ALL Metrics
-
Views
-
Downloads
Get PDF
Get XML
Cite
Export
Track
Research Article

An exploration of trends and future directions in sustainability performance: A bibliometric analysis of Scopus database

[version 1; peer review: 4 approved with reservations]
PUBLISHED 29 Jul 2022
Author details Author details
OPEN PEER REVIEW
REVIEWER STATUS

This article is included in the Research on Research, Policy & Culture gateway.

Abstract

Background: Current global economic activities are increasingly being perceived as unsustainable. With the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) statement in 2015, sustainability performance has received significant attention. Thus, it is necessary to better understand the topics of interest and expand cooperation networks to advance studies in integrated efforts. The present bibliometric research intends to assess worldwide research tendency in sustainability performance.
Methods: We conducted an extensive bibliometric analysis of published academic articles on sustainability performance (SP) from 1997 to 2021. We reviewed, retrieved, and analysed 3680 papers published in Scopus. Specifically, VOSviewer software was used to conduct document co-authorship and co-occurrence analyses and burst detection analyses.
Results: The outcomes reveal that since 1997, the sum of publications has been on the rise steadily. About a third of all global papers on sustainability performance were produced by researchers from the United States and Australia, outnumbering the remaining 138 countries/territories. Furthermore, the ten most prolific authors of sustainability performance are all from universities. Haapala, Karl R. and Murat Kucukvar were the most influential authors found, based on the total publication number of sustainability performance.
Conclusions: The bibliometric analysis was conducted to identify the trends in the area of sustainability performance. Therefore, this study identified a significant research gap for future study of practitioners and researchers. The social sustainability and the relationship between the material flow analysis and sustainability performance should be noted. In addition, only the Scopus database has been considered due to its academic prestige. The database includes a large number of articles on sustainability performance. Therefore, the analysis was limited to the Scopus database only. However, other databases, such as Web of Science, Google Scholar, and MedLine, can be used for future research. These can also be used in combination.

Keywords

Sustainability performance, Scopus database, bibliometric analysis, co-citation analysis, co-occurrence analysis

Introduction

According to the World Meteorological Organization, the period 2015–2020 was the warmest on record, with global climate change increasing by 0.2 percent compared to 2011–20151,2. The 20% increase in global carbon emissions was among the factors contributing to this change, which was also higher than 410 parts per million (ppm) at the end of 20202. However, the concentration of the major greenhouse gases showed a continuous increase in 2020. A similar trend showed through carbon dioxide (CO2) concentration as in previous years could amount to 414 ppm or higher in 20212. In 2018, across the world, an overall US$166 billion economy loss and 55.3 Giga tera (Gt) of carbon dioxide (CO2) equivalent emissions were attributed to 831 critical phenomena associated with climate3. Sustainable development has become a universal concern across countries following the increasing socio-environmental issues, including climate change, pollution, and multiple health issues due to pollution4.

In 2015, all United Nations (U.N.) member states implemented Sustainable Development Goals (S.D.G.s) to eradicate poverty, provide protection to the earth, and achieve prosperity by 20305. In the period of sustainable development, all organisations are recommended to enhance perceptiveness in achieving sustainable development objectives associated with social well-being, economic prosperity, and environmental preservation6. Notably, sustainability performance helps organisations obtain a competitive advantage in the market that is progressing towards a greener economy, achieve significant financial gains, and attract customers to assure long-term profitability7,8.

Therefore, sustainability performance has been under close attention by researchers, scholars, and practitioners. Furthermore, a considerable number of papers and special journal issues are available, covering a wide range of themes related to sustainability performance911. However, very few studies concerning the bibliometric analysis of sustainability performance form global perspective using VOSviewer. VOSviewer is a tool to carry out bibliometric analysis, which is helpful to comprehend the research topic status12. Additionally, this study used Scopus as a source of data mining. Scopus is the biggest database of abstracts and citations, with 1.4 billion citations and 16 million researcher information13. The Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus databases are remarkably overlapped in terms of journal indexing14. As a result, employing Scopus aims to cover a broader range of topics.

In conclusion, this study aims to conduct a bibliometric analysis of sustainability performance from 1997 to 2021. It intends to identify the trend of publication of papers in the said area, identify the prolific contributors in sustainability performance, analyze co-authorship of different researchers and nations, and analyze the co-occurrence of author keywords. This study will help scholars, policymakers, and industry grasp the research tendency in sustainability performance and identify the orientations for their research.

