Keywords
COVID-19, vaccine, adverse effects, university students, Thailand
This article is included in the Faculty of Medicine – Thammasat University collection.
Existing data on adverse effects of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines among university students are limited. This study aimed to investigate the characteristics of adverse effects that may arise from administering COVID-19 vaccines to university students in Thailand.
An online survey study was conducted among students from 12 Health Sciences faculties, and from 16 non-Health Sciences faculties of two universities from October 2021 to January 2022 to assess types and adverse effects of COVID-19 vaccines received by the students.
There were 1,439 participating students; 522 (36%) were from Health Sciences faculties, and 917 (64%) were from 16 non-Health Sciences faculties. The types of the first-dose vaccine received were inactivated (49%), viral vector (46%), and mRNA (5%), while the types of the second-dose vaccine received were viral vector (53%), inactivated (40%) and mRNA (7%). The first-dose vaccines’ most common adverse effects of inactivated, viral vector, and mRNA vaccines were muscle pain (47%, 82%, and 58%, respectively). The second-dose vaccines’ most common adverse effects were cough (47%) for inactivated vaccines and muscle pain (49% for viral vector vaccines and 56% for mRNA vaccines). Viral vector vaccines were more likely to cause fever, muscle pain, diarrhoea, headache, and rashes than the others. The mRNA vaccines caused injection site pain more than inactivated vaccines. The majority of adverse effects occurred 24-48 hours after vaccination (68%), were more severe with the first dose compared with the second dose, and resolved spontaneously without any treatment at a hospital.
The adverse effects experienced by the students were various according to the types and number of doses of COVID-19 vaccines. The adverse effects were mostly non-severe and occurred less for the second dose compared with the first dose.
COVID-19, vaccine, adverse effects, university students, Thailand
The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is one of the greatest global threats, with manifestations of acute respiratory syndrome caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus.1 This has led to hospitalizations and deaths since early 2020, with a mortality rate of 1% and a total of more than 6.8 million deaths as of 25 March 2023.2 Vaccination has proven to be an effective preventive measure against COVID-19, reducing its spread and severity.3 In Thailand, there are three major types of vaccine: (1) inactivated vaccines, including CoronaVac and BBIBP-CorV, (2) viral vector (VV) vaccine, including ChAdOx1 nCoV-19, and (3) mRNA vaccines, including BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273.4,5 In February 2021, CoronaVac was implemented as the first official COVID-19 vaccination regimen for populations at risk of COVID-19 and for healthcare workers. Subsequently, VV and mRNA vaccines became available. However, due to the limited supply of the vaccines, alternative primary vaccine regimens of heterologous COVID-19 vaccines including CoronaVac-ChAdOx1 nCoV-19, CoronaVac-BNT162b2, and ChAdOx1 nCoV-19-BNT162b2 have been used since late 2021.6–9 These heterologous COVID-19 vaccine regimens have gained significant interest among the Thai population because there is less evidence of serious adverse events and because they are more accessible.7,10
While university students have less symptomatic COVID-19 infection than other populations, their social interaction increases the possibility of asymptomatic transmission, leading to higher rates of community infections.11,12 COVID-19 vaccination is essential to control the spread of the virus and achieve herd immunity. Especially for adolescents, the vaccines help prevent asymptomatic infection and therefore play an important role in disease control in the community.13,14 However, vaccine hesitancy among university students is a concerning issue, as it may lead to prolonged community transmission and increased chances of infection. Some students may be skeptical about the safety, efficacy, and adverse effects of the vaccine, which may discourage them from getting vaccinated.5,15,16
The adverse effects of COVID-19 vaccines may vary depending on the type of vaccine administered. Some of the most common adverse effects associated with COVID-19 vaccines include soreness or redness at the injection site, fever, headaches, fatigue, and muscle pain.17–19 In rare cases, more serious adverse effects, such as myopericarditis and thrombotic events, may occur in adolescents and young adults but usually with a favorable prognosis.20,21 While studies show that the overall adverse effects among the global population are mild and self-limited,22 there is limited research specifically focused on type, intensity, onset, difference between each dose, and natural history of the adverse effects among university students.
