Keywords
Helicobacter, dyspepsia, peptic ulcer, gastritis
Helicobacter, dyspepsia, peptic ulcer, gastritis
Dyspepsia is defined as having a combination of one or more symptoms among epigastric pain, epigastric burning sensation, postprandial fullness or early satiation. These symptoms are thought to originate from gastrointestinal region in the absence of organic or systemic disorders.1 Although symptoms such as nausea and bloating may co-occur in dyspeptic patients and may point towards the disorder, newer definitions do not include these as cardinal or localizing symptoms of dyspepsia.2 Of all patients with dyspeptic symptoms, 20-25 percent have an underlying organic cause on diagnostic evaluation such as peptic ulcer disease, Helicobacter pylori gastritis, gastroesophageal reflux, biliary pain, malignancy, gastroparesis, pancreatitis, medication, etc.3 while the rest are attributed as functional dyspepsia which is defined as at least three months of symptoms without definite structural or biochemical explanation.4
Helicobacter pylori is a spiral-shaped, microaerophilic, Gram negative, urease positive bacterium that is adapted to survive the harsh, acidic environment of the stomach.5 H. pylori infection is often an underlying cause of dyspepsia and reports verify that eradication of H. pylori improves the symptoms in dyspeptic patients.6,7 The principal mechanism mostly involves altered gastric acid secretion and persistent active inflammation of gastric mucosa, in addition to delayed gastric emptying and antral gastric secretion.8,9 Among different invasive and non-invasive tests available for detection of H. pylori, the rapid urease test is a simple, cheap and quick test to detect urease activity in the gastric mucosa, which requires sampling of the mucosa with an endoscopic approach. The upper GI endoscopy with biopsies has an increasing diagnostic yield with increasing age in patients with dyspepsia, particularly in patients above the age of 60 or those with warning signs. The common endoscopic findings in a background of dyspepsia include erosive esophagitis, gastritis, duodenitis and peptic ulcer disease.10
Limited studies have estimated the prevalence of H. pylori in the Nepalese population with specific targeting of patients suffering from dyspepsia, with varying results depicted in available studies. The purpose of this study was to estimate the prevalence of H. pylori infection among dyspeptic patients presenting at the gastroenterology department of a tertiary care centre in Nepal and to stratify the different endoscopic findings seen among such patients.
This study was conducted at Shree Birendra Hospital, Kathmandu Nepal. It is a tertiary care hospital dedicated to serving the Nepalese army and their dependent families.
This study is a cross-sectional, analytical study done on the patients who presented to the Gastroduodenoscopy unit of Shree Birendra Hospital from May 2019 to March 2020. Patients with dyspepsia aged 18 years and above were included in the study. Patients not tolerating endoscopy, previously diagnosed with active peptic ulcer, or stomach cancer, and those who had received H. pylori eradication therapy in the last three months were excluded from the study. Patients with a history of partial or complete gastrectomy, and patients with active UGI bleeding were also excluded.
Non-probability consecutive sampling method was used. Dyspeptic patients presenting for gastroduodenoscopy during the study period were included consecutively. The sample size was calculated by using Cochran’s formula1 where:
Studies done in similar populations in Nepal had shown a prevalence of 70 to 90%.2,3 Thus, p was taken as 70%, q = 100 – p = 30%, Z = 1.96 for 95% confidence, and e = margin of error = 10%. Sample size was calculated to be 164. The final sample size was 170 considering a few non-responses.
A pre-designated proforma was used to record the data. Socio-demographic data and a brief history were collected. The patient’s age, sex, address, occupation, alcohol and smoking history, any history of dyspepsia, or any significant medical history were recorded. They were also asked about dyspeptic symptoms such as epigastric pain, epigastric burning, postprandial fullness, early satiety, bloating, and nausea/vomiting.
