ALL Metrics
-
Views
-
Downloads
Get PDF
Get XML
Cite
Export
Track
Research Article
Revised

Turmeric extract gel and honey in post-cesarean section wound healing: A preliminary study

[version 2; peer review: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations]
PUBLISHED 20 Feb 2024
Author details Author details
OPEN PEER REVIEW
REVIEWER STATUS

Abstract

Background

Delivery by cesarean section (SC) increases the risk of a surgical site infection (SSI). Therapy from health services and complementary therapy reduce the risk of infection and accelerate the wound-healing process. This study compared wound healing after SC with a turmeric extract gel and original Trigona honey.

Methods

Female white rats (Rattus novergicus) with pre- and post-testing and a control group were included in this experiment, which was conducted in June-July 2022. The test animals were 56 female white rats, 2-4 months old, weighing 150–350 g. The treatment group was divided into three subgroups with application of 50% and 75% turmeric extract gel and Trigona honey. The turmeric was given twice daily, and the honey was divided into two applications of twice a day and once a day. Wounds were assessed using the Reeda Scale.

Results

The fastest wound healing occurred in the group given Trigona honey twice daily. Redness, ecchymosis, and edema disappeared in this group on day 9 (score 0), and granulation tissue formed on day 9. The group that was administered 50% and 75% turmeric gel extract and Trigona honey once a day healed by days 12 and 15, respectively; all three of these interventions were better than the control group.

Conclusions

Administering Trigona honey twice daily was more effective for accelerating wound healing than the 50% or 75% turmeric extract gel. Original Trigona honey has the potential to be a post-SC wound healing agent.

Keywords

Honey Gel,  Trigona, Turmeric Extract Gel, and Wound Healing Process

Revised Amendments from Version 1

We answered all relevant reviewers' comments, major changes were made to the table, we added statistical analysis as recommended by the reviewer.

To read any peer review reports and author responses for this article, follow the "read" links in the Open Peer Review table.

Introduction

Delivery by Cesarean section (SC) increases the risk of surgical site infection (SSI), which can prolong the hospital stay and increase anxiety. Sepsis can follow if the infection is not resolved. The choice of surgical technique and antibiotic reduces this risk; however, particular risk factors, such as anemia, obesity, hypertension, and parity, continue to make SSI extremely prevalent.1,2

Staphylococcus aureus is the most prevalent pathogenic bacteria in patients with SSI, and 9.8% of these bacteria are resistant to methicillin. Other bacteria include Klebsiella pneumoniae, Escherichia coli, and Enterococcus faecalis.3,4 Antibiotics, such as azithromycin, reduce the risk of SSI, although some studies suggest that the long-term effects of using antibiotics are unclear.5

Complementary therapy based on natural ingredients has received attention because consumers tend to prefer natural ingredients.6,7 There is a scarcity of published research on the use of herbal medicine for treating surgical site infections. The local wisdom of Indonesian people, especially those in South Sulawesi, a province in the eastern part of Indonesia, and various studies have shown that honey and turmeric have anti-inflammatory activities and reduce the expression of proinflammatory cytokines. Treating wounds with honey significantly increases angiogenesis, re-epithelialization, and the formation of granulation tissue. The phenolic and flavonoid compounds in honey and turmeric play a role in wound healing.79

Turmeric is a yellow rhizome that is often used as a cooking spice. Turmeric contains active compounds, such as curcuminoids and essential oils. Curcuminoids consist of curcumin, desmethoxycumin, and bisdesmethoxycurcumin.10 The mechanism of action of turmeric extract on wounds is to inhibit cyclooxygenase (COX-2) and lipoxygenase, which play roles in the inflammatory stage to accelerate tissue re-epithelialization, cell proliferation, and collagen synthesis.11

