ALL Metrics
-
Views
-
Downloads
Get PDF
Get XML
Cite
Export
Track
Case Report

Case Report: Cystic artery peptic erosion: Uncommon cause of massive upper gastrointestinal bleeding.

[version 1; peer review: 1 approved]
PUBLISHED 02 Aug 2024
Author details Author details
OPEN PEER REVIEW
REVIEWER STATUS

Abstract

Introduction and importance

The cholecystoenteric fistula, a rare complication of cholelithiasis, usually occurs as an internal biliary fistula. Our case features a cholecystoduodenal fistula presenting with severe upper gastrointestinal bleeding originating from the cystic artery. Symptoms vary, and preoperative diagnosis is uncommon.

Case presentation

A 63-year-old diabetic patient, who had undergone surgical treatment for a left forearm fracture, presented with persistent bleeding, hematemesis, and melena. Diagnostic esophagogastroduodenoscopy revealed an actively bleeding ulcer on the duodenal bulb, with an attempted hemostasis. Initial stabilization was achieved, but a recurrence occurred after 17 hours with hemodynamic instability. Emergency laparotomy revealed cholecystitis with a cholecystoduodenal fistula, necessitating cholecystectomy and ulcer resection. The source of bleeding was the cystic artery. The patient had a positive postoperative outcome with no recurrence of hemorrhage.

Clinical discussion

Cholecystoenteric fistulas, forming from obstructed cystic duct inflammation, are rare complications of biliary lithiasis. Most cases are spontaneous, linked to gallstones. Severe upper gastrointestinal bleeding from cholecystoduodenal fistulas is uncommon, often requiring surgical intervention due to cystic artery erosion. Despite advancements in laparoscopic methods, open operations are preferred for anatomical distortion and inflammation. A clear diagnosis involves hepatic angiography and may necessitate embolization. The rarity of this condition emphasizes the need for vigilant diagnosis, especially in patients with gallstone history.

Conclusion

Massive bleeding from cystic artery erosion by duodenal ulcer through cholecystoduodenal fistula underscores the need for clinicians’ vigilance. Recognition of gallstone disease history is crucial for timely diagnosis in this rare cause of gastrointestinal bleeding.

Keywords

Cholecystoduodenal fistula, Gastrointestinal bleeding, Cystic artery, Gallstone disease, Peptic ulcer

Introduction

The cholecystoenteric fistula, an abnormal communication between the gallbladder and the gastrointestinal tract, represents a rare complication of cholelithiasis. The symptoms of cholecystoenteric fistula vary, and an accurate diagnosis before surgery is rarely established. It also rarely presents as upper gastrointestinal bleeding.

In this context, we present a rare case of cholecystoduodenal fistula that manifested as hypovolemic shock due to massive upper gastrointestinal bleeding, and the origin was identified as the cystic artery. Furthermore, this case reflects the necessary multidisciplinary approach to address the complexity of this condition. This work has been reported in line with the SCARE 2023 criteria.1

Case presentation

This is a case report of a 63-year-old diabetic patient on metformin (850 mg daily) with a history of a left forearm fracture that required surgical intervention, including postoperative intramedullary nailing. The patient received postoperative pain management with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (550 mg once daily) and a proton pump inhibitor (20mg once daily). He presented to our emergency department with hematemesis persisting for two days prior to admission, along with melena, and no fever. On examination, the patient was hemodynamically unstable with a blood pressure of 70/50 mmHg, a heart rate of 95 bpm, and was afebrile. Rectal examination revealed melena. Laboratory findings showed blood type A+, hemoglobin of 6.5 g/dL, and a prothrombin time of 80%. Renal function was within normal limits.

The patient was admitted to the intensive care unit with two peripheral intravenous lines, a urinary catheter, normal saline infusion, and a bolus of omeprazole (80 mg), followed by continuous infusion at a rate of 2 mg/hour. Additionally, he received a transfusion of 2 units of packed red blood cells. After stabilization of the hemodynamic status without the need for catecholamines, a diagnostic esophagogastroduodenoscopy was performed, revealing a large ulcer at the anterior wall of the first part of duodenum with active bleeding, classified as Forrest Ib (Figure 1). Adrenaline (1/1000 dilution) was injected for chemical hemostasis, and two clips were applied to achieve hemostasis.

