ALL Metrics
-
Views
-
Downloads
Get PDF
Get XML
Cite
Export
Track
Research Article

Ultra-Processed Food Consumption, Additive Co-occurrence, and Associated Risk Factors Among University Students in Peru

[version 1; peer review: awaiting peer review]
PUBLISHED 02 Sep 2025
Author details Author details
OPEN PEER REVIEW
REVIEWER STATUS AWAITING PEER REVIEW

This article is included in the Agriculture, Food and Nutrition gateway.

Abstract

Background

The rising consumption of ultra-processed foods (UPFs) is a global concern, given their poor nutritional quality and the presence of multiple additives that may pose health risks when consumed in excess. Young populations are particularly vulnerable due to lifestyle habits and the widespread availability and accessibility of these products. The present study aimed to assess the consumption of ultra-processed foods (UPFs), taking into account the co-occurrence of additives and their association with risk factors in a young population.

Methods

A two-phase cross-sectional study was conducted. In the first phase, 500 ultra-processed food products available on the Peruvian market were analysed and classified into five groups: meat products, cereals, confectionery, dairy, and beverages, in order to identify the presence and frequency of additives. In the second phase, a structured survey was administered to 385 students, collecting data on UPF consumption over the previous 24 hours, along with variables related to lifestyle. Chi-square tests and ordinal logistic regression were used to analyse the associations.

Results

The categories with the highest levels of consumption were carbonated beverages (59.6%), meat products (54.7%), and dairy in various forms (66.3%). A high frequency of co-occurrence was identified between colourings and acidulants, particularly INS 133, INS 150d, and INS 339i. Statistical analysis revealed a significant association between UPF consumption and male sex (OR = 1.603), as well as alcohol consumption (OR = 2.059), while age showed an inverse relationship (OR = 0.756). Other variables, such as physical activity and smoking, did not demonstrate a significant association.

Conclusion

It is concluded that excessive consumption of UPFs varies according to age and sex, represents a continuous source of exposure to food additives, and is significantly associated with a direct risk factor, alcohol consumption, which is critical to human health and well-being.

Keywords

Ultra processed foods, Food additives, Dietary intake, Public health nutrition

Introduction

Ultra-processed foods (UPFs), pre-packaged products predominantly manufactured on an industrial scale, have come to dominate the food environment in both high- and low-income settings (Baric et al., 2025). In Latin America, their consumption has surged in recent years, particularly in the form of beverages. Uruguay has experienced a 146% increase in UPF sales, followed by Bolivia (130%) and Peru (107%). Similarly, Brazil and Peru have witnessed a 38.9% rise in fast food intake, often replacing more nutritious traditional diets (Instituto Nacional de Salud, 2023).

In Peru, Choque-Quispe et al. (2023) reported that 3.9% of adolescents aged 15 to 18 consume UPFs daily, while 75.5% consume them one to three times per month. Beverages were the most frequently consumed (30.4%), followed by processed meats and sweets (both 17.6%), and dairy products (12.7%). In Chile, students aged 17 to 24 showed higher consumption rates of sauces and spreads (78.4%), processed meats (76.3%), and beverages (74.8%), whereas intake of fast foods (28.1%), savoury snacks (35.3%), and cereal-based items (37.4%) was comparatively lower (Vilugrón et al., 2022). Among older adults (mean age: 47), UPF consumption was notably lower (24%), with a marked preference for minimally processed foods (51.6%) (Anjos et al., 2024). In Spain, Gearhardt et al. (2023) identified signs of UPF addiction in 14% of the adult population and 12% of children, characterised by impulsive behaviour, emotional dysregulation, and diminished quality of life.

