ALL Metrics
-
Views
-
Downloads
Get PDF
Get XML
Cite
Export
Track
Study Protocol

Effect of low-intensity plyometrics and eccentric training programs on pain, strength and function in patients with knee osteoarthritis: A randomized control trial protocol

[version 1; peer review: awaiting peer review]
PUBLISHED 19 Jul 2023
Author details Author details
OPEN PEER REVIEW
REVIEWER STATUS AWAITING PEER REVIEW

This article is included in the Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research collection.

Abstract

Meniscus degeneration, synovial inflammation, subchondral bone changes, and cartilage loss serve as the best indicators of osteoarthritis (OA). The most prevalent type of joint conditions, OA, impairs mobility, lowers quality of life, and limits participation in social activities. Although pain is the primary concern for the majority of patients, clinical symptoms also include joint stiffness, discomfort, and dysfunction. There is enough data to draw the conclusion that physiotherapy treatments can reduce knee OA patients’ pain and enhance their functional capabilities. Two treatment methods that are particularly effective and advantageous for people with knee OA are plyometrics and eccentric training programmes. Our study will compare the impact of eccentric training programmes and low-intensity plyometric training programmed on pain, strength, and function in patients with Grade 1 and Grade 2 knee OA. In this study, the following outcome measures will be utilised: the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), and the Two Minute Walk Test, as our final performance measures for pain and function, respectively. We will determine strength by using portable hand-held dynamometers. Through this study, we will be able to create a plyometric training regimen that can be given to individuals with knee osteoarthritis to improve their physical well-being and athletic performance. These training programmes would be highly effective in such patients, in addition to conventional treatment.
Registration number: CTRI/2023/06/053657

Keywords

Knee Osteoarthritis, Physiotherapy, Plyometric Training Program, Eccentric Training Program, Pain, Muscle Strength, functional ability

Introduction

Osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee is a condition that causes sub-chondral sclerosis of the bone, narrowing of the joint space, and osteophyte formation at the edges of the bone.1 The primary symptom of this condition is restricted range of motion and stiffness brought on by pain, joint effusion, and bony enlargements which impairs mobility, lowers quality of life, and prevents social engagement.2 Knee OA, which often affects all three segments of the knee joint, including the medial, lateral, and patellofemoral joint, typically develops gradually over a period of 10 to 15 years and limits daily activities.3 The two types of OA are primary (idiopathic or non-traumatic) and secondary (often brought on by trauma or mechanical misalignment), based on the cause of the condition. The 1957 introduction of the Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) method allows for the categorization of disease severity based on radiographic data.4

The incidence of OA was 28.7% throughout the entire population of 4,680 people in few studies. Higher rates of OA prevalence were observed in those who used western toilets (42.1%), were sedentary (82.9%), were female, and were severely obese. According to the study’s findings, a sizable portion of the population falls below the cut off. For example, K-L grade 1, which is regarded as questionable or borderline in terms of OA diagnosis.5 Although pain is the primary concern for the majority of patients, clinical manifestations also include joint stiffness, discomfort, and malfunction.6 Risk factors include genetics, female sex, prior trauma, advancing age, and obesity.7 The increasing loss of articular cartilage, increased subchondral plate thickness, osteophyte growth at the joint borders, and the emergence of subchondral bone cysts are some of the distinctive structural changes in OA.8

Physiotherapy, which uses a range of techniques, is a non-surgical treatment option for treating OA. Physiotherapy treatments may aid those with knee OA in experiencing less pain and having better function, according to enough evidence.9 Along with other exercises that can be used to enhance the knee muscles, plyometrics and eccentric training programmes can be used to reduce knee pain, increase functional capacity, and increase muscle strength. The stretch-shortening cycle, a frequently seen occurrence involving a fast lengthening of a muscle tendon unit, is one of the benefits of plyometric activities.10 When a load is applied during eccentric exercises, the musculotendinous unit lengthens.11 As a result, patients with knee osteoarthritis could benefit from either of these exercise programmes to lessen their pain and improve their lower limb functional ability and strength.

Several outcome indicators will be used in our study to assess the effectiveness of the training activities. The end measures we used in this trial for pain and function were the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), and the Two Minute Walk Test (2MWT). With the use of handheld dynamometers, we will measure strength.