Endoscopic findings were categorized as gastritis, duodenitis, gastric ulcer, duodenal ulcer, malignancies; normal, and others. UGI endoscopy was performed using the PENTAX and FUJINON scope by a trained and experienced specialist. A flexible endoscopy tube was introduced after applying a local anesthetic agent and a biopsy sample was taken. Rapid Urease Test (RUT) was done using Helikochek and Pylochek. Biopsy samples, approximately 2–3 mm each were taken from the antrum and placed on the yellow-colored well-containing urea and a pH indicator. The urease enzyme produced by H. pylori breaks down urea into bicarbonate and ammonia, which causes the pH to rise and the color of the dot to change from yellow to red or pink.4 The positive results were read within 24hrs. No color change after 24 hours was considered negative.
The ethical clearance for this study was obtained from Institutional Review Committee, Nepalese Army Institute of Health Sciences (IRC-NAIHS) with the reference number of 245 (Ref. No. 245). Written informed consent was obtained from each respondent. Data were de-identified and kept on password protected computer.
All data were entered and analyzed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (IBM-SPSS), version 22. Both descriptive and inferential statistics were used for analysis. Frequencies, mean/standard deviation and median/interquartile range (IQR) were calculated for descriptive analysis. The Chi-square test was used to check the association between independent and dependent variables of categorical data and a p-value of <0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.
A total of 170 patients with dyspeptic symptoms presenting to the Gastroduodenoscopy unit were taken for the study. The median age was 49 (36 – 60) years with majority of patients below sixty years age group (125, 73.53%). The females (87, 51.18%) constituted majority among the total participants. Out of the total, fewer patients had smoking (49, 28.82%) and alcoholic (23, 13.53%) history. The mean years of smoking and alcohol units per day were 6.54 ± 12.349 years and 1.29 ± 5.034 respectively. Similarly, the endoscopic findings revealed gastritis (57, 33.53%) as a major pathology depicted in patients presenting with dyspeptic symptoms. Pantoprazole (131, 77.06%) was the drug taken by most of the patients for their dyspepsia (Table 1).
The overall prevalence of H. pylori was found to be 0.329 (0.259 – 0.406) at 95% Confidence Interval (CI). The males were found to have H. pylori infection more as compared to females (31 [37.35] vs 25 [28.74], p = 0.232). Individuals equal to or above sixty years of age tend to be infected more with H. pylori (16 [35.56] vs 40 [32.00], p = 0.663). And the smoker group was associated more with the infection (19 [38.78] vs 37 [30.58], p = 0.303). However, none of them were statistically significant.
The patients with alcoholic history were significantly associated with H. pylori infection (12 [52.17] vs 44 [29.93], p = 0.035). Likewise, based on endoscopic findings, patients with duodenitis (3, 100%) followed by gastritis (29, 50.88%) were associated more with H. pylori infection. But, this was statistically significant (p < 0.001).
