Keywords
Adherence, COVID-19, pregnant mothers, Jinka Town, Ethiopia
Pregnancy-related coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) transmission and infection rates have continued to be a top public health concern. Pregnant mothers also have a higher risk of developing serious illness, needing to be admitted to an intensive care unit, and needing mechanical ventilation. More than six million people died as a result of COVID-19 worldwide. The aim of this study was to assess the level of adherence to COVID-19 preventive practice among pregnant mothers in Jinka Town.
In Jinka, South Omo Zone, between January 1 and January 30, 2023, a cross-sectional study was conducted. Using a simple random sampling technique, 412 pregnant women were selected. Data were collected using a face-to-face interviewer-administered, pre-tested questionnaire. The data were entered using Epi-data version 3.1, and after being exported, were analyzed using SPSS version 25. Bivariate and multivariable logistic regression analysis was carried out to identify relevant components. An adjusted odds ratio and a 95% confidence interval were used to report the relationship between the covariates and the outcome variable.
The percentage of participants who adhered to COVID-19 prevention measures was only 11.4% (95% CI: 8.5, 14.8). Mothers with at least a bachelor’s degree 3.71 (AOR=3.71, 95% CI=1.28, 10.73), a residency of 4.40 (AOR=4.40, 95% CI=1.96, 9.87), and a history of chronic illness of 4.30 (AOR=4.30, 95% CI=1.69, 10.93) were significantly associated with good adherence to COVID-19 prevention practices.
Only a very small percentage of pregnant women, according to this poll, adhere to COVID-19 preventative practices. In order to raise pregnant women’s awareness of COVID-19 preventive practices, it is crucial to use a variety of media for health education. Further, it is preferable to focus on urban living and give special attention to women without a formal education.
Adherence, COVID-19, pregnant mothers, Jinka Town, Ethiopia
A contagious illness called coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is brought on by the SARS-CoV-2 virus, which first appeared in Wuhan, China.1 On January 30, 2020, and March 11, 2020, respectively, the World Health Organization (WHO) proclaimed the 2019–2020 COVID–19 outbreaks to be Public Health Emergencies of International Concern (PHEIC) and pandemics, respectively.2,3 There are primarily two ways to spread COVID-19: directly and indirectly other bodily fluids and secretions, including feces, saliva, urine, semen, and tears, also contribute to the direct route of transmission. The term “aerosols” refers to particles produced during surgical and dental procedures as well as particles from respiratory droplets.4
By July 26, 2022, it had resulted in 568,773,510 confirmed cases of COVID-19 and 6,381,643 fatalities globally. On the African continent, similar figures of 9,192,139 confirmed cases and 173,946 fatalities were recorded. Ethiopia had 491,759 confirmed COVID-19 cases as of July 26, 2022, and 7,566 deaths had been reported. At the beginning of March 2021, it was reported that pregnant women infected with the virus had more than 73,600 illnesses, with 80 maternal deaths.5 As of the 6th of October, 2021, 1,637 infections caused by SARS-CoV-2 during pregnancy and 15 fatalities have been reported in Mississippi.6 Women are more likely than men to contract serious respiratory illnesses like SARS-CoV2 and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) during pregnancy due to immunologic and physiological changes connected to the condition.7,8
It recognized that some of the major causes of morbidity and mortality could be associated with health determinants linked to an individual’s health behaviour, such as the adoption of health behaviour against virus transmission (e.g., hand washing and wearing a mask outside) and the avoidance of health-harming behaviours (e.g., touching the face and assembling for events).9 Evidence suggests that COVID-19-infected pregnant women experienced unfavorable maternal and perinatal outcomes include preterm birth, low birth weight, severe sickness, hospitalization to an intensive care unit, mechanical ventilation, and death.10–12 A study found that during pregnancy, COVID-19 can be passed directly from the mother to the fetus.13 Additionally, studies have revealed that domestic violence, postpartum anxiety, and depression are more prevalent in pregnant women during pandemics.14 Although there have been no clinical trials for the COVID-19 vaccine that have included pregnant participants, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine encourage pregnant women to receive the COVID-19 vaccine if they desire to be immunized.15,16
Additionally, studies have shown that diets high in vitamins and fiber can boost immunity and protect COVID-19 infected women from adverse pregnancy outcomes.17,18 The Ethiopian government has also taken part in a variety of initiatives to prevent the virus from spreading throughout the nation, including community mobilization, raising public awareness, isolation, mandatory quarantine and treatment, strict passenger screening, house to house screening, and expanding diagnostic tests and treatment facilities.19
Although COVID-19 is becoming more widespread every day in Ethiopia, pregnant women cannot get the vaccine. Therefore, in order to reduce their risk of contracting the virus, pregnant women have to follow the prophylactic guidelines established by the Ministry of Health (MoH). This lowers morbidity and death among pregnant women and newborns.20 There aren’t many studies in Ethiopia that focus on the extremely vulnerable pregnant women, especially in the study area. The purpose of this study was to determine how well pregnant women in Jinka Town, South Omo Zone, Southern Ethiopia, adhered to COVID-19 preventative practices and associated factors.
