ALL Metrics
-
Views
-
Downloads
Get PDF
Get XML
Cite
Export
Track
Case Report

Case Report: Comparative Analysis of Surgical Treatments with Sleeve Gastrectomy in Recurrent Cascade Stomach

[version 1; peer review: 2 approved with reservations]
PUBLISHED 17 Jul 2025
Author details Author details
OPEN PEER REVIEW
REVIEWER STATUS

Abstract

Introduction

Cascade stomach (CS) or “cup and spill,” is an anatomical and functional deformity where the gastric fundus folds dorsally toward the corpus, creating biloculation. Surgical treatments for CS include gastropexy, sleeve gastrectomy, and Nissen fundoplication, however, standardized guidelines are lacking.

Case Presentation

A 58-year-old male presented to our hospital with a 20 years history of rapid feeling of full and abdominal discomfort after eating. He had undergone Roux-en-Y gastrojejunostomy in 2000, with a recurrence of symptoms shortly thereafter. Imaging revealed biloculation of the stomach with ventral flexion of the fundus, and endoscopy revealed the absence of the stomach ridge. A diagnosis of ventral gastric cascade was made, and the patient was successfully treated with proximal sleeve gastrectomy.

Methods

A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, ProQuest, Cochrane Library, EBSCOhost, and Google Scholar identified relevant studies. Articles were selected according to specific inclusion and exclusion criteria, resulting in the identification of five eligible studies.

Results

Sleeve gastrectomy demonstrated effective in alleviating symptoms by addressing biloculation and preventing axial rotation of the stomach. Comparative analyses revealed its advantages over gastropexy and gastrogastric anastomosis, offering long-term symptom resolution with minimal complications.

Clinical Discussion

Two studies highlighted the benefits of gastric sleeve resection in addressing non-functional gastric segments and preventing volvulus. Two other studies demonstrated that fundoplication could alleviate gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD)-related symptoms. These cases emphasize the importance of tailoring surgical techniques to individual patient needs and balancing symptom relief and complication risks.

Conclusion

Sleeve gastrectomy is a promising option for CS, offering symptom resolution in recurrent cases. Further comparative studies are essential to establish the optimal surgical approaches and long-term outcomes.

Keywords

cascade stomach, surgical treatment, sleeve gastrectomy, gastric sleeve resection, fundoplication, gastropexy

Introduction

The Cascade stomach (CS), also known as the “cup and spill” stomach, is a relatively rare anatomical-functional gastric deformity characterized by dorsal folding of the gastric fundus toward the corpus, resulting in the formation of two distinct chambers or biloculated stomach —an upper loculus formed by out-pouching of the fundus and a narrower lower loculus comprising parts of the corpus.1,2 CS may be congenital or acquired, with etiological factors including aerophagia, congenital deformities, peptic ulcers, upper gastric malignancies, perigastric adhesions, external compressions (e.g., from splenic flexure syndrome), or structural anomalies such as shortened diaphragmatic ligaments and altered gastric suspensory anatomy. The incidence of CS varies widely depending on the diagnostic modality and population studied, reported at 2.4% via radiological examination in Turkey, 2.5% and 58% via endoscopy in Turkey and Japan, respectively, and 13.6%–19.5% in barium studies in Bulgaria and Japan, respectively. Notably, a higher prevalence was observed among males.3 Despite being relatively uncommon, CS can cause significant symptoms, such as early satiety, postprandial discomfort, and reflux, particularly when it leads to impaired gastric emptying or abnormal motility.4

Medical management with proton pump inhibitors, prokinetics, or antispasmodics typically yields limited results, although some symptomatic relief has been reported with post-ure-related breathing exercises.4,5 Surgical intervention is often considered for refractory or recurrent cases, with several approaches described in the literature. These include laparoscopic gastropexy (to fix the flaccid fundus to the diaphragm after adhesiolysis), gastro-gastric anastomosis (creating a direct passage between the two chambers), sleeve gastrectomy (removing the non-functional upper loculus to prevent torsion), gastrojejunostomy, and Nissen fundoplication (esophagogastric fundoplasty) described in the literature.1

