ALL Metrics
-
Views
-
Downloads
Get PDF
Get XML
Cite
Export
Track
Review

Water-energy-food nexus in the Great Lakes Region of Africa: Current status and prospects

[version 1; peer review: 1 approved with reservations, 2 not approved]
PUBLISHED 21 Apr 2023
Author details Author details
OPEN PEER REVIEW
REVIEWER STATUS

This article is included in the Energy gateway.

This article is included in the Climate gateway.

Abstract

Water-energy-food (WEF) nexus is a concept that aims at integrating these three key economic drivers which are very crucial for the improving the livelihood of the people, general economic sustainable development and social well-being of the world population. The effective utilization and management of these key resources require in-depth planning assessment of symbiosis, competitions and concession with an essential contribution in the nexus. This paper aims at reviewing the WEF in the Great Lakes region of Africa with a focus in Kenya, Democratic Republic of Congo, Rwanda and Uganda. The status and prospects in each country has been assessed and the interconnection between the three fundamental resources together with the effects of climate change towards the security of these resources in the selected countries have been discussed. The review has found out that the selected countries are indeed WEF insecure since the impacts of climate change and poor infrastructure play a vital role in the insecurities highlighted. In the focused countries, it was realized that the existence of weak institutional and legal frameworks, political instability and poor infrastructure indeed hinders the regional attainment of the WEF nexus for sustainable economic development. This therefore calls for a dire need for the adoption of climate change adaptation and mitigation measures in the WEF nexus through an integrated and holistic approach in the Great Lakes Region of Africa.

Keywords

WEF nexus, Africa Great Lakes region, WEF security, climate change

Introduction

The water-energy-food (WEF) nexus demonstrates clearly an interlink among three interdependent resources in such a way that when one of the resources is affected by a certain action, the effect is felt in one or both of the other areas. These three sectors are very vital and beneficial for the human prosperity, growth in order to reduce poverty and sustainability [Mabhaudhi et al. 2018; El Bassam 2021]. The nexus has drawn the global attention of the scientific research and policy sectors since its inception. Intensive discussions have taken place concerning the WEF nexus during the Bonn 2011 Conference, in the Sixth World Water Forum in Marseille in 2012, during the Rio negotiations in 2012 and the Stockholm Water Week in 2014 [Allouche et al. 2015; Urbinatti et al. 2020]. The concept highlights that there exists an inherent relationship between production and consumption chain of water, energy and food resources [Bijl et al. 2018]. The idea has been intensively conceptualized and debated upon by the experts but not yet incorporated amongst the local communities’ practices.

WEF particularly tends to establish the connectedness such as interlinkages, symbiosis and trade-offs between the components which were considered separately [FAO 2014; Mabhaudhi et al. 2018; Mahlknecht et al. 2020]. For instance, water is required for the generation of hydropower, biofuel production, cooling processes in the nuclear reactor plants, etc. Similarly, water is essential for human survival as it is vital for agricultural production through irrigation, food production, drinking water services. Furthermore, consumption of energy occurs in pumping water for food and irrigation, water extraction and distribution, desalinization, water purification, wastewater treatment and drinking water supply such as in long-distance water delivery from the source [Mahlknecht et al. 2020].

The WEF existence is subjected to external forces that are geared towards destabilizing the core interactions. The impacts of climatic conditions such as climate change has degenerated the WEF nexus stability such that food, water and energy resources availability is greatly influenced through agricultural output, available water for supply, and industrial cooling and heating demands [Mukhtar et al. 2019]. Already alteration in precipitation patterns is being experienced worldwide as a result of shifts in climatic conditions which is intensified by climate change, with decreased precipitation patterns causing limited access to water in river basins and reduction in groundwater storage capacity thereby leading to severe drought and hunger [Allouche et al. 2015]. Due to the severity of climatic conditions, it was predicted that close to 75-250 million people in Africa would be greatly affected by increased water stress by the year 2020 [IPCC 2007]. This scenario is currently peculiar in East Africa with Kenya’s northern population subjected to extreme drought and hunger in the past three years.