Numerous studies have examined the effects of various physiotherapy techniques on patients with knee OA. Two treatments that are particularly effective and advantageous for people with knee OA are plyometrics and eccentric training programmes. Numerous studies have shown that eccentric training programmes combined with traditional physiotherapy are useful for treating knee OA in patients. The utilisation of a plyometric training programme in people with knee OA is not directly supported by any data, although there haven’t been many studies that used plyometric exercise as part of a therapeutic plan.

Our study compares the effects of eccentric training programmes and low intensity plyometrics on pain, strength, and function in patients with Grade 1 and Grade 2 knee OA. Through this study, we will create a plyometric exercise programme that can be provided to people with knee OA to help them feel better physically and perform better. These training programmes together with traditional exercise sessions will be quite helpful in such patients.

Aim and objectives of the study

  • 1. To assess the impact of low-intensity plyometric exercise training program in Grade 1 and Grade 2 knee OA patients on pain (Visual Analogue Scale), strength (Hand Held Dynamometer), and function (WOMAC, Two Minute Walk Test).

  • 2. To assess the impact of eccentric exercise training programmes in Grade 1 and Grade 2 knee OA patients on pain (Visual Analogue Scale), strength (Hand Held Dynamometer), and function (WOMAC, Two Minute Walk Test).

  • 3. To compare the effects of Plyometric Training programs and Eccentric Training programs in Grade 1 and Grade 2 knee OA patients on pain (Visual Analogue Scale), strength (Hand Held Dynamometer), and function (WOMAC, Two Minute Walk Test).

Trial design

This study will be a single-centre, two arm parallel superiority randomized control trial.

Protocol

After obtaining approval from the institutional ethics committee of Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Deemed to be University, the participants will be gathered from the Physiotherapy OPD of Acharya Vinoba Bhave Rural Hospital Sawangi, Meghe, Wardha, Maharashtra. Before the study is started, participants will be informed of its goals and methods, and they will be required to sign written patient consent forms. Patients who match the inclusion and exclusion criteria and have Grade 1 or Grade 2 knee OA are going to be included in the analysis. Simple random selection will be used to divide them into Group A and Group B. A total of 40 participants will be in each group. Computer Generated Random Number system will be used for the randomisation process. Sequentially Numbered Opaque Sealed Envelope Method will be used for sample allocation. The study will be monitored by a departmental committee comprising PG Guide, Head of Department (HOD) Principal of Ravi Nair Physiotherapy College (RNPC) and member of Research Guidance Cell. We will ensure that the patients adhere well to the recommended treatment through regular treatment sessions. If needed, patients will be counselled or contacted telephonically for a reminder about the therapy sessions. The outcome measures will be evaluated before the analysis starts and after it is concluded. The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Hand Held Dynamometer, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) and the two-minute walk test (2MWT) are among of the tools used to measure pain, lower limb muscle strength and functional ability. Along with conventional treatment for pain, muscle strength, and functional ability, Group A will also undergo a plyometric exercise programme. Along with conventional treatments for pain, muscle strength, and functional ability, Group B will also receive an eccentric training programme. Figure 1 depicts the study’s design in visual form.

c9736fee-343b-464c-91c0-dbe831b9e09f_figure1.gif

Figure 1. Flowchart of study design.

Inclusion criteria

  • 1. Patients who are 40 to 50 years of age.

  • 2. There should be both male and female patients.

  • 3. People who have been diagnosed with OA of Grade 1 or Grade 2 according to the Kellgren and Lawrence classification method.

  • 4. Patients who are interested to take part in the study.

Exclusion criteria

  • 1. Patients with trauma-related knee injuries.

  • 2. Patients suffering from different neurological diseases.

  • 3. Patients with limb length differences.

  • 4. Patients who have irreversible limb deformities.

  • 5. Patients with pain referrals.

  • 6. Patients who have had intraarticular injections.

Interventions

Groups A and B will receive the physiotherapy intervention for a total of six weeks. Three days a week will be dedicated to the intervention. Both Group A and Group B will undergo standard physiotherapy treatment. The exercise regimens will consist of two to four sets at 60 to 70 percent of 1 repetition maximum (RM) and eight to 12 repetitions each. Group A will also undergo traditional treatment and a programme of low-intensity plyometric training. Group B will additionally get the eccentric training programme in addition to the traditional treatment. Table 1 explains the conventional treatment that will be administered to the patients.

