ALL Metrics
-
Views
-
Downloads
Get PDF
Get XML
Cite
Export
Track
Study Protocol

Comparative evaluation of gestosis score vs uterine artery pulsatility index in predicting gestational hypertension: A study protocol

[version 1; peer review: 1 approved with reservations]
PUBLISHED 05 Oct 2023
Author details Author details
OPEN PEER REVIEW
REVIEWER STATUS

This article is included in the Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research collection.

Abstract

Background: Gestational hypertension and its consequences such as preeclampsia, eclampsia is a leading cause of maternal mortality in India. Multiple risk factors are already known to cause hypertension in pregnancy and with newer advances in the field of medicine, newer risk factors are also being detected which contribute to gestational hypertension. There is need to detect these risk factors so that women who are susceptible to developing hypertension in their pregnancy can be identified at the earliest and monitored and managed accordingly. This study includes two methods, gestosis score which is a newer method, and uterine artery Doppler pulsatility index which is commonly utilized in usually urban centers where ultrasonography facilities are available to look for these risk factors.

Objective: The study intends to compare the results of both prediction approaches, the Gestosis score and the Uterine Artery Pulsatility Index in identifying women at risk for gestational hypertension so that these women can be monitored vigilantly for the development of hypertension during their pregnancies and contribute to better management and healthy outcomes of pregnancy.

Methods: This study will include 140 pregnant women with gestational ages between 13 to 20 weeks. The gestosis score and mean uterine artery pulsatility index will be calculated. Women with a gestosis score of three or more are deemed at risk for gestational hypertension. Women with mean pulsatility index of 95th percentile or higher are labeled at risk of gestational hypertension. The outcomes of these two methods will be compared to assess which is more effective in predicting developing gestational hypertension.

Expected outcome: The study aims to provide insights into the effectiveness of both the Gestosis Score and the Uterine Artery Pulsatility Index in predicting gestational hypertension. The results will contribute to employing better risk assessment in clinical practice and the management of high-risk pregnancies.

Keywords

Gestosis score, uterine artery pulsatility index, gestational hypertension, high-risk pregnancy

Background

As outlined by the American College of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (ACOG), gestational hypertension is defined as systolic blood pressure of 140mmHg or more or diastolic blood pressure of 90mmHg or more on two instances of at least four hours apart after 20 weeks of gestation of pregnancy in previously normotensive women.1 When this high blood pressure is associated with proteinuria, it is known as preeclampsia.

Gestational hypertension is a major medical problem during pregnancy, with possible adverse implications on both mother's and fetal health.24 It is critical to predict and identify high-risk pregnancies early to provide proper monitoring and care. The pooled prevalence of Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDOP) in India is 9% (95% CI, 8%–10%), which is significantly higher than the global prevalence, as reported in a study done in pregnant women of the Indian population.5

Many initiatives have been carried out to anticipate and avert the onset of gestational hypertension and other pregnancy-related hypertensive disorders of pregnancy because of their epidemiological and clinical significance. In clinical settings, a variety of predictive multiparametric algorithms are employed. These algorithms utilize multiple maternal risk factors, radiological evaluations such as the uterine artery Doppler pulsatility index, and diverse plasma biomarkers to achieve their intended purpose.613 Despite the rising efficacy of these approaches, the actual predictive models for gestational hypertension are still a source of contention and hence not yet used in routine clinical practice.

Hence there is a need to analyze and promote newer predictive models which can help in predicting the occurrence of hypertensive disorders during pregnancy.

The purpose of this clinical study is to examine the effectiveness of two prediction approaches, the Gestosis Score and the Uterine Artery Pulsatility Index, in predicting the risk of developing gestational hypertension in pregnant women in the second trimester between the gestational age of 13 weeks to 20 weeks.

Gestosis score is a newly developed scoring system consisting of known and newly emerging risk factors for gestational hypertension developed by Dr. Gorakh Mandrupkar and modified by the FOGSI-ICOG committee (Table 1).14 The gestosis score is proposed to ensure accurate screening and prediction of gestational hypertension and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy.

Table 1. Gestosis score.15

RISK FACTORSCORE
Age older than 35 years1
Age younger than 19 years1
Maternal Anemia1
Obesity (BMI >30)1
Primigravida1
Short duration of sperm exposure (cohabitation)1
Woman born as small for gestational age1
Family history of cardiovascular disease1
Polycystic ovary syndrome1
Inter pregnancy interval more than 7 years1
Conceived with Assisted Reproductive (IVF/ICSI) Treatment1
MAP>85 mm of Hg1
Chronic vascular disease (Dyslipidemia)1
Excessive weight gain during pregnancy1
Maternal hypothyroidism2
Family history of preeclampsia2
Gestational diabetes mellitus2
Obesity (BMI > 35 kg/M2)2
Multifetal pregnancy2
Hypertensive disease during previous pregnancy2
Pregestational diabetes mellitus3
Chronic hypertension3
Mental disorders$3
Inherited/Acquired Thrombophilia3
Maternal chronic kidney disease3
Autoimmune disease (SLE/APLAS/RA)3
Pregnancy with Assisted Reproductive (OD or Surrogacy) Treatment3

# Systemic Lupus Erythematosus.

^ Anti-phospholipid Antibody Syndrome @ Rheumatoid Arthritis.