UPFs can pose significant health risks when consumed excessively or without adherence to age-specific dietary recommendations. These products typically contain food additives, substances deliberately introduced to alter physical, chemical, biological, or sensory properties, predominantly used for technical purposes in industrial manufacturing (World Health Organization [WHO], 2023). They also tend to be rich in saturated fats, sugars, and sodium, all linked to an elevated risk of non-communicable diseases, including cancer, diabetes, and cardiovascular conditions. Notably, approximately 72% of daily sodium intake originates from added salt and food additives, with the remainder derived from natural sources (8%) and table salt (20%) (Carbajal & Moreno, 2023; Dicken et al., 2024; Lou et al., 2021). Furthermore, sugar-sweetened beverages have been associated with increased body weight, type 2 diabetes, and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (Malik & Hu, 2022).

The widespread shift from home-cooked, natural foods to ready-to-eat UPFs represents a broader transformation in dietary practices (Aracta-Maquera, 2023; Choque-Quispe et al., 2023). These products—from soups and fizzy drinks to processed meats—are readily available, affordable, and increasingly perceived as convenient staples. However, their health consequences are often overlooked, despite regulatory efforts such as the Peruvian Healthy Eating Promotion Law for Children and Adolescents (Ley 30021, Congreso de la República del Perú, 2013), which mandates clear front-of-pack labelling for excessive contents of sodium, sugars, and saturated fats (FAO, 2024a; Avilés et al., 2017).

Generation Z, born between approximately 1995 and 2010, has matured within a highly digitised environment and faces challenges including nutritional autonomy, financial constraints, academic demands, and limited experience with meal planning. These conditions often lead to choices that prioritise convenience and visual appeal over nutritional value. Wanjohi et al. (2025) found that this demographic tends to view UPFs as modern, urban, and desirable, whereas traditional foods are often regarded as outdated or unappealing.

Diet remains a modifiable risk factor, and the presence of food additives may exacerbate health risks. Emulsifying polysaccharides, for example, have been implicated in inflammatory bowel diseases (Nickerson et al., 2015; Laudisi et al., 2019). Mono- and diglycerides of fatty acids (INS 471 and INS 472) have been linked to increased cardiovascular risk (Sellem et al., 2023), while sweeteners such as aspartame and acesulfame-K are under scrutiny for their potential carcinogenicity (Debras et al., 2022). A systematic review of cohort studies found associations between non-nutritive sweeteners—including aspartame, sucralose, and steviol glycosides—and increased body weight, waist circumference, obesity, hypertension, and metabolic syndrome (Azad et al., 2017).

In Peru, the General Directorate of Environmental Health and Food Safety (DIGESA), under the Codex Alimentarius framework, is responsible for enforcing these regulations. Its mandate includes preserving food quality, improving shelf stability, and facilitating processes such as manufacturing, preparation, packaging, and storage—provided that additives are not used to mask inferior raw materials or substandard practices (FAO, 2024a). Nonetheless, there remains a lack of targeted research on consumption patterns, risk perception, and additive exposure among Generation Z university students, a cohort particularly vulnerable to modern food environments and autonomous dietary choices (Barroso, 2020). This gap represents a barrier to designing effective interventions, particularly in light of the rising incidence of non-communicable diseases at increasingly early ages (Fedde et al., 2025). Addressing these factors is essential if public health systems are to succeed in promoting healthy lifestyles.

Accordingly, the present study aims to assess the consumption of ultra-processed foods among young individuals, with a particular focus on the co-occurrence of additives and their association with health-related risk factors.

Methods

Research design

The study employed a cross-sectional observational design and was conducted in two phases, generating a complementary dataset.

  • (1) A descriptive analysis was undertaken of 500 ultra-processed food products available in major supermarket chains across Peru. The products were classified into five categories: meat products, cereals, confectionery, dairy, and beverages. Ingredient labels were examined to identify the presence and frequency of food additives, including colourings, acidulants, preservatives, antioxidants, and sweeteners Organización Panamericana de la Salud, 2015; FAO, 2024b).

  • (2) A structured survey was administered to a probabilistic sample of 385 university students from Generation Z (born between 1995 and 2010). The sample size was calculated using the formula for infinite populations (Aguilar-Barojas, 2005), with a 95% confidence level, a 5% margin of error, and an expected proportion of 50%.