The antibacterial activity of honey is exhibited by components such as H2O2, glucose, and several polyphenols. The phenolic components inhibit bacterial growth through pro-oxidative activity by increasing H2O2 activity. The acidic pH of honey (3.2–4.5) also functions as an antibacterial due to the presence of gluconate acid from the oxidation of glucose, which creates an acidic environment. The flavonoid and phenolic components are anti-inflammatory and suppress the activity of the proinflammatory cytokines, such as COX-2 and inducible nitric oxide synthase. Proline, arginine, methionine, and glycine contribute to the formation of collagen and fibroblasts during wound healing.8 Honey has been clinically applied successfully to treat elderly wounds that do not heal after homecare services. Scar tissue has also been treated successfully at the preclinical trial stage. Significant changes in angiogenic biomarkers occur, such as hypoxia-inducible factor-1α, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), and VEGF receptor-II. Honey is also effective on diabetic wounds, burns, pressure sores, and venous and arterial ulcers.1214

Turmeric gel and honey have been preclinically tested on post-SC wounds and produced satisfactory results. Researchers tested turmeric gel and applied pure honey to general wounds. We continued this research on more specific wounds, such as postoperative SC wounds in experimental animals. The turmeric was formulated in 50% and 75% gel products, whereas the honey used was 100% pure honey from Apis trigona bees used once or twice a day. Both were made with local ingredients from South Sulawesi Province, Indonesia.

This study used female Wistar strain Rattus norvegicus rats because they have a gene structure and physiology similar to humans. We compared wound healing, such as redness, swelling, ecchymosis, edema, pus, and tissue granulation, between the turmeric extract gel and pure Trigona honey. This study will hopefully become the basis for clinical trials to prevent SSI in post-SC wounds.

Methods

Research design and ethics approval

This research was an experimental pre-post-test laboratory study with female rats (R. novergicus) using a control group. The study utilized female Wistar strain Rattus norvegicus rats due of their genetic and physiological resemblance to humans. This research received approval from the ethical clearance commission of Hasanuddin University Makassar (number 4883/UN4.14.1/TP.01.02/2022).

Research setting

The first stage of the research was carried out at the Hasanuddin University Biopharmaceutical Laboratory to manufacture the turmeric gel extract and the honey. The husbandry and treatment of the experimental animals were carried out at the Animal Laboratory, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Hasanuddin University Makassar. This study was conducted during June–July 2022.

Research subjects

The testing was carried out on 56 female white rats. The inclusion criteria for the study were female Wistar white rats, 2–4 months of age, weighing 150–350 g in good health (actively moving, fur not dull, not shedding, eyes clear, and nimble). The exclusion criteria were illness and inactivity throughout the study.

Thirty-one rats did not meet the inclusion criteria (28 rats under 150 g, and three were not active and ill), so 25 rats (n=5/group) were used in the study.

Research procedure

All efforts were undertaken to minimize the suffering of the animals. Wounds were created after shaving the fur on the part to be cut. The rats were anesthetized intraperitoneally with ketamine (80 mg/kg) before wounding to relieve pain and prevent excessive movement. The area to be cut was marked, and a 2 cm-long incision was made to penetrate the peritoneum. Five groups were prepared:

  • 1. Turmeric gel at 50% and 75% concentrations were applied to the wound using sterile cotton every morning and evening

  • 2. Trigona honey gel was applied twice daily (0.13 mg) (morning and evening) or once daily (0.064 mg) in the morning to the respective subgroups

  • 3. Control, without intervention

The wound healing was monitored by observing moisture, redness, edema, pus, and granulation tissue in the wound (Reeda Scale). The rats were euthanized after closing the intrathoracic transection of the great vessels and heart.15

Data analysis

Data were grouped according to purpose and type, and descriptive statistical methods were used. The characteristics of the basic data are described to see improvements and no statistics were used. The score entered in the table is the average score (mean) which is calculated by adding up all the female Wistar white rat wound scores in each group, then dividing it by the number of group members. The score was calculated using Microsoft Excel.