This scoring system takes into account both established and newly recognized factors that are linked to the causation of gestational hypertension. The score of 1, 2, or 3 for each clinical risk factor is determined based on its impact on the development of gestational hypertension. After conducting a thorough assessment and gathering detailed medical histories of the women, a cumulative score is determined for each participant. Women with a total score of 1 will be labeled low risk, a score of 2 will be labeled moderate risk and women with a total score of 3 or more will be labelled at high risk for development of gestational hypertension. As per one Indian study a gestosis score of 3 or more, appears to have promising diagnostic accuracy (95.35%) for predicting the development of preeclampsia (PE). It demonstrates good sensitivity (83.1%) and specificity (97.51%). The study showed the PPV of gestosis score in predicting preeclampsia is 85.51%, representing the likelihood of a positive result, while the NPV is 97.03%, indicating the probability of a negative result. This suggests it may be a useful early marker for identifying the risk of gestational hypertension and preeclampsia.15

Uterine artery Doppler velocimetry will be performed in the same women using a transabdominal probe. The pulsatility index will be measured in both uterine arteries and the mean will be calculated. Reference values for uterine artery pulsatility index are different for different gestational ages. Women with a mean pulsatility index more than the 95th percentile of the reference range for the given gestational age will be labeled as high risk and other women with a pulsatility index within the normal level that is below the 95th percentile will be labeled as mild risk for development of gestational hypertension.16

All these women will be routinely monitored during each ANC visit, blood pressure will be monitored regularly to detect de novo development of hypertension during their pregnancy.

Objectives

  • 1. To evaluate the effectiveness of the Gestosis Score in predicting gestational hypertension.

  • 2. To assess the effectiveness of the Uterine Artery Pulsatility Index in predicting gestational hypertension.

  • 3. To compare the predictive ability of the Gestosis Score and Uterine Artery Pulsatility Index in identifying women at risk of developing gestational hypertension.

Protocol

Registration: The trial has been registered with CTRI (REF/2023/04/065978).

Study design

This study will be a prospective observational study. The study will be conducted in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Acharya Vinoba Bhave Rural Hospital, Sawangi, Wardha, India and will be conducted from 2023 to 2024 (two years).

Eligibility criteria

Criteria for inclusion:

  • Pregnant women who are 19 years of age or older.

  • Gestational age between 13 weeks to 20 weeks.

  • Pregnant women who provide informed consent to take part in the study.

Criteria for exclusion:

  • Pregnant women who are not willing to be booked in this hospital for delivery.

  • Pregnant women with gestational age below 13 weeks or above 20 weeks.

Outcomes

At the end of this study, we will know whether the gestosis score has better predictive values as compared to the uterine artery pulsatility index in predicting gestational hypertension.

Data collection

  • a. Demographic data (age, weight, height, BMI).

  • b. Medical history and obstetric history.

  • c. Data needed to detect risk factors as per gestosis score (parity, utilization of assisted reproductive technology, family history of hypertension, history of psychiatric illness)

  • d. Blood pressure measurements at regular intervals during antenatal visits.

  • e. Gestosis Score assessment during the antenatal visit.

  • f. Uterine Artery Pulsatility Index measurements through ultrasonography.

Pregnant women visiting antenatal clinic at Acharya Vinoba Bhave Rural Hospital, Sawangi, Wardha will be examined. After obtaining informed written consent, 140 pregnant women who meet the specific inclusion criteria will be included in the study. Their uterine artery pulsatility index and the presence of a notch will be assessed using ultrasound. Pregnant women with a mean pulsatility index higher than the 95th percentile will be classified as high-risk, while those with a mean pulsatility index lower than the 95th percentile will be categorized as low-risk. The same participants will be carefully assessed for risk factors as per the gestosis scoring system. All pertinent statistical data will be gathered during the study.14 The pregnant women will be categorized into three risk groups based on their gestosis scores: low risk (gestosis score of 1), moderate risk (gestosis score of 2), and high risk (gestosis score of 3 or higher). The participants will be followed up until six weeks after delivery. On every follow-up, blood pressure will be checked to look for hypertension.

