ALL Metrics
-
Views
-
Downloads
Get PDF
Get XML
Cite
Export
Track
Study Protocol

Exploring the impact of hydrotherapy interventions on stress reduction in construction workers: A scoping review protocol

[version 1; peer review: awaiting peer review]
PUBLISHED 01 Aug 2024
Author details Author details
OPEN PEER REVIEW
REVIEWER STATUS AWAITING PEER REVIEW

Abstract

Background

The global construction industry causes considerable stress to workers, affecting them physically and mentally. Stress, a reaction to difficult situations, can cause negative health effects. The demanding environment of a construction site increases stress, which leads to psychological, physical, and behavioral reactions. Traditional treatments often have side effects and social stigma. Hydrotherapy, which uses water for healing, offers a promising alternative that promotes relaxation and detoxification. Its multiple benefits make it a valuable stress management tool. This scoping review aims to critically analyze existing interventions on physiological well-being popular in the construction industry and to investigate the biological responses of hydrotherapy to stress markers. Finally, make recommendations that support the health of construction industry workers.

Methods

An evaluation funneled by the Arksey and O’Malley framework, improvements plus suggestions by Levac, Colquhoun and O’Brien, Daudt et al., with the 2015 Johanna Briggs Institute guidelines will be performed. Organized electronic explorations of records and search engines including Scopus, PubMed, CINAHL Complete, Google Scholar, plus IEEE Xplore will be conducted to retrieve distributed peer-reviewed articles from all research projects, excluding reviews and gray published works. All literature, research questions and sub-questions meeting the inclusion criteria will be integrated in this evaluation. All searched literature is transferred to the Endnote 21 library. The quality evaluation of the involved papers will be achieved by applying the MMAT 2018 version.

Discussion

We envision charting applicable sources on stress, researching the efficacy of treatment alternatives for stress as well as assessing their correlation with quality of life in construction workers. This study is expected to expose research gaps, which could guide future accomplishment research on stress treatment mediations.

Keywords

chronic stress, physical stress, workers, physiological biomarkers, interventions

Introduction

The global construction industry is characterized by high demands that affect workers both physically and psychologically, with significant stressors that extend beyond the physical demands of work.1 Stress is a typical physiological and psychological reaction triggered by the body in response to adverse, demanding or difficult situations, called stressors (Figure 1).2 Elevated stress is temporary and adaptive.3 In contrast, chronic stress is a long-term disease4 known to be associated with adverse reactions and negative effects on bodily processes.5 Constant or prolonged stress causes the body to release certain hormones or chemicals.6

50df5616-8ad9-4ef4-a25d-da04bc3aa45f_figure1.gif

Figure 1. The stress processes.

There are many systems in the body that independently regulate stress levels, involving the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis (HPA axis), the autonomic nervous system (ANS), and the immune system.7 The HPA axis responds to stressors by secreting cortisol, a substance that primes the body for fight-and-flight mechanisms plus a key biomarker of stress.8,9 As mentioned above, the ANS also plays a role in growth and regulation of weight gain and longevity. It controls the body’s functions through autonomic reflexes in response to external stimuli (environment, sight, smell, touch, etc.) and internal stimuli (maintaining of body homeostasis, such as temperature, blood sugar, water intake, weight, etc.).7 Therefore, emotional reactions such as anxiety or depression are psychological stress reactions associated with physical changes in the body such as backaches, headaches, poor eyesight, sleep problems, dizziness, fatigue and food cravings and indigestion.

Construction sites, being a dynamic and pressurized environment, present challenges such as tight schedules, compromised safety and complex tasks, compounded by long hours and demanding tasks. The relationship between work-related stressors and strain leads to a stimulus-response process where work stressors cause psychological, physical and behavioral responses.10,11 The most common treatment strategies include the use of prescribed anxiolytic medications and psychological interventions such as cognitive behavioral therapy.12 These medical procedures are known to have unwanted side effects such as drowsiness, nausea and in some cases the added challenge of dealing with social stigma.13

Hydrotherapy uses water, liquid, steam or ice for healing to improve circulation and quality of treatment.14 A bath or shower relaxes, relieves stress and helps remove toxins from the body.15 Hydrotherapy has been shown to be beneficial in the treatment of many ailments and diseases, making it a valuable treatment option in both traditional medicine and complementary approaches.16

This scoping review aims to methodically chart presented evidence from published works concerning stress, gather insight as to how stress affects the standard of life and commence to explore then advance understanding on efficacy of diverse treatments designed for stress on construction workers. The purpose of this research review is to systematically examine the existing evidence in the stress literature, gain an understanding of how stress affects quality of life, and start to explore then understand the efficacy of various stress medications for construction workers.

