Keywords
Bioconversion, Hermetia illucens, LCA, Sustainable
This article is included in the Agriculture, Food and Nutrition gateway.
Bioconversion, Hermetia illucens, LCA, Sustainable
The popularity of farmed insects as a future source of food, feed, and energy is growing.1–3 Insects have been identified as a viable answer to the worldwide difficulties connected with a shortage of protein sources for feed and food as the world population grows.4 In recent years, there has been considerable growth in the number of research and commercial advances related to the use of insect production in connection to recycling, reduce, and reuse of agri-food system side-streams and waste biomass.5–7 Insects have a higher feed conversion efficiency and fewer greenhouse gas emissions than traditional cattle, as well as a nutritional content that makes them potentially acceptable for food and animal feed.8
Further, the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization has recognized the potential of edible insects to contribute to healthy and sustainable diets and has urged their inclusion in the diets of people all over the globe.9 The black soldier fly (BSF) or Hermetia illucens is a focus species among farmed insects owing to the ability of its larvae (BSFL) to rapidly thrive on various organic waste streams.10,11 The BSFL consumes a vast amount of organic waste and converts it into larval biomass, which may later be converted into animal feeds.12 As commonly employed bio-converter agents for diverse organic waste, the BSFL are often used as feed for poultry and fish because of their high protein content.13 The protein content of the BSFL range from 40–44%, and is rich in amino acid, which is better compared to soybean meal.14 Besides protein and amino acid, dietary BSFL oil is beneficial to enhance feed conversion ratio and increase the incorporation of medium-chain fatty acids into abdominal fat pad and serum antioxidant capacity specifically in broiler chickens.15
Despite several literature sources on economic feasibility and societal acceptability, many unanswered topics remain for academics to investigate. Industrial activities (for example: PT Biomagg, Sinergi Internasional, a BSF farm located in Depok, West Java, Indonesia) will certainly have an impact on the environment, such as changes in the quality of water, soil, and air. To reduce pollution and environmental impacts that occur during the product life cycle, the appropriate method for analyzing is a life cycle assessment (LCA). LCA analysis aims to calculate the environmental load based on an inventory analysis of the use of resources, energy, air, fuel, and others so that the environmental burden can be identified and then analyzed using different alternatives to reduce the impact.16–18 The present study reported to identify and analyze input output based on inventory data from BSFL dried products and determine potential environmental impacts in the form of global warming potential (GWP), acidification (AC), terrestrial eutrophication (TE), fossil fuel depletion (FFE), and ecotoxicity (ET).
The current report is a preliminary study of the life cycle assessment and environmental impact analysis of BSFL farming in producing dried BSFL by using biowaste as a substrate for BSFL. The biowaste was provided from the traditional market, Depok, West Java, Indonesia. The study was located at PT Biomagg Sinergi Internasional, located in Depok, West Java, Indonesia (6°22′48.4″S 106°52′51.7″E). The system boundary (gate-to-gate) is designed for the core process of both processing and production of the dried larva. The present study used the functional unit as 100 kg of dried BSFL, which is an amount of dried BSFL production per cycle. Further, five environmental impact categories, GWP, AC, TE, FFE, and ET were chosen (Figure 1-Left). The following processes were evaluated: 1) biowaste preparation for BSFL substrate, 2) egg hatching to produce baby larvae, 3) bioconversion of biowaste, 4) production of prepupa, and 5) production of the dried larva (Figure 1-Right). Respectively, 1) at biowaste preparation for BSFL substrate, the volume of biowaste (1000 kg) and diesel for crushing biowaste and operation time of chopper machine were recorded. The biowaste was crushed using the chopper machine to homogenize the waste to make it easy to digest for BSFL. Meanwhile, 2) the number of eggs that were hatched (100 g), which were provided from PT Biomagg Sinergi Internasional, and the energy of electricity consumed (0.264 kWh) during the hatching process were noted. The eggs were incubated in the plastic box with crushed biowaste as substrate after they hatched. The egg was incubated for 3 days to produce baby larvae. 3) In the bioconversion of biowaste, the volume of biowaste (1000 kg), mass of baby larvae of BSFL (100 kg) and the energy of electricity consumed (0.264 kWh) were also recorded. Further, 4) the volume of crushed biowaste (1000 kg), baby larva (100 g), and electricity (0.264 kWh) during the production of prepupa were obtained and noted. Finally, 5) the wet prepupa (1000 kg), electricity energy consumed, and hour of microwave used in production of dried prepupa per 100 kg, were kept. All data in step 1–5 was used as life cycle inventory data for measuring impact assessment, as described below, and operation time of chopper machine were recorded.
The data used was starting from biowaste production, biowaste bioconversion, prepupa and frass production, and BSFL dried production. This data was primary data (volume of biowaste and diesel, the number of eggs, mass of baby larvae of BSFL and the energy of electricity consumed) that were directly taken from the PT Biomagg Sinergi Internasional19 and was evaluated using the OpenLCA 1.11.0 (GreenDelta, Berlin), Ecoinvent database version 3.8 (Secondary data) and TRACI 2.1 method based on a gate-to-gate approach. Secondary data such as data biowaste, electricity, diesel, and chopper were obtained from the dataset of Ecoinvent 3.8 database. The Life Cycle Inventory (LCI) involved input waste (biowaste), emissions, and energy consumption of each subprocess, based on the principle of mass balance. The LCI involved input waste (biowaste), emissions, and energy consumption of each subprocess and were based on the principle of mass balance. Meanwhile, the impact environment that includes GWP, AC, TE, FFE, and, ET, were evaluated.
