ALL Metrics
-
Views
-
Downloads
Get PDF
Get XML
Cite
Export
Track
Research Article

Study of the hydraulic correlation in the removal of pollutants from synthetic wastewater by means of a filter with Musa Paradisiaca

[version 1; peer review: 2 approved with reservations]
PUBLISHED 13 Feb 2023
Author details Author details
OPEN PEER REVIEW
REVIEWER STATUS

Abstract

Background: The objective of this work was to decontaminate synthetic sewage from fouracid blue (BRL) dye, with characteristics similar to those of the textile industry, to determine the correlation between flow rate, permeability and removal of hexavalent chromium (Cr+ 6), Cupper (Cu), chemical oxygen demand COD and color using Paradise Muse filter bed.
Methods: three concentrations of BRL synthetic wastewater were prepared, determining the initial concentrations of Color, pH, COD, Cr +6 and Cu. In addition, the hydraulic characteristics of the fiber were determined in four types of fiber cut. The synthetic wastewater was filtered in a filtration cell with the three fiber cuts, using three speeds, the time used for these tests was 180 minutes. Water samples were collected every 5 minutes and then analyzed in the laboratory. Simple exponential smoothing was performed on the data obtained, and the statistical analysis of variance ANOVA of 2 factors.
Results: The results show that flow velocity and permeability are correlated with color removal, COD and Cr+ 6, determining that the best treatment was to use 1 cm fiber and high flow velocity in which 77.92% and 70.01% for color and COD respectively. In contrast, for Cr+ 6 the best treatment was fiber at 1 cm and low flow velocity removing up to 80% of the concentration of this contaminant and for Cu the best treatment was fiber at 3 cm and low flow velocity removing up to 88.69%.
Conclusions: It was determined that the Musa Pardisiaca fiber is capable of absorbing contaminants, but the effectiveness of the treatment depends on the initial conditions of the synthetic water, the cut of the fiber and the velocity. In addition, it is important to mention that, in order to lower heavy metal concentrations, low flow rates should be used.

Keywords

Bioadsorption, filter bed, musa paradisiaca, wastewater

Introduction

The wastewater produced from anthropic origin produces alterations and environmental problems worldwide, these change the characteristics of ecosystems and encourage the spread of disease (Meneses Barroso et al., 2018). The textile industry is the main source of contamination of water sources, as its processes use chemicals, detergents, oils and others. For example, chemical dyes used by the textile industry for garment dyeing generate wastewater with intense colors, and disposal into the riverbeds produce changes in their ecosystem because they do not allow the passage of sunlight for the process of self-purification (Zhongming et al., 2021).

The textile, food, beverage and paper industries are the largest contributors to water resource pollution. Of the pollution that each of these productive sectors contributes 14.6% of industrial water pollution, worldwide, is associated with the textile industry. These figures refer to so-called low and middle income countries, located in Asia, Latin America, the Middle East, North Africa and the Caribbean (Grakova et al., 2021).

Waste water from the textile industries has been a subject of study for many years because of environmental problems, since it has a high biological oxygen demand (BOD) and chemical oxygen demand (COD) which are discharged at high temperatures and can present heavy metals and other complex chemicals threatening the environment in which they are discharged (Feuzer-Matos et al., 2022).

One of the most relevant indicators of water pollution is color, this parameter is mainly associated with the textile industry that uses color diversity (Montoya Alvarez, 2019). Dyes are generally organic compounds that have the ability to impart color to fibers of various origins, whether textile, as well as leather, paper, plastic and even food (Jabar et al., 2020). For a substance to function as a dye it must have an adequate color, ability to attach to the tissue and resistance to the action of water. There are more than 100000 types of dyes available commercially and it is estimated that around 7000 new dyes are produced annually (Saxena & Gupta, 2020).

The environmental impact generated by these toxic substances has led the scientific community to develop different methods for the treatment of industrial effluents such as: precipitation, oxy-reduction, ion exchange, filtration, electrochemical treatment, membrane technologies and evaporative recovery. However, these methods have been quite costly, in addition to the formation, disposal and storage of sludge and waste, originating during the processes, which becomes a major problem to be solved (Ramírez Calderón et al., 2020).

Because of this bioadsorption processes arise as an alternative for the treatment of effluents produced by the textile industry using as a sorbent different materials of biological origin that are low cost and are in great abundance in nature. Moreover, its biosorbent transformation is not a costly process by treating agricultural waste that previously had no use (Elgarahy et al., 2021). That is, this method mainly seeks the removal of heavy metals in wastewater from the industrial sector, using different biological sorbent materials such as: algae, fungi, bacteria, fruit peels, agricultural products and some types of biopolymers. These materials are inexpensive and are found in great abundance in nature, moreover, their biosorbent transformation is not a costly process (Corral-Bobadilla et al., 2019).

The bioadsorption process involves a solid phase (biomass) and a liquid phase (water) contains dissolved the contaminant to be treated (in this case, the ions of heavy metals). In order for the bioadsorption process to be carried out successfully, there must be a high affinity between the functional groups of the biomass and the pollutant, since the phenomenon of bioadsorption of metal ions, using biological materials as adsorbents, can be performed by various physico-chemical and metabolic mechanisms in which the process of capturing heavy metals may differ (Das et al., 2021).

In general, the extraction of metals by residual biomasses is attributed to their proteins, carbohydrates and phenolic components containing carboxyl, hydroxyl, sulphate, phosphate and amino groups, which have a high affinity for metal ions, facilitating their capture (Corral-Bobadilla et al., 2019).