Global construction industry causes considerable stress to workers, affecting them physically and mentally. Stress, a reaction to difficult situations, can cause negative health effects. The demanding environment of a construction site increases stress, which leads to psychological, physical, and behavioral reactions. Traditional treatments often have side effects and social stigma. Hydrotherapy, which uses water for healing, offers a promising alternative that promotes relaxation and detoxification. Its multiple benefits make it a valuable stress management tool.

The insights from this study may be useful to construction workers as a supplement to their treatment armamentarium. This comprehensive review of the impact of hydrotherapy activities on stress reduction in construction workers can assist in the planning and delivery of safe and affordable stress interventions. Most medical interventions for stress have side effects and are not available to the poorest of the poor, increasing the burden on inaccessible populations. The insights from this study may benefit construction workers as a supplement to their medical supplies. We therefore help achieve SDG 3 by promoting the livelihoods of South African construction workers.

Methods

Protocol design

The purpose of this research protocol is to examine the presented evidence on current interventions for physiological well-being in the construction industry and to examine the biological responses of hydrotherapy to signs of stress. In addition, knowledge acquired from a review of this scope enables and builds a deep scientific understanding of stress management and can help improve the current armamentarium of stress treatments.

The research questions underlying this research review are:

  • Are there any studies that aim to reduce stress on construction workers?

  • What are the main components of these mediations?

Scoping assessment is done to answer the question. Led by the framework of Arksey and O’Malley,17 improved by Levac et al.18 and the 2015 guidelines of the Joanna Briggs Institute,19 the evidence for stress interventions is reviewed in the literature. According to this methodological framework, a systematic exploration involves a five-step framework as follows (Figure 2):

Step 1: Identify the research question

Step 2: Identify applicable findings

Step 3: Select studies

Step 4: Map the data

Step 5: data collection, summary and reporting

50df5616-8ad9-4ef4-a25d-da04bc3aa45f_figure2.gif

Figure 2. Text-based representation of the study design used.

To ensure that no step is missed, the process is guided by the Recommended Reporting Units for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis: Extension to Scoping Review Guidelines (PRISMA-ScR), (Figure 3). In addition, results are summarized and presented using the PRISMA-P 2015 checklist, which ensures a precise progression.20

50df5616-8ad9-4ef4-a25d-da04bc3aa45f_figure3.gif

Figure 3. Flow diagram for study selection in this scoping review.

Step 1: Identifying the research question

We seek to understand the therapeutic measures used to relieve stress in construction workers. The first research question will be “Are there any studies that aim to reduce stress on construction workers? “Followed by the second research question “What are the main components of these mediations?”

Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) provides information on literature search and registration strategies. The authors will refer to a health science librarian to filter the search protocol. From five electronic databases (PubMed, CINAHL, Google Scholar, and Scopus) search will be conducted for appropriate articles. The search terms include the PCC framework to determine the appropriateness of the research question. Determinants include construction worker stress management, reported stress management measures, reported effectiveness, bad/improved stress levels.

The purpose of this paper is to systematically search for treatments that workers use to relieve stress. And therefore, propose hydrotherapy as a possible treatment. The Population, Concept and Context (PCC) framework will be applied to assess the appropriateness of the research question as shown in Table 1. The review will include studies on stress management measures for workers in the construction industry. For exposure, all stress treatment studies will be considered.

Table 1. PCC framework for establishing the suitability of the investigation question.

CriteriaDeterminants
Population(1) Construction workers
ConceptStress management
Context(2) Reported Stress Treatment interventions
(3) Reported effectiveness
(4) Bad/improved stress levels?

Step 2: Identify applicable findings

Probing terminology will be used in a full electronic literature search that consists of the following databases: Scopus, PubMed, CINAHL Complete and Google Scholar. All articles distributed from the database from 2014 to 2024 will be considered. Search strategies will be established by the Principal Investigator (PI) in collaboration with the librarian. The search combination consists of keywords representing concepts of stress mediations. The search approach applying the Boolean terms “AND” and “OR” to separate search terms and terms from MeSH terms and keywords. Search outcomes with keywords, search outcomes and keywords, search string, Boolean terms, database then overall, of searched articles will be stored in the electronic database search storage table (Table 2). Reference lists of included articles will be hand searched to obtain additional literature.

