Keywords
Community based services, qualitative research, barriers and facilitators to research
This article is included in the Health Services gateway.
Community-based NHS and social care services offer a wide range of health and social care services, including General Practice, care homes, hospices, community pharmacies, district and community nursing, and mental health services, which provide care from birth to the end of life. However, despite being fundamental to plans for health and critical social care, community-based NHS health services are poorly understood compared to hospital-based services. A scoping exercise failed to identify any specific research examining the barriers and facilitators of community-based NHS and social care services.
1) To develop a qualitative framework using semi-structured interviews to explore the perspectives and experiences of the research staff and practitioners. 2) To explore how we can build research on community-based NHS and Social Care services using the perspectives and experiences of the research participants. 3) To make recommendations to clinicians, practitioners, policymakers, and funding organizations on how to build research in community-based NHS and Social Care Services.
With reference to the literature and input from the project team and key stakeholders, interviews will be conducted using a semi-structured topic guide. The interview guide will identify barriers and facilitators to researching community-based NHS health and social services.
The intended outcomes of this study could help in understanding and developing strategies to address workforce needs to increase the capacity and capability of research delivery. Further, to embed a research culture in community-based NHS and social care services by supporting collaborative work between primary, secondary, community, and social care to build research capacity and capability; reach underserved communities and increase local engagement and participation in research; and increase equality, diversity, and inclusion by adding research in community-based NHS and social care services where everyone lives.
Community based services, qualitative research, barriers and facilitators to research
The vast majority of healthcare is delivered in the community rather than hospital settings, and they play an important role in planning the future of NHS health and care.1 The range of community-based healthcare is vast and includes general practices, care homes, hospices, community pharmacies, ambulance services, prisons, schools, opticians, district nursing, immediate care, and other community-based practices. Community health services, excluding GPs, have approximately 100 million patient contacts and account for approximately £10 billion of the total NHS funding every year, containing 20% of the NHS workforce.2
Community services can reach large, diverse, seldom-heard patient groups who are at different stages of their illness, and the NHS Long Term Plan aims to deliver more community-based services.3 It is important to note that the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) data revealed that UK communities that experience high disease rates also have the lowest number of patients participating in research.4 The areas where this was most evident were ethnic minorities and areas where deprivation is the highest. Community NHS Trusts and social care are the services most likely and appropriate to reach these underserved communities and embed research culture among these populations. However, despite being key to plans for health and critical social care, community services are poorly understood in comparison to hospital-based services,2 with limited community-based research.
Community healthcare providers are not viewed as obvious places for research compared with large teaching hospitals. Research may not be viewed as relevant to day-to-day community services in practice.5 However, little is known about the barriers and facilitators of community based NHS and social care services’ based research, and a scoping search had failed to identify any specific research projects on this topic.
In view of the above, there is a clear need to explore barriers and facilitators to engaging and delivering research in community-based NHS and social care services. By understanding these barriers and facilitators, recommendations can be made to address them. This will support the delivery of research in the community and increase research capacity and capability across local NHS trusts.
This study aims to understand how we can build research in community-based NHS and Social Care Services.
Objectives
To use semi-structured interviews and develop a qualitative framework to explore the perspectives and experiences of research staff and practitioners (with or without research experience) on barriers and facilitators of community-based research, and how we can build research in community-based NHS and Social Care services.
Outcomes
• Developing strategies to address the workforce needs to increase the capacity and capability of delivery of research.
• Support joint working between primary, secondary, community, and social care to build research capacity and capability.
• Strategies to embed a research culture in the community.
• Increase equality, diversity, and inclusion within research by adding research to the community in which everyone lives.
• Reach underserved communities and increase local engagement and participation in research.
Study design
Handle study is a qualitative study where members of research staff and other practitioners (with or without research experience) from community-based NHS and social care services will be invited to participate in a single semi-structured interview. The interviews will be conducted either face-to-face, via telephone, or using platforms such as MS Teams. The interviews will aim to explore the viewpoints and experiences of staff in engaging with research, which will help us understand the barriers and facilitators to building research in community-based NHS and social care services.
