ALL Metrics
-
Views
-
Downloads
Get PDF
Get XML
Cite
Export
Track
Study Protocol

Assessment and comparison of the sensitivity and specificity of sickling and haemoglobin electrophoresis in haemolytic anaemia patients: A study protocol

[version 1; peer review: 1 approved with reservations, 1 not approved]
PUBLISHED 13 Sep 2023
Author details Author details
OPEN PEER REVIEW
REVIEWER STATUS

This article is included in the Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research collection.

Abstract

The present protocol will compare haemoglobin electrophoresis with sickling test, evaluating sensitivity, specificity, positive predicted value and negative predicted value of haemolytic anaemia patients. Haemoglobin electrophoresis is the confirmation test for sickle cell anaemia. Sickle cell anaemia is a type of haemolytic anaemia where red blood cells (RBC)’s biconcave form does not enable the best possible respiratory exchange. In haemolytic anaemia, EDTA is used to examine the peripheral smear stained with Giemsa stain. Peripheral smear shows polychromatic neutrophils, nucleated RBCs (Red blood cell) and fragmented RBCs. In haemolytic anaemia, patients have decreased haemoglobin (Hb) levels. In sickle cell disease (SCD), anaemia is brought about by a change in the DNA sequence of cells in the Hb beta-globin chain. Screening of the sickling test is done by using sodium metabisulfite to assess the shape of cells. Confirmation test of Hb electrophoresis on cellulose acetate paper uses band detection. This study will aim to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of Hb electrophoresis with the sickling test utilizing quantifiable investigation. The effectiveness of sensitivity and specificity, positive and negative predicted values, and overall course of action for the two techniques, Hb electrophoresis and sickling test, will be collected. This research will also give an overview of existing haemolytic anaemia literature.

Keywords

Hemolytic, Anemia, Electrophoresis, Sickling, Hemoglobin, sensitivity, specificity, Sickle cell

Introduction

Hereditary causes of haemolytic anaemia include defects in haemoglobin (Hb) protein chains, leading to a reduced production rate of one or more of the beta-globin chain of Hb. Almost 200 million people, or 3% of the world’s population, are thought to be affected, in addition to the about 150,000 affected people born per year.1

Sickle cell anaemia caused due to mutation of Hb beta chains. These cells transform the typical biconcave disc shape to a crescent, holly wreath, and other forms when the oxygen pressure is reduced. This process is known as sickling.2

The pathophysiology of sickle cell disease (SCD) depends on haemoglobin sickle (HbS) polymerization, which is caused by a reduced oxygen affinity. The formation of permanently sickle cells results from repeated polymerization and sickling of cells. Haemolytic anaemia is the outcome of this, which accelerates cell death and shortens the lifespan of cells by greater than 75%.3

The heterogeneous presentation of sickle cell disease has been classified into trait (normal haemoglobin and reticulocytes, unconjugated bilirubin<1 mg/dL), mild (Hb>11 g/dL, reticulocytes 3–6%, unconjugated bilirubin 1–2 mg/dL), moderate (Hb 8–12 g/dL, reticulocytes 6–10%, unconjugated bilirubin>2 mg/dL) and severe (Hb>8 g/dL, reticulocytes>10%, unconjugated bilirubin>3 mg/dL). In such a case, iron deficiency is seen as uncommon, and clinical practice typically avoids prescribing iron supplements to these patients. Worldwide, anaemia due to primarily caused by iron deficiency, particularly in children and adult women.4

In the reticuloendothelial system, haemolysis may occur intravascularly or extravascularly, or both. Poor deformability, which leads to capture and phagocytosis, antibody-mediated destruction through phagocytosis, or direct complement activation, fragmentation caused by the microthrombi, physical injury, oxidation, or cellular apoptosis are a few mechanisms of haemolysis. Acute anaemia, jaundice, haematuria, dyspnoea, tiredness, tachycardia, and potentially hypotension are all possible symptoms of haemolysis in patients. Laboratory test results indicate haemolysis when reticulocytosis, increased lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), increased unconjugated bilirubin and decreased haptoglobin levels are present.5

Youderian et al. noted that several proteins exist whose amino acid composition is entirely known, whose three-dimensional structure is known or determined by crystallography and for which a significant number of known amino acid substitutions are available for investigation. The vast amount of electrophoretic data currently available from surveys using the same electrophoretic approach may be calibrated using the findings.6

