ALL Metrics
-
Views
-
Downloads
Get PDF
Get XML
Cite
Export
Track
Case Report

Case Report: Natal tooth in a four-day old newborn

[version 1; peer review: 2 approved with reservations]
PUBLISHED 14 Apr 2022
Author details Author details
OPEN PEER REVIEW
REVIEWER STATUS

Abstract

Background: A natal tooth is a tooth that is present at the time of birth. Eruption of teeth in infants is a rare phenomenon. Though rare, natal and neonatal tooth must be looked upon with great importance because they may lead to many complications.
Case report: We present a case of a four-day old baby presenting with a mandibular natal tooth, which was successfully extracted without any complications. The mother had presented with a single umbilical artery during her pregnancy, which might be the proposed etiology of the natal tooth as the exact etiology is unknown.
Conclusion: The exact etiology of natal tooth is unknown but there are a lot of factors that might be a cause. For the majority of cases, extraction is the mainstay of therapy as the risk associated is higher and can be life-threatening in most cases.

Keywords

natal tooth, congenital teeth, predecidious teeth, precocious dentition, extraction, case report

Introduction

Eruption of teeth in infants is a rare phenomenon. When present at birth they are known as natal teeth and if present during the first 30 days are known as neonatal teeth. After six months, the natural eruption of teeth occurs in infants.

The other terms used for natal and neonatal teeth from the literature are ‘congenital teeth’, ‘dentition praecox’, ‘fetal teeth’. Also, terms previously used were ‘dens connatalis’, ‘predecidious teeth’, ‘precocious dentition’.14

The incidence of natal and neonatal teeth is 1:716 to 1:30,000 as reported by Zhu and King,2 and 1:2000 to 1:3800 as reported by Chow.5 The general ratio for natal:neonatal teeth is 3:11. In most cases, these teeth are present as lower primary incisors.6 A study by Bodenhoff reported 85% of these are mandibular incisors; 11% are maxillary incisors; 3% are mandibular canines and 1% are maxillary canines or molars.7

The clinical categories of these teeth include:

  • i) A shell-like crown structure that is loosely attached to the alveolus by gingival tissue with no root.

  • ii) A solid crown attached loosely to the alveolus by gingival tissue, without or little root.

  • iii) Eruption of the incisional margin of the crown through gingival tissue.

  • iv) Edema of the gingival tissue with an un-erupted but palpable tooth.1,8

The causative factors include infection, febrile states, trauma, malnutrition, superficial position of the tooth germ, hormonal stimulation, and maternal exposure to environmental toxins.9,10 The environmental predisposing factors include polychlorinated biphenyls (PCB); polychlorinated dibenzodioxins (PCDDs) and polychlorinated dibenzofurans (PCDFs), which are usually believed to cross the placenta and the concentrations of these are found in adipose tissues of newborns, which are then correlated with those present in the mother’s milk.11,12

The complications might include discomfort during suckling, laceration of the mother’s breast, sublingual ulceration (Riga-Fede disease) with feeding refusal, ulceration on the ventral surface of the tongue caused by the tooth’s sharp incisal edge and swallowing or aspiration of teeth.10,13

If extraction is considered as a treatment plan, the clinician should assess the risk of hemorrhage and wellbeing of the baby especially in the case of supernumerary teeth. For mature teeth of normal dentition, it is crucial to take measures to preserve the tooth in healthy condition in the baby’s mouth using appropriate clinical resources.

Case report

A four-day old male baby born through lower segment cesarean section (LSCS) weighing 2.89 kilograms presented with a gum-like appearance at birth on the lower jaw. On noticing the projection, he was brought to medical attention on day four after birth. Eruption of a tooth started from the gum like projection from day eight and the tooth fully erupted a month after his birth. His maternal records showed a single umbilical artery (SUA) in targeted imaging for fetal anomalies (TIFFA). He was otherwise an active baby with adequate feeds. The diagnosis made by the pediatric team was natal tooth.

His birth records showed a bleeding time of two minutes 45 seconds and a clotting time of four minutes. In view of a single umbilical artery, the baby was referred for ultrasonography (USG) abdomen and pelvis which was normal. He was vaccinated as per immunization protocols.

The gum-like appearance further protruded and presented as a tooth over time (Figure 1).

0aa91e93-e3fd-4376-9a22-255ba663ecf8_figure1.gif

Figure 1. A: A gum like projection on the anterior region of the lower jaw (day 4) B: Beginning of tooth eruption from the projection (day 9); C: Fully erupted natal tooth (day 30); D: Post-extraction (day 30).

The baby was then referred for a dental consultation. The dentist made a note of the complaints as hard tissue in the lower front teeth region and natal tooth in the lower gum pad in the anterior region (Figure 1). The plan of treatment was the extraction of the tooth (Figure 2). Post extraction was uneventful without any complications. The parents were counseled for post-operative instructions and advised to maintain oral hygiene and review after one week.

0aa91e93-e3fd-4376-9a22-255ba663ecf8_figure2.gif

Figure 2. Extracted tooth.

The timeline of important events is as follows:

January 2, 2022: The child was born.