However, no standardized guidelines currently exist, and high-level evidence remains limited. Although the literature is sparse, isolated case reports and small series have documented successful surgical outcomes in patients with CS, suggesting the potential role of surgery in symptom resolution. We present the case of a 58-year-old male with a 20-year history of postprandial fullness who was previously treated with Roux-en-Y gastrojejunostomy. The symptoms recurred over time, including post-meal dyspnea and functional impairment. Physical examination results were unremarkable. Imaging and endoscopy confirmed a ventrally folded fundus consistent with the ventral gastric cascade. The patient underwent proximal sleeve gastrectomy, which resulted in complete symptom resolution and no recurrence at two-year follow-up.

This case highlights the role of surgery in symptomatic CS, and supports the need for clearer evidence-based guidance. This evidence-based case report aims to review and synthesize the highest quality data available on the surgical management of CS, to inform future clinical decision-making, and potentially contribute to the development of standardized treatment protocols.

Case report

We report the case of a 58-year-old Asian male worked as an official worker and presented to our hospital in July 2020 with a long-standing complaint of postprandial fullness. He reported early satiety and abdominal discomfort after consuming only a small amount of food, with symptoms that had persisted intermittently over the past 20 years. He denied associated nausea or vomiting, but noted increasing difficulty in breathing and performing daily activities after meals. He found temporary relief by lying down or straightening his body. There was no relevant family history of gastrointestinal diseases. The patient underwent Roux-en-Y gastrojejunostomy in 2000 because of similar complaints. Although this procedure initially alleviated the patient’s symptoms, it gradually recurred a few months postoperatively and progressively worsened over time.

No abnormalities were detected during physical examination. The Laboratory findings were within normal limits. A contrast study of the esophagus, stomach, and duodenum (Esophagus-Maag-Duodenum/OMG series) shown in Figure 1 revealed biloculation of the stomach between the fundus and corpus, with the fundus deviating ventrally. A barium contrast study demonstrated a fluid level in the fundus, and fluoroscopy confirmed ventral flexion of the gastric fundus. Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy revealed a pronounced fundal pouch upon entry into the stomach ( Figure 2a) and a marked ridge separating the fundus and the corpus ( Figure 2b). These findings support the diagnosis of the ventral gastric cascade.

8fe4b067-cfed-4ecc-b1d2-e8cf754b39de_figure1.gif

Figure 1. Oesophagus Maag Duodenum (OMG) radiology examination shown biloculation of the stomach.

8fe4b067-cfed-4ecc-b1d2-e8cf754b39de_figure2.gif

Figure 2. Endoscopic examination of the patient’s oesophagus and gaster.

In August 2020, the patient underwent a laparoscopic proximal sleeve gastrectomy. The folded fundus was resected using a linear stapling device, as shown in Figure 3a–c. The Postoperative recovery was uneventful, and the patient reported complete resolution of symptoms. The patient remained symptom-free during the two-year follow-up period with no evidence of recurrence. The patient remained symptom-free during the two-year follow-up period with no evidence of recurrence.

8fe4b067-cfed-4ecc-b1d2-e8cf754b39de_figure3.gif

Figure 3. Intraoperative proximal sleeve gastrectomy.

A 58-year-old male who came to our hospital in July 2020 and complained that his stomach felt rapidly full after eating only a few meals over the past 20 years. He had undergone Roux-en-Y gastrojejunostomy bypass surgery in 2000 because of this complaint. After this operation, the complaints subsided, but after a few months, they reappeared. Currently, patients complain that it is difficult to breathe and perform daily activities after meals. The patient had to straighten his body or lie down so that the symptoms receded slowly. Nausea vomiting was not observed.

The physical examination results were normal. In contrast, as shown in Figure 1, a study of the Esophagus Maag Duodenum (OMG) radiology examination of the stomach found biloculation of the stomach between the fundus and corpus. The fundus deviated ventrally, recognized by the barium contrast-forming fluid level in the fundus of the stomach. Fluoroscopy contrast examination confirmed that the gaster fundus was flexed toward the ventral side. Endoscopic examination revealed fundal pouch formation upon entering the stomach ( Figure 2a) and a pronounced ridge separating the fundus and the body of thestomach ( Figure 2b).