Peripheral blood smear helps diagnose haemolytic anaemia. Peripheral smear cells show polychromatic neutrophils, micro spherocytes, high reticulocyte count, nucleated and fragmented RBC.7 Identifying “subclinical” haemolysis early is crucial since it can progress abruptly and quickly.8 The early effects in haemolytic anaemia patients are protein deficiency and dysfunction of the muscle skeleton of protein is seen in sickling tests.9 In a previous study, the sodium dithionite, sodium metabisulfite and moist seal methods were employed. The tests were repeated on specimens harmful to sickling.10

When separating abnormal haemoglobins, cellulose acetate is a particularly good medium for routine use.11 The most prevalent haemolytic disorder includes HbS, foetal haemoglobin (HbF), and sickle cell trait (HbAS) which is not a haemolytic disorder but its carrier forms found via Hb electrophoresis; these are crucial for family counselling, which aims to address physiological support, behavioural and emotional issues associated with the condition.12 Hb electrophoresis is a special technique used to identify certain haemolytic anaemias due to thalassemia syndromes and abnormal structural HbS.13

Ali et al.,1 in 2011, conducted a study on Hb electrophoresis to diagnose hemoglobinopathies in hypochromic, microcytic, and sickle cell blood films. The study used Hb electrophoresis to analyse 80 blood samples from patients with suspected hemoglobinopathies. Seven participants (8.8%) had SCD (HbS), eight (10%) had sickle cell minor carrier status (HbAS), and 12 (15%) had sickle cell major (HbF) and thalassaemic significant (HbAF) types, respectively. Type 7 (8.8%) haemoglobin (HbA2) indicates mild thalassemia. However, 22 patients also had Hb electrophoresis results that were normal. Hb gel electrophoresis is an easy and suitable technique with alkaline pH (4.8 to 6.8) for the study of the inherited hemoglobinopathies.

Maroufa et al.,13 in 2002, conducted research on hemoglobinopathies and Hb electrophoresis in Kuwait. The research comprised 2386 Hb electrophoresis tests performed on persons of various ages. The study found that 561 patients had abnormal Hb genes. Patients with haematological and clinical characteristics suggestive of hemoglobinopathies or those with a positive family history should be the only ones eligible for the test.

Kohn conducted a study on the HbS separate on cellulose acetate paper. The study applying a continuous current of 0-2 to 3 milli ampere/cm width established a bridge gap of 5 to 6 cm and a potential gradient of 200 to 240 V. Depending on the type of separation needed, the electrophoretic run time ranges from 30 to 90 minutes; for HbF, for example, it takes around 90 minutes. However, exploratory studies using marker HbS are the most effective way to determine the ideal circumstances. On standard laboratory equipment, “high voltage electrophoresis” conditions, such as 100 V/cm, can be easily reached by delivering 300 V over a 3 cm bridge gap. With this method, a completely adequate separation can be attained in eight to 15 minutes. The small opening prevents nearly all overheating, which results in an abundant supply of buffer, a relatively short running period, and these factors. Iterative electrophoresis is used to separate the applied samples until it is successful. The ideal way to monitor the electrophoretic run is to observe the movement of the heterozygous marker haemoglobins, such as AS or AC. The cellulose acetate paper is dried or fixed when the separation is finished, much like with regular protein electrophoresis.11

Rationale

Haemolytic anaemia often accompanies underlying causes of various hemoglobinopathies. One of India’s main health problems is the prevalence of quantitative and qualitative haemoglobin abnormalities. As a result, it has become a serious public health issue.14

Haemolytic anaemia is characterized by excessive destruction of the RBCs in the central and peripheral circulation. The causes behind the excessive RBC destruction are attributed to either the extrinsic or the intrinsic defects that may be present in the RBC. Of all the screening tests used for screening cases of haemolytic anaemia, a sickling test is the most commonly used. However, this basic screening tests are plagued by a lot of disadvantages which may range from technical to human errors. On the other hand, Hb electrophoresis does not suffer from all these disadvantages and gives accurate results. The routine protocol followed in the diagnosis of haemolytic anaemia is to do a screening test first and then go for a confirmatory test, thus delaying the final diagnosis. The present protocol will aim to employ both these tests for the screening cases of haemolytic anaemia and compare their sensitivity and specificity with each other. Employing a definitive diagnostic test will greatly reduce delay in diagnosing cases of haemolytic anaemia.