A decrease in rainfall amount reduces the rain-fed agricultural production as the declined rainfall amount results in unavailability of water for food as well as energy production [Lin et al. 2020]. Water stress situations and longer dry periods are a common phenomenon due to less precipitations worldwide with greater effect experienced in the developing countries. Irrigated agriculture and livestock production is negatively impacted by the hitch of prolonged droughts and heat stress. There are individual storms of higher intensity that has resulted to property damages, deaths and loss of biodiversity (recent floods in Nigeria, floods in Germany in July 2021).

With the exponential human population and economic growth, there is already an intense pressure from the growing demand of satisfying the human needs by means of utilizing the scarce economic resources in supply. There is a disproportionate human utilization of economic resources with continents that are rich and economically stable consuming more resources than the poor continents in the south [UNEP 2016].

Developing countries are well endowed with natural resources and their involvement in the international trade contributes significantly to their gross domestic product (GDP). However, due to market control by the western developed countries, these developing countries suffer a great deal from poverty, inequality, conflicts, political instability and insecurity [Ross 1999]. Further challenges such as cross-border and rural-urban migration problems have been on the rise as the population try to look for livelihood in perceived endowed areas. The WEF nexus alignment to sustainable development goals (SDGs), for instance goal number 2 on zero hunger, goal 6 on clean water and sanitation, and goal 7 on affordable and clean energy are likely to benefit the developing countries especially the Great Lakes region of Africa when the resources are well managed using the integrative approach that WEF nexus provides [Mabhaudhi et al. 2018].

The paper by Kanda et al. [2023], a study review of the Horn of Africa with focus on Djibouti, Somalia, Eritrea and Ethiopia, revealed that the focus countries are indeed WEF insecure. Considering the geographical location, the Horn of Africa has a considerable difference from the Great Lakes Region of Africa in terms of water availability and development. This review aims at compiling documentation about the existing information and knowledge on water, energy and food nexus in the Great Lakes Region of Africa. The study focuses on four countries in the region namely; the Republic of Kenya, The Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), the Republic of Rwanda and the Republic of Uganda. The general overview of WEF at global scale and narrowing down to the Great Lakes region of Africa with focus countries is discussed.

Current status such as the relationship between nexus and WEF securities, the challenges facing WEF in the African Great Lakes region and the prospects are presented. This has been selected to provide an overview aimed at promoting viable interventions in combating the crucial problems associated with WEF sectors using integrated approach other than providing sector specific solutions.

Methods

The review was conducted using evidence-based search on water, energy, and food nexus in the Great Lakes Region of Africa. This involved search conducted on the Web of Science, Scopus and Google Scholar databases. Further databases that are hosted by Organizations such as the World Bank, Food and Agriculture Organizations and World Food Programme were used. The search strategy utilized was adopted from Kanda et al. [2023] in order to screen the relevant literature materials for use in this study.

This study concentrated mainly on the major aspects of WEF to enhance the understanding of the status and prospects of the topic matter in the focus countries. The review was not exhaustively done considering the many literatures that exists on the subject matter and therefore it was cumbersome to exhaustively utilize the whole literature available. The outcome of the study review is expected to broaden the knowledge base of the study aspect which can form a basis for providing the much-needed solutions to the challenges being faced by the water, energy and food sectors in the region under consideration.

Biophysical and socioeconomic conditions of the Great Lakes Region of Africa

The Great Lakes Region of Africa (GLRA) has an approximate area coverage of 850,000 km2 surfaces of lakes, rivers and wetlands. This is approximately one-quarter of the earth’s area which is covered by the freshwater surface [Chimatiro et al. 2021]. GLRA has no universally defined boundaries, and it is rich of major lakes that traverses freely through the region [Cowx and Ogutu-Owhayo 2019; Chimatiro et al. 2021]. The region has a population of approximately 287 million people that depends highly on fishing and other agricultural related activities [Lowe-McConnell 2003].