A diagnosis of ventral gastric cascade was established, and proximal sleeve gastrectomy was performed by resecting the folded fundus with stapling tools, as shown in Figure 3a-c. Postoperative complaints resolved uneventfully, and another contrast study was scheduled for evaluation. No recurrence was observed during the two-year postoperative follow-up period.

Clinical question

How effective is sleeve gastrectomy compared to other surgical options in improving gastrointestinal symptoms and outcomes in patients with cascade stomachs?

Methods

Literature searching strategy

This study was structured as an evidence-based case report adhering to SCARE criteria. A literature search was conducted on November 22 and 23, 2024, across seven journal databases: PubMed, Scopus, ProQuest, The Cochrane Library, EBSCOhost, and Google Scholar using keywords (“cascade stomach”) OR (“biloculation of the gastric cavity”) AND (“gastric sleeve resection”) OR (“sleeve gastrectomy”) AND (“Nissen fundoplication”) OR (“gastropexy”). The flowchart in Figure 4 illustrates the search strategy employed for each database.

8fe4b067-cfed-4ecc-b1d2-e8cf754b39de_figure4.gif

Figure 4. Flowchart diagram depicting the literature search process.

Selection criteria

The inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) systematic reviews and meta-analyses, randomized clinical trials (RCTs), cohort studies, case reports, or case series, (2) availability of full-text articles, and (3) studies written in English. On the other hand, the exclusion criteria included: (1) guideline articles or scientific consensus documents; (2) molecular studies, correspondence, editorials, or commentaries; and (3) lack of discussion on surgical outcomes in patients with cascade stomach. Due to limited recent data, studies published within the last 15 years were considered. Older studies were included if they were deemed clinically relevant and supported by subsequent evidence.

Critical appraisal

Relevant literature addressing the clinical questions was critically analyzed using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) checklist for case report studies provided by the Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Adelaide, South Australia. The level of evidence was evaluated in accordance with the 2011 Oxford CEBM guidelines. All the selected studies were validated and deemed appropriate for use as evidence in this case report. The outcomes of the critical analyses are summarized in Table 1.

Table 1. Critical appraisal of the articles.

NoAuthor, year1234567 8
1Schaffner et al.,5 1941YYYYYYYY
2Battisti et al.,7 1998YYNYYYYY
3Schouten et al.,6 2007YYYYYYYY
4Chhabra & Mongia,1 2016YYYYYYYY
5Bondar et al.,8 2023YYYYYYYY
6Jeo et al.,21 2025YYYYYYYY
Y yes; N not mentioned
Questions:

  • 1. Were patient’s demographic characteristics clearly described?

  • 2. Was the patient’s history clearly described and presented as a timeline?

  • 3. Was the current clinical condition of the patient on presentation clearly described?

  • 4. Were diagnostic tests or assessment methods and the results clearly described?

  • 5. Was the intervention(s) or treatment procedure(s) clearly described?

  • 6. Was the post-intervention clinical condition clearly described?

  • 7. Were adverse events (harms) or unanticipated events identified and described?

  • 8. Does the case report provide takeaway lessons?

Results

Five articles were selected and reviewed for this case report. The characteristics of each study are summarized in Table 2. Resection of the gastric sleeve was the first reported surgical procedure for treating a cascade stomach in a 35 years old described by Schaffner et al.5 in 1941. This procedure helps reduce the size of the loculus and prevents axial rotation of the stomach. Surgical correction, including fundus resection, provides significant symptom relief, demonstrating the condition’s complex etiology and the potential benefits of targeted surgical interventions.5

Table 2. Characteristics and summary of studies included.

No Author, yearSubjectsStudy designInterventionOutcome Level of evidence
Beneficial Adverse
1.Schaffner et al., 5 1941Male, 35 years oldCase reportOpen gastric sleeve resection

  • The patient was discharged after 16 postoperative days, he experienced immediate relief, and the dietary was slowly increased.

  • After correnpondence follow-up he had no return in symptoms and has gained a considerable amount of weight.

  • Open surgery requires a longer post-operative time

5
2.Battisti et al., 7 1998Male, 16 years oldCase reportLaparoscopic gastro-gastric anastomosis

  • Allowed the restoration of optimal gastric emptying.