Protocol

Objectives

  • 1. To evaluate the findings on peripheral blood smears that are suspicious for haemolytic anaemia.

  • 2. To screen for haemolytic anaemia by performing a sickling test.

  • 3. To determine the sickling test’s sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value.

  • 4. To screen for haemolytic anaemia by performing Hb electrophoresis.

  • 5. To calculate the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of Hb electrophoresis and sickling test.

  • 6. To compare the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of haemoglobin electrophoresis and sickling test.

Methods

Study design

This will be a cross-sectional study.

Study settings

The following study is a cross-sectional investigative study that will be conducted in the haematology division of the Department of Pathology, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College (JNMC), Sawangi (Meghe), Wardha, in collaboration with the Acharya Vinoba Bhave Rural Hospital (AVBRH), Sawangi (Meghe), Wardha, from 2023. This investigation will take place after Institutional Ethics Committee approves it and the patients give their written consent. A total sample size of 80 blood specimens will be collected in EDTA (ethylenediaminetetra acetic acid) tubes and collected in phlebotomy section.

Materials

The following two methods will be used for this study.

Sickling test method

The sickling test will be performed by inducing deoxygenation of the blood samples and observing the shape of the red blood cells under a microscope.15 The presence of sickle cells will be noted.

The steps for performing the sickling test are as follows:

A small sample of blood will be collected from the patient’s fingertip or, in some cases, from a vein using a syringe. Clean and dry test tubes will be selected for the test. The tube should be free of any moisture, as water can interfere with the test results. A drop of blood will be placed on a glass slide or a clean, dry surface. Then, using a pipette or a capillary tube, a small amount of sodium metabisulfite solution will be added to the blood. The mixture will be gently stirred to ensure thorough mixing. After mixing, the sample will be allowed to stand undisturbed for a few minutes. During this time, the normal red blood cells will retain their round shape, while any red blood cells containing sickle hemoglobin will undergo a characteristic change in shape. The sickle cells will form a crescent or sickle-like shape, which gives the test its name. The test results will be observed under a microscope or by visual inspection. If the blood contains a significant number of sickle cells, it indicates the presence of sickle cell disease or sickle cell trait (heterozygous carrier of the sickle cell gene). If there are no sickle cells or only a small number present, the test is considered negative.

Haemoglobin electrophoresis method

Samples for Hb electrophoresis:

Hemolysate will be prepared from blood in EDTA citrate.

Fresh or refrigerated samples will be used.

Buffer tank, cellulose acetate paper, micropipette or capillary.

Cellulose acetate strips will be soaked in a buffer solution, usually a Tris-glycine buffer, to prepare them for electrophoresis. This buffer establishes the pH and ionic conditions necessary for proper protein separation.

A few microliters of the patient’s plasma or a hemolysate (RBC disrupted to release their contents) will be applied to the cellulose acetate strip near one end. Care will be taken to ensure that the sample is evenly distributed and doesn’t overlap.

The prepared cellulose acetate strip will be placed in an electrophoresis chamber, with the end containing the sample placed closer to the negative electrode. An electric current will be applied across the cellulose acetate paper, causing the charged haemoglobin molecules to migrate through the report based on their charge and size. As the electric current is applied, the different types of haemoglobin move at different rates and separate from each other along the length of the strip.

Inclusion criteria

Subjects of both sexes aged 5-45 will be included.

For minor/underage participants written informed consent will be taken.

Exclusion criteria

Cases undergoing treatment for haemolytic anaemia, such as autoimmune management or splenectomy, along with supportive treatments like blood transfusions or iron supplementation.

Subjects under the category of vulnerable personnel, patients in emergency conditions, ethnic minority groups, homeless people, nomads and refugees will be excluded.

Bias

All necessary measures to control bias at all levels will be taken. As it is an observational study, all the samples which are routinely received in the section of haematology will be taken into consideration for comparison between the Hb electrophoresis technique analogous to the routine sickling test. Institutional supply of EDTA samples and chemical constituents present in a buffer from different companies make minor modifications, an essential part of Hb electrophoresis protocol. Diagnostic search influences the finding of electrophoresis sickling band, i.e. the influence of content of result captions in response to a diagnosis of samples.