Sustainability performance

The concept of sustainable development has aroused more and more academic interest over the past decade due to the increasing environmental crises, inclusive of climatic variations, contamination and substantial health crises derived from contamination4. The concept of sustainable development denotes the present generation’s capability of fulfilling necessities without jeopardizing the development of our offspring15,16. Such a concept has three pivotal elements (society, environment, and economy) when it comes to producing commodities4,17.

The leading research focus currently emphasizes sustainability performance. According to 18, sustainability performance benefits from economic, social, and environmental coordination. Eventually, it fulfils stakeholders’ necessities, enhances profit, competitiveness, and organizations’ resilience in the short and long term. Numerous research (e.g. 17,1921) has identified sustainability performance dimensions, such as environmental, economic, and society-level performances, called triple bottom line (TBL). The TBL, including economic benefit, ecological environment, and social responsibility, do not exist independently as a link to associate them. For example 22 argued that organizations highlighting TBL could achieve better economy-wise performances in contrast to those highlighting 1 or 2 aspects23,24. Higher economic gains encourage organisations to adopt better social responsibility25. Organisations with robust economic strength can splurge additional money on treating pollution, offer advantages to the society and enhance the employees’ well-being26,27. Hence, sustainable development performance can be evaluated as per the economy, society, and environmental influences28.

The performance of sustainable development herein primarily denotes that corporations should manufacture on the foundation of the entire TBL. Furthermore, enterprises should minimize the expenditure, uplift consumers’ contentment, decrease discontentment, focus on developing green packaging, diminish unnecessary deliveries, and use environmentally friendly materials to minimize environmental impacts. Hence, sustainable development performance can be evaluated as per the economy, society, and environmental influences28.

Methods

In this study, bibliometric analysis was used as a research method. Bibliometric analyses are a quantification method assisting in identifying and analysing data correlated with keywords, their associations, the number of papers published within a certain time limit and their citations29,30. 31 employed this strategy, and other studies have used a similar methodology, such as 3234, with Gaur and Kumar providing an in-depth assessment (2018).

Figure 1 depicts how to collect the articles for bibliometric analysis. The subsections that follow explain each of the stages shown in Figure 1.

7c6413cf-e9e3-4403-bdd2-b56e19c979d8_figure1.gif

Figure 1. Steps for selecting articles.

Data source and search strategy

First, the research theme of sustainability performance was defined. Furthermore, this study aims to explore worldwide research tendency in sustainability performance to identify gaps and make research recommendations. Based on the research question and objectives, the article searching keywords were established. The full search strategy, retrieved by topic = “sustainability performance” or “triple bottom line” or “TBL”. The timespan is 1997–2021, and the retrieval time was 13 October 2021.

The present paper was based on the Scopus database core collection to guarantee the data’s scientific and completeness. Scopus is the largest database of abstracts and citations, with 1.4 billion citations and 16 million author data35. The Scopus database is superior to similar alternatives since it indexes approximately 70% more sources36. It gives more thorough coverage of the newest literature, according to 37.

After the research searching keywords were chosen, the inclusion criteria (IC) were constructed. There were four criteria for inclusion:

  • IC1: To include papers containing the research subject, which was “sustainability performance”, and the research premises/objective should match the paper’s objective.

  • IC2: To include papers that eliminated letters, duplications, book reviews, editorials, conference proceedings and unpublished research.

  • IC3: To include only papers within the analysis time (1997 – 2021).

  • IC4: To include papers that limited the research fields (called “subject area” in databases) to environmental science, engineering, commercial activities, economy and society-wise research, and decision-making sciences.

The inclusion criteria contributed to the selection of articles, with only those that met all of them being chosen.

Process of selecting articles

Posterior to the initial search, we completed screening practically and methodologically to guarantee the correlation of literature, during which it needed to involve ⩾ 1 keyword aforementioned in the topics, abstracts, keywords. Our team completed the initial selection for approximately 5428 literature and afterwards discussed the outcomes to generate consensus. Subsequently, we reviewed the entire databases and checked associations via reading the abstracts when necessary. As a result, the 3687 articles were identified through Search Filters 1 (SF1), which read the title, abstract, and keywords. Only articles that demonstrated potential for achieving the four inclusion criteria cleared SF1 (IC1, IC2, IC3 and IC4). Afterwards, there were 3680 articles retrieved after full reading (SF2). The procedure of study inclusion and record exclusion was presented in Table 1. Please note that the full list of included studies is available in Underlying data.