Three classes of adsorption can be distinguished according to the type of attraction between solute and adsorbent. If the adsorption is given by the ion exchange in which the ions of a substance of interest are concentrated on a surface of the adsorbent material as a result of the electrostatic attraction between them, the adsorption is said to be of an electrical type. However, if the adsorbed molecule is not fixed at a specific place on the surface, but rather is free to move within the interface, adsorption is said to be due to van der Waals forces or also called physisorption. Incidentally, if the adsorbate forms strong bonds located in the active centers of the adsorbent, it can be said that adsorption has a chemical nature. It should be noted that in physisorption, the adsorbed species retains its chemical nature, while during the chemisorcion, the adsorbed species undergoes a transformation leading to a different species (Ratri et al., 2022).

There are variables that affect the phenomenon of bioadsorption such as temperature, pH, particle size and the presence of other ions. An elevated temperature may cause a change in sorbent texture and a deterioration of the material leading to a loss of sorption capacity (Corral-Bobadilla et al., 2019). The pH of the aqueous solution is an important parameter that controls the adsorption processes of metals in different adsorbents, due to the fact that hydrogen ions constitute a highly competitive adsorbate. The adsorption of metal ions depends both on the nature of the adsorbent surface and the distribution of the chemical species of the metal in the aqueous solution. The pH value of the aqueous phase is the most important factor in both cation and anion adsorption, the effect being different in both cases. Thus, while the adsorption of cations is usually favored for pH values higher than 4.5, the adsorption of anions prefers a low value of pH, between 1.5 and 4 (Sepulveda et al., 2022). Particle size effect adsorption takes place mainly inside the particles, on the pore walls at specific points. The amount of adsorbate (solute) that can be adsorbed is directly proportional to the volume, and it is well known that this volume is directly proportional to the external area and also that a small particle has greater surface area, greater area of the inner surface by the amount of pores per unit of mass. The presence of ions in the solution allows them to compete with metal in the interest of sorption zones (Corral-Bobadilla et al., 2019).

Among some of the wastewater treatment with vegetable fibers (Bioadsorbents) we can mention:

Evaluation of the biosorbent power of orange peel for the removal of heavy metals, Pb (II) and Zn (II). In the present work we investigated the biosorption of Pb (II) and Zn (II) from the biomass of dried orange peel, crushed, with and without crosslinking treatment (with CaCl2). Of the 8 experiments, it was found that for Pb (II) showed removal percentage of 99.5 % with removal capacity of 9.39 mg Pb (II)/g orange peel. The best percentage of Zn (II) removal was 99.5%, whose removal capacity was 9.95 mg of Zn (II)/g orange peel (Fola Akinhanmi et al., 2020).

Use of biosorbents for nickel and lead removal in binary systems. The adsorption of Pb (II) and Ni (II) on yam shells and palm bagasse was systematically studied in an individual and binary system, reaching for yam shells a maximum adsorption capacity of 362.45 for nickel and 68.14 mg/g for lead. For palm bagasse, an adsorption capacity of 162.64 mg/g was estimated for nickel and 90.28 mg/g for lead. In a binary system, an antagonistic effect was observed for the combined action of metals, although the removal of lead was significantly increased in yam shells when in solution accuses with nickel (Benettayeb et al., 2021).

Adsorption of Cr+6 by Cocos nucífera L. in residual of Fibrocemento in Santiago de Cuba. This work studied the adsorption of Cr+6 using the fruit shell of the Cocos nucífera L. plant as organic biomass. The optimal adsorption values of Cr+6 are: pH of 3 units; particle size less than 0.074 mm; adsorbent dose of 5 g.dm-3 and contact time of 1 hour. At low metal concentration values (1,0; 1.5 and 1.84 mg.dm-3) was obtained removal percentage greater than 90, however at high concentration values (2.5 and 3 mg.dm-3), values lower than 90 % are obtained (Itankar & Patil, 2022).

Within this line of research, the work aims to decontaminate synthetic water prepared from the BRL blue dye with characteristics similar to that of a textile industry, to determine the correlation between the flow rate, permeability, removal of heavy metals (hexavalent chromium and copper), chemical oxygen demand (COD) and colour using a filter bed with paradisiacal musa fibre, so that future studies can determine the feasibility of the actual implementation of fiber at the textile industry level based on the results obtained in this research.

Methods

The research work is experimental, and the procedure was divided into 5 parts: the characterization of the fiber musa paradisiaca, elaboration and characterization of the synthetic water, application of the natural fiber as filter bed and the characterization of the treated water. ANOVA analysis of two factors was performed to treat the results.

In the characterization of the natural fiber musa paradisiaca was used from the data reported in the work of Aucancela (2018), where the following were reported: pH, humidity percentage, ash percentage, organic carbon determination, lignin percentage, fiber density, porosity and permeability.

For the processing of synthetic wastewater, the color parameter was taken as the basis, considering a value of 4540 U Pt-Co for high concentrations because in the study "Analysis of the fiber obtained from the rachis of the musa paradisiaca plant, used as a filter bed in the adsorption of the color parameter" was observed that for high color concentrations (41305 U Pt-Co) the fiber is not effective in color adsorption (Aucancela, 2018, pag 20-25). Three wastewater types were made using the blue dye BRL in concentrations as indicated in Table 1. This in the drinking water base which has electrical conductivity values of 593 μS/cm, 7.1 pH, Cr+6, COD and copper with zero values.

Table 1. Synthetic wastewater preparation.

