Keywords
Education model, Management Approach, Competency, Diabetes Nurse Educator, King's Conceptual, Goal Attainment
Education for diabetes patients is not managed well by diabetes nurse educators because the competency of diabetes nurse educators is low, and the number of diabetes nurse educators in hospitals is not commensurate with the number of diabetes patients, which is much larger.
This qualitative phenomenological research uses an exploratory design. Twenty nurse managers and forty staff nurses who participated in the focus group discussion (FGD) were selected using purposive sampling. Nine staff nurses who participated in in-depth interviews were selected using the snowball method. The results of the FGD exploration and in-depth interviews produced components for developing an educational model with a management approach. The development of this educational model uses an input, process, output, and outcome approach. The input uses King’s conceptual framework approach, the method uses the theory of goal attainment and management functions, the output is the competency of nurses to educate diabetes patients, and the outcome is the health literacy of diabetes patients. This educational model was reviewed by three experts: a nursing management expert, a diabetes mellitus expert, and a health literacy expert.
The educational model for Diabetes nurse educators with a management approach consists of five stages: 1) Educational planning includes identifying educational targets, strategy formulation, and situation analysis. 2) Organizing nursing resources includes strengthening the role of nurses as diabetes educators. 3) Nursing staff includes intraprofessional collaboration and collaboration between nurses and patient families. 4) Direction includes nurses’ motivation for diabetes patients and respecting the culture and values of diabetes patients. 5) Control includes evaluating nurse education for diabetes patients.
This education model has five competencies, which are structured and systematic so that diabetes nurse educators have the competence to manage diabetes patient education: the personal system, interpersonal system, and social system influence nurse competency.
Education model, Management Approach, Competency, Diabetes Nurse Educator, King's Conceptual, Goal Attainment
Diabetes educator nurses have an essential role in diabetes management education. Nurses have a precise position to educate diabetes patients because they accompany them more often than other professionals (Schwarzkopf et al., 2024). Education is a fundamental responsibility for nurses (Khazhymurat et al., 2023) so that diabetes patients have the knowledge and skills to live life (Clemens et al., 2021), fast well (Carroll, 2023), prevent acute and chronic complications (Yeşil & Çövener Özçelik, 2024).
Diabetes nurse educators should have good competence in managing diabetes patient education (Khazhymurat et al., 2023) because it must provide information that is relevant to the patient’s condition (Anderson et al., 2021), evidence-based (Hecht et al., 2021), teaches survival skills (Ergun-Longmire et al., 2021), to take appropriate action (Pueyo-Garrigues et al., 2022). Diabetes nurse educators must have good communication (Khazhymurat et al., 2023), always motivate diabetes patients (Al Nadhiri et al., 2023), and be respectful and culturally sensitive (Korsah et al., 2022). In addition, they can work together with patients and families to increase patient compliance with the instructions taught (Taibanguay et al., 2019).
The limited number of diabetes educator nurses in hospitals is inconsistent with the much larger number of diabetes patients (Dickinson et al., 2021). The high work demands of diabetes educator nurses mean that education for diabetes patients is not managed well. The education for diabetes patients is not managed well due to the low competency of diabetes nurse educators to manage diabetes patient education (Hecht et al., 2021), so an educational model with a management approach is required. Suppose you integrate the management function into the education management of diabetes patients. In that case, the diabetes nurse educator works in a structured, systematic manner because the management function guides the diabetes educator nurse to carry out education at each stage, measure efficiency, and evaluate results (Piplica et al., 2024). Management of diabetes patient education requires in-depth understanding and an appropriate educational model for diabetes nurse educators. Therefore, research is needed to explore educational models with approaches so that management nurses have diabetes educator competence. Based on this phenomenon, researchers are interested in developing an educational model with a management approach that impacts the competency of diabetes nurse educators.
This research with Qualitative phenomenological uses an exploratory design approach to explore nurses’ experiences in educating diabetes patients. The results of FGD exploration and in-depth interviews produced components for developing an educational model for diabetes nurse educators using a management approach. The development of this educational model uses an input, process, output, and outcome approach. The input uses King’s conceptual framework approach, the method uses the Theory of Attainment Goals and Management Functions, the output is the competency of nurses to educate diabetes patients, and the outcome is the Health Literacy of diabetes patients. The education model for nurse educators with a management approach was reviewed by three experts: a nursing management expert, a diabetes mellitus expert, and a health literacy expert. This process ensures that the research is high quality and reliable.