  • At 3 months follow-up, the patient reported complete resolution of symptoms and 3 kg weight gain.

Not mentioned5
3.Schouten et al., 6 2007Female, 54 years oldCase report

  • 1. Laparoscopic gastropexy (Nissen fundoplication)

  • The patient remained symptom-free for 6 months following the initial laparoscopic gastropexy.

  • Symptoms of dyspepsia and gastrointestinal pseudo-obstruction recurred thereafter

5

  • 2. Laparoscopic gastric sleeve resection

  • The patient’s initial weight loss has reached a stable point.

  • Over a 24-month follow-up, the patient remained free from pain or gastrointestinal symptoms.

  • This procedure has not been previously reported in the literature as a treatment for CS

4.Chhabra & Mongia,1 2016Male, 57 years oldCase report

  • Laparoscopic Nissen’s fundoplication

  • 5-year follow-up showed complete resolution of symptoms and a weight gain of 3.5 kg

  • Indicating a positive long-term outcome.

Not mentioned5
5.Bondar et al., 8 2023Male, 55 years oldCase report

  • Gastropexy, gastro-jejunostomy and jejuno-jejunal anastomoses.

  • The surgery was done with a very good outcome, according to structural issues of the stomach, preventing future complications like volvulus.

  • Surgical treatment addresses gastric deformation and improves delayed gastric emptying (DGE).

  • Patient showed complete resolution of symptoms during a 6-month follow-up period.

Not mentioned5
6.Jeo et al.,21 2025Male, 58 years oldCase report

  • 1. Roux-en-Y gastrojejunos-tomy bypass

  • 2. Proximal sleeve gastrectomy

  • 1. The complaints subsided after the surgery, but after a few months, it is reappeared.

  • 2. Current procedure has shown good output, including:

    • Postoperative complaints were resolved.

    • No recurrence was observed during the two-year postoperative follow-up period.

Not mentioned5

Subsequently, Schouten et al.6 performed laparoscopic gastric sleeve resection for recurrent cascade stomach (CS) with satisfactory results. He described the case of a 54-year-old woman with CS who was successfully treated using a laparoscopic gastropexy approach in 1999; however, symptoms recurred after 4 years, necessitating gastropexy. Otherwise, a more aggressive surgical approach was adopted for the patient who later underwent laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy due to persistent symptoms. However, this technique has not been previously documented in literature as a treatment for this condition. Considerations for this new approach are based on the suggestions in the literature that the symptoms of the gastric cascade are caused by either the change in the stomach shape or the “volvulus-like” axial rotation of the fundus. It addresses the cascade stomach by interrupting the typical biloculation and preventing axial rotation through resection of the fundus. He suggested sleeve gastrectomy as a valuable option for recurrent CS that is unresponsive to other interventions.6

Another procedure reported to treat the cascade stomach with a minimally invasive technique was first performed by Battisi et al.7 namely laparoscopic gastro-gastric anastomosis. The upper gastric part was connected with the lower part -giving rise to the term ‘anastomosis’- hence, alternative channels for food passage were formed. He demonstrated significant success in alleviating symptoms and restoring normal gastric function using this technique.7

In a case report by Chhabra et al.,1 a 57-year-old male with a diagnosis of cascade stomach underwent Nissen fundoplication after nonoperative treatment proved ineffective. Nissen fundoplication is another recommended surgical management for CS. In Nissen’s fundoplication, the upper part of the gastric loculus was used to create a sheath around the lower part of the esophagus. This technique served as both gastropexy and obliterated dead space in the upper loculus. The patient experienced no complications, and at a 5-year follow-up, his condition had completely resolved with a 3.5 kg weight gain.1

Recently, Bondar et al.8 detailed the case of a 55-year-old male presenting with upper gastrointestinal symptoms and was ultimately diagnosed with a cascade stomach characterized by a biloculated gastric cavity and pyloroduodenal thickening leading to luminal narrowing. After conservative treatment was ineffective, the patient underwent exploratory laparotomy, including gastropexy, gastrojejunostomy, and jejunojejunal anastomoses, with the stomach anchored to the diaphragm to prevent postoperative volvulus. The surgery was successful, resulting in complete symptom resolution at the months follow-up, demonstrating the efficacy of this approach in managing cascade stomach cases resistant to conservative treatment.8