The sample
The sample will consist of research staff and practitioners with or without experience in research. People can be identified in several ways.
• Members of research staff or practitioners working in community-based NHS or social care services with or without research experience. These may include, but are not limited to, GPs and other practice staff (e.g., practice-based pharmacy), social care staff, occupational therapists, and physiotherapists employed by an organization providing community-based NHS and social services.
Based on similar research projects and the study team’s experiences, the predicted sample size is up to 25 staff members, including research staff and practitioners, or until data saturation is reached.
To recruit participants for this study, professional networks and social media will be used. Potential participants expressing interest will be asked to contact the Research Associate (RA) if they would like to participate in the study. The RA will share the study documents, including the Participant Information sheets and consent form, with them via email. Participants will be given the time to read the study documents and the opportunity to ask questions. An interview will then be organised either face-to-face or telephone/MS teams, as preferred by each participant. Informed consent will be obtained from each participant by the RA before the interviews. The participants will be given an opportunity to discuss any concerns with the RA before signing a written consent form and sharing it with the RA via email (if the interview is conducted virtually) or in person (if the interview is conducted face-to-face). The RA will countersign these forms prior to the interviews. Two copies of the consent forms will be completed: one to be retained by the research team and one for the participant.
A topic guide for interviews will be developed by the research team with reference to the literature, and input from the stakeholders and will change iteratively depending on ongoing data collection and analysis. The topic guide has been informed by results from a scoping review (conducted by the PI and Dr. Louise Warburton from the study team) looking at barriers to research in community-based NHS and social care services.
With the participants’ consent, the interviews will be audio-recorded and transcribed for analysis.
The interviews will be transcribed verbatim and anonymized. Qualitative framework analysis6,7 will be undertaken by the RA (GT) with support from other members of the research team. Framework analysis, which is well-suited for applied qualitative research and deductively moves from pre-specified aims and objectives, will be utilised to organize and understand the interviews by forming an analytical framework and then charting this data into a framework matrix.8,9
The initial analysis will be presented to and discussed with patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE) members and key stakeholders to gain additional perspectives. The findings from this qualitative study will inform recommendations made to clinicians, practitioners, policymakers (local and national), and funding organizations on how to build research in community-based NHS and social care services.
1. Two members of the public will be involved to inform the content of the interview topic guide, interpret the findings, and contribute to the development of key messages for dissemination from the qualitative interviews. One of the lead organizations Midlands Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust (MPFT) for the HANDLE study has an established PPIE group, the PPIE co-ordinator has been contacted by the RA to identify one member of the public to be involved as an advisor. The second advisor will be identified by linking with the lead for Birmingham’s Community Connexion (a PPIE program).
Upon completion of HANDLE, a Final Study Report will be written for the funders in the form of an academic publication. This paper will be available online in Open Access. The funding body will be acknowledged according to the standard NIHR criteria. Anonymised data will be made available upon formal request.
If participants desire, they can consent to being notified about the outcome of the study by providing their e-mail address on the consent form. E-mail addresses for this purpose will be stored for up to 2 years to allow time for the research to be completed. At this point, a lay summary report will be written and sent to consenting participants alongside the publication.
This research will be used to create recommendations to address the barriers and facilitators of conducting research in community-based NHS and social services. Findings and conclusions will also be shared at appropriate conferences (e.g., Health Services Research UK and Society for Academic Primary Care).
Approval committee: College of Health and Life Sciences, College Research Ethics Committee (CREC), Aston University.
Approval number: #HLS21115
Approval date: 1st August 2023
HANDLE involves human participants, and we will adhere to the Declaration of Helsinki at all times.
This study is led by Professor Ian Maidment. Members of the study team will meet fortnightly in Study Management Group meetings to oversee the study’s progress.
As data collection does not include the recruitment of NHS patients, ethical approval was sought from the College of Health and Life Sciences College Research Ethics Committee (CREC) at Aston University.
Any subsequent amendments to the study design and/or process will be submitted via CREC procedures. Routine reporting will take place in line with the Aston University CREC and
For any amendment to the study, the Chief Investigator in agreement with the sponsor will submit information to the appropriate body for them to issue approval for the amendment. Any amendments required for the study will be submitted to the College of Health and Life Sciences Research Ethics Committee, Aston University, for review.