We selected participants for the focus group discussion (FGD) and in-depth interviews from three government hospitals located in three regencies in Indonesia: Hospital X in Palopo City, Hospital Y in Luwu Utara Regency, and Hospital Z in Soppeng Regency. We divided the focus group discussions (FGDs) at each hospital into two sessions: Session 1 for nurse managers, which included the top manager, middle manager, and first-line manager. Session 2 was for Staff Nurses. The FGD was conducted in a closed room, so those present were the FGD participants.
The researcher and participants had no previous working relationship. Participants were selected using the purposive sampling method. For nurse managers with the following inclusion criteria: 1) minimum two years of work experience in their field 2) minimum Bachelor’s Degree education. For staff nurses with the following inclusion criteria: 1) minimum level of Clinical Nurse II, 2) minimum education of D3 in nursing, and 3) work in the Diabetes patient care room. Selection of participants based on recommendations from hospital management.
The in-depth interview participants were staff nurses. The selection of participants used the Snowball Sampling technique. This method starts with one participant, who the first-line manager will recommend. Inclusion criteria are: 1) minimum level of Clinical Nurse II, 2) minimum education of D3 in nursing, and 3) working in a DM patient care room. The determination of participants rolled like a snowball. We stop data collection if the data shows saturation. Interviews were conducted face-to-face using a semi-structured method. Interview time 60-90 minutes/participant. Researchers use a recorder.
The first author conducted a focus group discussion (FGD) in July-December 2022. The first author was the moderator in the focus group discussion (FGD). The interviewers were the first author, a male, nursing doctoral student, a lecturer, and a nursing manager at the hospital. The first author has attended several trainings on qualitative research to support this research, such as qualitative research methods using Atlas.ti, Qualitative Research N-Vivo 12, and qualitative research using netnography.
In focus group discussions (FGD), researchers use key questions as a guide. Researchers assume that the key questions used are very effective in eliciting information from participants because supervisors have reviewed the key questions.
The focus group discussion (FGD) interview results were verbatim, analyzed, and reviewed by the supervisor. After obtaining supervisor approval, the focus group discussion (FGD) continued at the next hospital.
After completing the focus group discussion (FGD) at three hospitals, in-depth interviews continued. Interviews were conducted in a semi-structured manner using an interview guide. Each participant was interviewed individually, face to face, lasting 60-90 minutes. Participants could request a break or reschedule the following interview as needed. After asking questions, the researcher allowed participants to share their experiences. After that, the researcher also clarified and developed queries as required. The researcher used a recording device to help interview participants. There was no repetition of interviews in this study. We reached data saturation with the 9th participant, and as there was no further information, no additional participants were recruited.
To increase the credibility of participant data, researchers strive to meet the criteria, namely credibility, dependability, confirmability, transferability, and authenticity. The first author recorded, transcribed, and coded all interview sessions. Researchers used field notes to record non-verbal participant responses if necessary. The transcribed data were returned to participants for confirmation and clarification before the data were explained. We analyzed all data using inductive thematic analysis, which included six stages: recognizing and transcribing data, coding data, compiling themes, reviewing prepared themes, naming and defining themes, and reporting results (Braun et al., 2019). Data from focus group discussions (FGD) and in-depth interviews were analyzed using the NVIVO Plus application.
Twenty nurse managers from three hospitals participated in focus group discussions (FGD). All participants were married. 13-28 years of work experience. Education levels are bachelor’s degree and master’s degree. Forty staff nurses from three hospitals participated in this study. All participants were married. 5-21 years of work experience. Education level is D3 and bachelor’s degree. All staff nurses in the treatment room care for diabetes patients. Level clinical nurse levels II and III. There were no participants who refused to take part in this research.
Nine staff nurses from three hospitals participated in in-depth interviews. All participants were married. 9-13 years of work experience. All education levels are bachelor’s degrees. All staff nurses in the room care for diabetes patients, level clinical nurse levels II and III. There were no participants who refused to take part in this research.
Thematic analysis of the data collected revealed five themes: 1) Educational planning, 2) Organization of nursing resources, 3) Nurse staffing, 4) Nurse direction, and 5) Educational control. These five themes form the basis components of developing an educational model (Table 1).
The five themes are components of developing an educational model with a management approach integrated with King’s conceptual framework, Theory of Attainment Goals (King, 2016), and management theory. The development of this educational model begins with creating a draft educational model that uses an input, process, output, and outcome approach. The input uses King’s conceptual framework approach, the method uses the Theory of Attainment Goals and Management Functions, the output is the competency of nurses to educate diabetes patients, and the outcome is the health literacy of diabetes patients. Draft an educational model with a management approach (Figure 1).
