Keywords
sanitation, E. coli, colony forming units
sanitation, E. coli, colony forming units
Sanitation and water management is one of the ways to reduce the spread of enteric pathogens in the urban, peri-urban and rural environmental set up. The most affected are children, women and elderly people especially in a rural set up. The approach of a community to sanitation includes factors such as the perception, feelings and practices involved in defecation and urination, and the disposal of this waste. Their attitude is a result of interconnected factors of cognition as a result of knowledge, perception together with feeling and behaviour that leads to action (Rosenzweig et al. 1962). Sanitation solutions such as flush toilet, piped sewer system, ventilated pit latrines, etc., that prevent direct contact with human excrements are considered improved, while others such as bucket latrines, hanging toilets, and open defecation are not (WHO/UNICEF 2010).
The goal of SDG 6.2 is to provide access to adequate, equitable sanitation and hygiene for all and put an end to open defecation especially for girls, women and the vulnerable in the society by 2030 (World Bank 2016). Between 2015 and 2020, the population with safely managed sanitation increased from 47 per cent to 54 per cent and the population with access to handwashing facilities with soap and water in the home increased from 67 per cent to 71 per cent. Rates of progress for these basic services would need to quadruple for universal coverage to be reached by 2030.
Water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) is the cornerstone for health and growth at all stages of life in helping to maintain health and increase in life span. Epidemiological studies has associated poor hygiene practices and lack of water with adverse health outcomes that includes diarrhoeal diseases caused by microorganisms such as E. coli leading to enteric malfunctions that leads to stunted growth. (Pruss-Ustun et al. 2014).
These exposure pathways can be through water bodies, food, utensils, storage tanks, sewerage system, open drains galleys or seepage. Tens of millions of people across the world, most of them children, die of sanitation related illness (WHO/UNICEF 2019).
Permission was sought through the board of postgraduate studies of Meru University of science and technology, The Meru University of Science and Technology Institutional Research Ethics Review Committee (MIRERC) and County government of Marsabit.
The study was carried out in the Turbi ward, North Sub-County of Marsabit County, Kenya, with a population of 23,978 (Kenya National Bureau of Statistics 2019). The populations are mostly Cushitic community practicing a pure nomadic lifestyle. The area has land mass of 10,821 km2, and is located at longitude 38°22′25′′E, latitude 3°20′51′′N. Has tropical dry savanna climate. Map for Turbi ward in Northhorr sub county (Figure 1).
The study employed a cross-sectional study design with an aspect of laboratory analysis. Samples for analysis were collected from dams, pans, camel milk and swabs from milk holding containers. The samples were then transported to the laboratory for analysis. Consent to collect water samples from dams, pans and boreholes was obtained by village elders while milk and swabs from containers consent was given by household heads.
Simple random sampling was conducted to select one village from each center totaling to five villages. Water from dams, pans and boreholes were collected while milk samples were collected from the selected households.
Preparation and analysis of water and milk in the laboratory
Water and milk analysis for most probable number required sterile bottles with MacConkey broth, and Durham tubes for gas collection. Each bottle with sample was appropriately labelled. The water was mixed thoroughly by inverting the bottle many times. The cap of the bottle was removed and the mouth of the bottle flamed. The water samples were then inoculated. After inoculation, the bottles were incubated at 44°C for 24 hours the samples were examined for color change and gas formation.
Biochemical identification of E. coli using Tryptone water
Positive isolates were subjected to biochemical identification using Indole test for E. coli. The test organism was inoculated in a bijou bottle containing 3 mL Tryptone water and incubated at 37°C for 24 hours.
Enumeration of E. coli CFU using colony counter
All samples that were confirmed to have E. coli were subjected to enumeration in order to calculate the colony forming unit. A serial dilution was performed up to 105 for E. coli. Then 100 μL were transferred into plate count agar plates arranged from 100 to105 respectively. They were incubated for 24 hours at 37°C. The plate that had grown distinct colonies were subjected to counting and colony forming unit calculated. Selected plate was placed on a counting chamber and a colony pointer was used to touch the surface where the colony was had grown on the media and all the colonies will be counted. Colony forming unit was obtained by multiplying number of colonies counted times the dilution factor.
All the samples taken from all sampled villages had high E. coli bacteria, indicating extent of faecal contamination in water sources used for domestic purposes. Surface water from dams 20% (n=50) and borehole feed water tanks 20% (n=50) had high positivity of E. coli colonies. Table 1 shows the CFU of water samples. Only three samples tested negative for E. coli; these were in Okola. Turbi dam and Okola pan had high E. coli counts colonies both having high positivity of 10% and 8% (n=50) respectively (Table 1).
The principle finding of this study is predominance of E. coli in all sources; dam, pan and borehole fed water tanks. Environmental samples collected from the water pathways predominately were from dam, pan, trough, borehole, about 86% (n=50) of samples test positive for E.coli, an indicator of bacteria in faecal contamination. Dam, borehole fed water tanks and pans had positivity of 20% (n=50) showing high presence of E. coli colonies (Table 1). Turbi dam and Okolla pan had high E. coli colony numbers, both having high positivity of 1.05×107 and 1.93×104 CFU/mL, respectively, (Table 1); the acceptable E. coli in water for consumption is 10–40 CFU/mL (WHO 2020).