Table 2. Outcomes from searched databases.

Date of searchElectronic DatabaseKeywords searchedQuantity of publications received
04/05/2024PubMed(“construct s”[All Fields] OR “constructed”[All Fields] OR “constructing”[All Fields] OR “construction”[All Fields] OR “constructions”[All Fields] OR “constructive”[All Fields] OR “constructively”[All Fields] OR “constructs”[All Fields] OR “dna, recombinant”[MeSH Terms] OR (“dna”[All Fields] AND “recombinant”[All Fields]) OR “recombinant dna”[All Fields] OR “construct”[All Fields]) AND (“occupational groups”[MeSH Terms] OR (“occupational”[All Fields] AND “groups”[All Fields]) OR “occupational groups”[All Fields] OR “worker”[All Fields] OR “workers”[All Fields] OR “worker s”[All Fields]) AND (“hydrotherapies”[All Fields] OR “hydrotherapy”[MeSH Terms] OR “hydrotherapy”[All Fields]) AND (“stress”[All Fields] OR “stressed”[All Fields] OR “stresses”[All Fields] OR “stressful”[All Fields] OR “stressfulness”[All Fields] OR “stressing”[All Fields])305

We administered a pilot search in PubMed to undertake the practicality of the anticipated research assessment (Table 2). The results of the pilot search are shown in Table 2. This research review is based on previous literature reviews such as Von der and Hagermoser,17,21 expanding understanding of this growing literature. Publication year restrictions (2014-2024) were applied to ensure that only current mediations were captured. To reduce selection bias, two researchers independently screened research titles and abstracts from the above databases. All valid records recovered from the database search will be transferred to the Endnote library. By means of Google Forms, two reviewers (primary and secondary authors) will simultaneously review all abstracts using inclusion criteria to determine suitability of selected and identified records. Google Forms will furthermore be tested so that all reviewers know how to run the tool. Both reviewers then perform a complete-text review of all qualified records. Conflicts amongst the two reviewers will be solved by an exchange of views then by inviting a third assessor. The kappa statistic will be used to determine the agreement between two raters.22 Kappa statistic >0.21 will be reflected adequate, whereas >0.61 will be reflected satisfactory, and 0.81-0.99 will be reflected realistically accurate.

Inclusion criteria

  • Articles in English

  • Articles investigating on treatment interventions used for stress

  • Original, peer-reviewed articles

2.2 Exclusion criteria

  • Non-scientific articles

  • Conference reports

  • Fewer than 10 study participants

  • Review articles

Step 3: Select studies

After searching for applicable articles, the key examiner will review the titles of each item. Qualifying items will be uploaded to the EndNote 21 library, where repeats will be detected then removed. Abstracts of included articles will be reviewed by two independent reviewers through an investigating instrument that defines inclusion also exclusion criteria. Neutral reviewers will review any differences occurring from the abstract screening phase until they reach agreement on the picked articles. Utilizing the screening tool, two reviewers will later review the full texts of applicable articles. A tertiary reviewer will solve any differences after reviewing the complete transcript. A librarian can help find articles that are not accessible. After that, the PRISMA-ScR flowchart23 will be applied to present the outcomes.

Step 4: Map the data

An electronic information mapping document will be used to collect applicable records for each picked article. Screeners independently complete the data table form electronically with any literature that has characteristics and key information applicable to the review question (Table 3).

Table 3. Data charting form.

Data charting heading
Author, Year
Study Title
Study Aim/Objective
Country
Study
Setting
Study Design
Study Population
Type of Concept Involved
Biological Responses
Application Technique
Results/Significant
Findings Reported

4.1 Quality appraisal

The methodological quality of the involved papers will be evaluated with the Mixed Method Assessment Instrument (MMAT) version 2018. The research plan of each article is assessed according to the MMAT guidelines. This helps to avoid the threat of inclination furthermore to warrant that all the records integrated in the research are relevant.24 Each study is evaluated in percentages and then a specific ranking is determined. Studies are classified as low quality if the score is 50% or less, medium if the score is between 51% and 75%, and high quality if it is between 76% and 100%.