ConcentrationColor units (U Pt-Co)
High5000.00
Stocking1083.33
Low105.00

The characterization of the synthetic wastewater was carried out, the pH and conductivity analysis with the multiparameter HACH HQ40d, for which the sample of 100 mL of synthetic water was placed in a beaker and the reading was done with the equipment. Color analysis, COD, hexavalent chromium (Cr+6) and copper (Cu) were performed using the HACH DR500 spectrophotometer following the different processes stipulated in the water analysis manual (Davidson et al., 2022; Hach Company, 2000):

Color: use UV/VIS DR5000 equipment with parameter code 120 and wavelength at 455 nm (nanometers), take a deionized water sample in the 25 mL cell and use as white and mark as ZERO in the equipment, the sample is shaken for 1 minute and a sample of 25 mL is taken in the cell and placed on the computer, READ is clicked, and the value is recorded.

COD: The sample is shaken for 1 minute, then a 2 mL aliquot is taken with a graduated pipette and poured into the high-range COD-AC vial (0-1500 mg/L COD), in the same way 2 mL of deionized water is taken and poured into the high-range COD-AC vial (0-1500 mg/L COD), the vials are shaken gently with the samples and placed in the thermal reactor at 150 °C for 2 hours, after which the vials are allowed to cool. Then search the code 430 in the UV/VIS DR5000, use the vial with deionized water is clicked on ZERO, then the vial is placed with the synthetic water sample and READ is clicked, the COD value in mg/L is recorded.

Cr+6 and Cromo were samples sent to be analyzed at the Environmental Services Laboratory of the National University of Chimborazo, whose methods correspond to those described in Standard Methods Ed 21 (Rice et al., 2017)

The flow cell used for treatability tests has the following internal dimensions: internal diameter D = 6.4 cm and height L = 15.3 cm. The flow rate was controlled by a peristaltic pump obtaining high speed (V3 = 0,86 ml/s), average speed (V2 = 0.45 ml/s), low speed (V1 = 0.22 ml/s). The permeability was controlled by cutting the length of the fiber, so the treatment will be with normal fiber (Fn), fiber cut to 1cm (F1), to 2cm (F2) and to 3cm (F3). Table 2 shows the experimental design used and the abbreviations given for each of the treatability tests.

Table 2. Experimental design and abbreviations for each of the treatability tests.

Regular fiber (Fn)High concentration (Ca)High speed(V3)FnCaV3
Medium speed (V2)FnCaV2
Low speed (V1)FnCaV1
Fiber 3 cm (F3)High speedF3CaV3
Medium speedF3CaV2
Low speedF3CaV1
Fiber 2 cm (F2)High speedF2CaV3
Medium speedF2CaV2
Low speedF2CaV1
Fiber 1 cm (F1)High speedF1CaV3
Medium speedF1CaV2
Low speedF1CaV1
Regular fiberMedium concentration (Cm)High speedFnCmV3
Medium speedFnCmV2
Low speedFnCmV1
Fiber 3 cmHigh speedF3CmV3
Medium speedF3CmV2
Low speedF3CmV1
Fiber 2 cmHigh speedF2CmV3
Medium speedF2CmV2
Low speedF2CmV1
Fiber 1 cmHigh speedF1CmV3
Medium speedF1CmV2
Low speedF1CmV1
Regular fiberLow concentration (Cb)High speedFnCbV3
Medium speedFnCbV2
Low speedFnCbV1
Fiber 3 cmHigh speedF3CbV3
Medium speedF3CbV2
Low speedF3CbV1
Fiber 2 cmHigh speedF2CbV3
Medium speedF2CbV2
Low speedF2CbV1
Fiber 1 cmHigh speedF1CbV3
Medium speedF1CbV2
Low speedF1CbV1

Each test included a treatment lasting 180 minutes at continuous flow, pH, conductivity and color values were taken every 5 minutes giving a total of 36 samples, of COD, Cr+6 and Cu were analyzed at the beginning of treatment and in minutes 1, 5, 30, 60, 90, 120 and 180 giving a total of 8 samples. The same procedures and parameters described above were performed for the characterization of treated water.

Finally, the Statistical Analysis was obtained the average of the 3 values obtained in the laboratory over the 180 minutes of treatment, applied data smoothing, this in order to correct erroneous values. The method used is a simple exponential smoothing, this method contains a self-correcting mechanism that adjusts forecasts in the opposite direction to past errors. It is a particular case of weighted moving averages of current and previous values in which weights decrease. It is used for both smoothing and forecasting (Wei & Chen, 2022). The equation used is (1):

(1)
X^t=X^t1+αXt1X^t1

Where: X^t = Average sales in units in the period, t, α = smoothing constant, X^t1 = forecast sales in units of the period t-1,Xt1 = Actual sales in units of the period t-1.

The data obtained in the experimentation were evaluated by the statistical analysis of the ANOVA variance of 2 factors with a significance level of 95%. The percentage of removal or adsorption of each of the analyzed parameters was obtained with the initial value and the value obtained at the end of the treatment. Finally, the coefficient correlation between the flow rate vs the percentage of removal of pollutants and the permeability vs the percentage of removal of pollutants was calculated to find whether or not there is a correlation between them.

Results and Discussion

Table 3 reports the results of the physico-chemical characterization of the fiber and Table 4 the hydraulic characteristics of the musa paradisiaca fiber obtained in the flow cell.

Table 3. Physical Characterization - Chemistry of the musa paradisiaca fiber (Aucancela, 2018).

ParameterData obtained
Hydrogen potential (pH)7.26
humidity percentage (%)8.24
Organic carbon percentage (%)44.02
Ash Percentage (%)24.49
Lignin percentage (%)11.73
Apparent density (g/cm3)0.085

Table 4. Hydraulic characterization of the musa paradisiaca fiber.

Fiber cutPermeability m/sPorosity
Regular fiber (Fn)0.00037676.87%
3 cm staple fiber (F3)0.00034875.23%
2 cm staple fiber (F2)0.00029273.61%
1 cm staple fiber (F1)0.00025272.94%

The values regarding the lignin percentage, ash percentage and density obtained in this research are similar to those reported by (Aucancela, 2018).