The input stage integrates three things, namely patients, nurses, and the hospital environment, using King’s conceptual framework approach, namely the Nurse’s personal system, the interpersonal system between nurses and diabetes patients, and the social system, namely the hospital environment, hospital management policies, culture and the role of the patient’s family. This approach emphasizes that education does not only consider the patient’s condition but also involves the crucial role of nurses as diabetes educators, as well as aspects of the hospital environment and hospital management, as well as local culture/wisdom.
The process stage of integrating education with a management approach and Goal Attainment Theory includes perception, reaction, interaction, and transaction. This stage illustrates that implementing education with a management approach requires a perception. Diabetic patients provide perceptions to diabetes nurse educators, and communication transactions will occur between nurses and diabetes patients if both are actively involved in achieving goals. The output is on the competency of nurses to educate diabetes patients, and the outcome is an increase in the health literacy of diabetes patients.
The educational model with a management approach has a core circle as the central position, surrounded by five circles, and each circle’s colour has a meaning. The educational model with a management approach has a core circle as the central position, surrounded by five circles, and each circle’s colour has a meaning. In the circle, the Nurse’s competence in educating diabetes patients is placed in a central position. The circle’s core is white, which indicates the sincerity of the diabetes nurse educator in carrying out education. The first circle contains five competencies that diabetes nurse educators must have following the management function.
Outside the circle, three systems influence the competence of diabetes nurse educators. 1) Personal nurse system: nurses’ commitment as diabetes educators, skills of nurses as educators, motivation of nurses, workload of nurses, work management of nurses, perceptions, reactions, interaction, and communication of nurses. 2) Interpersonal system: the relationship between diabetes nurse educators and patient, patient culture. 3) Social System: hospital environmental conditions, hospital management policies regarding nurse training as diabetes educators. Figure of an educational model with a management approach (Figure 2).
An educational model with a management approach is used to improve the competency of diabetes nurse educators. There are five competency stages arranged systematically and structured, namely 1) Educational planning includes identification of educational targets, strategy formulation, and situation analysis. 2) Organizing nursing resources includes strengthening the role of nurses as diabetes educators. 3) Nurse staffing includes intraprofessional and nurse collaboration with patient families. 4) Direction includes nurse motivation for diabetes patients and respecting patient culture and values. 5) Controlling includes evaluating nurse education for diabetes patients.
Planning education by identifying educational targets, diabetes nurse educators are guided to 1) identify the demographics of diabetes patients (Ojurongbe et al., 2024) such as educational background, religion, ethnicity (Anwar et al., 2020), type of health insurance the patient has, employment, social status (Vamos & McDermott, 2021), address (village or city) (Aljassim & Ostini, 2020), age, especially the elderly, (Vafopoulou et al., 2024), patient room (Class III/ward, Class II, Class I, VIP). 2) Identifying patient health literacy using a questionnaire (Voigt-Barbarowicz & Brütt, 2020). 3) Identifying the patient’s ability to read and speak Indonesian (Muscat et al., 2021). Educational planning by identifying educational targets. Because each patient has different educational needs, diabetes nurse educators must identify educational targets so that educational planning is appropriate to the patient’s needs. In addition, the approach used is relevant and in accordance with the patient’s learning preferences.
Planning education by formulating strategies, diabetes nurse educators are guided to 1) determine the educational goals to be achieved (Ravik et al., 2023), 2) determine educational methods that are appropriate to the patient’s condition (Meyer et al., 2024), 3) determine the suitable educational media (Farooq et al., 2024), 4) determine the right educational time (Liao et al., 2023), 5) determine educational material (LaVela et al., 2022). Educational planning utilizes strategy formulation because it directs diabetes nurse educators to use appropriate strategies to increase learning effectiveness. Patients easily understand and apply the information taught.
In educational planning using situation analysis, the diabetes nurse educator is guided to 1) Analyze the situation from the diabetes patient’s perspective, such as pain problems (Zammit et al., 2023), anxiety (Shang et al., 2024), the patient’s experience of suffering from diabetes mellitus, the patient’s enthusiasm for receiving education (Linnavuori et al., 2024). 2) Analyzing the situation from the Nurse’s side includes the Nurse’s commitment as a diabetes educator to mastery of educational material (De Bellis et al., 2020). 3) Analyze the situation from the hospital environment, such as a quiet educational room, an educational room free from interference from other people, and facilities that support the implementation of education (Linnavuori et al., 2024). Educational planning is done by analyzing the situation of diabetes patients, diabetes educator nurses, and the hospital environment. The diabetes patients, diabetes educator nurses, and the hospital environment, are like a circle. The patient is the centre of education, and the diabetes educator nurse is the facilitator, whose quality and commitment influence the education process and results. A conducive hospital environment facilitates an effective education process.
