ALL Metrics
-
Views
-
Downloads
Get PDF
Get XML
Cite
Export
Track
Brief Report

Controlled carbon dioxide enrichment using beer fermentation off-gas results in 89% spinach yield increase

[version 1; peer review: 2 approved with reservations]
PUBLISHED 06 Jan 2025
Author details Author details
OPEN PEER REVIEW
REVIEWER STATUS

This article is included in the Agriculture, Food and Nutrition gateway.

Abstract

Carbon dioxide (CO2) enrichment is a strategy commonly employed by indoor/vertical farms to improve crop yields. Artificially elevating the CO2 concentration within an enclosed growth space results in improved photosynthetic efficiency, and therefore improved crop growth rates and flavor profiles. Alcohol fermentation provides a steady stream of CO2 that is typically emitted to the atmosphere as a by-product. To evaluate the feasibility of using fermentation off-gas as a source for indoor CO2 enrichment, spinach plants were randomly assigned to 2 growth chambers. The control chamber was maintained under ambient CO2 concentrations, while the treatment chamber was piped onto a flow control system capable of delivering CO2 from a beer fermentation vessel to the growth chamber to maintain CO2 levels at a setpoint of 1200 parts-per-million (ppm). CO2 flow was diverted to the growth chamber when levels were below 1200 ppm, and to an external exhaust when chamber levels were above 1200 ppm, with the flow control device measuring internal CO2 concentrations and responding accordingly every 6 seconds. Standardized batches of beer were used to replenish the fermentation source to maintain continuous fermentation and CO2 off-gas production. The CO2 flow control device successfully maintained a strong oscillation of CO2 around the 1200 ppm setpoint within the treatment growth chamber for the duration of the 50-day growth period. Spinach plants grown in the treatment chamber produced significantly more fresh biomass (5.456 g vs. 2.888 g), dry biomass (0.5711 g vs. 0.271 g), and significantly longer leaf lengths (231.0 mm vs. 159.9 mm) than their control chamber counterparts, respectively. This represents an 89% increase in fresh spinach crop yield within a controlled indoor growth environment.

Keywords

Vertical farming, CO2 enrichment, Circular economy, Photosynthesis, Carbon capture, Sustainable production

1. Introduction

Vertical and indoor farming has become an attractive alternative to traditional industrial agricultural practices as producers seek to maximize yields per unit of land area.1 Intense population increases in urban centers, the need for improved water-use efficiency, and the existence of a finite amount of arable land for agricultural use will continue to drive interest and investment in the indoor farming sector,24 and it is estimated that the global indoor farming industry will be valued at $91.1B by 2030.5 Many leafy-green and table vegetable crops benefit from growth in a controlled environment and do not require the footprint of common mass-produced cereal crops.6,7

While indoor agriculture thrives in many niche industries, transitioning a major portion of the current agricultural industry indoors will require innovation in all aspects of production. A common strategy implemented with indoor farming to improve yields is carbon dioxide (CO2) enrichment,8 whereby the local concentration of CO2 within the growth environment is artificially elevated. The elevated CO2 concentrations lead to improved photosynthetic efficiency, which has positive downstream impacts on both yield and flavor profile.9 CO2 enrichment, however, must be implemented for as long as possible to achieve full effectiveness, which can create a financial burden when using compressed CO2 or propane burners for enrichment considering the need for indoor air circulation and temperature control.10 Therefore, a strategy of implementing CO2 enrichment only during peak photosynthetic light-reaction output, rather than at all hours of the day, has been implemented to maximize the return on investment of CO2 enrichment for producers.11 This results in a loss of yield potential, as the carbon-capturing Calvin Cycle of C3 photosynthetic plants is active at all hours of the day and for a limited period in the dark.12 A more affordable source of CO2, however, is readily available.

The beer industry produces roughly 1.5 to 2.1 kg of CO2 per barrel of beer produced.13 In 2023, the United States alone brewed 165 million barrels of beer,14 resulting in the production of roughly 300 million kg of CO2 as a waste byproduct. Many large-scale breweries have implemented direct CO2 capture from industrial beer fermentation facilities for re-use in beer carbonation,15,16 although this requires a large capital expenditure that may not be readily available to all breweries and is an energy-intensive process, calling into question its actual impacts on industry sustainability.