Discussion

Cascade stomach (CS) is a rare anatomical abnormality in which the stomach is divided into two chambers: an upper, inert sac (typically the fundus), and a lower active compartment responsible for motility. The condition often involves the backward folding of the fundus, creating a “cascade” effect visible in radiographic studies.1,9 Interestingly, CS has also been linked to obesity and metabolic syndrome. The elevated intra-abdominal pressure, responsible for this association, drives the stomach upward toward the diaphragm, causing the fundus to bend backward and ultimately bulge into the lesser sac above the splenic artery and pancreas.1012

Symptoms occur when the upper sac fills and spills contents into the lower chamber, disrupting mixing and propulsion, resulting in delayed gastric emptying (DGE).4,14 DGE is associated with an increased frequency of transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxation (TLESR), which heightens the risk of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) as TLESR events occur more often.10,13,15 Associated upper gastrointestinal symptoms associated with CS include reflux symptoms including heartburn, regurgitation, and burping that arise from elevated intra-gastric pressure; dyspepsia symptoms such as feelings of post-meal fullness, bloating, early satiety, nausea, vomiting, and loss of appetite are linked to DGE; and epigastralgia symptoms encompass epigastric pain and heat caused by mucosal stretching and irritation.2,4

Population studies by Kusano et al. involving more than 1000 subjects showed that CS patients are twice as likely to develop symptoms compared to the general population, with women showing even higher odds.4 Additionally Bernante et al. reported that CS has been observed in 8.8% of 253 bariatric surgery patients, highlighting its potential underdiagnosis. These findings emphasize the need for improved detection and management strategies for this rare disorder.10

Sleeve gastrectomy indication and caution

This evidence suggests that sleeve gastrectomy significantly reduces symptoms of CS. However, outcomes such as nutritional deficiencies, weight reduction, and development of GERD following sleeve gastrectomy require further monitoring and comparison, as this procedure is often used in bariatric treatment.

Schaffner et al.’s case showed significant symptom relief after surgery. The entire fundus was resected, leaving a strip on the lesser curvature. This pioneering approach demonstrated the potential for targeted surgery in cases unresponsive to conservative treatments, reducing the non-functional loculus, and preventing axial stomach rotation to alleviate symptoms such as DGE and reflux. According to the long-term outcome and follow-up of gastric resection in this case, a year after surgery, the patient had no return on symptoms and gained a considerable amount of weight. He was also able to carry on his work without burden.5

The latest research by Schouten et al. expanded on this by performing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy in patients with recurrent CS following prior gastropexy procedures. The sleeve gastrectomy effectively addressed the biloculated structure of the stomach and prevented volvulus-like axial rotation, thereby providing long-term symptom resolution. These cases highlight the versatility of sleeve gastrectomy as a treatment for CS, particularly in patients with persistent or recurrent symptoms, offering a minimally invasive option with durable outcomes. Initially, the patient experienced weight loss after surgery. However, after 24 months of follow-up, the patient remained free of pain or gastrointestinal issues. She exhibited normal eating habits, favoring smaller meals, and her initial weight loss stabilized.6

Nevertheless, apart from the advantages of sleeve gastrectomy in reducing the symptoms of CS, GERD is widely known to be a frequent complication associated with sleeve gastrectomy (SG) procedures. Normally, after food intake, the gastric fundus exerts pressure on the esophagus, triggering an anti-reflux mechanism through the contraction of the sling and clasp fibers. Sleeve gastrectomy (SG) disrupts these processes by excising the gastric fundus, modifying the angle of His, and increasing intragastric pressure, which may contribute to the development of GERD. However, the effect of SG on GERD continues to be a topic of debate.16 Rebecchi et al. found an improvement in symptoms in patients with preoperative acid reflux, while a 5.4% incidence of newly developed (“de novo”) GERD was reported in individuals with normal preoperative pH monitoring. They emphasized two critical technical aspects, namely, a technically correct gastric resection without creating mid-stomach stenosis and a careful dissection of the angle of His, keeping a safe distance from the gastroesophageal junction.17 Similarly, Daes et al. reported GERD resolution in most cases post-SG, identifying technical factors such as incisura angularis narrowing, fundus dilation, and persistent hiatal hernia Correcting these factors during surgery significantly reduces the incidence of GERD and the need for postoperative endoscopy.16