Table 1. The Process of Review.

StepsProcedureData systematization
Article searchingSearched articles in Scopus databases with
keywords. “Sustainability performance” or
“sustainability” or “triple bottom line”
5428
InclusionArticles selected after reading title, abstract, and
keywords (SF1)
3687
Articles identificationArticles selected after full reading (SF2)3680

Data analysis method

After data selection, there were a total of 3680 articles extracted for analysis. Furthermore, with the fast advancement of data mining, informational analyses and graphics rendering techniques, it’s probable to utilise computers to study substantial literature data and complete data expression via visualising data results38. This research will use this kind of bibliometric analysis tool, VOSviewer, to perform a quantitative analysis of the relevant literature39.

Van Eck and Waltman of Leiden University in the Netherlands created VOSviewer, a program for constructing and visualizing econometrical networks. It’s capable of creating a corresponding knowledge map, identifying the research area’s knowledge base, and providing the most up-to-date progress in related research, as well as frontier hotspots, evolution paths, and future development trends in sustainability performance research, all of which are intended to serve as references and a foundation for future research38.

Results and discussion

Literature development trends

As presented by Figure 2, for the period of almost 24 years, 3680 papers were published, given the limitations in the search string. The results obtained from the preliminary analysis revealed that the oldest publication was dated 1997. The trends of the quantity of the literature witnessed relatively low before the year 2001. However, it increased gradually from then on, which showed there would be more documents to pour into the literature on sustainability performance. It may have been due to the increasing environmental crises, climatic variations, contamination and substantial health problems derived from contamination, and the fact that the concept of sustainable development had been widely accepted among the industries4. In addition, almost 400 publications were published in each of the last three years. It reflects that this trend will also grow by the rapidly increasing rate, which shows the importance of the topic of sustainability performance.

7c6413cf-e9e3-4403-bdd2-b56e19c979d8_figure2.gif

Figure 2. Number of annual publications in sustainability performance research.

Most influential authors

Table 2 presents the ten most productive authors in sustainability performance from five nations: the United States (4 authors), Canada (3 authors), China (1 author), Norway (1 author), and Qatar (1 author). The first publications ranged between 2009–2015, where five authors were the first authors, three were co-authors, and two were the last authors. Although there isn’t any rule pertaining to author sequence, the first author is often related to the most contribution. Also, the affiliations of authors displayed that sustainability performance studies were mainly conducted in the university.

Table 2. Ten most productive researchers in sustainability performance study field.

NoAuthorScopus author
I.D.
Year of 1st
publication
T.P.h-indexTCCurrent affiliationCountry
1Haapala, Karl R.1300525510020132520132Oregon State University,
Corvallis, United States
United States
2Murat Kucukvar3666115900020112435995Qatar UniversityQatar
3Badurdeen,
Fazleena F.
1452047980020091720500The University of
Kentucky, Lexington,
United States
United States
4Hewage, Kasun N.838428670020111734473University of British
Columbia Okanagan,
Kelowna, Canada
Canada
5Tatari, Omer1462787650020111736842The University of Central
Florida, Orlando, United
States
United States
6Shen, Liyin700509199420091559713Chongqing University,
Chongqing, China
China
7Svensson, Göran5720241150720151418178Kristiania University
College, Oslo, Norway
Norway
8Sadiq, Rehan700360467920111254461University of British
Columbia Okanagan,
Kelowna, Canada
Canada
9Egilmez, Gokhan5524834620020141124595University of New
Haven, West Haven,
United States
United States
10Searcy, Cory845335460020091131277Ryerson University,
Toronto, Canada
Canada

*Note = TP: Total Publication/ TC: Total Citation

As shown in Table 2, Haapala, Karl R. can be seen as the most prolific researcher in the field of sustainable performance, having produced the most papers, which is 25. Also, this study checked the hottest research topic of the ten most prolific authors in the last five years. The research of Haapala mainly focuses on sustainable manufacturing issues in recent years. Conversely, only Haapala focuses on sustainable manufacturing areas among the top ten prominent researchers. At the same time, material flow analysis is the most popular research topic among the top ten contributing authors, including Kucukvar, Tatari, Shen and Egilmez. The second most popular research topic is the green supply chain, which was investigated by three authors, involving Searcy, Svensson and Badurdeen. Authors Hewage and Sadiq, with the identical study field of life cycle assessment, co-authored a report entitled “Sustainability assessment of flooring systems in the city of Tehran: An AHP-based life cycle analysis”.

