ALL Metrics
-
Views
-
Downloads
Get PDF
Get XML
Cite
Export
Track
Clinical Practice Article

Case Report: A right-sided testicular artery of renal origin, in coexistence with a renal artery duplication: Dissection findings with clinical significance

[version 1; peer review: 2 approved with reservations]
* Equal contributors
PUBLISHED 23 Aug 2024
Author details Author details
OPEN PEER REVIEW
REVIEWER STATUS

This article is included in the HEAL1000 gateway.

Abstract

Purpose

The current cadaveric report describes the abnormal origin and course of testicular arteries (TAs) in two donated cadavers, along with a renal artery (RA) duplication.

Methods

Dissection of the inferior vena cava (IVC) and the abdominal aorta (AA) branching patterns were performed in 90-year-old- and 76-year-old formalin-embalmed donated male cadavers.

Results

Variants of the TA origin and course were identified, as coexisting with RA variants. Case 1: A right-sided RA (RRA) duplication (recorded as superior and inferior renal artery-SRA and IRA) with origin from the AA, coexisted with a right TA (RTA) that originated from the IRA and descended anteriorly to the ureter. The left TA (LTA) originated from the AA proximal to the origin of the left RA (LRA). The LTA coursed in front of the common drainage of the left testicular and renal vein into the IVC. Case 2: A bilateral RA duplication was identified and recorded as SRA and IRA. The right-sided SRA originated from the AA upper level and played the role of the accessory RA (ARA). The main perfusion of the right kidney was performed by the IRA which was further trifurcated into a superior polar, an inferior polar (IPA), and a TA. The RTA had a high origin from the IPA.

Conclusion

The current study reported two cases of TAs with abnormal origin and course accompanied by an RA duplication. A thorough knowledge of the origin and course of the TAs has clinical implications for the kidneys and testicle’ surgery.

Keywords

testicular artery, variation, renal artery, origin, duplication

Introduction

Typical and variant anatomy of the testicular arteries (TAs) or internal spermatic arteries should be carefully studied respectively to their laterality (side of appearance), because of their clinical role in testicular physiology and kidney and testicle surgery. Typically, the long and thin TA originates from the abdominal aorta (AA) anterolateral surface, at a distance of 2.5 to 5 cm distally to the renal artery (RA) origin, and above the inferior mesenteric artery origin.1 The TA supplies the perirenal fat, ureter, iliac lymph nodes, and the cremaster muscle.13 It is directed with the testicular vein (TV), retroperitoneal, on the psoas major muscle, enters the inguinal canal through the deep ring, and supplies the testicle.4 The right TA (RTA) originates anterior to the inferior vena cava (IVC) and lies posterior to the duodenum horizontal part, right colic and ileocolic arteries, root of the mesentery, and terminal ileum.1,2 The left TA (LTA) courses posterior to the inferior mesenteric vein, left colic artery, and descending colon.1,2 The right and left testicular veins (RTV and LTV) typically drain into the IVC, and the left renal vein (LRV), respectively.5

TA variants are not rare, as cadaveric studies have shown a prevalence ranging from 4.7% to 8.8%.5,6 The TAs may exhibit an arched course ranging from 1.7% to 20.3%.1 TA variants may be accompanied by TV alterations and the awareness of these venous anomalies may help surgeons accurately ligate abnormal venous anastomosis and avoid iatrogenic injury. TA variants may also coexist with RA alterations. Concerning the RAs, typically, a single RA emanates from the AA, on both sides.7 Frequent variants include the RA variant number7 among different ethnicities (4% in Malaysians, and 61.5% in Indians).8 The presence of multiple RAs is a well-documented phenomenon with a reported frequency of around 20%.7,8

The present cadaveric report explicitly describes the atypical origin and course of TAs along with an RA duplication and further discusses their clinical implications.

