Keywords
Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome, hypertension, magnetic resonance imaging, optic neuropathy, case report.
Optic neuropathy is very rare and exceptionally inaugural in systemic erythematous lupus erythematosus (SLE), and posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES) is a novel clinical disorder. What makes this observation unique is the combination of these two pathologies.
We hereby present the case of a severe presentation of PRES in a 15-year-old girl who was transferred to the intensive care unit for worsening hypertension and abdominal pain. The patient was first admitted to the adult medical department for sudden onset of binocular blindness. Therefore, antihypertensive drugs were prescribed and mechanical ventilation was required as she presented a refractory status epilepticus. A head computed tomography and MRI supported the diagnosis of PRES. The course was marked by a coherent awakening, progressive improvement in blood pressure and recovery of normal vision after 2 days. The patient was transferred to the nephrology department for renal biopsy. The diagnosis of SLE was based on four ACR criteria: positive ANA, positive anti-DNA, proteinuria greater than 0.5 g/l and lymphopenia.
In the presence of PRES, there should be no hesitation in requesting an immunological workup to look for a systemic disease. Despite a worrying clinical and radiological presentation, the prognosis of PRES remains favorable.
Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome, hypertension, magnetic resonance imaging, optic neuropathy, case report.
The diagnosis of systemic lupus erythematous (SLE) is essentially clinical and is generally based on the presence of four or more of the 11 revised criteria established by the ACR, present concurrently or sequentially, without limitation of observation time. None of the criteria included ocular involvement. However, ocular involvement is present in one-third of patients with SLE.1
Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES) was initially reported by Hinchey in 1996 and is described as a neurological disorder associated with several clinical conditions.2,3 Headaches, visual disturbances, altered mental status with focal neurological deficits, and/or epileptic seizures are the main clinical features of PRES. Typical transient lesions, particularly involving the posterior part of the brain, are the key neuroimaging findings in this condition. Visual perception disturbances in posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES) include hemianopia, visual neglect, and cerebral blindness, but not optic neuropathy.1
The reported rate of PRES in the pediatric population is 0.4%,4 but it appears to be more frequent in those with renal disorders.5,6 Neurological symptoms are related to vasogenic cerebral edema, the main pathophysiological mechanism underlying this condition.7 Urgent multidisciplinary management is imperative to improve patient outcomes.8
We report the case of a young patient with bilateral optic neuropathy optic neuropathy associated with PRES as the initial manifestation leading to the diagnosis of SLE.
A 15-year-old girl with no previous history was referred to the medical ward with a sudden onset of binocular blindness, generalized edema with hypertension, proteinuria, and hematuria. She was transferred to the intensive care unit after 2 days because of worsening hypertension (despite antihypertensive treatment) and abdominal pain.
Physical examination in the intensive care unit showed: T°=37°C, a normal state of consciousness (Glasgow coma scale score = 15), myosis, and light-reactive pupils, without fever or meningism. In addition, we found a high blood pressure of 180/110 mmHg and tachycardia of 126 beats per minute, with normal cardiac auscultation and pleuropulmonary examination results, edema of the face and soft white lower limbs, and diffuse abdominal tenderness.
Electrocardiography revealed sinus tachycardia without any other abnormalities. Labs: Proteinuria and three-cross hematuria. Fundus: Stage I bilateral papilledema. Laboratory findings: lymphopenia 1100/mm3, normocytic anaemia, 10 g/dL Hb; creatinine, 95 μmol/L, hypoalbuminemia 18.7 g/L, proteinuria 1.72 g/24H (>50 mg/kg/day). Thyroid and immunological tests were also performed.
Blood tests identified normal serum levels of creatinine (65.0 μmol/L; normal value ≤120 μmol/L) and urea (6.7 mmol/L; normal value ≤ 7 mmol/L) with a normal ionogram (natremia = 141 mmol/L, normal range between 135 and 145 mmol/L; kalemia = 4.1 mmol/L normal range between 3.5 and 5 mmol/L), a normochromic normocytic anemia (Haemoglobin = 9.4 g/dl, normal value ≥ 12 g/dl) and a low prothrombin time (60%; normal value 100%).
We completed with a head computed tomography (CT) scan (Figure 1) revealing vasogenic edema involving bilateral parieto-occipital regions, on cerebral MRI: bilateral and symmetrical parieto-occipital cortico-subcortical signal abnormalities, suggesting reversible posterior encephalopathy (Figure 2). Abdominal ultrasound revealed ascites and bilateral pleural effusion of a moderate size.