This study aimed to investigate the characteristics of adverse effects that may arise from administering COVID-19 vaccines to university students in Thailand. The results will provide valuable information and guide strategies to implement mass COVID-19 vaccination among university students.
This study was conducted in accordance with the amended Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Ethics Committee of Thammasat University on August 3, 2021 (approval number 190/2564) and the Ethics Committee of Chulalongkorn University on September 27, 2021 (approval number 048/2021). Informed consent was obtained within the online questionnaire presented to participants at the onset of the study.
A cross-sectional survey was conducted among university students from two large public universities in the Bangkok metropolitan area, from 1st October 2021 to 31st January 2022. All participants were aged 18 years and were studying in 12 Health Science (HS) faculties (Medicine, Dentistry, Allied Health Sciences, Pharmaceutical Science, Cardiothoracic Technology, Chinese Medicine, Veterinary Science, Psychology, Nursing, Thai Traditional Medicine, Public Health, and Sport and Exercise Science), 5 Science faculties (Science, Engineering, Sirindhorn International Institute of Technology, Architecture, and Science and Technology) and 11 Social Science faculties (Communication Art, Law, Economics, Accounting, Liberal Arts, Political Science, Arts, Fine Art, Social Work, Social Science and Humanity, and Education). The students from Science and Social Science faculties were categorized as Non-Health Sciences (NHS) students.
An online self-administered questionnaire was created on Google Forms. An informative statement prefaced the anonymous online survey, and completing the survey affirmed consent. Comprehensive details about the study were provided, after which participants expressed their consent by selecting a checkbox. This step affirmed their understanding of the study’s details and their agreement to provide information for research purposes. This method of obtaining informed consent was reviewed and approved by the Human Research Ethics Committee (Medicine) of Thammasat University and the Research Ethics Review Committee for Research Involving Human Subjects of Chulalongkorn University. The questionnaire collected data including demographic data, educational data, types of vaccine, number of doses, and type, severity, and management of adverse effects. Response to all questions in the survey was mandatory to minimize missing data. Reliability was assessed using internal consistency among 20 students determined with Cronbach’s alpha of 0.77. Changes to the content of the questionnaire, mainly to improve understanding of the survey questions, were made according to the pilot testing among these 20 students. Confidentiality and privacy of data were maintained during the whole study process. During the COVID-19 pandemic, the study questionnaire was introduced to students by the student affairs departments of each faculty of both universities through their social media, such as LINE Application, Facebook, and Instagram. Snowball sampling was further used for distribution among university students.
In terms of the privacy of the respondents in this research survey, there is no recording of data that identifies the respondent. The information obtained from the survey was accessible only by the investigators of this study. This study was reported based on STROBE cross-sectional reporting guidelines.23
Based on the rates of AEs for the first dose of inactivated, VV and mRNA vaccines of 88%, 83%, and 83%, and for the second dose of inactivated, VV and mRNA vaccines of 72%, 99%, and 92%, with an acceptable margin of error of 10%, and the level of confidence of 95%, the minimum required sample size that received each dose and type of the vaccines are 41, 55, and 55 for the first dose and 78, 4, and 29 for the second dose. Statistical analyses were performed using the Software Package IBM SPSS Statistics Version 22.0 supplied by SPSS Inc (SPSS, Chicago, Illinois). Descriptive data were presented in number, median, and interquartile range (IQR). Categorical variables were analysed using the Chi-square test. Continuous variables were analysed using the Kruskal-Wallis test. P-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Characteristics | All (N=1440) | Health Sciences Faculties (N=524) | Sciences Faculties (N=392) | Social Sciences Faculties (N=524) | P* |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Gender | 0.02 | ||||
Female | 934 (64.9) | 335 (63.9) | 236 (60.2) | 363 (69.3) | |
Male | 506 (35.1) | 189 (36.1) | 156 (39.8) | 161 (30.7) | |
Age (years, median, IQR) | 20 (19-21) | 20 (19-22) | 20 (19-21) | 20 (19-21) | 0.01 |
Year of Study | <0.001 | ||||
Year 1 | 418 (29.0) | 157 (30.0) | 61 (15.6) | 200 (38.2) | |
Year 2 | 297 (20.6) | 81 (15.5) | 107 (27.3) | 109 (20.8) | |
Year 3 | 316 (21.9) | 113 (21.6) | 115 (29.3) | 88 (16.9) | |
Year 4 | 349 (24.2) | 129 (24.6) | 104 (26.5) | 116 (22.1) | |
Year 5 | 36 (2.5) | 25 (4.8) | 4 (1.0) | 7 (1.3) | |
Year 6 | 19 (1.3) | 18 (3.4) | 0 (0) | 1 (0.2) | |
Others† | 5 (0.3) | 1 (0.2) | 1 (0.3) | 3 (0.6) |
A total of 1728 university students participated in the study. Two hundred and eighty-eight participants were excluded because they received less than two doses of the vaccines. Of the remaining 1440 university students, 524 (36.4%) were from Health Science Faculties, 524 (36.4%) were from Social Science Faculties and 392 (27.2%) were from Science Faculties. The participants were predominately female (64.9%). Significantly higher proportions of students were from Social Science Faculties, were female, and were first-year students.