The circular bioeconomy has been proposed as a means to help navigate the risks posed to global and local economies by a changing climate, where the value of bioproducts is stretched as far as possible to extract the highest possible gain with the lowest possible impact.17,18 As the agricultural industry continues to transition away from traditional practices and towards optimized practices that emphasize efficiency and sustainability, innovation in all aspects of production, from planting to packaging and delivery, will be required. To this end, this study evaluates the feasibility of the direct-use of alcohol fermentation CO2 off-gas for use in controlled indoor agriculture CO2 enrichment.

2. Methods

2.1 Spinach plant preparation and growth

30 Tyhee Hybrid spinach seeds (Spinacia oleracea, American Seed Company, Inc., Lot Number: SW1400432) were each planted in a pot (2 × 2 × 2 inch) containing 100 grams of Miracle-Gro Potting Mix soil (0.21 – 0.11 – 0.16) (miraclegro.com) and allowed to germinate on a heating pad, and the first 16 plants to show true leaf emergence were selected for use in the trial. Plants were randomly assigned to either the control or the treatment growth chamber, with each chamber housing 8 plants. Plants were allowed to acclimate to the growth chambers for 24 hours before fermentation off-gas was applied to the treatment chamber. Each growth chamber (Danby, 16-Watt LED Bloom Boss Lighting) was maintained with a 10-hour light/14-hour dark cycle to prevent bolting.19 All plants were regularly watered and fertilized with Miracle-Gro Water Soluble All Purpose Plant Food (miraclegro.com) according to manufacturer recommendations throughout the trial.

2.2 Fermentation substrate preparation and maintenance

Fermentation substrate (beer wort) was produced by the gallon batch every 4 days to replenish the fermentation vessel. A standardized “Czech Pilsner” recipe was used throughout the trial. 1 gallon of water was brought to a steady boil, at which point 1.2 pounds of Pilsen Light dry malt extract was added. After 30 minutes, 0.5 ounces of Citra hop pellets were added, and the wort was allowed to boil for another 30 minutes. After 1 hour of total boil time, the boil was terminated, and the wort was chilled. After chilling, the total volume was brought back up to 1 gallon with water and an 11.5-gram pack of US-05 dry ale yeast (Fermentis) was added. 12 hours after yeast inoculation, the fresh wort was used to replace the fully fermented wort in the fermentation vessel. This process of wort replacement occurred every 4th day throughout the trial.

2.3 Treatment-chamber CO2 enrichment

Low-pressure CO2 fermentation off-gas flow from the fermentation vessel (5-gallon glass carboy) was used to maintain CO2 levels within the treatment growth chamber at 1200 parts-per-million (ppm). A feedback-controlled flow control device consisting of a CO2 sensor wirelessly communicating with a 3-way solenoid valve piped into the growth chamber and fermentation vessel was constructed and programmed according to the schematic in Figure 1. Low-pressure CO2 flow produced by the fermenting substrate was directed to the treatment chamber when chamber levels were below 1200 ppm and directed to outdoor ventilation when chamber levels were above 1200 ppm, with sensor/valve communication occurring every 6 seconds. The control chamber was maintained under ambient conditions throughout the trial. Separate dataloggers within each growth chamber recorded CO2 levels for trending and comparison throughout the trial.

7a3ff2ae-38ac-4126-85f7-9514bb80d822_figure1.gif

Figure 1. Schematic representation of the control system designed to utilize beer fermentation CO2 off-gas to maintain CO2 levels within an enclosed growth chamber at 1200 ppm.