The permeability data allow us to observe the directly proportional relationship between the fiber cut and the permeability, the same has been observed with porosity whose data are close to the values reported in a study of hydraulic characterization of coconut fiber (similar to the paradisiacal muse) with a porosity of 81% (Luis Huertas Blanco et al., 2019).

Table 5 shows the results of the characterization of the three types of synthetic water. As can be seen, synthetic wastewaters have color, Cr+6 and Cu concentrations similar to the characteristics of effluents from textile industries. Regarding conductivity, pH and COD, the values obtained are low because these parameters are influenced in the textile industry mainly by the dyeing and finishing processes making contact with other chemicals

Table 5. High, medium and low concentration synthetic wastewater characterization.

ParameterSynthetic wastewater high concentrationSynthetic wastewater medium concentrationSynthetic wastewater low concentration
Color (U Pt- Co)5000.001083.33105.00
Conductivity (μs/cm)965.00688.67643.67
pH8.167.817.48
COD (mg/l)98.3338.6716.67
Cr +6 (mg/l)2.810.610.38
Cu (mg/l)28.088.183.82

Table 6 shows the removal of contaminants in high concentration synthetic water after 3 hours of filtering water. The behavior for each parameter was different: Thus for the pH values are shown between 7.61 and 8.12 observing that the initial value of 8.16 is not altered staying within the range (5.5-9.5) for discharges to freshwater bodies (OFFICIAL RECORD, 2015). The conductivity presents mostly positive values whose results are better while increasing the flow velocity, reducing up to 22.33% in the F1CaV3 treatment. The color shows reduction values between 48.27 and 65.15% for each treatment. In the COD, better results were obtained while increasing the flow velocity, reducing up to 63.39% in the F1CaV3 treatment. Cr+6 reduction percentages are favorable for each treatment whose values are between 59.74 and 80.82% of removal. Finally, for Cu the percentages of reduction present fluctuations that, for example, in the treatment F3CaV2 is 18.03%, a small value relative to that obtained in the treatment F3CaV1 that was 83.54%.

Table 6. Removal percentages of pollutants in synthetic water of high color concentration.

pHConductivityColorCODCR+6Cu
TreatmentVf%RVf (μs/cm)%RVf (UPtCo)%RVf (mg/l)%RVf (mg/l)%RVf (mg/l)%R
FnCaV18.120.53%1027.2-6.46%2134.0957.32%142.3-44.7%0.9964.60%11.8057.99%
F3CaV17.626.63%963.990.11%2521.8649.56%91.007.45%0.9665.80%4.6283.54%
F2CaV17.606.86%953.891.15%2044.3759.11%81.3317.29%0.6377.64%7.8871.93%
F1CaV17.804.47%935.663.04%2353.5952.93%65.6733.22%0.5480.82%10.7061.88%
FnCaV27.676.02%842.9212.65%1742.3465.15%71.0027.79%1.0462.99%22.1821.02%
F3CaV27.754.99%814.0615.64%1824.4263.51%68.3330.51%0.9964.68%23.0218.03%
F2CaV27.616.71%861.8710.69%2482.4150.35%62.6736.27%0.9267.15%17.6137.28%
F1CaV27.735.24%849.7411.94%1761.4864.77%59.6739.32%0.8569.80%14.4148.67%
FnCaV37.863.70%761.6821.07%2392.5852.15%79.0019.66%1.1957.59%13.2152.96%
F3CaV37.922.90%801.8816.90%2448.4651.03%73.0025.76%1.1359.74%13.9150.45%
F2CaV37.952.52%795.8117.53%2436.0051.28%41.6757.63%0.9665.66%18.2235.10%
F1CaV37.853.76%750.4522.23%2586.5248.27%36.0063.39%0.9367.05%17.4837.75%

In Table 7 pH remains under regulation. The conductivity shows positive removal values only for high flow rates by removing up to 7.73% in the F1CmV3 treatment. In color, reduction values are found between 52.71% and 69.67%. The COD presents almost mostly negative values meaning that, it was not possible to lower the concentration of this parameter but rather increase it by factors such as ripeness and decomposition, the presence of fine particles and even the presence of water-soluble salts presumed to possess the fiber. The percentages of reduction of Cr+6 are between 43.29 and 64.74% of removal and those of copper range between 45.92% and 88.69%.

Table 7. Percentages of pollutant removal in medium-color synthetic water.

pHConductivityColorCODCR+6Cu
TreatmentVf%RVf (μs/cm)%RVf (UPtCo)%RVf (mg/l)%RVf (mg/l)%RVf (mg/l)%R
FnCmV17.760.68%912.29-32.47%328.5469.67%122.33-216.34%0.3050.37%2.3571.27%
F3CmV17.267.05%848.99-23.28%504.3753.44%71.00-83.60%0.2951.69%0.9288.69%
F2CmV17.247.29%838.89-21.81%410.5462.10%61.33-58.60%0.2460.69%1.5780.79%
F1CmV17.444.79%820.66-19.17%470.7256.55%45.66-18.08%0.2264.74%2.1473.87%
FnCmV27.316.42%727.92-5.70%350.5367.64%51.00-31.89%0.3346.27%4.4245.92%
F3CmV27.395.34%699.06-1.51%367.3866.09%48.33-24.98%0.3050.73%4.6143.70%
F2CmV27.385.56%746.87-8.45%483.3055.39%42.66-10.32%0.2756.22%3.5256.96%
F1CmV27.375.60%734.74-6.69%353.3067.39%39.66-2.56%0.2755.10%2.8864.76%
FnCmV37.503.99%646.686.10%482.4655.47%59.00-52.57%0.3543.29%3.0063.32%
F3CmV37.513.81%686.880.26%491.2954.65%53.00-37.06%0.3444.49%2.7866.00%
F2CmV37.592.78%680.811.14%512.3252.71%21.6643.99%0.3247.86%3.6455.45%
F1CmV37.494.06%635.457.73%517.2852.25%16.0058.62%0.3148.79%3.4957.31%