Research results

Table 1 shows that the groups given the 50% and 75% turmeric extract gel had a redness score of 0 (redness disappeared) on day 12 post-intervention. The groups that were given Trigona honey twice daily and once daily had scores of 0 (redness disappeared) 3 days earlier than the group that was given turmeric, which was on day 9.

Table 1.

Redness score of the wounds in the turmeric extract gel and honey groups.

Intervention GroupRedness Score of the wounds
day
036912151821p-valuea
Mean ± SD
50% Turmeric extract gelscore1.0 ± 0.001.0 ± 0.001.0 ± 0.001.0 ± 0.000.0 ± 0.000.0 ± 0.000.0 ± 0.000.0 ± 0.000.000a
75% Turmeric extract gelscore1.0 ± 0.001.0 ± 0.001.0 ± 0.001.0 ± 0.000.0 ± 0.000.0 ± 0.000.0 ± 0.000.0 ± 0.000.000a
Trigona twice a dayscore1.0 ± 0.001.0 ± 0.001.0 ± 0.000.0 ± 0.000.0 ± 0.000.0 ± 0.000.0 ± 0.000.0 ± 0.000.000a
Trigona once a dayscore1.0 ± 0.001.0 ± 0.001.0 ± 0.000.0 ± 0.000.0 ± 0.000.0 ± 0.000.0 ± 0.000.0 ± 0.000.000a
Controlscore1.0 ± 0.001.0 ± 0.001.0 ± 0.001.0 ± 0.000.6 ± 0.540.0 ± 0.000.0 ± 0.000.0 ± 0.000.000a
p-valueb1.000b1.000b1.000b0.000b0.011b1.000b1.000b1.000b

a Friedman Test.

b Kruskal-wallis Test.

Statistical analysis showed that all intervention groups experienced significant changes in redness scores based on day. Analysis between groups showed that significant differences in scores occurred on day 9 and day 12. On days 15, 18 and 21, redness was no longer detected in the intervention and control groups (Table 1).

Table 2 shows that none of the groups administered the 50% or 75% turmeric extract gel scored 0 (ecchymosis disappeared) on day 15 post-intervention. The group given Trigona honey twice daily had a score of 0 (ecchymosis disappeared) on day 9, whereas the group given Trigona honey once daily had a score of 0 (ecchymosis disappeared) on day 15.

Table 2.

Ecchymosis scores of the wounds in the turmeric extract gel and honey groups.

Intervention GroupEcchymosis Score of the wounds
day
036912151821p-valuea
Mean ± SD
50% Turmeric extract gelscore3.0 ± 0.003.0 ± 0.001.6 ± 0.541.2 ± 0.441.0 ± 0.000.0 ± 0.000.0 ± 0.000.0 ± 0.000.000a
75% Turmeric extract gelscore3.0 ± 0.003.0 ± 0.001.4 ± 0.541.2 ± 0.441.0 ± 0.000.0 ± 0.000.0 ± 0.000.0 ± 0.000.000a
Trigona twice a dayscore3.0 ± 0.002.0 ± 0.001.0 ± 0.000.0 ± 0.000.0 ± 0.000.0 ± 0.000.0 ± 0.000.0 ± 0.000.000a
Trigona once a dayscore3.0 ± 0.002.0 ± 0.002.0 ± 0.001.0 ± 0.001.0 ± 0.000.0 ± 0.000.0 ± 0.000.0 ± 0.000.000a
Controlscore3.0 ± 0.003.0 ± 0.001.6 ± 0.541.4 ± 0.541.2 ± 0.441.0 ± 0.000.0 ± 0.000.0 ± 0.000.000a
p-valueb1.000b0.000b0.038b0.002b0.000b0.000b1.000b1.000b

a Friedman Test.

b Kruskal-wallis Test.

Statistical analysis showed that all intervention groups experienced significant changes in ecchymosis scores based on day. Analysis between groups showed that significant differences in scores occurred from day 3 to day 15. On days 18 and 21 there were no significant differences between all groups (score 0 for all groups) (Table 2).

