Keywords
HSV-2, IgM, IgG, ELISA, pregnant women, Wad Madani, Sudan
HSV-2, IgM, IgG, ELISA, pregnant women, Wad Madani, Sudan
Herpes viruses are double-strand DNA viruses that belong to the family herpesviridae, subfamily Alpha herpesvirinae.1 Infection with herpes simplex virus (HSV) is one of the world’s most common viral sexually transmitted diseases2 that is categorised into HSV-type 1 (HSV-1) transmitted through oral contact, and HSV-type 2 (HSV-2) which is transmitted through sexual contact.3 Although there are a lot of undiagnosed cases as most infected persons are either asymptomatic or have genital symptoms that remain unrecognized,4 HSV-2 is the most leading cause of genital herpes, particularly in third world countries.5
The seropositivity of HSV-2 is increasing in individuals between the ages of 27-28 years worldwide.6 The seroprevalence of HSV-2 is higher in developing countries than in developed ones.7 Substantially greater HSV-2 levels have been observed in sub-Saharan Africa, where the prevalence in adults ages ranging from 10 to 50% in men and 30 to 80% in women.8 Females are more susceptible to HSV-2 (30%-80%) than males (10%-50%),9 because male-to-female transmission is easier than female-to-male transmission.10 The prevalence of Asian countries’ overall population indicates elevated values, from 10% to 30%.11 In developing nations, it is unusual to have regular health checks unless there is a sign and symptom of the disease, which contributes to the increasing rate of this disease. The frequency of HSV-2 infection among commercial female sex workers is above 80% in some African countries.9
As a prevalent pathogen, HSV also contributes to lifelong latent infection, and it is possibly associated with mother-to-fetus transmission involving the feto-placental unit.11,12 As such, this infection can cause considerable miscarriage among pregnant women and a higher risk to their infants leading to serious complications including intrauterine growth retardation, intrauterine fetal death, preterm labour, miscarriage, congenital and neonatal herpes infections13
The mortality rate for neonatal herpes (both HSV1 and 2) is 60% when left untreated.14 The risk of neonatal infection is 30% to 50% when HSV infection is acquired in the last trimester, although the risk in early pregnancy is only 1%.15 Approximately, 90% of all neonates’ HSV infections are transmitted during delivery and at least 5% are transmitted in utero.16 Despite the burden caused by these viruses, there are limited epidemiological data regarding these infections in Sudan. Therefore, the aim of this study was to assess the seroprevalence of HSV-2 and associated risk factors among pregnant women in Wad-Madani at Al Gezira State-Sudan.
This descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted in Wad-Madani Maternity Hospital and Dr. Altigani Sedeeg Fertility Center in Al Gezira State in Sudan between April and August 2018. Data was collected through a questionnaire from pregnant women. Additionally, blood specimens were taken from selected pregnant women who had given consent after the aims and significance of the study had been explained.
The study was approved by the Ethical Committee of the College of Medical Laboratory Science, Sudan University of Science and Technology ethical approval No: (ECC-MLS-01-18).
Written informed consent was obtained from each participant before data collection and publication.
Blood samples for antibody detection were collected from 92 randomly selected pregnant women and centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 5 minutes to obtain serum then stored at -20°C until tested.
The ELISA technique (Chemux BioScience, USA) (HSV2 IgM Kits Lot No: 18-D4-061 HSV2 IgG Kits Lot No: 18-D4-018) was done according to the instruction sheet. The samples were left to reach room temperature for at least 30 minutes after which they were mixed thoroughly by the vortex, prior to use. Dilutions (1:40) were prepared by adding 5 μL of the sample (added once), negative control, positive control, and calibrator, to 200 μL of sample diluent. 100 μL of diluted sera, calibrator, and controls were added to a flat-bottom 96-well plate. The plate was incubated at room temperature for 30 minutes. A 100 μL of enzyme conjugate was added to each well and incubated for further 30 minutes at room temperature, then the enzyme conjugate from all wells were removed, and the plate was washed three times with washing buffer. A 100 μL of 3,3′5,5′-Tetramethylbenzidine (TMB) chromogenic substrate was added to each well and incubated for 15 minutes at room temperature, followed by 100 μL of stop solution. The plate was read on a microplate reader at 450 nm (the sample added once). HSV-2 IgM/IgG Index less than 0.90 was considered negative for IgM/IgG antibody, while HSV-2 IgM/IgG Index between 0.91-0.99 were considered as equivocal. HSV-2 IgM/IgG Index of 1.00 or greater is positive for IgM/IgG antibody.