Table 8 shows the results obtained for each low concentration treatability test after 3 hours of filtering the water. For synthetic concentration wastewater, pH remains under regulation. The conductivity and the COD have almost mostly negative values meaning that, this parameter was not lowered but rather increased by the explained above. The color is between 51.14% and 67.93%, Cr+6 between 30.18% and 53.95% and Cu between 40.21 and 87.31%. Because unusual behavior was observed at the start of treatment in the treatability tests with the three concentrations of synthetic water referring to conductivity parameters, color and COD, it was necessary to apply more treatability tests with the pre-wash of the fiber, since it provides values to these parameters.

Table 8. Percentage of pollutant removal in synthetic water with low color concentration.

pHConductivitycolorCODCR+6Cu
TreatmentVf%RVf (μs/cm)%RVf (UPt-Co)%RVf (mg/l)%RVf (mg/l)%RVf (mg/l)%R
FnCbV17.430.67%881.63-36.97%33.6767.93%99.00-493.88%0.2242.06%1.1569.94%
F3CbV16.937.41%818.32-27.13%49.4352.93%49.00-193.94%0.2143.61%0.4887.31%
F2CbV16.927.52%808.56-25.62%40.9461.01%40.00-139.95%0.1950.60%0.8378.37%
F1CbV17.114.92%790.33-22.78%46.9255.32%22.66-35.93%0.1753.95%1.0771.99%
FnCbV26.976.84%697.92-8.43%34.7266.93%29.66-77.92%0.2534.77%2.2242.00%
F3CbV27.065.62%668.39-3.84%36.2665.47%26.66-59.93%0.2243.41%2.2840.21%
F2CbV27.065.68%716.87-11.37%49.3453.01%20.66-23.94%0.2144.80%1.7554.11%
F1CbV27.055.71%704.07-9.38%35.1666.51%17.00-1.98%0.2145.64%1.4462.18%
FnCbV37.174.12%616.684.19%47.9854.31%37.00-121.96%0.2730.18%1.4960.91%
F3CbV37.183.98%660.21-2.57%48.8053.52%30.33-81.94%0.2631.98%1.4063.25%
F2CbV37.243.17%650.81-1.11%50.9551.47%15.0010.02%0.2435.84%1.8152.49%
F1CbV37.144.50%605.455.94 %51.3051.14%11.3332.03%0.2436.04%1.7554.19%

The conductivity, color and COD values with which the fibre provides are presented in Table 9 below. Obtaining an average of 39187.75 μs/cm, 446.92 UPtCo, 5215.83 mg/l, for conductivity, color and COD respectively. Among the factors that influence the contribution of conductivity, color and COD by the fiber is its state of ripeness and decomposition, the presence of fine particles and even the presence of water-soluble salts that the fiber is presumed to have.

Table 9. Conductivity, color and COD values with which fiber provides.

ParameterFnCbV1F3CbV1F2CbV1F1CbV1FnCbV2F3CbV2F2CbV2F1CbV2FnCbV3F3CbV3F2CbV3FCb1V3Stocking
Conductivity (μs/cm)37300373473743037476434004327043460433103680036760368603684039187.75
Color (UPtCo)480509499495461459468463381369392387446.92
COD (mg/l)5490546354585429804055155510548140804053404840235215.83

It should be noted that, although fiber provides concentration values for conductivity, color and COD, this problem was solved by washing the fiber favoring treatment since, the fiber after washing did not lose its adsorption characteristics.

Table 10 shows the results obtained for each treatability test after a 3-hour treatment by the filter bed for synthetic water of low concentrations with pre-wash of the fiber. The conductivity despite the washing of the fiber has almost mostly negative values that means that this parameter was not lowered, but it was reduced compared to the values obtained in Table 10. In color, the percentage of removal is between 69.86% and 77.92% and in the case of COD better results were obtained while the flow rate is increased and the fiber cut is lower. The pH presents percentages between 1.34% and 6.18%, the Cr+6 percentages of removal between 32.78% and 46.95%. Copper reported percentages between 32.35% and 79.60%.

Table 10. Removal percentages of pollutants in synthetic water of low color concentration with the pre-wash of the fiber.

pHConductivityColorCODCR+6Cu
TreatmentVf%RVf (μs/cm)%RVf (UPt-Co)%RVf (mg/l)%RVf (mg/l)%RVf (mg/l)%R
FnCbV17.381.34%766.98-19.16%31.6569.86%45.00-169.95%0.2534.97%1.4561.96%
F3CbV17.322.08%758.72-17.87%28.8472.53%34.00-103.96%0.2435.91%0.7879.60%
F2CbV17.312.26%752.70-16.94%28.7172.65%20.00-19.98%0.2144.98%1.1669.76%
F1CbV17.065.59%746.20-15.93%26.6874.59%11.0034.01%0.2046.95%1.3863.81%
FnCbV26.937.35%674.13-4.73%28.4372.93%32.00-91.96%0.2533.03%2.5234.10%
F3CbV27.026.13%667.33-3.68%26.5074.76%27.00-61.97%0.2435.71%2.5832.35%
F2CbV27.026.18%669.73-4.05%25.6075.62%19.00-13.98%0.2242.72%1.9848.14%
F1CbV27.016.22%665.84-3.44%24.7176.47%9.0046.01%0.2242.84%1.7554.26%
FnCbV37.134.63%661.07-2.70%29.0472.34%31.00-85.96%0.2632.78%1.7953.13%
F3CbV37.134.65%658.25-2.26%26.3574.90%24.00-43.97%0.2533.68%1.7055.40%
F2CbV37.193.83%648.08-0.69%24.8476.35%9.0046.01%0.2436.26%2.1045.06%
F1CbV37.095.17%603.256.28%23.1977.92%5.0070.01%0.2339.75%2.0147.45%