The data collection instrument was previously validated by three experts in food technology, nutrition, and public health to ensure its relevance and clarity. To assess its reliability, a pilot test was conducted with 20 students to evaluate the comprehensibility and consistency of the questions. This process enabled necessary adjustments to be made prior to its final administration. Both the validity and reliability coefficients of the instrument exceeded 0.7.

This study complied with established ethical standards to safeguard the rights and dignity of all participants. Informed consent was obtained voluntarily and in written form via an initial question embedded in the online questionnaire, which allowed individuals to either confirm or decline their participation. Only those who provided explicit consent were permitted to proceed. All participants were adults and received comprehensive information regarding the study’s objectives. Data confidentiality was upheld through anonymisation and the secure storage of all collected information, in strict accordance with the ethical principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki and the Code of Ethics of César Vallejo University, as endorsed by University Council Resolution No. 0126-2017-UCV. Participants were assured of their right to withdraw from the study at any stage without incurring any negative repercussions.

Classification and co-occurrence of additives in ultra-processed foods

Ultra-processed foods (UPFs) were defined as industrial formulations composed of substances extracted from foods, synthetic constituents, or food additives, including acidity regulators, stabilisers, antioxidants, preservatives, and sweeteners.

A total of 500 UPF products available in the leading supermarket chains in Peru were acquired for analysis. Ultra-processed beverages were classified according to the criteria established by the Pan American Health Organization (PAHO, 2015), which include carbonated drinks, fruit juices, sports and energy drinks, as well as ready-to-drink tea or coffee. Meanwhile, food items were categorised following the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO, 2023) guidelines into meat products, cereals or cereal-based products, dairy products, and confectionery.

Non-perishable beverages and foods were stored in a cool environment, whereas perishable items were kept refrigerated at 4°C until analysis. Additive identification was based on the review of ingredient lists as declared on the nutritional labels of each product. The percentage of products within each category containing at least one additive was calculated according to the methodology proposed by Lorenzoni et al. (2021), and additive groupings were determined through cluster analysis, represented using dendrograms.

Risk factors associated with the consumption of ultra-processed foods and beverages among university students

University students were selected as the target population, as they are considered one of the primary consumer groups of ultra-processed foods due to factors such as ease of access, habitual meal-skipping, use of discretionary funds, exposure to advertising, and the influence of social media. To assess consumption, a structured questionnaire was employed, focusing on the UPFs consumed within the previous 24 hours. The instrument comprised 19 items, including questions on ultra-processed foods and beverages, classified into five categories. The data collected were subsequently organised, with illegible or inconsistent responses excluded to maintain data integrity.

Consumption within each food group was recorded using dichotomous responses (yes/no). A consumption score was calculated by summing the number of food groups reported as consumed the previous day, resulting in a range from 1 to 15. These scores were then grouped into three categories: 0–4, 5–10, and over 10, with scores of 5 or more considered indicative of excessive consumption (Costa et al., 2021).

Given that food additives are subject to varying recommendations and usage limits, the five most frequently consumed UPF products were initially selected. The ingredient lists reported on their labels were then analysed to determine the quantity per serving and to identify any potential adverse effects associated with their intake.

In addition, four major modifiable risk factors associated with the development of non-communicable chronic diseases were evaluated: excessive alcohol consumption, physical inactivity, tobacco use, and poor dietary quality. Excessive alcohol intake was assessed with the question: “In the past 30 days, have you ever consumed five or more alcoholic beverages in one occasion?” Physical activity was measured by asking: “Do you engage in exercise at least once per week?”

Dietary quality was estimated based on UPF intake, with consumption of more than five UPF items on the previous day categorised as excessive.

  • Independent variable: Level of consumption (high – medium – low)

  • Dependent variables: Risk factors (alcohol consumption, place of food intake [home or boarding house], smoking habits, physical activity, age, and sex)

Data analysis

A descriptive analysis was conducted using absolute and relative frequency distributions to determine the consumption of ultra-processed foods (UPFs) within the study sample. Additionally, a clustering analysis was performed using a hierarchical organisation technique to identify patterns of co-occurrence among food additives.