The data were analyzed by Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) software version 11.5. Frequencies, means and standard deviations (SD) were calculated. Pearson Chi-square test was performed between qualitative variables. A p.value of ≤ 0.05 was considered as significant for all statistical tests in this study.
In this study, 92 pregnant women aged between 15 till 44 years (26+ 6.103 SD) were included. In total, 46 of pregnant women were 15-24 years old, 35 were 25-34 years old, and 11 were 35-45 years old.
It was observed that the seroprevalence of HSV-2 IgM antibodies was 35(38%), while for HSV-2 IgG it was 90(97.8%) (Figure 1. When considering the age group, ut of the 92 pregnant women; HSV-2 IgM was detected in 13 (14.1%) and IgG in 45 (58.9%) among age group15–24 years; 12(13%) for IgM, and 34(36.9%) for IgG among (25-34) years; and 10(10.9%) for IgM and 11(12%) for IgG among (35-44) years. Furthermore, the seropositivity of HSV-2 IgM/IgG during gestational stages were: 26/35 (34.2%), 75/90 (81.5%) in the first trimester, and 9/35 (9.8%), 15/90 (16.3%) in the second trimester for IgM and IgG, respectively. The seroprevalence of HVS-2 IgM among pregnant women with a history of abortion was 19 (20.7%), while HSV-2 IgG was 40 (43.5%). In addition, 16 (17.4%) cases of IgM and 50 (54.3%) cases of IgG were detected among pregnant women without a history of abortion. In this study, the seroprevalence of HSV-2 IgM showed a high association with the age of pregnant women (p.value=0.001), while gestational stage and history of abortion showed no association with seroprevalence of both HSV-2 IgM and IgG (p.value >0.05) as shown in Table 1.
HSV is a common sexually transmitted infection, and the prevalence of this infection has increased significantly over the last two decades in many developed and developing countries.17 In the reproductive age group, it is an important cause of intra-uterine fetal and neonatal infection when transmitted from mother to fetus.17
The results of this study indicated that the seroprevalence of HSV-2 IgM among pregnant women was 38% and 97.8% for IgG. Slightly similar results were observed by Alshareef et al. (2017) in Sudan, who reported 87.8% of pregnant women were HSV-2 IgG positive.18 Another study conducted by Zaki and Goda (2007), in Egypt showed that 40% of pregnant women were positive for IgM,19 while a study conducted in Cote D’Ivoire by Cisse et al. (2015) indicated that 96.5% tested positive for HSV-2 IgG.20
The obtained results were relatively high when compared with similar studies carried out in other Sudan states and other countries.21,22 The reason for this difference could be related to the rate of virus exposure, the virus’s presence in a certain region, the virus’s susceptibility rate, and people’s immunological condition. Unlike the mentioned studies, lower results were obtained by Hussan (2014) in Baghdad, who reported that the prevalence of HSV-2 IgM was 4.76% among pregnant women.23
The present study found an increase in HSV-2 seroprevalence in the age groups 15–24 years 12(34. 2%), this was consistent with many studies done in Sudan such as Edress and Elhag (2015) and El-Amin et al. (2013).21,22 Also, the similar result was found in a study by Tiwari et al. (2016) in New Delhi, India.24 There are many reasons that may explain the high incidence of HSV-2 in women in this age group, especially individuals aged 20 to 29 years, as these women are highly reproductive in this age range and are more susceptible to chronic infections such as HSV-2, and the prevalence of primary or recurrent HSV-2 infection peaks during this time period.