Sample size calculation

In this study, the Daniel formula17 is employed to determine the required sample size using a prevalence rate of 9% for gestational hypertension.

n=Z2P1P/d2

“n” represents the necessary sample size,

Z is a statistical value to determine the level of confidence. In the case of a 95% confidence level, the Z-value is 1.96.

P value is the Estimated prevalence of gestational hypertension (proportion of pregnant women with gestational hypertension), which is 9% or 0.09 in this case.

And d is desired margin of error (precision), which is 5% or 0.05 in this case.

Calculation of sample size:

n=Z2P1P/d2
n=1.962x0.09x10.09/0.052
n=3.8416x0.09x0.91/0.0025
n125.85

Therefore, the sample size required is 126 pregnant women for the study with a prevalence of 9%.

Based on the prevalence of gestational hypertension (9%) and desired precision (5%), the calculated sample size is approximately 126 pregnant women. The target enrolment will be set at 140 participants to account for potential attrition and data loss.

Data analysis

Chi-square test and students paired t-test will be used to analyze the data.

The collected data will be organized in an Excel sheet and a master chart will be generated for further analysis. The statistical analysis will be conducted using SPSS version 27 software, considering a desired error margin and a confidence interval of 95%.

All collected data will be stored securely, and participant identities will be kept confidential.

Ethical considerations

Approval from the Institutional Ethical Committee has been obtained before enrolling any participants in the study. Informed written consent will be obtained from each participant.

Ethical approval has been obtained for this study from the institutional ethical committee of Datta Meghe Institution of Higher Education and Research (approval: ECR/440/Inst/2013/RR-2019) on 21/07/2022.

Dissemination of results

The results of this study will be published in an indexed journal for wider dissemination and accessibility and presented at relevant scientific conferences to contribute to the existing body of knowledge on gestational hypertension prediction.

Study status

Data collection has started.

Limitation

A limitation of this study is the small sample size and the fact it is a single centre study.

Larger sample size and multicentric studies will be needed to apply study results in wider population.

Implications

This research may lead to improved early detection and intervention strategies for gestational hypertension, potentially reducing adverse maternal and fetal outcomes.

Gestosis score14 (https://m.apkpure.com/hdp-gestosis-score/hdp.gestosis.score).

Discussion

As gestational hypertension has morbid consequences on the outcome of pregnancy, there is a need not only for diagnosis and management of gestational hypertension but also for methods that will help in identifying women who may develop gestational hypertension in pregnancy. This study evaluates the predictive abilities of two such methods, gestosis score with uterine artery pulsatility index with the expected outcome of gestosis score being better radiological evaluation in detecting at-risk pregnant women. This study will help in employing gestosis score as a screening method at health centers where ultrasonography or other expensive biochemical investigations cannot be done.

High-risk pregnancies will be diagnosed earlier and managed accordingly to provide healthy outcomes and safe motherhood to women.

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 1
VERSION 1 PUBLISHED 05 Oct 2023
Comment
Author details Author details
Competing interests
Grant information
Copyright
Download
 
Export To
metrics
Views Downloads
F1000Research - -
PubMed Central
Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.
- -
Citations
CITE
how to cite this article
Dahiphale S, Potdar J, Acharya N and Garapati J. Comparative evaluation of gestosis score vs uterine artery pulsatility index in predicting gestational hypertension: A study protocol [version 1; peer review: 1 approved with reservations]. F1000Research 2023, 12:1271 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.140806.1)
NOTE: If applicable, it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
track
receive updates on this article
Track an article to receive email alerts on any updates to this article.

Open Peer Review

Current Reviewer Status: ?
Key to Reviewer Statuses VIEW
ApprovedThe paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approvedFundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions
Version 1
VERSION 1
PUBLISHED 05 Oct 2023
Views
9
Cite
Reviewer Report 12 Feb 2024
Paolo Ivo Cavoretto, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy 
Approved with Reservations
VIEWS 9
The protocol is sound and interesting. However, I have few major remarks to improve the study design:
1. outside the research design of RCT for such a study project it is mandatory to consider a multivariable model taking into ... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
Cavoretto PI. Reviewer Report For: Comparative evaluation of gestosis score vs uterine artery pulsatility index in predicting gestational hypertension: A study protocol [version 1; peer review: 1 approved with reservations]. F1000Research 2023, 12:1271 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.154201.r242889)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 1
VERSION 1 PUBLISHED 05 Oct 2023
Comment
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Approved - the paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations - A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approved - fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions
Sign In
If you've forgotten your password, please enter your email address below and we'll send you instructions on how to reset your password.

The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.

Email address not valid, please try again

You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.

You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.

Code not correct, please try again
Email us for further assistance.
Server error, please try again.