Additionally, all inventory data was obtained and calculated from this facility, except for CH4 and N2O emissions. The published values for CH4 and N2O emissions during BSFL bioconversion were used.20 It was anticipated that residue during bioconversion produced emissions equivalent to ordinary organic waste from home or kitchen garbage. Furthermore, the results of the LCI evaluation may be utilized to examine life cycle impacts such as environmental implications. As previously stated, the relevant inventory resulted in the identification of five environmental impact categories. All methods have been deposited on protocols.io at: https://dx.doi.org/10.17504/protocols.io.8epv5j54dl1b/v1.21
The present report evaluated the LCA and environmental impact analysis of the dried BSFL production from biowaste bioconversion using BSFL in PT Biomagg Sinergi Internasional, Depok, West Java, Indonesia (Table 1).19
The GWP of the BSFL bioconversion system was calculated to be 6.687 kg CO2-eq. The specified amounts were 2.898 kg CO2-eq for dried BSLF production use, 3.239 kg CO2-eq for prepupa production, 0.452 CO2-eq for bioconversion of biowaste, 0.096 kg CO2-eq for eggs BSF hatching, and 0.680 kg CO2-eq for production crushed biowaste. A past study by Salomoneet al.,22 revealed that each 100 kg of food waste/biowaste emits 3.2 kg CO2 equivalent per global warming potential. Meanwhile, the greatest proportion (39.33%) of the overall energy usage was attributable to drying. Salomone, Saija22 also stated that substantial GWP effects were generated by electricity use during the prepupa drying and using the microwave was related with the greatest energy consumption in the dried BSFL production system (Figure 2A).
Meanwhile, acidification (Figure 2B) was often associated with the pollutants which are resulted from N- compounds. The total effect of acidification was 0.029 kg SO2-eq. The present report stated that the emissions from the production of the prepupa process had the greatest influence on acidification. High NH3 emissions during the prepupa production caused a significant acidification burden. Further, the overall effect of NH3 emissions on terrestrial eutrophication was 0.092 kg N-equivalent. During the production of prepupa, emissions of NH3 accounted for most of the emissions, which was 0.0429 kg N-equivalent. In addition, the sum of the effect on fossil fuel depletion was 14.76 MJ surplus. The fossil fuel depletion produced by the production of crushed biowaste was 10.88 MJ surplus, which used a diesel-electric generating set in operating the chopper machine. Finally, the eco-toxicity for the system was 119.264 CTu. The eco-toxicity was related to electricity 66.017 CTu and 1.624 CTu in tap water used.
This brief report revealed the GWP, the effects of acidification, terrestrial eutrophication, and eco-toxicity, bridging a significant information gap regarding the environmental impact of the BSFL bioconversion system. Contribution analysis might assist in locating “hot spots” within the selected environmental impact categories. Electricity and tap water for prepupa production, and electricity consumption for crushing biowaste, were the top three processes in terms of the GWP. This study also reported the environmental impact of the production of 100 kg of dried BSFL using the life cycle assessment method. Environmental impact analyzed includes the potential for global warming potential, acidification, terrestrial eutrophication, fossil fuel depletion, and eco-toxicity with their respective values of 6.687 kg CO2 eq; 0.029 SO2- eq; 0.092 kg N-eq; 14.767 MJ surplus; 119.264 CTUe. The prepupa production is the biggest contributor to global warming potential, acidification, terrestrial eutrophication, and eco-toxicity of all stages in dried BSFL production. It is suggested to use alternative single raw materials for substrate BSFL and another drying method, so that the sustainable BSFL dried production process can be achieved. Another recommendation is optimizing the use of tap water, by tightening the implementation of the SOP for tap water in order to be more economical and efficient for usage in BSFL dried production.
Figshare: Life Cycle Assessment BSF, https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.22224034. 19
This project contains the following underlying data:
• Impact anaylisis assessment.xlsx (Present data shows raw data from the life cycle inventory to assess the impacts of BSFL dried production. The impacts assessment are: Global warming Potential, Acidification, Terestrial Eutrophication, Fossil Fuel Depletion, and Ecotoxicity)
Data are available under the terms of the Creative Commons Zero “No rights reserved” data waiver (CC0 1.0 Public domain dedication).
Protocol.io: Life Cycle Assessment for Black Soldier Fly Larvae Dried Production, https://dx.doi.org/10.17504/protocols.io.8epv5j54dl1b/v1. 21
Data are available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (CC-BY 4.0).
The authors would also like to thank Manajemen talenta Badan Riset dan Inovasi Nasional/National Research and Innovation Agency, especially The Research Center for Sustainable Production System and Life Cycle Assessment and Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Mulawarman University for its support. Our sincere gratitude to all members of Research Centre for Sustainable Production System and Life Cycle Assessment, National Research and Innovation Agency, Indonesia.
Views | Downloads | |
---|---|---|
F1000Research | - | - |
PubMed Central
Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.
|
- | - |
Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?
Yes
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?
Yes
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?
Yes
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?
Not applicable
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?
Yes
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?
Yes
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Reviewer Expertise: Aquatic microbiology; aquaculture
Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?
Yes
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?
Yes
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?
Yes
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?
Not applicable
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?
Yes
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?
Yes
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Reviewer Expertise: Environmental management, Waste Management, Environmental Engineering
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Invited Reviewers | ||
---|---|---|
1 | 2 | |
Version 1 11 Jul 23 |
read | read |
Provide sufficient details of any financial or non-financial competing interests to enable users to assess whether your comments might lead a reasonable person to question your impartiality. Consider the following examples, but note that this is not an exhaustive list:
Sign up for content alerts and receive a weekly or monthly email with all newly published articles
Already registered? Sign in
The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.
You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.
You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.
If your email address is registered with us, we will email you instructions to reset your password.
If you think you should have received this email but it has not arrived, please check your spam filters and/or contact for further assistance.
Comments on this article Comments (0)