The PI and RA will be responsible for the decision to amend the protocol.
If substantive changes are required, the funding body and R&D at each participating site will be notified in writing. Any amendments approved by the College of Health and Life Sciences Research Ethics Committee of Aston University will be added to an updated version of the research protocol.
HANDLE is a non-interventional study that is associated with a very low risk. There is a slight possibility that the interviews might cause distress to the participants; however, this is not an emotive subject. The study team recognises that sparing time to participate in interview/travel may cause minor discomfort. To minimise the discomfort the participants will be given a choice to take part in a remote meeting interview. Also, prior to the interview, the researcher will make it clear to the participants that there are no right, or wrong answers and they have the right to ‘not answer’ any question if they wish; pause/stop the interview or withdraw from the study altogether at any point during the interview. The RA has received appropriate training, as required, to conduct the interviews and ongoing support and supervision from the PI and other members of the team throughout the project will also be provided. The safety of the RA will be protected by adhering to Aston University’s Lone Working Guidance. The NIHR Safeguarding policy will always be followed.
Participants may feel that their participation will have an impact on their work lives. To address this issue, all participants will be fully briefed about the study procedures to maintain confidentiality before participating in the study. There is also the possibility that a participant may raise concerns or safeguard issues. If this occurs, the issue will be discussed with the person making the disclosure, and if appropriate, the RA will discuss the issue with the PI and report the matter to the relevant bodies. Ensuring the safety, well-being, and confidence of participants in the research is a prime concern.
The study will be conducted in accordance with the principles of Good Clinical Practice (GCP) in research studies and the UK Policy Framework for Health and Social Care Research. Aston University as the Sponsor, has a quality management system in place containing standard operating procedures that will be adhered to in the conduct of the study. Studies may be subject to an audit by Aston University as the Sponsor for quality assurance.
Any potential noncompliance event affecting the research will be promptly reported to the PI as soon as any member of the research team becomes aware of the event. The PI (or delegate), in discussion with the study management group/committee (SMG), will gather information to assess whether the event is a true noncompliance event with escalation and reporting, as outlined in the applicable HSCR standard operating procedure (SOP).
The SMG will monitor protocol compliance and recruitment during the conduct of this study, which will be discussed at fortnight meetings. Technical deviations from the protocol that do not result in harm to the study participants, do not compromise data integrity, or significantly affect the scientific value of the reported results of the study will be documented, and appropriate corrective and preventative actions will be taken by the research team with the PI responsible for these with agreement from the SMG.
A “serious breach” is defined as a breach of the protocol or of the conditions or principles of GCP, which is likely to significantly affect the safety or physical or mental integrity of the study subjects, or the scientific value of the research. In the event of doubt or for further information or guidance, the investigator should contact the PI. All protocol deviations and breaches of the GCP will be recorded and reported to the Sponsor and REC according to the applicable HSCR SOP.
Standard data protection procedures at Aston University will be employed to protect confidentiality and anonymity. The interviews will be audio-recorded with the permission of the participants. RA ensures that the audio files do not contain any personally identifiable information. To do so, the RA will ensure that the participants do not discuss personal information about themselves, their workplace, or any other identifying information after the recording has started. The participants will be made aware of this before starting the interview recording and will be reminded during the interview if a need arises. After the recording has started, the RA will ensure that the participants are not referred using their real name during the interview. The interview recordings will be securely transferred electronically to an Aston University-approved transcription service for transcribing.
After receiving the transcripts, the RA will go through each transcript to check for accuracy and again ensure that there were no names or other identifiable information recorded/included in the transcription. At this stage, each participant’s transcript will be replaced with a unique participant identifier, following the procedure described by Aston University. Only the PI and RA will have access to personal information and data. The agreement with the external transcription service covers confidentiality, data transfer, and destruction (files will be deleted once the transcription is completed). At all times, the transcriber will comply with the Data Protection Act of 1998. At the end of the study, database anonymization and locking will be performed in accordance with the SOPs.