147378b9-7d72-4f3c-a520-aa7b418fa5e5_figure1.gif

Figure 1. Oesophagogastroduodenoscopy image showing a large Forrest Ib ulcer at the anterior wall of the first part of duodenum.

The patient remained stable for 17 hours but subsequently experienced a recurrence of hematemesis and developed tachycardia and hypotension (blood pressure 80/50 mmHg) with a hemoglobin level of 6.1 g/dL.Catecholamines were initiated, and the patient was taken to the operating room for an exploratory laparotomy. A midline incision revealed features of cholecystitis, with the gallbladder neck adherent to the anterior aspect of the duodenal bulb (Figure 2).

147378b9-7d72-4f3c-a520-aa7b418fa5e5_figure2.gif

Figure 2. Per-operative view depicting adhesion between the inflamed gallbladder and the duodenal bulb.

The release of the gallbladder from the duodenal bulb revealed the presence of an approximately 1cm ulcer with a visible vessel (Figures 3, 4). Cholecystectomy was performed along with en bloc resection of the ulcer and gallbladder. The source of bleeding was identified as the cystic artery (Figure 5). The procedure concluded with pyloroplasty and truncal vagotomy.

147378b9-7d72-4f3c-a520-aa7b418fa5e5_figure3.gif

Figure 3. Cholecystoduodenal fistula with visualization of the clip placed during endoscopy.

147378b9-7d72-4f3c-a520-aa7b418fa5e5_figure4.gif

Figure 4. Excision of the duodenal ulcer that remains adherent to the gallbladder (yellow arrow), revealing the ulcer and the vessel responsible for the bleeding (white arrow).

147378b9-7d72-4f3c-a520-aa7b418fa5e5_figure5.gif

Figure 5. Resected specimen.

Catheterization of the cystic artery (yellow arrow) through a venous catheter across the ulcer (white arrow).

The evolution was favorable with no recurrence of hemorrhage, along with stabilization of hemodynamic status and hemoglobin levels. The patient was discharged on postoperative day 10. Postoperative follow-up was favorable with no recurrence of hemorrhage after 1 year of follow-up.

Discussion

We present an exceptionally rare case of gastrointestinal bleeding manifested as hematemesis, related to the erosion of the cystic artery caused by a cholecysto-duodenal fistula and an ulcer on the anterior aspect of the bulb. The study is limited by the patient’s postoperative demise, preventing subsequent follow-up.

Cholecystoenteric fistula is a rare complication of biliary lithiasis, with autopsy-reported incidences ranging from 0.1% to 0.5%, and an occurrence of 1.2% to 5% among cases undergoing cholecystectomy.2 This complication is more prevalent in women, typically around the age of 60,2 and the cholecystoduodenal type is the most frequently observed, followed by cholecystocolonic and cholecystogastric fistulas.3

Cholecystoenteric fistulas form when the obstructed cystic duct undergoes repetitive inflammation, leading to the adherence of the gallbladder to an adjacent organ.4,5 Approximately 91% to 94% of internally formed biliary fistulas occur spontaneously due to the presence of stones in the biliary tract, with gastric ulcers ranking as the second most common cause. Other potential causes include tumors, biliary abscesses, and echinococcus cysts.6 Most patients present with general features of gallstone disease, but less commonly, patients may also exhibit cholangitis, severe upper gastrointestinal bleeding, or gallstone ileus.

The cholecystoduodenal fistula is rarely associated with gastrointestinal bleeding. Invasion of the cystic artery by a duodenal ulcer can lead to massive bleeding, while a gallstone can cause erosion of the same artery.2 Severe gastrointestinal bleeding from a cholecystoduodenal fistula is uncommon, as reported by Park et al., who conducted a literature review and identified only 11 case reports.7 Gallstones were the primary cause, with gastric ulcers as the etiology in only two cases. Endoscopic findings varied, ranging from ulcers to fistulous openings and bleeding of unknown origin. Although endoscopic hemostasis was attempted in four cases, surgical intervention was necessary in all cases, consistent with our case report.

The rarity of this condition, despite the high incidence of cholecystitis, could be explained by the more frequent occurrence of cystic artery thrombosis due to nearby inflammation.8

Bleeding from the biliary tract typically occurs into the duodenum, leading to hematemesis and/or melena in patients.9 In cases of upper gastrointestinal bleeding with inconclusive endoscopy results, consideration should be given to a cholecystoduodenal fistula with a bleeding marginal ulcer.9 In a hemodynamically stable patient, a CT scan is required to establish the diagnosis.