Characteristics | All (N = 1,440) | Inactivated (N = 700) | Viral vector (N = 669) | mRNA (N = 71) | P* |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
The number of students who have at least one adverse effect | 718 (49.9) | 269 (38.4) | 411 (61.6) | 38 (53.5) | <0.001 |
Adverse effects† | |||||
Muscle pain | 633 (43.96) | 221 (31.57) | 382 (57.10) | 30 (42.25) | <0.001 |
Fever | 426 (29.58) | 55 (7.86) | 359 (53.66) | 12 (16.90) | <0.001 |
Headache | 276 (19.17) | 51 (7.29) | 219 (32.73) | 6 (8.45) | <0.001 |
Injection site pain | 260 (18.06) | 67 (9.57) | 175 (26.16) | 18 (25.35) | <0.001 |
Cough | 28 (1.94) | 7 (1) | 20 (2.99) | 1 (1.41) | 0.03 |
Numbness | 94 (6.53) | 36 (5.14) | 57 (8.52) | 1 (1.41) | 0.008 |
Loss of appetite | 65 (4.51) | 11 (1.57) | 54 (8.07) | 0 (0) | <0.001 |
Faint | 57 (3.96) | 11 (1.57) | 46 (6.88) | 0 (0) | <0.001 |
Vomiting | 52 (3.61) | 9 (1.29) | 43 (6.43) | 0 (0) | <0.001 |
Diarrhoea | 42 (2.92) | 12 (1.71) | 30 (4.48) | 0 (0) | 0.003 |
Rashes | 23 (1.60) | 7 (1) | 16 (2.39) | 0 (0) | 0.07 |
Fatigue | 17 (1.18) | 9 (1.29) | 7 (1.05) | 1 (1.41) | 0.90 |
Others‡ | 22 (1.53) | 10 (1.43) | 11 (1.64) | 1 (1.41) | 0.95 |
Onset of adverse effects (post vaccination) | <0.001 | ||||
Within that day | 228/718 (31.75) | 73/269 (27.14) | 144/411 (35.04) | 11/38 (28.95) | |
1-2 Days | 407/718 (56.68) | 164/269 (60.97) | 220/411 (53.53) | 23/38 (60.53) | |
3-4 Days | 44/718 (6.13) | 16/269 (5.95) | 25/411 (6.08) | 3/38 (7.89) | |
More than 4 days | 39/718 (0.05) | 16/269 (5.95) | 22/411 (5.35) | 1/38 (2.63) |
Of the 1,440 students, 700 (48.6%) students received the inactivated vaccine, 669 (46.4%) students received the VV vaccine, and 71 (4.9%) students received the mRNA vaccine. 718 (49.9%) students reported having at least one adverse effect after receiving the vaccination. The students who received VV vaccines reported the highest rate (61.6%) of AEs. The most common AE of inactivated, VV, and mRNA vaccines was muscle pain (31.6%, 57.1%, and 42.3%, respectively). VV vaccine was reported to cause more muscle pain, fever, headaches, numbness, loss of appetite, fainting, vomiting, and diarrhea than the other two types. Both VV and mRNA vaccines were reported to cause more injection site pain than the inactivated vaccine. Most of the AEs occurred within the first two days (88.4%). A higher proportion of AEs were caused within 24 hours by the VV vaccine compared to the other two types.