Organizing nursing resources by strengthening the role of nurses as diabetes educators. Diabetes educator nurses are guided to 1) Manage their work so that every diabetes patient receives sufficient education (Linnavuori et al., 2024). 2) Sorting educational materials with other health professions (Teuwen et al., 2024). Organizing nursing resources by strengthening the role of nurses as diabetes educators so that diabetes educator nurses organize their work according to a priority scale. The priority scale can use patient flow management, namely information gathering, continuous triage, resource management, throughput management, and care oversight (Benjamin, 2024).
Staffing, diabetes educator nurses are guided to 1) Collaborate intraprofessionally, and work solidly with other nurses (Weber et al., 2022). 2) Collaborate with the patient’s family (Vinarski-Peretz et al., 2023). Intraprofessional collaboration is needed to coordinate, share information regarding patient progress, adopt an integrated approach, and motivate each other. Nurses collaborate with patient families to support patients in making the right decisions.
Directing, the diabetes nurse educator is guided to 1) Motivate diabetes patients. Build positive relationships with patients in education (Zhao et al., 2023). 2) Respect patient culture and values (Maboko et al., 2024). 3) Educate patients using simple, easy-to-understand language and avoiding medical terms (Kovach & Pollonini, 2022). Diabetes nurse educators build positive and supportive relationships with patients. Nurses provide emotional support and appreciation if patients make progress. Nurses must be empathetic, active listeners and understand the concerns felt by patients. In addition, nurses must understand the patient’s culture and adapt educational methods and nursing interventions that align with the patient’s values and culture as long as they do not conflict with nursing theory. Nurses must maintain patient comfort in the education process.
Controlling, diabetes nurse educators are guided to 1) evaluate using the teach-back method (Hong et al., 2020); 2) repeat educational material if the patient shows signs of not understanding (Berghout, 2021); 3) complete documentation (Everett-Thomas et al., 2021). The teach-back method is used to ensure diabetes patients understand the information that has been taught. The patient is asked to repeat the information that has been trained using the patient’s own words. If the patient does not understand, the Nurse repeats the material that the patient does not understand. After completing the education, the Nurse documents the education process and the results of the educational Attainment s using a documentation sheet.
King’s conceptual system influences all stages of diabetes nurse educator competency. A system is a series of components connected through communication links that exhibit purposeful and directed behaviour (King, 2016). The three interacting systems (Nurse, patient, and environment) determine the physical and social environment in which humans operate (King, 2016). Educational planning is influenced by the Nurse Personal System, namely the commitment of nurses as educators, and influenced by the Nursing Social System, namely the atmosphere of the hospital/room environment and hospital management policy. The main focus of the Personal System is the individual as a unique and complex entity, considering personal characteristics, health needs, and environmental adaptation (King, 2016).
The organization of nursing resources is influenced by the Nurse Personal System, namely Nurse workload and Nurse job management. A high workload can cause burnout (Nining et al., 2024), and the quality of education decreases. Hospital management considers the number of diabetes educator nurses according to the number of diabetes patients and provides professional development training opportunities. Work management requires solid communication among team members.
The nursing staff is influenced by the Nurse Interpersonal System, namely the relationship between diabetes educator nurses and diabetes patients and cultural influences. The relationship between the diabetes nurse educator and the patient requires a balance between the diabetes educator nurse and the patient. Both must support each other, have the same enthusiasm, and utilize the culture of Sipakatau, Sipakalebbi, and Sipakainge. Sipakatau is mutual respect and respect for each other’s roles. Sipakalebbi is mutual glorification. Nurses glorify patients as individuals who need information, and patients glorify nurses as providers of nursing services. Sipakainge is a mutual reminder. The Nurse reminds the patient about diabetes management, and the patient conveys the desired educational needs.
Directing is influenced by the Nurse’s personal system, namely nurse communication. Nurses communicate with patients, from perception, reactions, interactions, and transactions to goal attainment (King, 2016). The Nurse’s perception of the patient’s situation, condition, and needs, getting a reaction to the information obtained. Information exchange occurs between diabetes nurse educators and diabetes patients (interaction) so that communication happens. Nurses communicate with empathy and a patient-centric approach. They are building a relationship of mutual trust and openness. Educational control is influenced by the Nurse’s Personal System, namely the integrity of nurses. The integrity of the diabetes nurse educator shows that all educational processes are documented accurately and completely. Nurses have strong work morals, tenacity, and consistency.