Table 3 shows that the groups administered the 50% or 75% turmeric extract gel had scores of 0 (edema disappeared) on day 12 post intervention. The group given Trigona honey twice daily had a score of 0 (redness disappeared) 3 days earlier than the group given turmeric on day 9 (edema disappeared).

Table 3.

Edema score of the wounds in the turmeric extract gel and honey groups.

Intervention GroupScore Edema of the wounds
day
036912151821p-valuea
Mean ± SD
50% Turmeric extract gelscore1.0 ± 0.001.0 ± 0.001.0 ± 0.001.0 ± 0.000.0 ± 0.000.0 ± 0.000.0 ± 0.000.0 ± 0.000.000a
75% Turmeric extract gelscore1.0 ± 0.001.0 ± 0.001.0 ± 0.001.0 ± 0.000.0 ± 0.000.0 ± 0.000.0 ± 0.000.0 ± 0.000.000a
Trigona twice a dayscore1.0 ± 0.001.0 ± 0.001.0 ± 0.000.0 ± 0.000.0 ± 0.000.0 ± 0.000.0 ± 0.000.0 ± 0.000.000a
Trigona once a dayscore1.0 ± 0.001.0 ± 0.001.0 ± 0.001.0 ± 0.000.0 ± 0.000.0 ± 0.000.0 ± 0.000.0 ± 0.000.000a
Controlscore1.0 ± 0.001.0 ± 0.001.0 ± 0.001.0 ± 0.000.6 ± 0.540.0 ± 0.000.0 ± 0.000.0 ± 0.000.000a
p-valueb1.000b1.000b1.000b0.000b0.011b1.000b1.000b1.000b

a Friedman Test.

b Kruskal-wallis Test.

Statistical analysis showed that all intervention groups experienced significant changes in edema scores based on day. Analysis between groups showed that significant differences in scores occurred starting on day 9 and day 12. On days 15, 18 and 21 there were no significant differences between all groups (score 0 for all groups) (Table 3).

Table 4 shows that the control group displayed pus on day 12 and scored 0 (pus disappeared) on day 15 post-intervention, whereas none of the other groups experienced pus in a wound.

Table 4.

Pus score of the wounds in turmeric extract gel and honey groups.

Intervention GroupPus Score of the wounds
day
036912151821p-valuea
Mean ± SD
50% Turmeric extract gelscore0.0 ± 0.000.0 ± 0.000.0 ± 0.000.0 ± 0.000.0 ± 0.000.0 ± 0.000.0 ± 0.000.0 ± 0.00NA
75% Turmeric extract gelscore0.0 ± 0.000.0 ± 0.000.0 ± 0.000.0 ± 0.000.0 ± 0.000.0 ± 0.000.0 ± 0.000.0 ± 0.00NA
Trigona twice a dayscore0.0 ± 0.000.0 ± 0.000.0 ± 0.000.0 ± 0.000.0 ± 0.000.0 ± 0.000.0 ± 0.000.0 ± 0.00NA
Trigona once a dayscore0.0 ± 0.000.0 ± 0.000.0 ± 0.000.0 ± 0.000.0 ± 0.000.0 ± 0.000.0 ± 0.000.0 ± 0.00NA
Controlscore0.0 ± 0.000.0 ± 0.000.0 ± 0.000.0 ± 0.001.0 ± 0.000.0 ± 0.000.0 ± 0.000.0 ± 0.000.000a
p-valueb1.000b1.000b1.000b1.000b0.000b1.000b1.000b1.000b

a Friedman Test.

b Kruskal-wallis Test.

Table 5 shows that granulation occurred the quickest (score 2) in the group given Trigona honey twice daily, whereas the group given 50% or 70% turmeric gel extract experienced granulation (score 2.0) on day 15; the longest time to granulation was the control group on day 18.

Table 5.

Granulation tissue score in the wound of the turmeric extract gel and honey groups.

