ALL Metrics
-
Views
-
Downloads
Get PDF
Get XML
Cite
Export
Track
Case Report

Case Report: Endoscopy Lithotripsy-Assisted Giant Stone Removal in Common Hepatic Duct during Common Bile Duct Exploration Surgery

[version 1; peer review: awaiting peer review]
PUBLISHED 10 Sep 2025
Author details Author details
OPEN PEER REVIEW
REVIEWER STATUS AWAITING PEER REVIEW

Abstract

Background

The management of giant bile duct stones, especially those impacted in the common hepatic duct, poses substantial clinical challenges. Generally, large stones are managed with methods such as Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) or direct choledochoscopy, which are limited by the size of the stones that can be effectively treated. Endoscopy lithotripsy using ureteroscopy (URS), typically used for kidney stones, shows promise for breaking down these large impacted bile duct stone.

Case Report

A 60-year-old female presented with intermittent right upper quadrant abdominal pain lasting two months, jaundice appearing three weeks before admission, dark urine, and clay-colored stools. Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) diagnosed her with obstructive jaundice due to multiple giant stones in the common hepatic duct (CHD) and common bile duct (CBD) with distal CBD stenosis. Following a cholecystectomy and CBD exploration—which revealed dilation from the common bile duct to the right and left hepatic ducts—a choledochotomy was performed. Multiple stones were found in the CBD and a giant, impacted stone in the CHD. Stone removal was achieved using URS lithotripsy, which fragmented the stones, allowing for evacuation. The largest stone measured approximately 4 cm. A side-to-side choledochoduodenostomy bypass was then performed from the CBD to the duodenum. The patient was discharged on post-operative day five in good condition and by day 14 post-operation, no jaundice or significant symptoms.

Conclusion

This case underscores the benefits of adapting endoscopy lithotripsy for biliary system use, particularly for challenging cases involving impacted giant stones in less accessible locations of the biliary tract.

Keywords

Endoscopy lithotripsy, Impacted bile duct stone, Obstructive jaundice

Background

Bile duct stone is a common diagnosis made by digestive surgeons in routine practice. Although usually asymptomatic, bile duct stone can obstruct the biliary tract, leading to symptoms such as jaundice, right-upper quadrant abdominal pain, and changes in urine and stool color. Most cases of biliary tract obstruction occur in the common bile duct (CBD).1 Giant bile duct stone are a rare presentation in cases of gallbladder stones and are defined as stones larger than 5 cm or 50 mm. In cases of impacted giant bile duct stone, standard non-invasive procedures like Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) are not feasible, thus management involves percutaneous approaches or open surgery.2,3 Lithotripsy, a device that emits sound waves, is commonly used to break up kidney or ureter stones to facilitate their spontaneous expulsion. This device also holds potential for breaking up giant bile duct stone, easing the removal of these stones. This case report aims to document the successful management of an impacted giant bile duct stone using endoscopy-guided ureteroscopy lithotripsy for the visualization and fragmentation of larged impacted stones located higher in the biliary tract.

Case presentation

A female in her sixties presented with intermittent right upper quadrant abdominal pain over several weeks. Initially, the patient experienced intermittent pain in the upper right abdomen for two months. Jaundiced developed several weeks before admission, symptoms included yellowing of the eyes, dark urine resembling strong tea, and pale clay-colored stools similar to putty, with no occurrence of black stools. Although these symptoms subsided on their own, abdominal pain recurred week ago, accompanied by increased jaundice. The patient reported nausea and vomiting but no fever and began to feel itchiness all over the body. No otrher relevant previous and familial history.

Upon physical examination, the patient was fully conscious with stable hemodynamic. The sclera was icteric, and the conjunctiva was not anaemic. The abdomen was soft and tender in the upper right quadrant, with a positive Murphy’s sign and no guarding. Laboratory tests showed a slight decrease in haemoglobin and haematocrit levels, normal leukocyte count, normal prothrombin time and activated partial thromboplastin time. There was an increase in bilirubin levels, with total bilirubin above 9.0 mg/dL and increased in total direct bilirubin above 7.0 mg/dL. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) revealed dilatation of the common bile duct (CBD) and intrahepatic bile ducts on both sides, along with multiple giant stones in the CBD and common hepatic duct (CHD) ( Figure 1). The diagnosis was obstructive jaundice due to multiple giant stones in the common hepatic duct and common bile duct with distal CBD stenosis.

2e16ee7e-3bb2-4158-809c-71148b820f61_figure1.gif

Figure 1. MRCP showing dilatation of the CBD and intrahepatic bile ducts on both sides, along with multiple giant stones in the CBD and CHD.

The surgical intervention consisted of CBD exploration and choledochotomy followed by a side-to-side choledochoduodenostomy and cholecystectomy. Intraoperatively, after cholecystectomy, CBD exploration showed dilatation extending to the right and left hepatic ducts. Choledochotomy was performed, revealing multiple stones in the CBD and a large, impacted stone in the CHD. Stone removal was facilitated using guided URS and lithotripsy, breaking the stone into fragments for evacuation (Figure 2A and 2B). The size of the stone was approximately 4 cm (Figure 2C). Proximal probing showed no stones, and distal probing indicated stenosis of the CBD with a probe size of 3 Fr. Proximal bile flow was smooth. A decision was made to perform a side-to-side bypass from the CBD to the duodenum (choledochoduodenostomy). The patient recovered well and was discharged within a week. At follow-up, she remained symptom-free.