The Figure 1 shows the map of the GLRA and the major lake basins and the coastlines found within the region.

fe07e695-63e9-440e-897a-dae8b7fe28e6_figure1.gif

Figure 1. The map of Great Lakes Region of Africa showing the major lake basins and coastlines (source: Authors).

Focus countries

The focus countries in this study are Kenya, Uganda, the Democratic Republic of Congo and Rwanda.

The DRC is located in the GLRA in Central Africa bordered with nine other Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) countries [Hassan and Tularam 2018]. The country enjoys the fame of being the largest in SSA, having a landmass area coverage of 2.34 million km2 with vast deposits of natural resources for example; oil, diamonds, copper and cobalt [Hassan and Tularam 2018]. The country serves as Africa’s greater water catchment tower having large amount of both groundwater and surface water reservoir respectively [UNEP 2011]. The country has a population of about 96 million people and thus numerated as the third most populated country in SSA behind Nigeria (214 million) and Ethiopia (120 million) people respectively [World Bank 2022a]. Poverty is widespread in DRC with more than 65 % of the population living below the poverty line ($2.15/day), and it was ranked as the world’s poorest countries [UNDP 2013].

The southern highlands of DRC experiences a cool and dry climate, whereas the alpine climatic conditions are experienced within the Rwenzori Mountains, with a hot and humid climate in the river basin [Kazongo 2016]. The rainfall amount being received in the country lies between 1000-1700 mm, with annual temperature ranges of between 19-31°C [Hassan and Tularam 2018]. There are occurrence of periodic climatic events such as seasonal flooding in the regions of the east and droughts in the south [Samba et al. 2008]. Majority of the population living in the rural areas heavily depends on agriculture and despite the visibly favorable climatic conditions in the DRC, the population is experiencing food insecurity situation as a result of the effects of climate change [Sonwa et al. 2012; Hassan and Tularam 2018; Dove et al. 2021], and efforts to reduce the poverty situation is very minimal due to the severity of the impacts posed by the climatic conditions [Hassan and Tularam 2018].

Rwanda is one of the East African countries with no connection to an ocean (i.e., landlocked) and covers an area of approximately 26,000 km2 [Muhire et al. 2015] and having the highest population density in the SSA [World Bank 2017]. Due to the political stability that is being enjoyed in the country after the 1994 genocide incident, the country’s population has exponentially grown to approximately 13 million and the growth is anticipated to continue through 2050 [Republic of Rwanda 2011; World Bank 2022a]. Rwanda experiences a tropical climate that achieves a mean temperature of approximately 20 °C with an average annual rainfall of 1000 millimeter [Ndayisaba et al. 2017; Austin et al. 2020].

The economy of Rwanda depends intensively on agriculture which is extensively rain-fed, with more than 75% of the population relying on agricultural activities for their livelihood; agriculture also contributes to a third of the country’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP) [Niyitanga et al. 2015; Austin et al. 2020].

Uganda is located within East Africa and is found within latitudes 1°30′S and 4°N and longitudes 29°30′ and 35°E [Nema 2006]. The country has a population of 46 million people [World Bank 2022a]. The country has a land coverage area of approximately 242,000 km2 and experiences a diversified climate; and receives an average annual precipitation of 1000-1500 mm in most parts of the country [Obua et al. 2010].

Kenya lies within East Africa and has a population of 53 million people [World Bank 2022a] and an area coverage of 580,367 km2. Kenya heavily depends on rainfall performance and distribution for her socio-economic activities [Huho et al. 2012], with over 60% of the activities being weather and climate dependent [Nicholson 2014]. Kenya’s economy is greatly driven by agricultural activities which constitutes about 25% to the real gross domestic product and provides the largest employment opportunity to the population as more than 70% of the population is employed or obtain their daily livelihood within the rural areas from agricultural activities which results to about 50% of the principal export earnings for the country [Kabubo-Mariara and Karanja 2007].

The climatic and ecological conditions of Kenya are very extreme traversing an altitude varying from sea level to over 5000 m in the highlands [Kabubo-Mariara and Karanja 2007]. The annual rainfall distribution in the country lies between 250 mm in the northern and eastern parts of Kenya also classified as arid and semi-arid land (ASAL) and 2500 mm in the highland and mountainous regions [Kabubo-Mariara and Karanja 2007].