The two-factor ANOVA is based on two hypothesis tests a null H0 and an alternative H1 that evaluate the two categorical variables. H0 states that all treatments are the same, meaning that there is no variation between the results in the treatability tests. H1 states that not all treatments are the same, meaning that there is variability between the results of one treatment and the other. The ANOVA variance analysis of two factors was performed using GNU PSPP open software and its statistical package Data Analysis for each parameter for all treatments according to the type of synthetic wastewater as follows with a confidence level of 95 %:

  • With fiber without prewash at high concentrations (Fsinlav.Ca.).

  • With fibre without pre-wash at medium concentrations (Fsinlav.Cm.).

  • With fiber without prewash at low concentrations (Fsinlav.Cb.).

  • With pre-washed fiber at low concentrations (Flav.Cb.).

Table 11 shows the results of the ANOVA analysis of two factors for both the velocity variable and the permeability variable with respect to the removal of pollutants from synthetic wastewater of high, medium and low concentrations. The obtained values dictate that in the case of pH the hypothesis H0 was accepted for all concentrations in the variable permeability and the variable speed H0 was accepted for high and medium concentrations, that is, similar results are obtained in these treatments, however for Fsinlav. Cb and Flav. Cb treatments H1 was accepted which means that, in these treatments different results were obtained. In conductivity, H0 was accepted for all concentrations in the variable permeability, determining that all treatments are equal and H1 was accepted for all concentrations in the variable speed, determining that not all treatments are equal. Color hypothesis tests determined that in treatments where no fiber pre-wash was performed all treatments are the same in the two variables accepting H0, this is because, as already observed in the laboratory experiments the fiber treatment without prewash alter them, However, when prewashing is performed, conditions improve, which allows us to observe that there is variation in each treatment, accepting H1 in the permeability and velocity variable.

Table 11. Summary ANOVA test of two factors.

SpeedPermeability
TreatmentSymbologyValueshypothesisSymbologyValuesHypothesis
pH
Fsinlav. Ca.Fcal < Ftab1.69 < 5.14accept H0Fcal < Ftab0.54 < 4. 75accept H0
Fsinlav. Cm.Fcal < Ftab1.06 < 5.14accept H0Fcal < Ftab0.42 < 4. 75accept H0
Fsinlav. Cb.Fcal > Phthal. Phthal5.16 > 5.14accept H1Fcal < Ftab3.70< 4. 75accept H0
Flav. Cb.Fcal > Phthal. Phthal9.85 > 5.14accept H1Fcal < Ftab1.11 < 4. 75accept H0
Conductivity
Fsinlav. Ca.Fcal > Phthal. Phthal37.53 > 5.14accept H1Fcal < Ftab0.57 < 4. 75accept H0
Fsinlav. Cm.Fcal > Phthal. Phthal37.53 > 5.14accept H1Fcal < Ftab0.57 < 4. 75accept H0
Fsinlav. Cb.Fcal > Phthal. Phthal36.11> 5.14accept H1Fcal < Ftab0.55 < 4. 75accept H0
Flav. Cb.Fcal > Phthal. Phthal81.89 > 5.14accept H1Fcal < Ftab2.72 < 4. 75accept H0
Color
Fsinlav. Ca.Fcal < Ftab3.55 < 5.14accept H0Fcal < Ftab3.38 < 4. 75accept H0
Fsinlav. Cm.Fcal < Ftab4.04 < 5.14accept H0Fcal < Ftab1.21 < 4. 75accept H0
Fsinlav. Cb.Fcal < Ftab3.83< 5.14accept H0Fcal < Ftab1.17 < 4. 75accept H0
Flav. Cb.Fcal > Phthal. Phthal41. 28> 5.14accept H1Fcal > Phthal. Phthal44. 82 > 4. 75accept H1
Chemical oxygen demand DQO
Fsinlav. Ca.Fcal > Phthal. Phthal6.42> 5.14accept H1Fcal < Ftab4.52 < 4. 75accept H0
Fsinlav. Cm.Fcal > Phthal. Phthal6.42 > 5.14accept H1Fcal < Ftab4.53 < 4. 75accept H0
Fsinlav. Cb.Fcal < Ftab5.16> 5.14accept H1Fcal > Phthal. Phthal3.70 >4. 75accept H0
Flav. Cb.Fcal > Phthal. Phthal11.27 > 5.14accept H1Fcal > Phthal. Phthal49. 00> 4. 75accept H0
Hexavalent chromium Cr+6
Fsinlav. Ca.Fcal > Phthal. Phthal12.25> 5.14accept H1Fcal > Phthal. Phthal10.39 > 4. 75accept H1
Fsinlav. Cm.Fcal > Phthal. Phthal18.85 > 5.14accept H 1Fcal > Phthal. Phthal10.33 > 4. 75accept H1
Fsinlav. Cb.Fcal > Phthal. Phthal35.66> 5.14accept H1Fcal > Phthal. Phthal10.04 > 4. 75accept H1
Flav. Cb.Fcal > Phthal. Phthal7.53 > 5.14accept H1Fcal > Phthal. Phthal18.86 > 4. 75accept H 1
Cooper Cu
Fsinlav. Ca.Fcal > Phthal. Phthal7.45 > 5.14accept H1Fcal < Ftab0.12 < 4. 75accept H0
Fsinlav. Cm.Fcal > Phthal. Phthal8.72 > 5.14accept H1Fcal < Ftab0.85 < 4. 75accept H0
Fsinlav. Cb.Fcal > Phthal. Phthal8.97 > 5.14accept H1Fcal < Ftab0.24 < 4. 75accept H0
Flav. Cb.Fcal > Phthal. Phthal8.34 > 5.14accept H 1Fcal < Ftab0.25 < 4. 75accept H0