2e16ee7e-3bb2-4158-809c-71148b820f61_figure2.gif

Figure 2. A) Documentation of the operator conducting endoscopy lithotripsy; B) Endoscopy Lithotripsy using ureteroscopy revealed a giant stone impacted in the CHD; C) Fragmented giant stone.

Discussion

This case report focuses on the use of endoscopy-lithotripsy for impacted giant common hepatic duct and common bile duct stones. The patient presented with typical symptoms of obstructive jaundice, including yellowing of the eyes, dark urine, and pale, clay-colored stools. As the disease progressed, the patient experienced abdominal pain accompanied by increased jaundice. These symptoms are common in cases of obstructive jaundice. It is important to determine whether the jaundice in this patient is prehepatic, intrahepatic, or posthepatic. To differentiate these, bilirubin levels were measured, showing increased total, conjugated, and unconjugated bilirubin levels. An increase in direct bilirubin above 1.0 mg/dL is noted as an anomaly when total bilirubin increases.4 Elevated conjugated bilirubin levels indicate obstructive jaundice primarily caused by cholestasis and hepatocellular dysfunction.5 The increase in unconjugated bilirubin in this patient might be due to the high total bilirubin already accumulated in the body, thus also raising the unconjugated bilirubin, although this increase is not as significant as that of conjugated bilirubin.

MRCP for this patient revealed multiple giant stones in the CBD and CHD. The occurrence of giant bile duct stone, defined as stones larger than 5 cm, is rare and associated with higher complication rates and technical difficulties in surgical management.2 The main management modality for bile duct obstruction due to bile duct stone is Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). However, the ERCP technique is known to have a low success rate for stones larger than 10 mm and is therefore not feasible for giant bile duct stone cases.3 The standard management for these bile duct stone is open surgery with CBD exploration, although there are some case reports of laparoscopic procedures for giant bile duct stone.6,7 In this case, the patient was decided to undergo open surgery with common bile duct exploration, choledocostomy, and cholecystectomy due to the presence of multiple bile duct stone involving many bile ducts. Additionally, open surgery was chosen due to the location of the impacted giant bile duct stone being higher than the bile duct which was in the CHD.

A highlight in this case report is the use of lithotripsy, which can break down giant bile duct stone with the aid of endoscopy ureteroscopy in patients undergoing open surgery. Lithotripsy is a fragmentation technique using sound waves typically used to break up kidney and ureter stones. The use of lithotripsy for breaking bile duct stone has been reported by this case report and other previous reports. Wang, et al. reported the use of Fluoroscopy-guided percutaneous lithotripsy using a FREDDY laser in patients with giant bile duct stone and reported a 100% success rate for bile duct stone clearance with a residual stone rate of 18.8% of cases.8 Endoscopic lithotripsy has also been reported by Khalil, et al. in patients undergoing percutaneous cholecystectomy. In this case report, Khalil, et al. used a pediatric video gastroscope for direct visualization of the gallbladder before applying electrohydraulic lithotripsy. The management was deemed successful in breaking the bile duct stone into small fragments that were drained using a catheter.9 In this case report, lithotripsy was performed using ureteroscopy. There are previous case reports that also used a ureteroscope to break giant bile duct stone with lithotripsy. Loffeld, et al. used ureteroscopy lithotripsy to visualize and break bile duct stone using a percutaneous approach.10

Based on literature review, previous case reports tended to use a percutaneous approach in performing lithotripsy because in those cases, the giant bile duct stone occurred at only one location. This case report is the first to apply ureteroscopy lithotripsy in patients undergoing open CBD exploration surgery where open surgery was chosen because the impacted bile duct occurred above the biliary tract. In normal cases, a higher incision is required to reach the location of the impacted giant bile duct stone, but in this case, by using endoscopic ureteroscopy visualization and lithotripsy to break the bile duct stone, the incision made in the patient could be reduced to only the CBD. The patient in this case report underwent overall stone removal management with good follow-up results and no complaints up to 14 days after surgery.

Conclusion

This case underscores the benefits of adapting endoscopy lithotripsy for biliary system use, particularly for challenging cases involving impacted giant stones in less accessible locations of the biliary tract. This technique reduced the necessity for large surgical incisions to reach the giant impacted bile duct stone in the common hepatic duct by fragmenting the stone. This case provides a new direction for future cases involving impacted bile duct stone in less accessible place.

Consent to publish

Written informed consent for publication of clinical details and images was obtained from the patient. The patient has reviewed the manuscript and agreed to the publication of anonymized information.

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 1
VERSION 1 PUBLISHED 10 Sep 2025
Comment
Author details Author details
Competing interests
Grant information
Copyright
Download
 
Export To
metrics
Views Downloads
F1000Research - -
PubMed Central
Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.
- -
Citations
CITE
how to cite this article
S AHP and Aby L. Case Report: Endoscopy Lithotripsy-Assisted Giant Stone Removal in Common Hepatic Duct during Common Bile Duct Exploration Surgery [version 1; peer review: awaiting peer review]. F1000Research 2025, 14:901 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.169022.1)
NOTE: If applicable, it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
track
receive updates on this article
Track an article to receive email alerts on any updates to this article.

Open Peer Review

Current Reviewer Status:
AWAITING PEER REVIEW
AWAITING PEER REVIEW
?
Key to Reviewer Statuses VIEW
ApprovedThe paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approvedFundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 1
VERSION 1 PUBLISHED 10 Sep 2025
Comment
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Approved - the paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations - A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approved - fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions
Sign In
If you've forgotten your password, please enter your email address below and we'll send you instructions on how to reset your password.

The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.

Email address not valid, please try again

You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.

You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.

Code not correct, please try again
Email us for further assistance.
Server error, please try again.