WEF nexus studies in the Great Lakes Region of Africa

Few publications exist on the studies conducted relating to WEF nexus in the GLRA unlike research articles relating to Southern Africa region with South Africa dominating the studies undertaken. Different countries in GLRA have also conducted varied interrelations with regards to the nexus and thus difficult to connect the progress.

Study conducted in Rwanda by Johnson and Axelsson [2017] while investigating the role of hydropower for the country’s electrification plans revealed water insufficiency for the anticipated hydropower project plan as its expansion would lead to low water supply to cover the expected water demand in the country by 2026. Also the case study of Kenya explored similar trends observed in the SSA on the main factors contributing towards the deficiency of WEF like exponential population growth, extensive urbanization coupled with booming economy, and climate related vulnerabilities [Wakeford 2017; Okumu et al. 2021; Awandu et al. 2022a; Kanda et al. 2023].

Mukuve and Fenner [2015] case study of Uganda analyzed beyond the WEF by incorporating the soil nutrient nexus into the mix for better understanding of the nexus ability in tackling the food insecurity. Their study found out an existence of scarcity throughout the resources considered: water, energy, food and soil nutrients considering the food demand from source to service by incorporating the transformation of resources in the calorific demand analysis. The researchers encouraged the involvement of stakeholders in the process for legitimate and productive outcome.

Trigg and Tshimanga [2020] studied the Congo Basin and outlined its importance as an ecosystem that is not only very large but also having not been well understood by its uniqueness. The researchers pointed out that despite the basin’s potential of supporting millions of livelihoods, very little information of its ecosystem service is known. Similarly, Tshimanga and Hughes [2012] noted that due to the impacts of climate change in the basin which has resulted to rainfall seasonal changes and temperature distributions among others, the vulnerability of the population within the Congo Basin has negatively influenced the subsistence economy of the country.

The WEF nexus securities

Water security

The Great Lakes Region of Africa (GLRA) has an approximate area coverage of 850,000 km2 surfaces of lakes, rivers and wetlands, which is approximately one-quarter of the earth’s area covered by the freshwater surface [Chimatiro et al. 2021]. GLRA water catchment is traversed with major lakes that flow freely through the region [Cowx and Ogutu-Owhayo 2019; Chimatiro et al. 2021], and having the largest diversified freshwater ecosystem rich in aquatic biodiversity [Darwall and Vie 2005]. Millions of people in this region derive their livelihood from this well pronounced and diversified ecosystem [Loiselle et al. 2014].

The total renewable water resources of the region is about 940 km3/year, out of which the surface renewable water accounts for about 83% of GLRA renewable resource (774.4 km3/year) and the rest represents the renewable ground water resources [FAO 2022].

Kenya’s land cover suffers from water stress occasioned by both physical and economic water scarcity and vast proportion of the land mass comprise of arid and semi-arid lands (ASAL) [Ngigi 2002; Koech et al. 2020]. The irregular rainfall distribution both spatially and temporally has greatly accelerated the water stress situation in the country [Ahmed and Ndonye 2022]. The average precipitation in GLRA Is approximately 1200mm/ year, and the distribution ranges from 120 mm/year within Marsabit region in Kenya’s ASAL area to 1500 mm/year in Tshopo, DRC [Ashouri et al. 2015; FAO 2022].

The focus countries have a production water footprint of 5 billion m3/year of which agricultural activities contributes the most (46%) followed by Municipal water withdrawals (43%) then industrial usage at 11% [FAO 2022]. This production water footprint is more or less on a higher value when compared with the global freshwater withdrawal in similar sectors which amount to 53% (agriculture), 18% (industrial) and 29% (municipal) usage [Mahlknecht et al. 2020].