In COD H1 it was accepted for all concentrations in the variable speed. In the variable permeability only for low concentrations with pre-wash of the fiber H1 was accepted, while H0 was accepted for treatments of the different concentrations without pre-wash Cr+6 accepted H1 for each of the treatments in the two variables, which means that different removal results were obtained in each of the treatability tests performed for this parameter. Finally, for Cu, the flow velocities are adjusted to H1while in permeability H0 was accepted in each of the tests at different concentration.

To obtain the correlation coefficient, the removal percentage was correlated with the different velocities at the same permeability and the different permeabilities at the same velocity for each parameter at all concentrations. The correlation coefficient will allow us to know if the flow rate or permeability are related to the removal of pollutants where if the value approaches 1 the correlation will be strong or perfect and if it approaches 0 the correlation will be weak or zero. The sign determines whether it is directly proportional (positive sign) or inversely proportional (negative sign). Table 12 below shows the correlation coefficients obtained between the different permeabilities and velocities for each treatment according to its concentration.

Table 12. Summary correlation coefficients obtained.

Permeability vs retention rateSpeed vs retention rate
TreatmentP vs V1P vsV2P vs V3V vs FnV vs F1V vs F2V vs 1
pH
Fsinlav. Ca.-0.8510.2100.3970.435-0.996-0.945-0.612
Fsinlav. Cm.-0.8510.9050.3290.435-0.981-1.000-0.612
Fsinlav. Cb.-0.8450.9640.1320.418-0.983-0.997-0.483
Flav. Cb.-0.6630.964-0.0080.4050.4940.246-0.535
Conductivity
Fsinlav. Ca.-0.9940.1190.2420.9280.8160.9680.993
Fsinlav. Cm.-0.9940.1190.2420.9280.8160.9680.993
Fsinlav. Cb.-0.9950.1070.2420.9280.8030.9680.993
Flav. Cb.-0.915-0.912-0.6150.8410.8240.8840.973
Color
Fsinlav. Ca.0.3280.3730.705-0.537-0.065-0.710-0.424
Fsinlav. Cm.0.8110.3740.849-0.974-0.074-0.919-0.426
Fsinlav. Cb.0.8150.3740.843-0.956-0.119-0.861-0.414
Flav. Cb.-0.944-0.962-0.9410.7840.8080.8790.972
Chemical oxygen demand
Fsinlav. Ca.-0.992-0.842-0.7880.7060.6370.9920.986
Fsinlav. Cm.-0.992-0.842-0.7880.7060.6360.9920.986
Fsinlav. Cb.-0.989-0.842-0.8520.7100.6690.8930.987
Flav. Cb.-0.886-0.813-0.8570.8140.9260.9611.000
Hexavalent chromium Cr+6
Fsinlav. Ca.-0.754-0.837-0.836-0.990-0.982-0.842-0.880
Fsinlav. Cm.-0.763-0.914-0.832-0.968-0.972-1.000-0.961
Fsinlav. Cb.-0.769-0.999-0.864-0.958-0.935-0.999-0.990
Flav. Cb.-0.757-0.881-0.752-0.836-0.961-0.994-0.971
Cooper Cu
Fsinlav. Ca.-0.465-0.6390.7650.035-0.360-0.807-0.977
Fsinlav. Cm.-0.463-0.6340.512-0.150-0.360-0.807-0.976
Fsinlav. Cb.-0.422-0.6510.546-0.160-0.366-0.809-0.976
Flav. Cb.-0.399-0.6630.524-0.154-0.368-0.842-0.967

Although the correlation coefficient was obtained for all treatments, the analysis of those tests in which H1 was accepted in the ANOVA analysis of two factors and which are highlighted in bold in Table 13. Thus, at pH the results indicate the velocity and permeability does not influence the removal of this parameter. In the conductivity a significant and perfect correlation was obtained, that is to say, the flow velocity if it influences in a directly proportional way since, at higher speed, greater percentage of conductivity removal. In color, the correlation of permeability is strongly inversely proportional, since the coefficient values are between -0.85 and – 0.95 and in the case of velocity the correlation is directly significant and strong since the coefficient values are between 0.70 and 0.95. Which means that color removal in the pre-wash treatment of the fiber is more effective at lower permeability and higher flow rate. In the COD the variable velocity, the correlation are between 6 and 1, i.e. between moderate and perfect which means that the higher speed is, the decrease in COD, while for the variable permeability correlation coefficients are between -8.13 to -8.88, that is, the correlation is significant and strong which means that the lower permeability the removal of COD is greater. In the Cr+6, the coefficients of correlation between significant and perfect that are greater than -0.70 so the lower the permeability and the flow velocity, the removal of hexavalent chromium will be more effective. Finally, in the case of copper, it was determined that there is no suitable correlation between the flow rate and the removal of contaminants.