Cases report

During a routine dissection of the IVC and AA branching patterns in two formalin-embalmed donated male cadavers 90-year- and 76-year-old, several variants of the TAs origin and course were identified, as coexisting with RA variants. The cadavers were donated to the Anatomy and Surgical Anatomy Department of the Medical School of the Faculty of Health Sciences of the Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, and the Anatomy Department of the Medical School of the National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, after signed informed consent. The Ethics Committees of the two Universities gave full approval for the study. Case 1: A right-sided RA duplication (RRA) (recorded as superior and inferior renal artery-SRA and IRA) with origin from the AA, coexisted with an RTA that originated from the IRA, and descended anteriorly to the ureter. The LTA typically originated from the AA proximal to the left RA (LRA) origin. The LTA coursed in front of the common drainage of the LTV and LRV to the IVC (Figure 1). Case 2: A bilateral duplication of the RA was identified and recorded as SRA and IRA (Figures 2,3). The right-sided SRA originated from the AA upper level and played the role of the accessory RA (ARA). The main perfusion of the right kidney was performed by the IRA which was further trifurcated into a superior polar artery (SPA), an inferior polar artery (IPA), and a TA. The RTA had an origin from the IPA and descended anterior to the RRV (Figure 2).

f3173c8b-79d2-4e56-8d8f-cf83645449b1_figure1.gif

Figure 1. Right side-RA. Duplication of the renal artery (superior renal artery-SRA and inferior renal artery-IRA) and their origin from the abdominal aorta. The testicular artery (TA) originated from the IRA and descended anteriorly to the ureter (U). Left side-LB. TA originated from the abdominal aorta (AA) superior to the origin of the renal artery and coursed anteriorly to the common drainage point of the testicular vein (TV) and renal vein (RV) via a common stem with a suprarenal vein (SRV) into the inferior vena cava (IVC), U-ureter, and SRV–suprarenal vein. The LTA anterior course to the left renal vein mimics an unusual variety of nutcracker phenomena.

f3173c8b-79d2-4e56-8d8f-cf83645449b1_figure2.gif

Figure 2. RA, RB. The renal artery duplication (superior renal artery-SRA and inferior renal artery-IRA). The IRA trifurcation into a superior polar artery (1), an inferior polar artery (2), and a testicular artery (3-TA). The high origin of the testicular artery (3) from the inferior polar artery. The SRA originates from the upper level of the abdominal aorta (AA), AA-abdominal aorta, RK-right kidney, IVC-inferior vena cava, and RV-renal vein.

f3173c8b-79d2-4e56-8d8f-cf83645449b1_figure3.gif

Figure 3. LA, LB. Left-sided renal artery duplication (SRA-superior renal and IRA-inferior renal artery). The SRAdivision into a thick branch (1) and a thin branch (2). The similar distribution for the veins, SPV-superior polar vein, IPV-inferior polar vein, and the formation of the IPV from the 2’ and 3’ veins followed the same distribution with the arteries 2 and IRA. The 1’ had the same distribution as the arterial branch 1. LK-left kidney, U-ureter.

Discussion

The current study describes the TA’s abnormal origin and course in coexistence with an RA duplication.

Embryological development of the testicular and renal arteries (TAs and RAs)

Understanding the developmental stages of arteries provides the basis for understanding morphological variants.5 Regarding the embryological progression of the gonads, which are drained by the mesonephric arteries originating from the AA lateral surface 2,9,10 there are nine pairs14,6,11,12 which can be categorized into a cranial group which consists of the 1st and 2nd mesonephric arteries that mature into the celiac trunk, the middle group which consists of the 3rd, 4th, and 5th arteries that develop into the RAs, and a caudal group which consists of the 6th, 7th, 8th, and 9th mesonephric arteries which become the TAs.2 An extra artery in the middle group will typically evolve into the ARA.2,4 If a cranial mesonephric artery does not regress, it will lead to a high-origin TA.1,2,6,12

Regarding the 1st cadaveric report, we hypothesize an additional mesonephric artery in the middle group on the right side led to the RRA duplication. On the left side, there was a persistent cranial lateral mesonephric artery which would explain the LTA’s abnormal origin. The LTA arched course anteriorly to the LRV and the LTV common drainage could be due to the kidney’s position and the higher vertebral level of the LRV compared to the LTA’s origin.1,2,12 This anterior course mimics an unusual variety of nutcracker phenomena.13 The RTAs’ atypical origin of both cadavers can be explained by a possible bifurcation of an additional artery from the middle group of the mesonephric arteries.1,4 One branch would drain the genital ridge and the other would supply the kidney. The TA would come from the former of the two branches.