January 6, 2022: Gum like projection on the anterior region of lower jaw.

January 11, 2022: Notable eruption of tooth in the anterior region of lower jaw.

February 1, 2022: Dental consultation and extraction of tooth.

Discussion

Natal or neonatal teeth are conical or yellowish with hypoplastic enamel and dentin with poor or absent development of the root. In most cases, these teeth are mobile.2,14,15 The predisposing factors include dominant autosomal traits, endocrine disturbances (pituitary, thyroid, gonads), excessive or increased resorption of overlying bone, poor mental health, and congenital syphilis.16 A study by Gladen et al. reported 13 out of 128 infants having natal or neonatal teeth and showed that the mother was heavily exposed to polychlorinated biphenyls and benzofurans in Taiwan.11 On the other side, a study by Alaluusua et al. showed no association between milk levels of polychlorinated biphenyls and benzofurans with the occurrence of a natal tooth.12

No intervention is necessary if the tooth doesn’t interfere with breastfeeding and is asymptomatic. Extraction is recommended if the tooth is supernumerary and consultation with a pediatrician is strongly recommended.10

The treatment options include:

  • Maintenance of tooth in the mouth, unless this would cause injury to the baby.

  • When the tooth is not mobile it should be left unless it interferes with feeding.

  • When highly mobile, the risk of aspiration is high. So, extraction might be the mainstay for treatment.7,10

The factors that need to be considered include implantation and degrees of mobility, inconveniences during suckling, interference with breastfeeding and possibility of traumatic injury.17

A study by Allwright reported extraction of 25 natal teeth with no complications of hemorrhage due to the risk of hypothrombinemia.18 All the extraction procedures were done in babies who were older than 20 days and it is recommended that the child is at least 10 days old for safer outcomes.18,19 If it is not possible to wait, then evaluation of the need and administration of vitamin K should be performed to prevent hemorrhage. The advisable dose is 0.5–1 mg, which is given intramuscularly.20

Most importantly, the decision of retaining or extracting the tooth should be carefully evaluated for three factors: scientific knowledge, clinical common sense, and parenteral concern. It is very important to give complete information to the parents before letting them decide.

Conclusion

Natal tooth is presented as a rare indication in infants. The exact etiology is unknown but there are a lot of factors that might be a cause. For the majority of cases, extraction is the mainstay of therapy as the associated risk of retaining the tooth is higher and can be life-threatening in most cases. A study on the accelerated or premature pattern of dental development will provide more insights.

Data availability

All the data underlying the results are available as part of the article and no additional source data are required.

Consent

Written informed consent for publication of the clinical details and clinical images was obtained from the parents of the patient.

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 1
VERSION 1 PUBLISHED 14 Apr 2022
Comment
Author details Author details
Competing interests
Grant information
Copyright
Download
 
Export To
metrics
Views Downloads
F1000Research - -
PubMed Central
Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.
- -
Citations
CITE
how to cite this article
Fatima N, Karki S, Pokharel S and Basnet S. Case Report: Natal tooth in a four-day old newborn [version 1; peer review: 2 approved with reservations]. F1000Research 2022, 11:423 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.109706.1)
NOTE: If applicable, it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
track
receive updates on this article
Track an article to receive email alerts on any updates to this article.

Open Peer Review

Current Reviewer Status: ?
Key to Reviewer Statuses VIEW
ApprovedThe paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approvedFundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions
Version 1
VERSION 1
PUBLISHED 14 Apr 2022
Views
1
Cite
Reviewer Report 09 Oct 2023
Arlette Suzy Setiawan, Universitas Padjadjaran, Sumedang, Indonesia 
Approved with Reservations
VIEWS 1
Overall, this article offers a comprehensive insight into the topic of natal and neonatal teeth. Here’s a critical appraisal:

Strengths:
  1. In-depth Introduction: The introduction comprehensively introduces the reader to the topic, offers definitions,
... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
Setiawan AS. Reviewer Report For: Case Report: Natal tooth in a four-day old newborn [version 1; peer review: 2 approved with reservations]. F1000Research 2022, 11:423 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.121246.r198647)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
Views
6
Cite
Reviewer Report 31 Jul 2023
Maria Alzira Cavacas, Instituto Universitário Egas Moniz, Almada, Portugal 
Approved with Reservations
VIEWS 6
Dear Authors,

Congratulations for your work!

The topic is interesting and, despite not being very common, it can help to articulate the way of conduct between clinicians/pediatricians and dentists when confronted with these clinical ... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
Cavacas MA. Reviewer Report For: Case Report: Natal tooth in a four-day old newborn [version 1; peer review: 2 approved with reservations]. F1000Research 2022, 11:423 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.121246.r184917)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 1
VERSION 1 PUBLISHED 14 Apr 2022
Comment
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Approved - the paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations - A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approved - fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions
Sign In
If you've forgotten your password, please enter your email address below and we'll send you instructions on how to reset your password.

The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.

Email address not valid, please try again

You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.

You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.

Code not correct, please try again
Email us for further assistance.
Server error, please try again.