Endoscopic ultrasound can detect clots in the cystic duct and the gallbladder lumen, indicating potential bleeding from the gallbladder. A definitive diagnosis is often achieved through selective hepatic angiography, which can reveal a pseudoaneurysm or active bleeding from a nondilated cystic artery. This diagnostic method is particularly valuable because it allows for subsequent selective embolization.10

Angioembolization serves as an alternative treatment in some centers for identifying and potentially stopping active bleeding from a fistula that cannot be managed with endoscopic hemostasis. If angioembolization is performed, it should be followed promptly by surgical intervention.11 This is essential as the clinical presentation of bleeding caused by gallstones might indicate a more complex gallbladder condition than initially suspected.12

Cholecystoduodenal fistula leading to severe upper gastrointestinal bleeding is exceedingly rare.9 Most case reports indicate that the bleeding source is typically the erosion of the cystic artery, either by a duodenal ulcer or gallstones. Managing bleeding cholecystoduodenal fistulas usually requires surgical resection of the fistula and repair of the duodenal perforation due to significant bleeding from the cystic artery, which is unlikely to be resolved by conservative methods. In our case, despite the use of diluted adrenaline injections and the placement of hemostatic clips, the patient continued to experience active bleeding.6

While laparoscopic methods are often employed due to advanced surgical techniques, open operations are preferred in cases involving anatomical distortion and severe inflammation.

Conclusion

We present a unique case of massive bleeding from the cystic artery eroded by a duodenal ulcer through a concurrent cholecystoduodenal fistula.

Given the rarity of cholecystoduodenal fistula as a cause of massive gastrointestinal bleeding, it is imperative for clinicians to be attentive to certain signs that can facilitate the differential diagnosis. A thorough consideration of medical history remains essential, as a history of gallstone disease can guide the diagnosis.

Ethical approval

Ethical approval for case reports is not necessary.

Consent

Written informed consent to publish this case and associated images was obtained from the patient.

Author contributions

Wassim dziri: Conceptualization, Writing – Original Draft Preparation

Med Dheker TOUATI: Writing – Original Draft Preparation

Nadhem khlifi: Writing – Original Draft Preparation

Rahma yousfi: Conceptualization, Writing – Original Draft Preparation

Sana Landolsi: Conceptualization, Writing – Review & Editing

Faouzi CHEBBI: Supervision, Writing – Review & Editing

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 1
VERSION 1 PUBLISHED 02 Aug 2024
Comment
Author details Author details
Competing interests
Grant information
Copyright
Download
 
Export To
metrics
Views Downloads
F1000Research - -
PubMed Central
Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.
- -
Citations
CITE
how to cite this article
Touati MD, Dziri W, Yousfi R et al. Case Report: Cystic artery peptic erosion: Uncommon cause of massive upper gastrointestinal bleeding. [version 1; peer review: 1 approved]. F1000Research 2024, 13:874 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.149688.1)
NOTE: If applicable, it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
track
receive updates on this article
Track an article to receive email alerts on any updates to this article.

Open Peer Review

Current Reviewer Status: ?
Key to Reviewer Statuses VIEW
ApprovedThe paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approvedFundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions
Version 1
VERSION 1
PUBLISHED 02 Aug 2024
Views
1
Cite
Reviewer Report 11 Sep 2024
Odeghe Emuobor, Medicine, Lagos University Teaching Hospital, Surulere, Lagos, Nigeria 
Approved
VIEWS 1
The paper describes a rare but important cause of upper gastrointestinal bleeding.

Please, the authors will do well to clarify the following:
1. The names of the NSAID and PPI given postoperatively; only the doses are ... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
Emuobor O. Reviewer Report For: Case Report: Cystic artery peptic erosion: Uncommon cause of massive upper gastrointestinal bleeding. [version 1; peer review: 1 approved]. F1000Research 2024, 13:874 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.164178.r315848)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 1
VERSION 1 PUBLISHED 02 Aug 2024
Comment
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Approved - the paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations - A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approved - fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions
Sign In
If you've forgotten your password, please enter your email address below and we'll send you instructions on how to reset your password.

The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.

Email address not valid, please try again

You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.

You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.

Code not correct, please try again
Email us for further assistance.
Server error, please try again.