The most productive journal

The literature review should be a valid approach to identify the conceptual content of the research area and guide further studies40, whereas identifying the most tightly associated and essential research is pivotal for the bibliography. The top 10 sustainability performance-associated journals are presented in Table 3. As shown in Table 3, the top 10 most prolific journals are owned by five publishers. Four of the top ten journals were published by Elsevier. The most prolific journal was the Journal of Cleaner Production, with 9658 papers covering 299% of the overall publications. The Journal of Cleaner Production has been cited in many papers, which can explain why the CiteScore is remarkably high. As is known to all, the CiteScore can impact authors’ decision-making in selecting journals suiting their original and note-worthy works. Also, after investigation, the Journal of Cleaner Production strongly connects to clean manufacturing, environmental challenges, and sustainable development.

Table 3. The top 10 most prolific journals on sustainability performance study field.

JournalT.P.
(%)
TCCiteScore
2020
The most cited
article(reference)
Time
cited
Publisher
Journal of Cleaner
Production
299965813.1A fuzzy multi-criteria approach
for measuring sustainability
performance of a supplier based
on triple bottom line approach
510Elsevier
Sustainability
Switzerland
20419923.9Development of a risk framework
for Industry 4.0 in the context
of sustainability for established
manufacturers
63Multidisciplinary Digital
Publishing Institute
Business Strategy and
the Environment
37208510.3Measuring organizational
performance: Beyond the triple
bottom line
359Wiley-Blackwell
International Journal of
Production Economics
31176712.2Sustainable operations: Their
impact on the triple bottom line
404Elsevier
Journal of Business
Ethics
3018179.0W(h)ither ecology? The Triple
Bottom Line, the Global
Reporting Initiative, and
Corporate Sustainability
Reporting
377Springer Nature
Ecological Indicators2910927.5Development of composite
sustainability performance index
for the steel industry
263Elsevier
Resources
Conservation
2783014.7A model for integrated
assessment and Recycling of
sustainable development
308Elsevier
International Journal of239547.8Impact categories for life
cycle Life Cycle Assessment
assessment research of seafood
production systems: Review and
prospectus
144Springer Nature
International Journal of
Production Research
23110510.8Does sustainable supplier
cooperation affect performance?
Examining implications for the
triple bottom line
190Taylor & Francis
Corporate Social
Responsibility and
Environmental
Management
213978.0The global reporting initiative
and corporate sustainability
reporting in Swedish companies
161Wiley-Blackwell

*Note = TP: Total Publication/ TC: Total Citation

In addition, as shown in Table 3, the top ten journals are nearly all of excellent quality (as they are all SCI or SCIE), such as the social science citation index or science citation index expanded, except for the Sustainability Switzerland. Also, the CiteScore of Sustainability Switzerland is low. But the Sustainability Switzerland is still among the top two most productive journals. That might be because the authors consider the CiteScore and take into account if the journal can deliver research to appropriate readers and facilitate the development of the research area. Sustainability Switzerland is mainly related to sustainability and sustainable development. Therefore, CiteScore ought not to be considered the only measure. Aside from CiteScore, researchers should consider whether the publication can convey research to the appropriate academics and accelerate the relevant research field development.

Country and research institute analysis

Table 4 presents the top 15 most prolific nations facilitating the increase of sustainability performance studies across the globe. Approximately 38% of the international research were from the United States and Australia, revealing that both nations are pivotal for developing sustainability performance studies. The United States was the leading nation with 867 articles, covering 26% of the overall articles across the world. With one-half of the United States’ overall articles, Australia was the second most prolific nation. However, Oregon State University’s total publication (TPi) was comparable to that of the University of Queensland, albeit slightly lower than that of Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. As a result, having the most productive academic institution may not be synonymous with being the most productive country.

Table 4. The top 15 most prolific nations and academic institutions in sustainability performance publications.