Table 1. Conventional treatment regimen.

RationaleRegimenDosage
To educate the patientThe patient will receive education on the symptoms of OA, how to manage them, and how to protect their joints while staying active.At the start of the treatment plan
To decrease painInterferential Therapy (IFT)Parameters- Frequency = 4000 Hz, base = 90 Hz, sweep = 40 Hz, Beat frequency = 90-130 Hz, quadripolar, duration = 10-20 minutes, IFT output intensity was increased until the “normal” tingling was encountered by the patient.23
To enhance functional control and muscular performancea) Exercises for Quadriceps: Quad sets
Multiple-Angle Isometric Short-Arc Terminal Extension
b) Exercises for Hamstrings: Hamstring Sets
Multiple-Angle Isometric Exercises for Hamstrings24
2 to 4 sets with 8 to 12 repetitions25
To promote range of motion and flexibilityPassive and Self Stretching techniques for Quadriceps and Hamstrings243 reps with 30 sec hold24

Experimental group

Plyometric training program:

  1. Plyometric training comprises the stretch-shortening cycle (SSC), which uses a stretching action (eccentric) that is quickly accompanied by a shortening movement (concentric).12 The low-intensity plyometric training programme is depicted in Table 2.

Table 2. Low – intensity plyometric training program.

Sr. No.ExerciseDescription
1.FRONT CONE HOP TESTA row of six to ten cones or tiny barriers that are eight to twelve inches (20 to 30 cm) tall, positioned three to six feet (91 to 183 cm) apart, and that are six to ten in number. Take a standing stance with your feet shoulder-width apart at the end of the barrier row, with the length of the barrier extended in front of you. Maintaining a shoulder-width distance between your feet, jump over each obstruction, landing on both feet simultaneously. Use a double-arm swing to shorten the distance between each obstacle.12
2.DROP AND FREEZEA 18 to 24 inch high landing box or platform is used. You stand there with both feet on the front edge of the box. One foot is raised and one toe is extended over the border of the box. Drop lock the ankle. Just enough movement of the other knee will allow you to use it to freeze and push your feet out. Attempt to descend to the exact height you are above the surface of the ground. Knees bent, stopped on both feet, halting any further descent at this moment. The development of landing control for all plyometric activities and eccentric strength will be helped by this frozen motion.12
3.30 SECOND BOX DRILLA 30 inches by 20 inches by 12 inches is the size of the box. Stance at the side of the box with your feet shoulder-width apart. Jump on the box, touch down on the other side of the floor, and then leap back up. Continue to jump across the top of the box for the allotted number of touches; each touch counts as one. Utilise the following advice: 30 touches in 30 seconds Training at a low intensity starts.12
4.LATERAL STEP UP JUMPPut your left foot in the centre as you position on one side of the box. Leap to the other side of the box with a double arm swing, landing with the right foot on the roof and the left foot on the ground. To complete this exercise, continuously rock back and forth over the top of the box.26
5.FORWARD STEP UP AND JUMPA position at top of the box. Keeping your right foot in place, take a step down onto the ground with your left foot. Place your right foot first, then your left foot back on the box. Ascend the box now. As you go through these motions, switch legs.26

Control Group

Eccentric training program:

  1. Strength Training can reduce knee pain intensity and leg strength in participants with symptomatic knee OA. When compared to the muscle’s capacity, the eccentric phase is frequently underloaded. The musculotendinous unit is lengthened during eccentric exercises when a load is applied to it (30). The eccentric training programme is depicted in Table 3.

Table 3. Eccentric training program.