The medical history, clinical presentation, CT scan, and MRI findings supported the diagnosis of PRES. The rest of the work-up was performed later: thyroid work-up normal, NAA positive, and anti-DNA positive. The diagnosis of systematic lupus erythematosus (SLE) was based on four ACR criteria: positive ANA, positive anti-DNA, proteinuria greater than 0.5 g/l and lymphopenia.
PRES was accepted, and antihypertensive treatment. Furthermore, the patient presented, a refractory status epilepticus with persistent seizures despite appropriate use of two intravenous antiepileptic medications. Thus, she was intubated, mechanically ventilated, and received intravenous anesthetics drugs. Even though a continuous intravenous perfusion of nicardipine was prescribed as a treatment for hypertensive urgency, blood pressure levels remained high. Analgesia and antihypertensive drugs were discontinued within 48 h. The course was marked by progressive improvement in blood pressure, recovery of normal vision after a coherent awakening and no recurrence of seizures allowing successful weaning from mechanical ventilation. Then, the patient was transferred to a nephrology department, pending a renal biopsy.
Subsequently, she was discharged with oral hypertension treatment since the blood pressure values remained normal.
This case is very interesting, as it describes a severe PRES presentation with good outcomes owing to early multidisciplinary management. In addition, this syndrome revealed SLE in a child with no relevant medical history.
PRES, initially reported by Hinchey et al.,3 has gained increasing recognition owing to the improved availability of neuroimaging, which is central to diagnosis.2 As neuroimaging findings showed posterior leukoencephalopathy, it was first recognized as “posterior reversible leukoencephalopathy syndrome”.2 Later, the term PRES was adopted to design this entity because both white and gray matter are involved.9
Whereas the pediatric population seems to be more at risk for PRES, its incidence may be underestimated.10 The reported rate in the pediatric population is 0.4%4 and it increases between 4 and 9%, in those with renal disorders.5,6
Some conditions are especially associated with PRES, such as autoimmune diseases, hypertension, eclampsia, sepsis and shock.8,9 Besides, renal failure, hematologic diseases, and their therapies (particularly corticosteroids and cytostatic agents) are the most frequently reported cases in pediatric patients.10 Liu found ten occurrences of PRES in patients with SLE, all of whom were female,11 and the SLE activity disease index (SLEDAI) was almost third at the time of the onset of PRES.11
The main pathophysiological mechanism underlying PRES is vasogenic cerebral edema, which has two possible theories. The first one postulates that when severe hypertension exceeds the cerebral vessel autoregulation capacity, cerebral hyperperfusion and endothelial injury occur, resulting in vasogenic edema. The second theory hypothesizes that self-regulation mechanisms lead to excessive vasoconstriction, resulting in cerebral hypoperfusion and ischemia, followed by vasogenic edema.6,8
Furthermore, sympathetic innervations are less developed in the posterior cerebral areas than in the anterior ones, which explains the distinctive damage to the occipital and posterior parietal lobes, more vulnerable to rapid blood pressure variations.5,8
The clinical presentation is commonly associated with headaches, confusion, vomiting, seizures, and visual disturbances in up to half of the cases. While diffuse, dull headaches often progress gradually, they can sometimes be described as a sudden “thunderclap”,5 In 2022 Sudan et al. reported a 32-year-old SLE patient presenting with acute vision loss and other findings diagnostic of PRES.12
Seizures are observed in 74-84% of patients in the literature.10 They are usually generalized as tonic-clonic types and occur several hours or days after the first clinical signs.3,9 In fact, our patient initially a sudden onset of binocular blindness, generalized edema with hypertension, which were followed by refractory status epilepticus.
The diagnosis is based on the presence of a triggering condition, an hypertensive emergency, and specific neuroimaging findings.