In the 2nd cadaver, an extra pair of mesonephric arteries in the middle group would explain the RA bilateral duplication.2,4 On the right side, there was not only one more mesonephric artery that evolved into the ARA but also the other mesonephric artery bifurcation would explain the IRA duplication. TA variants are more common in males than females,2,6,12 and the LTA variants (20.7%) are more common than the RTA variants (12.7%).9

Variants of the testicular arteries (TAs) origin (location and vessel)

The TAs typically originate from the AA anterolateral surface, just below the RA origin, at the 2nd or 3rd lumbar vertebrae level (L2 or L3).2,9 The most common variants include alterations in the level, source of origin, number, and course of arteries. TA’s origin can be more proximal than the RA and RV.14 TA’s abnormal origins include the right subcostal artery, the suprarenal artery, the celiac trunk, the right inferior epigastric artery, the superior mesenteric artery (SMA), the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA), the right common iliac, and right external iliac artery.13,9,15 TA may originate at the level of the SMA, level of the RA or above,9 in a common trunk with the IMA, and an ARA,15 or in a common trunk with the LTA and RTA from the AA.16 Atypical origins proximal to the L2/L3 level are classified as high-origins, and distal to the L2/L3 or the IMA level are considered low-origins.2,9 The highest origin for the TA was identified at the left side, from the thoracic aorta, proximal to the inferior phrenic artery,10 or above the aortic diaphragmatic hiatus (level of the 12th thoracic vertebra).4 An LTA was identified originating from the LRA in 5.26% and the RTA from the RRA in 2.63%.9 The TA may originate from the main RA, an ARA, or a polar RA.14,6,9,15,16 The most common TA variant origins were found in association with renal vessels. Regarding their number, double TA was the most common.1 Concerning the combined TA variants with RA alterations, in the current report, Naito et al.17 recorded the coexistence of multiple RAs (8 in total, arising from the AA) with a bilateral renal origin for the TAs, and Notokovich18 reported gonadal arteries of renal origin in 15%. The number of RAs can be up to six, the most common being 2RAs, similar to the current cadaveric cases. Multiple RAs are reported as the most common renal vascular variant by Satyapal et,19 with an average incidence of 28.2% (range 9-76%). Two or double RAs are reported to make up 89.5% of all multiple RAs.8 Merklin and Michels20 reported incidences for 2RAs, 3RAs, and 4RAs unilaterally of 20%, 2%, and 0%, respectively. Ozkan et al.21 and Sampaio and Passos22 reported an incidence of 0.2% and 0.4% for 4RAs, respectively.

Concerning the TA variant course, the most common variation was an arched course over the ipsilateral RV. Occurrence of the arched TA has been noted on both sides but with a predilection for the left side. An arched RTA had an occasional retrocaval course.1 Kayalvizhi et al.1 concluded an incidence ranging from 1.7% to 20.3% for the arched TA. The arched LTA course over the LRV, similar to the current two unilateral (left and right side) cases is particularly important as it can compress the LRV and impede the venous return from the left kidney and testis. Consequently, varicocele, orthostatic proteinuria, and hematuria can occur. All the observed variants in these two cases could be due to aberrations in the development of visceral vessels controlled by a common molecular regulator.23 Most of these variants are part of the age of the cadaver. Our findings reiterate the old dictum that if an anomaly is detected in one vessel, there are chances of encountering other related anomalies as well. Clinicians need to check for the presence of an arched TA when performing renal surgery, as any injury to this artery might cause testicular atrophy.24

Clinical aspects of testicular artery and coexisted variants

TAs variants although occur frequently, are accidentally discovered intraoperatively.9 The knowledge of the origin and the course of the TAs is clinically important for kidney and testicle surgery and can prevent intraoperative and postoperative complications.14,6,7,9,16 Surgeons should consider the RAs’ origin and path when they operate proximal to the renal pelvis or retroperitoneal and particularly target their usage in case of cryptorchism.1,4 The TAs’ abnormal origin and course around the kidney may lead to unexpected serious intraoperative hemorrhage.1,6,9 Radiologists should consider the possibility of variants when performing an angiography with indications, such as recognition of the arterial branches and planning the surgical procedure.16,9,15 If any abnormal origin or path of an artery is perceived via angiography, further examinations like magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and phlebography should be performed to reduce the possibilities of intraoperative and postoperative complications.1 Furthermore, knowledge of the numerous variants of the renal vessels is surgically important in cases of repair renal stenosis, renal infarctions, and renal hypertension, as well as other urological surgeries.1,9,12 Renal arterial hypertension may occur by RA compression and could progress to renal ischemia.1,4,15 The variations could also affect the perfusion and function of testicles.3,4,5 Knowledge of these variations can aid in the prevention of testicular atrophy.1,3,5 These variations could also have serious implications regarding the thermoregulation of the male reproductive tract and consequently have an impact on spermatogenesis.35 The lower frequency of the RTA variants compared to the LTA provides an advantage in the usage of the right kidney in transplantations.4 Kidneys with multiple vessels are in high demand for transplantation due to their ability to help more patients who require a transplant.4 Furthermore, a TA originating from the RA may disturb the testicles’ drainage when embolizing renal tumors.2,9,14,25 A case report recorded that during the embolization of a vessel in a renal tumor, an infarction occurred because of an abnormal TA origin from the RA, despite attempts to prevent it.25 Another similar case of testicular infraction has been reported which proceeded from an embolization of a renal angiolipoma.14 Because of the TA arched and anterior course with the RV, there is a potential for RV compression, as seen in the current case description, causing a varicocele secondary to vascular compression.1,2,15 RV compression could also cause venous hypertension, proteinuria, and orthostatic hematuria secondary to the tortuous vascular course.2,15 The TA’s abnormal course could compress the ureter and potentially lead to hydronephrosis.1,4,6