Inferential analysis included the chi-square test of independence, as well as an ordinal logistic regression, aimed at evaluating the impact of independent variables on the dependent variable. A significance level of 5% was adopted. Data processing and analysis were carried out using SPSS software, version 26 (IBM).

Results

Clustering of food additives and UPF consumption by category

Within the category of meat products, sausages exhibited the highest consumption frequency, reaching 54.7%. Among beverages, carbonated soft drinks stood out at 59.6%. In the cereal group, pasta and noodles were consumed by 48.6% of the students. Regarding confectionery items, biscuits ranked first with 48.9%, while in the dairy category, milk in its various forms was the most preferred, with a consumption rate of 66.3% ( Table 1).

Table 1. Consumption patterns of ultra-processed beverages and products by category among university students, January – April 2024.

GroupProduct Frequency (%)
MeatTypes of sausages118054.7
Hamburger13741.6
Processed meats210732.5
Pork cracklings/Bacon8525.8
Nuggets4714.3
Pâté61.8
N/A (Not available)9328.3
BeveragesSoft drinks19659.6
Packaged nectars/Industrialized juices13340.4
Sports drinks/Energy drinks12939.2
Flavored water6118.5
Bottled teas4914.9
None of the above5817.6
Cereal-based productsPasta/Noodles16048.6
Salty snacks13942.2
Instant mixes6218.8
None of the above9027.4
Confectionery productsCookies16148.9
Chocolates15045.6
Pastries312136.8
Hard/Chewy candies414343.5
None of the above5717.3
Dairy productsMilk521866.3
Yogurt18054.7
Cheese13942.2
Soy milk267.9
Flavored dairy beverages154.6
None of the above5917.9

1 Hot dog, sausage, chorizo.

2 Luncheon meat, mortadella, ham.

3 Cakes, sponge cakes.

4 Gummy candies, chewing gum, lollipops, hard candies.

5 Milk: powdered, evaporated, condensed, cream-based.

Figure 1 illustrates how certain beverages (fruit-based, energy, and carbonated drinks) tend to cluster based on the colourings and acidity regulators they contain. In fruit-flavoured beverages, colourings INS 133 (Brilliant Blue FCF) and INS 150d (Caramel IV) were frequently found together (Figure 1A). In contrast, energy and carbonated drinks were more likely to contain other colourings such as INS 160 (Carotene), INS 170 (Calcium Carbonate), INS 132 (Indigotine), and INS 131 (Patent Blue V) (Figure 1B). Notably, when a product contained INS 160, it was commonly paired with INS 170, suggesting a frequent co-usage pattern. Similarly, in fruit-based drinks, the combination of INS 110 (Sunset Yellow FCF) and INS 160 was prevalent, while the most common pairing in energy and fizzy drinks was INS 110 and INS 150. However, these colourings were generally used independently of other additives. Colouring INS 102 (Tartrazine) appeared isolated in the dendrogram, suggesting relatively limited use in the analysed samples.

267d1943-f60f-4f5b-900c-26abcf4bb56a_figure1.gif

Figure 1. (A) Dendrogram of the most frequently used food colorants in fruit-based beverages, (B) Dendrogram of the most frequently used food colorants in energy and carbonated beverages, (C) Dendrogram of the most frequently used acidity regulators in fruit-based beverages, (D) Dendrogram of the most frequently used acidity regulators in energy and carbonated beverages.

Regarding acidity regulators, fruit-flavoured beverages frequently contained both INS 300 (Ascorbic Acid) and INS 327 (Sodium Lactate) (Figure 1C). In contrast, energy and carbonated drinks commonly featured INS 341 (Calcium Phosphates), INS 500 (Sodium Carbonates), INS 340 (Potassium Phosphates), and INS 296 (Malic Acid). One particular acidulant showed a clustering distance nearly 25 units greater than the others (Figure 1D), indicating infrequent co-use with other additives.

