.docx
- Supplementary 2: Determination of sample size.docx
- Supplementary 3: STROBE Checklist.docx
Data are available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (CC-BY 4.0)
Views | Downloads | |
---|---|---|
F1000Research | - | - |
PubMed Central
Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.
|
- | - |
Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?
Yes
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?
Yes
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?
Partly
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?
I cannot comment. A qualified statistician is required.
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?
Yes
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?
Yes
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Reviewer Expertise: Rheumatology
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Invited Reviewers | |
---|---|
1 | |
Version 1 15 Dec 22 |
read |
Provide sufficient details of any financial or non-financial competing interests to enable users to assess whether your comments might lead a reasonable person to question your impartiality. Consider the following examples, but note that this is not an exhaustive list:
Sign up for content alerts and receive a weekly or monthly email with all newly published articles
Already registered? Sign in
The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.
You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.
You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.
If your email address is registered with us, we will email you instructions to reset your password.
If you think you should have received this email but it has not arrived, please check your spam filters and/or contact for further assistance.
Comments on this article Comments (0)