2.4 Data collection and analysis

After 50 days of growth, plant biomass was harvested and measured for analysis. A single plant from the control chamber was severely stunted, and therefore had a significantly negative impact on the control dataset, which artificially skewed the data analysis in favor of the treatment. This plant was, therefore, removed from the dataset, leaving the control chamber with 7 plants. Total plant biomass was harvested just above the soil, and total fresh weight was determined for each plant. Leaf length was then measured from tip of the leaf to the base of the stem. Because there was wide variation within each plant for leaf length based on time since emergence, only the longest primary leaf on each plant was used for length determination. After fresh weight and leaf length measurements were obtained, the biomass from each plant was placed in its own labeled paper bag, and all 16 paper bags were placed in a 65oC drying oven. After 24 hours of drying, dried biomass was removed and weighed, then returned to the bags and to the oven. After 30 hours, biomass weight was again measured and it was determined that because there was < 0.01% weight loss between hours 24 and 30 for each plant, the drying process was complete, and the 30-hour measurements were used for dry-weight determination. For subsequent data analysis (fresh weight, dry-weight, leaf length), all 8 plants for each chamber were treated as biological replicates and used to perform a two-sample t-test using GraphPad Prism 10 (graphpad.com, free alternative at tableau.com). Statistical significance was determined by a P-value < 0.05.

3. Results

3.1 Fermentation off-gas CO2 enrichment and control

CO2 enrichment was performed on a treatment growth chamber to compare spinach growth to a control growth chamber. To provide a constant flow of CO2 for enrichment, a beer fermentation vessel was piped into the treatment growth chamber with a wireless control device capable of directing low-pressure off-gas flow from the fermentation vessel to either the treatment growth chamber or to an outdoor exhaust via a 3-way solenoid valve ( Figure 1). The control system was programmed to maintain CO2 levels at 1200 ppm within the chamber. Throughout the trial, fermentation substrate (pilsner beer wort) was replenished within the fermentation vessel to ensure a constant state of active fermentation. The control system achieved a strong oscillation around 1200 ppm, with early, peak, and late-stage fermentation levels on a per-beer-batch basis evident on the control trend ( Figure 2A). As fermentation rates ramped up, the increased off-gas flow forced exaggerated spikes in CO2 levels within the treatment chamber, while during early and late-stage fermentation a much finer oscillation was maintained ( Figure 2B). To ensure that the chamber did not experience extended periods of drastically elevated CO2 concentrations, the control device was programmed to communicate a valve state-change every 6 seconds. Active CO2 enrichment at 1200 ppm was achieved for >95% of the growth trial.

7a3ff2ae-38ac-4126-85f7-9514bb80d822_figure2.gif

Figure 2. A. The control growth chamber was allowed to vent to ambient air, while the treatment growth chamber was CO2 enriched using off-gas flow from an active beer fermentation vessel. The control trends show CO2 values over the entire trial. Data points were logged using a datalogger independent from the flow control system every 5 minutes. B. A zoomed in view of an arbitrary 3-hour window during the trial to eliminate the noise associated with the large, compressed dataset.

3.2 Spinach growth

Spinach plants were harvested on day 50 of the growth trial. The 16 plants (8 from each chamber) were cut from the root base at the soil surface and weighed. The plants from the treatment growth chamber achieved a statistically significant 89% increase in above-ground fresh biomass ( Figure 3A). Due to the wide range of stem lengths on leaves within each plant due to the regular emergence of new leaves, only the longest primary leaf was used to determine leaf length. For the majority of plants, this was the first primary leaf to emerge, but this was not the case for every plant. After fresh weights were determined, the longest leaf from each plant was measured from stem base to leaf tip. The leaves from the treatment growth chamber achieved a statistically significant increase in length ( Figure 3B). Finally, after fresh weight and leaf length measurements were determined, the total above-soil biomass from each plant was placed in a drying oven to remove all moisture content. Plants were dried at 65oC and weighed, with dried above-ground biomass from the treatment chamber achieving a statistically significant increase over those from the control chamber ( Figure 3C). The dry weight comparison of the two chambers is a direct measurement of the increased carbon sequestration capacity in the treatment chamber and an indirect indication of improved photosynthetic efficiency. As all other treatments and conditions (watering, fertilizing, temperature, light intensity/exposure) were controlled for across both chambers, these increases in fresh weight, leaf length, and dry weight are directly attributable to the CO2 enrichment treatment.