Other complications associated in sleeve gastrectomy include uncommon but critical staple line malformations that can result in an irregularly shaped gastric tube, elevated intraluminal pressure, and an increased likelihood of gastric leaks caused by tissue ischemia.1719 These often arise from faulty staple line formation, poor tissue alignment, or technical errors during the stapling process. Additionally, pancreatic leaks, although rarely reported, can occur during SG, particularly in patients with a history of complex abdominal surgery that results in adhesions between the pancreas and stomach.20

Further research comparing this approach to alternative surgical techniques such as gastropexy or fundoplication is essential to establish a standardized guide.

Comparison of surgical technique

Surgical techniques for treating CS vary in approach and outcome. Gastric Fundus Resection by Schaffner et al. (1941) was an early open surgical approach focused on removing the non-functional loculus to alleviate symptoms such as delayed gastric emptying (DGE) and reflux. The outcome was highly positive with long-term symptom resolution and significant patient satisfaction. However, the invasive nature of surgery poses risks inherent to open procedures.5

Laparoscopic Gastro-Gastric Anastomosis by Battisti et al., 1998, shows a minimally invasive technique that joins the upper and lower chambers of the stomach, creating an alternative food passage. This resulted in complete symptom relief and weight gain at the 3-month follow-up. This approach is less invasive, but may not address axial rotation issues as effectively as other methods.7

Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy (LSG) by Schouten et al. (2007) was used for recurrent CS after previous gastropexy failures. It addressed biloculation and axial rotation, leading to long-term relief with no reported complications for over 24 months. This procedure is minimally invasive and has durable outcomes, but may carry risks of post-sleeve GERD due to anatomical changes.6

Laparoscopic Nissen Fundoplication by Chhabra & Mongia (2016) is an anti-reflux procedure that wraps the gastric fundus around the lower esophagus, addressing both CS and GERD. The patient experienced complete symptom resolution and weight gain over a 5-year follow-up. Although effective for reflux control, it may not fully resolve biloculation-related symptoms.1

Hybrid Techniques by Bondar et al. (2023) were a combination of gastropexy, gastrojejunostomy, and jejunojejunal anastomoses that were performed to correct anatomical abnormalities and improve gastric motility. The patient reported complete symptom resolution at six months, highlighting the efficacy of the approach in complex cases unresponsive to simpler interventions.8

All techniques were effective in resolving CS-related symptoms, with sleeve gastrectomy and hybrid techniques demonstrating durable outcomes in patients with recurrence. Laparoscopic techniques (gastro-gastric anastomosis, sleeve gastrectomy, Nissen fundoplication) provided reduced recovery times and lower complication rates compared to open fundus resection.1,57 Nissen fundoplication specifically targeted GERD, whereas sleeve gastrectomy carried a risk of “de novo” GERD due to altered anatomy.1 While in hybrid approaches by Bondar et al. offer flexibility in addressing combined anatomical and motility issues, particularly in resistant cases.8 This comparison highlights that while each technique has strengths, the choice depends on individual patient factors, including symptom severity, anatomical complexity, and prior surgical history.

Application of study results and case presentation

The patient presented in this EBCR was diagnosed with a cascade stomach that is unique and rare because of the lack of detection in clinical practice with the presence of upper gastrointestinal symptoms. Based on the studies reviewed in this article, SG should be considered as a treatment option for this condition. In this patient, proximal sleeve gastrectomy was performed as the patient had already undergone Roux-en-Y gastrojejunostomy bypass surgery 20 years ago; however the symptoms reappeared, and after the current procedure demonstrated favorable outcomes, with no complications observed. Post-operative complaints were resolved without complications, and no recurrence was reported during the two-year follow-up period. However, the commentary regarding this procedure in treating cascade stomach is not well described in the literature. Hopefully, this case report will enhance the scientific basis for employing sleeve to treat complex or recurrent cases of CS.