The Wolaita Sodo University College of Health Science and Medicine’s Ethical Review Board granted ethical approval on December 10/2022.
Finally, a formal letter of permission from the Jinka town Health Office was obtained in order to move forward with the data collecting. Participation was only permitted after receiving informed written consent. To enable thorough and sincere self-disclosure, we kept voluntary engagement and confidentiality.
A cross-sectional study of pregnant women in Jinka, South Omo Zone, SNNPR, Ethiopia, was conducted in the community from January 1 to January 30, 2023. The administrative town of Jinka is located at 5°47′N 36°34′E/5.783°N 36.567°E latitude and longitude, 560 km from Hawassa and 750 km from Addis Abeba. The town acts as the South Omo Zone’s administrative hub in the Southern Nations, Nationalities and Peoples’ Region. In 2018, 30493 people were expected to live there, of whom 15,217 (49.9%) were males and 15,276 (50.1%) were women. The reproductive age group included 7,103 (23.3%) of the total females.21 There is one general hospital, two health centers, and six health posts in Jinka Town
All pregnant mothers who lived in Jinka town were the source population and all selected pregnant mothers in Jinka town was the study population. Pregnant mothers who lived for at least six months and more in Jinka town were eligible to be included in this study.
The sample size was determined by using a single population proportion formula by considering a proportion of good adherence 44.8%,20 level of confidence 95%, margin of error 5%. Thus, the sample size was
After considering a non-response rate of 10% the final sample size was 417.
Health extension workers work and give primary health care in the community by arranging and using family folder; all families in each kebele have their own family folder which contains a list of family members with the serial number, age, sex, marital status, educational status, under five, under one, pregnant mother, antenatal care (ANC) follow-up, non-communicable disease, HIV status and tuberculosis screening which is updated every year and helps as a source of information for each resident in each kebele. A simple random sampling technique was used to choose household from six kebeles in Jinka town utilizing an updated list from the kebeles administrative office. Then a basic random sampling approach created by a computer was used. According to the proportional to size allocation method, the likelihood that women were chosen depended on how many pregnant women were in the selected kebele. When more than one candidate was located in a household, a lottery procedure was used. When the interviewee was absent on the day of data collection, revisiting the interviewee helped to lower the frequency of nonresponses.
The dependent variable was adherence to the COVID-19 preventive practice, and the independent variables were the mother’s age, religion, educational level, occupation, marital status, husband’s educational level, occupation, number of families residing in the same place, average monthly income, gravidity, number of living children, having an ANC visit, number of ANC visits, pregnancy condition, history of prior bad pregnancy outcomes, history of chronic illness, and knowledge of the COVID-19
Adherence to COVID-19 preventive practice: Seven questions on recent practices were asked to participants and were based on a WHO recommendation for COVID-19 prevention methods.20 One point was awarded for a proper response, while zero was awarded for a mistaken one. If a participant obtained a score of above the mean or four or more on the usage of preventive measures, they were considered to have good adherence to COVID-19 preventative practice. If participants’ scores fell below the mean or less than four, they were considered to have insufficient adherence to COVID-19 preventative practice.20–23
By studying pertinent literature, the data gathering technique was created.23,24 Through a face-to-face interview during a home visit, data were gathered using semi-structured, pretested questions. The survey asks about socio-demographic traits, obstetric-associated variables, and knowledge of and preventive behavior related to COVID-19. For the purposes of data collection and monitoring, five BSc midwives and one MSc clinical midwife, respectively, were hired.
With the help of linguists, the questionnaire25 was written in English, translated into the Amharic-speaking region’s language, and then translated again into English to preserve the tool’s consistency. In order to assess the questionnaire’s response, language clarity, and appropriateness prior to the actual data collection, 5% of the total sample size was pretested in the Karat town district. The goal of the study, the components of the tool, and the data collection methodologies were covered in a one-day training session for the supervisor and data collectors. Additionally, they were made aware of the critical safety measures that needed to be done to avoid contracting COVID-19. Data collectors were observed for any issues during data collecting. The data collectors and supervisor verified the consistency and completeness of the data, and the incomplete data were noted.
The data were validated, coded, and entered in Epi data version 4.6 before being exported for analysis to SPSS version 25 (RRID:SCR_002865). Descriptive statistics, such as frequencies, percentages, means, and standard deviation, were computed. Bivariable logistic regression was used to establish the relationship between the independent and dependent variables. Then, variables with p-values less than 0.2 were included in the multivariable logistic regression analysis.