Characteristics | All (N = 1,440) | Inactivated (N =573) | Viral vector (N = 756) | mRNA (N = 111) | P* |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
The number of students who have at least one adverse effect | 717 (49.8) | 225 (39.27) | 433 (57.28) | 59 (53.15) | <0.001 |
Adverse effects† | |||||
Muscle pain | 407 (28.26) | 133 (23.21) | 232 (30.69) | 42 (37.84) | <0.001 |
Cough | 205 (14.24) | 58 (10.12) | 141 (18.65) | 6 (5.4) | <0.001 |
Fever | 188 (13.06) | 33 (5.76) | 131 (17.33) | 24 (21.62) | <0.001 |
Injection site pain | 185 (12.85) | 55 (9.60) | 107 (14.15) | 23 (20.72) | 0.02 |
Fatigue | 143 (9.93) | 57 (9.95) | 73 (9.66) | 13 (11.71) | 0.79 |
Headache | 135 (9.38) | 30 (5.24) | 92 (12.17) | 13 (11.71) | <0.001 |
Numbness | 46 (3.19) | 19 (3.32) | 23 (3.04) | 4 (3.60) | 0.93 |
Loss of appetite | 33 (2.29) | 4 (0.70) | 21 (2.78) | 8 (7.21) | <0.001 |
Faint | 28 (1.94) | 7 (1.22) | 18 (2.38) | 3 (2.70) | 0.26 |
Vomiting | 22 (1.53) | 5 (0.87) | 13 (1.72) | 4 (3.60) | 0.08 |
Diarrhoea | 21 (1.46) | 7 (1.22) | 11 (1.46) | 3 (2.70) | 0.49 |
Rashes | 12 (0.83) | 4 (0.70) | 5 (0.66) | 3 (2.70) | 0.08 |
Onset of adverse effects (post vaccination) | <0.001 | ||||
Within that day | 101/717 (14.09) | 28/225 (12.44) | 65/433 (15.01) | 8/59 (13.56) | |
1-2 Days | 327/717 (45.61) | 114/225 (50.67) | 177/433 (40.88) | 36/59 (61.01) | |
3-4 Days | 27/717 (3.77) | 10/225 (4.44) | 11/433 (2.54) | 6/59 (10.17) | |
More than 4 days | 262/717 (36.54) | 73/225 (32.44) | 180/433 (41.57) | 9/59 (15.25) |
Of the 1,440 students, 573 (39.8%) students received the inactivated vaccine, 756 (52.5%) students received the VV vaccine, and 111 (7.7%) students received the mRNA vaccine. 717 (49.8%) students reported having at least one adverse effect after receiving the vaccination. Muscle pain was the most common AE of inactivated, VV, and mRNA vaccines (23.2%, 30.7%, and 37.8%, respectively). The mRNA vaccine was reported to cause more muscle pain, fever, injection site pain, and loss of appetite than the other two types, while the VV vaccine was reported to cause more cough than the other two vaccines. Most AEs occurred between 24-48 hours and after 4 days. A higher proportion of AEs were caused by the mRNA vaccine between 24-48 hours than by the other two types. A higher proportion of AEs were caused by the VV vaccine after 4 days.