According to the gestational stage, HSV-2 IgM and IgG were the highest in the second trimester (52.9%) followed by the first trimester (34.6%). These findings agreed with Edress and Elhag (2015), who reported the percentage of IgM to be 1.7% in the first trimester and 3.7% in the second trimester21 and Mezher et al. (2018) in Iran found that HSV-2 seropositivity was (16.7%), (29.2%) in the first trimester, and (45.8%), (8.3%) in the second trimester for aborted and pregnant women, respectively.25 While, Mohammad and Salman showed a maximum rate of HSV-2 infection at second trimester,26 and Amar et al. (2015) in India showed that the seropositivity of IgM were 3.3% in the first, and 1.1% in the second trimester.27
The prevalence of HSV-2 IgG, IgM antibody among women who have had a history of abortion was not significant (p value>0.05) compared to women without a history of abortion. These finding was not in line with Assayaghi et al. (2017) in Yemen (p-value 0.6, 0.4) and Oluwapelumi et al. (2020).28,29 Another study by Mezher et al. (2018) indicated that the detection of HSV-2 in women who had a history of abortion was higher than in pregnant, and that may improve the probability of this virus as one of the main viral agents that cause abortion. Many studies have suggested that HSV-2 infection may be a risk factor for miscarriage abortion; nevertheless, HSV-2 infection was detected in a small percentage of women with a history of abortion, suggesting that HSV infection is unlikely to be a major factor in abortion.25
The variation in the obtained results may be due to geographical regions where the studies were conducted, the sample size technique used for analysis, and the limited period which those studies were carried out.
To the authors’ knowledge, there is no published data about the prevalence of HSV-2 among pregnant women in Wad-Madani, Al Gezira State, Sudan. As a result of this study there was a significant frequency of HSV-2 infection among pregnant women in Wad-Madani, particularly among those aged 15 to 24 years.
There was a significant relationship between HSV-2 IgM seropositivity and the age of the pregnant woman. However, the differences between HSV-2 IgG and IgM seropositivity rates in other socio- epidemiological data (gestational trimester and history of abortion) didn’t display statistical significance.
Further studies were recommended.
It is necessary to analyze these findings with more advanced techniques and study the role of HSV-2 in abortion with a larger sample size in order to fully support these conclusions. Also, the analytical study designs can give more accurate results. As this was a cross-sectional study, no assessments were done for pregnant women for subsequent miscarriage or neonatal death. Case control or cohort’s studies will obtain more accurate results and the relation between risk factors and outcomes will be highlighted clearly.
Figshare: Herpes simplex virus, https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.19375088.v4
This project contains the following underlying data:
Data file 1. Study questionnaire
Data file 2. ELISA data
Nuha.xls (HSV-2 raw Data)
Nuha dictionary.docx. (HSV-2 data dictionary)
Data are available under the terms of the Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)
Views | Downloads | |
---|---|---|
F1000Research | - | - |
PubMed Central
Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.
|
- | - |
Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?
Partly
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?
Partly
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?
Yes
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?
Partly
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?
Yes
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?
Partly
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Reviewer Expertise: Pathogenesis and immunity to HSV
Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?
Partly
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?
Partly
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?
Partly
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?
Partly
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?
Partly
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?
Partly
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Reviewer Expertise: Biomarkers, infectious disease (HIV, HPV, HSV), cancer
Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?
Yes
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?
Yes
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?
Partly
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?
I cannot comment. A qualified statistician is required.
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?
Yes
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?
Yes
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Reviewer Expertise: Medical microbiology (virology, bacteriology, mycology), immunology
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Invited Reviewers | |||
---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | |
Version 1 06 Jul 22 |
read | read | read |
Provide sufficient details of any financial or non-financial competing interests to enable users to assess whether your comments might lead a reasonable person to question your impartiality. Consider the following examples, but note that this is not an exhaustive list:
Sign up for content alerts and receive a weekly or monthly email with all newly published articles
Already registered? Sign in
The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.
You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.
You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.
If your email address is registered with us, we will email you instructions to reset your password.
If you think you should have received this email but it has not arrived, please check your spam filters and/or contact for further assistance.
Comments on this article Comments (0)