The present study reported an overall prevalence rate of 32.9% of H. pylori infection among the studied dyspeptic patients. Previous studies from Nepal have reported wide variation in the prevalence of H. pylori infection among patients with dyspepsia (20.0%-68.1%).11–14 In the studies conducted in North India and Bangladesh, the prevalence of H. pylori infection was 85% and 78% respectively.15,16 As compared to the present study, the prevalence of H. pylori infection was relatively lower in developed countries like the United Kingdom 27.4%, Sweden 26.2% and New Zealand 24%.17,18 In contrast, higher prevalence rates than our study have been reported from other developing countries like Kenya 40.86%, Cameroon 64.39%, Mongolia 80.0%, Nigeria 64.0%.19–22 The variations in H. pylori prevalence rates throughout studies around the world may be caused by a variety of influencing factors, such as socioeconomic status, standard of living, ethnicity, and geographic location, different diagnostic methods and prior antibiotic use.19,23 In our study, RUT was used as a diagnostic method for H. pylori infection. Among the previous studies conducted in Nepal, some used histological examination as the diagnostic method.12,14 Chaudhary et al. used H. pylori stool antigen test for diagnosing H. pylori11 while Shrestha et al. diagnosed H. pylori using rapid urease test in his study.13 Khalifehgholi et al. conducted a study comparing various diagnostic methods of H. pylori in which the sensitivity of histology, RUT and stool antigen test was reported to be 95.6%, 95.6% and 73.9% respectively. In that study, RUT showed the highest specificity (100%), followed by stool antigen test (86.7%) and histology (77.8%).24
In the present study, the most common endoscopic findings among the H. pylori positive patients were Duodenal ulcer (100.0%), Gastritis (50.88%) and Gastric Ulcer (50.00%). In a study by KC et al., the most common endoscopic findings were Gastric Ulcer (87.3%), Duodenal Ulcer (85%) and Gastritis (63.9%).14 In another study reported from Saudi Arabia, Duodenal ulcer (47.1%), Gastric Ulcer (45.2%) and Gastritis (44.0%) were the most common endoscopic findings.23 These kinds of disparities may be attributed to other factors like ethnicity, socio-economic status and geographical location. In the present study, no significant association was found between the H. pylori infection and smoking habit. 38.78% smokers were found to be H. pylori infected while 30.58% non-smokers were H. pylori positive. This finding is in agreement with Akeel et al. and Khalifa et al. who also reported no significant difference in H. pylori infection between smokers and non-smokers.23,25 There have been conflicting reports from studies regarding the H. pylori infection and smoking. Ogihara et. al. reported significant negative association between smoking and H. pylori infection, whose study showed 1.5-fold greater risk of H. pylori infection among non-smokers than smokers. This study suggested the hypothesis that smoking causes an increase in acid and pepsin production that shields the stomach mucosa from H. pylori infection.26 In contrast, another study reported a strongly positive correlation between H. pylori infection and current smoking.27 There was a significant association between history of alcohol consumption and H. pylori infection in our study. Similar finding was reported by Chaudhary et al.11 However, few studies have reported that moderate alcohol intake is associated with decreased prevalence of H. pylori infection and may facilitate elimination of H. pylori.28,29
There has been a wide variation in the prevalence of H. pylori infection from different hospital-based studies conducted in different parts of Nepal. There seems to be a need for another more comprehensive study in this region to examine the relationship between various socio-economic factors, presenting complaints, the effectiveness of various diagnostic methods, premorbid conditions and H. pylori infection.
H. pylori infection was still prevalent among a sizable majority of dyspeptic patients in our setting. It was significantly associated with alcohol consumption. More comprehensive studies are necessary in this region to study the relationship between socio-economic factors, diagnostic methods, premorbid conditions and H. pylori infection.
Figshare: Prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection in dyspeptic patients presenting to a tertiary care center of a developing country (spss), https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.22815713.v1. 30
Data are available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (CC-BY 4.0).
Views | Downloads | |
---|---|---|
F1000Research | - | - |
PubMed Central
Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.
|
- | - |
Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?
Partly
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?
Partly
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?
No
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?
Partly
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?
Partly
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?
Partly
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Reviewer Expertise: H. pylori, Functional dyspepsia,
Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?
Partly
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?
Yes
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?
Yes
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?
I cannot comment. A qualified statistician is required.
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?
Yes
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?
Yes
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Reviewer Expertise: My areas of research includes - Histopathology, Cytopathology, Hematology.
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Invited Reviewers | ||
---|---|---|
1 | 2 | |
Version 1 25 Sep 23 |
read | read |
Provide sufficient details of any financial or non-financial competing interests to enable users to assess whether your comments might lead a reasonable person to question your impartiality. Consider the following examples, but note that this is not an exhaustive list:
Sign up for content alerts and receive a weekly or monthly email with all newly published articles
Already registered? Sign in
The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.
You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.
You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.
If your email address is registered with us, we will email you instructions to reset your password.
If you think you should have received this email but it has not arrived, please check your spam filters and/or contact for further assistance.
Comments on this article Comments (0)