ALL Metrics
-
Views
-
Downloads
Get PDF
Get XML
Cite
Export
Track
Study Protocol

Autoimmune Patient Health Through a Flourishing Framework: Protocol Scoping Review

[version 1; peer review: awaiting peer review]
PUBLISHED 04 Jul 2025
Author details Author details
OPEN PEER REVIEW
REVIEWER STATUS AWAITING PEER REVIEW

Abstract

Introduction

Autoimmune diseases often require long-term management and significantly affect patients’ physical and mental health. Conventional management strategies emphasize disease control and symptom relief, notwithstanding, the integration of positive health models such as the flourishing framework remains underexplored.

Objective

This protocol outlines a scoping review aimed to map and analyze how the flourishing framework has been applied in research and practice in autoimmune context.

Methods

Following the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodology for scoping reviews and the PRISMA-ScR guidelines, we will systematically search across multiple databases, including MEDLINE, Scopus, CINAHL, and PsycINFO. Studies will be screened using predetermined eligibility criteria. Data will be extracted and charted using a standardize form and will be analyzed narratively by presenting key characteristics and thematic trends.

Conclusion

The findings from this scoping review will provide a foundational insight into how flourishing is conceptualized, measured, and applied in the context of autoimmune disease. Thus, informing future research and integrative care models.

Keywords

Flourishing, Autoimmune, Autoimmune Patients, Mental Health, Scoping Review

Introduction

Autoimmune diseases affect over 50 million people in the United States, with more than 150 types of disease recognized.1 A population-based study conducted in Sardinia, Italy, found that rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus, and autoimmune thyroiditis were among the most common types. These diseases predominantly impact individuals in their productive age (>18 years), especially women, due to hormonal differences, including higher estrogen levels.2

Autoimmune disease also remains as major public health concern in Indonesia. The prevalence of type 1 diabetes –an autoimmune condition– in this country was reported at 41,000 cases in 2022,3 marking as the highest in Southeast Asia. Additionally, rheumatoid arthritis affects 7.3% of the population with 8.5% cases are women and 6.1% are men.4 The Center for Data and Information in Indonesia indicated that lupus cases in Indonesia increased by 2,166 in 2016, with the death rate increasing by 550 cases. This number is suspected to be even higher, as there is no national registry for Lupus patients.5

Autoimmune diseases are characterized by a malfunction of the immune system, resulting in the production of autoantibodies that attack healthy tissues and cause inflammation.6 Autoimmune diseases affect various organs and systems in the body, causing various susceptibility conditions, both physically and psychologically. Specifically, autoimmune disease associated with behavior and physiological problems, i.e., higher burnout and lower work engagement; cardiovascular risk and systolic blood pressure.7,8 Additionally, study on Lupus patients indicated that the diseases associated with reduced appetite, difficulty sleeping, frequent illness, and fatigue quickly when autoimmune symptoms appeared.9 There is a 20% risk of miscarriage in pregnant women with autoimmune diseases,10 and patients with comorbid depression have a 19% higher mortality rate and are characterized by less adherence to treatment.11 Previous studies indicated that psychological conditions were also compromised during the disease development: The patients’ perception, behavior, and overall wellbeing were affected, it even associated with psychosis12 or eating disorder,13 thus, promote negative emotions (i.e., worry and sadness14). A study among pregnant women with autoimmune showed an increase risk of schizophrenia in their offspring when blood inflammation occurs during pregnancy.15

The existing literature draws upon closely related concept such as wellbeing, happiness, and mental health. However, limited study specifically focusing on flourishing among autoimmune population. A study conducted by Kayes16 among 3,032 people with chronic diseases identified that only minor sample (n = 1%) were flourishing and languishing – the opposite of flourishing – is linked to higher susceptibility to chronic diseases. Previous studies on flourishing conducted commonly drawn within healthy population (see17,18). A study on flourishing in Indonesia was conducted by Irsyadiyah et al.19 on the effectivity of positive psychotherapy intervention using positive psychotherapy indicated that Lupus patients reported improvement on flourishing indicator after the intervention.

Given the limited empirical exploration of flourishing in the context of autoimmune, this scoping review aims to mapping the existing literature and identifying concept of flourishing as well as identify the research gaps that may beneficial to inform future empirical studies and interventions. Therefore, the objectives of this scoping review were threefold:

  • 1. To provide an overview of flourishing among autoimmune patients.

  • 2. To summarize and clarify terminology related to the impact of autoimmune diseases on patients.

  • 3. To identify knowledge gaps and suggest directions for future research.

Methods and analysis protocol

This scoping review protocol methods and analyses followed the five-stages framework developed by Arksey and O’Malley.20 This protocol of systematic review did not use informed consent because it’s not involving humans or animals including children. This research is part of a bigger project aimed at developing a framework of flourishing in the autoimmune context. Ethical clearance for this project was obtained from Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Psychology, Airlangga University, Indonesia number No.762/B/UN3.FPSI/III/TA.00.03/2025.