Muscles targetedExerciseDescription
For hamstring musclesProne hamstring curlWrap a TheraBand or weight around the affected leg's ankle. Place the TheraBand around both legs if one is being used to give resistance. Cue a 1-2-3 count going up and a 1-2-3-4-5 count going down to impose time under pressure while stretching the leg.27
Exercise ball (or glider) bridge with curlAs you lay on the ground, place the soles of both of your feet (heels) on a stability ball or gliders. Start in the bridge position by lifting your buttocks off the floor while keeping your knees straight. While your heels are on the ball or glider, bend your legs and draw your heels up towards your buttocks. Once your legs are straight, put your buttocks on the ground. Make sure you gradually extend your legs back to their original position to underline the eccentric action. This is done one time only.24
Seated TheraBand hamstring curlMaintain good seated position while putting an exercise band around the ankle that is injured. You must secure the other end of the band to something that is right in front of you. When lowering your leg towards you, cue for a 1-2-3 count. Then, focus on a 1-2-3-4-5 count as you let your leg return to its extended (straightened) posture.24
For quadriceps muscleWall slidesHave the patient stand with their feet front and their shoulders apart, leaning their backs against a wall. Instruct the patient to slide up the wall by extending the hips and knees and plantarflexing the ankles before sliding the back down the wall by flexing the hips, knees, and ankle. Put a towel behind the patient's back if sliding their back up against the wall directly causes them to experience too much friction.24
Unilateral closed-chain terminal knee extensionSecure elastic resistance to a stationary structure by looping it around the distal thigh. While putting some to all of their weight on the affected extremity, have the patient actively do terminal knee extension.24
Partial squats, mini-squats, and short-arc trainingThe patient's knees should first be flexed up to 30 to 45 degrees before being extended. Make progress by holding weights in your hands or utilising elastic resistance put under both of your feet. Instead of pulling back on the femur with the hip extensors, the patient should maintain an upright posture and concentrate on the sensation of the quadriceps muscle contracting.24

Safety outcomes

Adverse events will be reported at each clinic visit.

Outcome measures

Primary outcome measures

  • 1. Reduction in Visual Analogue Scale

    A common, reliable, accurate, and responsive method to determine how much pain someone is feeling is the VAS scale. The tool is made up of horizontal lines that are 10 cm long and has anchor points of 0 (no pain) and 10 (severe pain). The intensity of knee pain is going to be evaluated using a VAS.13

  • 2. Change in Hand-held dynamometer parameters

    Hand-held dynamometers have been mentioned as alternatives. The manual muscle test, which has been used in clinical practise for years, is comparable to these instruments in that it can be done virtually anywhere and is portable, affordable, and helpful almost in any clinical setting. Using this apparatus, the muscle strength of the lower limbs may be effectively assessed.14

  • 3. Change in WOMAC (The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index) Score:

    Since its publication in 1988, the WOMAC Questionnaire has been used to evaluate the health of individuals with osteoarthritis. Including clinical symptoms (five questions), the degree of joint stiffness (two questions), pain intensity (nine questions), and daily activities (17 questions), it consists of 33 items that assess the patient’s health and function from several perspectives.13 Each question has five subscales, with the ideal situation receiving a score of never or none and the worst condition receiving a score of extreme or frequently. Higher scores here suggest a better state and less suffering.15

Secondary outcome measures

  • 1. Change in Two Minute Walk Test Distance (2MWT):

The 2MWT is a test of functional capacity and self-paced walking ability that is especially useful for people who are unable to complete the longer Six Minute Walk Test (6MWT) or 12 Minute Walk Test. The individual is advised to move as quickly as they can for two minutes without help, and the distance covered is measured.16

Sample size calculation

We estimated the sample size using a power analysis with 80% power and 5% Type 1 error for the main variable, the WOMAC score, in comparison to the difference in mean score pre- and post-treatment for the eccentric training group from baseline to end visits. For the study, we used the previously determined effect size difference in percentage from the RCT.17 We anticipated a 20% margin improvement over the control group, which was significant for a clinically relevant margin of superiority at 20% based on expert opinion.

Formula using mean difference

n1=n2=2Zα+Zβ2σ2δ2

Primary variable (WOMAC)

Mean ± SD (pre) result on WOMAC for eccentric training group (pre) = 49.7 ± 17 as per reference article17

Expected clinically relevant superiority 20% result on WOMAC for low intensity plyometric training group (post) = (49.7×20)/100 = 9.94

Difference = 9.94 (As expected)

As per reference article,

N1=2×1.64+0.842172/9.942=36

Total samples required = 40 per Group.

Considering 10% drop out = 4

Total sample size required = 40 per group

Notations:

Zα=1.64
α=Type I error at 5% (at both side) total 10%
Zβ=0.841β=Powerat80%
σ=standard deviation

Reference article: “Concentric or eccentric physical activity for patients with symptomatic osteoarthritis of the knee: a randomized prospective study”.17

Analysis

The results of the quantitative assessment of the demographic data (age, height, weight, and body mass index [BMI]) will be used to determine the minimum and maximum observational values for the mean standard deviation. Calculations for qualitative evaluation will be based on frequency and percentage. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test will be used to determine the normality of the data for inferential statistics. If the distribution of the data for the outcome variable on quantitative measurement follows normal distribution, a parametric test will be conducted. If data follows non-normal distribution, then mathematical algorithms like log function, exponential, or box cox transformation will be used to transform it to normal distribution. If data still continues with non-normal distribution, then an alternate parametric test will be used.