In the current study, a total of 412 women from the study were included in the analysis, yielding a response rate of 98.8%. Of the responders, 164 (30.9%) were between the ages of 18 and 24. The majority of study participants (66.4%) identified as Orthodox Christians. According to information about participants’ marital status, 94% of the study them were married. Almost a third (31.5%) of their husbands had attended secondary school, according to their husband’s educational background (Table 1).
The majority of the participants in the study, 370 (89.8%), were multigravida in their gravidity and more than half of the participants, 254 (61.7%), had planned pregnancies. A majority of the individuals, 362 (87.9%), had ANC follow-up (Table 2).
Almost all of the respondents (99.3%) in the study as a whole had heard of COVID-19. More than half of pregnant women said that a headache (61.7%) and runny nose (59.2%) are a symptom of COVID-19. From the total participants, 320 (77.7%) pregnant women were aware that pregnant women are more susceptible to COVID-19 than other groups (Figure 1).
The results of this study revealed that only 11.4% (95% CI: 8.5, 14.8) of the participants had good adherence to COVID-19 preventive practises (Figure 2).
Less than half (43%) of participants washed their hands with water and soap or with an alcohol-based sanitizer and only 9.7% of participants wore a face mask in public to reduce the spread of infection, respectively. From the total respondents, only 103 (25%) cover their mouth and nose during coughing and sneezing (Table 3).
In the examination of bi-variables, there was a significant relationship between mother’s educational status, communication media, residence, husband’s educational status, gravidity, history of prior bad pregnancy outcome, and history of chronic illness, with a p-value of less than 0.2. Multivariable logistic regression revealed that the mother’s educational level, communication media, residence, and history of chronic illness were statistically significant factors in adherence with COVID-19 preventative practice. Mothers with an educational status of college or higher were 3.71 (AOR=3.71, 95% CI=1.28, 10.73) times more likely to follow COVID-19 preventive practices than individuals whose educational status was limited to not being able to read or write. Another element that was strongly connected with strong adherence was communication media. Mothers who used communication media had a 4.33 (AOR=4.33, 95% CI=1.54, 12.15) times higher likelihood of adhering to COVID-19 preventative practices than those who did not. Mothers in rural regions were 4.40 (AOR=4.40, 95% CI=1.96, 9.87) times more likely to follow COVID-19 preventive practices than mothers in urban areas.
Another significant factor which was strongly associated with good adherence to COVID-19 preventative practices was history of chronic illness. Mothers with a chronic disease were 4.30 times more likely to follow COVID-19 preventative practices (AOR=4.30, 95% CI=1.69, 10.93) than mothers without a chronic illness (Table 4).
Variable | Good Adherence | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Good | Poor | COR | P-value | AOR | P-value | |
Mothers educational status | ||||||
Unable to read and write | 7 | 48 | 1 | 1 | ||
Able to read and write | 2 | 85 | 0.16 (0.032, 0.89) | 0.26 | 0.27 (0.049, 1.47) | 0.13 |
Primary education | 2 | 83 | 0.16 (0.03, 0.82) | 0.29 | 0.24 (0.04, 1.39) | 0.11 |
Secondary education | 7 | 96 | 0.50 (0.16, 1.50) | 0.21 | 0.53 (0’16. 1.79) | 0.31 |
Collage and above | 29 | 53 | 3.75 (1.50, 9.35) | 0.005 | 3.71 (1.28, 10.73)* | 0.015 |
Communication media | ||||||
Yes | 39 | 231 | 2.82 (1.28, 6.23) | 0.01 | 4.33 (1.54, 12.15)* | 0.005 |
No | 8 | 134 | 1 | 1 | ||
Mothers residence | ||||||
Urban | 22 | 294 | 1 | 1 | ||
Rural | 25 | 71 | 4.70 (2.50, 8.82) | 0.001 | 4.40, (1.96, 9.87)* | 0.001 |
Husband education | ||||||
Unable to read and write | 1 | 20 | 0.26 (0.03, 2.04) | 0.27 | 0.61 (0.06, 5.93) | 0.67 |
Able to read and write | 4 | 47 | 0.44 (0.14, 1.35) | 0.20 | 0.70 (0.17, 2.86) | 0.62 |
Primary education | 6 | 61 | 0.51 (0.19,1.32) | 0.15 | 0.69 (0.21, 2.23) | 0.54 |
Secondary education | 13 | 117 | 0.58 (0.28, 1.19) | 0.16 | 0.55 (0.23, 1.32) | 0.18 |
Collage and above | 23 | 120 | 1 | 1 | ||
Gravidity | ||||||
Primigravida | 13 | 143 | 1 | 1 | ||
Multigravida | 34 | 222 | 1.68 (0.86, 3.30) | 0.12. | 1.28 (0.54, 3.01) | 0.56 |
History of previous adverse pregnancy outcome | 0.59 | |||||
Yes | 17 | 66 | 2.56 (1.33, 4.92) | 0.005 | 1.28 (0.51, 3.23) | |
No | 30 | 299 | 1 | 1 | ||
History chronic illness | ||||||
Yes | 17 | 51 | 3.48 (1.79, 6.78) | 0.001 | 4.30 (1.69, 10.93)* | 0.002 |
No | 30 | 314 | 1 |
This study sought to determine whether pregnant women in Jinka Town, South Omo Zone, Southern Ethiopia, 2023, adhered to COVID-19 preventative practices and associated related factors in 2023. The current study showed that only 11.4% (95% CI: 8.5, 14.8) had good adherence with COVID-19 preventive practice. This finding is lower than studies conducted in Gurage zone 76.2%,22 in Northern Ghana 46.6%,26 in Nigeria 78%,27 Gondar city 44.8%,20 and a study conduct Debre Berhan Town 56.1%.28
The disparity in the study setting, the variation in the outcome variable used to measure the outcome, and the socio-demographic features of the study participants are all potential reasons of this discrepancy. Each of the aforementioned research was a cross-sectional institution-based study. Time differences could also be the reason for the discrepancy. The majority of the population is presently attempting to adjust to and cope with COVID-19.