RankCountryTPcS.C.P. (%)The most prolific academic
institute
TPi
1United States86768.9Oregon State University25
2Australia39865.6The University of Queensland25
3United Kingdom37348.5University College London10
4China27337.0Sichuan University10
5Malaysia18766.3Universiti Teknologi Malaysia26
6Canada17361.9University of British Columbia Okanagan16
7Germany17249.4Technical University of Berlin9
8India16473.2National Institute of Technology Tiruchirappalli10
9Brazil16061.9Universidade de São Paulo24
10Italy15658.3Politecnico di Milano8
11Netherlands12343.9Wageningen University & Research15
12Spain11451.8Universidad de Zaragoza8
13France10631.1AgroParisTech5
14Sweden8650.0Chalmers University of Technology14
15Turkey8565.9˙Istanbul Teknik Üniversitesi8

*Note = Abbreviation: TPc - Total Publications of a Given Country/ TPi - Total Publications of a Given Academic Institution/S.C.P. - Single-Country Publications

Besides, only India (73.2%) had over 2/3 single-country publications (S.C.P.) among the 15 countries. This indicated that India has a more vital intra-country collaboration than other countries. Additionally, China was the nation with the least S.C.P. with 37.0%, in which 101 out of 273 articles were associated with several affiliations from 43 diverse nations. Furthermore, China has more total publications than India, which indicates that international collaboration should be a focus. As shown in Figure 3, outcomes of co-authorship revealed that America was the most affiliated nation, linked to 53 nations/territories. Moreover, the United States produced the most publications, with the total number of publications ranking first. Therefore, international collaboration might contribute to producing more publications. The government needs to formulate flexible and steady policies to sustain transnational collaborations.

7c6413cf-e9e3-4403-bdd2-b56e19c979d8_figure3.gif

Figure 3. A screenshot of a bibliometric map produced on the foundation of co-authorships via net visualization mode.

The URL below can be utilized to open Figure 3 in VOSviewer39: https://bit.ly/3vZdPU7

Co-occurrence (author keywords)

The analyses of the knowledge development track in the study field can assist scholars in comprehensively capturing the development trend of the study field, forecasting the developmental tendency, and offering scholars more research targets. In past research, certain scholars utilized quantitative computation on the foundation of the occurrence frequency or co-occurrence frequency of words or phrases, which delineate the study. As per the association strength between topic words, they clustered them and drew a net of subject topics in diverse periods’ atlases to identify the development path of the study field38.

As shown in Figure 4, there are 7634 author keywords documented, amongst which 6006 (78.7%) were merely utilized once, 782 essential words (10.2%) were utilized twice, and 276 (3.6%) were utilized three times. After re-labelling synonymical single words and congenerical phrases, 420 keywords reached the liminal value of minimal five occurrences for VOSviewer. In the map, the term ‘sustainability’ was the most popular keyword with 878 occurrences and 337 associations with other keywords. In addition, our team discovered the utilization of general terms like “organizational sustainability” (8 occurrences, 12 links), “corporate sustainability” (129 occurrences, 112 links) and ‘triple bottom line’ (22 occurrences, 29 links).

7c6413cf-e9e3-4403-bdd2-b56e19c979d8_figure4.gif

Figure 4. A screen shot of the bibliometric map produced on the foundation of author keywords co-occurrence with overlay visualization mode.

The URL below can be utilized to open Figure 4 in VOSviewer39: https://bit.ly/ 3bsitk4.

The critical concept of sustainable development includes three pivotal components, including society, environment, and economic development41. In Figure 4, keywords associated with ‘social sustainability, ‘economic sustainability’ and ‘environmental sustainability’ were repeated 31, 69 and 70 times, respectively. This result suggests that the researchers overlooked the social sustainability aspect. Although, some researchers indicated that corporations and commercial activities shouldn’t merely highlight the economy-wise sustainable development. The other aspects should be taken into consideration as well because they are equally essential4244.

Keywords that address challenges within sustainability performance by inner or outer factors were discovered as well, e.g., ‘green supply chain’ was reported 21 times and often cooccurred with ‘reverse logistics’. Furthermore, green manufacturing, green purchasing and green packaging, three elements of the green supply chain, were identified as the factor for influencing reverse logistics45. But there have been no academics researching the effect of other elements of the green supply chain on reverse logistics, which provided a research gap for future study. On the other hand, material flow analysis is the most popular research topic among the top ten contributing authors. Nevertheless, no streams of keyword occurrence were observed in the review, which linked material flow analysis and sustainable development performance.