With the anticipated world population growth and higher proportion in the African countries, the countries within the GLRA as well as the greater Sub-Saharan Africa should brace for severe water stress situation resulting from additional demands and extreme pollution of the available water sources. Climate change impacts are expected to worsen the situation due to extreme drier conditions and severe variability in the hydrologic cycle [Bates et al. 2008]. Connor [2015]; UNICEF and WHO [2017] advocate for improved universal provision of drinking water and sanitation services through strengthening the water governance and holistic management of the water resources.

Energy security

Akom et al. [2020] and Boulle [2019] clarify that access to affordable and reliable energy results to an improved living standards of the households and enhanced socio-economic endeavors. Records found within the international organizations mandated with the energy accountability shows that the energy accessibility has improved globally in the recent years with economically stable countries achieving the 100% energy access by households [IEA et al. 2019; World Bank 2022a]. The scenario is different in the developing countries with more than 80% of the population still lack this basic commodity, with the highest proportion found within the Sub-Saharan Africa [IEA et al. 2019; World Bank 2022b]. Production and manufacturing industries and processes require intensive energy input with the industrial sectors representing 50% of the energy consumption. Innovative measures are paramount in the current energy situation to help lower the global temperature to 2 °C [IPCC 2007] as a potential pathways for society to achieve the Paris Agreement goals by striving to achieve the Net Zero Emission by 2050 [IEA 2021].

Generally power generation requires intensive water use through diversion of flow to create potential energy thereby abstracting water from the main water course and water consumption as a result of evaporation on the surfaces of the dam or during transportation [Falchetta et al. 2019]. Energy generation globally utilizes over 90% of the surface water [UNESCO 2014]. Sub-Saharan Africa is classified as hydropower-dependent continent as majority of the countries majorly rely on 50% of their total energy generation from hydropower and the region hosts close to 45% of the total population who depends entirely on hydropower grid connection [Falchetta et al. 2019]. Over-reliance on hydropower sources have a greater potential to power crisis due to prolonged droughts [IEA 2022a].

Kenya’s electricity generation consists of geothermal (44%), hydropower (33%) and diesel-powered (21%) energy sources [Boulle 2019]. The energy mix comprises of 68% biomass, 22% petroleum and 9% electricity [Tashtoush et al. 2019]. There is a greater potential of wind energy generation in Kenya and the exploration of its potential has accelerated in the recent past leading to the development of various wind farms in the country [Masyuko 2022]. Kazimierczuk [2019] review on the wind energy status and policy framework confirms a substantial development of wind power farms in Kenya with Lake Turkana Wind Power plant project being the largest with a potential of 310 MW. Other wind power farms include: Kipeto Wind power (100 MW), Isiolo Wind Power (100 MW), Meru (60 MW), Ngong (52 MW) and Baharini Wind Farm project in Lamu (90 MW).

Majority of the households in the rural Kenya mainly depends on charcoal and firewood for their energy supply [Awandu et al. 2022a], the trend that has led to an extensive deforestation in major parts of the country.

The Democratic Republic of Congo has a high potential of hydropower concentration located within the Grand Inga River with potential capacity of 44 GW sufficient to supply substantial power demand of the greater SSA region [Taliotis et al. 2014; Green et al. 2015]. Irrespective of the great potential of the Grand Inga River hydropower project and the existing hydropower sources, a greater population in the DRC still depend heavily on wood fuel especially in the rural areas as their main energy source, severely contributing to the detrimental impacts such as deforestation contributing to severe  environmental degradation [Kusakana 2016]. The energy consumption in DRC is highest in the residential sector for household uses like cooking and lighting corresponding to 77% of the total energy. The industrial sector comes second with a consumption share of about 20% [Kusakana 2016].

Rwanda has in the recent past experienced energy crisis emanating majorly from insufficient investment in energy sector. The ongoing urban industrialization has pushed the energy demands such that the existing energy resources have become insufficient, costly and affected by instability [Safari 2010]. There are massive untapped renewable energy sources in the country such as wind, methane gas, biomass, solar and geothermal which are under exploitation [Lujara and Kaunde 2007; Munyaneza et al. 2016]. All that notwithstanding, the country’s electric power generation capacity is considered lower than her potential and the access level is also limited [Munyaneza et al. 2016; Okumu et al. 2021].