7a3ff2ae-38ac-4126-85f7-9514bb80d822_figure3.gif

Figure 3. Fresh weight, dry weight, and longest-leaf length (A, B, and C, respectively).

Asterisks represent statistical significance at an alpha of 0.05, calculated with a two-sample t-test.

4. Discussion

The results of this study show that alcohol fermentation off-gas can be used for CO2 enrichment in an adjacently located indoor farm. CO2 enrichment is a common strategy implemented in indoor farming to improve crop photosynthetic efficiency and increase total yields. This occurs due to the increased carboxylation activity of the ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase (Rubisco) enzyme at elevated CO2 levels.2022 This enzyme is responsible for the initial fixation of CO2 to 3-phosphoglycerate, which then proceeds through the Calvin Cycle to ultimately produce glucose. This glucose can then be used to drive glycolysis or incorporated into cellulose or other biomass components.23 Under ambient conditions, the carboxylase activity of the Rubisco enzyme is in constant competition with it’s oxygenase activity, the latter of which ultimately leads to a net loss of energy.24 C3 crops, which include most of the common table vegetables associated with the modern diet, are particularly susceptible to this energy drain compared to their cereal crop C4 relatives.25,26

The CO2 off-gas flow controller used in this study was able to maintain a heavy oscillation around 1200 ppm throughout the entire growth trial. 1200 ppm was selected as the setpoint because it has previously been used with spinach.27 However, it will be important to further investigate a wide range of setpoints to further optimize growth potential. The CO2 setpoints will also require tailoring to specific crop species, as there has been reported a wide range of effects across different species.28 The controller was also designed to function in a binary “on/off” manner, in which CO2 flow was not finely controlled, but allowed to flow unrestricted until a valve state-change was called upon. This manner of control resulted in large oscillations and momentary swings in CO2 concentration within the treatment growth chamber. Although the treatment growth chamber clearly did not experience CO2 concentrations high enough to become overall detrimental to plant growth, a more-fine-tuned control system (proportional/integral/derivative, “PID”) may be capable of delivering improved results.

While the use of alcohol fermentation off-gas in this experiment for CO2 enrichment is novel, the results are not necessarily surprising. CO2 enrichment has been shown previously to increase photosynthetic rates in spinach leaf discs29 and to increase starch accumulation in above-ground spinach biomass.30 This proof-of-concept experiment has validated that the complex mixture of CO2, water vapor, and volatile organic compounds that make up a beer fermentation off-gas stream is capable of reproducing (and improving on) data produced using standard industrial and academic practices. From a plant science perspective, this study is useful in that it adds support to the scientific literature for studies showing improved photosynthetic efficiencies and growth under increased CO2 conditions across many different crop species.3133 However, from an agricultural perspective, this study is important because it presents a novel means to tap into a common waste stream for use in significantly increasing yields across a rapidly growing indoor farming industry while simultaneously mitigating the Scope 1 greenhouse gas emissions of the alcoholic beverage industry.

A large-scale transition to a circular bioeconomy will require innovative technologies that incentivize the switch. Waste stream re-use across many different industries will play an important role in this transition, and this proof-of-concept study presents a unique opportunity to improve indoor farming yields while cutting carbon emissions. An 89% increase in yield is a promising starting point for this technology that can still be further optimized and improved, but further work will be required for implementation across multiple crops with complex and undefined fermentation substrates.

Conclusion

These results show a beneficial impact on spinach yield of CO2 enrichment using a beer fermentation off-gas waste stream in an enclosed and controlled growth environment. Spinach plants were grown in a control growth chamber and a treatment growth chamber, in which CO2 levels were maintained at 1200 ppm by a control device utilizing free-flowing CO2 from a beer fermentation vessel. After 50 days, the spinach plants grown in the treatment chamber produced 89% more fresh above-ground biomass than those grown in the control chamber. This study validates the feasibility of using fermentation waste off-gas for indoor farm CO2 enrichment.

Ethics and consent

Ethical approval and consent were not required.

Data availability

Underlying data

Dryad. Controlled carbon dioxide enrichment using beer fermentation off-gas results in 89% spinach yield increase. https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.15dv41p6f.34

This project contains the following underlying data:

  • Raw_Data.csv

Data are available under the terms of the Creative Commons Zero “No rights reserved” data waiver (CC0 1.0 Public domain dedication).