Step 5: Collate, summarize and report outcomes

Thematic analysis will be used to pull out evidence to answer the research question. The rising themes from the data will narratively be summarized.

Discussion

This scoping review aims to critically analyze current physiological well-being interventions in the construction industry and to investigate the biological responses of hydrotherapy to stress markers. Finally, make recommendations that support the well-being of construction workers. Stress in construction workers can destructively influence their capacity to execute tasks, productivity, and capability to construct optimistic relationships correlated to their role.25 This is an important worldwide issue given the connection involving stress and subsequent depression among construction workers, as emphasized in a recent study.6,25 The mediating role of job stress in the relationship between job contentment and hiring and firing rate intention of construction workers is a critical area of research that affects both organizational management and individual well-being26 Job satisfaction is a multifaceted construct influenced by various work environment factors such as workload, relationships with colleagues and superiors, and opportunities for advancement3,27 When job satisfaction is low, it often leads to increased turnover, which can have a detrimental effect on organizational stability and productivity. Factors such as extreme workload,28 lack of control over one’s duties, and reduced interpersonal relationships29 can be as a results of high work stress. These stressors can weaken overall job satisfaction and encourage the desire to leave the organization.2 Understanding the mediating role of occupational stress allows organizations to take measures to reduce employee stress levels. By addressing the root causes of stress, such as managing workload and improving communication channels, organizations may be able to increase job satisfaction and reduce turnover among construction professionals. This not only benefits individuals by improving the quality of their work lives, but also contributes to the performance and stability of the company. Similarly, the impact of workplace interventions targeting psychosocial threats on security and health effects is particularly significant in sectors such as the construction industry where occupational hazards are common. Psychosocial risk factors include aspects of the work environment that affect psychological and physiological health and well-being, including job demands, decision-making freedom, social support, and organizational culture.30 Workplace measures that mitigate these hazards can improve the well-being of construction professionals.

Additionally, employing stress controlling programs, encouraging work-life balance initiatives, then improving communication and teamwork, water therapy stands out as a particularly effective tool for combating stress. Construction work often involves exposure to high temperature, that may results to heat stress, dehydration, and heat-related ill health such as heat stroke.2 Therefore, employers can implement strategies such as adequate rest breaks, shaded rest areas, hydration stations and personal protective equipment to mitigate the effects of heat stress. Additionally, educating workers about the importance of hydration, recognizing the signs of heat-related disorder, and implementing heat stress monitoring programs can protect the well-being of construction professionals.31

Lastly, a multifaceted approach which includes organizational interventions, policy changes, and individual-level strategies, including hydrotherapy addressing occupational stress, psychosocial risk factors, and heat stress among construction professionals is required. By prioritizing employee well-being and creating a supportive work environment, organizations can promote job satisfaction, safety, and health among construction workers, which ultimately leads to better organizational performance and employee retention.

Limitations

The study results will include only literature published within the past 10 years. It is possible that there are more seminal research studies not included in this review. The exclusion of non-English-language studies due to limitations in language proficiency may have limited our ability to include data from resource-constrained settings.

Declarations

The information produced and investigated from this study will be presented and published in a systematic scoping review article.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethical approval and consent were not required.

Consent for publication

Non relevant

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 1
VERSION 1 PUBLISHED 01 Aug 2024
Comment
Author details Author details
Competing interests
Grant information
Copyright
Download
 
Export To
metrics
Views Downloads
F1000Research - -
PubMed Central
Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.
- -
Citations
CITE
how to cite this article
Sihonqo B, Kuupiel D, Nxumalo CT et al. Exploring the impact of hydrotherapy interventions on stress reduction in construction workers: A scoping review protocol [version 1; peer review: awaiting peer review]. F1000Research 2024, 13:869 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.153848.1)
NOTE: If applicable, it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
track
receive updates on this article
Track an article to receive email alerts on any updates to this article.

Open Peer Review

Current Reviewer Status:
AWAITING PEER REVIEW
AWAITING PEER REVIEW
?
Key to Reviewer Statuses VIEW
ApprovedThe paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approvedFundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 1
VERSION 1 PUBLISHED 01 Aug 2024
Comment
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Approved - the paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations - A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approved - fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions
Sign In
If you've forgotten your password, please enter your email address below and we'll send you instructions on how to reset your password.

The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.

Email address not valid, please try again

You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.

You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.

Code not correct, please try again
Email us for further assistance.
Server error, please try again.