With the creation of Electrogaz in 1976, the publicly owned company in Rwanda serves only 4.3% of the entire population with accessibility available to only 23% in urban areas and 1% in the rural areas. The energy consumption in Rwanda is about 30kWh/year/inhabitant. This constitutes the use of wood fuel which is approximated to constitute 80% of the total energy consumption. Close to 20% of the total population of Rwanda depends on wood energy for lighting and 99% as source of cooking fuel [Safari 2010].

There is dire need of sourcing alternative renewable energy sources, which is currently the nation’s top most agenda. The commissioning of the micro hydropower development with a potential capacity of 6.4 MW is a clear indicator of the country’s commitment to reduction of rural energy poverty [Safari 2010].

Uganda energy source is mainly derived from hydropower which accounts for 90% of the energy-mix. However, the energy utilization among the population is comprised of 95 % of biomass-based energy sources – wood, charcoal and agricultural residues [Adeyemi and Asere 2014]. This over-reliance on biomass energy sources has greatly contributed to the declining forest cover in the country and hastening the rate of desertification in the dry lands of Uganda [Byakola 2007].

Uganda’s per capita electricity consumption is 72 kWh/year/inhabitant and this is due to high energy tariffs compared to the neighbouring countries [Byakola 2007]. Wind, solar and geothermal energy are underdeveloped, with the energy policies in place geared towards the use of modern, clean and energy efficient technologies [Adeyemi and Asere 2014]. The country’s vision 2040 approximates the achievement of 12,700 MW of energy from their available renewable sources [Republic of Uganda 2013].

Due to the high costs of traditional fuel sources in use, energy insecurity together with the need to combat the greenhouse gas emissions due to over-reliance on fossil fuels, the GLRA just like the greater SSA has had paradigm expansion of heavily relying on construction of new dams even though there exists other cost-effective pathways of utilizing the existing large and cheap untapped hydropower potentials [Wu et al. 2017]. However, this paradigm shift need further assessment to enable the creation of alternative pathways that would utilize the alternative energy sources available having a potential to cover close to 866 TWh electricity demand for the vision 2030 [Barasa et al. 2018].

The adoption of micro and pico hydropower technologies that utilizes the kinetic energy of the flowing rivers [Güney and Kaygusuz 2010] having minimal to no changes to the riverine regime could be adopted for off-grid rural electrification [Vermaak et al. 2014; Awandu et al. 2022b]. Such technologies are compact, reliable, cost-effective and portable and do not require major civil engineering works on the river courses, thereby causing no potential harm to the river ecosystems [Yah et al. 2017]. The technology can be used in hilly areas where the development of conventional hydropower plants might not be feasible [Johnson and Pride 2010].

Figure 2 below summarizes the GLRA total energy supply and their sources. It is evident from the figure that the larger population heavily rely on biofuels as energy supply.

fe07e695-63e9-440e-897a-dae8b7fe28e6_figure2.gif

Figure 2. Energy supply sources by the year 2020, data inferred from [IEA 2022b].

Food security

Food security is a measure of the accessibility, availability and quality provision of safe food for consumption by the population [Bernard 2018; Awandu et al. 2022a; Kanda et al. 2023]. The food security status is attained when the population is capable of consuming sufficient safe and nutritious food for active and healthy living [Nkiaka et al. 2021]. Each state has the sole responsibility of ensuring provision of affordable and nutritious food to the citizenry and to ensure national food security for a healthy country and population [FAO 2023b].

Sub-Saharan Africa is generally food insecure with close to 300 million people living with severe food insecurity [Roser and Ritchie 2019]. An analysis of GLRA reveals that DRC severely suffers the food insecurity with 33 million people, Kenya (14 million) and Uganda (10 million) having access to one meal a day or none at all when no food aid is provided, while data is lacking for the Rwandan situation [FAO 2023a].