Sample size

Cochran formula for sample size estimate

Formula for determining sample size:

S=X2NP1P+d2N1+X2P1P

X2 = the table value of chi square for 1 degree of freedom at the desired confidence level (3.841)

Prevalence of disease (Prev) = 0.5

Estimation error (d) = 0.5

N = Total patient with haemolytic anemia = 100

Sample sizen=3.841000.500.500.05299+3.84050.5=79.50=80patients needed in the study

Formula reference: Krejcie and Morgan (1970).16

Statistical analysis will be done by descriptive and inferential statistics using Chi square test, students’ unpaired t-test, regression analysis, one way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and multiple comparison Tukey test. The software used in the statistical analysis will be SPSS 27.0 version, Graph Pad Prism 6.0 and EPI INFO version 6.0.

Dissemination

The results will be published in an indexed journal.

Study status

The study is set to start in September 2023.

Results

Appropriate results will be obtained after the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of sickling test and haemoglobin electrophoresis are compared.

Discussion

Haemolytic anaemia is the premature destruction of RBC while paroxysmal nocturnal haemoglobinuria (PNH) is chronic and life threatening. Most cases take place in less developed countries where there are no reliable testing campaigns available. Some of the risk factors include acquired immunodeficiency syndrome, acute anaemia, jaundice, hematuria, dyspnea, tiredness, tachycardia, and potentially hypotension. Physical examination of blood count and peripheral blood analyses will be carried out in all cases. Haemoglobin electrophoresis is a confirmative test of haemolytic anaemia and has higher sensitivity and specificity than screening test for sickling. According to the outcomes of randomized clinical research, blood transfusion and nutrition (calories, total fat, saturated fat, trans fat, cholesterol, sodium (salt), total carbohydrate) are considered standard care for haemolytic anaemia patients.

In 2020, Bee et al. researched iron deficiency anaemia, and found abnormal haemoglobin disorder was the most common cause of microcytic hypochromic anaemia. It is possible to make a differentiating diagnosis with a full hemogram and a peripheral smear. Still, other tests, such as a serum iron profile and Hb electrophoresis, are necessary to make the diagnosis. The structural and functional abnormalities of Hb, or hemoglobinopathies, are a significant global health issue. Thalassemia and sickle cell anaemia are examples of these single-gene, autosomal, recessive monogenic illnesses. Microcytic hypochromic anaemia is a symptom of hemoglobinopathies. Hemoglobinopathies, which do not require iron, are often misdiagnosed and treated as iron deficiency anaemia. The body becomes poisonous when exposed to excess iron that is not needed. Microcytic hypochromic anaemia can be divided into various subtypes using electrophoresis. Correct diagnosis is made with the aid of electrophoresis.17

In 2006, Huang et al. undertook research T-antigen activation to predict haemolytic anaemia and pneumococcus-induced haemolytic uremic syndrome. The outcome for positive TA initiation for P-HA was 57% explicit and 86% sensitive. Overall, 76% of expectations were exact. There was no intergroup struggle contrast in the pneumococcal serotype 14 that causes P-HUS most often (5/10) and is sensitive to anti-microbial. A total of 13 of the 36 patients needed packed RBC transfusions, three passed away, and two needed extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Three of the patients also required transfusions. None experienced long-haul kidney impacts.18

In 2019, Garden observed the value of immune-mediated haemolytic anaemia diagnostic tests. The study compared saline and coombs test, which can be utilised to help to determine immune mediated haemolytic anaemia when examined.19

In 2016, Englum et al.’s results suggested that total splenectomy may require more serious consideration in children with the most severe haemolytic diseases. Future studies must look at these results in the context of the clinical advantages for children with various conditions. A total of 130 children were included in the analysis, and 81 of them (62.3%) had total splenectomy. All hematologic measurements in children with HS improved following TS, including an increase in Hb of 4.1 g/dl. Although the reaction was less strong, hematologic indicators similarly improved after peripheral smear (haemoglobin increase of 2.4 g/dL, p 0.001). In children with SCD, Hb levels were unchanged. Laparoscopy did not affect hematologic outcomes when compared to open surgery. Shorter lengths of stay were associated with total splenectomy and laparoscopy.20

In 2015, Sipol et al. conducted a study on the correlation among iterative labs for the distinguishing proof of paroxysmal nocturnal haemoglobinuria (PNH) copies utilizing high-responsiveness bloom cytometry in a Russian cohort. Seven PNH patients, five of whom were female and two of whom were male, had their copy sizes measured. Mean patient age was 37 years); three patients (one with aplastic weakness and two without it) had extreme haemolytic PNH and high plasma lactate dehydrogenase. Five of the patients had a history of aplastic frailty. PNH copy sizes at discovery ranged from 0.41 to 9.7% of granulocytes in patients with milder side effects, to 58 to almost 100% in patients with severe side effects. There were only negligible contrasts in the subsequent copy size estimation for every patient between the six research centres, especially in those with high qualities at determination.21