Dairy products were also clustered based on their acidity regulators, while meat products and oils and fats were grouped according to their antioxidant content. The commonly identified acidulants included INS 339i (Monosodium Phosphate), INS 452i (Sodium Polyphosphate), INS 331i (Monosodium Citrate), and INS 500i (Sodium Carbonate), the latter also appearing in carbonated and energy drinks (Figure 2A).

267d1943-f60f-4f5b-900c-26abcf4bb56a_figure2.gif

Figure 2. (A) Dendrogram of the most frequently used acidity regulators in dairy products, (B) Dendrogram of the most frequently used food antioxidants and preservatives in meat products, (C) Dendrogram of the most frequently used food antioxidants in oils and fats.

The antioxidant INS 330 (Citric Acid) was frequently found in both meat products and oils and fats. However, in the former, it was most often co-present with INS 304 (Ascorbyl Palmitate), while in the latter it was more commonly associated with INS 386 (Disodium EDTA). The antioxidants showing the greatest dissimilarity or least frequent use in these products were INS 300 (Ascorbic Acid) in meat products and INS 385 (Calcium Disodium EDTA) in oils and fats, respectively (Figures 2B and 2C).

Prevalence of risk factors in relation to the consumption of ultra-processed foods

Using the chi-square test of independence ( Table 2), a significant association was found between the consumption of ultra-processed foods and the sex of the students (p = 0.028), as well as their alcohol consumption (p = 0.005). An ordinal logistic regression model was applied to evaluate the effect of the independent variables on the likelihood of UPF consumption within the categories: Permitted, Excess I, and Excess II. The model was statistically significant (χ2 = 27.082, p = 0.003), although it accounted for only 8.9% (R2 = 0.089) of the variance in the dependent variable categories. The results for predictive values and Odds Ratios are presented in Table 3.

Table 2. Chi-Square test of independence between study variables and ultra-processed food consumption among surveyed university students (January – April 2024).

Risk factorsUltra-processed food consumptionStatistic χ2 Value “P”
Permitted Excess I Excess II
Age16-2148946810.4660.106
22-27213532
28-338101
34534
SexFemale4882777.1840.028*
Male346028
Study modalityIn-person 3761472.8910.576
Virtual053
Both457655
DietAt home70113821.7030.427
In Student Boarding Houses122923
Drinks alcoholic beveragesYes48793714.9380.005*
Occasionally325558
No2810
Drank alcoholic beverages in the last monthYes69113801.7980.407
No132925
Exercise/played sports in the last 3 monthsYes6298731.2200.543
No204432
Exercise at least once a weekYes5081570.8420.656
No326148
SmokesYes79130971.9300.381
No3128
Total82142105

Table 3. Logistic regression model for the effect of risk factors on the consumption of ultra-processed foods among surveyed university students, January – April 2024.

Risk factorsB (DE)p95% CI for OR
Odds RatioLow High
Age group-0.279 (0.1446)0.0480.7560.5701.004
Sex0.472 (0.2246)0.0361.6031.0322.490
Study Modality-0.045 (0.2182)0.837
Diet-0.307 (0.2628)0.248
Drinks alcoholic beverages0.722 (0.2071)0.0002.0591.3723.089
Drank alcoholic beverages in the last month0.001 (0.3078)0.998
Exercise/played sports in the last 3 months-0.176 (0.2923)0.544
Exercise at least once a week-0.082 (0.2625)0.753
Smokes0.072 (0.4430)0.874

Specifically, male students were 1.603 times more likely to report higher UPF consumption. Additionally, for each one-point increase in alcohol consumption, the likelihood of higher UPF intake increased by 2.059 times. Conversely, for each increase in age group, students were 0.756 times less likely to report high UPF consumption. The remaining study variables showed no statistically significant effect on the outcome variable (p > 0.05) ( Table 3).