Characteristics | All (N = 924) | Inactivated (N = 327) | Viral vector (N = 549) | mRNA (N = 48) | P* |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Management for adverse effects (any dose) | <0.001 | ||||
Spontaneously resolved | 578 (62.6) | 266 (81.3) | 276 (50.3) | 36 (75.0) | |
Symptomatic treatment | 330 (35.7) | 54 (16.5) | 264 (48.1) | 12 (25.0) | |
Hospitalization | 16 (1.7) | 7 (2.1) | 9 (1.6) | 0 (0) | |
Impact of adverse effects | <0.001 | ||||
1st dose more than 2nd dose | 607 (65.7) | 132 (40.4) | 452 (82.3) | 23 (47.9) | |
1st dose less than 2nd dose | 209 (22.6) | 113 (34.6) | 74 (13.5) | 22 (45.8) | |
1st dose equals 2nd dose | 108 (11.7) | 82 (25.1) | 23 (4.2) | 3 (6.3) |
Of the 924 students who received the same type of vaccine for the first and second doses, 327 (35.3%) students received the inactivated vaccine, 549 (59.4%) students received the VV vaccine, and 48 (5.2%) students received mRNA vaccine. Most of the AEs (62.6%) resolved spontaneously without further treatment. Compared to the other two types of vaccine, a higher proportion of the AEs of the VV vaccine required symptomatic treatment. Most of the participants reported that the adverse effects of the first dose were more severe than those of the second dose. The AEs of VV vaccine were likely to be more severe in the first than the second dose, while the AEs of the first and second doses of inactivated vaccine were likely to be equally severe.
Adverse effects originate from natural reactions to exogenous substances, such as vaccines. When these substances are detected by innate immune lineages, specifically neutrophils and macrophages, cytokines are released to trigger an immune response. This can result in systemic adverse effects, such as fever, muscle pain, headache, and nausea.24 The introduction of an inactivated COVID-19 vaccine in a population aged over 18 years has shown a significant induction of T-cell response secreting IFN-gamma.25 This mechanism may explain why young adults are more likely to experience vaccine-related systemic adverse effects than other age groups, as they have lower spike-specific IFN-gamma+CD4+ T cells, leading to more widespread T-cell activation and cytokine secretion.26 In our study, we found high rates of adverse reactions among university students (49.9% and 49.8% for the first and second doses, respectively). These results were consistent with high prevalence of adverse effects after COVID-19 vaccination among young adults reported from previous studies.27–31
Regarding the COVID-19 vaccines’ adverse effects, muscle pain, fever, and injection site pain were common among all three types of vaccines, which was similar to other studies.14,18,27–29,31–33 Injection site pain was common because of local responses induced by the injection and the high concentration of vaccine at the affected tissue.14,31 In contrast, muscle pain and fatigue are systemic reactions which commonly occur as a result of changes in pro-inflammatory cytokine levels in response to vaccine. These include a rise in interleukin-6 (IL-6) (causing fever) and increase in autoimmune activities that impair self-tolerance, disrupt the balance of muscle metabolism and cause cell damage and muscle pain.26,34
The frequency of each adverse effect varied based on the number of doses and the vaccine types. Overall, regardless of the dose, the group receiving the inactivated vaccines reported a lower prevalence of adverse effects compared to those receiving the VV and mRNA vaccines, which was similar to a report by Al Khames Aga et al.18 According to a review of COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness and adverse effects, inactivated vaccines elicit lower antibody responses compared to mRNA or viral vector vaccines because of their lower reactogenicity.35 The adverse effects of VV and mRNA vaccines can vary depending on the number of doses. In particular, VV vaccines had more adverse effects after the first dose compared to the second dose, while mRNA vaccines had more after the second dose compared to the first dose. These findings were consistent with those described in previous studies.19,30,36 Although the underlying mechanism of the different AE intensity between two doses is currently unknown, we hypothesize that it may be due to the body’s adaptation to the VV vaccine component leading to less adverse effect intensity in the second dose, while the increased immune response for the second dose of mRNA vaccine explains the more intense adverse effects in the second dose.