Cereals comprise of the most produced crops in the continent of Africa with great variations being observed across the different African countries, with corn, wheat and rice as the main crops doubling as the staple food in most countries [Saleh 2023]. GLRA experiences very low crop yields which has a negative influence on the food security in the region. For instance, Uganda has a crop yield of 2.24 t/ha followed by Kenya (1.81 t/ha), Rwanda (1.46 t/ha) then DRC (0.86 t/ha) [FAO 2021], a scenario that has led to malnutrition in the region as much of the population has no access to sufficient food [Roser and Ritchie 2019].

Agricultural production commands a bigger share in contributing towards the balance of payments for African economies [Giller 2020; OECD 2023]. The agricultural practice is mainly rainfed and therefore susceptible to the adverse effects of climatic conditions [Hjelm et al. 2015]. The availability of water both of good quality and sufficient quantity is critical in agriculture and consequently impacting on the food security [Awandu et al. 2022a].

The access to food supply in DRC is attributed to the militia conflicts in the region on the local institutions and governance. Due to the constant attacks by the militia group in the Congo forest, there is a general lack of security that prohibits agricultural food production [Alinovi et al. 2007].

Kenya’s agricultural production and crop yield severely suffered from drought and extreme dryness that has affected the country for the last three years causing acute shortage of food and water in the country [Ahmed and Ndonye 2022]. Pastoralists are the hard hit with the severe drought as they suffer extreme hunger and loss of lives and animals for three years in a row.

Challenges of WEF nexus in Great Lakes Region of Africa

There is clear understanding within the GLRA of the WEF concept as a tool to understand the interdependencies among the three systems and sustainably manage the resources in meeting the growing demands.

  • a) Concerted efforts have been put in place to address the emerging conflicts in the WEF sectors. However, there is lack of attention particularly the institutions and politics governing the sector [Scott 2017].

  • b) The conflicting roles of WEF players at all levels in the GLRA negatively influences the coordination and implementation. This results in arrays of confusion and disagreement on the roles and responsibilities of the various institutions involved [Scott 2017].

  • c) There is lack of concerted efforts on development of policy frameworks that guide on the use of shared water resources. Since each state tends to pursue unilateral policies, this tend to degenerate into conflicts as is the case in of Ethiopian Dam Mega Project [Kanda et al. 2023].

Prospectus of WEF in the African Great Lakes region

Despite the challenges that hinders regional attainment of the WEF nexus, there are considerable efforts that has been put in place either individually or as collaborations to aid in developing resilience as far as effects of climate change and other associated issues are concerned.

  • a) Kenya’s energy reform policies has enhanced the adoption of friendly policies that has accelerated the transition of clean energy adoption [Kazimierczuk 2019].

  • b) Through the formulation of policies and sector coordination for the adoption of modernization of agricultural practices such as use of modern irrigation techniques is geared towards sustainable agriculture and resilience in the wave of climate change [Kanda and Lutta 2022].

  • c) Establishment of comprehensive policies for effective and practical management of disaster, promotes prevention, preparedness, mitigation, responses and recoveries during unforeseen events thereby enhancing resilience to cope with the adverse climatic situations.

  • d) The urgent call for the increased forest covers as to mitigate the adverse effects of deforestation is of importance as this will reduce the risks of extreme desertification. A good example is the presidential directives and Kenya’s Government commitment to plant about 2 billion trees by the year 2022 [Ngounou 2020].

Conclusion

The purpose of this review article was to enhance the understanding of the WEF nexus status and prospects in the Great Lakes Region’s countries of Democratic Republic of Congo, Kenya, Rwanda and Uganda. The study has revealed that there is general insecurity of water, energy and food in the focus countries discussed which has a corresponding trend in the whole region. The challenges are arising from the climate and human induced stresses that significantly affects their usefulness for the well-being of the ecosystem.

There is general impact of the WEF nexus in the region by climate change resulting from droughts that contributes to reduction of energy, food and water availability and on the other hand excessive precipitation that leads to flooding and destruction of property leading to losses and deaths.