Aston University has robust data security systems and procedures that are regularly reviewed, and it achieves the legal obligations set by the Data Protection Act (2018) and the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR),10 followed by the GMC Caldicott Guardian and British Computer Society standards and guidelines.11
Data collected from the interviews will be stored in Aston University’s secure Box, accessed by a password-protected laptop. The storage and access to the data will be in accordance with the SOPs. Data used for analysis will be kept separate from the consent forms containing participant-identifiable information. All confidentiality arrangements will adhere to relevant regulations and guidelines, and the PI has responsibility for ensuring the integrity of the data and that all confidentiality procedures are followed.
All investigators and study site staff must comply with the requirements of the Data Protection Act 2018 with regard to the collection, storage, processing, and disclosure of personal information and will uphold the Act’s core principles.
1) Personal addresses or email contacts will not be used to send invitation letters, PIS, or consent forms to potential participants.
2) Interviews conducted via MS Teams will be recorded on MS Teams. Telephone and face-to-face interviews will be recorded using an audio recording device. Data will be transcribed (with pseudonyms and identifying personal information removed). All participants will be aware of the audio recording and transcription processes via the PIS and the introduction to the interview. Transcription will be undertaken by an Aston University approved transcriber with a duty of confidentiality.
3) Data storage and analysis will be performed by the RA with support from the PI. Files will always be password-protected when emailed. Electronic data will not contain any identifiable personal information.
4) The study adheres to the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) 2018, which requires data to be anonymized as soon as it is practical to do so. Participants’ names will not be used instead of unique identifiers will be assigned (e.g., Participant 1).
5) The PI is the custodian of the data.
6) Data will be stored for 6 years in accordance with Aston University Policies.
Insurance and/or indemnity to meet the potential legal liability of the sponsor for harm to participants arising from the management of the research will be covered by the Aston University insurance.
Insurance and/or indemnity to meet the potential legal liability of the sponsor or employer for harm to participants arising from the design of the research will be covered by Aston University insurance.
No equipment will be provided to NHS sites for the purposes of this study.
Approval committee: College of Health and Life Sciences, College Research Ethics Committee (CREC), Aston University.
Approval number: #HLS21115
Approval date: 1st August 2023
HANDLE involves human participants, and we will adhere to the Declaration of Helsinki at all times.
Written informed consent will be obtained from each participant by the RA before the interviews. Consent to publish will be obtained from all participants and all efforts to anonymise the data will be followed.
Views | Downloads | |
---|---|---|
F1000Research | - | - |
PubMed Central
Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.
|
- | - |
Is the rationale for, and objectives of, the study clearly described?
Yes
Is the study design appropriate for the research question?
Yes
Are sufficient details of the methods provided to allow replication by others?
Partly
Are the datasets clearly presented in a useable and accessible format?
Not applicable
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Reviewer Expertise: operations research, health and systems modelling, statistical analysis, survey methods, qualitative research methods.
Is the rationale for, and objectives of, the study clearly described?
Yes
Is the study design appropriate for the research question?
Yes
Are sufficient details of the methods provided to allow replication by others?
No
Are the datasets clearly presented in a useable and accessible format?
Not applicable
References
1. Hamel N, Schrecker T: Unpacking capacity to utilize research: A tale of the Burkina Faso public health association.Soc Sci Med. 2011; 72 (1): 31-8 PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full TextCompeting Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Reviewer Expertise: Public health and community-based health and social services. Research designs, survey methods, qualitative methods, evaluation research.
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Invited Reviewers | ||
---|---|---|
1 | 2 | |
Version 1 29 Apr 24 |
read | read |
Provide sufficient details of any financial or non-financial competing interests to enable users to assess whether your comments might lead a reasonable person to question your impartiality. Consider the following examples, but note that this is not an exhaustive list:
Sign up for content alerts and receive a weekly or monthly email with all newly published articles
Already registered? Sign in
The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.
You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.
You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.
If your email address is registered with us, we will email you instructions to reset your password.
If you think you should have received this email but it has not arrived, please check your spam filters and/or contact for further assistance.
Comments on this article Comments (0)