Primary outcome: Using a linear mixed model, inferential statistics will be utilised to compare the mean change in the major variable (VAS, Hand-held Dynamometer, WOMAC) between baseline, six weeks during treatment and one week after completion of the study for follow-up assessment between two groups (Experimental treatment versus Control treatment). Participants will be evaluated for the outcomes taking into account the major variable’s variation from baseline to the study’s timeline (visit 1 and after the conclusion of six weeks and post follow-up at one week after completion of the study) will be measured. A generalised effect model will be run on study subjects to find the effect of treatment, visits and treatment plus visits as fixed variables as well as to find the other random effect of confounding variables like age, sex, hypertension, diabetes and any other co-morbidities. The effect size across mean change difference on the major variable from baseline to end line visit at six weeks and one week after completion of the study will be calculated, along with a matching 95% confidence interval (CI).

Primary end point (Description): The aforementioned linear mixed model impact will be examined to predict the effect size difference between the experimental and control groups for secondary outcomes (2MWT). If the data has a normal distribution, the T-test (Unpaired) will be used to determine whether there is a significant difference between the means in comparison between the two groups. Mathematical procedures will be employed to convert the data from a non-normal distribution to a normal distribution. We will employ an alternative non-parametric test (such as the Chi-square, Mann-Whitney U, or Wilcoxon test) if the data over the major variable still follows a non-normal distribution.

Dissemination

The authors are preparing to present the work in National Conference Proceedings and publish in an index journal.

Study status

The process of recruiting individuals has not yet begun.

Discussion

People all over the world are impacted by the serious medical condition known as OA.18 One of the treatment choices is orthopaedic assistance, along with medication, surgery, and physical therapy.6 OA treatment depends on how serious the disease is. Physical therapy and medication are helpful in the early stages of OA. Muscle strength is increased by exercise, which improves life quality.19 Numerous studies have been conducted to demonstrate the effectiveness of various physiotherapy methods in treating knee OA.20 Similar to this, numerous studies have been conducted on eccentric exercise, demonstrating its usefulness in treating patients with knee OA.21 Low-intensity plyometric training on individuals with knee OA has not been the subject of any studies. Low-intensity plyometric training has been the subject of numerous research on a variety of populations like Anterior Cruciate ligament injury population, etc., but not on knee OA.22 We’ll be able to create a low-intensity plyometric training programme for this group of individuals with the aid of this study. Second, no comparisons between the two aforementioned methodologies have been made. This study will enable us to assess which training programme is more successful with this demographic.

Ethical considerations

Institutional Ethical Committee approval number: DMIHER (DU)/IEC/2023/803

IEC approval date: 21/03/2023

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 1
VERSION 1 PUBLISHED 19 Jul 2023
Comment
Author details Author details
Competing interests
Grant information
Copyright
Download
 
Export To
metrics
Views Downloads
F1000Research - -
PubMed Central
Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.
- -
Citations
CITE
how to cite this article
Somaiya K and Samal S. Effect of low-intensity plyometrics and eccentric training programs on pain, strength and function in patients with knee osteoarthritis: A randomized control trial protocol [version 1; peer review: awaiting peer review]. F1000Research 2023, 12:850 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.136644.1)
NOTE: If applicable, it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
track
receive updates on this article
Track an article to receive email alerts on any updates to this article.

Open Peer Review

Current Reviewer Status:
AWAITING PEER REVIEW
AWAITING PEER REVIEW
?
Key to Reviewer Statuses VIEW
ApprovedThe paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approvedFundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 1
VERSION 1 PUBLISHED 19 Jul 2023
Comment
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Approved - the paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations - A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approved - fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions
Sign In
If you've forgotten your password, please enter your email address below and we'll send you instructions on how to reset your password.

The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.

Email address not valid, please try again

You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.

You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.

Code not correct, please try again
Email us for further assistance.
Server error, please try again.