Discussion

Carbonated soft drinks were the most preferred ultra-processed beverages, consumed by over 50% of the study population, whose mean age was 24.5 ± 0.01 years. Among solid products, between 41.6% and 66.4% of students reported consumption of items in the meat, dairy, and confectionery groups (including biscuits). These high levels of intake are consistent with the findings of Mamani-Urrutia et al. (2021), who reported elevated consumption of biscuits (56%) and dairy products (54.3%) among university students. A similar order of preference was observed by Choque-Quispe et al. (2023) in Peruvian adolescents aged 14 to 18 years; however, the reported values were lower: beverages (30.4%), meat products (17.4%), and confectionery (17.4%). In Brazil, according to Simões et al. (2020), the highest UPF consumption among adolescents aged 18 to 19 in the state of Maranhão corresponded to the cereal group, particularly biscuits, cakes, and industrially processed white bread (14.1%). These patterns may be attributed to the academic demands faced by young individuals, often reflected in meal-skipping behaviours, particularly breakfast (Maza-Ávila et al., 2022).

Milk, with a consumption rate of 66.3%, was the most consumed UPF in the evaluated population, exceeding the figures reported by Rojas et al. (2011), who found milk consumption at 42.5% and cheese at 53.8% among children aged 8.73 years. According to the National Institute of Health (2023), frequent dairy intake ensures adequate calcium supply, as milk and yoghurt have high bioavailability of this mineral. However, it is important to consider age-specific intake recommendations: 1300 mg for adolescents aged 14 to 18, and 1000 mg for adults aged 19 to 50 and children aged 4 to 8. Although milk consumption was high, so too was that of soft drinks, which may be counterproductive given that both contain sugars, increasing caloric intake without significant nutritional benefit. Moreover, high-phosphorus diets can reduce calcium bioavailability (Takeda et al., 2014).

A total of 54.7% of participants reported sausage consumption—higher than that observed by Kotopoulou et al. (2022) in a Greek population, where sausage consumption stood at 23.8%, although a high intake of pork (41.5%) and turkey-based (32.7%) processed meats was reported. In a study by Wang et al. (2022) in Canada, bisphenol A was detected in meat products, with the highest levels found in roasted beef (118.23 ng/g), followed by cured pork (0.14 ng/g), and cold cuts such as ham, mortadella, and sausages (0.18 ng/g). Notably, these products often contain additives such as nitrites, whose excessive intake may exceed the acceptable daily intake (ADI) of 0.07 mg/kg body weight/day, posing a health risk.

Dendrogram analysis confirmed that the main antioxidants and preservatives used in meat products sold in Peru were ascorbyl palmitate (INS 304) and sodium nitrite (INS 250), respectively. Citric acid (INS 330) was identified as a common antioxidant in meat products, oils, and fats. Additionally, the most frequently used acidulants in dairy products and beverages were INS 339i, INS 452i, INS 300, and INS 341. These findings are in line with Chazelas et al. (2020), who reported that the most frequent preservatives in French meat products were sodium nitrite (INS 250), potassium nitrate (INS 252), and sodium acetate (INS 262), with sodium lactate (INS 325) and INS 262 frequently co-occurring as antioxidant and preservative, respectively.

In the confectionery group, the most commonly used colourants in combination were Allura Red AC (INS 129), Tartrazine (INS 102), Sunset Yellow FCF (INS 110), Brilliant Blue FCF (INS 133), Indigotine (INS 132), and Titanium Dioxide (INS 171), while Carmine (INS 120) was less frequently used. This pattern was also observed in the analysed beverages, except for Tartrazine (INS 102), which appeared less often. It is important to note that some of these additives are banned in certain countries due to potential adverse health effects. For example, INS 133 is banned in China, and INS 110 in Norway, Sweden, and Finland (Vázquez et al., 2016). Furthermore, phosphates such as INS 340 and INS 341 require monitoring in individuals with kidney disease (Garcia et al., 2017). Although these additives are not consumed directly, their presence in food implies indirect intake, which should remain within the limits established by rigorous scientific evaluations, including biochemical and toxicological studies, to determine their ADI (WHO, 2023).

An analysis based on data from the “Pesquisa de Orçamentos Familiares” for the years 2008 and 2018 revealed that UPFs accounted for 19.7% of total caloric intake during 2017–2018. The study reported higher consumption among women than men (Louzada et al., 2018) and found an association between UPF-rich diets and an unfavourable cardiometabolic risk profile, which increases the likelihood of developing cardiovascular disease (Pagliai et al., 2021).