This research is related to the culture of nurse educators and diabetes patients. Participants in this research came from tribes in Eastern Indonesia. The limitation of this research is that none of the participants came from tribes in western Indonesia.
Practical Implications: 1) The results of this research can be a practical guide for diabetes nurse educators or general nurses in hospitals to educate diabetes patients. 2) The research results can be a practical guide for nursing and medical students to learn about patient education in educational institutions.
Policy implications; 1) The results of this research can be used as consideration for hospital management to revise standard operational procedures (SPO) regarding diabetes patient education.
1. Expand sample variations in terms of participant culture.
2. Test the output of this educational model, namely the competency of diabetes nurse educators, including knowledge, skills, and abilities (instruments available).
3. Test the outcome of this educational model, namely the health literacy of diabetes patients (instruments available).
This research has been approved by the Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Nursing, University of Indonesia, as proven by a Certificate of Passing Ethical Review Number KET-136/UN2.F12.D1.2.1/PPM.00.02/2022 dated 30 May 2022. In the research, participants voluntarily Signed the consent form before participating in this study. Researchers explain participants’ aims, benefits, risks of harm, rights, and obligations through a research explanation sheet. Researchers apply three primary ethical principles: respect for human dignity, beneficence and nonmaleficence, and the principle of justice.
Participants know that this research aims to develop an educational model for nurses. Researchers provide participants with a detailed explanation of the research objectives, procedures, potential risks, and benefits. The researcher assured the participant that his participation was voluntary, that he could humble himself at any time, and that it would not affect his performance assessment. We also encouraged participants to ask questions before providing consent.
Figshare: Development of an educational model with a management approach to improve the competency of diabetes educator nurses; utilizing King’s conceptual framework and goal attainment theory, https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.26779138.v2 (Asriadi, 2024).
This project contains the following data:
Figshare: Development of an educational model with a management approach to improve the competency of diabetes educator nurses; utilizing King’s conceptual framework and goal attainment theory. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.26779138.v2 (Asriadi, 2024).
This project contains the following data:
Data are available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (CC-BY 4.0).
We are unable to share the transcript files and recordings due to an agreement with the participants, as stipulated and agreed upon in the informed consent and research explanation. These measures are implemented to uphold the integrity and confidentiality of the data, in accordance with research ethics standards. This is especially crucial as the participant statements contain sensitive content. The data supporting the findings of this study are available upon request from the corresponding author [adiasriadi99@gmail.com]. Access to the data will be granted to qualified researchers upon reasonable request and after signing a data use agreement. The data may only be used for academic and research purposes in accordance with relevant ethical approvals. Any request for data use beyond these purposes must receive additional approval from the corresponding author.
Thank you to Lembaga Pengelola Dana Pendidikan (LPDP) Indonesia for the scholarship funding provided during our academic studies, which also helped us do this research.
Views | Downloads | |
---|---|---|
F1000Research | - | - |
PubMed Central
Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.
|
- | - |
Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?
Yes
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?
Yes
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?
Yes
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?
Yes
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?
Yes
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?
Yes
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Reviewer Expertise: A faculty member (Prof.Dr) in Internal Medicine Nursing, I have also been working in the field of Diabetes Education Nursing in Turkey for 30 years and I am the President of the Turkish Diabetes Nursing Association. In Turkey, we are also conducting studies using nursing concepts and theories, as in this article, to develop Diabetes Education Nursing. I think it is a sample research article for diabetes education nurses.
Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?
Partly
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?
Partly
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?
No
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?
Not applicable
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?
Partly
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?
Yes
References
1. Shaban MM, Sharaa HM, Amer FGM, Shaban M: Effect of digital based nursing intervention on knowledge of self-care behaviors and self-efficacy of adult clients with diabetes.BMC Nurs. 2024; 23 (1): 130 PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full TextCompeting Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Reviewer Expertise: Nursing , geriatric, community health, public health, agieng , epidemiology
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Invited Reviewers | ||
---|---|---|
1 | 2 | |
Version 1 06 Sep 24 |
read | read |
Provide sufficient details of any financial or non-financial competing interests to enable users to assess whether your comments might lead a reasonable person to question your impartiality. Consider the following examples, but note that this is not an exhaustive list:
Sign up for content alerts and receive a weekly or monthly email with all newly published articles
Already registered? Sign in
The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.
You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.
You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.
If your email address is registered with us, we will email you instructions to reset your password.
If you think you should have received this email but it has not arrived, please check your spam filters and/or contact for further assistance.
Comments on this article Comments (0)