There is need for concerted efforts in improving the energy access and availability by utilizing low-cost technologies to provide isolated rural areas with electricity. The use of hydrokinetic river turbine is a promising technology considering that these regions have plenty of free-flowing rivers whose kinetic energy can be fully utilized for electricity generation. Due to the irregular rainfall distribution being experienced in the focus countries, there is need for rainwater harvesting and storage options that would enhance water availability for irrigation purposes.

A comparative analysis of the this review paper and with the study by Kanda et al. [2023], though having considered two different regional blocks within the SSA and having different level of development and WEF nexus interlinks reveals that both the regions are severely WEF insecure in their own capacities. However, a holistic view can be drawn in terms of WEF for the further scrutiny and possible concerted efforts to provide solution that will result to a common objective (considering bordering countries).

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 1
VERSION 1 PUBLISHED 21 Apr 2023
Comment
Author details Author details
Competing interests
Grant information
Copyright
Download
 
Export To
metrics
Views Downloads
F1000Research - -
PubMed Central
Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.
- -
Citations
CITE
how to cite this article
Awandu W, Mukolwe MM, Lusweti E and Kanda EK. Water-energy-food nexus in the Great Lakes Region of Africa: Current status and prospects [version 1; peer review: 1 approved with reservations, 2 not approved]. F1000Research 2023, 12:428 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.132230.1)
NOTE: If applicable, it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
track
receive updates on this article
Track an article to receive email alerts on any updates to this article.

Open Peer Review

Current Reviewer Status: ?
Key to Reviewer Statuses VIEW
ApprovedThe paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approvedFundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions
Version 1
VERSION 1
PUBLISHED 21 Apr 2023
Views
4
Cite
Reviewer Report 14 Aug 2023
Krishna Mondal, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur, Kharagpur, West Bengal, India 
Approved with Reservations
VIEWS 4
I have read with interest the paper entitled “Water-energy-food nexus in the Great Lakes Region of Africa: Current status and prospects”. The paper reports upon reviewing the WEF in the Great Lakes region of Africa with a focus on Kenya, ... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
Mondal K. Reviewer Report For: Water-energy-food nexus in the Great Lakes Region of Africa: Current status and prospects [version 1; peer review: 1 approved with reservations, 2 not approved]. F1000Research 2023, 12:428 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.145138.r189051)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
Views
5
Cite
Reviewer Report 25 Jul 2023
Rodrigo A. Bellezoni, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, State of Minas Gerais, Brazil;  Center for Territorial Intelligence (CIT), Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil 
Not Approved
VIEWS 5
The manuscript aims at reviewing the WEF in the Great Lakes region of Africa with a focus in Kenya, Democratic Republic of Congo, Rwanda and Uganda. However, the text is limited to listing the characteristics of the study sites. Thus, the ... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
Bellezoni RA. Reviewer Report For: Water-energy-food nexus in the Great Lakes Region of Africa: Current status and prospects [version 1; peer review: 1 approved with reservations, 2 not approved]. F1000Research 2023, 12:428 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.145138.r189069)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
Views
11
Cite
Reviewer Report 04 Jul 2023
Hubert Hirwa, Key Laboratory of Ecosystem Network Observation and Modeling, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, University of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, Beijing, China 
Fabien Muhirwa, Institute Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research,, University of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, Beijing, China 
Not Approved
VIEWS 11
The paper is conducted based on the concept of the Water-Energy-Food (WEF) nexus and encourages researchers and practitioners on the benefits of using such a concept. It is not clear however to understand what is the nexus about and how ... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
Hirwa H and Muhirwa F. Reviewer Report For: Water-energy-food nexus in the Great Lakes Region of Africa: Current status and prospects [version 1; peer review: 1 approved with reservations, 2 not approved]. F1000Research 2023, 12:428 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.145138.r181914)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 1
VERSION 1 PUBLISHED 21 Apr 2023
Comment
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Approved - the paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations - A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approved - fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions
Sign In
If you've forgotten your password, please enter your email address below and we'll send you instructions on how to reset your password.

The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.

Email address not valid, please try again

You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.

You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.

Code not correct, please try again
Email us for further assistance.
Server error, please try again.