Distribution of sustainability performance based on major applications

As per the number of research and author keyword occurrences, positive associations were discovered between the outputs of the subtheme search and the centric theme search. For example, it is shown that the manufacturing industry was the most commonly seen application with 1149 papers in Scopus and 28 occurrences in VOSviewer. This was followed by the construction industry (700 papers and 21 occurrences), food industry (593 papers and 11 occurrences), automotive industry (371 papers and 7 occurrences), agriculture industry (362 papers and 7 occurrences), and oil and gas industry (246 papers and 6 occurrences).

In fact, the manufacturing sector is a cornerstone of economic development, which is pivotal for economy-wise sustainability, and it serves as a major contributor to the Gross Domestic Product (G.D.P.), employment rates and export percentage of countries around the world. However, the rapid development of manufacturing has caused substantial waste, overuse of various resources and overconsumption of energy46. Also, achieving sustainability performance helps manufacturing organizations to attain a competitive advantage in the market that is moving towards a greener economy and achieving significant financial gains while attracting customers to assure long term profitability47. As a result, an increasing number of academics and practitioners are incorporating sustainability into the manufacturing industry, and the manufacturing industry has become the focus of research.

Furthermore, Figure 5 showed that most publications related to the manufacturing industry, construction industry, food industry, automotive industry and agriculture industry came from the U.S.A. except on the agriculture industry. Australia is the primary focus of research into the agriculture industry’s sustainability performance. The reason for it could be linked to Australia’s economy and culture. The agricultural sector is vital for Australia’s economic and cultural development. In this country, about 65% of overall production is exported, which accounts for about 14% of the overall exportation value in Australia48. Also, in general, the U.K. was amongst the top five nations that publish research on all sustainability performance applications. Other nations like China, Australia, Malaysia, India, Netherlands and Italy were listed in diverse applications of sustainability performance and merely once.

7c6413cf-e9e3-4403-bdd2-b56e19c979d8_figure5.gif

Figure 5. Five nations with the most publications on the selected sustainability performance major applications.

Limitations of the study

The outcome may not cover all sustainability performance-associated research on Scopus by restricting the search of “sustainability performance” within titles, abstracts, and content. That’s because certain scholars didn’t refer to their systems as sustainability performance but instead utilized diverse terms. Research in the future should contrast the outputs from several databases like Scopus and Web of Sciences. The search outcomes from Web of Science, for example, automatically demonstrate the most popular research via the ‘hot paper’ function, which remains absent in Scopus. Such a function demonstrates that pivotal research was recognized quickly after publication, which is reflected via a fast and remarkable citation number. Utilizing bibliometric analyses via several data sources will facilitate more systematic research.

Conclusions

The present paper aims to help researchers and practitioners grasp the research tendency in sustainability performance and find the underlying orientations for further studies. As per academic database outputs, bibliometric analyses are a mechanical method to grasp the international research tendency in certain study fields. Such a method can distinguish a bibliometric analysis report from a review study mainly aimed at summarizing the latest development, problems, and future orientations of specific topics. Although there are certain limitations, this research is still vital for sustainability performance researchers.

Firstly, the outcomes herein reveal that the sustainability performance field has witnessed remarkable advancement recently. Publications have been increasing over the past ten years and are anticipated to increase progressively. Secondly, according to the findings of this study, the academics who focus on sustainability performance-related research are all university professors. Moreover, when publishing the article, the authors should not only consider the CiteScore but also take into account if the journal can deliver research to appropriate readers and facilitate the development of the research area. Furthermore, the study identified countries and academic institutions with solid international and internal cooperation (e.g., U.S.A. and India). Those international and internal collaborations are a treasure for scholars to expand their studies. However, the fact that some countries and regions lack international collaboration and specialized policies to support collaboration should be noted.

Finally, this paper found the research trend for academics. There are three elements of sustainability performance, however, social sustainability has been somewhat overlooked, and this should be noted. Likewise, the association of material flow with sustainable development performance, which offers future orientations for scholars, practitioners and investigators in future studies on sustainability performance, ought to be extensively researched. Moreover, merely co-authorship and cooccurrence analyses were completed via the VOSviewer. Thereby, more tools, like co-citation and bibliographical coupling of the program, can be utilized. Because sustainability performance is important across the globe, the sustainability performance research boundaries are expected to expand progressively, and more thrilling topics will definitely emerge.