The high presence of E. coli detected in these sources used by Turbi, Okolla, and Kambi Nyoka villages could be attributted to that the fact that the research was conducted during the raining season and, during these periods, pastoralist communities depend solely on surface runoff water that feed the dams and pans. Water from boreholes which is retrieved by pumping appliances, such as the one in the Shurr village, are rarely contaminated, but due to poor management of storage tanks and poor hygiene during household water storage processes, tends to increase the likelihood of E. coli exposure in these source of water.
The results of this study also concur with related study done by Suraja and Raja (2020) on faecal exposure pathways, conducted in low income urban and peri-urban areas that identified contact with open drain water and produce to be the main pathways for exposure both for adults and children. There is limited information and research conducted on exposure pathways among communities that practice a nomadic lifestyle. Due to their mobile lifestyle, the nomadic community lacks basic amenities, such as toilets and safe drinking water (Mohamed 2020). Contamination of water bodies and environment by faecal matter exposes children and adults to water-borne diseases, such as cholera and dysentery.
Milk and milk products are basic foods consumed by people practicing a pastoralist way of life. Milk and milk products are also good media for bacterial growth. Any contamination to these food products affects health and general wellbeing of the population that depend on these food products. Milk samples collected from all manyattas showed contamination with evidence of E. coli. This contamination could be due to use of contaminated water to clean milking utensils and lack of hand washing before milking animals.
The consumption of raw milk is accepted in some pastoralist communities is associated with cultural beliefs and preference (Tumwine et al. 2015). A study conducted by Samwuel Majalija et al. (2020) in Nakasogola, Uganda, observed that 67.8% respondents reported never or rarely washed hands before milking animals. A related study conducted in India by Lingathurai and Vellathurai (2010) reported high presence of E. coli of 1.25×107 CFU/mL in milk samples collected from farmers. This was linked to poor hygiene, handling, transportation and storage that affects quality of raw milk.
Microbial contamination noted from this study indicates that there is poor sanitation in a nomadic lifestyle. This study reaffirms the need for an elaborate sanitation model tailored to the need of pastoralist community to reduce perennial faecal contamination of water sources for the community of the Turbi ward.
BJ: Developed the concept, wrote the project proposal, collected the research data, analyzed the data, and wrote the thesis.
SW: Corrected the concept, provided necessary guidance, and corrections at the proposal writing, data analysis, and thesis writing.
GK: Corrected the concept, provided necessary guidance, and corrections at the proposal writing, data analysis, and thesis writing
CK: Mentorship guidance in writing and corrections
Figshare: Underlying data for “Quantification of microbial risk associated with faecal exposure in a nomadic lifestyle; case study of Turbi ward, Marsabit county”. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.22357084.v1.
Data are available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (CC-BY 4.0).
I thank the Almighty God for bringing me this far. My utmost gratitude is to my immediate family members with special emphasis to my husband for his continuous support and encouragement during my study. I appreciate my lecturers who have paved way during my coursework that has enabled me to accomplish my study. I would like to thank my colleague students and all people who in their own special ways made this research thesis a success.
Views | Downloads | |
---|---|---|
F1000Research | - | - |
PubMed Central
Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.
|
- | - |
Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?
Partly
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?
Yes
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?
Partly
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?
Partly
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?
Yes
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?
Yes
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Reviewer Expertise: Microbiology, zoonotic diseases, One health
Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?
Partly
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?
No
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?
No
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?
No
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?
Partly
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?
Partly
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Reviewer Expertise: Veterinary Medicine, Infectious disease, Food Safety, Veterinary Public Health and Epidemiology
Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?
No
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?
No
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?
No
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?
Partly
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?
Partly
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?
No
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Reviewer Expertise: Veterinary medicine, Veterinary parasitology, Microbiology
Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?
Partly
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?
No
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?
No
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?
No
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?
No
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?
No
References
1. Bancessi A, Catarino L, José Silva M, Ferreira A, et al.: Quality Assessment of Three Types of Drinking Water Sources in Guinea-Bissau.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020; 17 (19). PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full TextCompeting Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Reviewer Expertise: Researcher in microbiology, specializing in food and waterborne diseases
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Invited Reviewers | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |
Version 1 06 Jul 23 |
read | read | read | read |
Provide sufficient details of any financial or non-financial competing interests to enable users to assess whether your comments might lead a reasonable person to question your impartiality. Consider the following examples, but note that this is not an exhaustive list:
Sign up for content alerts and receive a weekly or monthly email with all newly published articles
Already registered? Sign in
The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.
You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.
You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.
If your email address is registered with us, we will email you instructions to reset your password.
If you think you should have received this email but it has not arrived, please check your spam filters and/or contact for further assistance.
Comments on this article Comments (0)