Conclusion

In the current cadaveric report, upon performing simultaneous dissections in different locations, similar variants were discovered in the TAs origin and course with RAs duplications in two cadavers. Surgeons should consider the origin and path of the TAs and the possible coexistence of the RAs alterations to prevent intraoperative and postoperative complications.

Consent

The cadavers were donated to the Department of Anatomy and Surgical Anatomy, School of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloneiki and the Anatomy Department of the Medical School of the National and Kapodistrian University of Athens through the Body Donation Program of the universities. The donor signed an informed consent before death giving consent to medical, education and research projects.

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 1
VERSION 1 PUBLISHED 23 Aug 2024
Comment
Author details Author details
Competing interests
Grant information
Copyright
Download
 
Export To
metrics
Views Downloads
F1000Research - -
PubMed Central
Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.
- -
Citations
CITE
how to cite this article
Konstantinos N, Vasilios E, Trifon T et al. Case Report: A right-sided testicular artery of renal origin, in coexistence with a renal artery duplication: Dissection findings with clinical significance [version 1; peer review: 2 approved with reservations]. F1000Research 2024, 13:953 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.150839.1)
NOTE: If applicable, it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
track
receive updates on this article
Track an article to receive email alerts on any updates to this article.

Open Peer Review

Current Reviewer Status: ?
Key to Reviewer Statuses VIEW
ApprovedThe paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approvedFundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions
Version 1
VERSION 1
PUBLISHED 23 Aug 2024
Views
11
Cite
Reviewer Report 29 Aug 2024
Savvas Lampridis, Imperial College London Faculty of Medicine (Ringgold ID: 4957), London, England, UK 
Approved with Reservations
VIEWS 11
Thank you for the opportunity to review this interesting manuscript on testicular artery variations coexisting with renal artery duplications. I appreciate the authors' efforts in documenting these anatomical findings.

The manuscript describes two cadaveric cases of abnormal ... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
Lampridis S. Reviewer Report For: Case Report: A right-sided testicular artery of renal origin, in coexistence with a renal artery duplication: Dissection findings with clinical significance [version 1; peer review: 2 approved with reservations]. F1000Research 2024, 13:953 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.165441.r316898)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
Views
7
Cite
Reviewer Report 28 Aug 2024
Eren Ogut, Istanbul Medeniyet University, Istanbul,, Turkey 
Approved with Reservations
VIEWS 7
Abstract: Abbreviations should be checked from MEDLINE. Case: Surgical background, history, underlying disorders should be added.Conclusion should be written in a more specific and contribution of these cases to the literature should be added and highlighted.Keywords should be written from ... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
Ogut E. Reviewer Report For: Case Report: A right-sided testicular artery of renal origin, in coexistence with a renal artery duplication: Dissection findings with clinical significance [version 1; peer review: 2 approved with reservations]. F1000Research 2024, 13:953 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.165441.r316903)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 1
VERSION 1 PUBLISHED 23 Aug 2024
Comment
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Approved - the paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations - A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approved - fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions
Sign In
If you've forgotten your password, please enter your email address below and we'll send you instructions on how to reset your password.

The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.

Email address not valid, please try again

You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.

You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.

Code not correct, please try again
Email us for further assistance.
Server error, please try again.