Data availability

Underlying data

Dryad: An Exploration of Trends and Future Directions in Sustainability Performance. https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.8kprr4xqx49.

This project contains the following underlying data:

  • Scopus.csv (articles from 1997–2010).

  • Scopus_(1).csv (articles from 2010–2021).

    [insert license statement].

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 1
VERSION 1 PUBLISHED 29 Jul 2022
Comment
Author details Author details
Competing interests
Grant information
Copyright
Download
 
Export To
metrics
Views Downloads
F1000Research - -
PubMed Central
Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.
- -
Citations
CITE
how to cite this article
Yang KH and Thoo AC. An exploration of trends and future directions in sustainability performance: A bibliometric analysis of Scopus database [version 1; peer review: 4 approved with reservations]. F1000Research 2022, 11:864 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.121838.1)
NOTE: If applicable, it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
track
receive updates on this article
Track an article to receive email alerts on any updates to this article.

Open Peer Review

Current Reviewer Status: ?
Key to Reviewer Statuses VIEW
ApprovedThe paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approvedFundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions
Version 1
VERSION 1
PUBLISHED 29 Jul 2022
Views
5
Cite
Reviewer Report 07 May 2024
Raghavendran Sivasubramanian, Hamad Bin Khalifa University (HBKU), Ar-Rayyan, Qatar 
Approved with Reservations
VIEWS 5
Verdict: Accepted, with modifications.
This article reviews the updates on sustainability practices and points the directions that the existing journals have progressed since 1997.
The reviewer has reservations on this article.
  1. This paper is
... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
Sivasubramanian R. Reviewer Report For: An exploration of trends and future directions in sustainability performance: A bibliometric analysis of Scopus database [version 1; peer review: 4 approved with reservations]. F1000Research 2022, 11:864 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.133743.r269824)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
Views
7
Cite
Reviewer Report 26 Jan 2024
Qaisar Iqbal, King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals, Dhahran, Saudi Arabia 
Approved with Reservations
VIEWS 7
I appreciate your hard work. Yet, I have noted a few discrepancies and would recommend you fix all these in the revised draft.

In the draft, it is written "To include only papers within the analysis time ... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
Iqbal Q. Reviewer Report For: An exploration of trends and future directions in sustainability performance: A bibliometric analysis of Scopus database [version 1; peer review: 4 approved with reservations]. F1000Research 2022, 11:864 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.133743.r211468)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
Views
6
Cite
Reviewer Report 22 Dec 2023
Norsiah Hami, Associate Professor of Technology Management, Universiti Utara Malaysia, Sintok, Kedah, Malaysia 
Approved with Reservations
VIEWS 6
In overall, this manuscript is good and interesting. However, there is no discussion on the validation process of the instrument or data. In addition, the argument that "there have been no academics researching the effect of other elements of the ... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
Hami N. Reviewer Report For: An exploration of trends and future directions in sustainability performance: A bibliometric analysis of Scopus database [version 1; peer review: 4 approved with reservations]. F1000Research 2022, 11:864 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.133743.r228113)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
Views
12
Cite
Reviewer Report 16 Oct 2023
Francisco Jesús Gálvez-Sánchez, Department of Financial Economics and Accounting, University of Granada, Granada, Spain 
Approved with Reservations
VIEWS 12
Dear authors, I appreciate the opportunity to review the manuscript entitled "An exploration of trends and future directions in sustainability performance: A bibliometric analysis of Scopus database”, which proposes a bibliometric analysis of scientific production on sustainability performance, based on ... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
Gálvez-Sánchez FJ. Reviewer Report For: An exploration of trends and future directions in sustainability performance: A bibliometric analysis of Scopus database [version 1; peer review: 4 approved with reservations]. F1000Research 2022, 11:864 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.133743.r199402)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 1
VERSION 1 PUBLISHED 29 Jul 2022
Comment
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Approved - the paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations - A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approved - fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions
Sign In
If you've forgotten your password, please enter your email address below and we'll send you instructions on how to reset your password.

The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.

Email address not valid, please try again

You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.

You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.

Code not correct, please try again
Email us for further assistance.
Server error, please try again.