Intervention GroupGranulation Score of the wounds
day
036912151821p-valuea
Mean ± SD
50% Turmeric extract gelscore0.0 ± 0.000.6 ± 0.541.0 ± 0.001.2 ± 0.441.8 ± 0.442.0 ± 0.000.0 ± 0.000.0 ± 0.000.000a
75% Turmeric extract gelscore0.0 ± 0.000.6 ± 0.541.0 ± 0.001.4 ± 0.541.8 ± 0.442.0 ± 0.000.0 ± 0.000.0 ± 0.000.000a
Trigona twice a dayscore0.0 ± 0.001.2 ± 0.441.8 ± 0.442.0 ± 0.000.0 ± 0.001.8 ± 0.440.0 ± 0.000.0 ± 0.000.000a
Trigona once a dayscore0.0 ± 0.000.0 ± 0.001.0 ± 0.001.2 ± 0.441.8 ± 0.442.0 ± 0.000.0 ± 0.002.0 ± 0.000.000a
Controlscore0.0 ± 0.000.4 ± 0.540.8 ± 0.441.0 ± 0.001.4 ± 0.541.8 ± 0.442.0 ± 0.000.0 ± 0.000.000a
p-valueb1.000b0.027b0.003b0.000b0.003b0.000b0.000b1.000b

a Friedman Test.

b Kruskal-wallis Test.

Statistical analysis showed that all intervention groups experienced significant changes in granulation tissue scores based on day. Analysis between groups showed that significant differences in scores occurred from day 3 to day 18. On day 21 there were no significant differences between all groups (Table 5).

Discussion

Drugs have been used to speed up the wound-healing process. Wound healing is a natural repair process for tissue injury involving inflammatory mediators, blood cells, the extracellular matrix, and parenchymal cells.16 The drugs used in traditional medicines are derived from plants and animals.17 Some of the plants used to treat wounds in mice include turmeric and honey.18

The present study showed that administering Trigona honey twice daily accelerated wound healing based on redness, moisture, edema, granulation tissue, and scabs in the wound compared with the 50% and 75% turmeric gel extract groups (Tables 25). Trigona honey administered twice daily did not result in wound edema (Table 4). Honeys have different chemical compositions, biological properties, and effects depending on the environmental, geographical, and nutritional factors of the plant pollen collected.17 Trigona honey increases angiogenic activity, which is very important during wound healing and accelerates the formation of granulation tissue and re-epithelialization of the skin. Honey has antioxidant, antibacterial, and anti-inflammatory properties.18 The flavonoid content in honey increases angiogenesis; thus, fibrosis and collagen formation increase. Flavonoids also have antibacterial, antioxidant, and anti-inflammatory properties.19

The results of this study indicate that administering Trigona honey twice daily led to a faster healing process than once daily; this agreed with research conducted by Takzaree et al., who reported that applying honey to wounds twice daily increases healing, shortens the inflammatory process, and increases the granulation rate.20

Turmeric extracts in 50% and 75% gels can be used as an alternative treatment because they accelerate wound healing, although not as quickly as Trigona honey (Tables 25). This is due to the curcumin compounds with antimicrobial, antioxidant, and anti-inflammatory properties that accelerate re-epithelialization, proliferation, and collagen synthesis.2123 Turmeric rhizome extracts have antibacterial activity. Turmeric leaf oil at various concentrations inhibits the mycelial growth of Aspergillus flavus and Aspergillus parasiticus. Turmeric leaf oil is effective against the antibiotic-resistant bacterium Escherichia coli, and the oil from Curcuma longa leaves has antioxidant properties.2325 The turmeric rhizome is prepared as a gel for topical application. A gel is a semisolid system that provides a cool and soothing feeling to the skin with a high water content so it increases hydration in the stratum corneum and dries easily to form a film layer.11 The results of this study indicate that the turmeric extract gel and Trigona honey can be used as alternative treatments for post-CS wounds. However, further research is needed on humans to determine the appropriate dose.