The following (Table 13) explains the best treatments for each parameter in the different concentrations:

Table 13. Summary of the best treatments obtained in the experimental phase.

pH
ConcentrationTreatmentViVf%R
Fsinlav. Ca.F2CaV18.167.66.86
Fsinlav. Cm.F2CmV17.817.247.29
Fsinlav. Cb.F2CbV17.486.927.52
Flav. Cb.FnCbV.Lav7.486.937.35
Electric conductivity
ConcentrationTreatmentVi (uS/cm)Vf (uS/cm)%R
Fsinlav. Ca.F1CaV3965750.4522.23
Fsinlav. Cm.F1CmV3688.67535.457.73
Fsinlav. Cb.F1CbV3643.67490.455.94
Flav. Cb.F1CbV3.Lav643.67493.256.28
Color
ConcentrationTreatmentVi (UPt-Co)Vf (UPt-Co)%R
Fsinlav. Ca.FnCaV250001742.3465.15
Fsinlav. Cm.FnCmV11083.33328.5469.67
Fsinlav. Cb.FnCbV110533.6767.93
Flav. Cb.F1CbV3.Lav10523.1977.92
Chemical Oxygen Demand
ConcentrationTreatmentVi (mg/l)Vf (mg/l)%R
Fsinlav. Ca.F1CaV398.333663.39
Fsinlav. Cm.F1CmV338.671658.62
Fsinlav. Cb.F1CbV316.6711.3332.03
Flav. Cb.F1CbV3.Lav.16.67570.01
Hexavalent chromium
ConcentrationTreatmentVi (mg/l)Vf (mg/l)%R
Fsinlav. Ca.F1CaV12.810.5480.82
Fsinlav. Cm.F1CmV10.610.2264.74
Fsinlav. Cb.F1CbV10.380.1753.95
Flav. Cb.F1CbV1. Lav0.380.246.95
Copper
ConcentrationTreatmentVi (mg/l)Vf (mg/l)%R
Fsinlav. Ca.F3CaV128.084.6283.54
Fsinlav. Cm.F3CmV18.180.9288.69
Fsinlav. Cb.F3CbV13.820.4887.31
Flav. Cb.F3CbV1.Lav3.820.7879.6

Conclusions

The statistical analysis determined that the flow rate and permeability variables are correlated with the removal of conductivity, color, COD and Cr+6 while pH and Cu are not correlated.

For the permeability variable the correlation is inversely proportional while for the velocity variable in the case of conductivity, color and COD the correlation is directly proportional and for the case of Cr+6 the correlation is inversely proportional.

The best treatment was to use 1 cm of fiber and a high flow rate at which 23.37% was removed; 77.92% and 70.01% for color conductivity and COD respectively. For the Cr+6 the best treatment was with fiber at 1 cm and a low flow rate removing up to 80% the concentration of this contaminant. While for Cu the best treatment was fiber at 3 cm and low flow rate removing between 79% and 89%. Thus, proving that the filter bed of musa paradisiaca is effective for the removal of these contaminants.

Despite obtaining good percentages of Cu removal, Cr+6 and color, in synthetic water of high concentration do not comply with the permissible limits established by Ecuadorian legislation so it is recommended to use the filter bed especially for wastewater of low concentrations or that have been treated in physical - chemical operations.

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 1
VERSION 1 PUBLISHED 13 Feb 2023
Comment
Author details Author details
Competing interests
Grant information
Copyright
Download
 
Export To
metrics
Views Downloads
F1000Research - -
PubMed Central
Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.
- -
Citations
CITE
how to cite this article
Mendoza B, Barrazueta Rojas SG, Pacheco Cunduri MA et al. Study of the hydraulic correlation in the removal of pollutants from synthetic wastewater by means of a filter with Musa Paradisiaca [version 1; peer review: 2 approved with reservations]. F1000Research 2023, 12:165 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.130776.1)
NOTE: If applicable, it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
track
receive updates on this article
Track an article to receive email alerts on any updates to this article.

Open Peer Review

Current Reviewer Status: ?
Key to Reviewer Statuses VIEW
ApprovedThe paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approvedFundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions
Version 1
VERSION 1
PUBLISHED 13 Feb 2023
Views
9
Cite
Reviewer Report 22 Mar 2023
Rudolf Kiefer, Faculty of Applied Sciences, Ton Duc Thang University, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam 
Approved with Reservations
VIEWS 9
The manuscript "Study of the hydraulic correlation in the removal of pollutants from synthetic wastewater by means of a filter with Musa Paradisiaca" reads a bit like a report than a scientific paper. There are some gaps that need be ... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
Kiefer R. Reviewer Report For: Study of the hydraulic correlation in the removal of pollutants from synthetic wastewater by means of a filter with Musa Paradisiaca [version 1; peer review: 2 approved with reservations]. F1000Research 2023, 12:165 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.143556.r166475)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
Views
12
Cite
Reviewer Report 14 Mar 2023
Sinan Kul, Department of Emergency Aid and Disaster Management, Bayburt University, Bayburt, Turkey 
Approved with Reservations
VIEWS 12
  1. Do not use abbreviations in the title and abstract. Start from the introduction to using abbreviations and give the abbreviation in the sentence in which it is first mentioned.
     
  2. Instead of “Paradise
... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
Kul S. Reviewer Report For: Study of the hydraulic correlation in the removal of pollutants from synthetic wastewater by means of a filter with Musa Paradisiaca [version 1; peer review: 2 approved with reservations]. F1000Research 2023, 12:165 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.143556.r163534)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 1
VERSION 1 PUBLISHED 13 Feb 2023
Comment
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Approved - the paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations - A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approved - fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions
Sign In
If you've forgotten your password, please enter your email address below and we'll send you instructions on how to reset your password.

The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.

Email address not valid, please try again

You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.

You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.

Code not correct, please try again
Email us for further assistance.
Server error, please try again.