The study also found that women with college degrees or higher were 3.71 times more likely than women who couldn’t read and write to follow COVID-19 preventive practices. The conclusion made in the current article was supported by studies conducted in Gondar,20 Debre Tabor, Ethiopia24 and Ghana.26 This may be due to the fact that educated people have easier access to knowledge about COVID-19 and its preventative strategy than those who are illiterate. Additionally, educated people might be better aware of the dangers of forgoing this preventive precaution as well as the preventive measures themselves.
The existence of mass media was another factor that was connected to good adherence. Participants with media access were 4.33 times more likely than those without to adhere well to COVID-19 preventive measures. The majority of the time in Ethiopia COVID-19 prevention strategies were promoted through the mass media. Pregnant women with communication media (mass media) might be more aware than those who have no communication media because they get information related to how to prevent COVID-19 through media.
Rural residents were more likely to practice COVID-19 preventative actions than urban dwellers. According to a study29 conducted in a low-resource African nation, rural populations were more likely to put COVID-19 prevention measures into practice. A study conducted in Guraghe Zone Hospitals22 indicated that urban residents were more likely than rural ones to practice COVID-19 preventive measures, which contrasted with the findings of the present study.
This may be because individuals in rural areas are more accustomed to hearing and applying government and health professional advice than people in urban areas, which enables them to take better COVID-19 prevention measures.
Another significant factor which was strongly associated with good adherence to COVID-19 preventative practices was history of chronic illness. Mothers with a chronic disease were 4.30 times more likely to follow COVID-19 preventative practices (AOR=4.30, 95% CI=1.69, 10.93) than mothers without a chronic illness. Because they feel they should, people with COVID-19 co-morbidities may be more cautious than people without co-morbidities.
According to this survey, only a very small percentage of pregnant women follow COVID-19 preventive practises. The mother’s level of education, her use of communication tools, her residency, and her history of chronic illness all had an impact on how well she followed COVID-19 preventive practise. As a result, it’s critical to improve pregnant women’s health education about COVID-19 preventive practises through a variety of media. Additionally, by emphasising urban residency and giving women without formal education special consideration.
Figshare: Questionar.docx. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.23796720. 25
Data are available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (CC-BY 4.0).
We would like to express our heartfelt thanks for Wolaita Sodo University, all individual for their contribution and cooperation.
Views | Downloads | |
---|---|---|
F1000Research | - | - |
PubMed Central
Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.
|
- | - |
Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?
Yes
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?
Yes
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?
Yes
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?
Yes
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?
Yes
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?
Yes
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Reviewer Expertise: Health services research
Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?
Partly
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?
Yes
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?
Partly
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?
Yes
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?
Yes
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?
Partly
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Reviewer Expertise: Pregnancy, Electronic Health Record, Retrospective Studies, COVID-19, Medication use
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Invited Reviewers | ||
---|---|---|
1 | 2 | |
Version 1 08 Jan 24 |
read | read |
Provide sufficient details of any financial or non-financial competing interests to enable users to assess whether your comments might lead a reasonable person to question your impartiality. Consider the following examples, but note that this is not an exhaustive list:
Sign up for content alerts and receive a weekly or monthly email with all newly published articles
Already registered? Sign in
The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.
You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.
You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.
If your email address is registered with us, we will email you instructions to reset your password.
If you think you should have received this email but it has not arrived, please check your spam filters and/or contact for further assistance.
Comments on this article Comments (0)