Author contributions

ANU, SAR, RFY, MNK, AGR, amf ZAN contributed to the literature review, data extraction from various databases, conceptualisation, development of the economic models on Microsoft Excel Software, formal analysis, findings interpretation, and manuscript writing. All authors approved the final version of the paper.

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 2
VERSION 2 PUBLISHED 01 Sep 2023
Comment
Author details Author details
Competing interests
Grant information
Copyright
Download
 
Export To
metrics
Views Downloads
F1000Research - -
PubMed Central
Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.
- -
Citations
CITE
how to cite this article
Nilawati Usman A, Sartini S, Yulianti R et al. Turmeric extract gel and honey in post-cesarean section wound healing: A preliminary study [version 2; peer review: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations]. F1000Research 2024, 12:1095 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.134011.2)
NOTE: If applicable, it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
track
receive updates on this article
Track an article to receive email alerts on any updates to this article.

Open Peer Review

Current Reviewer Status: ?
Key to Reviewer Statuses VIEW
ApprovedThe paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approvedFundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions
Version 2
VERSION 2
PUBLISHED 20 Feb 2024
Revised
Views
7
Cite
Reviewer Report 29 May 2024
Evelyn Asante-Kwatia, Department of Pharmacognosy, Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Health Sciences, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ashanti Region, Ghana 
Approved
VIEWS 7
All methods used are scientifically valid; and analytical tools for results analysis as technically accurate. The authors have clearly described all protocols in detail to make them reproducible. Ethical approvals were sought for the study and provided. The manuscript ... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
Asante-Kwatia E. Reviewer Report For: Turmeric extract gel and honey in post-cesarean section wound healing: A preliminary study [version 2; peer review: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations]. F1000Research 2024, 12:1095 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.162529.r275078)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
Views
8
Cite
Reviewer Report 19 Mar 2024
Arfa Nasrine, Department of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmaceutical Sciences Dayananda Sagar University, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India 
Approved
VIEWS 8
Can be accepted

References
1. Nilawati Usman A, Sartini S, Yulianti R, Kamsurya M, et al.: Turmeric extract gel and ... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
Nasrine A. Reviewer Report For: Turmeric extract gel and honey in post-cesarean section wound healing: A preliminary study [version 2; peer review: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations]. F1000Research 2024, 12:1095 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.162529.r252100)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
Version 1
VERSION 1
PUBLISHED 01 Sep 2023
Views
16
Cite
Reviewer Report 31 Jan 2024
Arfa Nasrine, Department of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmaceutical Sciences Dayananda Sagar University, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India 
Approved with Reservations
VIEWS 16
Title: Review of Manuscript - "Turmeric extract gel and honey in post-cesarean section wound healing: A preliminary study"

Overall Impression:
The manuscript presents an interesting study on the use of turmeric extract gel and Trigona honey for ... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
Nasrine A. Reviewer Report For: Turmeric extract gel and honey in post-cesarean section wound healing: A preliminary study [version 2; peer review: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations]. F1000Research 2024, 12:1095 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.147035.r232732)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
Views
29
Cite
Reviewer Report 27 Nov 2023
Maulana Yusuf Alkandahri, Universitas Buana Perjuangan Karawang, Karawang Regency, West Java, Indonesia 
Approved with Reservations
VIEWS 29
  1. Please complete all your bio-assay with completed validation methods (Please read https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpba.2022.114735, it maybe can help you to revise your manuscript (at least please calculate Z factor of your methods). Without validation data, the reported results maybe
... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
Alkandahri MY. Reviewer Report For: Turmeric extract gel and honey in post-cesarean section wound healing: A preliminary study [version 2; peer review: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations]. F1000Research 2024, 12:1095 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.147035.r224741)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 2
VERSION 2 PUBLISHED 01 Sep 2023
Comment
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Approved - the paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations - A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approved - fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions
Sign In
If you've forgotten your password, please enter your email address below and we'll send you instructions on how to reset your password.

The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.

Email address not valid, please try again

You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.

You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.

Code not correct, please try again
Email us for further assistance.
Server error, please try again.