Stage 1: Identifying research questions (PCC)

The research questions were identified before conducting a scoping review of protocol elements according to the PCC structure. The aim of this study is to identify elements and factors of flourishing that influence the health of patients with autoimmune diseases.

Population

Autoimmune disease can affect any individuals in any age range. However, autoimmune diseases commonly affect individuals in productive age (i.e., 18-64 years; see 1). Therefore, the study population will be specified in this age group.

Concept

Autoimmune diseases can be exacerbated under excessive stress.21 Therefore, disease management of autoimmune disease involving the effort to maintain psychological stability. Flourishing is a potential strategy to achieve this goal of psychological stability. Flourishing defined as the relative attainment of a state in which all aspects of an individual’s life (both internal and external) are functioning well.22 In this study, flourishing is conceptualized as protective factors of chronic diseases management.23

Context

The search was focus on studies related to individual with autoimmune disease and having history of mental health symptom. This focus reflects the vulnerability of individual with autoimmune to excessive stress and its role on symptom exacerbation.21

Based on above mentioned rationale, this scoping review research questions are:

  • 1. What is the overview of flourishing in autoimmune individuals?

  • 2. What flourishing frameworks are typically found in the context of autoimmune?

  • 3. What knowledge gaps exist regarding flourishing models in individuals with autoimmune conditions?

Stage 2: Identify relevant studies

A systematic searching strategy of relevant studies will be developed in consultation with experts in this field and following the guidelines provided by librarians. The search for articles was conducted on seven databases: ProQuest, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, Taylor & Francis, EBSCO, Sage Journals, and SpringerLink. We aimed to broaden the search strategy to capture as many as studies as possible by including term (flourishing OR well#being OR Happiness) AND (autoimmune) as the keywords, as these terms are conceptually related and grounded in the similar theoretical frameworks. Manual search was also conducted by tracing citation networks and publication years using research mapping tools. Additionally, gray literatures were included to enrich the comprehensiveness of the review. To guide the screening of titles and abstract, inclusion and exclusion criteria were defined at this stage. Further, article duplication was also screened prior to final selection.

Stage 3: Study selection

Two independent reviewers will screen titles and abstract based on inclusion and exclusion criteria as it can see on the Table 1. Studies examining broadly on health without specifically mentioning flourishing will be excluded. Studies combining age categories will be included if involving participants age 18-64.

Table 1. Inclusion and exclusion criteria.

Inclusion criteria Exclusion criteria
The study involving autoimmune patients aged 18-64 yearsStudies investigating Quality of Life, Life Satisfaction, and General Health Well-Being
The study investigating flourishing, well-being, or happiness within positive psychology framework
Published or translated into English
Published from January 2018 onward

Stage 4: Data extraction

Data will be extracted from papers included in the scoping review by two independent reviewers using a modified JBI data extraction tool developed for this scoping review. The extracted data will include specific details about the population (e.g., age, diagnosis, type of autoimmune disease), methodology, models and concepts of flourishing, and key findings related to the object of review and inquiry. The draft of data extraction tool was modified and revised throughout the extraction process. Discrepancies between the reviewers will be resolved through discussion to achieve consensus or by a third-party review.

Stage 5: Reporting the results (manuscript)

The scoping review results will be reported through a narrative synthesis, flow diagrams (using PRISMA), and descriptive tables. These report will reflect and summarize the study characteristics, conceptual frameworks, identified gaps, and implication for research and practice in autoimmune care context.

Conclusion

This protocol provides a systematic approach to conduct a scoping review of flourishing framework among individual with autoimmune context within five stages. It outlines obvious inclusion criteria, a transparent methodology, and a rationale for the scoping review scope. The limitations include the specific age range being studied and involving studies reported or translated in English only, thus may limits the scope of the subject being studied.

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 1
VERSION 1 PUBLISHED 04 Jul 2025
Comment
Author details Author details
Competing interests
Grant information
Copyright
Download
 
Export To
metrics
Views Downloads
F1000Research - -
PubMed Central
Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.
- -
Citations
CITE
how to cite this article
Pasca Rina A, Surjaningrum ER and Kesuma Dewi T. Autoimmune Patient Health Through a Flourishing Framework: Protocol Scoping Review [version 1; peer review: awaiting peer review]. F1000Research 2025, 14:656 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.163729.1)
NOTE: If applicable, it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
track
receive updates on this article
Track an article to receive email alerts on any updates to this article.

Open Peer Review

Current Reviewer Status:
AWAITING PEER REVIEW
AWAITING PEER REVIEW
?
Key to Reviewer Statuses VIEW
ApprovedThe paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approvedFundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 1
VERSION 1 PUBLISHED 04 Jul 2025
Comment
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Approved - the paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations - A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approved - fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions
Sign In
If you've forgotten your password, please enter your email address below and we'll send you instructions on how to reset your password.

The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.

Email address not valid, please try again

You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.

You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.

Code not correct, please try again
Email us for further assistance.
Server error, please try again.