Limitations

Inter-observer and intra-observer flexibility. Hb electrophoresis can detect and identify common abnormal haemoglobin variants such as HbS. Hb electrophoresis and sickling tests may produce false negative results in certain situations. In some cases, these tests can generate false positive results. This study can occur when certain conditions or factors, such as dehydration, fever, or recent blood transfusions, cause temporary changes in the shape of red blood cells and mimic the appearance of sickle cells. Hb electrophoresis and sickling tests focus on detecting abnormal Hb variants. While these tests are effective in detecting abnormal haemoglobin variants, they may not be suitable for assessing other aspects of sickle cell disease or thalassemia.

Interpretation

Haemoglobin electrophoresis can identify different types of haemoglobin variants, aiding in the diagnosis of various haemoglobinopathies. Detection of sickling in the electrophoresis pattern suggests the presence of sickle cell disease or sickle cell trait, which can have significant clinical implications, but further confirmatory tests and clinical context are essential for accurate diagnosis and appropriate management.

Generalisability

A review of literature revealed Hb electrophoresis generally exhibits higher sensitivity and specificity compared to the sickling method for diagnosing hemoglobin disorders in the general population.

Ethical considerations

This protocol was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee of the Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Sawangi (M) Wardha, 4420001 Maharashtra, India (approval number DMIHER (DU)/IEC/2022/1206, dated 08/07/2022).

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 1
VERSION 1 PUBLISHED 13 Sep 2023
Comment
Author details Author details
Competing interests
Grant information
Copyright
Download
 
Export To
metrics
Views Downloads
F1000Research - -
PubMed Central
Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.
- -
Citations
CITE
how to cite this article
Mungale PR, Singh Chauhan L and Jagtap M. Assessment and comparison of the sensitivity and specificity of sickling and haemoglobin electrophoresis in haemolytic anaemia patients: A study protocol [version 1; peer review: 1 approved with reservations, 1 not approved]. F1000Research 2023, 12:1147 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.139387.1)
NOTE: If applicable, it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
track
receive updates on this article
Track an article to receive email alerts on any updates to this article.

Open Peer Review

Current Reviewer Status: ?
Key to Reviewer Statuses VIEW
ApprovedThe paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approvedFundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions
Version 1
VERSION 1
PUBLISHED 13 Sep 2023
Views
2
Cite
Reviewer Report 14 May 2024
Ran An, University of Houston, Houston, Texas, USA 
Not Approved
VIEWS 2
In this Manuscript, Electrophoresis has been used as a standard for SCD testing. There are standard operation protocols for both laboratory based electrophoresis and point of care electrophoresis for SCD tests.

This is a poorly written manuscript. ... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
An R. Reviewer Report For: Assessment and comparison of the sensitivity and specificity of sickling and haemoglobin electrophoresis in haemolytic anaemia patients: A study protocol [version 1; peer review: 1 approved with reservations, 1 not approved]. F1000Research 2023, 12:1147 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.152659.r263854)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
Views
4
Cite
Reviewer Report 23 Feb 2024
Asaad Mohammed Ahmed Babker, Department of Medical Laboratory Sciences, Gulf Medical University, Ajman, United Arab Emirates 
Approved with Reservations
VIEWS 4
Dear Author's 

I have carefully reviewed your paper titled "Assessment and comparison of the sensitivity and specificity of sickling and hemoglobin electrophoresis in hemolytic anemia patients: A study protocol" and appreciate the effort and thought you've put ... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
Ahmed Babker AM. Reviewer Report For: Assessment and comparison of the sensitivity and specificity of sickling and haemoglobin electrophoresis in haemolytic anaemia patients: A study protocol [version 1; peer review: 1 approved with reservations, 1 not approved]. F1000Research 2023, 12:1147 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.152659.r248773)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 1
VERSION 1 PUBLISHED 13 Sep 2023
Comment
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Approved - the paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations - A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approved - fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions
Sign In
If you've forgotten your password, please enter your email address below and we'll send you instructions on how to reset your password.

The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.

Email address not valid, please try again

You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.

You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.

Code not correct, please try again
Email us for further assistance.
Server error, please try again.