Excessive alcohol consumption also negatively affects dietary patterns and nutritional status. Alcohol abuse has been linked to deficiencies in essential micronutrients such as thiamine, riboflavin, niacin, pyridoxine, folic acid, vitamins A, C, D, E, and K, as well as magnesium, selenium, and zinc (Jeynes & Gibson, 2017). Alcohol also increases the preference for foods high in sugar and fat (Jeynes & Gibson, 2017; Schrieks et al., 2015). In a randomised clinical trial involving healthy men in the Netherlands, moderate alcohol intake was shown to increase spontaneous consumption of high-fat foods, such as pâté and salami (Schrieks et al., 2015).

In New Zealand, Parackal et al. (2020) found that women who consumed more than four alcoholic drinks on a typical day at least once a week had higher intakes of carbohydrates and fats (total, saturated, monounsaturated, and polyunsaturated). They also had lower serum folate levels compared to those who drank less frequently (≤ 4 drinks, once a month or less). In Spain, Escrivá-Martínez et al. (2023) observed a direct relationship between binge eating, high fat consumption, and alcohol abuse.

It is well established that diet quality and dietary factors play a key role in the prevention of non-communicable chronic diseases (Global Burden of Disease et al., 2019; Laudisi et al., 2019). High UPF consumption adversely affects nutritional status (Baroni et al., 2018), making it essential to maintain a healthy, balanced, and varied diet that is sustainable over time and contributes to healthy ageing.

Ethical considerations

This study was conducted in accordance with the Code of Ethics guidelines established by César Vallejo University and the provisions of Rector’s Resolution No. 0126-2017-UCV. This study was approved by the Institutional Research Ethics Committee of Universidad César Vallejo (Approval ID: 0020-2023/CEI-FIA-DOC). Informed consent was obtained voluntarily and in written form via an initial question embedded in the online questionnaire, which allowed individuals to either confirm or decline their participation. Only those who provided explicit consent were permitted to proceed.

Data availability

Underlying data

Zenodo: Database: Ultra-Processed Food Consumption, Additive Co-occurrence, and Associated Risk Factors Among University Students in Peru” available from: DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15678467 (Guillén and Saenz, 2025).

This project contains the following underlying data:

Data are available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC-BY 4.0).

Extended data

Zenodo: Database: Ultra-Processed Food Consumption, Additive Co-occurrence, and Associated Risk Factors Among University Students in Peru, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15939817 (Guillén and Saenz, 2025).

This project contains the following underlying data:

Data are available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC-BY 4.0).

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 1
VERSION 1 PUBLISHED 02 Sep 2025
Comment
Author details Author details
Competing interests
Grant information
Copyright
Download
 
Export To
metrics
Views Downloads
F1000Research - -
PubMed Central
Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.
- -
Citations
CITE
how to cite this article
GUILLEN SANCHEZ JS, Saenz Tolay M, Cabanillas Chirinos L and Pita Ruiz AM. Ultra-Processed Food Consumption, Additive Co-occurrence, and Associated Risk Factors Among University Students in Peru [version 1; peer review: awaiting peer review]. F1000Research 2025, 14:854 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.166729.1)
NOTE: If applicable, it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
track
receive updates on this article
Track an article to receive email alerts on any updates to this article.

Open Peer Review

Current Reviewer Status:
AWAITING PEER REVIEW
AWAITING PEER REVIEW
?
Key to Reviewer Statuses VIEW
ApprovedThe paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approvedFundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 1
VERSION 1 PUBLISHED 02 Sep 2025
Comment
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Approved - the paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations - A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approved - fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions
Sign In
If you've forgotten your password, please enter your email address below and we'll send you instructions on how to reset your password.

The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.

Email address not valid, please try again

You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.

You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.

Code not correct, please try again
Email us for further assistance.
Server error, please try again.