Strengths and limitations

This study contributes significantly to the limited literature on cascade stomach (CS), offering valuable insights into the surgical management of this rare and often under-diagnosed condition. Based on the literature review, this study is the first to combine case-based evidence with a comprehensive analysis of existing research on the topic, offering a thorough perspective on the effectiveness of proximal sleeve gastrectomy in comparison to other methods. By including long-term follow-up data, this study underscores the durability of symptom resolution and functional improvements after surgery, which are critical for evaluating the clinical utility of the procedure.

However, this study has certain limitations. The limited number of cases and lack of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or meta-analyses in the literature review hinder the generalizability of the findings. Furthermore, potential confounding factors, such as variations in surgical techniques, patient anatomy, and pre-existing conditions, which may influence outcomes, have not been fully explored. This underscores the need for larger, multicenter studies to establish standardized management guidelines and comprehensively evaluate long-term risks.

Conclusion

Proximal sleeve gastrectomy is an effective intervention for CS, offering significant symptom resolution and long-term improvement. It also has a positive effect on the resection of the stomach, which prevents biloculation. The evidence from the case report and reviewed literature underscores the capacity of the procedure to address biloculated gastric structures and prevent axial rotation as key contributors to the pathophysiology of CS. Further research is needed to optimize surgical interventions for CS, ensuring both efficacy and minimization of potential complications, such as weight loss, GERD, and gastric leakage.

Consent

Written informed consent for publication of clinical details and/or clinical images was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report. A copy of the written consent form is available for review by the Editor-in-Chief of this journal upon request.

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 1
VERSION 1 PUBLISHED 17 Jul 2025
Comment
Author details Author details
Competing interests
Grant information
Copyright
Download
 
Export To
metrics
Views Downloads
F1000Research - -
PubMed Central
Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.
- -
Citations
CITE
how to cite this article
Jeo WS, Mazni Y, Putranto AS et al. Case Report: Comparative Analysis of Surgical Treatments with Sleeve Gastrectomy in Recurrent Cascade Stomach [version 1; peer review: 2 approved with reservations]. F1000Research 2025, 14:702 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.160339.1)
NOTE: If applicable, it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
track
receive updates on this article
Track an article to receive email alerts on any updates to this article.

Open Peer Review

Current Reviewer Status: ?
Key to Reviewer Statuses VIEW
ApprovedThe paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approvedFundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions
Version 1
VERSION 1
PUBLISHED 17 Jul 2025
Views
3
Cite
Reviewer Report 10 Sep 2025
Hala al Asadi, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, USA 
Approved with Reservations
VIEWS 3
Thank you for allowing me to review this case report. The data regarding this rare disease is interesting. However, I think detailing some of the case you presented would add a lot to this paper. 
1- What was the ... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
al Asadi H. Reviewer Report For: Case Report: Comparative Analysis of Surgical Treatments with Sleeve Gastrectomy in Recurrent Cascade Stomach [version 1; peer review: 2 approved with reservations]. F1000Research 2025, 14:702 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.176223.r404855)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
Views
6
Cite
Reviewer Report 23 Aug 2025
Dimitrios Kehagias, Hull University Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Hull, England, UK 
Approved with Reservations
VIEWS 6
Thank you for the opportunity to review this interesting case study with review of the literature. The authors present a case of cascade stomach and elaborate on the surgical techniques described in the current literature, since the exact treatment is ... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
Kehagias D. Reviewer Report For: Case Report: Comparative Analysis of Surgical Treatments with Sleeve Gastrectomy in Recurrent Cascade Stomach [version 1; peer review: 2 approved with reservations]. F1000Research 2025, 14:702 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.176223.r402169)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 1
VERSION 1 PUBLISHED 17 Jul 2025
Comment
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Approved - the paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations - A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approved - fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions
Sign In
If you've forgotten your password, please enter your email address below and we'll send you instructions on how to reset your password.

The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.

Email address not valid, please try again

You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.

You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.

Code not correct, please try again
Email us for further assistance.
Server error, please try again.