PRES, which is both a clinical and radiologic entity, includes acute-onset headaches, vomiting, seizures, visual abnormalities, and parieto-occipital white matter changes on MRI.11
The radiological abnormalities of PRES are evident on CT scans as hypodense lesions revealing white matter edema distinctly involving the subcortical areas of the parieto-occipital lobes. CT also allowed us to rule out other alternative diagnoses. Although, it is less accurate than cerebral MRI, which is considered as the gold standard tool to confirm PRES. MRI should be performed as soon as PRES is suspected because T2 and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) sequences are sensitive to vasogenic edema. Hyperintense signals on T2 and FLAIR sequences and iso-or hypointense signals on T1 sequences are typical radiological findings in PRES.8 These signal changes were mainly detected in the bilateral occipital lobes, particularly in the white matter. However, gray matter involvement and symmetrical holohemispheric or unilateral lesions have also been described. Uncommon locations such as the cerebellar hemispheres, brainstem, basal nuclei, corpus callosum, and frontal lobes have also been reported.8,9 Therefore, atypical neuroimaging abnormalities in children may make the diagnosis of PRES more difficult than that in adults.
Even though, the biological findings with positive antibodies for SLE associated with the clinical presentation and the typical CT and MRI findings supported the diagnosis.
As blood pressure values remained high, requiring antihypertensive treatment after stabilization,10 hypertension may be longstanding but unrecognized until the day of admission.
The management of PRES is not specific, but immediate symptomatic treatment is imperative to improve the prognosis. It includes antihypertensive agents, antiepileptic treatment, avoidance of harmful agents, and control of the underlying comorbidities causing hypertension.9 For the patient of Sudan et al. she was treated with antihypertensives and switched from injectables to oral in the subsequent days, with complete resolution of her symptoms.12
The aim of treatment, in the acute phase, is not to achieve normal blood pressure levels, but rather to reduce progressively the mean arterial blood pressure by 20-25% over the first two hours.8 Then, cautious normalization of blood pressure must be performed within 24–48 hours.9 Intravenous agents with rapid action that can be easily adjusted and well-known clinical effects, such as nicardipine, clevidipine, and labetalol, are recommended.7
Besides, antiepileptic treatment is the same as in any other clinical condition associated with seizures.9 Thus, benzodiazepines, valproic acid, levetiracetam, and magnesium are effective therapeutic alternatives.8 Upper airway protection and the need for mechanical ventilation must be continuously assessed, especially in comatose patients and those with prolonged epileptic seizures, as well as in the case of our patient, who presented with refractory status epilepticus and required intubation.
An early diagnosis associated to a rapid, appropriate, and multidisciplinary management is imperative to improve patients outcome.2 In fact, the average time for symptom resolution in children is approximately 4.8 days (range: 1.5–14 days). A good prognosis is often the rule, as both the clinical and radiological features of PRES are reversible.7
A notable neuropsychiatric manifestation of systemic reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES) is the phenomenon of posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES). The diagnosis and treatment of PRES can be challenging because of its potential to manifest as an active lupus illness or a side effect of immunosuppressant therapy. This can obscure the specific role of SLE in the development of PRES. On the other hand, there is even less information available about SLE patients diagnosed with PRES.12
This case study is a reminder of the importance of detecting the early signs of hypertension before encephalopathy occurs. In fact, emergency physicians and pediatricians should be aware of the possible diagnosis of PRES in children presenting with visual disturbances, neurological signs, and hypertension, and must initiate early symptomatic treatment pending neuroradiological confirmation. An underlying condition must always be screened for, especially an autoimmune disease.
No data are associated with this article.
Extended data available
[Zenodo]. [binocular blindness in reversible posterior encephalopathy syndrome revealing lupus]. [https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13172707]. 13
This project contains the following extended data:
Data are available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (CC-BY 4.0).
Views | Downloads | |
---|---|---|
F1000Research | - | - |
PubMed Central
Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.
|
- | - |
Is the background of the case’s history and progression described in sufficient detail?
Yes
Are enough details provided of any physical examination and diagnostic tests, treatment given and outcomes?
Yes
Is sufficient discussion included of the importance of the findings and their relevance to future understanding of disease processes, diagnosis or treatment?
Yes
Is the case presented with sufficient detail to be useful for other practitioners?
Yes
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Reviewer Expertise: Clinical immunology
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Invited Reviewers | |
---|---|
1 | |
Version 1 21 Aug 24 |
read |
Provide sufficient details of any financial or non-financial competing interests to enable users to assess whether your comments might lead a reasonable person to question your impartiality. Consider the following examples, but note that this is not an exhaustive list:
Sign up for content alerts and receive a weekly or monthly email with all newly published articles
Already registered? Sign in
The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.
You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.
You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.
If your email address is registered with us, we will email you instructions to reset your password.
If you think you should have received this email but it has not arrived, please check your spam filters and/or contact for further assistance.
Comments on this article Comments (0)