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 1
VERSION 1 PUBLISHED 06 Jan 2025
Comment
Author details Author details
Competing interests
Grant information
Copyright
Download
 
Export To
metrics
Views Downloads
F1000Research - -
PubMed Central
Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.
- -
Citations
CITE
how to cite this article
Halter M. Controlled carbon dioxide enrichment using beer fermentation off-gas results in 89% spinach yield increase [version 1; peer review: 2 approved with reservations]. F1000Research 2025, 14:35 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.159587.1)
NOTE: If applicable, it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
track
receive updates on this article
Track an article to receive email alerts on any updates to this article.

Open Peer Review

Current Reviewer Status: ?
Key to Reviewer Statuses VIEW
ApprovedThe paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approvedFundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions
Version 1
VERSION 1
PUBLISHED 06 Jan 2025
Views
4
Cite
Reviewer Report 10 Mar 2025
Jorge Flores-Velazquez, Colegio de Postgraduados Campus Montecillos, Texcoco, Mexico 
Approved with Reservations
VIEWS 4
General Comments of manuscript Controlled carbon dioxide enrichment using beer
fermentation off-gas results in 89% spinach yield increase

First question; are the journal pretend published this work as a “brief report”????

This is ... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
Flores-Velazquez J. Reviewer Report For: Controlled carbon dioxide enrichment using beer fermentation off-gas results in 89% spinach yield increase [version 1; peer review: 2 approved with reservations]. F1000Research 2025, 14:35 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.175342.r367977)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
  • Author Response 13 Mar 2025
    Mathew Halter, TerraFerm AgTech, Inc., San Marcos, CA 92078, USA
    13 Mar 2025
    Author Response
    Thank you for your review.

    It seems like both reviewers so far are particularly interested in the CO2 detection device/flow controller. The device was custom designed and built using ... Continue reading
COMMENTS ON THIS REPORT
  • Author Response 13 Mar 2025
    Mathew Halter, TerraFerm AgTech, Inc., San Marcos, CA 92078, USA
    13 Mar 2025
    Author Response
    Thank you for your review.

    It seems like both reviewers so far are particularly interested in the CO2 detection device/flow controller. The device was custom designed and built using ... Continue reading
Views
6
Cite
Reviewer Report 05 Mar 2025
Cameron White, Commonwealth Scientific Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO), Kensington, Australia 
Approved with Reservations
VIEWS 6
The paper is an investigation into greenhouse CO2 enrichment utilising a simple on-off valve controlling CO2 flow into the greenhouse or to the exhaust. Figures are clearly presented and are easy to understand. Please see below for comments and requested ... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
White C. Reviewer Report For: Controlled carbon dioxide enrichment using beer fermentation off-gas results in 89% spinach yield increase [version 1; peer review: 2 approved with reservations]. F1000Research 2025, 14:35 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.175342.r367968)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
  • Author Response 06 Mar 2025
    Mathew Halter, TerraFerm AgTech, Inc., San Marcos, CA 92078, USA
    06 Mar 2025
    Author Response
    Thank you for your comments. 

    I feel compelled to say that the CO2 subscripts in the abstract were correct in the originally submitted manuscript. When the publication went live, and ... Continue reading
COMMENTS ON THIS REPORT
  • Author Response 06 Mar 2025
    Mathew Halter, TerraFerm AgTech, Inc., San Marcos, CA 92078, USA
    06 Mar 2025
    Author Response
    Thank you for your comments. 

    I feel compelled to say that the CO2 subscripts in the abstract were correct in the originally submitted manuscript. When the publication went live, and ... Continue reading

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 1
VERSION 1 PUBLISHED 06 Jan 2025
Comment
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Approved - the paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations - A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approved - fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions
Sign In
If you've forgotten your password, please enter your email address below and we'll send you instructions on how to reset your password.

The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.

Email address not valid, please try again

You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.

You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.

Code not correct, please try again
Email us for further assistance.
Server error, please try again.