Some students experienced minor adverse effects like loss of appetite, vomiting, and diarrhea after receiving one of the three vaccine types, which were also reported in some studies.18,27,32 Rare adverse events like thrombosis and myocarditis have been reported following VV and mRNA COVID-19 vaccination,27,37,38 but were not reported in this study. Gastrointestinal symptoms and other minor effects were not frequently reported in this study compared to other studies.28,33,39 The VV vaccine was reported by some of our study participants to have caused coughing in addition to other common adverse effects. This was possibly due to an immune response to the vaccine that led to respiratory tract inflammation and triggered the cough reflex arc.40 For the mRNA vaccines, the prevalence of minor adverse effects, such as loss of appetite, vomiting, diarrhea and rashes was higher after the second dose compared to the first dose. This finding was consistent with the result from a previous study and might be explained by the increased immunogenicity and reactogenicity induced by the second dose.32
Most adverse effects from the first dose of the COVID-19 vaccines typically occurred within 48 hours. The onset of these side effects matched the reports of mRNA vaccines stating that systemic adverse effects are usually observed within the first or second day.31,36 However, our study showed that adverse effects from the second dose may be delayed and can occur up to 96 hours post vaccination. While some studies have compared the severity of effects after the first and second doses,18 few have discussed the management of adverse effects from COVID-19 vaccines. Our study found that symptomatic treatment was typically required for the adverse effects caused by the VV vaccine, which accounted for the highest proportion of such cases among the three major types of vaccines. This may be explained by the higher intensity of adverse effects experienced by students than with the other types of vaccines. However, overall adverse effects were non-severe, and only a small number of cases required hospital treatment. These findings are consistent with those reported in a previous study.27
There were recognizable limitations of this study. First, the single-center study may limit generalizability to other students in different settings. Second, because the survey was anonymous and self-administered, some questions may have been misunderstood. Third, the survey was conducted in a short period of time, and the respondents may have been affected by time limitations and by influences from recent social media and/or news. Lastly, there were inherent limitations, such as recall bias and confounding factors. Therefore, further research is necessary to determine the causal relationship between types and number of vaccine doses and adverse effects, especially among university students.
In conclusion, this study highlights the adverse effects that university students experienced after receiving the three major types of COVID-19 vaccines. Muscle pain, injection site pain, fever, headaches, and fatigue were commonly reported adverse effects while gastrointestinal symptoms and cough were reported less commonly. Overall, inactivated vaccines and the VV vaccine had the lowest and highest incidence of adverse effects, respectively. The majority of adverse effects occurred 24-48 hours after vaccination, were more severe with the first dose compared to the second dose, and resolved spontaneously without any treatment at a hospital. The study findings can be informative for university students and stakeholders in their institutions. Our findings can also help those involved in public health policies to improve vaccine acceptance and to improve management and monitoring of COVID-19 vaccines’ adverse effects among university students.
Open Science Framework: Adverse effects of COVID-19 vaccines in university students. https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/Y92BZ. 41
This project contains the following underlying data:
Open Science Framework: Adverse effects of COVID-19 vaccines in university students. https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/Y92BZ. 41
This project contains the following extended data:
Open Science Framework: STROBE checklist for ‘Adverse effects of COVID-19 vaccines in university students’. https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/Y92BZ. 41
Data are available under the terms of the Creative Commons Zero “No rights reserved” data waiver (CC0 1.0 Public domain dedication).
IBM SPSS Statistics Version 22.0 supplied by SPSS Inc (SPSS, Chicago, Illinois) is available from https://www.ibm.com/products/spss-statistics . An open-access alternative is RStudio available from https://posit.co/download/rstudio-desktop/.
We are grateful for the practical assistance from the Departments of Student Affairs from all faculties in the two universities for the distribution of the electronic research poster and the invitational messages for the online survey.
Views | Downloads | |
---|---|---|
F1000Research | - | - |
PubMed Central
Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.
|
- | - |
Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?
Yes
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?
Yes
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?
Yes
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?
Partly
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?
Yes
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?
Yes
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Reviewer Expertise: Infectious diseases
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Invited Reviewers | |
---|---|
1 | |
Version 1 23 Apr 24 |
read |
Provide sufficient details of any financial or non-financial competing interests to enable users to assess whether your comments might lead a reasonable person to question your impartiality. Consider the following examples, but note that this is not an exhaustive list:
Sign up for content alerts and receive a weekly or monthly email with all newly published articles
Already registered? Sign in
The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.
You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.
You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.
If your email address is registered with us, we will email you instructions to reset your password.
If you think you should have received this email but it has not arrived, please check your spam filters and/or contact for further assistance.
Comments on this article Comments (0)